RPS Admin Building Clerestory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RPS Admin Building Clerestory RPS Admin Building Clerestory OWNER: ROCKFORD PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT #205 IFB 20-43 SHEET INDEX 501 7TH STREET. ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS 61104 SHEET NO. SHEET NAME GENERAL G000 COVER SHEET G001 GENERAL NOTES AND PROJECT STANDARDS ARCHITECT: DEMOLITION BRADLEY AND BRADLEY ARCHITECTS, P.C. D100 GROUND FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN D101 4TH FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN A DIVISION OF TYSON & BILLY ARCHITECTS D102 5TH FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN (815) 229-8222 4000 Morsay Drive 4000 MORSAY DRIVE 61107 IL Rockford, STRUCTURAL (815) 229-8218 FAX: ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS 61107 S001 GENERAL NOTES p: (815) 229-8222 S104 FOURTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN S105 FIFTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN RONALD G. BILLY JR., LEED AP S400 ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS www.bradleyandbradley.com S501 DETAILS S502 DETAILS Bradley & Bradley Architects, & Bradley P.C. Bradley STRUCTURAL: ARCHITECTURAL A111 1ST FLOOR NEW WORK SELECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING A141 4TH FLOOR NEW WORK 606 14TH AVE. SW A151 5TH FLOOR NEW WORK A201 EXTERIOR EAST ELEVATION CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52404 A202 EXTERIOR SOUTHEAST ELEVATION A203 EXTERIOR SOUTHWEST ELEVATION p: (319) 365-1150 A204 EXTERIOR WINDOW ELEVATIONS A205 EXTERIOR WINDOW DETAILS A206 ESCALATOR DETAILS A311 WALL SECTIONS A312 WALL SECTIONS A313 WALL SECTIONS A503 ROOF DETAILS A901 3D VIEWS ARCHITECT BONDINGCO. OWNER CONTRACTOR RGB Appd. YCS Drn. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE I HAVE PREPARED, OR CAUSED TO BE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, 03/13/2020 THE ATTACHED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND STATE THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY 501 7TH STREET KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND TO THE EXTENT OF MY CONTRACTURAL OBLIGATION, THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIERS ACT (410 ILCS 25) ROCKFORD, IL 61104 AND THE ILLINOIS ACCESSIBILITY CODE (71 111. ADM. CODE 400) Date I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, COMPLY WITH ALL RPS Admin Building Clerestory APPLICABLE CODES. 19-12160 B LD G. I L A LY N J STE Project Number O GI R R R E E D . R REVISION DATE No. 001015480 Signed: Project Status Project STATE OF Architect/Engineer I L I S L N O A I T ILLINOIS REGISTRATION NO.: 001015480 R C C H I T E Exp. Date: 11/30/20 ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM REGISTRATION NO. 184003452 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED. REPRODUCTION OF THIS DRAWING, BY ANY PHOTOGRAPHIC, XEROGRAPHIC OR OTHER SIMILAR TECHNIQUE OR PROCESS, DURING THE BIDDING PERIOD OR FOR INCORPORATING THE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREON INTO A SHOP DRAWING, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED CONSENT Sheet No: OF TYSON AND BILLY ARCHITECTS, P.C.© 2020 BRADLEY AND BRADLEY ARCHITECTS, P.C. ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM REGISTRATION NO. 184003452 G000 COVER SHEET 3/26/2020 4:06:51 PM DIMENSION PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1. INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF METAL STUD OR CMU UNIT AND TO CENTERLINES OF COLUMNS, U.N.O. 2. REFER TO CODE PLANS FOR GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND UL DESIGNS OF RATED AND SMOKE PARTITIONS. 