DOCSLIB.ORG

Generated with Expertpdf Html to Pdf Converter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sports Reference Baseball Football (college) Basketball (college) Hockey Soccer Blog Widgets Create Account Login Questions or Comments? Enter Person, Team, Section, etc Search 1 Players Teams Seasons Leaders MLB Scores MLB Playoffs Play Index Full Site Menu Below ▼ Support us without the ads? Go Ad­Free. Brett Roneberg Positions: Outfielder and First Baseman Bats: Left • Throws: Left 6­2, 205lb (188cm, 92kg) Born: February 5, 1979 (Age: 38­292d) in Melbourne, Australia au More bio, uniform, draft, salary info ▼ Brett Roneberg Overview Minor & Winter Lg Stats Minors Game Logs & Splits ▼ More ▼ On this page: Player News Register Batting Register Fielding Teams Played For Full Site Menu Player News Add Your Blog Posts Here Bloggers! Put your articles here for free. See the Sports Reference Linker for details. Hide Minors Hide Foreign Register Batting Share & more ▼ Glossary Hide Partial Rows YearYear AgeAge AgeDifAgeDif Tm Lg Lev Aff G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS TB 19961996 1717 ­1.9­1.9 Marlins GULF Rk FLA 50 192 174 23 37 8 0 1 15 0 0 11 39 .213 .274 .276 .550 48 19971997 1818 ­1.0­1.0 Marlins GULF Rk FLA 53 215 185 25 49 11 2 0 13 6 5 28 35 .265 .360 .346 .706 64 19981998 1919 ­2.5­2.5 Kane County MIDW A FLA 68 270 240 35 65 7 0 3 35 2 5 25 50 .271 .341 .338 .678 81 11 19991999 2020 ­1.6­1.6 Kane County MIDW A FLA 132 599 511 88 147 32 4 8 68 3 2 79 82 .288 .384 .413 .797 211 11 20002000 2121 ­1.7­1.7 Brevard County FLOR A+ FLA 125 531 445 51 116 18 2 2 45 4 2 77 60 .261 .368 .324 .692 144 13 20012001 2222 ­1.3­1.3 2 Teams 2 Lgs A+­AA FLA 137 577 495 66 142 31 4 16 82 6 3 67 79 .287 .372 .463 .834 229 12 20012001 2222 ­2.3­2.3 Portland EL AA FLA 49 182 164 17 43 11 0 5 19 1 0 17 25 .262 .335 .421 .756 69 20012001 2222 ­0.8­0.8 Brevard County FLOR A+ FLA 88 395 331 49 99 20 4 11 63 5 3 50 54 .299 .388 .483 .872 160 20022002 2323 ­1.1­1.1 3 Teams 3 Lgs AA­A+­AAA MON­FLA 81 319 276 41 77 16 3 4 43 3 3 36 49 .279 .363 .402 .765 111 20022002 2323 ­4.1­4.1 Calgary PCL AAA FLA 3 7 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 .400 .571 .400 .971 2 20022002 2323 ­1.4­1.4 Harrisburg EL AA MON 63 248 214 36 63 15 2 4 36 2 1 27 38 .294 .374 .439 .813 94 20022002 2323 0.50.5 Jupiter FLOR A+ FLA 15 64 57 4 12 1 1 0 7 1 1 7 11 .211 .297 .263 .560 15 20032003 2424 ­0.5­0.5 Altoona EL AA PIT 125 491 442 60 124 29 4 10 61 12 6 40 56 .281 .338 .432 .770 191 13 20042004 2525 0.50.5 Portland EL AA BOS 124 542 474 67 132 30 3 17 77 9 3 59 74 .278 .360 .462 .822 219 21 20062006 2727 2.02.0 Altoona EL AA PIT 109 457 400 63 121 19 1 10 74 9 1 51 58 .303 .379 .430 .809 172 12 2006­072006­07 2727 0.60.6 Pastora VEWL FgW 20 70 58 7 13 6 0 1 6 0 1 11 15 .224 .343 .379 .722 22 20072007 2828 2.92.9 Altoona EL AA PIT 77 273 238 38 59 10 3 8 35 8 0 32 