DOCSLIB.ORG

AIP Access Roads Permitting EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AIP Access Roads Permitting EA United States Department of the Interior BLM Bureau of Land Management Socorro Field Office 901 S. Highway 85 Socorro, NM 87801 Environmental Assessment for Arizona Interconnection Project Access Roads Permitting In portions of Catron, Socorro, Sierra, and Luna counties NEPA Number DOI-BLM-NM-A020-2014-0021-EA _________________________________________________________ Signature and Title of Project Lead Date ________________________________________________________________ Signature and Title Lead of Reviewer Date This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2. Purpose and Need ............................................................................................... 1-4 1.3. Applicant’s Objective ......................................................................................... 1-4 1.4. Decisions to Be Made ......................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.1. Bureau of Land Management .............................................................. 1-5 1.4.2. United States Forest Service ................................................................ 1-5 1.5. Plan Conformance .............................................................................................. 1-5 1.5.1. Applicable Laws and Executive Orders .............................................. 1-6 1.6. Scoping and Issues ............................................................................................. 1-6 1.6.1. Internal Scoping .................................................................................. 1-6 1.6.2. External Scoping ................................................................................. 1-6 1.6.3. Resource Issues Identified ................................................................... 1-7 1.7. Tribal Consultation ............................................................................................. 1-7 Chapter 2. Proposed Action and Alternatives ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1. Description of Proposed Action ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1. Access to Project Facilities .................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2. Work Areas at Transmission Structures .............................................. 2-1 2.2. No Action Alternative ........................................................................................ 2-5 2.3. Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Avoidance Alternatives ................... 2-5 2.3.1. Alternative 1 – Approximately 1.6-mile BLM .................................... 2-5 2.3.2. Alternative 2 – Approximately 2.8-mile BLM and State Land ........... 2-5 2.4. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ...................... 2-5 2.5. Proposed Action Improvements and Activities .................................................. 2-8 2.5.1. Expected Operations and Maintenance Activities ............................... 2-8 2.5.2. Access Roads ....................................................................................... 2-8 2.5.3. Structure Work Areas ........................................................................ 2-11 2.5.4. Staffing and Safety ............................................................................ 2-12 2.5.5. Right-of-Way Considerations ............................................................ 2-13 2.5.6. Termination and Restoration ............................................................. 2-13 2.5.7. Design Features ................................................................................. 2-14 2.6. Summary of Proposed Action .......................................................................... 2-18 Chapter 3. Affected Environment ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1. Project Resource Review .................................................................................... 3-1 3.2. Earth Resources .................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2. Affected Environment ......................................................................... 3-3 3.3. Paleontological Resources ................................................................................ 3-11 3.3.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-11 3.3.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-12 3.4. Water Resources ............................................................................................... 3-15 3.4.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-15 3.4.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-15 AIP Access Roads Permitting Project Final EA i 10/12/2016 3.5. Biological Resources ........................................................................................ 3-19 3.5.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-19 3.5.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-19 3.6. Wildland Fire .................................................................................................... 3-39 3.6.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-39 3.6.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-40 3.7. Land Uses ......................................................................................................... 3-40 3.7.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-40 3.7.