DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft EIR Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft EIR Appendices EIR TECHNICAL APPENDICES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE OCEANO DUNES DISTRICT February 2020 California Department of Parks and Recreation Oceano Dunes District Habitat Conservation Plan Draft EIR Technical Appendices SCH No. 2018011012 February 2020 Prepared for: California Department of Parks and Recreation Oceano Dunes District 340 James Way, Ste. 270 Pismo Beach, CA 93449 (805) 773-7170 www.ohv.parks.ca.gov Prepared by: MIG, Inc. 2055 Junction Avenue, Suite 205 San Jose, CA 95131 (650) 327-0429 www.migcom.com Page intentionally left blank. Introduction Page 1 INTRODUCTION This document is the Technical Appendices volume of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Oceano Dunes District Habitat Conservation Plan. This volume presents the following appendices: Appendix A. Scoping Report Appendix B. HCP Avoidance and Minimization Measures Appendix C. Special-Status Species in HCP Area Appendix D. Biological Effects of Existing Covered Activities Appendix E. Native American Communications Oceano Dunes District Habitat Conservation Plan Draft EIR California Department of Parks and Recreation February 2020 Page intentionally left blank. Oceano Dunes District Habitat Conservation Plan EIR Appendix A: Scoping Report This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A: Scoping Report Page A-1 Oceano Dunes District Habitat Conservation Plan EIR Scoping Report August 2018 Prepared for: California Department of Parks and Recreation Oceano Dunes District 340 James Way, Ste. 270 Pismo Beach, CA 93449 (805) 773-7170 Prepared by: MIG, Inc. 2635 N. First Street, Suite 149 San Jose, CA 95134 (650) 327-0429 www.migcom.com Appendix A: Scoping Report Page A-2 Oceano Dunes District Habitat Conservation Plan EIR Scoping Report INTRODUCTION This scoping report summarizes the public scoping meeting and comments received for the environmental document being prepared in connection with California Department of Parks and Recreation’s (CDPR) application for an incidental take permit, for Pismo State Beach and Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area (SVRA), (ITP) authorized under Sections 10(a)(1)(A) and 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA). The environmental document will consider potential impacts of implementing CDPR’s Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and issuance of an incidental take permit by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The report is organized in the following sections: Introduction Background Action and Environmental Document Scoping Process Comments Received Summary of Scoping Comments Attachment 1: Notices and Meeting Advertisements o Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting o USFWS News Release seeking public input on HCP o Notice of Intent Attachment 2: Scoping Meeting Presentation Attachment 3: Scoping Meeting Attendance Record Attachment 4: Scoping Meeting Oral Comments and Questions Attachment 5: Scoping Letters o Hardcopy Letters o Emails o Form emails BACKGROUND CDPR is in the process of developing a conservation strategy for various species located at Pismo State Beach and Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area (SVRA), for which the California Department of Parks and Recreation (CDPR) has responsibility and authority. Management and operation of the two areas may negatively affect western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus), California least tern (Sternula antillarum browni), California red- legged frog (Rana draytonii), and tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi), as well as six listed plant species. Therefore, CDPR has prepared a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) as part of its application for an incidental take permit (ITP) authorized under Sections 10(a)(1)(A) and 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA). The HCP to be prepared by CDPR in support of the permit applications will describe the impacts of take on proposed covered species, and it will propose a conservation strategy to minimize and mitigate those impacts on each covered species to the maximum extent practicable. Oceano Dunes Habitat Conservation Plan EIR – August 2018 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Appendix A: Scoping Report Page A-3 ACTION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT CDPR has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Oceano Dunes District HCP pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). USFWS is preparing an environmental review of the Draft HCP pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in a separate document. Both the Draft EIR and the USFWS NEPA document will have distinct public review periods and opportunities to provide comment on the respective environmental review document and the Draft HCP. SCOPING PROCESS CDPR published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the EIR on January 11, 2018 to invite comment on the scope and content of the environmental review of the Oceano Dunes District HCP; the comment period closed on March 12, 2018. Simultaneously, the USFWS published a Notice of Intent in the Federal Register and a News Release to announce preparation of a NEPA environmental review of the HCP and to invite public comment. Both notices announced a joint public scoping meeting on February 7, 2018 for the purpose of inviting public comments on the project. Public notice of the scoping period and public meeting was distributed to state agencies through the State Clearinghouse, County Clerk offices of adjacent counties, local community agencies, adjacent property residents, homeowner and neighborhood associations, and interested organizations and individuals who have requested notices from CDPR (Attachment 