Institutional Violence in Ontario Corrections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Institutional Violence in Ontario Corrections Institutional Violence in Ontario Final Report Case Study: Toronto South Detention Centre Independent Review of Ontario Corrections December 2018 Institutional Violence in Ontario Final Report Case Study: Toronto South Detention Centre Independent Review of Ontario Corrections December 2018 Independent Review of Ontario Corrections Team Core Members Howard Sapers — Independent Advisor Andrea Monteiro — Review Team Manager Yoko Murphy — Corrections Advisor Jean-Philippe Crete — Corrections Advisor Mitchell Croteau Walker — Corrections Advisor Kim St-Cyr — Administrative Assistant ISBN: 978-1-4868-2963-7 (Print) © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, December 2018 Table of Contents PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 3 I. MANDATE AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 10 II. CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 15 Findings from the Interim Report ......................................................................................... 16 III. KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................ 21 1. Data Collection and Information Reporting ................................................................... 21 Reported Incidents ................................................................................................................ 21 Reporting Process .................................................................................................................. 22 Information Sharing ............................................................................................................... 27 Data Collection and Information Reporting Recommendations: ............................................. 28 2. Institutional Culture and Staffing .................................................................................. 30 Correctional Work Environment ........................................................................................... 30 Relationships with Managers ................................................................................................ 37 Perspectives and Attitudes Toward Correctional Work ........................................................ 38 Training and Hiring Correctional Staff ................................................................................... 46 Institutional Culture and Staffing Recommendations: ............................................................. 52 3. Operational Practices.................................................................................................... 55 Control Mechanisms .............................................................................................................. 56 Inmate Intake Assessment and Classification ....................................................................... 58 Multi-level Housing Units ...................................................................................................... 63 Programming ......................................................................................................................... 68 Operational Practices Recommendations: ................................................................................ 77 IV. CONSOLIDATED RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 81 V. IMPLEMENTING CHANGE ............................................................................................................. 89 APPENDIX A. CASE STUDY: TORONTO SOUTH DETENTION CENTRE .............................. A-1 A-I. Context and Background .............................................................................................. A-4 Institutional History .................................................................................................................. A-5 Inmate Demographics .............................................................................................................. A-8 Inmate Supervision Model ..................................................................................................... A-10 Staffing Numbers .................................................................................................................... A-16 Population Ratios ................................................................................................................... A-18 Institutional Budget ................................................................................................................ A-19 A-II. Inmate-on-Staff Incidents: 2017 In-Depth Analysis ..................................................... A-22 Reported Incidents of Inmate-on-Staff Violence ................................................................... A-24 Inmates Involved in Incidents ................................................................................................ A-28 Correctional Employees Involved in Incidents ....................................................................... A-33 A-III. Incident Reporting Practices ..................................................................................... A-35 Inmate-on-Staff Incidents ...................................................................................................... A-35 Misconducts ........................................................................................................................... A-37 A-IV. Institutional Culture ................................................................................................. A-41 Employee Safety Concerns ..................................................................................................... A-41 Staff-Management Relationships ........................................................................................... A-43 Punitive Views ........................................................................................................................ A-46 Staff-Inmate Relationships ..................................................................................................... A-47 A-V. Staff Training and Mentorship Opportunities ............................................................ A-49 A-VI. Operational Practices ............................................................................................... A-56 Inmate Classification .............................................................................................................. A-56 Multi-level Housing Units ....................................................................................................... A-58 Special Needs Unit .............................................................................................................. A-59 Mental Health Assessment Unit ......................................................................................... A-59 Behavioural Management Unit and Special Handling Unit ................................................ A-60 Operationalizing TSDC’s Housing Units .............................................................................. A-63 Inmate Programming ............................................................................................................. A-69 A-VII. Toronto South Detention Centre: Opportunities for Change .................................... A-74 APPENDIX B. IROC INSTITUTIONAL VIOLENCE SURVEY RESULTS ................................... B-1 Supplementary Tables – Final Report ...................................................................................... B-1 Supplementary Tables – Appendix A. Case Study: Toronto South Detention Centre ............. B-5 Table of Figures Figure 1. Reported Inmate-on-Staff Incidents of Violence, 2012-2017 ....................................... 16 Figure 2. Reported Inmate-on-Staff Incidents by Type, 2017 at TSDC and Rest of Provincial Institutions ................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 3. MCSCS Incident Reporting Paperwork Process ............................................................. 22 Figure 4. MCSCS New Hires in Select Ontario Correctional Facilities, 2014-2017 ....................... 48 Figure 5. Age, Holding Type, and Most Serious Offence for Inmates at TSDC in 2017 ................ 56 Figure 6. Inmate Recreation Areas, OCI ........................................................................................ 69 Figure 7. Communal Living and Dining Areas, OCI ........................................................................ 69 Figure 8. Inmate Program Areas, CNCC ........................................................................................ 70 Figure 9. Resident Room, SLVCTC ................................................................................................. 71 Table of Tables Table 1. Number of IROC Institutional Violence Survey Respondents by Institution .................. 13 Table 2. IROC Institutional Violence Survey – Responses from Correctional Officers and Sergeants (including Staff Sergeants) .......................................................................................... 39 Table of Textboxes
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Vision and Current Operation of the Toronto South Detention Centre
    Promises Broken or Promises Kept? An Analysis of the Vision and Current Operation of the Toronto South Detention Centre by Braiden Bhindi A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Legal Studies Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario 2019 Braiden Bhindi Abstract This study explores the justifications and realities of carceral expansion. It compares the vision for the Toronto South Detention Centre to its implementation once it opened in 2014. For this research, a thematic qualitative analysis was undertaken through collected news media and secondary sources. I conclude that the justifications used to legitimate the Toronto South Detention Centre run contrary to what has taken place at the facility as illustrated through several challenges and shortfalls. As such, this research adopts a prison abolitionist lens to contend for the adoption of alternatives to incarceration, as opposed to constructing larger carceral institutions due to the reality of jail expansion at the Toronto South Detention Centre. The project also adopts a public criminology lens to examine how the results of the study can be shared with a wider public audience outside of academia, in an attempt to influence public policy. ii Acknowledgements Many individuals contributed to the success of this project. First and foremost, thank you to my supervisor, Aaron Doyle, and committee members, Dale Spencer and Justin Piché, for your advice, support, and encouragement over the course of conducting this study. I would also like to thank the Ontario Graduate Scholarship program and the Department of Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University for their generous funding and support over the course of my degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Globe and Mail Subject Photography
    Finding Aid for Series F 4695-1 The Globe and Mail subject photography The following list was generated by the Globe & Mail as an inventory to the subject photography library and may not be an accurate reflection of the holdings transferred to the Archives of Ontario. This finding aid will be replaced by an online listing once processing is complete. How to view these records: Consult the listing and order files by reference code F 4695-1. A&A MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT INC. music stores A.C. CROSBIE SHIP AARBURG (Switzerland) AARDVARK animal ABACO ABACUS adding machine ABBA rock group ABBEY TAVERN SINGERS ABC group ABC TELEVISION NETWORK ABEGWAIT ferry ABELL WACO ABERDEEN city (Scotland) ABERFOYLE MARKET ABIDJAN city (Ivory Coast) ABITIBI PAPER COMPANY ABITIBI-PRICE INC. ABKHAZIA republic ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN Himalayan myth ABORIGINAL JUSTICE INQUIRY ABORIGINAL RIGHTS ABORIGINES ABORTION see also: large picture file ABRAHAM & STRAUS department store (Manhattan) ABU DHABI ABU SIMBEL (United Arab Republic) ACADEMIE BASEBALL CANADA ACADEMY AWARDS ACADEMY OF CANADIAN CINEMA & TELEVISION ACADEMY OF COUNTRY MUSIC AWARDS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE (Toronto) see: TORONTO ACADEMY OF MEDICINE 1 ACADIA steamship ACADIA AXEMEN FOOTBALL TEAM ACADIA FISHERIES LTD. (Nova Scotia) ACADIA steamship ACADIA UNIVERSITY (Nova Scotia) ACADIAN LINES LTD. ACADIAN SEAPLANTS LIMITED ACADIAN TRAIL ACAPULCO city (Mexico) ACCESS NETWORK ACCIDENTS - Air (Up to 1963) - Air (1964-1978) - Air (1979-1988) - Air (1988) - Lockerbie Air Disaster - Air (1989-1998) see also: large picture file - Gas fumes - Level crossings - Marine - Mine - Miscellaneous (up to 1959) (1959-1965) (1966-1988) (1989-1998) see also: large picture file - Railway (up to 1962) (1963-1984) (1985-1998) see also: large picture file - Street car - Traffic (1952-1979) (1980-1989) (1990-1998) see also: large picture file ACCORDIAN ACCUTANE drug AC/DC group ACHILLE LAURO ship ACID RAIN ACME LATHING AND DRYWALL LIMITED ACME SCREW AND GEAR LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Punishment 1