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-41 3.8. Special Designation Areas ................................................................................ 3-46 3.8.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-46 3.8.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-46 3.9. Recreation ......................................................................................................... 3-49 3.9.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-49 3.9.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-49 3.10. Visual Resources .............................................................................................. 3-50 3.10.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-50 3.10.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-64 3.10.3. BLM VRI Classifications .................................................................. 3-65 3.10.4. Agency Management Objectives ....................................................... 3-66 3.11. Cultural Resources and Tribal Concerns .......................................................... 3-66 3.11.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-66 3.11.2. Culture History .................................................................................. 3-67 3.11.3. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-82 3.11.4. Inventoried Cultural Resource Sites .................................................. 3-83 3.11.5. Cultural Resource Sites on BLM Land ............................................. 3-83 3.11.6. Cultural Resource Sites on Forest Service Land ............................... 3-84 3.11.7. Cultural Resource Sites on NMSLO and Private Land ..................... 3-85 3.11.8. Definition of the Area of Potential Effects ........................................ 3-86 3.12. Air Quality and Climate ................................................................................... 3-87 3.12.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-87 3.12.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-87 3.13. Livestock Grazing ............................................................................................ 3-90 3.13.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-90 3.13.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-90 Chapter 4. Environmental Effects ............................................................................................ 4-1 4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1. Impact Assessment Methodology ....................................................... 4-1 4.1.2. Cumulative Impacts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology and Mineral Deposits of Lake Valley Quadrangle, Grant, Luna, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico
    BULLETIN 37 Geology and Mineral Deposits of Lake Valley Quadrangle, Grant, Luna, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico BY HENRY L. JICHA, JR. Stratigraphy and structure of sedimentary and volcanic rocks and descriptions of mining districts 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ............ Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley .......................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts ........................................................... Albuquerque Holm O. Bursum, Jr. ................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ............................................................ Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ............................................................ Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz .............................................................................. Hobbs FRONTISPIECE VIEW OF LAKE VALLEY (circa 1905). TOWN OF LAKE VALLEY IN THE LAST DAYS OF THE SILVER BOOM. COMPARE WITH PLATE 2-A. Picture by Henry Schmidt, from the collection of Ray- mond Schmidt. Contents Page ABSTRACT ........................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 2 Geography and physiography ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Petrography and Stratigraphy of Seville-Trident Exploration Wells Near Deming, New Mexico
    Petrographyandstratigraphy 0fSeville-Trident exploration wells near Deming,New Mexico byBusse// E. Clemons,Professor of geology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003 Abstract Methods Petrographicanalyses of cuttingsfrom four wildcatoil andgas exploration Well cuttings of varied intervalswere washed and scannedunder wellsdrilled by Seville-TridentCorp. near Deming, New Mexico,from 1981 a binocularmicroscope. The selectedintervals depended on the col- to 1983are reported. Thickness of upperTertiary-Quaternary basinfill south- lectionintervals available, types of lithologiespresent in the cuttings, eastof Demingis interpretedto be about4,000 ft. Basin-fillsediments overlie in lithologies.Eighty-five about5,000 ft of Miocene-Oligocenevolcaniclastic rocks and ash-flowtuffs. and bracketingdistinctive changes petro- TheMiocene-Oligocene rocks overlie up to 3,600ft of RubioPeak Formation (Eocene),which is intrudedby a fine-crystallinequartz monzonite The No. 2 City of Demingwell was drilled to a depth of 12,385ft and bottomedin o/ RubioPeak Formation. The o^ No. 1 McSherrywell wasdrilled to a depthof -1 tttl, 12,495ft, but cuttingsare available only to 12,430ft. About300 ft of probable 2r- PaleoceneLobo Formation is interpretedbeneath the RubioPeak Formation -A andabove about 570 ft of Precambrianmetamorphic rocks. The No. I Hurt z :: Hill Ranchwell, westof Deming,is reportedto have6een drilled to a totaldepth ,. t- of 7,723ft. About 2,300ft of basinfill, 4,800ft of Tertiaryvolcanic roiks intrudedby rhyolite of Red Mountain,and M0 ft of El Paio Dolomiteare \1, representedin the cuttings(deepest cuttings studied were from 7,640ft). Silve Introduction Seville-Trident Corp., of Carlsbad, California, drilled five wildcat oil and gas exploration wells in central Luna County from 198Lto 1983(Fig. 1.).All were completedas dry holes and no shows of oil Big Eurro j MrsMfs ,.