Abstract Book
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Malayalam Noun and Verb Morphological Analyzer: a Simple Approach
Malayalam Noun and Verb Morphological Analyzer: A Simple Approach Nimal J Valath1, Narsheedha Beegum2 M.Tech Student1, M.Tech Student2 ABSTRACT Malayalam is a language of the Dravidian family and is one of This paper discusses the methods involved in the the four major languages of this family with a rich literary development of a Simple Malayalam Verb and Noun tradition. It is very close to Tamil, one of the major languages of Morphological Analyzer. Since in Malayalam, words can be the same family. This was due to the extensive cultural derived from a root word, a purely dictionary based approach synthesis that took place between the speakers of the two for Morphological analysis is not practical. Hence, a ‘Rule-cum- languages. The origin of Malayalam as a distinct language may Dictionary’ based approach is followed along with the Suffix be traced to the last quarter of 9th Century A.D. Throughout its Stripping concept. The grammatical behavior of the language, gradual evolution Malayalam has been influenced by the the formation of words with multiple suffixes and the various circumstances prevailed on different periods. preparation of the language are dealt with here, with examples of noun and verb forms in detail. Mainly Malayalam was influenced by Sanskrit and Prakrit brought into Kerala by Brahmins. After the 11th century a unique mixture of the native languages of Kerala and Sanskrit Keywords known as Manipravalam served as the medium of literary Morphological Analyzer, Malayalam, Suffix stripping, expression. Malayalam absorbed a lot from Sanskrit, not only in Transliteration, Retransliteration, Verb and Noun, Sandhi rules, the lexical level, but also in the phonemic, morphemic and Word Formation, Noun Cases, Algorithm. -
Unsupervised Separation of Transliterable and Native Words For
Unsupervised Separation of Transliterable and Native Words for Malayalam Deepak P Queen’s University Belfast, UK [email protected] Abstract names that need to be transliterated than translated to correlate with English text. On a manual analy- Differentiating intrinsic language words sis of a news article dataset, we found that translit- from transliterable words is a key step erated words and proper nouns each form 10-12% aiding text processing tasks involving dif- of all distinct words. It is useful to transliterate ferent natural languages. We consider such words for scenarios that involve processing the problem of unsupervised separation of Malayalam text in the company of English text; transliterable words from native words for this will avoid them being treated as separate index text in Malayalam language. Outlining a terms (wrt their transliteration) in a multi-lingual key observation on the diversity of char- retrieval engine, and help a statistical translation acters beyond the word stem, we develop system to make use of the link to improve effec- an optimization method to score words tiveness. In this context, it ia notable that there has based on their nativeness. Our method re- been recent interest in devising specialized meth- lies on the usage of probability distribu- ods to translate words that fall outside the core vo- tions over character n-grams that are re- cabulary (Tsvetkov and Dyer, 2015). fined in step with the nativeness scorings In this paper, we consider the problem of sepa- in an iterative optimization formulation. rating out such transliterable words from the other Using an empirical evaluation, we illus- words within an unlabeled dataset; we refer to trate that our method, DTIM, provides sig- the latter as “native” words. -
Children's Possessive Structures
Ling 404 Lecture Notes No.4 Synchronic Clines in Morphology Productivity Clines: Japanese, Navajo, Mohawk, Eskimo, vs. Spanish, Italian, English One of the questions will be asking throughout is where do the above languages fall on the productivity cline and why (providing data and analyses.) One question to ask is to what degree is the lexicon ‘morpheme-based’ or ‘word-based’ (Chapters 3-4)? ‘Working Memory’ is implicated in the choice. For instance, are speakers all equally productive with their morpheme-units as tucked within word, a [-Fusion] language, or do some languages rather require morphemes within words to be memorized and incorporated as part of the lexical item, a [+Fusion] language? In addition to