360 QUARTERLY

State and County Profiles 1st Quarter SFY 2017

New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department Protective Services Division

About the 360 Report PS Director’s Office The 360 Report is published quarterly to provide CYFD management, Francine Anaya, Director staff, external partners and stakeholders with data related to: Vacant, Field Deputy Director Annamarie Luna, Program Deputy Director  Reports of child abuse and neglect; Valerie Sandoval, Administrative Deputy Director  Investigations of child abuse and neglect; (505) 827-8400 www.cyfd.org  Substantiated child abuse and neglect;

 Permanency plans for children in custody;  Number of children and youth in foster care; About the Regional Offices CYFD is divided into five regions, each one with its own central staff. And other measures of child safety, permanency, and well being. The Regional Offices are responsible for ensuring that the counties they oversee are supported effectively. Data in this report can be used to inform New Mexicans of trends in a particular area and where support may be needed. Data can also indi- cate positive outcomes in an aspect of the system in a particular Regional Managers county or region. The 360 Report is a tool that can bring science to NW Region 1 inform the prevention and treatment process. Sarah Blackwell (505) 865-8634

NE Region 2 About the Data Joy Weathers (505) 425-9335 Data for the County Profiles are prepared through the collaborative efforts of the Data Evaluation Unit and FACTS Unit within CYFD’s Re- Metro Region 3 search, Assessment and Data Bureau, and Information Technology Delphine Trujillo (505) 841-7887 Services. Additional assistance and guidance is provided by the US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Chil- SE Region 4 dren and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Virginia Villarreal (575) 624-6071 Children’s Bureau. SW Region 5 Cecilia Rosales (575) 373-6410 About Protective Services Protective Services strives to enhance the safety, permanency, and well being of children and families in New Mexico. Reaching CYFD PS Staff Protective Services workers investigate reports of child maltreat- To contact state or local CYFD staff, please refer to the following link: ment and intervene to keep New Mexico’s children safe. We provide http://cyfd.org/contact-us foster care to approximately 2,500 children each day and work with families to enable parents to safely care for their children. When that cannot be accomplished, Protective Services finds safe, permanent Research, Assessment and Data families for children through adoption or permanent guardianship. (RAD) Bureau—Data Evaluation Unit Protective Services also works with youth emancipating from the Sarah Meadows, LMSW, Data Evaluation Unit Manager foster care system to help them successfully transition into adult- (505) 257-8752 hood. John Barela, Data Evaluation Specialist

San Juan Rio Arriba Taos Colfax Union

R-2

Mora Harding Sandoval

Santa Fe San Miguel Quay McKinley Los Alamos R-1

Bernalillo R-3 Guadalupe West East Torrance Cibola Curry

Valencia DeBaca

Socorro Lincoln Roosevelt Catron

Lea

Grant Sierra R-4 Chaves

Hidalgo Otero Eddy Luna R-5 R-5

Dona Ana Note: Map is a graphical representation and does not show precise county boundaries.

CONTENTS

STATEWIDE DATA……….4

REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 Cibola……………………….10 Colfax/Union.…………...40 Bernalillo (Metro).……....65 Chaves………..……..………...74 Catron/Grant……..……...104 McKinley…………………..15 Guadalupe/Mora/ Bernalillo East …………….70 Curry………….. ...…………….79 Dona Ana……. ...…………...109 San Juan…...…………...20 San Miguel………………...45 Bernalillo West…………....72 De Baca/Harding/ Hidalgo/Luna...... ………....114 Sandoval ……...... 25 Los Alamos/ Quay……………....…………...84 Lincoln………………………....119 Torrance……...... 30 Rio Arriba.….…...... 50 Eddy……………………………..89 Otero………………..………...124 Valencia….……………...35 Santa Fe.…………………..55 Lea………………...…………….94 Sierra……………………..….129 Taos………………………….60 Roosevelt……………………199 Socorro……………………...134

New Mexico White: 67.2% MISSION: IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR OUR CHILDREN Black/African American: 2.2% All of New Mexico’s children are our priority. We work to make sure that every child American Indian/Alaska Native: 11.1% is safe from abuse and neglect. We also work to strengthen families so that they are Asian: 1.1% safe, healthy, and resilient. Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander: 0.1% For every child involved with Protective Services, we track his or her progress Some other race: 12.8% through our FACTS data system. This report focuses on families involved with PS, and children in foster care. Two or more races: 5.5% The data in this section provide an overview of all children and families in New Mexico. Hispanic or Latino origin (any race): 58.6% Children in New Mexico: 511,806* White, not Hispanic or Latino: 26.0%

 Under 6 years: 33.2% Children with a Disability: 3.7%  Age 6-11 years: 34.2%

 Age 12-17 years: 32.6% Children aged 3-17: 83.7%   Enrolled in school: 88.5% Median household income, 2007-2011: $43,872  Private school: 9.4% Children under 18 living in poverty: 30%  Public school: 90.6% Born in United States: 96.8% Foreign-born: 3.2% *US Census 2009-2013 American Community Survey

New Mexico: Intakes & Investigations

A1 New Mexico Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B1 New Mexico Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation that Intake) received in New Mexico for the last 8 quarters. They include reports were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some inves- that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). Source: tigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 4 New Mexico SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

New Mexico: Investigations & Allegations

C1 New Mexico Investigation Outcomes D1 New Mexico Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter New Mexico 1,284 Substantiated 30.7% 2,893 Unsubstantiated 69.3% Child Victims 2,261 Victim Rate per 1,000 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in New Mexico, as well as the This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in New statewide rate of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Mexico during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E1 New Mexico Investigation Dispositions F1 New Mexico Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the This is a strategic planning measure. The national standard for this measure investigation. Source: sm06a01c is 5.4%. Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 5 New Mexico SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

New Mexico: Children in Care

G1 New Mexico Foster Care Entries & Exits H1 New Mexico Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in New Mexico. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the state population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in New Mexico for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I1 New Mexico Age Ranges of Children in Care J1 New Mexico Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Region 1 65 158 112 97 75 507 Region 2 47 84 75 54 33 293 Region 3 160 334 237 216 150 1097 Region 4 66 107 90 59 72 394 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 New Mexico 393 788 615 491 376 2663 Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in New Mexico as of the end of the quarter. The data are presented by region as well as statewide. This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care Source: AFCARS in New Mexico, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 6 New Mexico SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

New Mexico: Outcomes for Children in Care

K1 New Mexico “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L1 New Mexico Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in New This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in New Mexico Mexico who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. Source: during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M1 New Mexico Children Adopted within 24 Months N1 New Mexico Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 months 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome in New Mexico who have experienced no more than 2 placements since en- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort tering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 7 New Mexico SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

New Mexico: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O1 New Mexico Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P1 New Mexico Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in New Mexico for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quar- during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS ter. Source: pm02a01

Q1 New Mexico Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R1 New Mexico Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and permanency planning workers in New Mexico for the last eight quarters. This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time referral for the quarter. Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human licensed providers. Source: pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 8 New Mexico SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

New Mexico: Legal Cases & Outcomes

S1 New Mexico Abuse/Neglect Petitions Filed Last 18 Months T1 New Mexico Average Months from Adjudication to First Completed Permanency Hearing

This chart shows the number of Abuse & Neglect petitions filed in the last 18 This chart displays the average number of months, by region, between months, broken down by region and displayed as the percentage of total adjudication of a legal case and the child(ren)’s first permanency hearing. petitions filed by each region. Source: sm0927 Source: sm0927

U1 New Mexico Children who Reunify within 12 Months V1 New Mexico Children who Re-Enter Care within 12 Months

This chart shows the percentage of children exiting care to reunify with their This chart shows the percentage of children who, after being discharged to families of origin, who do so within the target 12-month period. This is a stra- reunification from an earlier episode of care, re-enter care within 12 months tegic planning measure that uses an entry cohort based on the federal fiscal of discharge. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an entry cohort year. Source: AFCARS based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 9 New Mexico SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Cibola County Bluewater, Fence Lake, Grants, Laguna, Mesita, Milan, Paguate, Paraje, Seama

Population estimate under age 20: 7,583 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 1.3% Median household income, 2007-2011: $36,974 Children under 18 living in poverty: 43% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.3%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Rebecca Sandoval CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 285-6673 Regional Manager: Sarah Blackwell Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Cibola County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A2 Cibola Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B2 Cibola Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation that Intake) received in Cibola County for the last 8 quarters. They include re- were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some inves- ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). tigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 10 Cibola County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Cibola County: Investigations & Allegations

