DOCSLIB.ORG

Julius Caesar, Fortune, and Latin Historiography in Twelfth-Century England

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Julius Caesar, Fortune, and Latin Historiography in Twelfth-Century England View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Julius Caesar, Fortune, and Latin Historiography in Twelfth-Century England Tom Stephen Forster Selwyn College University of Cambridge August 2019 This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy DECLARATION This thesis is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my thesis has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee (History). Tom Stephen Forster Selwyn College August 1 2019 ABSTRACT ‘Julius Caesar, Fortune, and Latin Historiography in Twelfth-Century England’ Tom Stephen Forster This thesis suggests that four twelfth-century English historians – Orderic Vitalis, William of Malmesbury, Henry of Huntingdon, and Robert of Lewes (as probable author of the Gesta Stephani) – believed that they had identified a schema that could determine who and what was culpable for engendering events that had been unexpected or whose outcomes defied expectation. These historians were amongst the first writers of the period to attribute such events to fortune, fortuna. After discussing what they meant by fortuna, the thesis turns to consider what all of this meant for their understanding of the maximal limits of lapsarian human agency, as articulated by their characterisation of selected kings and magnates as ‘New Caesars’. Chapter One asks why these historians started using the term fortuna and hypothesises as to why certain of their peers did not do so. It demonstrates the post hoc ergo propter hoc patterning that links sin and specific reverses of fortune in the historical narratives and contextualises this according to the historians’ own words on the subject of the higher purposes of their endeavour. It contends that attribution to fortuna was neither a concession of causal intractability, nor an empty rhetorical sleight of hand, nor any inducement to providential scepticism. Rather, that it served to affirm that the vicissitudes that afflicted human affairs had their proper causes in sin, and that a historian’s forensic hindsight could identify which specific sins had engendered Providence’s disposition of specific events or outcomes that otherwise appeared unjust. As patterns emerged, these could be used to blame transgressors but also to interrogate ethical standards and determine where supposedly virtuous human conventions had wandered from God’s infallible justice. The historians’ interest in understanding fortune thus yielded ethical as well as theological insights. These same historians took an especial interest in Julius Caesar. Chapter Two first examines Henry of Huntingdon and Geoffrey of Monmouth’s contrasting assessments of Caesar’s legacy as articulated by their substantially original narratives of Caesar’s invasions of Britain. It argues that these narratives were chiefly intended as tacit commentary on the Norman Conquest and the means by which unity ought to be pursued. Complementarily, it examines how and why the historians who wrote in the immediate wake of the conquest characterised William, a leader who they suggested was guiding his people to salvation, as a ‘New Caesar’. Chapter Three argues that while it had been easy for eleventh-century historians to account for the Norman Conquest in the simplistic terms of providential reward for virtue, by contrast the events of William II Rufus’ reign spurred interest in whether analysis of events whose rationale seemed unclear might unveil aspects of the working of the Divine Mind – that is, of truth - that humanity had yet failed to uncover. It is also concerned with the fame that King William II Rufus seems to have attracted for the excellent fortune that attended to him, and which the historians implied had exceeded even Caesar’s famed fortuna Caesaris. In suggesting that at least one of their rulers had experienced the perfect favour of fortune for an extended period of time, the historians had defined a state of agency that could be either terrifying, destructive, and Satanic - a scenario explored in Chapter Four - or unifying, restorative, and Godly - a scenario explored in Chapter Five. Chapter Four questions whether any aspects of the Satanic Caesar, a type familiar in Early Modern literature, might be evident in the four historians’ works, and if so how and why. Chapter Five asks whether what can be reconstructed of the historians’ thinking might have supported the view that humanity could, by grace of God, lift itself out of the lapsarian state. To this end, it considers evidence that shows that at least one of the historians believed that a New Caesar’s agency could restore England to a paradisal state that she would never again lapse from. Later in his life, he wrote to say that he had lived to see it happen. This extraordinary claim is shown to accord with his atypical eschatological views. Synthesising the evidence of the texts with a contextual reconstruction of the historians’ intellectual milieux, especial attention is paid to the theories and ideas that lay behind the historians’ rhetoric. To Willie the orangutan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I owe a profound debt of gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Carl Watkins. I thank him for our many stimulating discussions and for his erudite comments on innumerable chapter and article drafts. Also, for his generosity in providing countless references. I could not have completed this thesis without his academic and pastoral support over the past years, and I cannot repay him for the friendship and wisdom that he offered at difficult times. I also wish to