LAMOST Views $\Delta $ Scuti Pulsating Stars
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Part V Stellar Spectroscopy
Part V Stellar spectroscopy 53 Chapter 10 Classification of stellar spectra Goal-of-the-Day To classify a sample of stars using a number of temperature-sensitive spectral lines. 10.1 The concept of spectral classification Early in the 19th century, the German physicist Joseph von Fraunhofer observed the solar spectrum and realised that there was a clear pattern of absorption lines superimposed on the continuum. By the end of that century, astronomers were able to examine the spectra of stars in large numbers and realised that stars could be divided into groups according to the general appearance of their spectra. Classification schemes were developed that grouped together stars depending on the prominence of particular spectral lines: hydrogen lines, helium lines and lines of some metallic ions. Astronomers at Harvard Observatory further developed and refined these early classification schemes and spectral types were defined to reflect a smooth change in the strength of representative spectral lines. The order of the spectral classes became O, B, A, F, G, K, and M; even though these letter designations no longer have specific meaning the names are still in use today. Each spectral class is divided into ten sub-classes, so that for instance a B0 star follows an O9 star. This classification scheme was based simply on the appearance of the spectra and the physical reason underlying these properties was not understood until the 1930s. Even though there are some genuine differences in chemical composition between stars, the main property that determines the observed spectrum of a star is its effective temperature. -
Variable Star Classification and Light Curves Manual
Variable Star Classification and Light Curves An AAVSO course for the Carolyn Hurless Online Institute for Continuing Education in Astronomy (CHOICE) This is copyrighted material meant only for official enrollees in this online course. Do not share this document with others. Please do not quote from it without prior permission from the AAVSO. Table of Contents Course Description and Requirements for Completion Chapter One- 1. Introduction . What are variable stars? . The first known variable stars 2. Variable Star Names . Constellation names . Greek letters (Bayer letters) . GCVS naming scheme . Other naming conventions . Naming variable star types 3. The Main Types of variability Extrinsic . Eclipsing . Rotating . Microlensing Intrinsic . Pulsating . Eruptive . Cataclysmic . X-Ray 4. The Variability Tree Chapter Two- 1. Rotating Variables . The Sun . BY Dra stars . RS CVn stars . Rotating ellipsoidal variables 2. Eclipsing Variables . EA . EB . EW . EP . Roche Lobes 1 Chapter Three- 1. Pulsating Variables . Classical Cepheids . Type II Cepheids . RV Tau stars . Delta Sct stars . RR Lyr stars . Miras . Semi-regular stars 2. Eruptive Variables . Young Stellar Objects . T Tau stars . FUOrs . EXOrs . UXOrs . UV Cet stars . Gamma Cas stars . S Dor stars . R CrB stars Chapter Four- 1. Cataclysmic Variables . Dwarf Novae . Novae . Recurrent Novae . Magnetic CVs . Symbiotic Variables . Supernovae 2. Other Variables . Gamma-Ray Bursters . Active Galactic Nuclei 2 Course Description and Requirements for Completion This course is an overview of the types of variable stars most commonly observed by AAVSO observers. We discuss the physical processes behind what makes each type variable and how this is demonstrated in their light curves. Variable star names and nomenclature are placed in a historical context to aid in understanding today’s classification scheme. -
Calibration Against Spectral Types and VK Color Subm