C2 Cibola Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D2 Cibola Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Cibola Region State 20 253 1,284 Substantiated 42.6% 32.4% 30.7% 27 528 2,893 Unsubstantiated 57.4% 67.6% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 1.1% 18.7% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 35 453 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 4.6 3.2 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Cibola County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northwest) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Cibola as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E2 Cibola Investigation Dispositions F2 Cibola Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strategic investigation. Source: sm06a01c planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. Source:

360 County Profiles 11 Cibola County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Cibola County: Children in Care

G2 Cibola Foster Care Entries & Exits H2 Cibola Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Cibola County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point- Cibola County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I2 Cibola Age Ranges of Children in Care J2 Cibola Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Cibola 7 17 6 2 3 35 Region 1 65 158 112 97 75 507 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 10.8% 10.8% 5.4% 2.1% 4.0% 6.9% County % of State Total 1.8% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 0.8% 1.3% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Cibola County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster region and statewide. Source: AFCARS care in Cibola County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 12 Cibola County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Cibola County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K2 Cibola “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L2 Cibola Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Cibola County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes a This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Cibola County comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each quar- during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children ter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M2 Cibola Children Adopted within 24 Months N2 Cibola Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 months 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome in Cibola County who have experienced no more than 2 placements since of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 13 Cibola County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Cibola County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O2 Cibola Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P2 Cibola Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Cibola County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quar- during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS ter. Source: pm02a01

Q2 Cibola Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R2 Cibola Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Cibola County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 14 Cibola County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

McKinley County Black Rock, Crown Point, Gallup, Navaho, Prewitt, Ramah, Red Rock, Thoreau, Tohatchi, Zuni

Population estimate under age 20: 25,206 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 4.4% Median household income, 2007-2011: $30,188 Children under 18 living in poverty: 39% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 3.5%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Charles Reado CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 863-9556 Regional Manager: Sarah Blackwell Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) McKinley County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A3 McKinley Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B3 McKinley Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation that Intake) received in McKinley County for the last 8 quarters. They include were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some inves- reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). tigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 15 McKinley County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

McKinley County: Investigations & Allegations

C3 McKinley Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D3 McKinley Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter McKinley Region State 26 253 1,284 Substantiated 36.1% 32.4% 30.7% 46 528 2,893 Unsubstantiated 63.9% 67.6% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 1.7% 18.7% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 55 453 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 2.2 3.2 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in McKinley County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northwest) and the state of New Mexico; as This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in McKinley well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E3 McKinley Investigation Dispositions F3 McKinley Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strategic capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. Source: investigation. Source: sm06a01c NCANDS

360 County Profiles 16 McKinley County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

McKinley County: Children in Care

G3 McKinley Foster Care Entries & Exits H3 McKinley Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in McKinley County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a McKinley County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and point-in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Busi- exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 ness and Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I3 McKinley Age Ranges of Children in Care J3 McKinley Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total McKinley 9 28 24 24 9 94 Region 1 65 158 112 97 75 507 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 13.8% 17.7% 21.4% 24.7% 12.0% 18.5% County % of State Total 2.3% 3.6% 3.9% 4.9% 2.4% 3.5% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0% This table illustrates the ages of children in care in McKinley County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care and statewide. Source: AFCARS in McKinley County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 17 McKinley County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

McKinley County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K3 McKinley “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L3 McKinley Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in McKinley County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes a This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in McKinley Coun- comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each quar- ty during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children ter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M3 McKinley Children Adopted within 24 Months N3 McKinley Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within 24 This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 months months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome of in McKinley County who have experienced no more than 2 placements since adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 18 McKinley County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

McKinley County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O3 McKinley Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P3 McKinley Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in McKinley County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q3 McKinley Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R3 McKinley Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in McKinley County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 19 McKinley County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

San Juan County Aztec, Bloomfield, Farmington, Flora Vista, Kirtland, Naschitti, Newcomb, Sanostee, Shiprock, Turlee

Population estimate under age 20: 40,134 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 7.0% Median household income, 2007-2011: $47,897 Children under 18 living in poverty: 30% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 4.5%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Nichole Garcia CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 327-5316 Regional Manager: Sarah Blackwell Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) San Juan County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A4 San Juan Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B4 San Juan Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation that Intake) received in San Juan County for the last 8 quarters. They include were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some inves- reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). tigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: Source: sm01a10 sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 20 San Juan County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

San Juan County: Investigations & Allegations

C4 San Juan Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D4 San Juan Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter San Juan Region State 79 253 1,284 Substantiated 32.8% 32.4% 30.7% 162 528 2,893 Unsubstantiated 67.2% 67.6% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 5.8% 18.7% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 149 453 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 3.6 3.2 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in San Juan County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northwest) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in San Juan as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E4 San Juan Investigation Dispositions F4 San Juan Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strategic capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. Source: investigation. Source: sm06a01c NCANDS

360 County Profiles 21 San Juan County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

San Juan County: Children in Care

G4 San Juan Foster Care Entries & Exits H4 San Juan Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in San Juan County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point San Juan County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I4 San Juan Age Ranges of Children in Care J4 San Juan Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total San Juan 19 34 23 24 21 121 Region 1 65 158 112 97 75 507 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 29.2% 21.5% 20.5% 24.7% 28.0% 23.9% County % of State Total 4.8% 4.3% 3.7% 4.9% 5.6% 4.5% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in San Juan County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS San Juan County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 22 San Juan County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

San Juan County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K4 San Juan “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L4 San Juan Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in San Juan County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in San Juan includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- each quarter. Source: sm0904 dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M4 San Juan Children Adopted within 24 Months N4 San Juan Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in San Juan County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 23 San Juan County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

San Juan County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O4 San Juan Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P4 San Juan Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in San Juan County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q4 San Juan Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R4 San Juan Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in San Juan County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 24 San Juan County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sandoval County Bernalillo, Corrales, Cuba, Jemez Springs, Placitas, Rio Rancho, San Ysidro

Population estimate under age 20: 38,163 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 6.6% Median household income, 2007-2011: $55,587 Children under 18 living in poverty: 19% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 2.7%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Jennifer Earp CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 867-2373 Regional Manager: Sarah Blackwell Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Sandoval County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A5 Sandoval Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B5 Sandoval Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Sandoval County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 25 Sandoval County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sandoval County: Investigations & Allegations

C5 Sandoval Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D5 Sandoval Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Sandoval Region State 37 253 1,284 Substantiated 20.9% 32.4% 30.7% 140 528 2,893 Unsubstantiated 79.1% 67.6% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 4.2% 18.7% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 59 453 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 1.5 3.2 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Sandoval County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northwest) and the state of New Mexico; as This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Sandoval well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E5 Sandoval Investigation Dispositions F5 Sandoval Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 26 Sandoval County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sandoval County: Children in Care

G5 Sandoval Foster Care Entries & Exits H5 Sandoval Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Sandoval County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Sandoval County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I5 Sandoval Age Ranges of Children in Care J5 Sandoval Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Sandoval 5 26 18 14 10 73 Region 1 65 158 112 97 75 507 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 7.7% 16.5% 16.1% 14.4% 13.3% 14.4% County % of State Total 1.3% 3.3% 2.9% 2.9% 2.7% 2.7% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Sandoval County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Sandoval County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 27 Sandoval County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sandoval County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K5 Sandoval “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L5 Sandoval Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Sando- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Sandoval val County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS each quarter. Source: sm0904

M5 Sandoval Children Adopted within 24 Months N5 Sandoval Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Sandoval County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 28 Sandoval County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sandoval County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O5 Sandoval Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P5 Sandoval Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Sandoval County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q5 Sandoval Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R5 Sandoval Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Sandoval County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 29 Sandoval County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Torrance County Encino, Estancia, Moriarty, Mountainair, Willard (PS County Office also covers Edgewood)

Population estimate under age 20: 4,101 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 0.7% Median household income, 2007-2011: $33,048 Children under 18 living in poverty: 40% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.2%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Michelle Threadgill CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 384-2745 Regional Manager: Sarah Blackwell Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Torrance County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A6 Torrance Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B6 Torrance Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Torrance County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 30 Torrance County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Torrance County: Investigations & Allegations

C6 Torrance Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D6 Torrance Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Torrance Region State 21 253 1,284 Substantiated 43.8% 32.4% 30.7% 27 528 2,893 Unsubstantiated 56.3% 67.6% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 1.1% 18.7% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 45 453 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 10.3 3.2 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Torrance County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northwest) and the state of New Mexico; as This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Torrance well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E6 Torrance Investigation Dispositions F6 Torrance Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 31 Torrance County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Torrance County: Children in Care