39 .248 .342 .416 .758 99 YearYear AgeAge AgeDifAgeDif Tm Lg Lev Aff G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS TB Minors (11 seasoMinors (11 seasons)… Minors 1081 4466 3880 557 1069 211 26 79 548 62 30 505 621 .276 .359 .404 .764 1569 All Levels (11 SeAll Levels (11 Seasons)… 1101 4536 3938 564 1082 217 26 80 554 62 31 516 636 .275 .359 .404 .763 1591 AA (6 seasons)AA (6 seasons) Minors 547 2193 1932 281 542 114 13 54 302 41 11 226 290 .281 .356 .437 .793 844 61 A+ (3 seasons)A+ (3 seasons) Minors 228 990 833 104 227 39 7 13 115 10 6 134 125 .273 .372 .383 .755 319 20 A (2 seasons)A (2 seasons) Minors 200 869 751 123 212 39 4 11 103 5 7 104 132 .282 .371 .389 .759 292 22 Rk (2 seasons)Rk (2 seasons) Minors 103 407 359 48 86 19 2 1 28 6 5 39 74 .240 .319 .312 .631 112 10 Register Fielding Share & more ▼ Glossary Hide Partial Rows _ YearYear AgeAge TmTm Lg Lev Aff G GS CG Inn Ch PO A E DP Fld% RF/9 RF/G PB WP SB CS CS% lgCS% PO 19961996 1717 MarlinsMarlins GULF Rk FLA 1B 31 270 250 16 4 22 .985 8.58 _ 19961996 1717 MarlinsMarlins GULF Rk FLA LF 6 _ 19961996 1717 MarlinsMarlins GULF Rk FLA OF 17 25 23 2 0 1 1.000 1.47 _ 19961996 1717 MarlinsMarlins GULF Rk FLA RF 11 _ 19971997 1818 MarlinsMarlins GULF Rk FLA 1B 53 513 481 29 3 26 .994 9.62 _ 19981998 1919 Kane CountyKane County MIDW A FLA OF 68 111 105 1 5 0 .955 1.56 _ 19981998 1919 Kane CountyKane County MIDW A FLA RF 68 _ 19991999 2020 Kane CountyKane County MIDW A FLA 1B 3 24 24 0 0 2 1.000 8.00 _ 19991999 2020 Kane CountyKane County MIDW A FLA OF 126 227 214 10 3 1 .987 1.78 _ 19991999 2020 Kane CountyKane County MIDW A FLA RF 126 _ 20002000 2121 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA 1B 9 99 92 7 0 4 1.000 11.00 _ 20002000 2121 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA CF 3 _ 20002000 2121 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA OF 117 241 223 12 6 3 .975 2.01 _ 20002000 2121 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA RF 114 _ 20012001 2222 2 Teams2 Teams 2 Lgs A+­AA FLA 1B 13 106 101 4 1 14 .991 8.08 _ 20012001 2222 2 Teams2 Teams 2 Lgs AA­A+ FLA LF 45 _ 20012001 2222 2 Teams2 Teams 2 Lgs A+­AA FLA OF 112 202 191 8 3 3 .985 1.78 _ 20012001 2222 2 Teams2 Teams 2 Lgs A+­AA FLA RF 69 _ 20012001 2222 PortlandPortland EL AA FLA 1B 1 11 10 1 0 1 1.000 11.00 _ 20012001 2222 PortlandPortland EL AA FLA LF 43 _ 20012001 2222 PortlandPortland EL AA FLA OF 46 53 51 2 0 1 1.000 1.15 _ 20012001 2222 PortlandPortland EL AA FLA RF 4 _ 20012001 2222 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA 1B 12 95 91 3 1 13 .989 7.83 _ 20012001 2222 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA LF 2 _ 20012001 2222 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA OF 66 149 140 6 3 2 .980 2.21 _ 20012001 2222 Brevard CountyBrevard County FLOR A+ FLA RF 65 _ 20022002 2323 2 Teams2 Teams 2 Lgs AA­A+ MON­FLA 1B 36 289 270 18 1 33 .997 8.00 _ 20022002 