DOCSLIB.ORG

Penentuan Lex Causae Dalam Kasus Kartika Ratna Thahir Melawan PT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Penentuan Lex Causae Dalam Kasus Kartika Ratna Thahir Melawan PT Kartika Ratna Thahir v PT Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina) Page 1 of 14 SEARCH Case Law Kartika Ratna Thahir v PT Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina) [1994] 3 SLR 257; [1994] SGCA 105 Suit No: CA 204/1992 Decision Date: 25 Aug 1994 Court: Court of Appeal Coram: Karthigesu JA, L P Thean JA, Yong Pung How CJ Counsel: Bernard Eder QC, Michael Hwang and Francis Xavier (Allen & Gledhill) for the appellant, David Hunt QC, Wong Meng Meng and Alvin Yeo (Wong Meng Meng & Pnrs) for the respondents Judgment [Please note that this case has not been edited in accordance with the current Singapore Law Reports house style.] Judgment reserved. LP Thean JA (delivering the judgment of the court): 1 This appeal arises from the decision of Lai Kew Chai J on an originating summons taken out by the Sumitomo Bank Ltd for interpleader reliefs in the face of competing claims to 19 separate and discrete deposits with the Asian Currency Unit (ACU) of the Singapore branch of the bank. Facts 2 The relevant facts that gave rise to the proceedings below have been fully set out in the judgment of the learned judge, reported in [1993] 1 SLR 735. For our purpose, we need only to rehearse them briefly as follows. The respondents (Pertamina), an Indonesian state enterprise, were created on 15 September 1971 by Law No 8 of 1971 of the Republic of Indonesia. They undertook major economic development projects at the direction of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia. One such undertaking was the gigantic development of a huge industrial complex for steel-making and related industries, which encompassed the redevelopment of the existing steel-making plant, in Cilegon, northwest of Java, Indonesia. On 31 August 1970, a company, PT Krakatau Steel (PTKS) was incorporated and its task was to build the infrastructure, comprising the harbour, water and power supply and a railway line to connect the harbour to the steel mill. PTKS was also responsible for the development of the steel plant. However, Pertamina were financially responsible for the infrastructure facilities. In fact, Pertamina virtually took over effective management and control of the construction of the infrastructure facilities in Cilegon as from about June 1973. In many cases, they contracted for the building of the infrastructure facilities. These facilities may be broadly described as follows: (i) a new power generation equipment which was to provide the vast quantity of electricity required for the new electric arc furnaces to produce the steel; (ii) an improved water supply system to provide water for the steel mills; and (iii) a new harbour and a new railway link for the import of raw materials required for the steel-making process and for the http://www.singaporelaw.sg/rss/judg/10401.html 2/24/2011 Kartika Ratna Thahir v PT Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina) Page 2 of 14 export of finished products. It was in relation to these facilities that two German contractors, Siemens AG (Siemens) and Klockner Industrie Analagen GmbH (Klockner), entered into the picture. Siemens contracted to provide the power generation equipment and Klockner and its related companies contracted to build and equip the water supply system. 3 Gen Haji Achmad Thahir (Gen Thahir) was employed by Pertamina and at the material time was the general assistant to the then president director of Pertamina, Gen Ibnu Sutowo (Gen Sutowo). Gen Thahir was appointed to the office with effect from 14 October 1968 and at all material times his total salary was about US$9,000 a year. He held that position until 23 July 1976 when he died. At the date of his death, there stood as having been deposited with the Singapore branch of the Sumitomo Bank Ltd (the bank) 17 separate and discrete ACU deposits denominated in deutschemarks, in the names of “Mr HA Thahir and/or Mrs KR Thahir”, amounting in aggregate to DM53,972,374.12. As at 23 July 1973, the maturity dates of these deposits ranged between a few days and over four months. In addition, there were two other separate and discrete ACU deposits, one time deposit maturing on 18 August 1976 and the other payable on demand, which were denominated in US dollars in the sums of US$593,249.31 and US$608,959.42 respectively; both these deposits were also in their joint names. Mrs KR Thahir is Mrs Kartika Ratna Thahir, the appellant in this appeal (the appellant). 