3. EXTEND PARTITIONS TO UNDERSIDE OF STRUCTURE/DECK, U.N.O. 4. SEE PLANS AND DETAIL PLANS FOR CHASE DIMENSIONS. @-AT JT - JOINT 5. FINAL WALL PREP REQUIREMENTS ARE BASED ON FINISH SHOWN IN ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE AND WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. A B - ANCHOR BOLT 6. REFER TO DETAIL PLANS AND SECTIONS FOR FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF INTERIOR PARTITIONS. ACOUS - ACOUSTIC KD - KNOCK DOWN 7. BACK-TO-BACK OUTLETS CANNOT OCCUPY SAME STUD CAVITY SPACE. IN ACOUSTICALLY TREATED WALLS, PROVIDE ACOUSTIC PUTTY PADS AROUND OUTLET BOXES. ACP - ACOUSTIC CEILING PANEL KO - KNOCK OUT (PANEL) 8. REFER TO SHEET A-631 FOR WALL PARTITION TYPES AND ASSEMBLIES. ADD'N - ADDITION 9. REFER TO SHEET A-631 FOR FIRE-RATED WALL ASSEMBLY NUMBERS. ADD'L - ADDITIONAL L-LONG 10. WHERE SEPARATION WALLS INTERSECT PERIMETER FURRING, PROVIDE FURRING STUDS AND SOUND INSULATION TO STRUCTURE ABOVE. EXTEND 24" MIN. ON EITHER SIDE OF SEPARATION WALL. ADJ - ADJACENT LAM - LAMINATE(D) 11. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS WITHIN THESE AREAS. ADJT - ADJUSTABLE LAV - LAVATORY AFF - ABOVE FINISH FLOOR LGT - LIGHT AHJ - AUTHORITY HAVING LH - LEFT HAND JURISDICTION LL - LIVE LOAD INTERIOR PARTITION LEGEND NOTES: AL - ALUMINUM LLH - LONG LEG HORIZONTAL 1. REFER TO SHEET A-631 FOR WALL PARTITION TYPES AND ASSEMBLIES. ALT - ALTERNATE LLV - LONG LEG VERTICAL 2. REFER TO CODE PLANS FOR GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND UL DESIGNS OF RATED AND SMOKE PARTITIONS. ANCH - ANCHOR LVL - LEVEL 3. METAL STUD & FURRED PARTITIONS INDICATED TO RECEIVE SOUND ATTENUATION BLANKET, INSTALL BLANKET FULL WIDTH OF STUD AND FULL HEIGHT OF WALL, OR TO UNDERSIDE OF STRUCTURE/DECK, U.N.O. IN FIRE-RATED PARTITIONS, USE ANOD - ANODIZED LVR - LOUVER SOUND ATTENUATION FIRE BLANKET. AP - ACCESS PANEL 4. SEE PLANS AND DETAIL PLANS FOR CHASE DIMENSIONS. WITHIN CHASE WALLS, USE 4" C-H STUDS MIN. APPROX - APPROXIMATE MAS'Y - MASONRY 5. INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR CMU UNIT, U.N.O. ASPH - ASPHALT MAT'L - MATERIAL 6. REFER TO DETAIL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION FOR LOCATIONS AND INFORMATION ON THE VARIOUS TYPES OF GYPSUM BOARD. AUTO - AUTOMATIC MAX - MAXIMUM 7. FINAL WALL PREP REQUIREMENTS BASED ON FINISH SHOWN IN THE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE AND WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. AVE - AVERAGE MB - MACHINE BOLT 8. REFER TO DETAIL PLANS AND SECTIONS FOR FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF INTERIOR PARTITIONS. MECH - MECHANICAL 9. REFER TO FINISH DRAWINGS AND SCHEDULES FOR WALL MATERIAL AND FINISHES. BD - BOARD MED - MEDIUM BITUM - BITUMINOUS / BITUMASTIC MEZZ - MEZZANINE BLDG - BUILDING MFR - MANUFACTURER FINISH PLAN GENERAL NOTES: PLAN / DETAIL SIM BLK'G - BLOCKING (WOOD) MH - MAN HOLE 1. FINISH INDICATES ENTIRE SURFACE, U.N.O. REF. 1 CALLOUT BRG - BEARING MIN - MINIMUM 2. FINISH ON SOFFITS INDICATES ENTIRE FACE AND BOTTOM, U.N.O. A101 BRK - BRICK MISC - MISCELLANEOUS 3. CEILINGS AND SOFFITS TO BE P1, U.N.O. AREA TO BE (815) 229-8222 BRK PV - BRICK PAVERS MO - MASONRY OPENING 4000 Morsay Drive 4. REFER TO DRAWING XXXX FOR TRANSITION DETAILS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS, CORNER GUARD DETAILS, AND WALL BASE DETAILS. 61107 IL Rockford, ENLARGED SHEET REF. BRKT - BRACKET MOD - MODULAR (815) 229-8218 FAX: 5. HOLLOW METAL FRAMES TO BE <PAINT FINISH>. BSMT - BASEMENT MR - MOISTURE RESISTANT 6. CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED <PAINT FINISH>), U.N.O. BT STL PL - BENT STEEL PLATE MSB - MOP SERVICE BASIN (SINK) 7. SCORED TILES AROUND DRAIN AREAS FOR SLOPE. SECTION REF. SIM BUILDING/WALL BTM - BOTTOM MT(D) - MOUNT(ED) 1 SECTION BTW'N - BETWEEN MTL - METAL A101 BUR - BUILT UP ROOF(ING) SHEET REF. NIC - NOT IN CONTRACT www.bradleyandbradley.com ROOF PLANS GENERAL NOTES: CAB - CABINET NO - NUMBER 1. REFER TO DEMOLITION DRAWINGS FOR DEMOLITION AND SELECTIVE DEMOLITION OF ROOF, ROOFING SYSTEM, AND ROOF EDGE ASSEMBLY. CG - CORNER GUARD NOM - NOMINAL Architects, & Bradley P.C. Bradley 2. TAPERED INSULATION (TAPERED, CRICKETS, SADDLES) TO BE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO ROOF DRAINS OR SCUPPERS, AS INDICATED. CIPC - CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE NTS - NOT TO SCALE 3. COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLOPED STRUCTURE. DETAIL REF. SIM 1 DETAIL SECTION CJ - CONSTRUCTION/ 4. SHOP DRAWINGOF TAPERED INSULATION SHALL ACCOUNT FOR CAMBER IN STRUCTURE TO INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. CONTRACTION JOINT OA - OVERALL 5. AT PENETRATIONS, PROVIDE CRICKETS AS REQUIRED FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. A101 CLG - CEILING OC - ON CENTER SHEET REF. 6. COORDINATE ROOF AND OVERFLOW DRAIN LOCATIONS WITH STRUCUTRAL ELEMENTS, TO AVOID LOCATING ROOF AND OVERFLOW DRAINS OVER TOP OF STEEL BEAMS AND JOISTS. CLR - CLEAR OD - OUTSIDE DIAMETER 7. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATION OF OVERFLOW SCUPPERS AND OUTFLOWS. CMT - CERAMIC MOSAIC TILE OF - OUTSIDE FACE 8. PROVIDE 24"W. x 48"L. PRECAST CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS ON GRADE BELOW SCUPPERS AND OUTFLOWS THAT FLOW WATER ONTO. CMU - CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT OH - OVER HEAD 9. PROVIDE 24”W. x 48”L. STAINLESS STEL SPLASHPAN ON ROOF BELOW SCUPPERS AND OUTFLOWS THAT FLOW WATER ONTO ROOFS BELOW. ELEVATION REF. 1 CO - CLEAN OUT OPNG - OPENING 10. ROOF WALKWAY PADS SHALL BE SPACED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. INTERIOR ELEVATION COL - COLUMN OPP - OPPOSITE 11. AT ROOF LADDERS, TOP AND BOTTOM, PROVIDE 4' x 4' ROOF WALKWAY PADS. COMB - COMBINATION OPP HD - OPPOSITE HAND A411 12. ROOF FLASHING DETAILS ARE GENERIC AND WILL NEED TO BE FINALIZED DURING SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS BASED ON THE ROOFING MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD DETAILS. SHEET REF. COMP - COMPRESSIBLE OVHD - OVERHEAD COMPT'D - COMPACTED CEILING PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1 CONC - CONCRETE PAV'T - PAVEMENT 1. CONTROL JOINTS SHOWN IN GYP BD SOFFIT SHALL CONTINUE ON VERTICAL SURFACE OF SAME SOFFIT. SPACE CONTROL JOINTS NO MORE THAN 25'-0" O.C. ARCHITECT TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. COND - CONDITION PC - PIECE 2. SEE ENLARGED CEILING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL SOFFIT DIMENSIONS AND CONTROL JOINT LOCATIONS. CONT - CONTINUOUS PCC - PRECAST CONCRETE EXTERIOR ELEVATION CONTR - CONTRACTOR PERI - PERIMETER 3. ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND TECHNOLOGY FIXTURES AND DEVICES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE AND TO COORDINATE PLACEMENT. REFER TO ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR INFORMATION REGARDING TYPE AND OTHER FIXTURE AND DEVICE A201 INFORMATION. CORR - CORRUGATED PERM - PERMANENT 4. ESTABLISH PRE-INSTALLATION MEETING WITH ARCHITECT TO REVIEW STARTING POINT OF CEILING GRID IN EACH AREA/ROOM. CPT - CARPET PL - PLATE 5. SUBMIT A REFLECTED CEILING PLAN COORDINATION DRAWING TO ARCHITECT AFTER COORDINATING LAYOUT WITH OTHER TRADES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CEILING WORK. CR - COLD ROLLED PLAM - PLASTIC LAMINATE CRS - COURSE(ING) PLB'G - PLUMBING 6. GYPSUM CEILING TO BE PAINTED. Room CT - CERAMIC TILE PLYWD - PLYWOOD 7. EXPOSED STRUCTURE, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS (EXCEPT SPRINKLER HEADS) ARE TO BE PAINTED, U.N.O. Name ROOM TAG 8. SPRINKLE HEADS ARE NOT SHOWN. LOCATE SPRINKLER HEADS IN THE CENTER OF CEILING PANELS. CTR - COUNTER PSF - POUNDS PER SQUARE 9. CEILING HEIGHTS SHOWN ON REFLECTED CEILING PLANS ARE FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR OF PLAN SHOWN. ROOM NUMBER 101 CTS - CENTER(S) FOOT 10.
Recommended publications
  • Truss Terminology
    TRUSS TERMINOLOGY BEARING WIDTH The width dimension of the member OVERHANG The extension of the top chord beyond the providing support for the truss (usually 3 1/2” or 5 1/2”). heel joint. Bearing must occur at a truss joint location. PANEL The chord segment between two adjacent joints. CANTILEVER That structural portion of a truss which extends PANEL POINT The point of intersection of a chord with the beyond the support. The cantilever dimension is measured web or webs. from the outside face of the support to the heel joint. Note that the cantilever is different from the overhang. PEAK Highest point on a truss where the