labeling languages as [+]Synthetic (as in Turkish, Hungarian, Spanish, English, Mohawk) or [-]Synthetic (as in Chinese, Vietnamese), the following data provide an additional exercise in teasing out what might be going on in languages which carry such a large number of embedded morphemes. Question leading to mid-term: How might such morphemes in Polysynthetic-type languages be stored and processed? The notion of [+/-Fusion] will be the central question here as we move to our mid-term material of this class. Typically, agglutinative morphemes are considered to be ‘loosely’ structured in that one morpheme has a one-to-one meaning. But the question might rather be how productive are the morphemes in isolation—viz., do they allow for movement? The question of movement, both at the word-level and at the morpheme-level will allow us to determine the nature of +/- productivity and +/- fusion. Regarding Movement. -
Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society — Volume 13 — November 2008 49Th Annual Meeting — November 13–16, 2008 — Chicago, Illinois
Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society — Volume 13 — November 2008 49th Annual Meeting — November 13–16, 2008 — Chicago, Illinois Papers 1–7 Friday Morning Motion and Attention motion is mixed. In the present study, target stimuli were associated with Grand Ballroom, Friday Morning, 8:00–9:40 objects that loomed, receded or remained static in arrays of varying size. Results showed that both motion types received equal prioritization, as Chaired by Gary Chon-Wen Shyi, National Chung Cheng University evidenced by their parallel search slopes, yet looming targets benefited from an overall reduction in reaction time (RT). Further investigation 8:00–8:15 (1) ruled out possible confounding explanations for this RT advantage, Differential Distribution of Visuospatial Attention in Tracking Mul- while a perceptual measure of performance confirmed the attentional tiple Moving Objects. GARY C.-W. SHYI & SUNG-EN CHIEN, Na- equivalence of the two motion types. Taken together, these results in- tional Chung Cheng University—Paying attention to a relatively com- dicate that looming and receding objects receive equal prioritization plex object has shown evidence for differential distribution within the during attentional selection. However, it may be that postattentional pro- object. Here, we explored differential distribution of attention when mul- cesses, possibly those involved in motor preparation, facilitate responses tiple moving objects were visually tracked. In Experiments 1 and 2, we to looming motion. not only replicated the findings reported by Alvarez and Scholl (2005), demonstrating both attentional concentration and attentional amplifica- 9:20–9:35 (5) tion, but also generalized the effects to uniformed circular shapes. In Individual Differences in Voluntary Visual Attention. -
Abstracts (PDF)
Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society — Volume 12 — November 2007 48th Annual Meeting — November 15–18, 2007 — Long Beach, California Papers 1–7 Friday Morning Implicit Memory is a widely used experimental procedure that has been modeled in Regency ABC, Friday Morning, 8:00–9:20 order to obtain ostensibly separate measures for explicit memory and implicit memory. Existing models are critiqued here and a new con- Chaired by Neil W. Mulligan fidence process-dissociation (CPD) model is developed for a modi- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill fied process-dissociation task that uses confidence ratings in con- junction with the usual old/new recognition response. With the new 8:00–8:15 (1) model there are several direct tests for the key assumptions of the stan- Attention and Auditory Implicit Memory. NEIL W. MULLIGAN, dard models for this task. Experimental results are reported here that University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill—Traditional theorizing are contrary to the critical assumptions of the earlier models for the stresses the importance of attentional state during encoding for later process-dissociation task. These results cast doubt on the suitability memory, based primarily on research with explicit memory. Recent re- of the process-dissociation procedure itself for obtaining separate search has investigated the role of attention in implicit memory in the measures for implicit and explicit memory. visual modality. The present experiments examined the effect of divided attention on auditory implicit memory, using auditory perceptual iden- Attentional Selection and Priming tification, word-stem completion, and word-fragment completion. Par- Regency DEFH, Friday Morning, 8:00–10:00 ticipants heard study words under full attention conditions or while si- multaneously carrying out a distractor task. -