1). Notice was also published in a newspaper of local circulation. The objective of the scoping meeting was to solicit comments to assist the preparation of the environmental document and scope of the Habitat Conservation Plan. Commentors were asked to identify important issues and alternatives related to the proposed action to ensure the full range of issues related to the permit requests is identified. Members of the public were greeted on arrival and asked to sign the attendance record form listing their name, address, and affiliation. The meeting was held with an open house format beginning with introductions, followed by a slide show presentation by Ronnie Glick, Senior Environmental Scientist, California State Parks (Attachment 2) and was followed by a general question and answer period. The public was then invited to submit verbal comments. Comment cards and mailing information were also provided for written comments. The notice and presentation stated that written comments would be accepted through March 12, 2018. Representatives from the Oceano Dunes District of CDPR, USFWS, and MIG consultants attended and conducted the scoping meeting. Twenty members of the public signed the attendance list (Attachment 3) for the meeting. COMMENTS RECEIVED A total of 20 oral comments were received at the scoping meeting (Attachment 4). Twelve distinct comment letters, emails or comment cards were received in response to the NOP and NOI and one form letter email was submitted by 2,053 individuals. Some of the form letters contained additional unique comments as recorded with the form letter. Scoping comments were submitted by private individuals, public agencies, and private conservation groups (Attachment 5). Oceano Dunes Habitat Conservation Plan EIR – August 2018 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Appendix A: Scoping Report Page A-4 SUMMARY OF SCOPING COMMENTS Some of the comments related to the HCP rather than the environmental document, and some comments expressed support or opposition to certain aspects of the proposed HCP. Some comments pertained only to the federal agency environmental review under NEPA. Only those comments relating to the scope of the environmental analysis are presented below. The comments focused on air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, water quality/hydrology, recreation opportunity, the alternatives analysis, and cumulative impacts. Document Type & Review Process. Specify whether EIR will be used as programmatic “tiering” document or provide project-level review, prepare a full EIS not an EA, and that a NCCP is needed for CLTE since it is a Fully Protected Species. General Comments Applying to Entire Document. Base environmental review on best available science and survey data following established protocols. (see methodology section for each impact analysis chapter) Project Description- Proposed Action. Identify purpose and need and rationale for proposed action. HCP and CEQA/NEPA documents must clearly identify enforcement provisions. Air Quality. Address general impacts of motorized recreation on air quality, dust, and particulates. For air quality analysis, quantify emissions, identify emissions sources, and include construction emissions mitigation including fugitive dust source controls, stationary equipment source controls, and administrative controls. Demonstrate project emissions of air basin pollutants in nonattainment or maintenance status are accounted for in the State Implementation Plan. Greenhouse Gas (GHG). Address general impacts of motorized recreation on GHG emissions. Biological Resources. Address general impacts of motorized recreation on loss of surface soils and vegetation and trash. Include direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to all wildlife and habitat, and measures to avoid impacts. Discuss HCP’s consistency with other HCPs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Status of California Monarchs
    The Legal Status of Monarch Butterflies in California International Environmental Law Project 2012 IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status The International Environmental Law Project (IELP) is a legal clinic at Lewis & Clark Law School that works to develop, implement, and enforce international environmental law. It works on a range of issues, including wildlife conservation, climate change, and issues relating to trade and the environment. This report was written by the following people from the Lewis & Clark Law School: Jennifer Amiott, Mikio Hisamatsu, Erica Lyman, Steve Moe, Toby McCartt, Jen Smith, Emily Stein, and Chris Wold. Biological information was reviewed by the following individuals from The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation: Carly Voight, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Hoffman Black. This report was funded by the Monarch Joint Venture and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. For more information, contact: Chris Wold Associate Professor of Law & Director International Environmental Law Project Lewis & Clark Law School 10015 SW Terwilliger Blvd Portland, OR 97219 USA TEL +1-503-768-6734 FX +1-503-768-6671 E-mail: [email protected] Web: law.lclark.edu/org/ielp Copyright © 2012 International Environmental Law Project and the Xerces Society Photo of overwintering monarchs (Danaus plexippus) clustering on a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) on front cover by Carly Voight, The Xerces Society. IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................v I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 II. Regulatory Authority of the California Department of Fish and Game ..............................5 III. Protection for Monarchs in California State Parks and on Other State Lands .....................6 A. Management of California State Parks ....................................................................6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Pacific Coast Breeding Window Survey