Draft version July 19, 2021 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX63 Direct Measurements of Giant Star Effective Temperatures and Linear Radii: Calibration Against Spectral Types and V-K Color Gerard T. van Belle,1 Kaspar von Braun,1 David R. Ciardi,2 Genady Pilyavsky,3 Ryan S. Buckingham,1 Andrew F. Boden,4 Catherine A. Clark,1, 5 Zachary Hartman,1, 6 Gerald van Belle,7 William Bucknew,1 and Gary Cole8, ∗ 1Lowell Observatory 1400 West Mars Hill Road Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA 2California Institute of Technology, NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Mail Code 100-22 1200 East California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Systems & Technology Research 600 West Cummings Park Woburn, MA 01801, USA 4California Institute of Technology Mail Code 11-17 1200 East California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5Northern Arizona University Department of Astronomy and Planetary Science NAU Box 6010 Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA 6Georgia State University Department of Physics and Astronomy P.O. Box 5060 Atlanta, GA 30302, USA 7University of Washington Department of Biostatistics Box 357232 Seattle, WA 98195-7232, USA 8Starphysics Observatory 14280 W. Windriver Lane Reno, NV 89511, USA (Received April 18, 2021; Revised June 23, 2021; Accepted July 15, 2021) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT We calculate directly determined values for effective temperature (TEFF) and radius (R) for 191 giant stars based upon high resolution angular size measurements from optical interferometry at the Palomar Testbed Interferometer. Narrow- to wide-band photometry data for the giants are used to establish bolometric fluxes and luminosities through spectral energy distribution fitting, which allow for homogeneously establishing an assessment of spectral type and dereddened V0 − K0 color; these two parameters are used as calibration indices for establishing trends in TEFF and R. -
University Astronomy: Homework 8
University Astronomy: Homework 8 Alvin Lin January 2019 - May 2019 Question 13.1 What is the apparent magnitude of the Sun as seen from Mercury at perihelion? What is the apparent magnitude of the Sun as seen from Eris at perihelion? p 2 dMercury = dmajor 1 − e = 0:378AU = 1:832 × 10−6pc mSun;mercury = MSun;mercury + 5 log(dMercury) − 5 = −28:855 p 2 dEris = dmajor 1 − e = 67:90AU = 0:00029pc mSun;Eris = MSun;Eris + 5 log(dEris) − 5 = −17:85 Question 13.2 Considering absolute magnitude M, apparent magnitude m, and distance d or par- allax π00, compute the unknown for each of these stars: (a) m = −1:6 mag; d = 4:3 pc. What is M? M = m − 5 log(d) + 5 = 0:232 mag (b) M = 14:3 mag; m = 10:9 mag. what is d? m−M+5 d = 10 5 = 2:089 pc 1 (c) m = 5:6 mag; d = 88 pc. What is M? M = m − 5 log(d) + 5 = 0:877 mag (d) M = −0:9 mag; d = 220 pc. What is m? m = M + 5 log(d) − 5 = 5:81 mag (e) m = 0:2 mag;M = −9:0 mag. What is d? m−M+5 d = 10 5 = 691:8 (f) m = 7:4 mag; π00 = 0:004300. What is M? 1 d = = 232:55 pc π00 M = m − 5 log(d) + 5 = 0:567 mag Question 13.3 What are the angular diameters of the following, as seen from the Earth? 5 (a) The Sun, with radius R = R = 7 × 10 km 5 d = 2R = 14 × 10 km d D ≈ tan−1( ) ≈ 0:009◦ = 193000 θ D (b) Betelgeuse, with MV = −5:5 mag; mV = 0:8 mag;R = 650R d = 2R = 1300R m−M+5 15 D = 10 5 = 181:97 pc = 5:62 × 10 km d D ≈ tan−1( ) ≈ 0:03300 θ D (c) The galaxy M31, with R ≈ 30 kpc at a distance D ≈ 0:7 Mpc d D ≈ tan−1( ) = 4:899◦ = 17636:700 θ D (d) The Coma cluster of galaxies, with R ≈ 3 Mpc at a distance D ≈ 100 Mpc d D ≈ tan−1( ) = 3:43◦ = 12361:100 θ D 2 Question 13.4 The Lyten 726-8 star system contains two stars, one with apparent magnitude m = 12:5 and the other with m = 12:9. -
The Spherical Bolometric Albedo of Planet Mercury
The Spherical Bolometric Albedo of Planet Mercury Anthony Mallama 14012 Lancaster Lane Bowie, MD, 20715, USA [email protected] 2017 March 7 1 Abstract Published reflectance data covering several different wavelength intervals has been combined and analyzed in order to determine the spherical bolometric albedo of Mercury. The resulting value of 0.088 +/- 0.003 spans wavelengths from 0 to 4 μm which includes over 99% of the solar flux. This bolometric result is greater than the value determined between 0.43 and 1.01 μm by Domingue et al. (2011, Planet. Space Sci., 59, 1853-1872). The difference is due to higher reflectivity at wavelengths beyond 1.01 μm. The average effective blackbody temperature of Mercury corresponding to the newly determined albedo is 436.3 K. This temperature takes into account the eccentricity of the planet’s orbit (Méndez and Rivera-Valetín. 2017. ApJL, 837, L1). Key words: Mercury, albedo 2 1. Introduction Reflected sunlight is an important aspect of planetary surface studies and it can be quantified in several ways. Mayorga et al. (2016) give a comprehensive set of definitions which are briefly summarized here. The geometric albedo represents sunlight reflected straight back in the direction from which it came. This geometry is referred to as zero phase angle or opposition. The phase curve is the amount of sunlight reflected as a function of the phase angle. The phase angle is defined as the angle between the Sun and the sensor as measured at the planet. The spherical albedo is the ratio of sunlight reflected in all directions to that which is incident on the body. -