Processing Distinctions Between Stems and Affixes: Evidence from a Non-Fluent Aphasic Patient*
cognition, 36 (1990) 129-153 Processing distinctions between stems and affixes: Evidence from a non-fluent aphasic patient* LORRAINE K. NLER SUSANBEHRENS HOWARD COBB University of Cambridge WlLLlAM MARSLEN-WILSON MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge Received June 2, 1989, final revision accepted February 19, 1990 Abstract Tyler, L.K., Behrens, S., Cobb, H., and Marsten-Witson, W., 1990. Processing distinctions between stems and affixes: Evidence from a non-fluent aphasic patient. Cognition, 36: 129-153. In this paper, we study the ability of a non-fluent aphasic patient, BX, to comprehend morphologically complex words when they appear in utterance contexts. Wefirst establish that he is insensitive to the contextual appropriateness of both derived and inflected words. In a further experiment we show that he has no difficulty processing the stems of complex words and conclude th-zt his problem is with the bound morphemes themselves. We then ask whether this problem is due to his inability to access either the phonological form of a morphologically complex word or its semantic andlor syntactic content. We find that only the access of semantic and syntactic content is impaired. We conclude from these six studies that: (a) BN presents a counter-example to the claim that non-fluent patients have particular dificulty with those aspects of morphology which have a syntactic function; (b) BN processes both derived and inflected words by mapping the sensory input onto the entire full-form of a complex word, but the semantic and syntactic content of the stem alone is accessed and integrated into the context. The semantic and syntactic implica- tions of the suffix are never evaluated. -
Cluster 1 Cluster 3 Cluster 2
5 9 Luteibacter yeojuensis strain SU11 (Ga0078639_1004, 2640590121) 7 0 Luteibacter rhizovicinus DSM 16549 (Ga0078601_1039, 2631914223) 4 7 Luteibacter sp. UNCMF366Tsu5.1 (FG06DRAFT_scaffold00001.1, 2595447474) 5 5 Dyella japonica UNC79MFTsu3.2 (N515DRAFT_scaffold00003.3, 2558296041) 4 8 100 Rhodanobacter sp. Root179 (Ga0124815_151, 2699823700) 9 4 Rhodanobacter sp. OR87 (RhoOR87DRAFT_scaffold_21.22, 2510416040) Dyella japonica DSM 16301 (Ga0078600_1041, 2640844523) Dyella sp. OK004 (Ga0066746_17, 2609553531) 9 9 9 3 Xanthomonas fuscans (007972314) 100 Xanthomonas axonopodis (078563083) 4 9 Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae KACC10331 (NC_006834, 637633170) 100 100 Xanthomonas albilineans USA048 (Ga0078502_15, 2651125062) 5 6 Xanthomonas translucens XT123 (Ga0113452_1085, 2663222128) 6 5 Lysobacter enzymogenes ATCC 29487 (Ga0111606_103, 2678972498) 100 Rhizobacter sp. Root1221 (056656680) Rhizobacter sp. Root1221 (Ga0102088_103, 2644243628) 100 Aquabacterium sp. NJ1 (052162038) Aquabacterium sp. NJ1 (Ga0077486_101, 2634019136) Uliginosibacterium gangwonense DSM 18521 (B145DRAFT_scaffold_15.16, 2515877853) 9 6 9 7 Derxia lacustris (085315679) 8 7 Derxia gummosa DSM 723 (H566DRAFT_scaffold00003.3, 2529306053) 7 2 Ideonella sp. B508-1 (I73DRAFT_BADL01000387_1.387, 2553574224) Zoogloea sp. LCSB751 (079432982) PHB-accumulating bacterium (PHBDraf_Contig14, 2502333272) Thiobacillus sp. 65-1059 (OJW46643.1) 8 4 Dechloromonas aromatica RCB (NC_007298, 637680051) 8 4 7 7 Dechloromonas sp. JJ (JJ_JJcontig4, 2506671179) Dechloromonas RCB 100 Azoarcus -
Physiology and Biochemistry of Aromatic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria That Use Chlorate And/Or Nitrate As Electron Acceptor