    2011 Summer Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2005-2010 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. Total Adults 2011 Adult Breakdown REGION SITE OWNER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 male fem. sex? Date Primary Observer(s) Grays Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Warren Michaelis Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Scott Harris Damon Point/Oyhut S. Parks, D. Nat R. F & W 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-Jun Cyndie Sundstrom County Total 50 0 00 0 0 00 0 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 23 25 22 12 16 18 22 8 13 1 23-May Cyndie Sundstrom, Scott Harris, Warren Michaelis Graveyard Shoalwater Indian Tribe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18-May Cyndie Sundstrom, Scott Harris, Steve Spencer Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 9 42 28 29 26 20 12 5 6 1 24-May W. Ritchie, C. Sundstrom, S. Pearson, W. Michaelis, S. Harris, M. Fernandez South Long Beach Private 00000 County Total 32 67 50 42 42 38 34 13 19 2 Washington Total 37 67 50 42 42 38 34 13 19 2 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 0 0 0 0 00 0 23-May Kathy Roberts, Andrea Barry Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 27-May Dave Nuzum County Total 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23-May Herman Biederbeck Bayocean Spit ACOE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Charlie Bruce, Michelle Schuiteman Netarts Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-Jun Liz Kelly, Fran Recht Sand Lake Spit (S) USFS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Jeff Everett Nestucca Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 County Total 00 0 00 0 0 00
    [Show full text]
  • Want to Skip Black Friday Chaos? You Can Get Free Passes to These State Parks Instead
    Want to skip Black Friday chaos? You can get free passes to these state parks instead By Kalin Kipling | NOV 5, 2017 California State Parks and Save the Redwoods have joined together to offer an alternative to the Black Friday shopping madness. On Nov. 24, more than 40 redwood state parks will take part in the 2017 Redwoods Friday program, according to Save the Redwoods League. There are thousands of free vehicle day‐use passes up for grabs, but they are first come, first served. (Other park fees, such as camping or boat launch fees, are not included.) The free passes went on sale Nov. 1, and some parks are already sold out. Here is a list of parks that are participating, showing which were sold out as of 1 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 5: Admiral William Standley State Recreation Area SOLD OUT Andrew Molera State Park SOLD OUT Armstrong Redwoods State Natural Reserve SOLD OUT Austin Creek State Recreation Area Benbow State Recreation Area Big Basin Redwoods State Park SOLD OUT Bothe‐Napa Valley State Park Butano State Park Calaveras Big Trees State Park Castle Rock State Park SOLD OUT Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park Fort Humboldt State Historic Park Fort Ross State Historic Park Garrapata State Park Grizzly Creek Redwoods State Park Harry A. Merlo State Recreation Area Hendy Woods State Park Henry Cowell Redwoods State Park Humboldt Lagoons State Park Humboldt Redwoods State Park Jack London State Historic Park Jedediah Smith Redwoods State Park John B. Dewitt Redwoods State Natural Reserve Jug Handle State Natural Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • Butano State Park Preliminary General Plan and Draft EIR March 2008
    2 E XISTING C ONDITIONS Photo on reverse: View from Butano ridge Butano State Park Preliminary General Plan and Draft EIR March 2008 C HAPTER 2: E XISTING C ONDITIONS 2.1 REGIONAL LAND USE Land use patterns in the Santa Cruz Mountains as well as on the San Mateo and Santa Cruz county coasts have not changed dramatically in the recent past. The general character of land use surrounding Butano SP is a mix of natural lands, coastal terrace and valley agriculture, hillside grazing, timber production, and small residential properties. The community of Pescadero is located approximately 3.5 miles north of the park at the intersection of Cloverdale Road and Pescadero Road. Butano SP shares its southern border with Año Nuevo SP, with Año Nuevo State Natural Reserve (SNR) and Big Basin Redwoods SP in proximity. Pescadero State Beach (SB), Bean Hollow SB, and Pigeon Point Light Station State Historic Park (SHP) are to the northwest along the coast. Portola Redwoods SP, Pescadero Creek County Park, Michelson Ranch, and several other recreational and open space lands are located north of the park. Large undeveloped Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST) properties are located adjacent to the park’s west side. Año Nuevo Point and the Santa Cruz Mountains, viewed from Private ownership around the park generally consists of Pigeon Point. relatively large or very small parcels of land. Large parcels of private forested lands, some in timber production, are located between Butano SP and Big Basin Redwoods SP to the east, and also on the park’s northern border.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife and Forest Conservation. Bonds