2323 3 Teams3 Teams 3 Lgs AA­AAA­A+ MON­FLA LF 29 _ 20022002 2323 3 Teams3 Teams 3 Lgs AA­A+­AAA MON­FLA OF 42 88 83 3 2 1 .977 2.05 _ 20022002 2323 2 Teams2 Teams 2 Lgs AA­A+ MON­FLA RF 13 _ 20022002 2323 CalgaryCalgary PCL AAA FLA LF 2 _ 20022002 2323 CalgaryCalgary PCL AAA FLA OF 2 5 5 0 0 0 1.000 2.50 _ 20022002 2323 HarrisburgHarrisburg EL AA MON 1B 25 190 180 9 1 24 .995 7.56 _ 20022002 2323 HarrisburgHarrisburg EL AA MON LF 26 _ 20022002 2323 HarrisburgHarrisburg EL AA MON OF 35 72 68 2 2 1 .972 2.00 _ 20022002 2323 HarrisburgHarrisburg EL AA MON RF 9 _ 20022002 2323 JupiterJupiter FLOR A+ FLA 1B 11 99 90 9 0 9 1.000 9.00 _ 20022002 2323 JupiterJupiter FLOR A+ FLA LF 1 _ 20022002 2323 JupiterJupiter FLOR A+ FLA OF 5 11 10 1 0 0 1.000 2.20 _ 20022002 2323 JupiterJupiter FLOR A+ FLA RF 4 _ 20032003 2424 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT 1B 70 674 611 55 8 72 .988 9.51 _ 20032003 2424 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT LF 35 _ 20032003 2424 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT OF 49 91 83 7 1 1 .989 1.84 _ 20032003 2424 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT RF 15 _ 20042004 2525 PortlandPortland EL AA BOS 1B 12 76 65 10 1 6 .987 6.25 _ 20042004 2525 PortlandPortland EL AA BOS OF 108 212 202 6 4 1 .981 1.93 _ 20062006 2727 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT 1B 30 27 237.1 236 223 13 0 18 1.000 8.95 7.87 _ 20062006 2727 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT LF 33 31 267.1 72 70 1 1 0 .986 2.39 2.15 _ 20062006 2727 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT RF 8 8 67.0 9 9 0 0 0 1.000 1.21 1.13 _ 2006­072006­07 2727 PastoraPastora VEWL FgW 1B 11 7 64.0 75 63 10 2 6 .973 10.27 6.64 _ 2006­072006­07 2727 PastoraPastora VEWL FgW LF 8 8 65.1 15 13 2 0 0 1.000 2.07 1.88 _ 20072007 2828 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT 1B 25 18 158.1 160 145 15 0 9 1.000 9.09 6.40 _ 20072007 2828 AltoonaAltoona EL AA PIT LF 34 31 251.2 47 45 1 1 0 .979 1.65 1.35 _ YearYear AgeAge TmTm Lg Lev Aff G GS CG Inn Ch PO A E DP Fld% RF/9 RF/G PB WP SB CS CS% lgCS% PO _ Minors (10 seasons)Minors (10 seasons) Minors 1B 282 45 395.2 2447 2262 167 18 206 .993 9.01 8.61 _ Minors (6 seasons)Minors (6 seasons) Minors LF 182 62 519.0 119 115 2 2 0 _ Minors (8 seasons)Minors (8 seasons) Minors OF 639 1197 1124 49 24 11 .980 1.84 _ Minors (8 seasons)Minors (8 seasons) Minors RF 424 8 67.0 9 9 0 0 0 _ All Levels (10 Seasons)All Levels (10 Seasons) 1B 293 52 459.2 2522 2325 177 20 212 .992 9.18 8.54 _ All Levels (6 Seasons)All Levels (6 Seasons) LF 190 70 584.1 134 128 4 2 0 _ All Levels (8 Seasons)All Levels (8 Seasons) OF 639 1197 1124 49 24 11 .980 1.84 _ All Levels (8 Seasons)All Levels (8 Seasons) RF 424 8 67.0 9 9 0 0 0 _ A 7890 (underlined) value in the totals indicates career mark is incomplete.
Recommended publications
  • Bbn Brevard Business News

