Abundance of Raptors and Habitat Preferences of the Common Buzzard Buteo Buteo and the Common Kestrel Falco Tinnunculus During T

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abundance of Raptors and Habitat Preferences of the Common Buzzard Buteo Buteo and the Common Kestrel Falco Tinnunculus During T Slovak Raptor Journal 2013, 7: 37–42. DOI: 10.2478/srj-2013-0007. © Raptor Protection ofSlovakia (RPS) Abundance of raptors and habitat preferences of the common buzzard Buteo buteo and the common kestrel Falco tinnunculus during the non-breeding season in an agricultural landscape (western Slovakia) Abundancia dravcov a využívanie a preferencia biotopov myšiakom lesným Buteo buteo a sokolom myšiarom Falco tinnunculus počas nehniezdnej sezóny v poľnohospodárskej krajine (západné Slovensko) Vladimír NEMČEK Abstract: Habitat use and preferences by raptors were studied during three non-breeding seasons (2011–2013) in an agricultural landscape in western Slovakia. The non-breeding season on agricultural land showed high variation and changes in the cover of habitats related to human activities. The most abundant raptor species were the common buzzard Buteo buteo (L.) (152 indivi- duals) and the common kestrel Falco tinnunculus (L.) (78 individuals). The common buzzard preferred alfalfa and avoided ploughed fields. The common kestrel showed a high habitat preference for alfalfa, corn fields, stubbles and fallow. It also avoided ploughed fields and wheat. Abstrakt: Počas troch mimohniezdnych sezón (2011–2013) bolo skúmané využívanie a preferencia biotopov dravcami v poľ- nohospodárskej krajine na západnom Slovensku. Mimohniezdna sezóna v poľnohospodárskej krajine preukázala vysokú variáciu a zmeny v pokrytí biotopov vo vzťahu k ľudským činnostiam. Najpočetnejším druhom dravcov boli myšiak lesný Buteo buteo (L.) (152 jedincov) a sokol myšiar Falco tinnunculus (L.) (78 jedincov). Myšiak lesný preferoval biotopy s lucernou a vyhýbal sa zoraným poliam. Sokol myšiar preukázal vysokú biotopovú preferenciu pre lucernu, kukuricu, strniská a úhory. Tiež sa vyhýbal zoraným poliam a pšenici. Key words: landscape, agricultural land Vladimír Nemček, Raptor Protection of Slovakia, Kuklovská 5, SK–841 04 Bratislava, [email protected]. Acknowledgments: This study was supported by the international project Conservation of Raptors and Owls – Slovakia – Austria CORO-SKAT according to European Regional Development Fund within the Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Slovakia – Austria 2007–2013. I would like to thank Raptor Protection of Slovakia for the opportunity to work on this project. Introduction 1980). It breeds on trees and cliffs (Sergio et al. 2002). During the non-breeding season raptors often have diffe- This species inhabits a great variety of landscapes but rent habitat and environment requirements than they have mainly mosaics of woodland and agricultural areas during the breeding season. Limitations in this period are (Bijlsma 1997). It is a typical perch-hunting predator. Its food resources and habitats where prey is available main prey consists of small mammals, lagomorphs, (MacArthur & Pianka 1966, Newton 1998). birds, reptiles and worms (Mebs 1964, Graham et al. A number of studies were carried out during the 1995, Kenward et al. 2001, Sergio et al. 2002, Šotnár winter months involving the counting of wintering rap- & Obuch 2009). The population of the common buzzard tors and recognizing their habitat use (Ševčík 1995, in the non-breeding period is formed of birds wintering Wuczynski 2003, Nikolov et al. 2006, Schindler et al. in Central Europe (Northern populations) and of the lo- 2012, Baltag et al. 2013). Habitats in agricultural land cal non-migrating population (Cepák et al. 2008). Du- rapidly change during autumn and winter, because ring winter the species is strongly connected to open fields are ploughed and also cropped. The agricultural habitats (Danko et al. 2002). landscape is composed of important foraging habitats The common kestrel is also a common species in for raptors hunting in open areas. Europe (Village 2010). It nests in trees, on buildings and The common buzzard is the most abundant bird of close to pastures, grasslands, agricultural land and in prey in the Western Palaearctic (Cramp & Simmons built-up areas (O’Connor 1982, Aviles et al. 2001). The 37 Nemček V: Abundance of raptors and habitat preferences of the common buzzard Buteo buteo and the common kestrel Falco tinnunculus during the non-breeding season in an agricultural landscape (western Slovakia) dominant prey of this species is composed of small sunflowers, ploughed fields and stubbles. Beet and rape mammals, insects and birds (Korpimäki 1985, Darolová were merged into a single category because of the very 1989, Van Zyl 1994, Gil-Delgado et al. 