sloped top chords meet. CAMBER An upward vertical displacement built into a truss bottom chord to compensate for defl ection due to dead load. PLATE Either horizontal 2x member at the top of a stud wall offering bearing for trusses or a shortened form of connector CHORDS The outer members of a truss that defi ne the plate, depending on usage of the word. envelope or shape. PLUMB CUT Top chord cut to provide for vertical (plumb) TOP CHORD An inclined or horizontal member that establishes installation of fascia. the upper edge of a truss. This member is subjected to compressive and bending stresses. SCARF CUT For pitched trusses only – the sloping cut of upper portion of the bottom chord at the heel joint. BOTTOM CHORD The horizontal (and inclined, ie. scissor trusses) member defi ning the lower edge of a truss, carrying SLOPE (PITCH) The units of horizontal run, in one unit of ceiling loads where applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Pevsner's Architectural Glossary
    Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 1 PEVSNER’S ARCHITECTURAL GLOSSARY Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 2 Nikolaus and Lola Pevsner, Hampton Court, in the gardens by Wren's east front, probably c. Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 3 PEVSNER’S ARCHITECTURAL GLOSSARY Yale University Press New Haven and London Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 4 Temple Street, New Haven Bedford Square, London www.pevsner.co.uk www.lookingatbuildings.org.uk www.yalebooks.co.uk www.yalebooks.com for Published by Yale University Press Copyright © Yale University, Printed by T.J. International, Padstow Set in Monotype Plantin All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections and of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 5 CONTENTS GLOSSARY Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 6 FOREWORD The first volumes of Nikolaus Pevsner’s Buildings of England series appeared in .The intention was to make available, county by county, a comprehensive guide to the notable architecture of every period from prehistory to the present day. Building types, details and other features that would not necessarily be familiar to the general reader were explained in a compact glossary, which in the first editions extended to some terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Put the Pedal to the Metal CONTINUING EDUCATION
    2 EDUCATIONAL-ADVERTISEMENT Photo courtesy of Alucobond/Connor Group/Daniel Lunghi Photography CONTINUING EDUCATION CONTINUING Put the Pedal to the Metal CONTINUING EDUCATION Metal roofing and wall systems’ longevity, recyclability, 1 AIA LU/HSW and compatibility with retrofits and rooftop solar Learning Objectives After reading this article, you should be able to: technology present an impressive sustainable scorecard 1. Define the primary advantages that metal and metal roofs offer in delivering a long- Sponsored by Metal Construction Association lasting, energy-efficient building enclosure. 2. Identify the predominant aspects of metal one of the three little pigs built a account of their sustainable attributes. “Many roofing systems that make them highly house out of metal, but it would have metal products in the construction industry compatible with rooftop solar technologies N been a good way to keep away the big, are manufactured with recycled materials,” he and life-cycle benefits. bad wolf. explains. Notably, “it’s an excellent reuse or 3. List key integrated building systems and Sturdy, strong, and sustainable metal walls repurposing of materials that might previously strategies for maximizing energy and and roof panels are known for their durable have ended up in a landfill.” performance savings with metal roofing and green features. Metal is almost unbeatable One-hundred percent recyclable, metal retrofits. among building materials for its recyclable walls and roofs can also be manufactured 4. Discuss case studies illustrating the sustainability of metal roofing and wall properties, and metal walls and roofs contrib- with 40 percent recycled steel. This figure is systems. ute to reduced energy consumption, as their especially impressive in light of the estimated well-known cool roofing properties reflect heat 11 million tons of asphalt shingles that end To receive AIA credit, you are required to read energy and absorb less heat, keeping buildings up in landfills.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Bracing Commentary