    Bbn Brevard Business News

    Brevard Business BBN News Vol. 33 No. 15 April 13, 2015 $1.00 A Weekly Space Coast Business Magazine with Publishing Roots in America since 1839 UCI marks its 20th year as provider in medical–imaging arena By Ken Datzman The American Cancer Society’s annual cancer–statistics report finds that a 22 percent drop in cancer mortality over two decades led to the avoidance of more than 1.5 million cancer deaths that would have occurred if peak rates had persisted. The information was released in two reports: “Cancer Statistics 2015,” published in “CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,” and its companion, the consumer publication, “Cancer Facts & Figures 2015.” Each year, the ACS compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival based on incidence data from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Center for Health Statistics. Many factors have contributed to reduced cancer deaths in America, including advances in cancer prevention and early detection and treatment. Clearly, medical–imaging technol- ogy has been at the forefront of early detection and prolonging and saving lives. Various studies have linked the use of imaging examinations to longer life expect- ancy, declines in mortality, less need for exploratory surgery, fewer hospital admis- sions, and shorter lengths of hospital stays, according to research by the American College of Radiology and the Neiman Health Policy Institute, with other organizations also providing data for the report. Locally, one longtime business that special- izes in providing full medical–imaging services has seen firsthand the value of diagnostics, from both the patient and the physician perspective, and has internal data to support BBN photo — Adrienne B.
  • A Statistical Study Nicholas Lambrianou 13' Dr. Nicko

    A Statistical Study Nicholas Lambrianou 13' Dr. Nicko

    Examining if High-Team Payroll Leads to High-Team Performance in Baseball: A Statistical Study Nicholas Lambrianou 13' B.S. In Mathematics with Minors in English and Economics Dr. Nickolas Kintos Thesis Advisor Thesis submitted to: Honors Program of Saint Peter's University April 2013 Lambrianou 2 Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Study and its Questions 3 An Introduction to the project, its questions, and a breakdown of the chapters that follow Chapter 2: The Baseball Statistics 5 An explanation of the baseball statistics used for the study, including what the statistics measure, how they measure what they do, and their strengths and weaknesses Chapter 3: Statistical Methods and Procedures 16 An introduction to the statistical methods applied to each statistic and an explanation of what the possible results would mean Chapter 4: Results and the Tampa Bay Rays 22 The results of the study, what they mean against the possibilities and other results, and a short analysis of a team that stood out in the study Chapter 5: The Continuing Conclusion 39 A continuation of the results, followed by ideas for future study that continue to project or stem from it for future baseball analysis Appendix 41 References 42 Lambrianou 3 Chapter 1: The Study and its Questions Does high payroll necessarily mean higher performance for all baseball statistics? Major League Baseball (MLB) is a league of different teams in different cities all across the United States, and those locations strongly influence the market of the team and thus the payroll. Year after year, a certain amount of teams, including the usual ones in big markets, choose to spend a great amount on payroll in hopes of improving their team and its player value output, but at times the statistics produced by these teams may not match the difference in payroll with other teams.
  • Improving the FIP Model