1995, Valkama small area of beet. The highest habitat diversity was et al. 1995, Romanowski 1996, Piattella et al. 1999, recorded in September (Shannon index = 1.57). In Sándor 1999, Salvati 2002, Souttou et al. 2006, Noga autumn, the landscape was more diverse due to the hig- & Kečkéšová 2008). her cover of stubbles and fallow. The lowest values were The primary aim of the present study was to recon- recorded during the winter months. Winter habitats were sider the relationships between raptors and agricultural predominantly formed of ploughed fields and wheat. habitats during the non-breeding season. I tested the The size of field parts ranged from 0.3 to 143.6 ha. hypothesis that raptors use habitats in the agricultural landscape in proportion to the habitat coverage. D a t a c o l l e c t i o n The raptor counting was performed during the non- Material and methods breeding season from 2011 to 2013 (twice in November S t u d y a r e a and December of 2011, four times in January, Septem- The study was carried out in an open, agricultural area ber, November and December of 2012 and once in of the Podunajská pahorkatina Hills (17° 31’ 00’’ E, 48° March of 2013).The field work was carried out between 16’ 26’’ N). The area covers 18.7 km2, and the average September and March. Each counting started at 10 a. m. altitude is between 125–140 m. The major habitat is and only when the weather conditions were with no arable land with windbreaks (Table 1). Habitats change snow cover, fog, rainfall or strong wind (over 10 m/s). during the year in the area. The study area is a part of The visibility was often low in the early mornings the special protection area (SPA) Ulanska mokrad (NA- because of the fog. It often lasted until 10 a. m. The TURA 2000), which protects raptor species, such as the temperature did not fall below 0°C. The field method saker falcon (Falco cherrug), the Montagu’s harrier used was the point transect (Gibbons and Gregory (Circus pygargus), the black kite (Milvus migrans) and 2006). A total of 7 counting points were established. the red-footed falcon (Falco vespertinus). Points were located 700–1300 m apart and with the go- od view of the area. A binocular (10×42) was used to H a b i t a t s a v a i l a b i l i t y search for raptors and a monocular (30×65) for identify- Habitat categories were recorded with a GPS unit (Gar- ing raptors. Raptors were recorded within two kilomet- min eTrex 10) and a camera during the counting of the res. The habitat category was added only when I was number of raptors. For each counting habitats were sure where the raptor was hunting. The average distance recorded by making photo documentation from the between the counting points was 800 m. Each point was counting points. These were translated into GIS layers. sampled for 20 minutes. Only hunting birds of prey we- Eight habitat categories were classified in the monito- re selected for the study. I identified hunting birds as ring area – alfalfa, corn, fallow, wheat, beet & rape, birds perched on trees or on the ground, hunting with Tab. 1 . The cover of the habitats in the study area [%]. A – average, H’ – Shannon diversity index. Tab. 1 . Pokryvnosť biotopov v skúmanej oblasti [%]. A – priemer, H’ – Shannonov index diverzity. 2011 201 2 201 3 habitat type XI XII I IX XI XII III A alfalfa 4.2 3.2 3.2 6.6 8.8 8.8 8.8 6.2 corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 .7 rape and beet 9.8 7.4 7.4 0.0 3.36 3.4 3.4 5.0 wheat 42.9 42.9 42.9 0.0 35.2 35.1 35.1 33.4 ploughed field 22.3 43.6 46.2 41 .2 51 .6 51 .6 51 .6 44.0 stubbles 20.1 2.6 0.0 1 9.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 6.3 fallow 0.4 0.0 0.0 1 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 sunflower 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 H’ 1 .41 1 .1 2 1 .02 1 .57 1 .08 1 .08 1 .08 38 Slovak Raptor Journal 2013, 7: 37–42. DOI: 10.2478/srj-2013-0007. © Raptor Protection ofSlovakia (RPS) a hovering flight or circling, gliding with a prey attack. habitat preference of the common buzzard and of the Other types of flight (circling, gliding, direct flight wit- common kestrel. These species were the most common hout an attack) were not considered as hunting. I assig- raptors in this area. Data were analysed independently ned a category to the habitat where each individual for each species because of the slightly different habitat raptor was hunting. In the case of a flying raptor, I as- requirements of each species (Butet et al. 2010). Habitat signed the category of the habitat over which it was fly- diversity was calculated with the Shannon Diversity ing. All individual birds were recorded only once when Index. they were observed for the first time. Birds perched on trees between two habitats were assigned to the habitat Results being monitored by the raptor.