    Commentary for Permanent Bracing of Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses John E. Meeks, P.E., Original Author Reviewed by the Engineering Review Committee of the Wood Truss Council of America and the Technical Advisory Committee Wood Truss Council of America of the Truss Plate Institute One WTCA Center 6425 Normandy Lane • Madison, WI 53719-1133 608/274-4849 • 608/274-3329 (fax) www.woodtruss.com • [email protected] Copyright © 1999 Wood Truss Council of America COMMENTARY FOR PERMANENT BRACING OF METAL PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 GENERAL PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................................. 2 Roof or Floor Loads ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Architect and/or Engineer of Record - Building Designer .................................................................................... 3 Approval of Truss Submittals
    [Show full text]
  • Description 1628-1633 Planter Gothic Cathedral. Spire. Chancel and Chapter House Added. 'Rising up Powerfully Above the Steps
    Foyle Civic Trust St Columb’s Cathedral Living City Project 2 Map Reference C1 Address St Columb’s Cathedral Name St Columb’s Cathedral Map Reference C1 Plot Number 1 Listed Building yes Reference HB01/19/001 Grade A Conservation Area yes Reference historic city Building at Risk no Reference n/a Date of Construction 1628-1633 Original Use cathedral Present Use cathedral Description 1628-1633 Planter Gothic Cathedral. Spire. Chancel and Chapter House added. ‘Rising up powerfully above the steps of St Columb’s Court where the cathedral comes close to the walls of the court house, it can be seen best as a whole from SW, where its churchyard runs unimpeded by buildings up to the southernmost stretch of the city walls. For all the different dates the materials are the same: rubble schist walls with sandstone trim. The tower and steeple are typical of their date, though more lavish in scale than usual. Four-stage tower with thin clasping buttresses, regular string courses, and octagonal pinnacles that seem to be an early c19 attempt to catch the style of the original c17 church. The spire too has an odd feature in the roll mouldings of the arrises. Beyond the green gabled projections of Drew’s chapter house [Thomas Drew] and vestry – the latter on the site of the original s porch [this statement appears not to be accurate] – the s aisle of 1628 takes over, with late Gothic windows and curious quasi-classical buttresses. The windows are in groups of four lights, cusped, and set within a shallow segmental arch with a segmental hood mould above.
    [Show full text]
  • National Best Practices Manual for Building High Performance Schools
    DAYLIGHTING AND WINDOWS Daylighting forms the cornerstone of resource efficient, high performance design for schools. Affecting individuals on both conscious and subconscious levels, it provides light to see the work environment, a natural rhythm that determines the cycles of days and seasons, and biological stimulation for hormones that regulate body systems and moods. In addition, it offers opportunities for natural ventilation and, if properly integrated with the electric lighting system, can provide tremendous energy savings. The Gentle, diffuse daylight permeates a classroom with both advantages of daylighting translate to higher sidelight and toplight. Note that all surfaces are painted performance in schools. Research has shown that white to distribute light more efficiently and reduce contrast glare. NREL/PIX 11392 children achieve significantly higher test scores in classrooms that are daylit than