G6 Torrance Foster Care Entries & Exits H6 Torrance Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Torrance County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Torrance County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I6 Torrance Age Ranges of Children in Care J6 Torrance Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Torrance 3 11 8 7 3 32 Region 1 65 158 112 97 75 507 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 4.6% 7.0% 7.1% 7.2% 4.0% 6.3% County % of State Total 0.8% 1.4% 1.3% 1.4% 0.8% 1.2% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Torrance County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Torrance County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 32 Torrance County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Torrance County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K6 Torrance “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L6 Torrance Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Tor- rance County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Torrance includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- each quarter. Source: sm0904 dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M6 Torrance Children Adopted within 24 Months N6 Torrance Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Torrance County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 33 Torrance County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Torrance County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O6 Torrance Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P6 Torrance Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Torrance County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q6 Torrance Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R6 Torrance Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Torrance County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 34 Torrance County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Valencia County Adelino, Belen, Bosque Farms, Los Lunas, Los Trujillos, Peralta, Valencia

Population estimate under age 20: 21,906 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 3.8% Median household income, 2007-2011: $41,254 Children under 18 living in poverty: 36% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 5.7%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Kim Chavez-Buie CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 865-4634 Regional Manager: Sarah Blackwell Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Valencia County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A7 Valencia Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B7 Valencia Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Valencia County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 35 Valencia County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Valencia County: Investigations & Allegations

C7 Valencia Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D7 Valencia Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Valencia Region State 70 253 1,284 Substantiated 35.7% 32.4% 30.7% 126 528 2,893 Unsubstantiated 64.3% 67.6% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 4.7% 18.7% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 110 453 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 4.9 3.2 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Valencia County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northwest) and the state of New Mexico; as This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Valencia well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E7 Valencia Investigation Dispositions F7 Valencia Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 36 Valencia County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Valencia County: Children in Care

G7 Valencia Foster Care Entries & Exits H7 Valencia Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Valencia County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Valencia County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I7 Valencia Age Ranges of Children in Care J7 Valencia Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Valencia 22 42 33 26 29 152 Region 1 65 158 112 97 75 507 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 33.8% 26.6% 29.5% 26.8% 38.7% 30.0% County % of State Total 5.6% 5.3% 5.4% 5.3% 7.7% 5.7% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Valencia County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Valencia County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 37 Valencia County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Valencia County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K7 Valencia “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L7 Valencia Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Valen- cia County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Valencia cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- each quarter. Source: sm0904 dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M7 Valencia Children Adopted within 24 Months N7 Valencia Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Valencia County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This this is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit co- ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses hort based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 38 Valencia County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Valencia County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O7 Valencia Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P7 Valencia Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Valencia County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q7 Valencia Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R7 Valencia Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Valencia County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 39 Valencia County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Colfax & Union Counties COLFAX: Angel Fire, Cimarron, Eagle Nest, Maxwell, Miami, Raton, Springer UNION: Amistad, Capulin, Clayton, Des Moines, Folsom, Grenville, Mount Dora, Seneca

Population estimate under age 20: 3,968 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 0.7% Average median household income, 2007-2011: $36,149 Children under 18 living in poverty: 21% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.0%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Annette Vigil CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 445-2358 (Colfax) (575) 374-9862 (Union) Regional Manager: Joy Weathers Regional Office: (505) 425-9335

Colfax/Union Counties: Intakes & Investigations *Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) and NM Protective Services Data

A8 Colfax/Union Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B8 Colfax/Union Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Colfax/Union for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 40 Colfax & Union Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Colfax/Union Counties: Investigations & Allegations

C8 Colfax/Union Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D8 Colfax/Union Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Colfax/Union Region State 16 205 1,284 Substantiated 50.0% 40.1% 30.7% 16 306 2,893 Unsubstantiated 50.0% 59.9% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 0.8% 12.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 26 349 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 6.2 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Colfax/Union as they compare to the counties’ entire region (Northeast) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Colfax/ as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: Union during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one type sm06a01c of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E8 Colfax/Union Investigation Dispositions F8 Colfax/Union Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 41 Colfax & Union Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Colfax/Union Counties: Children in Care

G8 Colfax/Union Foster Care Entries & Exits H8 Colfax/Union Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Colfax/Union. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Colfax/Union for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I8 Colfax/Union Age Ranges of Children in Care J8 Colfax/Union Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Colfax/Union 5 9 5 5 2 26 Region 2 47 84 75 54 33 293 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 10.6% 10.7% 6.7% 9.3% 6.1% 8.9% County % of State Total 1.3% 1.1% 0.8% 1.0% 0.5% 1.0% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Colfax/Union as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Colfax/Union, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 42 Colfax & Union Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Colfax/Union Counties: Outcomes for Children in Care

K8 Colfax/Union “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L8 Colfax/Union Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Colfax/ Union who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes a This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Colfax/Union comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each quar- during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children ter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M8 Colfax/Union Children Adopted within 24 Months N8 Colfax/Union Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Colfax/Union who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on thefederal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 43 Colfax & Union Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Colfax/Union Counties: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O8 Colfax/Union Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P8 Colfax/Union Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Colfax & Union Counties for the last 6 quarters. that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care Each quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS quarter. Source: pm02a01

Q8 Colfax/Union Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R8 Colfax/Union Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Colfax/Union for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS pm04b07 Human Resources Data

360 County Profiles 44 Colfax & Union Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Guadalupe, Mora, & San Miguel Counties GUADALUPE: Cuervo, Dilla, Newkirk, Santa Rosa, Vaughn MORA: Mora, Ocate, Wagon Mound SAN MIGUEL: Bell Ranch, Las Vegas, Pecos, San Augustin, Sapello, Villanueva

Population estimate under age 20: 9,493 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 1.7% Average median household income, 2007-2011: $30,288 Children under 18 living in poverty: 36% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 2.7%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Christine Archuleta CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 425-9335 Regional Manager: Joy Weathers Regional Office: (505) 425-9335

*Based on US Census American Community Survey Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Counties: Intakes & Investigations (2009-2013) and NM Protective Services Data A9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel B9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel for the last 8 quarters. that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some They include reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. in (accepted). Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 45 Guadalupe, Mora, & San Miguel Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Counties: Investigations & Allegations

C9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel D9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Investigation Outcomes: County & Region Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Region State 25 205 1,284 Substantiated 32.5% 40.1% 30.7% 52 306 2,893 Unsubstantiated 67.5% 59.9% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 1.8% 12.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 34 349 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 3.4 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel as they compare to the counties’ entire region (Northeast) and the state of New This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Guada- Mexico; as well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the popu- lupe/Mora/San Miguel during the quarter. Some investigations will involve lation. Source: sm06a01c more than one type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel F9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Investigation Dispositions Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 46 Guadalupe, Mora, & San Miguel Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Counties: Children in Care

G9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel H9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Foster Care Entries & Exits Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in children in care to those in the county population under age 20. The data is Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel for the last eight quarters. Some children may taken from a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bu- enter and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 reau of Business and Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel J9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Age Ranges of Children in Care Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Guadalupe/Mora /San Miguel 11 19 22 11 10 73 Region 2 47 84 75 54 33 293 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 23.4% 22.6% 29.3% 20.4% 30.3% 24.9% County % of State Total 2.8% 2.4% 3.6% 2.2% 2.7% 2.7% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in care in the region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 47 Guadalupe, Mora, & San Miguel Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Counties: Outcomes for Children in Care

K9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel L9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Guada- lupe/Mora/San Miguel who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quar- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Guadalupe/ ters. It includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stay- Mora/San Miguel during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” ers” for each quarter. Source: sm0904 or children entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel N9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Children Adopted within 24 Months Placement Stability: Trends

This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within months in Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel who have experienced no more 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome than 2 placements since entering care. This is a strategic planning meas- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ure that uses entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS AFCARS

360 County Profiles 48 Guadalupe, Mora, & San Miguel Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Counties: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel P9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Guadalupe, Mora, & San Miguel Counties for the that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care last 6 quarters. Each quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS the end of the quarter. Source: pm02a01

Q9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel R9 Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel Provider Inquiries by Referral Source Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and permanency planning workers in Guadalupe/Mora/San Miguel for the last This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of referral for the eight quarters. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Note: Not all accepted total full-time positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: pm04b07 PS Human Resources Data