Recommended publications
  • Rock Kestrel
    264 Falconidae: falcons and kestrels brooding young. Therefore the small increase in reporting rates in six of the eight Zones during winter is probably related to seasonal changes in conspicuousness, rather than to any large- scale influx of migrants from outside the region. Reporting rates for the Tarkastad district, for example, increased during winter, while direct observation showed that over half of the population actually left the area (Van Zyl 1994b). Although the models do not suggest movements within southern Africa, a more detailed analysis of Rock Kestrel movements in South Africa, largely based on a more refined examination of atlas reporting rates, suggested a northerly and easterly movement away from south- western breeding areas during winter (Van Zyl et al. 1994). Breeding: Breeding was recorded in all Zones, mainly September–January, peaking October–December. There are no obvious seasonal differences between the Zones, although in the eastern Cape Province (Zone 8) it bred slightly later than in the rest of the region. Interspecific relationships: It overlaps widely with Greater and Lesser Kestrels in southern Africa. It moves into the eastern grassland habitats most exploited by the Lesser Kestrel during the winter when that species is absent (Van Zyl et al. 1994). Historical distribution and conservation: Boshoff et al. (1983) found no difference in distribution in the Cape Prov- ince, comparing the periods 1700–1969 and 1970–79. The distrib- ution map similarly shows no change in distribution, the species being largely absent from the central Kalahari regions and the far northeast during all three time periods, although the map shows Rock Kestrel many more records from the western Karoo, presumably due to Rooivalk better coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Systematics and Evolution of Kestrels
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47062-9 — The Kestrel David Costantini , Giacomo Dell'Omo Excerpt More Information 1 Systematics and Evolution of Kestrels 1.1 Chapter Summary The family Falconidae constitutes a group of small to medium-sized diurnal raptors whose monophyly is strongly supported. Kestrels are included in the subfamily Falconinae. There are at least 13 species that belong to the kestrel group, but recent genetic studies suggest that the number of kestrel species might be larger, possibly 16. The paleontological and molecular evidence is congruent in suggesting an evolutionary radiation of kestrels from the Late Miocene (4.0–9.8 million years ago) through the Early Pleistocene. However, the geographic area where kestrels originated and dispersed from is unclear. 1.2 Diversification of Falcons The Falconidae is a monophyletic family of diurnal birds of prey that occupy a wide variety of ecological niches and geographic regions (White et al., 1994). Three subfamilies are currently recognised and their validity is supported by both molecular and morphological data (Griffiths, 1999; Griffiths et al., 2004; Fuchs et al., 2012, 2015): (i) Falconinae (falcons, falconets and kestrels), (ii) Herpetotherinae (forest falcons Micrastur sp. and laughing falcon Herpetotheres cachinnans) and (iii) Polyborinae (caracaras) (Figure 1.1). Dickinson (2003) has recognised 11 genera and 64 species of Falconidae, but figures can vary slightly across authors. Both the Herpetotherinae and the Polyborinae occur only in the New World, while the Falconinae (the subfamily to which kestrels belong) are widespread across both the New and Old World with 46 species, 40 of which belong to the genus Falco (Fuchs et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Kestrel, Also Known As the European Or Eurasian Kestrel, Are One of the Smaller Members of the Falcon Family
    The common kestrel, also known as the European or Eurasian kestrel, are one of the smaller members of the falcon family. They measure just over 30cm in length, and may weigh as little as 150g (5 ½ ounces). They are a native species to Britain, and can be identified by the way they ‘hover’ in place mid-air. Currently in the UK, a population of just under 50,000 breeding pairs are estimated. However, this number is falling rapidly. In some areas, numbers have declined by up to 70% in the last 25 years. This shows how important ⮝ Tinker, Huxley’s male kestrel, conservation efforts need to be to who you can fly with us protect kestrels and other species. during our displays! SCIENTIFIC NAME Falco tinnunculus DISTRIBUTION UK, Europe, Asia WILD POPULATION 50,000 UK pairs estimated, declining WINGSPAN Approx. 