DOCSLIB.ORG

Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge Hopper Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex 2493 Portola Road, Suite A Ventura, CA 93003 http://www.fws.gov/refuge/guadalupe-nipomo_dunes/ Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes California Telecommunications Relay Service Voice/TTY: 711 National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Willdife Service 1 800/344-WILD http://www.fws.gov Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan August 2016 and Environmental Assessment August 2016 Photo: Ian Shive Vision Statement Propelled by relentless ocean waves and strong onshore winds, small grains of sand scour and accumulate to form the impressive migrating dunes of the Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). Harsh, but dynamic processes create unique habitats among the dunes for imperiled plants and animals such as La Graciosa thistle, marsh sandwort, California red- legged frog, and western snowy plover. The Refuge lies within the Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Complex (Dunes Complex), an 18-mile- long stretch of coastal dunes located north of Point Sal and south of Pismo Beach. To conserve the dynamic landscape and imperiled natural resources of the Refuge and the Dunes Complex, the Service works cooperatively with other agencies, non-profit organizations, local businesses, private landowners, and private citizens. Working together, we instill stewardship through activities that include habitat restoration, protection of cultural resources, recovery of threatened and endangered species, and opportunities for high-quality visitor experiences in this unique and spectacular dunes landscape. Such cooperative efforts enable all partners to share limited resources to meet common goals, thereby achieving much more together than we could alone. Originally envisioned by conservation-minded individuals who valued solitude and the satisfaction of spending time outdoors, we protect the Dunes Complex for everyone’s enjoyment, including future generations. Together with our partners, we coalesce like grains of sand to ensure that wildlife-dependent recreation, environmental education, interpretation, and wildlife photography opportunities exist for the public, and that these activities are balanced with our conservation goals for cultural resources, plants, and animals of this treasured landscape. Disclaimer CCPs provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Environmental Assessment for Management of Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge San Luis Obispo County, California The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has completed the Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). The CCP will guide Refuge management for the next 15 years. The CCP and EA (herein incorporated by reference) describe the Service’s proposals for managing the Refuge and their associated effects on the human environment under their alternatives, including the no action alternative. Decision Following comprehensive review and analysis, the Service selected a modified Alternative A for implementation. The selected alternative is consistent with the following criteria: • Forwards the mission of the Refuge System; • Addresses the purposes for which the Refuge was established; • Provides guidance for achieving the Refuge’s vision and goals; • Protects the sensitive native habitats and listed species present on the Refuge; • Adheres to scientific principles of sound fish and wildlife management and listed species recovery; and • Complies with all applicable legal mandates. Alternatives Considered The following is a brief description of the alternatives for managing Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Refuge, including the selected alternative (a modified Alternative A). For a complete description of each alternative, see the EA. Alternative A Under this alternative, the current management actions, including habitat management, wildlife- dependent recreation opportunities, and environmental education, would be continued at the Refuge. Habitat and wildlife management activities would continue to be focused on conservation of listed species, invasive weed control, barrier fencing, planting native vegetation, and baseline surveys. Limited guided tours and self-guided access to support wildlife observation and photography would also continue under Alternative A. Volunteers would continue to be an important component to support refuge management. The western snowy plover breeding habitat would continue to be closed to the public during the breeding season. The Service would work with partners to support the goals of the Dunes Complex. Current staffing and operating costs would remain the same. This alternative was not selected because it does not address predator threats to listed species on the Refuge. Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife RefugeFinding of No Significant Impact 1 Alternative B Alternative B would include those actions described in Alternative A; in addition, the Refuge would moderately expand wildlife and habitat management while incrementally increasing visitor service and environmental education activities. For this alternative, Refuge Priority Management Areas (RPMAs) were established that represent unique habitat types or provide habitat for listed or rare species on the Refuge that deserve conservation attention. Additional wildlife management activities, such as management of ponded wetlands, feral swine control, and increased monitoring, would be implemented for the purpose of improving western snowy plover hatch rate; protecting existing populations of the listed La Graciosa thistle and California red-legged frog; and aiding in the recovery of marsh sandwort and Gambel’s watercress. The development and implementation of future step-down plans, an Integrated Pest Management Plan and Predator Management Plan, are also proposed. Of