Arxiv:2006.10868V2 [Astro-Ph.SR] 9 Apr 2021 Spain and Institut D’Estudis Espacials De Catalunya (IEEC), C/Gran Capit`A2-4, E-08034 2 Serenelli, Weiss, Aerts Et Al
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Weighing stars from birth to death: mass determination methods across the HRD Aldo Serenelli · Achim Weiss · Conny Aerts · George C. Angelou · David Baroch · Nate Bastian · Paul G. Beck · Maria Bergemann · Joachim M. Bestenlehner · Ian Czekala · Nancy Elias-Rosa · Ana Escorza · Vincent Van Eylen · Diane K. Feuillet · Davide Gandolfi · Mark Gieles · L´eoGirardi · Yveline Lebreton · Nicolas Lodieu · Marie Martig · Marcelo M. Miller Bertolami · Joey S.G. Mombarg · Juan Carlos Morales · Andr´esMoya · Benard Nsamba · KreˇsimirPavlovski · May G. Pedersen · Ignasi Ribas · Fabian R.N. Schneider · Victor Silva Aguirre · Keivan G. Stassun · Eline Tolstoy · Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay · Konstanze Zwintz Received: date / Accepted: date A. Serenelli Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Carrer de Can Magrans S/N, Bellaterra, E- 08193, Spain and Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Carrer Gran Capita 2, Barcelona, E-08034, Spain E-mail: [email protected] A. Weiss Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl Schwarzschild Str. 1, Garching bei M¨unchen, D-85741, Germany C. Aerts Institute of Astronomy, Department of Physics & Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, 3001 Leuven, Belgium and Department of Astrophysics, IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, the Netherlands G.C. Angelou Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl Schwarzschild Str. 1, Garching bei M¨unchen, D-85741, Germany D. Baroch J. C. Morales I. Ribas Institute of· Space Sciences· (ICE, CSIC), Carrer de Can Magrans S/N, Bellaterra, E-08193, arXiv:2006.10868v2 [astro-ph.SR] 9 Apr 2021 Spain and Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), C/Gran Capit`a2-4, E-08034 2 Serenelli, Weiss, Aerts et al. -
Observing List
day month year Epoch 2000 local clock time: 2.00 Observing List for 24 7 2019 RA DEC alt az Constellation object mag A mag B Separation description hr min deg min 39 64 Andromeda Gamma Andromedae (*266) 2.3 5.5 9.8 yellow & blue green double star 2 3.9 42 19 51 85 Andromeda Pi Andromedae 4.4 8.6 35.9 bright white & faint blue 0 36.9 33 43 51 66 Andromeda STF 79 (Struve) 6 7 7.8 bluish pair 1 0.1 44 42 36 67 Andromeda 59 Andromedae 6.5 7 16.6 neat pair, both greenish blue 2 10.9 39 2 67 77 Andromeda NGC 7662 (The Blue Snowball) planetary nebula, fairly bright & slightly elongated 23 25.9 42 32.1 53 73 Andromeda M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) large sprial arm galaxy like the Milky Way 0 42.7 41 16 53 74 Andromeda M32 satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 42.7 40 52 53 72 Andromeda M110 (NGC205) satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 40.4 41 41 38 70 Andromeda NGC752 large open cluster of 60 stars 1 57.8 37 41 36 62 Andromeda NGC891 edge on galaxy, needle-like in appearance 2 22.6 42 21 67 81 Andromeda NGC7640 elongated galaxy with mottled halo 23 22.1 40 51 66 60 Andromeda NGC7686 open cluster of 20 stars 23 30.2 49 8 46 155 Aquarius 55 Aquarii, Zeta 4.3 4.5 2.1 close, elegant pair of yellow stars 22 28.8 0 -1 29 147 Aquarius 94 Aquarii 5.3 7.3 12.7 pale rose & emerald 23 19.1 -13 28 21 143 Aquarius 107 Aquarii 5.7 6.7 6.6 yellow-white & bluish-white 23 46 -18 41 36 188 Aquarius M72 globular cluster 20 53.5 -12 32 36 187 Aquarius M73 Y-shaped asterism of 4 stars 20 59 -12 38 33 145 Aquarius NGC7606 Galaxy 23 19.1 -8 29 37 185 Aquarius NGC7009 -