='lr f+'$.X.{r,o.*'"""",-2/S.{fii| t,,i.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Caballo fault, Williamsburg section (Class A) No. 2088a Last Review Date: 2016-03-30 Compiled in cooperation with the New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources citation for this record: Machette, M.N., and Jochems, A.P., compilers, 2016, Fault number 2088a, Caballo fault, Williamsburg section, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 02:22 PM. Synopsis General: This down-to-the-west normal fault bounds the north- trending, east-tilted Caballo block, south of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. The fault forms part of the eastern margin of the Palomas Basin, an eastward-tilted, sediment-filled half graben. The fault probably began to uplift the Caballo Mountains in the Miocene, but uplift continued into the Pliocene and Quaternary. The geometry and general movement history of the fault suggest that it has four discrete sections: Holocene fault scarps are present on the Williamsburg (northwestern) and central sections of the Caballo fault. Deposits of the Palomas Formation sections of the Caballo fault. Deposits of the Palomas Formation (Pliocene-Pleistocene) and middle Pleistocene to Holocene piedmont-slope deposits are offset along the Williamsburg and central sections of the fault. The northern and southern parts of the fault appear to be of pre-Quaternary age, and thus are not included in the following discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest NM Publication List
    Southwest New Mexico Publication Inventory Draft Source of Document/Search Purchase Topic Category Keywords County Title Author Date Publication/Journal/Publisher Type of Document Method Price Geology 1 Geology geology, seismic Southwestern NM Six regionally extensive upper-crustal Ackermann, H.D., L.W. 1994 U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 94- Electronic file USGS publication search refraction profiles, seismic refraction profiles in Southwest New Pankratz, D.P. Klein 695 (DJVU) http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/ southwestern New Mexico ofr/ofr94695 Mexico, 2 Geology Geology, Southwestern NM Magmatism and metamorphism at 1.46 Ga in Amato, J.M., A.O. 2008 In New Mexico Geological Society Fall Field Paper in Book http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/g $45.00 magmatism, the Burro Mountains, southwestern New Boullion, and A.E. Conference Guidebook - 59, Geology of the Gila uidebooks/59/ metamorphism, Mexico Sanders Wilderness-Silver City area, 107-116. Burro Mountains, southwestern New Mexico 3 Geology Geology, mineral Catron County Geology and mineral resources of York Anderson, O.J. 1986 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Electronic file (PDF) NMBGMR search $10.00 for resources, York Ranch SE quadrangle, Cibola and Catron Resources Open File Report 220A, 22 pages. <http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publicatio CD Ranch, Fence Counties, New Mexico ns/openfile/details.cfml?Volume=2 Lake, Catron, 20A> Cibola 4 Geology Geology, Zuni Salt Catron County Geology of the Zuni Salt Lake 7 1/2 Minute Anderson, O.J. 1994 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook Contains Preliminary Findings of a Number of Concurrent Projects Being Worked on by the Trip Leaders
    TH FRIENDS OF THE PLEISTOCENE, ROCKY MOUNTAIN-CELL, 45 FIELD CONFERENCE PLIO-PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL PART OF THE ALBUQUERQUE BASIN OCTOBER 12-14, 2001 SEAN D. CONNELL New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources-Albuquerque Office, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2808 Central Ave. SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 DAVID W. LOVE New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 JOHN D. SORRELL Tribal Hydrologist, Pueblo of Isleta, P.O. Box 1270, Isleta, NM 87022 J. BRUCE J. HARRISON Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 Open-File Report 454C and D Initial Release: October 11, 2001 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 NMBGMR OFR454 C & D INTRODUCTION This field-guide accompanies the 45th annual Rocky Mountain Cell of the Friends of the Pleistocene (FOP), held at Isleta Lakes, New Mexico. The Friends of the Pleistocene is an informal gathering of Quaternary geologists, geomorphologists, and pedologists who meet annually in the field. The field guide has been separated into two parts. Part C (open-file report 454C) contains the three-days of road logs and stop descriptions. Part D (open-file report 454D) contains a collection of mini-papers relevant to field-trip stops. This field guide is a companion to open-file report 454A and 454B, which accompanied a field trip for the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain/South Central Section of the Geological Society of America, held in Albuquerque in late April.