    Improving the FIP Model

    Project Number: MQP-SDO-204 Improving the FIP Model A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to The Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by Joseph Flanagan April 2014 Approved: Professor Sarah Olson Abstract The goal of this project is to improve the Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) model for evaluating Major League Baseball starting pitchers. FIP attempts to separate a pitcher's controllable performance from random variation and the performance of his defense. Data from the 2002-2013 seasons will be analyzed and the results will be incorporated into a new metric. The new proposed model will be called jFIP. jFIP adds popups and hit by pitch to the fielding independent stats and also includes adjustments for a pitcher's defense and his efficiency in completing innings. Initial results suggest that the new metric is better than FIP at predicting pitcher ERA. Executive Summary Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) is a metric created to measure pitcher performance. FIP can trace its roots back to research done by Voros McCracken in pursuit of winning his fantasy baseball league. McCracken discovered that there was little difference in the abilities of pitchers to prevent balls in play from becoming hits. Since individual pitchers can have greatly varying levels of effectiveness, this led him to wonder what pitchers did have control over. He found three that stood apart from the rest: strikeouts, walks, and home runs. Because these events involve only the batter and the pitcher, they are referred to as “fielding independent." FIP takes only strikeouts, walks, home runs, and innings pitched as inputs and it is scaled to earned run average (ERA) to allow for easier and more useful comparisons, as ERA has traditionally been one of the most important statistics for evaluating pitchers.
  • Ttabvue-91245750-OPP-44.Pdf

    Ttabvue-91245750-OPP-44.Pdf

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA1104197 Filing date: 12/24/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91245750 Party Defendant The National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues, Inc. Baseball Leagues, Inc. Correspondence MARY FRAN LOVE Address MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C. 4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310 FAIRFAX, VA 22033 UNITED STATES Primary Email: [email protected] Secondary Email(s): [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 202-247-7929 Submission Testimony For Defendant Filer's Name H. David Starr Filer's email [email protected] Signature /H. David Starr/ Date 12/24/2020 Attachments FOUNTAIN Trial Declaration with Exhibits.pdf(4239674 bytes ) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ------------------------------------------------------- Portland Mavericks Baseball Club, Inc., ) Opposition No. 91245750 [Parent] ) Opposition No. 91245751 Opposer, ) ) DECLARATION OF v. ) ROBERT FOUNTAIN ) The National Association of ) Professional Baseball Leagues, Inc., ) ) Applicant. ) ) ------------------------------------------------------- I, Robert Fountain, declare that: 1. I was formerly employed by The National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues, Inc. (“Applicant”) from August 2010 through September 2020. My final position with Applicant was serving as its Deputy General Counsel. I make this Declaration based on my personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances stated below. 2. Applicant is non-profit trade association of professional baseball leagues and teams. It trades under the name Minor League Baseball. Applicant’s website is attached as Exhibit A from the following url: http://www.milb.com/milb/history/general_history.jsp.
  • 2017 OREGON STATE BASEBALL TABLE of CONTENTS Table Of

    2017 OREGON STATE BASEBALL TABLE of CONTENTS Table Of

    Twitter.com/BeaverBaseball 2017 OREGON STATE BASEBALL Instagram.com/BeaverBaseball Facebook.com/OregonStateBaseball TABLE OF CONTENTS Table Of Contents Covering The Beavers Oregon State Baseball 2017 Regional Guide Page Topic The Oregon State Athletics Communications of- 2 Oregon State Information fice appreciates your interest in the 2017 Oregon State 2 Oregon State NCAA Regional Notes baseball team. Please contact Assistant Director for Ath- 3 Oregon State Roster letic Communications Hank Hager for any media needs concerning the Oregon State baseball team. He can be The Team reached by email at [email protected] or by Page Topic calling the Oregon State at (541) 737-7472. 4 Head Coach Pat Casey The following is a set of guidelines for covering the 6 Associate Head Coach Pat Bailey club during the postseason. 7 Assistant Coach Andy Jenkins 8 Assistant Coach Nate Yeskie Postseason Guide 9 Coaching Staff Please note that this postseason guide is being fur- 10 Player Bios nished for members of the media to provide informa- 25 Career Statistics tion regarding the Oregon State baseball team and the postseason. Copies of the guide will be made available 2017 Season on osubeavers.com in addition to printed copies at the Page Topic game site. 28 Overall Statistics 29 Pac-12 Only Statistics Game Notes 30 Non-Conference Statistics A set of Oregon State game notes will be made avail- 31 Game-By-Game Results able to members of the media prior to each game. To be 32 At A Glance/Home Run Breakdown/Beavers In The Rankings included on the Oregon State baseball e-mail list in order 33 2017 Honors to receive the notes prior to the game, please contact 34 Offensive Breakdown Hank Hager.
  • Titusville, Fl