70 to 80cm SIZE & WEIGHT Approx. 30 to 36 long, 150g to 250g MAXIMUM LIFESPAN Up to 15 years in the wild, longer in captivity MAIN DIET Small mammals: voles and mice Apart from the UK, common kestrels are found across most of Europe, parts of Asia and, during migration, as far as southern Africa! As a juvenile, their plumage is mostly brown with black streaks on the feathers. As the male matures, this develops into a stunning bronze, and the head and tail turn almost silver in colouration. Females remain more reddish- brown in comparison to the male. Colour in this kestrel! Is it a male or a female? Use this code to decipher some kestrel facts! A = A B = B C = C D = D E = E F = F G = G H = H I = I J = J K = K L = L M = M N = N O = O P = P Q = Q R = R S = S T = T ⮝ Turbo, Huxley’s female kestrel, U = U V = V W = W X = X who you can also meet in our displays! Y = Y Z = Z HUNT LARGE INSECTS ON FOOT They may ____ _____ _______ __ ____ .
    [Show full text]
  • Food Niche Overlap of Avian Predators (Falconiformes, Strigiformes) in a Field and Forest Mosaic in Central Poland
    animals Article Food Niche Overlap of Avian Predators (Falconiformes, Strigiformes) in a Field and Forest Mosaic in Central Poland Jakub Gryz 1,* and Dagny Krauze-Gryz 2 1 Department of Forest Ecology, Forest Research Institute, S˛ekocin Stary, Braci Le´snej3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland 2 Department of Forest Zoology and Wildlife Management, Institute of Forest Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-22-7150-419 Simple Summary: Predators may present various feeding strategies, i.e., being either food specialists or opportunists. At the same time, their diets change to reflect the prey availability and to avoid competition for food resources. We performed this research in a highly transformed field and forest mosaic and in an area with a high abundance of avian predators (owls and birds of prey, ~133 breeding pairs in total). We calculated the food niche overlap statistics to show the competition for food resources between coexisting species. We assessed the diet composition on the basis of pellet analyses and the identification of prey remains collected from under nests during the breeding season. The food niches overlapped moderately with only one exception, i.e., the highest niche overlap was recorded for the common buzzard and common kestrel, two species preying in open spaces on field rodents but switching to soricomorphs when the former were scarce. On the contrary, the most separate food niche was that of the white-tailed eagle, which was the only species regularly preying on fish. Our results showed that the food niches of species coexisting in the same area were considerably separate, which is due to the fact that they prey on various prey species or search for them in different habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use of Common Kestrel
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2014; 2 (5): 134-137 ISSN 2320-7078 Habitat use of common kestrel (Falconiformes: JEZS 2014; 2 (5): 134-137 © 2014 JEZS Falconidae) during winter season, from Eastern Received: 23-08-2014 Accepted: 06-09-2014 Romania Emanuel Ştefan. Baltag Department of Zoology, Faculty of Emanuel Ştefan. Baltag, Viorel Pocora, Lucian Eugen Bolboacă and Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, B-dul Carol I, Lucian Sfîcă no. 20A, 700505, Romania. Abstract Viorel Pocora The habitat use and weather influence for Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) wintering population of Department of Zoology, Faculty of Eastern Romania was studied. During cold period common kestrel use pasture and herbaceous vegetation Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” (wi = 2.48) and strongly avoid closed habitats, as fruit tree plantations, vineyards and natural and University of Iași, B-dul Carol I, artificial forests. Common kestrel tends to maintain the same hunting area for the entire cold season. no. 20A, 700505, Romania. They use the same place and also, their number and sex composition was relatively constant during winter months. Regarding GLM analysis, it has shown that the number of common kestrels is Lucian Eugen Bolboacă independent of weather-related variables, altitude and distance to the nearest settlement. This “Vasile Goldiș” Western independence can be explained by their preference to the same hunting area. Common kestrels do not University of Arad, Bulevardul depend on agricultural management during cold season but, they are influenced by pasture and Revoluției 94-96, Romania herbaceous association areas, as they use the same hunting sites during whole season.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet Composition of Common Kestrels Falco Tinnunculus and Long-Eared Owls Asio Otus Coexisting in an Urban Environment