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 6-7-1993 Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife And Forest Conservation. Bonds. Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits Recommended Citation Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife And Forest Conservation. Bonds. California Initiative 593 (1993). http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits/756 This Initiative is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Initiatives by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE December 9, 1993 TO: All County Clerks/Registrars of Voters (93155) Pursuant to Section 3523 of the Elections Code, I hereby certify that on December 9, 1993 the certificates received from the County Clerks or Registrars of Voters by the Secretary of State established that the Initiative Statute, PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVATION. BONDS has been signed by the requisite number of qualified electors needed to declare the petition sufficient. The PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVATION. BONDS. INITIATIVE STATUTE is, therefore, qualified for the June 7, 1994 Primary Election. PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVA­ TION. BONDS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes general obligation bonds of almost $2 billion, to be repaid from the General Fund, for acquisition, development, rehabilitation, restoration and conservation of park lands, historic sites, wildlife areas and forest throughout California. Includes funds for parks and recreational facilities throughout the State.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Obispo County, California and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ARROYO GRANDE, CITY OF 060305 ATASCADERO, CITY OF 060700 EL PASO DE ROBLES, CITY OF 060308 GROVER BEACH, CITY OF 060306 MORRO BAY, CITY OF 060307 PISMO BEACH, CITY OF 060309 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITY OF 060310 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 060304 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) REVISED: November 16, 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06079CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 28, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Date: November 16, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS – Volume 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 4 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 6 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge Hopper Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex 2493 Portola Road, Suite A Ventura, CA 93003 http://www.fws.gov/refuge/guadalupe-nipomo_dunes/ Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes California Telecommunications Relay Service Voice/TTY: 711 National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Willdife Service 1 800/344-WILD http://www.fws.gov Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan August 2016 and Environmental Assessment August 2016 Photo: Ian Shive Vision Statement Propelled by relentless ocean waves and strong onshore winds, small grains of sand scour and accumulate to form the impressive migrating dunes of the Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). Harsh, but dynamic processes create unique habitats among the dunes for imperiled plants and animals such as La Graciosa thistle, marsh sandwort, California red- legged frog, and western snowy plover. The Refuge lies within the Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Complex (Dunes Complex), an 18-mile- long stretch of coastal dunes located north of Point Sal and south of Pismo Beach. To conserve the dynamic landscape and imperiled natural resources of the Refuge and the Dunes Complex, the Service works cooperatively with other agencies, non-profit organizations, local businesses, private landowners, and private citizens. Working together, we instill stewardship through activities that include habitat restoration, protection of cultural resources, recovery of threatened and endangered species, and opportunities for high-quality visitor experiences in this unique and spectacular dunes landscape. Such cooperative efforts enable all partners to share limited resources to meet common goals, thereby achieving much more together than we could alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Water Quality Through California's Clean Beach Initiative
    Environ Monit Assess (2010) 166:95–111 DOI 10.1007/s10661-009-0987-5 Improving water quality through California’s Clean Beach Initiative: an assessment of 17 projects John H. Dorsey Received: 4 September 2008 / Accepted: 13 May 2009 / Published online: 3 June 2009 © Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract California’s Clean Beach Initiative These findings should be useful to other coastal (CBI) funds projects to reduce loads of fecal states and agencies faced with similar pollution indicator bacteria (FIB) impacting beaches, control problems. thus providing an opportunity to judge the effectiveness of various CBI water pollution Keywords Water quality · Fecal indicator control strategies. Seventeen initial projects bacteria · Beach pollution · BMPs were selected for assessment to determine their effectiveness on reducing FIB in the receiving waters along beaches nearest to the projects. Introduction Control strategies included low-flow diversions, sterilization facilities, sewer improvements, pier The US Congress demonstrated that having good best management practices (BMPs), vegetative water quality at recreational beaches is a national swales, and enclosed beach BMPs. Assessments priority when they amended the Clean Water Act were based on statistical changes in pre- and in 2000 by passing the Beaches Environmental As- postproject mean densities of FIB at shoreline sessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act. This monitoring stations targeted by the projects. Most legislation addressed the problem of pathogens low-flow diversions and the wetland swale project and pathogen indicators in coastal waters by: were effective in removing all contaminated runoff from beaches. UV sterilization was 1. Requiring new or revised water quality stan- effective when coupled with pretreatment dards for pathogens or their indicators filtration and where effluent was released 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]