    [Show full text]
  • Overkill, Glacial History, and the Extinction of North America's Ice Age Megafauna
    PERSPECTIVE Overkill, glacial history, and the extinction of North America’s Ice Age megafauna PERSPECTIVE David J. Meltzera,1 Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved September 23, 2020 (received for review July 21, 2020) The end of the Pleistocene in North America saw the extinction of 38 genera of mostly large mammals. As their disappearance seemingly coincided with the arrival of people in the Americas, their extinction is often attributed to human overkill, notwithstanding a dearth of archaeological evidence of human predation. Moreover, this period saw the extinction of other species, along with significant changes in many surviving taxa, suggesting a broader cause, notably, the ecological upheaval that occurred as Earth shifted from a glacial to an interglacial climate. But, overkill advocates ask, if extinctions were due to climate changes, why did these large mammals survive previous glacial−interglacial transitions, only to vanish at the one when human hunters were present? This question rests on two assumptions: that pre- vious glacial−interglacial transitions were similar to the end of the Pleistocene, and that the large mammal genera survived unchanged over multiple such cycles. Neither is demonstrably correct. Resolving the cause of large mammal extinctions requires greater knowledge of individual species’ histories and their adaptive tolerances, a fuller understanding of how past climatic and ecological changes impacted those animals and their biotic communities, and what changes occurred at the Pleistocene−Holocene boundary that might have led to those genera going extinct at that time. Then we will be able to ascertain whether the sole ecologically significant difference between previous glacial−interglacial transitions and the very last one was a human presence.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Late Pliocene-Pleistocene Glaciation
    13. LATE PLIOCENE - PLEISTOCENE GLACIATION W. A. Berggren, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts The discussion in this chapter is broken down into two increase in the former exceeding that of the latter; or parts: the first deals with glaciation in the North Atlantic as (v) less detritals, clay and carbonate deposited per unit time revealed in the data obtained on Leg 12; in the second part (that is, decreased sedimentation rate) with the decrease in an attempt is made to provide a chronologic framework of the latter exceeding the former. In view of the demon- Late Pliocene-Pleistocene glaciation and to correlate gla- strable increase in sedimentation rate above the preglacial/ cial/interglacial sequences as recorded in land and deep-sea glacial boundary at Sites 111, 112 and 116 due to increased sediments. amounts of detrital minerals and the fact that glacial periods in high latitudes are characterized by a carbonate GLACIATION IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC minimum (Mclntyre et al., in press) it can be seen that the One of the most significant aspects of Leg 12 was the correct explanation for the increase in natural gamma activ- various results which were obtained regarding glaciation in ity in the glacial part of the section is rather complex. Thin the North Atlantic. Glacial sediments were encountered at bands of carbonate were found at various levels intercalated all sites in the North Atlantic with the exception of Site with detrital-rich clays which indicates interglacial intervals, 117 (for the purpose of this discussion the North Atlantic so that the correct explanation probably lies with (iii) encompasses Sites 111 through 117; Sites 118 and 119 are above.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 1997 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cover: View looking south to the east side of the northeastern Organ Mountains near Augustin Pass, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Town of White Sands in distance. (Photo by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, 1995.) MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO By SUSAN BARTSCH-WINKLER, Editor ____________________________________________________ U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 97-521 U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Shaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Service Center Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO Susan Bartsch-Winkler, Editor Summary Mimbres Resource Area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province of southwestern New Mexico that includes generally north- to northwest-trending mountain ranges composed of uplifted, faulted, and intruded strata ranging in age from Precambrian to Recent.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliocene and Early Pleistocene) Faunas from New Mexico