360 County Profiles 49 Guadalupe, Mora, & San Miguel Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Counties LOS ALAMOS: Los Alamos RIO ARRIBA: Alcade, Abiquiu, Chama, Chimayo, Coyote, Dulce, Espanola, San Juan, Santa Clara, Tierra Amarilla, Tres Piedras Population estimate under age 20: 15,543 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 2.7% Median household income, 2007-2011: $106,148 (Los Alamos) $39,004 (Rio Arriba) Children under 18 living in poverty: 4% (Los Alamos) 25% (Rio Arriba) Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 3.5% CYFD-PS County Manager: Paula Dominguez CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 445-2358 Regional Manager: Joy Weathers Regional Office: (505) 425-9335

Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Counties: Intakes & Investigations *Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) and NM Protective Services Data A10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba B10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Los Alamos/Rio Arriba for the last 8 quarters. They that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some include reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. (accepted). Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 50 Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Counties: Investigations & Allegations

C10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba D10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Investigation Outcomes: County & Region Substantiated Allegations by Type SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Colfax/Union Region 16 205 Substantiated 50.0% 40.1% 16 306 Unsubstantiated 50.0% 59.9% % of State Total Investigations 0.8% 12.2%

# of Child Victims 26 349

Victim Rate per 1,000 6.2 4.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Los Alamos/Rio Arriba as they compare to the counties’ entire region (Northeast) and the state of New This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Los Ala- Mexico; as well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the popu- mos/Rio Arriba during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more lation. Source: sm06a01c than one type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Investigation Dispositions F10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 51 Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Counties: Children in Care

G10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Foster Care Entries & Exits H10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Los Alamos/Rio Arriba. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in care to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a Los Alamos/Rio Arriba for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter point-in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 and Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba J10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Sibling Groups in Foster Care Age Ranges of Children in Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Los Alamos/Rio Arriba 11 26 26 21 8 92 Region 2 47 84 75 54 33 293 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 23.4% 31.0% 34.7% 38.9% 24.2% 31.4% County % of State Total 2.8% 3.3% 4.2% 4.3% 2.1% 3.5% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Los Alamos/Rio Arriba as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in the region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Los Alamos/Rio Arriba, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 52 Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Counties: Outcomes for Children in Care

K10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba L10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Los Alamos/Rio Arriba who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Los Alamos/ It includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” Rio Arriba during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or for each quarter. Source: sm0904 children entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba N10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Placement Stability: Trends Children Adopted within 24 Months

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Los Alamos/Rio Arriba who have experienced no more than 2 of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort placements since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS uses entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 53 Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Counties: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba P10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Counties for the last 6 that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarters. Each quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS of the quarter. Source: pm02a01

Q10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba R10 Los Alamos/Rio Arriba Provider Inquiries by Referral Source Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and permanency planning workers in Los Alamos/Rio Arriba for the last eight This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of referral for the quarters. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Note: Not all accepted -time positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Hu- inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: pm04b07 man Resources Data

360 County Profiles 54 Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Santa Fe County Agua Fria, Glorieta, Jaconita, La Cienega, Pojoaque, Santa Fe, Stanley, Tesuque (Edgewood covered by Torrance Co. PS Office)

Population estimate under age 20: 33,191 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 5.8% Median household income, 2007-2011: $50,826 Children under 18 living in poverty: 24% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 2.0%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Matthew Esquibel CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 827-7450 Regional Manager: Joy Weathers Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Santa Fe County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A11 Santa Fe Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B11 Santa Fe Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Santa Fe County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 55 Santa Fe County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Santa Fe County: Investigations & Allegations

C11 Santa Fe Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D11 Santa Fe Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Santa Fe Region State 88 205 1,284 Substantiated 41.1% 40.1% 30.7% 126 306 2,893 Unsubstantiated 58.9% 59.9% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 5.1% 12.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 153 349 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 4.6 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Santa Fe County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northeast) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Santa Fe as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E11 Santa Fe Investigation Dispositions F11 Santa Fe Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 56 Santa Fe County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Santa Fe County: Children in Care

G11 Santa Fe Foster Care Entries & Exits H11 Santa Fe Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Santa Fe County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Santa Fe County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I11 Santa Fe Age Ranges of Children in Care J11 Santa Fe Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Santa Fe 7 15 12 12 8 54 Region 2 47 84 75 54 33 293 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 14.9% 17.9% 16.0% 22.2% 24.2% 18.4% County % of State Total 1.8% 1.9% 2.0% 2.4% 2.1% 2.0% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Santa Fe County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Santa Fe County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 57 Santa Fe County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Santa Fe County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K11 Santa Fe “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L11 Santa Fe Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Santa Fe County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Santa Fe cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- each quarter. Source: sm0904 dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M11 Santa Fe Children Adopted within 24 Months N11 Santa Fe Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Santa Fe County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 58 Santa Fe County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Santa Fe County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O11 Santa Fe Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P11 Santa Fe Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Santa Fe County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q12 Santa Fe Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R11 Santa Fe Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Santa Fe County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 59 Santa Fe County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Taos County Arroyo Hondo, Chamisal, Penasco, Questa, Ranchos de Taos, Red River, Taos

Population estimate under age 20: 7,242 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 1.3% Median household income, 2007-2011: $32,274 Children under 18 living in poverty: 43% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.8%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Melissa Montoya CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 758-8871 Regional Manager: Joy Weathers Regional Office: (505) 865-4634

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Taos County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A12 Taos Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B12 Taos Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Taos County for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 60 Taos County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Taos County: Investigations & Allegations

C12 Taos Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D12 Taos Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Taos Region State 36 205 1,284 Substantiated 42.4% 40.1% 30.7% 49 306 2,893 Unsubstantiated 57.6% 59.9% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 2.0% 12.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 67 349 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 9.0 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Taos County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Northeast) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Taos as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E12 Taos Investigation Dispositions F12 Taos Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 61 Taos County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Taos County: Children in Care

G12 Taos Foster Care Entries & Exits H12 Taos Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Taos County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Taos County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I12 Taos Age Ranges of Children in Care J12 Taos Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Taos 13 15 10 5 5 48 Region 2 47 84 75 54 33 293 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 27.7% 17.9% 13.3% 9.3% 15.2% 16.4% County % of State Total 3.3% 1.9% 1.6% 1.0% 1.3% 1.8% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Taos County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Taos County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 62 Taos County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Taos County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K12 Taos “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L12 Taos Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Taos County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Taos County a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M12 Taos Children Adopted within 24 Months N12 Taos Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Taos County who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on thefederal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 63 Taos County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Taos County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O12 Taos Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P12 Taos Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Taos County for the last 6 quarters. Each quar- that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care ter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q12 Taos Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R12 Taos Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Taos County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 64 Taos County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Bernalillo County Albuquerque, Carnuel, Cedar Crest, Chilili, Corrales, Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, North Valley, Rio Rancho, South Valley, Tijeras

Population estimate under age 20: 176,107 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 30.7% Median household income, 2007-2011: $47,128 Children under 18 living in poverty: 25% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 41.2%

Regional Manager: Delphine Trujillo Regional Office: (505) 841-7800

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Bernalillo County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A13 Bernalillo Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B13 Bernalillo Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Bernalillo County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 65 Bernalillo County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Bernalillo County: Investigations & Allegations

C13 Bernalillo Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D13 Bernalillo Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Bernalillo Region State 332 332 1,284 Substantiated 29.6% 29.6% 30.7% 789 789 2,893 Unsubstantiated 70.4% 70.4% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 26.8% 26.8% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 542 542 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 3.0 3.0 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Bernalillo County as they compare This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Bernalil- to the state of New Mexico; as well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 lo County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one children in the population. Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E13 Bernalillo Investigation Dispositions F13 Bernalillo Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county and state data. This is a strategic plan- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the ning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. Source: investigation. Source: sm06a01c NCANDS

360 County Profiles 66 Bernalillo County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Bernalillo County: Children in Care

G13 Bernalillo Foster Care Entries & Exits H13 Bernalillo Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Bernalillo County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Bernalillo County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I13 Bernalillo Age Ranges of Children in Care J13 Bernalillo Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Bernalillo 160 334 237 216 150 1097 Region 3 160 334 237 216 150 1097 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% County % of State Total 40.7% 42.4% 38.5% 44.0% 39.9% 41.2% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Bernalillo County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Bernalillo County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 67 Bernalillo County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Bernalillo County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K13 Bernalillo “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L13 Bernalillo Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Berna- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Bernalillo lillo County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS each quarter. Source: sm0904