the Service’s “Big 6” public uses, wildlife observation, photography, interpretation, and environmental education, would be enhanced on the Refuge, and an action to redirect public access around snowy plover breeding habitat would also be implemented. Refuge staff would develop a dedicated volunteer crew to support Refuge management and outreach. An invasive plant early detection and rapid response program to address the introduction of new invasive weeds on the Refuge would also be developed. This alternative also proposes the future establishment of an office at or near the Refuge. Additional staff and funding would be needed to implement this alternative. This alternative was not selected since it would require substantial increases in staffing and funding which are not feasible in light of the Service’s declining budget. Since 2010, the Refuge System budget nationally has declined by over $20 million while costs have continued to increase. Over the same period, staffing has been reduced by about 12 percent. Alternative C Alternative C, which was developed to take into consideration the forecasted decline in budgets for the National Wildlife Refuge System, would reduce or eliminate many of the current management activities occurring on the Refuge, as well as close the Refuge to all public access. Under Alternative C, the Service’s management actions would be limited to the minimum necessary to meet statutory responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997. The Refuge would be placed in caretaker status, with wildlife and habitat management activities limited to installing and maintaining permanent Refuge closure signs at the beach, maintaining existing perimeter fencing and fencing installed to protect listed species, and inspecting site conditions and implementing sign and fence maintenance three times per year (i.e., spring, summer, fall). This alternative was not selected because of public opposition and limited scope of managing our trust species. Selected Action (Modified Alternative A) The selected action is a modification of Alternative A. Under this alternative, we would continue current management activities, but also include components from Alternative B including implementing the feral swine control plan and developing and implementing a predator management plan to protect western snowy plover as well as California least tern. Because the Refuge would not be staffed locally, we would reduce seasonal western snowy plover monitoring and invasive vegetation control to when staffing resources or partnerships allow. We would annually monitor for the listed La Graciosa thistle and marsh sandwort, collecting and Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife RefugeFinding of No Significant Impact 2 outplanting seed when possible. Invasive vegetation control would be focused on Refuge Priority Management Areas and priority invasive vegetation. We would also develop and implement an invasive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snowy Plover Docent Manual Updated May 2020
    Snowy Plover Docent Manual updated May 2020 C o a l O i l P o i n t R e s e r v e 7 0 6 0 S l o u g h R d . G o l e t a , CA 9 3 1 1 7 C o a l O i l P o i n t R e s e r v e B l d g 7 0 6 0 S l o u g h R d . G o l e t a , CA 9 3 1 1 7 Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ..........................................................................2 Map of COPR .......................................................................................3 Snowy Plovers at COPR .......................................................................4 About the Reserve ...................................................................................5 Snowy Plover Docent Program ..........................................................6 Docent: Educator & Protector .......................................................8 COPR Rules & Regulations .................................................................9 5 Biggest Concerns & Map of Boundaries...................................10 Shift Check In & Check Out ................................................................16 Parking & Additional Information .....................................................17 Public Relations .....................................................................................19 Tips for Contacts with the Public by Kevin Lafferty................. 21 Frequently Encountered Situations .................................................23 Marine Mammal & Bird Care ...............................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of a San Diego Landmark Casa De Bandini, Lot 1, Block 451
    1 Restoration of a San Diego Landmark BY VICTOR A. WALSH Casa de Bandini, Lot 1, Block 451, 2600 Calhoun Street, Old Town SHP [California Historical Landmark #72, (1932); listed on National Register of Historic Places (Sept. 3, 1971) as a contributing building] From the far side of the old plaza, the two-story, colonnaded stucco building stands in the soft morning light—a sentinel to history. Originally built 1827-1829 by Don Juan Bandini as a family residence and later converted into a hotel, boarding house, olive pickling factory, and tourist hotel and restaurant, the Casa de Bandini is one of the most significant historic buildings in the state.1 In April 2007, California State Parks and the new concessionaire, Delaware North & Co., embarked on a multi-million dollar rehabilitation and restoration of this historic landmark to return it to its appearance as the Cosmopolitan Hotel of the early 1870s. This is an unprecedented historic restoration, perhaps the most important one currently in progress in California. Few other buildings in the state rival the building’s scale or size (over 10,000 square feet) and blending of 19th-century Mexican adobe and American wood-framing construction techniques. It boasts a rich and storied history—a history that is buried in the material fabric and written and oral accounts left behind by previous generations. The Casa and the Don Bandini would become one of the most prominent men of his day in California. Born and educated in Lima, Peru and the son of a Spanish master trader, he arrived in San Diego around 1822.2 In 1827, Governor José María Echeandia granted him and, José Antonio Estudillo, his future father-in-law, adjoining house lots on the plaza, measuring “…100 varas square (or 277.5 x 277.5’) in common,….”3 Through his marriage to Dolores Estudillo and, after her death in 1833, to Refugio Argüello, the daughter of another influential Spanish Californio family, Bandini carved out an illustrious career as a politician, civic leader, and rancher.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Status Review for the Snowy Plover in Washington