in those that are not,1 making daylighting one of the best building-related investments for the learning environment. This chapter provides an overview of daylighting and fenestration design. It also presents eight daylighting guidelines for specific sidelighting and toplighting schemes. View Windows (Guideline DL1) High Sidelighting—Clerestory (Guideline DL2) High Sidelighting—Clerestory with Light Shelf or Louvers (Guideline DL3) Classroom Daylighting—Wall Wash Toplighting (Guideline DL4) Central Toplighting (Guideline DL5) Patterned Toplighting (Guideline DL6) Linear Toplighting (Guideline DL7) Tubular Skylights (Guideline DL8) To fully daylight most spaces, the guidelines should be combined with each other or repeated as a pattern across the space. For example, Wall Wash Toplighting (Guideline DL4) on an interior wall could be combined with High Clerestory Sidelighting (Guideline DL2) and View Windows (Guideline DL1) on an 1 Heschong Mahone Group, “Daylighting in Schools—An Investigation into the Relationship between Daylighting and Human Performance,” prepared for Pacific Gas & Electric Company and funded by California utility customers, 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity Analysis of Skylight and Clerestory Design on Energy and Daylight Performance of a Retail Building
    2018 Building Performance Analysis Conference and SimBuild co-organized by ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA Chicago, IL September 26-28, 2018 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF SKYLIGHT AND CLERESTORY DESIGN ON ENERGY AND DAYLIGHT PERFORMANCE OF A RETAIL BUILDING Yuan Fang1, Soolyeon Cho2 1Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 2North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC eye functioning problems (Edwards & Torcellini, 2002). ABSTRACT The wavelength of light also influences many other Daylight and energy performance are essential for health issues, such as nervous system, circadian rhythms, sustainable building design. Skylights and clerestories and endocrine system problems (Edwards & Torcellini, are effective strategies for providing sufficient daylight 2002). while reducing building energy requirement. To identify The advantages of daylighting designs in different the most influential variables of the skylight and building types have been documented in various studies. clerestory design, a parametric design model of a retail Specifically, it is found that proper daylight design in building is developed and 1000 design options are retail buildings can increase sales (Heschong et al., randomly selected. Integrated daylight and energy 2002), improve customer satisfaction, and promote simulations are performed for each option to evaluate the productivity (Boyce et al., 2003). Skylight is an effective lighting and thermal loads simultaneously. The lighting and energy saving method, however, it is still performance indices for daylighting and energy not widely applied in the industry. Only approximately performance evaluation are Useful Daylight Illuminance 2–5% of commercial building floor space has sufficient (UDI) and Energy Use Intensity (EUI). Then, a skylight area (Lawrence & Roth, 2008). Therefore, it is sensitivity analysis is used to rank building design necessary to advise designers and practitioners on how variables according to their contribution to the variance skylight strategies impact the building’s energy loads of UDI and EUI.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long and Short of Wood Roof Systems