    Titusville, Fl

    TITUSVILLE • MIMS COCOA THE CAPE NORTH BREVARD PORT ST JOHN MERRITT ISLAND COCOA BEACH American Made @HometownNewsBrevard @hometownnewsbrevard @HometownNewsBre Vol. 14, No. 8 www.HometownNewsBrevard.com Friday, March 2, 2018 • Lifetime Warranty • Even against salty air THOSE WHO SERVE WHITING BITING ICONIC PITONS Over 20 colors available - Maintenance Free Read the latest Ella Jones, 4, and Marie and Jim Nordahl Won’t Crack or Warp - Mildew, Stain, and Termite Resistant - Assembled with Stainless Steel Hardware news about military Julian Jones, 3, catch a of Satellite Beach visit 1220 Ridgewood Ave. members and first whiting with help from St. Lucia and its pair of responders their father volcanic spires Holly Hill 386-258-3338 HOMETOWN HEROES 15 CATCH OF THE WEEK 16 TOURING WITH THE TOWNIES 20 www.amishdirectfurn.com Historic Cocoa Village Association presents Walk a mile in her shoes Locals soar Indialantic SpringSpring spattered pigment painter aboard a FineFine ArtArt && David Cruey was among many 1920s-era CraftCraft FairFair artists who decorated and donated high airplane heels to the By Gaylon Parker Saturday March 3rd 10am-5pm & Walk in Her [email protected] Sunday March 4th Shoes: Stomping 10am -4pm Out the Violence TITUSVILLE — For anybody who auction to wanted a chance to be a part of his- OverOver 150150 UniqueUnique tory, the opportunity presented benefit Serene ArtisansArtisans itself on Feb. 13 at Treasure Coast Harbor Domestic International Airport. The day fea- Many Competing for Over Violence Center tured rides on a 1920s-era plane $6000 in Cash & Awards! Fantastic Street Food on Feb. 23 at known as a “Ford Tri-Motor” and Family Fun the Space Coast dozens of people participated in the Kid & Pet Friendly Convention flights.
  • Lease Renewal for the Vancouver Canadians

    Lease Renewal for the Vancouver Canadians

    November 27, 1997 SUBJECT: NAT BAILEY STADIUM - LEASE RENEWAL FOR THE VANCOUVER CANADIANS RECOMMENDATIONS: A. THAT the Board approve a three year renewal (January 1, 1998 - December 31, 2000) with a two year option to JSS Sports Inc., operator of the Vancouver Canadians Baseball Club, for the lease of Nat Bailey Stadium B. THAT the existing rent structure remain at $100,000 per year or 15% of gross admission sales, whichever is greater. C. THAT other modifications to the lease be made, subject to the approval of the General Manager and the General Manager of the Vancouver Canadians. D. THAT no legal rights shall arise hereby and none shall arise thereafter until the execution the contemplated documents BACKGROUND Nat Bailey Stadium was built on its current site in the early 1950's and has had a number of tenants operating professional baseball teams. At times the stadium has reverted back to the city or Park Board and operated for amateur use. In 1977 the stadium was leased to the Vancouver Canadians for a five year period with an option for a five year renewal. A further five year lease was approved in 1987 with an option for another five year renewal. In 1993, when JSS Sports (the owner of the Vancouver Canadians) exercised their option, the Board increased the rent from a base of $50,000 per year or 15% of gross admission sales, whichever is greater, to $100,000 per year or 15% of gross admission sales, whichever is greater. The Canadians had been very successful in increasing attendance and the base rent had been surpassed during all five years leading up to the rent review.
  • PAT CASEY PAT CASEY Head Coach • 24Th Year 845-446-5 (Oregon State) 1,016-560-6 (30 Years) #5 George Fox, ‘90

    PAT CASEY PAT CASEY Head Coach • 24Th Year 845-446-5 (Oregon State) 1,016-560-6 (30 Years) #5 George Fox, ‘90