Invitation for the public defense of my thesis Physiology and biochemistry of aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading of aromatic and biochemistry Physiology bacteria that use chlorate and/or nitrate as electron acceptor as electron nitrate and/or use chlorate that bacteria Physiology and biochemistry Physiology and biochemistry of aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading of aromatic hydrocarbon- degrading bacteria that bacteria that use chlorate and/or nitrate as electron acceptor use chlorate and/or nitrate as electron acceptor The public defense of my thesis will take place in the Aula of Wageningen University (Generall Faulkesweg 1, Wageningen) on December 18 2013 at 4:00 pm. This defense is followed by a reception in Café Carré (Vijzelstraat 2, Wageningen). Margreet J. Oosterkamp J. Margreet Paranimphs Ton van Gelder ([email protected]) Aura Widjaja Margreet J. Oosterkamp ([email protected]) Marjet Oosterkamp (911 W Springfield Ave Apt 19, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; [email protected]) Omslag met flap_MJOosterkamp.indd 1 25-11-2013 5:58:31 Physiology and biochemistry of aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria that use chlorate and/or nitrate as electron acceptor Margreet J. Oosterkamp Thesis-MJOosterkamp.indd 1 25-11-2013 6:42:09 Thesis committee Thesis supervisor Prof. dr. ir. A. J. M. Stams Personal Chair at the Laboratory of Microbiology Wageningen University Thesis co-supervisors Dr. C. M. Plugge Assistant Professor at the Laboratory of Microbiology Wageningen University Dr. P. J. Schaap Assistant Professor at the Laboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology Wageningen University Other members Prof. dr. L. Dijkhuizen, University of Groningen Prof. dr. H. J. Laanbroek, University of Utrecht Prof. -
Word Formation
English 256 Spring 2005 Word (Stem) Formation I. Derivation A. Affixation 1. Prefixation a. English i. write/rewrite read/reread injure/reinjure shoot/reshoot play/replay do/redo move/remove tell/retell ii. large/enlarge dear/endear able/enable purple/empurple rich/enrich iii. do/undo tie/untie fasten/unfasten wrap/unwrap cover/uncover dress/undress latch/unlatch lock/unlock iv. kind/unkind easy/uneasy fit/unfit believable/unbelievable gentle/ungentle afraid/unafraid bound/unbound b. Maricopa (Southwest American Indian) i. a’uly ‘carry (something long)’ aduuly ‘hide (something long)’ ch’uly ‘carry (things)’ chduuly ‘hide (things)’ t’uly ‘carry (something round)’ tduuly ‘hide (something round)’ a’or ‘put (something long) on’ anak ‘put (something long) in liquid’ t’or ‘put (something round) on’ chnak ‘put (things) in liquid’ tnak ‘put (something round) in liquid’ ii. puy ‘die’ tpuy ‘kill’ pom ‘burn’ tpom ‘burn (something)’ ‘er ‘be scared’ t’er ‘scare’ herher ‘be wrinkled’ therher ‘wrinkle (something)’ hmaaly ‘be white’ thmaaly ‘white’ hpily ‘be dirty’ thpily ‘make dirty’ 2. Suffixation a. English i. writer/writer read/reader do/doer work/worker fly/flier sing/singer dance/dancer drive/driver run/runner ii. type/typist art/artist violin/violinist manicure/manicurist left/leftist race/racist duel/duelist iii. quick/quickly childish/childishly true/truly angry/angrily final/finally truthful/truthfully false/falsely amazing/amazingly happy/happily correct/correctly real/really English 256 Spring 2005 b. Kurdish (Near Eastern) aaqil ‘wise’ aaqilii ‘forethought’ draiz ‘long’ draizii ‘length’ diz ‘robber’ dizii ‘robbery’ garm ‘warm’ garmii ‘warmth’ c. Hanunoo (Philippines) usa ‘one’ ?usahi ‘make it one!’ upat ‘four’ upati ‘make it four!’ duwa ‘two’ duwahi ‘make it two!’ unum ‘six’ unumi ‘make it six!’ tulu ‘three’ tuluhi ‘make it three!’ 3. -
Structure and Evolution of Chlorate Reduction Composite Transposons
RESEARCH ARTICLE Structure and Evolution of Chlorate Reduction Composite Transposons Iain C. Clark,a Ryan A. Melnyk,b Anna Engelbrektson,b John D. Coatesb Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringa and Department of Plant and Microbial Biology,b University of California, Berkeley, California, USA ABSTRACT The genes for chlorate reduction in six bacterial strains were analyzed in order to gain insight into the metabolism. A newly isolated chlorate-reducing bacterium (Shewanella algae ACDC) and three previously isolated strains (Ideonella dechlora- tans, Pseudomonas sp. strain PK, and Dechloromarinus chlorophilus NSS) were genome sequenced and compared to published sequences (Alicycliphilus denitrificans BC plasmid pALIDE01 and Pseudomonas chloritidismutans AW-1). De novo assembly of genomes failed to join regions adjacent to genes involved in chlorate reduction, suggesting the presence of repeat regions. Using a bioinformatics approach and finishing PCRs to connect fragmented contigs, we discovered that chlorate reduction genes are flanked by insertion sequences, forming composite transposons in all four newly sequenced strains. These insertion sequences delineate regions with the potential to move horizontally and define a set of genes that may be important for chlorate reduction. In addition to core metabolic components, we have highlighted several such genes through comparative analysis and visualiza- tion. Phylogenetic analysis places chlorate reductase within a functionally diverse clade of type II dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) reductases, part of a larger family of enzymes with reactivity toward chlorate. Nucleotide-level forensics of regions surrounding chlorite dismutase (cld), as well as its phylogenetic clustering in a betaproteobacterial Cld clade, indicate that cld has been mobi- lized at least once from a perchlorate reducer to build chlorate respiration. -