M13 Bernalillo Children Adopted within 24 Months N13 Bernalillo Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Bernalillo County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 68 Bernalillo County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Bernalillo County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O13 Bernalillo Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P13 Bernalillo Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Bernalillo County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q13 Bernalillo Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R13 Bernalillo Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Bernalillo County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 69 Bernalillo County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter CYFD-PS County Managers: Brenda Manus (Act.) Joseph Madrid CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 841-7800 Bernalillo East: Investigations & Allegations (505) 841-2910

B14 Bernalillo East Investigation Outcomes: Trends D14 Bernalillo East Substantiated Allegations by Type

This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Bernalil- investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. lo East during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E14 Bernalillo East Investigation Dispositions G14 Bernalillo East Foster Care Entries & Exits

This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the Bernalillo East for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit investigation. Source: sm06a01c care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904

360 County Profiles 70 Bernalillo East SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Bernalillo East: Short Stays in Foster Care & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

K14 Bernalillo East “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends R14 Bernalillo East Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Berna- and permanency planning workers in Bernalillo East for the last eight quar- lillo East who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- ters. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full- cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for time positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS each quarter. Source: sm0904 Human Resources Data

360 County Profiles 71 Bernalillo East SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

CYFD-PS County Managers: Christina Nuanes (Act.) Jeromy Brazfield CYFD-PS County Office: (505) 841-2900 Bernalillo West: Investigations & Allegations (505) 841-7800

B15 Bernalillo West Investigation Outcomes: Trends D15 Bernalillo West Substantiated Allegations by Type

This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Bernalil- investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. lo West during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E15 Bernalillo West Investigation Dispositions G15 Bernalillo West Foster Care Entries & Exits

This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the Bernalillo West for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit investigation. Source: sm06a01c care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904

360 County Profiles 72 Bernalillo West SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Bernalillo West: Short Stays in Foster Care & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

K15 Bernalillo West “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends R15 Bernalillo West Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Berna- permanency planning workers in Bernalillo West for the last eight quarters. lillo West who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human each quarter. Source: sm0904 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 73 Bernalillo West SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Chaves County Dexter, Hagerman, Lake Arthur, Roswell

Population estimate under age 20: 20,518 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 3.6% Median household income, 2007-2011: $39,076 Children under 18 living in poverty: 30% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 2.2%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Matthew Rael CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 624-6071 Regional Manager: Virginia Villarreal Regional Office: (575) 624-6190

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Chaves County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A16 Chaves Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B16 Chaves Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Chaves County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 74 Chaves County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Chaves County: Investigations & Allegations

C16 Chaves Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D16 Chaves Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Chaves Region State 51 204 1,284 Substantiated 20.7% 28.5% 30.7% 195 513 2,893 Unsubstantiated 79.3% 71.5% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 5.9% 17.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 101 403 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 4.9 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Chaves County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southeast) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Chaves as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E16 Chaves Investigation Dispositions F16 Chaves Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 75 Chaves County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Chaves County: Children in Care

G16 Chaves Foster Care Entries & Exits H16 Chaves Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Chaves County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Chaves County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I16 Chaves Age Ranges of Children in Care J16 Chaves Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Chaves 5 22 8 10 14 59 Region 4 66 107 90 59 72 394 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 7.6% 20.6% 8.9% 16.9% 19.4% 15.0% County % of State Total 1.3% 2.8% 1.3% 2.0% 3.7% 2.2% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Chaves County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Chaves County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 76 Chaves County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Chaves County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K16 Chaves “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L16 Chaves Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Chaves County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Chaves Coun- a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each ty during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M16 Chaves Children Adopted within 24 Months N16 Chaves Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Chaves County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 77 Chaves County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Chaves County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O16 Chaves Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P16 Chaves Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Chaves County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q16 Chaves Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R16 Chaves Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Chaves County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 78 Chaves County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Curry County Broadview, Clovis, Grady, Melrose, Texico

Population estimate under age 20: 15,180 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 2.6% Median household income, 2007-2011: $38,373 Children under 18 living in poverty: 29% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 2.2%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Tamara Letcher CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 763-0014 Regional Manager: Virginia Villarreal Regional Office: (575) 624-6190

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Curry County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A17 Curry Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B17 Curry Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Curry County for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 79 Curry County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Curry County: Investigations & Allegations

C17 Curry Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D17 Curry Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Curry Region State 28 204 1,284 Substantiated 28.3% 28.5% 30.7% 71 513 2,893 Unsubstantiated 71.7% 71.5% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 2.4% 17.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 59 403 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 3.9 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Curry County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southeast) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Curry as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E17 Curry Investigation Dispositions F17 Curry Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 80 Curry County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Curry County: Children in Care

G17 Curry Foster Care Entries & Exits H17 Curry Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Curry County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Curry County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I17 Curry Age Ranges of Children in Care J17 Curry Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Curry 13 13 12 6 15 59 Region 4 66 107 90 59 72 394 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 19.7% 12.1% 13.3% 10.2% 20.8% 15.0% County % of State Total 3.3% 1.6% 2.0% 1.2% 4.0% 2.2% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Curry County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Curry County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 81 Curry County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Curry County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K17 Curry “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L17 Curry Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Curry County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Curry County a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M17 Curry Children Adopted within 24 Months N17 Curry Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Curry County who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 82 Curry County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Curry County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O17 Curry Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P17 Curry Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Curry County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q17 Curry Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R17 Curry Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Curry County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 83 Curry County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

De Baca, Harding, & Quay Counties DE BACA: Fort Sumner, Taiban, Yeso HARDING: Mills, Mosquero, Roy, Solano QUAY: Bard, House, Logan, McAlister, Nara Vista, San Jon, Tucumcari

Population estimate under age 20: 2,958 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 0.5% Average median household income, 2007-2011: $29,108 Children under 18 living in poverty: 31% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 0.7%

CYFD-PS County Manager: George Arguello CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 461-0110 Regional Manager: Virginia Villarreal Regional Office: (575) 624-6190

*Based on US Census American Community Survey De Baca/Harding/Quay: Intakes & Investigations (2009-2013) and NM Protective Services Data

A18 De Baca/Harding/Quay B18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in De Baca/Harding/Quay for the last 8 quarters. They that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some include reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. (accepted). Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 84 De Baca, Harding, & Quay Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

De Baca/Harding/Quay Counties: Investigations & Allegations

C18 De Baca/Harding/Quay D18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Investigation Outcomes: County & Region Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter DeBaca/Harding/Quay Region State 16 204 1,284 Substantiated 34.8% 28.5% 30.7% 30 513 2,893 Unsubstantiated 65.2% 71.5% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 1.1% 17.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 25 403 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 9.0 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in De Baca/Harding/Quay as they compare to the counties’ entire region (Southeast) and the state of New This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in De Mexico; as well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the popu- Baca/Harding/Quay during the quarter. Some investigations will involve lation. Source: sm06a01c more than one type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E18 De Baca/Harding/Quay F18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Investigation Dispositions Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 85 De Baca, Harding, & Quay Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

De Baca/Harding/Quay Counties: Children in Care

G18 De Baca/Harding/Quay H18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Foster Care Entries & Exits Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in De Baca/Harding/Quay . It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in in care to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from De Baca/Harding/Quay Counties for the last eight quarters. Some children a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Busi- may enter and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 ness and Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I18 De Baca/Harding/Quay J18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Age Ranges of Children in Care Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total DeBaca/Harding /Quay 3 2 5 3 5 18 Region 4 66 107 90 59 72 394 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 4.5% 1.9% 5.6% 5.1% 6.9% 4.6% County % of State Total 0.8% 0.3% 0.8% 0.6% 1.3% 0.7% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0% This table illustrates the ages of children in care in De Baca/Harding/Quay as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in the region and statewide. Source: AFCARS De Baca/Harding/Quay, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 86 De Baca, Harding, & Quay Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

De Baca/Harding/Quay Counties: Outcomes for Children in Care

K18 De Baca/Harding/Quay L18 De Baca/Harding/Quay “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in De Baca/Harding/Quay who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quar- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in De Baca/ ters. It includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stay- Harding/Quay during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or ers” for each quarter. Source: sm0904 children entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M18 De Baca/Harding/Quay N18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Children Adopted within 24 Months Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in De Baca/Harding/Quay who have experienced no more than 2 of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort placements since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS uses entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 87 De Baca, Harding, & Quay Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