    STATE OF WASHINGTON February 2016 Periodic Status Review for the Snowy Plover Derek W. Stinson Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Wildlife Program The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife maintains a list of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species (Washington Administrative Codes 232-12-014 and 232-12-011). In 1990, the Washington Wildlife Commission adopted listing procedures developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-297). The procedures include how species list- ings will be initiated, criteria for listing and delisting, a requirement for public review, the development of recovery or management plans, and the periodic review of listed species. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife is directed to conduct reviews of each endangered, threat- ened, or sensitive wildlife species at least every five years after the date of its listing by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission. The periodic status reviews are designed to include an update of the species status report to determine whether the status of the species warrants its current listing status or deserves reclas- sification. The agency notifies the general public and specific parties who have expressed their interest to the Department of the periodic status review at least one year prior to the five-year period so that they may submit new scientific data to be included in the review. The agency notifies the public of its recommenda- tion at least 30 days prior to presenting the findings to the Fish and Wildlife Commission. In addition, if the agency determines that new information suggests that the classification of a species should be changed from its present state, the agency prepares documents to determine the environmental consequences of adopting the recommendations pursuant to requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Selection and Response to Restoration by Breeding
    HABITAT SELECTION AND RESPONSE TO RESTORATION BY BREEDING WESTERN SNOWY PLOVERS IN COASTAL NORTHERN CALIFORNIA By Stephanie D. Leja A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Natural Resources: Wildlife Committee Membership Dr. Mark A. Colwell, Committee Chair Dr. Matthew D. Johnson, Committee Member Dr. William T. Bean, Committee Member Dr. Alison O'Dowd, Graduate Coordinator December 2015 ABSTRACT HABITAT SELECTION AND RESPONSE TO RESTORATION BY BREEDING WESTERN SNOWY PLOVERS IN COASTAL NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Stephanie D. Leja Habitat loss and degradation by invasive species is a primary limitation to the recovery of the Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus), a federally threatened shorebird that resides on coastal beaches in Humboldt County, California. This habitat threat posed by European Beachgrass (Ammophila arenaria) is often mitigated through dune restoration. Some habitat features altered by restoration (e.g., beach width) may influence plover breeding habitat selection. Further study was needed to determine which physical and social features (e.g., presence of conspecifics) influence plover nesting locations. I evaluated this response of plovers to restoration and identified characteristics that influence nest site selection. In an Information-Theoretic framework, I compared nests (n = 81) and random locations within habitat using logistic regression and Generalized Linear Mixed Models to produce Resource Selection Function analyses and conduct model selection analyses. Plovers nested on wider, less sloped beaches, with greater coverage of natural debris (e.g., driftwood, shells) and more conspecifics than at random locations. Plovers nested primarily (84%) in restored habitats, although this was influenced by one human-restored site with 33% of nests.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Size of Snowy Plovers Breeding in North America Author(S): Susan M
    Population Size of Snowy Plovers Breeding in North America Author(s): Susan M. Thomas, James E. Lyons, Brad A. Andres, Elise Elliot T-Smith, Eduardo Palacios, John F. Cavitt, J. Andrew Royle, Suzanne D. Fellows, Kendra Maty, William H. Howe, Eric Mellink, Stefani Melvin and Tara Zimmerman Source: Waterbirds, 35(1):1-14. 2012. Published By: The Waterbird Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1675/063.035.0101 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1675/063.035.0101 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. WATERBIRDS JOURNAL OF THE WATERBIRD SOCIETY VOL. 35, NO. 1 2012 PAGES 1-184 Population Size of Snowy Plovers Breeding in North America SUSAN M. THOMAS1,12, JAMES E. LYONS2, BRAD A. ANDRES3,*,ELISE ELLIOTT-SMITH4, EDUARDO PALACIOS5, JOHN F. CAVITT6, J. ANDREW ROYLE7, SUZANNE D.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Restoration Improves Western Snowy Plover Nest Survival