4 The first deposit in the series was made on 25 May 1973, and, thereafter, by the end of May 1974, ten other deposits were made, all of them in the name of Gen Thahir. Subsequently, in early June 1974, Gen Thahir visited the Singapore branch of the bank and opened a joint fixed deposit account in the names of Gen Thahir and the appellant. The account was opened with a sum of DM2,273,478.46 which was deposited on 10 June 1974. By the end of 1975, the Singapore branch of the bank had a total of 19 deposits, all of which, with the exception of one, was in the sole name of Gen Thahir. Sometime in the later part of 1975, Gen Thahir visited the Singapore branch accompanied by the appellant. On this visit, Gen Thahir requested the bank to transfer all the deposits in his sole name to a joint fixed deposit account in the names of Gen Thahir and/or the appellant, and the transfer was effected by the bank on 19 January 1976. As we have related, about six months later, on 23 July 1976, he died. 5 Three days after the death of Gen Thahir, a claim was made at the Jakarta office of the bank by two sons of Gen Thahir by his earlier marriage that all the ACU deposits belonged to the estate of the deceased and the bank was requested to freeze the ACU deposits until such time as the respective interests in the estate had been determined. The Singapore branch of the bank was duly informed of this demand. On 27 July 1976, the appellant personally called at the Singapore branch of the bank and demanded payment of four sums, namely, DM3,287,591.13, DM2,364,187.60, DM2,659,204.26 and US$608,959.42 and further demanded that the balance of the ACU deposits be transferred to her sole name. On the same day, one of the children of Gen Thahir by his earlier marriage, Mr Ibrahim Thahir, called at the Singapore branch of the bank and directed the bank not to pay out any money to the appellant from the ACU deposits until the respective beneficial interests of the appellant and the estate of Gen Thahir were determined. On the following day, Mr Ibrahim Thahir called at the bank again and he was accompanied by Mr Abubakar Thahir and Mr Faruk Thahir, two other sons of Gen Thahir by his earlier marriage. They repeated the earlier demands. 6 Faced with these competing claims, the bank took out the originating summons seeking interpleader reliefs and named the appellant the first defendant and M/s Abubakar Thahir, Ibrahim Thahir and Faruk Thahir collectively as the second defendants. Later, by an order of court made on 4 February 1977, M/s Abubakar Thahir and Ibrahim Thahir were appointed to represent the estate of Gen Thahir for the purpose of those proceedings. About three months later, Pertamina came into the picture; on 6 May 1977, they gave notice to the bank claiming to be entitled to the ACU deposits on the ground that they were wrongfully acquired by Gen Thahir by way of bribes while being employed by Pertamina and the acquisition was contrary to his duty as an employee of Pertamina. In response, the bank applied to the High Court for Pertamina to be joined as a defendant, and by an order made on 24 June 1977, Pertamina was added as a defendant in those proceedings. By a subsequent order made on 12 March 1980, (i) Pertamina was ordered to be the plaintiffs; (ii) the appellant, the first defendant; and (iii) M/s Abubakar Thahir and Ibrahim Thahir representing the estate of the Gen Thahir, the second defendants, on a trial of an issue which we shall state in a moment. 7 On 30 June 1981, it was agreed by all the parties concerned that the two ACU deposits in US dollars would remain in US dollars and the 17 ACU deposits denominated in deutschemarks would be converted into one single US dollar deposit. As at 27 March 1992, the total amount of the ACU deposits, including interest, was US$81,757,260.74. The issue below 8 The parties came to an agreement as to the terms of the issue to be tried, and for the purpose of this appeal, it is only necessary to set out the first issue, as amended by an order of court made on 2 December 1988. We shall call this “the amended first issue”, which is as follows: Whether, as the plaintiffs affirm and the first and second defendants deny, the plaintiffs are entitled to the moneys being the ACU deposits and interest or proceeds in the Sumitomo Bank Ltd [the said moneys] in the names of HA Thahir and/or Kartika Ratna Thahir and whether such entitlement arises either under the http://www.singaporelaw.sg/rss/judg/10401.html 2/24/2011 Kartika Ratna Thahir v PT Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina) Page 3 of 14 law of the Republic of Singapore as the governing law and/or under the law of Indonesia as the law of the place having most connection with the rights, obligations and duties of the persons hereinafter referred to on one or more of the grounds following: (a) belong to the plaintiffs absolutely; (b) are held subject to a trust in favour of the plaintiffs and not otherwise; (c) as being moneys held and received for the plaintiffs’ use; (d) being the proceeds of crime or otherwise obtained unlawfully and/or in breach of contract by the said HA Thahir, should not be disposed of otherwise than to the plaintiffs; (e) that the first defendant, having assisted the said HA Thahir in his dishonest and fraudulent design and/or having participated therein, is in any event liable to the plaintiffs as a constructive trustee thereto.