    9/30/2014 The Long and Short of Wood Roof Systems Presented by Scott Breneman, PhD, PE, SE October 1, 2014 Photo Al Karevy/Bensonwood “The Wood Products Council” is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems (AIA/CES). Credit(s) earned on completion of this program will be reported to AIA/CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request. This program is registered with AIA/CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation. 1 9/30/2014 Course Description This course is an overview of the many framing systems commonly used in buildings in the United States for a variety of span lengths. The presentation will review the possible wood structural framing systems including rafters, metal plated wood trusses, engineered wood products and hybrid roof systems. Also covered will be how these components can be combined to create efficient and versatile roof framing systems. All of these concepts will be reinforced through the presentation of real example projects with details on the framing system used to achieve the project goals. Learning Objectives At the end of this program: • Participants
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine Roof Trusses Have Been Specified for Educational Buildings for a Half Century, but They Were Often Concealed by Suspended Or Hanging Ceilings in the Past
    GracefulGracefulGraceful LLLaminatedaminatedaminated TTTimbersimbersimbers EnhanceEnhanceEnhance LibraryLibraryLibraryCopyright InteriorsInteriorsInteriors © STRUCTURE Laminated timbermagazine roof trusses have been specified for educational buildings for a half century, but they were often concealed by suspended or hanging ceilings in the past. Today, many architects are deliberately leaving the big trusses exposed because of their warmth and aesthetic appeal. For new libraries, many designs are incorporating these concepts to provide a warmer environment for study, reading and research. Architects and engineers have a choice of many different materials for roof systems in institutional and commercial buildings. Exposed timber beams and trusses are often specified because of wood's strength, competitive cost, and warm appearance. Four new libraries have been designed with laminated wood beams and laminated roof decking for their aesthetic appeal, and to avoid the expense of suspending or hanging ceilings to cover structural framework. The furring, sheathing and finishing often required with steel or other structural materials is eliminated, which means faster construction at lower cost with wood. And unlike steel, concrete or other materials that deplete natural resources, wood is renewable with 6 million trees planted each day in the U.S. Today's light, graceful library structures are a far cry from the past when many libraries were built like fortresses with heavy concrete columns and dark, gloomy interiors. 1 of 6 STRUCTURE • March 2003 “People come to libraries seeking knowledge, entertainment and stimulation. Upon entering the recently completed Beaverton City Library in Beaverton, Oregon, it becomes immediately apparent that all of these things and much more are available inside. Funded through a local voter- approved bond measure, the new facility replaced the city’s old library which had been located in an overly cramped converted 20,000 square foot supermarket.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Patterns
    Architectural Patterns Architectural Patterns Roanoke’s houses and their respective patterns reflect the periods of development and the changing tastes and livelihoods of the residents who built them. The following section helps homeowners and builders recognize Roanoke’s residential architecture patterns by identifying the key components of each form. Character-defining features of each pattern are examined with attention to massing, roof forms, wall cladding, porches, doors, and windows. Architectural details are illustrated with graphics and photographs of Roanoke houses. With a little practice, anyone can recognize these elements that typify the houses and neighborhoods of Roanoke. The architectural patterns discussed in the Pattern Book are not exclusive to Roanoke. They are found in cities across the United States. An ability to recognize the repeating architectural patterns that link a house to its neighborhood, and its place in the city’s development, enables people to appreciate a house’s history and architectural character, and make informed decisions regarding renovation, additions and new construction in a specific neighborhood. For example, the Downtown