    Chapter 12 Mammalian Biochronology of Blancan and Irvingtonian (Pliocene and Early Pleistocene) Faunas from New Mexico GARY S. MORGAN1 AND SPENCER G. LUCAS2 ABSTRACT Signi®cant mammalian faunas of Pliocene (Blancan) and early Pleistocene (early and medial Irvingtonian) age are known from the Rio Grande and Gila River valleys of New Mexico. Fossiliferous exposures of the Santa Fe Group in the Rio Grande Valley, extending from the EspanÄola basin in northern New Mexico to the Mesilla basin in southernmost New Mexico, have produced 21 Blancan and 6 Irvingtonian vertebrate assemblages; three Blancan faunas occur in the Gila River Valley in the Mangas and Duncan basins in southwestern New Mexico. More than half of these faunas contain ®ve or more species of mammals, and many have associated radioisotopic dates and/or magnetostratigraphy, allowing for correlation with the North American land-mammal biochronology. Two diverse early Blancan (4.5±3.6 Ma) faunas are known from New Mexico, the Truth or Consequences Local Fauna (LF) from the Palomas basin and the Buckhorn LF from the Mangas basin. The former contains ®ve species of mammals indicative of the early Blancan: Borophagus cf. B. hilli, Notolagus lepusculus, Neo- toma quadriplicata, Jacobsomys sp., and Odocoileus brachyodontus. Associated magnetostra- tigraphic data suggest correlation with either the Nunivak or Cochiti Subchrons of the Gilbert Chron (4.6±4.2 Ma), which is in accord with the early Blancan age indicated by the mam- malian biochronology. The Truth or Consequences LF is similar in age to the Verde LF from Arizona, and slightly older than the Rexroad 3 and Fox Canyon faunas from Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to Other North American Proboscidean Taxa
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2019 Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa Brenna Hart-Farrar East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Paleobiology Commons Recommended Citation Hart-Farrar, Brenna, "Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3680. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3680 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Manus Descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa _________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences _________________________________ by Brenna J. Hart-Farrar December 2019 _________________________________ Steven C. Wallace, Chair Chris. Widga Blaine W. Schubert Keywords: Gray Fossil Site, Mammut, Mastodon, Morphology, Manus ABSTRACT Manus descriptions of an Undescribed Mastodon from the Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, with Comparisons to other North American Proboscidean Taxa by Brenna J.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela Fossils Using Linear
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2014 Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black- footed Ferret Conservation Nathaniel S. Fox III East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Nathaniel S. III, "Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2339. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2339 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation _______________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences _______________________________________ by Nathaniel S. Fox May 2014 _______________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Wallace, Chair Dr. Jim I. Mead Dr. Blaine W. Schubert Keywords: Mustela, weasels, morphometrics, classification, conservation, Pleistocene, Holocene ABSTRACT Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation by Nathaniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Jane E. Jenness, Kurt Roggensack, and David A. Lopez
    DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WRIR 83-4118-F MAP SHOWING OUTCROPS OF PRE-QUATERNARY ASH-FLOW TUFF AND LAHARIC BRECCIA, BASIN AND RANGE PROVINCE, NEW MEXICO Compiled by Jane E. Jenness, Kurt Roggensack, and David A. Lopez INTRODUCTION This map report is one of a series of geologic and hydrologic maps covering all or parts of States within the Basin and Range province of the' western United States. The map reports in this series contain detailed information on the geohydrology of the province, including the ground-water hydrology, ground-water quality, surface distribution of selected rock types, tectonic conditions, areal geophysics, Pleistocene lakes and marshes, and mineral and energy resources. This work is a part of the U.S. Geological Survey's program for geologic and hydrologic evaluation of the Basin and Range province to identify prospective regions for further study relative to isolation of high-level nuclear waste (Bedinger, Sargent, and Reed, 1984). This map report was prepared from published geologic maps and reports utilizing the project guidelines defined in Sargent and Bedinger (1984). The map shows the known occurrences of pre-Quaternary ash-flow tuff and laharic breccia and associated tuff breccia and agglomerate. The Description of Map Units includes the geologic age, radiometric age, if available, the lithology, thickness where available, and sources of data for the tuffs and laharic breccias in outlined and numbered areas in the counties of the study area. The radiometric ages do not necessarily represent the entire age range of the geologic units. Nomenclature of the geologic units in this map report is from published reports and does not necessarily conform to U.S.
    [Show full text]