De Baca/Harding/Quay Counties: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O18 De Baca/Harding/Quay P18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in De Baca, Harding, & Quay Counties for the last that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care 6 quarters. Each quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS end of the quarter. Source: pm02a01

Q18 De Baca/Harding/Quay R18 De Baca/Harding/Quay Provider Inquiries by Referral Source Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and permanency planning workers in De Baca/Harding/Quay for the last eight This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of referral for the quarters. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Note: Not all accepted -time positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Hu- inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: pm04b07 man Resources Data

360 County Profiles 88 De Baca, Harding, & Quay Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Eddy County Artesia, Carlsbad, Hope, Loco Hills, Loving

Population estimate under age 20: 15,667 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 2.7% Median household income, 2007-2011: $46,965 Children under 18 living in poverty: 13% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 3.8%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Maria Calderon CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 748-1221 (Artesia) (575) 887-3576 (Carlsbad) Regional Manager: Virginia Villarreal Regional Office: (575) 624-6190

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Eddy County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A19 Eddy Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B19 Eddy Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Eddy County for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 89 Eddy County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Eddy County: Investigations & Allegations

C19 Eddy Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D19 Eddy Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Eddy Region State 25 204 1,284 Substantiated 20.2% 28.5% 30.7% 99 513 2,893 Unsubstantiated 79.8% 71.5% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 3.0% 17.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 36 403 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 2.3 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Eddy County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southeast) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Eddy as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E19 Eddy Investigation Dispositions F19 Eddy Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 90 Eddy County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Eddy County: Children in Care

G19 Eddy Foster Care Entries & Exits H19 Eddy Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Eddy County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Eddy County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I19 Eddy Age Ranges of Children in Care J19 Eddy Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Eddy 21 28 25 13 14 101 Region 4 66 107 90 59 72 394 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 31.8% 26.2% 27.8% 22.0% 19.4% 25.6% County % of State Total 5.3% 3.6% 4.1% 2.6% 3.7% 3.8% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Eddy County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Eddy County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 91 Eddy County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Eddy County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K19 Eddy “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L19 Eddy Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Eddy County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Eddy County a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M19 Eddy Children Adopted within 24 Months N19 Eddy Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Eddy County who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This measure is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry cohort based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 92 Eddy County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Eddy County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O19 Eddy Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P19 Eddy Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Eddy County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q19 Eddy Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R19 Eddy Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Eddy County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 93 Eddy County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lea County Caprock, Crossroads, Eunice, Hobbs, Jal, Lovington, Maljamar, Monument, Tatum

Population estimate under age 20: 21,217 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 3.7% Median household income, 2007-2011: $48,434 Children under 18 living in poverty: 22% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 5.0%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Patricia Garza CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 397-3450 Regional Manager: Virginia Villarreal Regional Office: (575) 624-6190

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Lea County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A20 Lea Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B20 Lea Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Lea County for the last 8 quarters. They include reports that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). Source: investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 94 Lea County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lea County: Investigations & Allegations

C20 Lea Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D20 Lea Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Lea Region State 65 204 1,284 Substantiated 38.9% 28.5% 30.7% 102 513 2,893 Unsubstantiated 61.1% 71.5% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 4.0% 17.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 138 403 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 6.6 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Lea County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southeast) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Lea as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E20 Lea Investigation Dispositions F20 Lea Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 95 Lea County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lea County: Children in Care

G20 Lea Foster Care Entries & Exits H20 Lea Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Lea County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Lea County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I20 Lea Age Ranges of Children in Care J20 Lea Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Lea 21 33 34 22 23 133 Region 4 66 107 90 59 72 394 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 31.8% 30.8% 37.8% 37.3% 31.9% 33.8% County % of State Total 5.3% 4.2% 5.5% 4.5% 6.1% 5.0% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Lea County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Lea County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 96 Lea County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lea County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K20 Lea “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L20 Lea Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Lea County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Lea County a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M20 Lea Children Adopted within 24 Months N20 Lea Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Lea County who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 97 Lea County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lea County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O20 Lea Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P20 Lea Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Lea County for the last 6 quarters. Each quar- that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care ter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q20 Lea Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R20 Lea Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Lea County for the last eight quarters. Va- referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. cancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time posi- Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: tions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human Re- pm04b07 sources Data

360 County Profiles 98 Lea County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Roosevelt County Causey, Dora, Elida, Floyd, Milnesand, Pep, Portales

Population estimate under age 20: 6,155 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 1.1% Median household income, 2007-2011: $37,161 Children under 18 living in poverty: 33% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 0.9%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Tamara Letcher CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 356-6688 Regional Manager: Virginia Villarreal Regional Office: (575) 624-6190

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Roosevelt County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A21 Roosevelt Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B21 Roosevelt Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Roosevelt County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 99 Roosevelt County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Roosevelt County: Investigations & Allegations

C21 Roosevelt Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D21 Roosevelt Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Roosevelt Region State 19 204 1,284 Substantiated 54.3% 28.5% 30.7% 16 513 2,893 Unsubstantiated 45.7% 71.5% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 0.8% 17.2% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 44 403 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 7.0 4.9 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Roosevelt County as they com- pare to the county’s entire region (Southeast) and the state of New Mexico; This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Roose- as well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. velt County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than Source: sm06a01c one type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E21 Roosevelt Investigation Dispositions F21 Roosevelt Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 100 Roosevelt County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Roosevelt County: Children in Care

G21 Roosevelt Foster Care Entries & Exits H21 Roosevelt Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Roosevelt County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Roosevelt County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I21 Roosevelt Age Ranges of Children in Care J21 Roosevelt Sibling Groups in Foster Care

Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Roosevelt 3 9 6 5 1 24 Region 4 66 107 90 59 72 394 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 4.5% 8.4% 6.7% 8.5% 1.4% 6.1% County % of State Total 0.8% 1.1% 1.0% 1.0% 0.3% 0.9% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Roosevelt County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Roosevelt County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 101 Roosevelt County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Roosevelt County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K21 Roosevelt “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L21 Roosevelt Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Roose- velt County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Roosevelt includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- each quarter. Source: sm0904 dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M21 Roosevelt Children Adopted within 24 Months N21 Roosevelt Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Roosevelt County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 102 Roosevelt County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Roosevelt County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O21 Roosevelt Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P21 Roosevelt Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Roosevelt County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q21 Roosevelt Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R21 Roosevelt Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Roosevelt County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 103 Roosevelt County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Catron & Grant Counties CATRON: Aragon, Datil, Glenwood, Pie Town, Quemado, Reserve GRANT: Bayard, Buckhorn, Hanover, Hurley, Mimbres, Pinos Altos, San Lorenzo, Silver City

Population estimate under age 20: 7,702 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 1.3% Average median household income, 2007-2011: $33,366 Children under 18 living in poverty: 26% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.5%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Melissa Marquez-Gonzales CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 538-2945 Regional Manager: Cecilia Rosales Regional Office: (575) 373-6490

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Catron/Grant Counties: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A22 Catron/Grant Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B22 Catron/Grant Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Catron/Grant for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 104 Catron & Grant Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Catron/Grant Counties: Investigations & Allegations

C22 Catron/Grant Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D22 Catron/Grant Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Catron/Grant Region State 41 290 1,284 Substantiated 35.0% 27.7% 30.7% 76 757 2,893 Unsubstantiated 65.0% 72.3% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 2.8% 25.1% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 72 514 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 9.2 4.7 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Catron/Grant as they compare to the counties’ entire region (Southwest) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Catron/ as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: Grant during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one type sm06a01c of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E22 Catron/Grant Investigation Dispositions F22 Catron/Grant Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 105 Catron & Grant Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Catron/Grant Counties: Children in Care

G22 Catron/Grant Foster Care Entries & Exits H22 Catron/Grant Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Catron/Grant. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Catron/Grant for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I22 Catron/Grant Age Ranges of Children in Care J22 Catron/Grant Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Catron/Grant 5 14 15 4 2 40 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 9.1% 13.3% 14.9% 6.2% 4.3% 10.8% County % of State Total 1.3% 1.8% 2.4% 0.8% 0.5% 1.5% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Catron/Grant as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Catron/Grant, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 106 Catron & Grant Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Catron/Grant Counties: Outcomes for Children in Care

K22 Catron/Grant “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L22 Catron/Grant Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Catron/Grant who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Catron/Grant includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children each quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M22 Catron/Grant Children Adopted within 24 Months N22 Catron/Grant Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Catron/Grant who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 107 Catron & Grant Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Catron/Grant Counties: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O22 Catron/Grant Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P22 Catron/Grant Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Catron & Grant Counties for the last 6 quar- that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care ters. Each quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS the quarter. Source: pm02a01