urban core is rich in Queen Anne and Colonial Revival, while the later Traditional neighborhoods feature Tudor Revival, Bungalow, and Foursquare houses. The Ranch houses and continuing styles of Colonial Revival reflect the Post-World II Suburban neighborhoods. The matrix on the following page will help you identify which architectural patterns are typically found in each neighborhood classification. (To determine your neighborhood’s classification, please refer to Neighborhood Patterns.) Stylistic Mixtures In a region like the Roanoke Valley, stylistic categories can become blurred. While many houses in Roanoke have been built in distinct, recognizable architectural styles, other houses have multiple characteristics, and do not fit neatly into one category.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Making and Using Demonstration Models for Heliodons
    A Guide for Making and Using Demonstration Models for Heliodons By Norbert Lechner, Prof. Emeritus and Architect [email protected] INTRODUCTION Heliodons are powerful tools for creating solar responsive designs. They can be used to teach solar geometry, to teach solar strategies, to analyze designs, to create designs, and for presentations where the effectiveness of solar designs can be objectively demonstrated. The purpose of this guide is to help in the production and use of models for teaching solar strategies such as building orientation, building form, window placement and shape, shading devices, solar access, tree placement, and sundial design. In the following discussion, each model will be described first in regard to its construction (Part A) and then how it can be used to demonstrate solar strategies (Part B). PART A: CONSTRUCTION OF MODELS 1. The Base Building Model The base building model will be used to demonstrate various shading and passive solar strategies. Figure 1 shows the base model along with various attachments. The drawings in Appendix A show recommended dimensions which make the base model small enough so that heliodon distortions are minimized yet large enough so that a group of about 15 people can easily see the model demonstrated on the heliodon. Figure 1 2. The Adjustable Overhang Roof Attachment Figure 2 shows the “adjustable overhang roof attachment” on the base model. The construction drawings are shown in Appendix B, and Appendix C shows the two overhang inserts that slide easily back and forth in the roof channels. Also make sure that the projections on the underside of the roof attachment fit easily into the top of the base model for stability.
    [Show full text]
  • A Day in the Loft
    A Day in the Loft Well maybe not every one’s idea of fun. Climbing up and down narrow spiral staircases, along dark, windowless passages and brushing through dusty old cobwebs, plus maybe some new and occupied ones. But for me the prospect of exploring the roof spaces of Tewkesbury Abbey was thrilling. When the day came my guide, John, and I were suitably wrapped up. The Abbey was warm but we knew the roof spaces would not be. It was late November and a wet and chilly day. On our exploration there would be small doors giving access to the outside world and tantalising glimpses of surrounding countryside and the exterior surfaces of the roofs but with this weather the walkways would be far too slippery to venture out. Some of the access corridors would be quite narrow so thick coats were not going to help but still we needed to keep warm! One of the surprises for a first time visitor, like me, is to see the high-tech electronics driving the wonderful LED lighting system in the Abbey. Installed in 2014, with a new sound system and both largely paid for by the Friends of Tewkesbury Abbey, this lighting we’ve left behind makes the spaces we were to spend the next Fig.1 The north triforium hours in seem even darker. Many of the spiral staircases and narrow passages are part of the original Norman Abbey and have not changed much over the last 900 years. The roof spaces on the other hand have seen fundamental changes.
    [Show full text]