Cree and Anishnaabe Narrative Medicine in the Renewal of Ancestral Literature
MASKIHKÎYÂTAYÔHKÊWINA - MASHKIKIIWAADIZOOKEWIN: CREE AND ANISHNAABE NARRATIVE MEDICINE IN THE RENEWAL OF ANCESTRAL LITERATURE A dissertation submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Science Trent University Naagaajiwanong : Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright Jud Sojourn 2013 Indigenous Studies Ph.D. Graduate Program January 2014 ABSTRACT maskihkîyâtayôhkêwina- mashkikiiwaadizookewin: Cree and Anishnaabe Narrative Medicine in the Renewal of Ancestral Literature Jud Sojourn This work represents an experiment in developing Cree and Anishnaabe nation- specific approaches to understanding Cree and Anishnaabe texts. The binding premise that guides this work has to do with narrative medicine, the concept that narrative arts, whether ancestral storytelling or current poetry have medicine, or the ability to heal and empower individuals and communities. As âtayôhkêwin in Cree and aadizookewin in Anishnaabemowin refer to ancestral traditional narratives, and while maskihkiy in Cree, and mashkiki in Anishnaabemowin refer to medicine, maskihkîyâtayôhkêwina and mashkikiiwaadizookewin mean simply ‘narrative medicine’ in Cree and Anishnaabemowin respectively. After establishing a formative sense for what narrative medicine is, this work continues by looking at the bilingual Ojibwa Texts (1917, 1919) transcribed by William Jones in 1903-1905 on the north shore of Lake Superior and in northern Minnesota Anishnaabe communities, those spoken by Anishnaabe community members Gaagigebinesiikwe, Gaagigebinesii, Midaasookanzh, Maajiigaaboo, and Waasaagooneshkang. Then focus then turns to the bilingual Plains Cree Texts (1934) transcribed by Leonard Bloomfield at the Sweet Grass Reserve in Saskatchewan and ii spoken by Cree community members nâhnamiskwêkâpaw, sâkêwêw, cicikwayaw, kâ- kîsikaw pîhtokêw , nakwêsis, mimikwâs, and kâ-wîhkaskosahk. -
Word (Stem) Formation I
English 256 Spring 2004 Word (Stem) Formation I. Derivation A. Affixation 1. Prefixation a. English i. write/rewrite read/reread injure/reinjure shoot/reshoot play/replay do/redo move/remove tell/retell ii. large/enlarge dear/endear able/enable purple/empurple rich/enrich iii. do/undo tie/untie fasten/unfasten wrap/unwrap cover/uncover dress/undress latch/unlatch lock/unlock iv. kind/unkind easy/uneasy fit/unfit believable/unbelievable gentle/ungentle afraid/unafraid bound/unbound b. Maricopa (Southwest American Indian) i. a’uly ‘carry (something long)’ aduuly ‘hide (something long)’ ch’uly ‘carry (things)’ chduuly ‘hide (things)’ t’uly ‘carry (something round)’ tduuly ‘hide (something round)’ a’or ‘put (something long) on’ anak ‘put (something long) in liquid’ t’or ‘put (something round) on’ chnak ‘put (things) in liquid’ tnak ‘put (something round) in liquid’ ii. puy ‘die’ tpuy ‘kill’ pom ‘burn’ tpom ‘burn (something)’ ‘er ‘be scared’ t’er ‘scare’ herher ‘be wrinkled’ therher ‘wrinkle (something)’ hmaaly ‘be white’ thmaaly ‘white’ hpily ‘be dirty’ thpily ‘make dirty’ 2. Suffixation a. English i. writer/writer read/reader do/doer work/worker fly/flier sing/singer dance/dancer drive/driver run/runner ii. type/typist art/artist violin/violinist manicure/manicurist left/leftist race/racist duel/duelist iii. quick/quickly childish/childishly true/truly angry/angrily final/finally truthful/truthfully false/falsely amazing/amazingly happy/happily correct/correctly real/really English 256 Spring 2004 b. Kurdish (Near Eastern) aaqil ‘wise’ aaqilii ‘forethought’ draiz ‘long’ draizii ‘length’ diz ‘robber’ dizii ‘robbery’ garm ‘warm’ garmii ‘warmth’ c. Hanunoo (Philippines) usa ‘one’ ?usahi ‘make it one!’ upat ‘four’ upati ‘make it four!’ duwa ‘two’ duwahi ‘make it two!’ unum ‘six’ unumi ‘make it six!’ tulu ‘three’ tuluhi ‘make it three!’ 3.