    Twitter.com/BeaverBaseball 2018 OREGON STATE BASEBALL Instagram.com/BeaverBaseball Facebook.com/OregonStateBaseball HEAD COACH PAT CASEY PAT CASEY Head Coach • 24th Year 845-446-5 (Oregon State) 1,016-560-6 (30 years) #5 George Fox, ‘90 Pat Casey, considered one of the top coaches in the country, is in his 24th season at the helm of the Oregon State program in 2018. One of the most influential sports figures in the state of Oregon and the Pacific Northwest, Casey has made Oregon State a national power. • Oregon State finished the 2017 campaign with a school-record 56 wins. The team went 56-6 overall, and its .903 winning percent- age tied for the fourth-best in NCAA Division I history. • Casey guided Oregon State to its sixth-ever trip to the College World Series, and fifth since 2005. • Oregon State set a Pac-12 record for the most wins ever in conference play, going 27-3. That surpassed the 1981 record previ- ously held by Arizona State at 26 wins. OSU won the conference by six games, the largest margin in more than 30 years. • Casey’s squad was ranked as the consensus No. 1 team in the nation for 10 consecutive weeks to end the regular season. Oregon State began the year ranked in the top 10 and rose to No. 1 by at least one publication for 12 straight rankings. OSU is the only team to ever be ranked for 10 straight weeks or more in the 58-year history of the Nell and John Wooden Collegiate Baseball rankings.
  • Determining the Value of a Baseball Player

    Determining the Value of a Baseball Player

    the Valu a Samuel Kaufman and Matthew Tennenhouse Samuel Kaufman Matthew Tennenhouse lllinois Mathematics and Science Academy: lllinois Mathematics and Science Academy: Junior (11) Junior (11) 61112012 Samuel Kaufman and Matthew Tennenhouse June 1,2012 Baseball is a game of numbers, and there are many factors that impact how much an individual player contributes to his team's success. Using various statistical databases such as Lahman's Baseball Database (Lahman, 2011) and FanGraphs' publicly available resources, we compiled data and manipulated it to form an overall formula to determine the value of a player for his individual team. To analyze the data, we researched formulas to determine an individual player's hitting, fielding, and pitching production during games. We examined statistics such as hits, walks, and innings played to establish how many runs each player added to their teams' total runs scored, and then used that value to figure how they performed relative to other players. Using these values, we utilized the Pythagorean Expected Wins formula to calculate a coefficient reflecting the number of runs each team in the Major Leagues scored per win. Using our statistic, baseball teams would be able to compare the impact of their players on the team when evaluating talent and determining salary. Our investigation's original focusing question was "How much is an individual player worth to his team?" Over the course of the year, we modified our focusing question to: "What impact does each individual player have on his team's performance over the course of a season?" Though both ask very similar questions, there are significant differences between them.
  • 2018 MEDIA GUIDE Bios Player 2018 Review Season 2017 Fire Records Frogs Opponents |

    2018 MEDIA GUIDE Bios Player 2018 Review Season 2017 Fire Records Frogs Opponents |

    front officefront | 2018 manager & staff & manager 2018 | atlanta braves atlanta | MEDIA GUIDE MEDIA 2018 player bios player 2018 | 2018 2017 season review season 2017 | 2018 florida fire mediaguide frogs florida 2018 fire records frogs | opponents | | 1 Miscellaneous Front officeFront TABLE OF CONTENTS Front Office Fire Frogs Records Front Office Directory 3 All-Time Roster 78 Staff Bios 4-6 Single-Season Highs and Low 79 Single-Season Individual Records 80 | 2018 Manager & Staff The Last Time It Happened... 81 2018 manager & staff & manager 2018 Manager and Coaches 8 Yearly Batting Leaders 82 Training Staff 9 Yearly Pitching Leaders 83 Career Batting Leaders 84 Atlanta Braves Career Pitching Leaders 85 Atlanta Braves Directory 11 Year-By-Year Miscellaneous 86-87 Pl ayer Development, Scouting and Minor League Staff 12 Fire Frogs Daily History 88-94 Atlanta Braves 13 | Gwinnett Stripers (Triple-A) 14-15 Opponents atlanta braves atlanta Mississippi Braves (Double-A) 16-17 Florida State League Directory 97 Florida Fire Frogs (Advanced-A) 18-19 Florida State League Hall of Fame 99 Rome Braves (Low-A) 20-21 Bradenton Marauders 100 Danville Braves (Rookie) 22-23 Charlotte Stone Crabs 101 Gulf Coast League Braves (Rookie) 24 Clearwater Threshers 102 Dominican Summer League Braves (Rookie) 24 Daytona Tortugas 103 2017 Award Winners 25 Dunedin Blue Jays 104 | 2017 Pitching and Batting Leaders 26-27 Fort Myers Miracle 105 2018 Player bios Player 2018 2017 First-Year Player Draft 28 Jupiter Hammerheads 106 2018 Top Prospects 29 Lakeland Flying
  • Minor League Baseball Report