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM
    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
    [Show full text]
  • Smubrochure.Pdf
    SMU LAW SCHOOL The Singapore Government, in a major review of the domestic supply of lawyers, confirmed a shortage of lawyers in Singapore. 2007 hence marked a major milestone in the development of legal education in Singapore – the setting up of the nation’s second law school. SMU is honoured to be entrusted with this important responsibility. As Singapore’s first private university and the only university here with a city campus purpose-built to its pedagogy of small class size and interactive learning, SMU will be extending its unique approach to its School of Law. SMU’s undergraduate law programme aims to mould students into excellent lawyers who will contribute significantly to society. The objective is to produce law graduates who have contextualised legal expertise and the ability to think across disciplines and geographical borders. In terms of pedagogy, SMU’s seminar-style learning will be put to good effect to nurture students who are confident, articulate and analytically agile. CONTENTS 03 Dean’s Message 04 Investing In The Fundamentals // Rigorous and Challenging Curriculum // Holistic Pedagogy & Course Assessment // Optional Second Major // Wide Range of Double Degree Options // Beneficial Internship & Community Service // Internship Partners 09 Commitment To Excellence // Scholarships & Awards // National & International Competitions // International Exchange 12 Career Prospects // Raising The Bar 13 Visionary Campus // City Campus // Facilities 15 Strengthening Our Relevance // Centre for Dispute Resolution // International Islamic Law and Finance Centre // Pro Bono Centre // Asian Peace-building and Rule of Law Programme 18 Heeding The Best // Advisory Board Members 19 Top Notch Faculty // Deanery // Faculty 24 The Fun Stuff // Beyond The Classroom Dean’s Message The School of Law was started in 2007 after a major review of legal education in Singapore concluded that it was timely to have a second law school in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Public Interest Litigation In
    The Role of Public Interest Litigation in Promoting 58 Good Governance in Malaysia and Singapore (2004) XXXIII No 1 THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN PROMOTING GOOD GOVERNANCE IN MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE* ROGER TAN KOR MEE** SUMMARY: In this paper, a two-case study is undertaken on public interest litigation in the promotion of good governance in Malaysia and Singapore. As public interest litigation is a branch of administrative law which involves judicial review of administrative actions, it has a pivotal role to play in an administrative state particularly in the promotion of good governance. Initiated by citizens who may not be directly affected by the administrative acts, such public interest litigants are often frowned upon by the executive as meddlesome busybodies. This makes them a thorn in the executive’s side, and various obstacles were placed in the way by the executive to stymie the growth of public interest litigation. However, it was judicial self-restraint that brought the growth of public interest litigation in Malaysia to a grinding halt. In Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang, the Malaysian Supreme Court took a restrictive approach to the rules of standing. But that does not mean that public-spirited individuals and non-governmental organisations should lose heart. On the contrary, they should persevere and continue to resort to public interest litigation so that it affords an opportunity for the courts to liberalise the current restrictive standing criteria. On the other hand, the absence of public interest litigation in Singapore presupposes that Singapore has a good public administration. Public interest litigation therefore promotes good governance in public administration.