    Ornis Fennica 86:123130. 2009 Diet composition of Common Kestrels Falco tinnunculus and Long-eared Owls Asio otus coexisting in an urban environment Jan Riegert*, Matìj Lövy & Drahomíra Fainová J. Riegert, M. Lövy & D. Fainová, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of SouthBohemia, Braniovská 31, CZ-370 05 Èeské Budìjovice, CzechRepublic; *cor - respondent authors e-mail [email protected] Received 14 April 2009, accepted 21 September 2009 We studied the dietary composition of urban populations of Common Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) and Long-eared Owls (Asio otus) under fluctuating vole abundance in Èeské Budìjovice during 20022005. Common Voles were the dominant prey. In poor vole years, the dietary proportion of alternative prey increased in both species. Long-eared Owls fed more on mice and related rodents, whereas the Common Kestrels diet shifted to insects. The different alternative diets may be due to species-specific daily activity, hunt- ing techniques and/or hunting habitats. Furthermore, we examined the possible relation- ship between the distance from a nest to the city centre and the proportion of voles in the diet. The Kestrel diet was not markedly influenced by distance, but for Long-eared Owls an increasing distance was associated with an increasing dietary proportion of voles. 1. Introduction In farmland habitats both species primarily feed on small rodents, especially Microtinae voles The Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus)and (Village 1981, Village 1990, Korpimäki 1992). Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) are two raptor species However, the urban environment differs from that have successfully moved into urban habitats. farmland, for example, in being free of large pred- The Common Kestrel is the most frequent diurnal ators such as the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo,byin- bird of prey in the cities of Central Europe (Riegert creased threat from humans and by increased (or 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Sounds Confidential
    BIRD SPECIES RECORDINGS: FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION! PART # UNIT TYPE SPECIES PART # UNIT TYPE SPECIES EUROPEAN STARLING (Sturnus vulgaris) LAUGHING GULL (Larus atricilla) For use with #1 CHIP AMERICAN ROBIN (Turdus migratorius) For use with #2 CHIP RING-BILLED GULL (Larus delawarensis) #0033, Standard HOUSE FINCH (Carpodacus mexicanus) #0033, Marine HERRING GULL (Larus argentatus) #0035, RING-BILLED GULL (Larus delawarensis) #0035, CALIFORNIA GULL (Larus californicus) #0041 657-0107-00 COMMON GRACKLE (Quiscalus quiscula) #0041 657-0017-00 BLACK-HEADED GULL (Larus ridibundus) #0027 & SHARP-SHINNED HAWK (Accipiter striatus) #0027 & GLAUCOUS-WINGED GULL (Larus glaucescens) #0045 BLUE JAY (Cyanocitta cristata) #0045 DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANT (Phalacrocorax auritus) RED-WINGED BLACKBIRD (Agelaius phoeniceus) NORTHERN HARRIER (Circus cyaneus) EUROPEAN STARLING (Sturnus vulgaris) EUROPEAN STARLING (Sturnus vulgaris) For use with #3 CHIP EURASIAN BLACKBIRD (Turdus merula) For use with #4 CHIP EURASIAN BLACKBIRD (Turdus merula) #0033, AMERICAN ROBIN (Turdus migratorius) #0033, AMERICAN ROBIN (Turdus migratorius) #0035, HOUSE SPARROW (Passer domesticus) #0035, HOUSE SPARROW (Passer domesticus) #0041 657-0116-00 ROOK (Corvus frugilegus) #0041 657-0019-00 ROOK (Corvus frugilegus) #0027 & COMMON GRACKLE (Quiscalus quiscula) #0027 & COMMON GRACKLE (Quiscalus quiscula) #0045 SHARP-SHINNED HAWK (Accipiter striatus) #0045 SPARROWHAWK (Accipiter nisus) PEREGRINE FALCON (Falco peregrinus) EURASIAN BUZZARD (Buteo buteo) AMERICAN CROW DISTRESS (Corvus brachyrhynchos)
    [Show full text]
  • Species Action Plan for the Lesser Kestrel Falco Naumanni in the European Union