    Minor League Baseball Report

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – SUBJECT TO REVISION CONFIDENTIAL CITY OF SAN ANTONIO MINOR LEAGUE BASEBALL DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PREPARED BY: BARRETT SPORTS GROUP, LLC SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 The following report has been prepared for the internal use of the City of San Antonio and is subject to the attached limiting conditions and assumptions The scope of services has been limited – additional due diligence required Findings are preliminary in nature and subject to revision This report may not be used, in whole or in part, in any financing document Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 2 Confidential TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS OVERVIEW III. TRIPLE-A BASEBALL OVERVIEW IV. MARKET OVERVIEW V. PRELIMINARY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION VI. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS VII. FINANCING ALTERNATIVES APPENDIX A: MARKET DEMOGRAPHICS APPENDIX B: BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY REPORT REVIEW APPENDIX C: MLB POTENTIAL LIMITING CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 3 Confidential I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Barrett Sports Group, LLC (BSG) is pleased to present our preliminary findings to the City of San Antonio (City) The City retained BSG to evaluate potential feasibility of the proposed development of a new state-of- the-art Triple-A minor league baseball stadium in San Antonio, Texas Seven potential Triple-A stadium sites have been identified by the City and Populous . ITC . Fox Tech South . Fox Tech . UTSA . Alamodome . Irish Flats . Fox Tech North The City is currently home to the Double-A San Antonio Missions The findings are limited since BSG has not completed market surveys and/or focus group sessions – consideration could be given to completing these tasks Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 5 Confidential I.
  • Markov League Baseball

    Markov League Baseball

    Baseball Analysis Using Markov Chains VJ Asaro Statistics Department Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo 2015­2016 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction………………………………………………….….……..… 2 ​ II. Background………………………………………………………....…… 3 ​ III. Markov Chains………………………………………………….…...…. 4­7 ​ IV. Expected Runs………………………………………………….…....… 7­9 ​ V. Player Analysis……………………………………………………....…. 10­13 ​ VI. Team Analysis……………………………………………………....…. 13 ​ VII. Win Expectancy…………………………………………………....…. 14­16 ​ VIII. Conclusion………………………………………………………........ 16­17 ​ IX. Bibliography……………………………………………...……….…… 18 ​ X. R Code……………………………………………………………....…. 19­29 ​ 2 I. Introduction My love for the game of baseball began when I received a Ken Caminiti Padres jersey when I was three years old. My dreams and goals evolved around baseball throughout my entire life and I aspired to be a professional baseball player. However, as perfectly stated by a scout in the movie Moneyball, “We're all told at some point in time that we can no longer play the ​ ​ ​ children's game, we just don't know when that's gonna be. Some of us are told at eighteen, some of us are told at forty, but we're all told.” Unfortunately, I was told at 18. The passion I held for baseball didn’t end, it just transitioned to a new area, which is where baseball analytics stepped in. I became a statistics major to explore the behind­the­scenes action of baseball, and it led me to this project. Baseball analytics have been in the game ever since the ability to record data, but the start of the 21st century catapulted its importance and usefulness. It all began with Moneyball, as the 2002 Oakland A’s shocked the baseball world with 103 wins and the third lowest payroll in the MLB.