    [Show full text]
  • SAL Annual Report 2001
    SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL REPORT Financial year 2001/2002 MISSION STATEMENT Building up the intellectual capital, capability and infrastructure of members of the Singapore Academy of Law. Promotion of esprit de corps among members of the Singapore Academy of Law. SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL REPORT 1 April 2001 - 31 march 2002 5Foreword 7Introduction 13 Annual Report 2001/2002 43 Highlights of the Year 47 Annual Accounts 2001/2002 55 Thanking the Fraternity Located in City Hall, the Singapore Academy of Law is a body which brings together the legal profession in Singapore. FOReWoRD SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW FOREWORD by Chief Justice Yong Pung How President, Singapore Academy of Law From a membership body in 1988 with a staff strength of less than ten, the Singapore Academy of Law has grown to become an internationally-recognised organisation serving many functions and having two subsidiary companies – the Singapore Mediation Centre and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The year 2001/2002 was a fruitful one for the Academy and its subsidiaries. The year kicked off with an immersion programme in Information Technology Law for our members. The inaugural issue of the Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review of Singapore Cases 2000 was published, followed soon after by the publication of a book, “Developments in Singapore Law between 1996 and 2000”. The Singapore International Arbitration Centre launched its Domestic Arbitration Rules in May 2001, and together with the Singapore Mediation Centre, launched the Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for resolving “.sg” domain name disputes. The Academy created a Legal Development Fund of $5 million to be spread over 5 years for the development of the profession in new areas of law and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing from Strength to Strength: Setting a Higher Bar
    Growing From Strength to Strength: Setting a Higher Bar. SCHOOL OF LAW Pearlynn Wang Bachelor of Laws and Bachelor of Business Management 2013 Intake Khairul Ashraf bin Khairul Anwar Bachelor of Laws 2013 Intake SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY DEAN’S ADDRESS The academic year 2017-18 will be doubly momentous for the SMU School of Law. First, it will be 10 years since the establishment of the School in 2007. Secondly, in January 2017, the School moved to its new home at 55 Armenian Street, adjacent to the equally new, and iconic, Kwa Geok Choo Law Library. Situated in the city centre next to the lush greenery of Fort Canning Park, the School of Law is at the same time only a short distance away from the central business district and the civic district including the courts of law and Parliament House. In tandem with the University’s philosophy of broad-based curriculum and emphasis on holistic education, the School of Law offers a unique proposition for learning of the law in context. We aim to train graduates who are not only able to solve legal problems, but who are also capable of thinking across disciplines and borders. We invite leading industry experts to engage with our students on a regular basis. Internship and pro bono legal activities form part of the education. There are opportunities to enrol in double-degree programmes as well as to read majors from other schools. We have many overseas exchange partners and there will be other global exposure opportunities. Students will find themselves immersed in a lively and exciting atmosphere, both inside and outside the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Gyh Ls 2.Pdf
    Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ We acknowledge, with thanks, the permission of the author, editor and publisher to reproduce this article on the Singapore Judicial College microsite. Not to be circulated or reproduced without the prior permission of the author, editor and publisher. Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. 176 Singapore Academy of Law Journal (2011) 23 SAcLJ AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGAPORE LAW This article presents the preliminary findings and views of a comprehensive empirical study of Singapore law from 1965 to 2008. A significant component of this study involves a detailed empirical study into the development of Singapore law by reference to a number of objective indicia. From the empirical data collected, the study then briefly analyses the data gathered in a qualitative fashion. Here, the study draws conclusions as to how far we have come in the development of Singapore law in a wide range of important spheres, including civil, commercial, criminal, tort and constitutional law; how and why Singapore law has been shaped by foreign decisions; the trends and extrapolations that could be made in terms of the practice of judicial decision-making; and what some of the factors might be that account for these developments. GOH Yihan* LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (Harvard); Assistant Professor, National University of Singapore. Paul TAN* LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore); Senior Associate, Rajah & Tann LLP.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd V Pacific Century Regional
    Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd v Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited [2000] SGHC 189 Case Number : Suit 1091/1999 Decision Date : 18 September 2000 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : Lai Kew Chai J Counsel Name(s) : Davinder Singh SC, Hri Kumar and Siraj Omar (Drew & Napier) for the plaintiffs; K Shanmugam SC, Edwin Tong and Prakash Pillai (Allen & Gledhill) for the defendants Parties : Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd — Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited Contract – Contractual terms – Factual matrix – Whether evidence of factual matrix and mutual understanding of parties admissible in interpreting written contract Contract – Contractual terms – Breach – Time of assessment of damages – Whether damages to be assessed at time of breach or date of judgment : This is a trial of a claim for massive damages for an alleged breach of a `tag along` clause in a joint venture agreement. Background The plaintiffs claim substantial damages against the defendants for breach of a shareholders` agreement (`the agreement`) made between them on 31 January 1997. By the agreement the plaintiffs entered into a joint venture agreement with the defendants. Under it, a joint venture company called Quinliven Pte Ltd (`Quinliven`) was incorporated with the purpose of participating in the development of a massive underground car-park in Shanghai, People`s Republic of China. The plaintiffs owned 25% of the shares in Quinliven. As for the defendants, until 3 August 1999, they owned the remaining 75%. The directors of Quinliven included directors from the plaintiffs and the defendants. Clause 11(E) of the agreement is hotly contested. It provides: 11 Transfer of shares ..