Q22 Catron/Grant Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R22 Catron/Grant Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Catron/Grant for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 108 Catron & Grant Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Doña Ana County Anthony, Chaprral, Hatch, Las Cruces, Mesilla, Mesquite, Radium Springs, Rincon, Salem, Santa Teresa, Sunland Park, Vado, White Sands

Population estimate under age 20: 64,333 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 11.2% Average median household income, 2007-2011: $36,782 Children under 18 living in poverty: 39% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 5.3%

CYFD-PS County Managers: Aaron Salas Vacant CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 373-6490 Regional Manager: Cecilia Rosales Regional Office: (575) 373-6490 *Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Doña Ana County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A23 Doña Ana Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B23 Doña Ana Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central Intake) received in Doña Ana County for the last 8 quarters. They include This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some Source: sm01a10 investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 109 Dona Ana County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Doña Ana County: Investigations & Allegations

C23 Doña Ana Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D23 Doña Ana Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Doña Ana Region State 143 290 1,284 Substantiated 25.8% 27.7% 30.7% 412 757 2,893 Unsubstantiated 74.2% 72.3% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 13.3% 25.1% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 259 514 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 4.0 4.7 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Doña Ana County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southwest) and the state of New Mexico; as This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Doña Ana well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E23 Doña Ana Investigation Dispositions F23 Doña Ana Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 110 Dona Ana County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Doña Ana County: Children in Care

G23 Doña Ana Foster Care Entries & Exits H23 Doña Ana Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Doña Ana County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Doña Ana County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I23 Doña Ana Age Ranges of Children in Care J23 Doña Ana Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Dona Ana 25 31 33 28 23 140 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 45.5% 29.5% 32.7% 43.1% 50.0% 37.6% County % of State Total 6.4% 3.9% 5.4% 5.7% 6.1% 5.3% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Doña Ana County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Doña Ana County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 111 Dona Ana County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Doña Ana County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K23 Doña Ana “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L23 Doña Ana Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Doña Ana County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Doña Ana includes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- each quarter. Source: sm0904 dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M23 Doña Ana Children Adopted within 24 Months N23 Doña Ana Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Doña Ana County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure uses an exit cohort based ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 112 Dona Ana County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Doña Ana County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O23 Doña Ana Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P23 Doña Ana Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Doña Ana County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q23 Doña Ana Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R23 Doña Ana Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Doña Ana County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 113 Dona Ana County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Hidalgo & Luna Counties HIDALGO: Animas, Cloverdale, Lordsburg, Virden LUNA: Columbus, Deming

Population estimate under age 20: 8,779 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 1.5% Average median household income, 2007-2011: $29,817 Children under 18 living in poverty: 48% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.0%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Debbie Orona CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 546-6557 Regional Manager: Cecilia Rosales Regional Office: (575) 373-6490

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Hidalgo/Luna Counties: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A24 Hidalgo/Luna Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B24 Hidalgo/Luna Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Hidalgo/Luna for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 114 Hidalgo & Luna Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Hidalgo/Luna: Investigations & Allegations

C24 Hidalgo/Luna Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D24 Hidalgo/Luna Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Hidalgo/Luna Region State 38 290 1,284 Substantiated 33.0% 27.7% 30.7% 77 757 2,893 Unsubstantiated 67.0% 72.3% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 2.8% 25.1% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 58 514 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 6.6 4.7 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Hidalgo/Luna as they compare to the counties’ entire region (Southwest) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Hidalgo/ as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: Luna during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one type sm06a01c of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E24 Hidalgo/Luna Investigation Dispositions F24 Hidalgo/Luna Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 115 Hidalgo & Luna Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Hidalgo/Luna Counties: Children in Care

G24 Hidalgo/Luna Foster Care Entries & Exits H24 Hidalgo/Luna Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Hidalgo/Luna. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Hidalgo/Luna for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I24 Hidalgo/Luna Age Ranges of Children in Care J24 Hidalgo/Luna Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Hidalgo/Luna 1 8 7 7 4 27 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 1.8% 7.6% 6.9% 10.8% 8.7% 7.3% County % of State Total 0.3% 1.0% 1.1% 1.4% 1.1% 1.0% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Hidalgo/Luna as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Hidalgo/Luna, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 116 Hidalgo & Luna Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Hidalgo/Luna Counties: Outcomes for Children in Care

K24 Hidalgo/Luna “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L24 Hidalgo/Luna Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Hidal- go/Luna who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Hidalgo/Luna cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children each quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M24 Hidalgo/Luna Children Adopted within 24 Months N24 Hidalgo/Luna Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Hidalgo/Luna who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 117 Hidalgo & Luna Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Hidalgo/Luna Counties: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O24 Hidalgo/Luna Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P24 Hidalgo/Luna Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Hidalgo & Luna Counties for the last 6 quar- that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care ters. Each quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS the quarter. Source: pm02a01

Q24 Hidalgo/Luna Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R24 Hidalgo/Luna Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Hidalgo/Luna for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 118 Hidalgo & Luna Counties SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lincoln County Capitan, Carrizozo, Corona, Glencoe, Hondo, Nogal, Ruidoso, Ruidoso Downs, San Patricio, Tinnie

Population estimate under age 20: 4,803 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 0.7% Median household income, 2007-2011: $41,667 Children under 18 living in poverty: 26% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.0%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Larry Wisecup CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 257-9217 Regional Manager: Cecilia Rosales Regional Office: (575) 373-6490

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Lincoln County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A25 Lincoln Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B25 Lincoln Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Lincoln County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 119 Lincoln County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lincoln County: Investigations & Allegations

C25 Lincoln Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D25 Lincoln Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Lincoln Region State 12 290 1,284 Substantiated 26.7% 27.7% 30.7% 33 757 2,893 Unsubstantiated 73.3% 72.3% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 1.1% 25.1% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 17 514 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 4.0 4.7 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Lincoln County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southwest) and the state of New Mexico; as This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Lincoln well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E25 Lincoln Investigation Dispositions F25 Lincoln Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 120 Lincoln County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lincoln County: Children in Care

G25 Lincoln Foster Care Entries & Exits H25 Lincoln Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Lincoln County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Lincoln County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I25 Lincoln Age Ranges of Children in Care J25 Lincoln Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Lincoln 2 10 11 3 0 26 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 3.6% 9.5% 10.9% 4.6% 0.0% 7.0% County % of State Total 0.5% 1.3% 1.8% 0.6% 0.0% 1.0% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Lincoln County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Lincoln County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 121 Lincoln County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lincoln County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K25 Lincoln “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L25 Lincoln Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Lincoln County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Lincoln Coun- a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each ty during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M25 Lincoln Children Adopted within 24 Months N25 Lincoln Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Lincoln County who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 122 Lincoln County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Lincoln County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O25 Lincoln Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P25 Lincoln Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Lincoln County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q25 Lincoln Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R25 Lincoln Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Lincoln County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 123 Lincoln County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Otero County Alamogordo, Bent, Boles Acres, Cloudcroft, La Luz, Mayhill, Mescalero, Piñon, Tularosa, Weed

Population estimate under age 20: 17,872 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 3.1% Median household income, 2007-2011: $37,217 Children under 18 living in poverty: 30% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 3.3%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Larry Wisecup CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 434-5950 Regional Manager: Cecilia Rosales Regional Office: (575) 373-6490

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Otero County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A26 Otero Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B26 Otero Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Otero County for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 124 Otero County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Otero County: Investigations & Allegations

C26 Otero Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D26 Otero Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Otero Region State 36 290 1,284 Substantiated 25.0% 27.7% 30.7% 108 757 2,893 Unsubstantiated 75.0% 72.3% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 3.4% 25.1% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 72 514 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 4.1 4.7 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Otero County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southwest) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Otero as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E26 Otero Investigation Dispositions F26 Otero Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 125 Otero County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Otero County: Children in Care

G26 Otero Foster Care Entries & Exits H26 Otero Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Otero County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Otero County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I26 Otero Age Ranges of Children in Care J26 Otero Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Otero 19 26 21 14 9 89 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 34.5% 24.8% 20.8% 21.5% 19.6% 23.9% County % of State Total 4.8% 3.3% 3.4% 2.9% 2.4% 3.3% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Otero County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Otero County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 126 Otero County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Otero County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K26 Otero “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L26 Otero Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Otero County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Otero County a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M26 Otero Children Adopted within 24 Months N26 Otero Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Otero County who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 127 Otero County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Otero County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O26 Otero Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P26 Otero Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Otero County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q26 Otero Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R26 Otero Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Otero County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 128 Otero County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sierra County Arrey, Caballo, Hillsboro, Truth or Consequences, Williamsburg, Winston