    Capital Punishment 1 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ASHLEY DZAMA 1. Introduction: An Issue in the Forefront of Society Martin Luther King Jr. once said, civilization and violence are antithetical concepts. Through violence you may murder a murderer, but you can’t murder, murder. Through violence you may murder a liar, but you can’t establish truth. Through violence you may murder a hater, but you can’t murder hate. Darkness cannot put out darkness, only light can do that.1 A controversial practice from its very beginning, capital punishment or the death penalty, is a topic that has never been put to rest. Debates over the justness and effectiveness of the death penalty are as old as the practice itself, and arguments for and against the practice have never really changed.2 It is common for these arguments to continue in countries where the death penalty is still a practiced punishment. For Canada, a country where the practice has been abolished for thirty-three years, the topic is as controversial as if the death penalty never left the penal code. On December 11, 1962, Canada’s last executions took place shortly after midnight.3 Facing a death by hanging were Arthur Lucas, 54, who was convicted of murdering an FBI informant working in Canada, and Ronald Turpin, 29, who was convicted of shooting a 1 Martin Luther King Jr., “Random Quotes on Capital Punishment,” Death Penalty News, http://deathpenaltynews.blogspot.com (accessed February 22, 2009). 2 Isaac Ehrlich, “The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death,” The American Economic Review 65 (1975): 397.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Don Jail
    A History of this Site Site Timeline Since its earliest days, the facilities on this site have Site Buildings 1793 – 243 acres are granted by Toronto’s founder, 1957 – The Riverdale Isolation Hospital addressed the most pressing public issues of the time. 1 Bridgepoint Hospital (2013) Governor General Simcoe, to his estate is renamed Riverdale Hospital In the 1860s, planning and construction began for a 2 Old Don Jail (1864) manager, John Scadding 1958 – The new East Wing of Metropolitan new, progressive Jail and a House of Refuge. The House Bridgepoint Administration Building (2013) 1856 – 120 acres is sold by Scadding’s family Toronto Jail is constructed was constructed to shelter Toronto’s “poor, needy, and 3 Governor’s House (1888) to the City of Toronto 1963 – The new Riverdale Hospital opens disabled” but was converted to serve as an isolation Emily’s House, Philip Aziz Centre (2013) 1860 – The House of Refuge is constructed for 1964 – The Don Valley Parkway opens hospital when a smallpox epidemic began in the 1870s. 4 Gate House (1865) Toronto’s “poor, needy, and disabled” 1977 – The Old Don Jail closes Over the years the hospital grew, and in recent years Philip Aziz Centre Administration (2013) 1864 – The Old Don Jail is constructed as 2002 – Riverdale Hospital is renamed has evolved into Bridgepoint Active Healthcare, Canada’s 5 Riverdale Public Library (1910) a more humane and orderly new alternative Bridgepoint Hospital leader in understanding, treating, and managing complex to Toronto’s previous three jails 2013 – The new Bridgepoint Hospital chronic illness. Information Panels 1865 – A Gate House is constructed for the and Emily’s House open Information panels throughout the Bridgepoint campus gatekeeper of the Old Don Jaill tell the fascinating stories associated with the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Movement Lessons from the US Anti- Death Penalty Movement
    1 Social Movement Lessons from the US Anti- Death Penalty Movement Jamie Harris Researcher May 22, 2020 © 2020 Sentience Institute Edited by Jacy Reese Anthis and Kelly McNamara. Many thanks to the researchers who provided feedback or checked the citations of their work, including Amber E. Boydstun, Robert M. Bohm, Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier, Wayne Sandholtz, Frank R. Baumgartner, Sangmin Bae, and Andrew Hammel. Thanks also to Tom Beggs for discussion on case study methodology. Abstract This report aims to assess (1) the extent to which the anti-death penalty movement in the United States, especially from 1966-2015, can be said to have successfully achieved its goals, (2) what factors caused the various successes and failures of this movement, and (3) what these findings suggest about how modern social movements should strategize. The analysis highlights the farmed animal movement as an illustrative example of the strategic implications for a variety of movements. Key findings of this report include that a narrow focus on legal strategies can discourage the growth of a grassroots movement that may be more effective in the longer term and that legislative change is possible without public support. Social Movement Lessons From the US Anti-Death Penalty Movement Jamie Harris | Sentience Institute |May 22, 2020 2 Table of Contents Abstract 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 4 Summary of Key Implications 6 A Condensed Chronological History of the US Anti-Death Penalty Movement 7 Early History of the ADPM 7 1872-1936: Sporadic, temporary legislative success 12 1936-1966: Declining execution rates 16 1966-72: Litigation and temporary legal success through Furman v.
    [Show full text]