    [Show full text]
  • “Pragmatism and Realism Do Not Mean Abdication”1: a Critical and Empirical Inquiry Into Singapore’S Engagement with International Human Rights Law
    (2004) 8 SYBIL 41–91 © 2004 Singapore Year Book of International Law and Contributors “PRAGMATISM AND REALISM DO NOT MEAN ABDICATION”1: A CRITICAL AND EMPIRICAL INQUIRY INTO SINGAPORE’S ENGAGEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ∗ by THIO LI-ANN Singapore acceded to three United Nations (UN) human rights treaties in 1995 on women’s rights, children’s rights and the genocide convention. It recently commenced engaging with the treaty-monitoring bodies through state reports. Drawing upon state practice, this article examines Singapore’s human rights practice and its “pragmatic realist” approach, this being an instructive case study in demonstrating how “rights” play out within a “communitarian” society which valorises collective interests and favours consensus and a “responsibilities” dis- course over adversarial rights language. It addresses themes central to understanding Singapore human rights practice in terms of substantive content, dominant rights theory, interpreta- tive and enforcement approaches, including interactions with UN human rights institutions and non-government bodies. It contends that human rights policy is ultimately informed by state objectives prioritising economic growth, development and social order, often justified by reference to culturally relativistic “Asian values”. I. INTRODUCTION The international law on human rights is not a value-neutral ideology; historically, it is rooted in revolt against the barbarism human governments are universally capable of.2 Human rights law is committed to the vulnerable individual’s welfare, recognising, as pru- dential necessity dictates, that the state can both protect and abuse its people. It seeks, through international standards and external modes of accountability, to promote and protect human dignity, through the legal technique of “rights” or justiciable entitlements asserted against the modern state.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law 1
    Administrative and Constitutional Law 1 1. ADMINISTRATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW THIO LI-ANN BA (Hons) (Oxford), LLM (Harvard), PhD (Cambridge); Barrister (Gray’s Inn) Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore Introduction 1.1 With respect to developments in the field of administrative law in 2003, there was case law which further elaborated when the non-exhaustion of domestic remedies might bar an application for judicial review. The jurisdictional reach of judicial review to non-statutory or private unincorporated associations was also affirmed. Allegations of procedural unfairness were made in an expulsion case and with respect to the conduct of judicial proceedings. More unusually, a decision to terminate the employment of a member of the police force was successfully challenged on the substantive ground of irrationality. 1.2 The main constitutional cases related to the constitutional delimitation of government powers – specifically, the scope of sentencing power and whether this could be cabined by the terms of an extradition order; also, whether ordering the suspension of a sentence was a facet of executive or judicial power. The fundamental liberty of free speech in Part IV of the Constitution was implicated in a challenge against the constitutionality of the Public Entertainments and Meetings Act. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Judicial review Scope of judicial review 1.3 The formal conceptual justification for judicial review is that this gives effect to the intention of Parliament as embodied in statute, with courts in supervisory capacity policing the decision-making processes of public bodies to ensure that they remain within the derived limits of their power.