    research paper Wader Study 127(2): 130–140. doi:10.18194/ws.00199 Habitat restoration improves Western Snowy Plover nest survival Katelyn M. Raby* & Mark A. Colwell Wildlife Department, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Raby, K.M. & M.A. Colwell. 2020. Habitat restoration improves Western Snowy Plover nest survival. Wader Study 127(2): 130–140. Productivity measures, such as nest survival rates, are often used to indirectly Keywords assess habitat quality and guide management practices for conservation of Charadrius nivosus threatened and endangered species. The Western Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosus nivosus is listed as threatened due to three limiting factors: human disturbance, habitat quality increasing native and introduced predator populations, and the loss and degra- productivity dation of habitat. We examined the relative influence of these three limiting factors on nest survival, using 14 years of data (n = 610 nests) at eight sites in conservation Humboldt County, California, USA. Survival varied by year and site, and increased predation with nest age and as the breeding season progressed. Habitat restoration had human disturbance the greatest influence on nest survival. Both natural (tidal overwash) and human- implemented restoration had a positive effect on nest survival, whereas unre- shorebirds stored areas had a negative effect. Naturally restored areas had a stronger effect waders (higher and less variable survival estimates) on nest survival than human-restored threatened areas. Human and predator activity were not strong predictors of nest survival. Consequently, we recommend that managers focus on conserving, maintaining, and creating restoration areas to enhance Snowy Plover nest survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Western Snowy Plover Winter Foraging Habitat Selection in San Francisco Bay Ponds
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Fall 2015 Factors Affecting Western Snowy Plover Winter Foraging Habitat Selection in San Francisco Bay Ponds Benjamin Gabriel Pearl San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Pearl, Benjamin Gabriel, "Factors Affecting Western Snowy Plover Winter Foraging Habitat Selection in San Francisco Bay Ponds" (2015). Master's Theses. 4661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.g49s-rk9f https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4661 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTORS AFFECTING WESTERN SNOWY PLOVER WINTER FORAGING HABITAT SELECTION IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY PONDS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Environmental Studies San Jose Staté University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Benjamin G. Pearl December 2015 © 2015 Benjamin Gabriel Pearl ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled FACTORS AFFECTING WESTERN SNOWY PLOVER WINTER FORAGING HABITAT SELECTION IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY PONDS By Benjamin G. Pearl APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY December 2015 Dr. Lynne Trulio Department of Environmental Studies Dr. Rachel O’Malley Department of Environmental Studies Dr. Catherine Burns The Nature Conservancy ABSTRACT FACTORS AFFECTING WESTERN SNOWY PLOVER WINTER FORAGING HABITAT SELECTION IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY PONDS by Benjamin G.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Obispo County, California and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ARROYO GRANDE, CITY OF 060305 ATASCADERO, CITY OF 060700 EL PASO DE ROBLES, CITY OF 060308 GROVER BEACH, CITY OF 060306 MORRO BAY, CITY OF 060307 PISMO BEACH, CITY OF 060309 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITY OF 060310 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 060304 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) REVISED: November 16, 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06079CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 28, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Date: November 16, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS – Volume 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 4 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 6 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • California Coastal Commission Cdp 3-12-050-A2
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA — NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION CENTRAL COAST DISTRICT 725 FRONT STREET, SUITE 300 SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 PHONE: (831) 427-4863 FAX: (831) 427-4877 WEB: WWW.COASTAL.CA.GOV Th13a CDP 3-12-050-A2 (OCEANO DUNES DUST CONTROL AMENDMENT) APRIL 15, 2021 EXHIBITS Table of Contents Exhibit 1: Oceano Dunes Location Maps and Site Photos Exhibit 2: State Parks’ Proposed Dust Control Program Amendment Exhibit 3: Oceano Dunes ESHA Memorandum Oceano Dunes in the Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Complex Grover Beach Arroyo Grande Oceano Creek N EA C O Oso Flaco Lake C I F Santa Maria ACI River P Point Sal Park Boundary Guadalupe-Nipomo 0 1 2 4 Miles Dunes Complex Boundary 0 1 2 4 Kilometers N Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Exhibit 1: Oceano Dunes Location Maps and Site Photos CDP 3-12-050-A2 Page 1 of 4 OCEANO DUNES N Pismo Beach A E (/101 West Grand Ave C O Grover Beach Pier Ave Arroyo C Grande Oceano I Creek F I C ·}1 A P MONTEREY Nipomo Oso Flaco Lake SAN LUIS OBISPO Ocean Dunes^ SANTA ·}1 BARBARA Copyright:(c) 2014 Esri Park Boundary CO Santa Maria LUIS OBISPOCO 0 0.5 1 2 Miles River SAN BARBARA SANTA 0 0.5 1 2 Kilometers N Exhibit 1: Oceano Dunes Location Maps and Site Photos CDP 3-12-050-A2 Page 2 of 4 OCEANO DUNES - OWNERSHIP (/101 West Grand Ave Grover Beach N A Pier Ave E Oceano Arroyo C Grande 1 Creek ·} O C I F I San Luis Obispo C County-owned A La Grande Property P }1 Park Boundary · Nipomo OHV Use Area Pismo State Beach Oceano Dunes SVRA Oso Flaco Non State Parks Property Lake Phillips 66-owned Property N 0 0.5 1 2 Miles 0 0.5 1 2 Kilometers Exhibit 1: Oceano Dunes Location Maps and Site Photos CDP 3-12-050-A2 Page 3 of 4 Aerial of Open Riding Area Image 2442.
    [Show full text]