    Species Action Plan for the lesser kestrel Falco naumanni in the European Union Revised Prepared by: On behalf of the European Commission 1 Species action plan for the lesser kestrel Falco naumanni in the European Union The revision of the action plan was commissioned by the European Commission and prepared by BirdLife International as subcontractor to the “N2K Group” in the frame of Service Contract N#070307/2007/488316/SER/B2 “Technical and scientific support in relation to the implementation of the 92/43 ‘Habitats’ and 79/409 ‘Birds’ Directives”. Compilers Ana Iñigo, SEO/BirdLife, [email protected]; Boris Barov, BirdLife International, [email protected] Contributors Beatriz Estanque Portugal LPN Bousbouras Dimitris Greece Biologist Carlos Rodríguez Spain EBD/CSIC David Serrano Spain EBD/CSIC Elena Kmetova Bulgaria Green Balkans Federation Fernando Díez Spain SOMACYL (Castilla y León) José Miguel Aparicio Spain IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM) Maurizio Sarà Italy Universita de Palermo, Dipartimento Biol. Anim. Mia Derhé UK BirdLife International Pedro Rocha Portugal ICNB Pepe Antolín Spain DEMA Philippe Pillard France LPO/BirdLife France Ricardo Gómez Calmaestra Spain DG Medio Natural y Política Forestal, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino Rigas Tsiakiris Greece HOS Rita Alcazar Portugal LPN Milestones in the Production of the Plan Workshop: 07-08 July 2010, Madrid, Spain Draft 1: 31 July 2010, submitted to the EC and Member States for consultation Draft 2: 31 March 2011, submitted to the European Commission Final version: 21 April 2011, submitted to the European Commission International Species Working Group n/a Reviews This Action Plan should be reviewed and updated every ten years (next review in 2020) unless a sudden change of the population trend requires urgent revision.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Partial Migration Strategies of Central European Raptors Based on Ring Re-Encounter Data
    Analysis of partial migration strategies of Central European raptors based on ring re-encounter data I n a u g u r a l d i s s e r t a t i o n zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald vorgelegt von Daniel Holte geboren am 06.10.1981 in Neuss Greifswald, den 14.06.201828.03.2018 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Werner Weitschies 1. Gutachter : PD Dr. Martin Haase 2. Gutachter: Dr. Sven Renner Tag der Promotion: 14.06.2018 Table of Contents A. Synopsis 7 1. General introduction 7 1.1 Marking animals 7 1.1.1 Bird ringing 8 1.2 Bird migration 10 1.2.1 Partial migration 11 1.3 Target species 11 1.3.1 Common kestrel 12 1.3.2 Common buzzard 12 1.3.3 Eurasian sparrowhawk 13 1.4 Study aims and hypotheses 13 2. Methods 15 2.1 Partial migration 15 2.2 Predicting ring re-encounters considering spatial observer heterogeneity 16 3. Results and Discussion 18 3.1 Partial migration 18 3.2 Predicting ring re-encounters considering spatial observer heterogeneity 21 4. Cited literature 25 B. Manuscripts 29 Paper I 29 Paper II 47 Paper III 65 Contributions to manuscripts 95 C. Eigenständigkeitserklärung 97 D. Curriculum Vitae 99 E. Scientific contributions 101 F. Danksagung 103 A. Synopsis 1. General introduction The history of ornithology goes far back in human history and its beginning is probably not clearly definable. Already in the fourth century B.C., Aristotle described about 140 bird species and he declared the study of birds to be a worthy activity for philosophers, which made ornithology become a science (Stresemann 1951).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Trip Report Available Here
    Ronda and the Straits – the unknown Vulture spectacle! Friday 18th October – Thursday 24th October Report by Beth Aucott www.ingloriousbustards.com Friday 18th October After an early start we arrived at Malaga airport about midday where we met Niki and the first member of our group Margaret. After introductions, the four of us set off in one of the vehicles whilst Simon met the rest of the group and it wasn’t long before we were travelling in convoy on our way to our first base, Huerta Grande - a beautiful eco-lodge snuggled into cork-oak woodland. Over a light lunch, and a glass of wine, we met the rest of the group, Alexia, Glenn, Carla, Chris and Colin as we watched Crested Tits come into the feeders. It felt bizarre to be watching these funky little birds in shorts and t-shirt when then the only time I’d seen them before had been in the snow in Scotland! We had time to settle in and have a quick wander around the grounds. Our list started to grow with sightings of Nuthatch, Short-toed Treecreeper, Long-legged Buzzard, Booted Eagle, Sand Martin, House Martin, Barn and Red-rumped Swallow. Fleeting views of Two-tailed Pasha and Geranium Bronze also went down well as welcome additions to the butterfly list. We then headed out to Punta Carnero and spent some time at a little viewpoint on the coast. From here we watched a couple of Ospreys fishing as we looked across the straits to Africa. Red-rumped Swallows and Crag Martins whizzed overhead, sharing the sky with Hobby, Sparrowhawk and Peregrine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Kestrel Population in Britain Rob Clements