    [Show full text]
  • 786KB***An Empirical Study on the Development of Singapore
    176 Singapore Academy of Law Journal (2011) 23 SAcLJ AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGAPORE LAW This article presents the preliminary findings and views of a comprehensive empirical study of Singapore law from 1965 to 2008. A significant component of this study involves a detailed empirical study into the development of Singapore law by reference to a number of objective indicia. From the empirical data collected, the study then briefly analyses the data gathered in a qualitative fashion. Here, the study draws conclusions as to how far we have come in the development of Singapore law in a wide range of important spheres, including civil, commercial, criminal, tort and constitutional law; how and why Singapore law has been shaped by foreign decisions; the trends and extrapolations that could be made in terms of the practice of judicial decision-making; and what some of the factors might be that account for these developments. GOH Yihan* LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (Harvard); Assistant Professor, National University of Singapore. Paul TAN* LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore); Senior Associate, Rajah & Tann LLP. I. Introduction 1 Not unsurprisingly, the development of Singapore’s laws mirrors the historical arc of our nation-building efforts.1 Just as * The authors are extremely grateful for the support and inspiration of the Honourable the Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong, whose issuance of Practice Direction 1/2008 (discussed below) (among other things) will no doubt be judged by history most favourably. But this project and article would not have taken off the ground without the profound insights and encouragement of the Honourable Judges of Appeal Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong and Justice V K Rajah, to whom we first turned when the project was conceived.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing a Persuasive Appellate Brief
    (2007) 19 SAcLJ Appellate Briefs 337 WRITING A PERSUASIVE APPELLATE BRIEF Writing an appellate brief is a momentous task – this may be the last chance to convince a court of law of your client’s case, or you are defending a favourable verdict in the court below after months, if not years, of hard work. Yet, it is not often appreciated just how specialised appellate advocacy is. This article focuses on the written dimension of appellate advocacy and attempts to articulate significant but frequently overlooked aspects unique to writing a persuasive appellate brief. Paul TAN∗ LLB (Hons), National University of Singapore I. Introduction 1 A by-product of the dramatisation of courtroom litigation in the media is that many believe that legal battles are won and lost in the courtroom. While this may be true to an extent, the influence of written advocacy on judicial decision-making should not to be underestimated. There are at least three reasons to believe that particularly in appeals it is the written submission that exercises a disproportionate effect on the outcome. First, appellate judges here usually read the written submissions before oral argument. A weak or unpersuasive brief creates doubts about one’s case. A strong brief, on the other hand, may have the effect of pre- empting the concerns of the judges, making one’s job at the hearing easier.1 Second, time allocated to parties to present their oral arguments ∗ In writing this article, I received tremendous encouragement and insight from the Judges of the Supreme Court of Singapore; and in particular, The Honourable the Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong, Judges of Appeal Andrew Phang Boon Leong and V K Rajah, the Honourable Justice Choo Han Teck as well as former Judicial Commissioner Sundaresh Menon.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening of the Legal Year 2006 Ceremony Marked “Another Step in Our Annual Pilgrimage to the Altar of Justice”
    MICA (P) No. 064/05/2005 January — February 2006 interSINGAPOREinterSINGAPORE ACADEMYACADEMY seseOFOF LAWLAW OpeningOpening ofof thethe LegalLegal YearYear 20062006 HighlightsHighlights ofof thethe SALSAL ConferenceConference 20062006 SingaporeLaw and its Future Overseas INTER ALIA The official opening of the new Supreme Court building by His Excellency President S R Nathan was a significant step for all involved in the justice system. It showed how far the legal institution has come over the last 15 years. The Honourable Attorney-General Chan Sek Keong remarked in his speech that the Opening of the Legal Year 2006 ceremony marked “another step in our annual pilgrimage to the altar of justice”. At the beginning of each year, the legal community comes together to continue the quest for impartiality, professionalism and efficiency in the dispensation of justice. The opening of the legal year ceremony is for all involved to renew their vows to ensuring access to justice, facilitating communication of justice and, sustaining and developing trust in the justice system as identified by the President of the Law Society of Singapore, Mr Philip Jeyaretnam SC, in his speech this year. The Honourable the Chief Justice Yong Pung How’s response brought to the fore the reality of continuous hard work required to ensure a quality dispensation of justice. The Chief Justice spoke on the many positive developments, over the last 15 years, in the way justice is administered in Singapore. These included the clearing of the backlog of cases in the Supreme Court, jurisdictional reform to ensure more fluid and efficient case management in the court system, rationalising of court procedures and processes in both higher and lower courts, and the building up of a strong Bench for quality of justice in the hearing of such cases.
    [Show full text]