Population estimate under age 20: 2,027 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 0.4% Median household income, 2007-2011: $26,864 Children under 18 living in poverty: 26% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 0.5%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Tina Van Winkle CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 894-3414 Regional Manager: Cecilia Rosales Regional Office: (575) 373-6490

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Sierra County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A27 Sierra Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B27 Sierra Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Sierra County for the last 8 quarters. They include re- that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some ports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 129 Sierra County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sierra County: Investigations & Allegations

C27 Sierra Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D27 Sierra Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Sierra Region State 11 290 1,284 Substantiated 32.4% 27.7% 30.7% 23 757 2,893 Unsubstantiated 67.6% 72.3% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 0.8% 25.1% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 20 514 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 9.4 4.7 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Sierra County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southwest) and the state of New Mexico; as well This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Sierra as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. Source: County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E27 Sierra Investigation Dispositions F27 Sierra Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 130 Sierra County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sierra County: Children in Care

G27 Sierra Foster Care Entries & Exits H27 Sierra Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Sierra County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care to This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point-in Sierra County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and exit -time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I27 Sierra Age Ranges of Children in Care J27 Sierra Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Sierra 1 2 6 2 2 13 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 1.8% 1.9% 5.9% 3.1% 4.3% 3.5% County % of State Total 0.3% 0.3% 1.0% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Sierra County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the region This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in and statewide. Source: AFCARS Sierra County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 131 Sierra County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sierra County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K27 Sierra “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L27 Sierra Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Sierra County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It includes This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Sierra County a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for each during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or children quarter. Source: sm0904 entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M27 Sierra Children Adopted within 24 Months N27 Sierra Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Sierra County who have experienced no more than 2 placements of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses entry based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 132 Sierra County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Sierra County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O27 Sierra Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P27 Sierra Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Sierra County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q27 Sierra Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R27 Sierra Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Sierra County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 133 Sierra County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Socorro County Alamillo, Claunch, Escondida, La Joya, Lemitar, Luis Lopez, Magdalena, Polvadera, San Acadia, San Antonio, Socorro, Veguita

Population estimate under age 20: 5,289 Percent of the state’s total children under 20: 0.9% Median household income, 2007-2011: $30,729 Children under 18 living in poverty: 39% Percent of NM Protective Services’ total children in care as of September 30, 2016: 1.4%

CYFD-PS County Manager: Tina Van Winkle CYFD-PS County Office: (575) 835-2716 Regional Manager: Cecilia Rosales Regional Office: (575) 373-6490

*Based on US Census American Community Survey (2009-2013) Socorro County: Intakes & Investigations and NM Protective Services Data

A28 Socorro Reports of Abuse and Neglect: Trends B28 Socorro Investigation Outcomes: Trends

This line graph shows the number of reports that SCI (Statewide Central This line graph shows the number of reports accepted for investigation Intake) received in Socorro County for the last 8 quarters. They include that were substantiated vs. unsubstantiated for the last 8 quarters. Some reports that were screened out (not accepted) and screened in (accepted). investigations may involve more than one report of abuse and/or neglect. Source: sm01a10 Source: sm06a01c 360 County Profiles 134 Socorro County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Socorro County: Investigations & Allegations

C28 Socorro Investigation Outcomes: County & Region D28 Socorro Substantiated Allegations by Type

SFY 2017, 1st Quarter Socorro Region State 9 290 1,284 Substantiated 24.3% 27.7% 30.7% 28 757 2,893 Unsubstantiated 75.7% 72.3% 69.3% % of State Total Investigations 0.9% 25.1% 100.0%

# of Child Victims 16 514 2,261

Victim Rate per 1,000 3.2 4.7 3.9

This table shows investigation outcomes in Socorro County as they compare to the county’s entire region (Southwest) and the state of New Mexico; as This chart shows the types of allegations that were substantiated in Socorro well as rates of abuse and neglect per 1,000 children in the population. County during the quarter. Some investigations will involve more than one Source: sm06a01c type of allegation(s). Source: sm06a01c

E28 Socorro Investigation Dispositions F28 Socorro Repeat Maltreatment: Trends

This chart shows the percentages of children who were subject to maltreat- This graph shows the documented disposition of investigations completed ment within six months of a previous substantiated report of maltreatment. during the quarter. Dispositions are based on the safety threats, protective It includes a comparison of county, region, and state data. This is a strate- capacities, and risk of future maltreatment that are identified during the gic planning measure. The national standard for this measure is 5.4%. investigation. Source: sm06a01c Source: NCANDS

360 County Profiles 135 Socorro County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Socorro County: Children in Care

G28 Socorro Foster Care Entries & Exits H28 Socorro Race/Ethnicity of Children in Care

This chart illustrates the distribution of children in care by race/ethnicity in Socorro County. It compares race/ethnicity percentages of children in care This chart shows the number of entries into, and exits from, foster care in to those in the county population under age 20. The data is taken from a point Socorro County for the last eight quarters. Some children may enter and -in-time at the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS & Bureau of Business and exit care within the same quarter. Source: sm0904 Economic Research, Univ. of NM

I28 Socorro Age Ranges of Children in Care J28 Socorro Sibling Groups in Foster Care Point-In-Time Ending 9/30/2016 Age Range: 0 -1 2 -5 6 - 9 10 - 13 14 - 17 Total Socorro 2 14 8 7 6 37 Region 5 55 105 101 65 46 372 State 393 788 615 491 376 2663 County % of Region Total 3.6% 13.3% 7.9% 10.8% 13.0% 9.9% County % of State Total 0.5% 1.8% 1.3% 1.4% 1.6% 1.4% Age Range % of State Total 14.8% 29.6% 23.1% 18.4% 14.1% 100.0%

This table illustrates the ages of children in care in Socorro County as of the end of the quarter. It includes comparisons to children in care in the This chart shows the number of different sibling group sizes in foster care in region and statewide. Source: AFCARS Socorro County, as of the end of the quarter. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 136 Socorro County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Socorro County: Outcomes for Children in Care

K28 Socorro “Short Stays” in Foster Care: Trends L28 Socorro Permanency Goals of Children in Care

This graph shows the percentage of children entering foster care in Socor- ro County who leave care within 8 days, for the last eight quarters. It in- This graph shows the permanency goals of children in care in Socorro cludes a comparison to the statewide percentages of “short stayers” for County during the quarter. The data do not include “short-stayers,” or chil- each quarter. Source: sm0904 dren entering and exiting care within 8 days. Source: AFCARS

M28 Socorro Children Adopted within 24 Months N28 Socorro Placement Stability: Trends

This chart shows the percentage of children achieving permanency within This graph shows the percentage of children in care for less than 12 24 months, of the total number of children who exited care with an outcome months in Socorro County who have experienced no more than 2 place- of adoption. This is a strategic planning measure that uses an exit cohort ments since entering care. This is a strategic planning measure that uses based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS entry cohorts based on the federal fiscal year. Source: AFCARS

360 County Profiles 137 Socorro County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter

Socorro County: Providers & Case Worker Vacancy Rates

O28 Socorro Maltreatment in Foster Care: Trends P28 Socorro Foster Care Providers by Type: Trends

This chart shows the incidence of substantiated maltreatment of children in This chart shows trends in the number of foster care providers, by type foster care for the last eight quarters. This is a strategic planning measure (relative and non-relative) in Socorro County for the last 6 quarters. Each that is calculated using a cohort of all children who were in foster care quarter’s data are calculated using a point-in-time at the end of the quarter. during each federal fiscal quarter. Source: AFCARS & NCANDS Source: pm02a01

Q28 Socorro Provider Inquiries by Referral Source R28 Socorro Case Worker Vacancy Rates

This chart shows trends in vacancy rates for both investigation workers and This chart shows the number of accepted provider inquiries by source of permanency planning workers in Socorro County for the last eight quarters. referral for the quarter. It includes a comparison with statewide percentages. Vacancy rates were calculated based on filled positions vs. total full-time Note: Not all accepted inquiries go on to become licensed providers. Source: positions at a point in time at the end of each quarter. Source: PS Human pm04b07 Resources Data

360 County Profiles 138 Socorro County SFY 2017, 1st Quarter