    The Common Kestrel population in Britain Rob Clements Ben Green ABSTRACT Estimates of the British population of Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus suggest a continuing decline in the past 30 years, from around 100,000 pairs in the early 1970s to little more than a third of that level in the early years of this millennium.This paper summarises recent survey work in several English counties which questions recent estimates of Common Kestrel breeding density. It is suggested that the current British population remains above 50,000 territorial pairs and that, although there has been a steep decline in some parts of its range, the Common Kestrel still breeds at high density (50+ pairs per hectad) in mixed farmland in much of England. ntil recently, the Common Kestrel Falco commonest bird of prey has increasingly been tinnunculus (hereafter simply ‘Kestrel’) called into question. Uwas generally acknowledged as Britain’s most abundant raptor, its population greater Previous population estimates than that of both Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accip- In the mid 1970s, publication of the first iter nisus and Common Buzzard Buteo buteo Breeding Bird Atlas (Sharrock 1976), covering (hereafter ‘Sparrowhawk’ and ‘Buzzard’, respec- Britain and Ireland, set new standards for tively). However, the population estimate has describing population size and distribution. For been revised downwards several times over the the Kestrel, taking into account an average 75 past 30 years and the Kestrel’s status as our pairs per hectad (100 km2) in all Common 228 © British Birds 101 • May 2008 • 228–234 The Common Kestrel population in Britain maximum-number counts are of little value in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Table-Grazalema-And-Ronda.Pdf
    Common name Scientific name Grazalema and Ronda Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Y+ Red-legged Partridge Alectoris rufa Y Common Quail Coturnix coturnix S Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis Y- Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus W- Black-necked Grebe Podiceps nigricollis W Black Stork Ciconia nigra M- White Stork Ciconia ciconia M+ Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax W- Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Y- Little Egret Egretta garzetta Y- Grey Heron Ardea cinerea Y+ Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo W+ Osprey Pandion haliaetus W- Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus S+ European Honey Buzzard Pernis apivorus M+ Eurasian Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus Y+ Rüppell's Griffon Vulture Gyps rueppellii M- Eurasian Black Vulture Aegypius monachus M- Short-toed Eagle Circaetus gallicus S+ Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennata S- Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata Y- Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Y+ Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis Y- Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus S-,M+,W+ Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus M+ Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus W- Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus M- Black Kite Milvus migrans M+ Common Buzzard Buteo buteo S-,W+ Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus Y+ Eurasian Coot Fulica atra Y- Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus S- Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus W- Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius S- Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola W- Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos W- Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus W- Yellow-legged Gull Larus michahellis M- Rock Dove Columba livia Y+ Common Woodpigeon Columba palumbus
    [Show full text]