The VVV Templates Project Towards an Automated Classification of VVV
A&A 567, A100 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423904 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics The VVV Templates Project Towards an automated classification of VVV light-curves I. Building a database of stellar variability in the near-infrared R. Angeloni1,2,3, R. Contreras Ramos1,4, M. Catelan1,2,4,I.Dékány4,1,F.Gran1,4, J. Alonso-García1,4,M.Hempel1,4, C. Navarrete1,4,H.Andrews1,6, A. Aparicio7,21,J.C.Beamín1,4,8,C.Berger5, J. Borissova9,4, C. Contreras Peña10, A. Cunial11,12, R. de Grijs13,14, N. Espinoza1,15,4, S. Eyheramendy15,4, C. E. Ferreira Lopes16, M. Fiaschi12, G. Hajdu1,4,J.Han17,K.G.Hełminiak18,19,A.Hempel20,S.L.Hidalgo7,21,Y.Ita22, Y.-B. Jeon23, A. Jordán1,2,4, J. Kwon24,J.T.Lee17, E. L. Martín25,N.Masetti26, N. Matsunaga27,A.P.Milone28,D.Minniti4,20,L.Morelli11,12, F. Murgas7,21, T. Nagayama29,C.Navarro9,4,P.Ochner12,P.Pérez30, K. Pichara5,4, A. Rojas-Arriagada31, J. Roquette32,R.K.Saito33, A. Siviero12, J. Sohn17, H.-I. Sung23,M.Tamura27,24,R.Tata7,L.Tomasella12, B. Townsend1,4, and P. Whitelock34,35 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 29 March 2014 / Accepted 13 May 2014 ABSTRACT Context. The Vista Variables in the Vía Láctea (VVV) ESO Public Survey is a variability survey of the Milky Way bulge and an adjacent section of the disk carried out from 2010 on ESO Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA). The VVV survey will eventually deliver a deep near-IR atlas with photometry and positions in five passbands (ZYJHKS) and a catalogue of 1−10 million variable point sources – mostly unknown – that require classifications. -
Pulsating Variable Stars and the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
- !% ! $1!%" % Studying intrinsically pulsating variable stars plays a very important role in stellar evolution under- standing. The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram is a powerful tool to track which stage of stellar life is represented by a particular type of variable stars. Let's see what major pulsating variable star types are and learn about their place on the H-R diagram. This approach is very useful, as it also allows to make a decision about a variability type of a star for which the properties are known partially. The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram shows a group of stars in different stages of their evolution. It is a plot showing a relationship between luminosity (or abso- lute magnitude) and stars' surface temperature (or spectral type). The bottom scale is ranging from high-temperature blue-white stars (left side of the diagram) to low-temperature red stars (right side). The position of a star on the diagram provides information about its present stage and its mass. Stars that burn hydrogen into helium lie on the diagonal branch, the so-called main sequence. In this article intrinsically pulsating variables are covered, showing their place on the H-R diagram. Pulsating variable stars form a broad and diverse class of objects showing the changes in brightness over a wide range of periods and magnitudes. Pulsations are generally split into two types: radial and non-radial. Radial pulsations mean the entire star expands and shrinks as a whole, while non- radial ones correspond to expanding of one part of a star and shrinking the other. Since the H-R diagram represents the color-luminosity relation, it is fairly easy to identify not only the effective temperature Intrinsic variable types on the Hertzsprung–Russell and absolute magnitude of stars, but the evolutionary diagram. -
GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution
GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution Bo Reipurth Institute for Astronomy Special Publications No. 1 George Herbig in 1960 —————————————————————– GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution —————————————————————– Bo Reipurth Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii at Manoa 640 North Aohoku Place Hilo, HI 96720 USA . Dedicated to Hannelore Herbig c 2016 by Bo Reipurth Version 1.0 – April 19, 2016 Cover Image: The HH 24 complex in the Lynds 1630 cloud in Orion was discov- ered by Herbig and Kuhi in 1963. This near-infrared HST image shows several collimated Herbig-Haro jets emanating from an embedded multiple system of T Tauri stars. Courtesy Space Telescope Science Institute. This book can be referenced as follows: Reipurth, B. 2016, http://ifa.hawaii.edu/SP1 i FOREWORD I first learned about George Herbig’s work when I was a teenager. I grew up in Denmark in the 1950s, a time when Europe was healing the wounds after the ravages of the Second World War. Already at the age of 7 I had fallen in love with astronomy, but information was very hard to come by in those days, so I scraped together what I could, mainly relying on the local library. At some point I was introduced to the magazine Sky and Telescope, and soon invested my pocket money in a subscription. Every month I would sit at our dining room table with a dictionary and work my way through the latest issue. In one issue I read about Herbig-Haro objects, and I was completely mesmerized that these objects could be signposts of the formation of stars, and I dreamt about some day being able to contribute to this field of study. -
Reply to the Comment of T. Metcalfe and J. Van Saders on the Science Report ”The Sun Is Less Active Than Other Solar-Like Stars” by T
Reply to the comment of T. Metcalfe and J. van Saders on the Science report "The Sun is less active than other solar-like stars" by T. Reinhold, A. I. Shapiro, S. K. Solanki, B. T. Montet, N. A. Krivova, R. H. Cameron, E. M. Amazo-G´omez Metcalfe & van Saders (1) show that stars in the periodic sample of (2) have on average smaller effective temperatures and slightly higher metallicities than stars in the non-periodic sample. This implies that the periodic stars have systematically smaller Rossby numbers than the non-periodic stars. (1) interpret this as a confirmation of their hypothesis of the evolutionary transition and decoupling between rotation and magnetic activity that stars experience above a critical Rossby number (3, 4). According to their interpretation, the non-periodic stars and the Sun are either currently in transition to a magnetically inactive future or have already completed it, while the periodic stars did not yet start such a transition. We agree with (1) that both the differences in the fundamental parameters, and the existence of the highly active periodic stars can be explained by the transition hypothesis, which was already indicated as a possible explanation of this phenomenon in (2). At the same time, we want to point out that the alternative explanation, that the Sun and other solar-like stars may occasionally experience epochs of high activity, also allows explaining the available data. In the original study, (2) showed the variability distribution of stars with temperatures between 5500{6000 K and metallicities from -0.8 dex to 0.3 dex. -
Asymptotic Giant Branch
Unit 24 Asymptotic Giant Branch 24.1 General overview • The models representing the AGB for the 1 M⊙ star are approximately 5750-6000. • The models representing the AGB for the 7 M⊙ star are approximately 2260-2495, although the full AGB evolution was not computed. • The H-R tracks are shown in Figure 24.1 • To summarize the approach to the AGB after horizontal branch evolution, the main driver is that helium is less and less available for fusion in the core. • As C and O builds up in the core, the mean molecular weight increases. • The core contracts and increases in temperature (as before, in the Hertzsprung Gap). • The contracting core releases gravitational energy and some gets converted to thermal energy and it reignites He in a shell around the core. • The shell-burning law kicks in and the envelope expands, star moves to the red. • There are 3 main characteristics of the AGB: 1. Nuclear burning takes place in 2 shells (with an He layer in between). As He burning in the core exhausts, a new shell of He burning takes over in addition to the H-burning shell. 2. The luminosity is determined by the core C-O mass only. 3. A strong stellar wind due to radiation pressure develops causing significant mass loss. 4. s-process elements are produced. • Let’s look at some of these. 24.2 Double-shell burning • Some important interior profiles of the 7 M⊙ star on the AGB during double-shell burning are shown in Figure 24.2. • The 2 burning shells are evident from the εnuc.