extend my thanks to those other members of the Faculty of History at the University of Cambridge who have supported me throughout my studies here. I owe especial thanks to Professor Elisabeth van Houts and Dr Julie Barrau, who gave their time generously for the discussion of my ideas and were gracious in giving references at short notice. Also, to Professor Rosamond McKitterick, Professor John Arnold, and all of the participants of the Cambridge Medieval History Seminar for their comments and encouragement. I am also grateful to the members of the Cambridge Central and Late Medieval Workshop (CALM) for allowing me to serve as co-convener between 2016-18 and for the many fruitful debates. As an AHRC-Selwyn Scholar, This research was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council and Selwyn College, Cambridge, and I wish to record my thanks for their generous support. I am also grateful to the University of Cambridge and the Cambridge Trust for the conferral of an Honorary Vice-Chancellor’s Scholarship. I give additional thanks for the financial support of the Faculty of History trust funds, without which I would not have been able to remain in Cambridge while finishing this work. Special thanks are also due to Professor Björn Weiler and Dr Elizabeth New, whose mentorship and friendship through my undergraduate studies at Aberystwyth University propelled me on to these wonderful years at Cambridge. Lastly, I want to thank all of my friends and family for their endless love and inspiration. My fondest thanks, for all that they have done for me, are due to David Runciman, Carlotta Barranu, Jesse Harrington, and Nadira Padzli. Likewise, to my grandparents June and Frederick Farrington, and Jean and George Forster. Finally, I express my deepest gratitude for the endless support of my parents Stephen and June Forster, and the loving companionship of Happy Egg, Julian, and Willie the orangutan. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................. i ABBREVIATED REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Time and place ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Latin historical writing in the Anglo-Norman domain ........................................................................................ 9 Fortune and Providence .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Julius Caesar ............................................................................................................................................................... 25 Methodological and contextual notes on the present study .............................................................................. 29 CHAPTER ONE: RECKONING FORTUNE .................................................................................32 Studying the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three Minor Revisions
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1-1-2001 The reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three minor revisions John Donald Hosler Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Recommended Citation Hosler, John Donald, "The reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three minor revisions" (2001). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 21277. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/21277 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three minor revisions by John Donald Hosler A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: History Major Professor: Kenneth G. Madison Iowa State University Ames~Iowa 2001 11 Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the Master's thesis of John Donald Hosler has met the thesis requirements of Iowa State University Signatures have been redacted for privacy 111 The liberal arts had not disappeared, but the honours which ought to attend them were withheld Gerald ofWales, Topograhpia Cambria! (c.1187) IV TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION 1 Overview: the Reign of Henry II of England 1 Henry's Conflict with Thomas Becket CHAPTER TWO.
    [Show full text]
  • Nennius' Historia Brittonum
    Nennius’ ‘Historia Brittonum’ Translated by Rev. W. Gunn & J. A. Giles For convenience, this text has been assembled and composed into this PDF document by Camelot On-line. Please visit us on-line at: http://www.heroofcamelot.com/ The Historia Brittonum Table of Contents Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................4 Preface........................................................................................................................................................5 I. THE PROLOGUE..................................................................................................................................6 1.............................................................................................................................................................6 2.............................................................................................................................................................7 II. THE APOLOGY OF NENNIUS...........................................................................................................7 3.............................................................................................................................................................7 III. THE HISTORY ...................................................................................................................................8 4,5..........................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex and the Reign of Edmund Ii Ironside
    Chapter 16 Wessex and the Reign of Edmund ii Ironside David McDermott Edmund Ironside, the eldest surviving son of Æthelred ii (‘the Unready’), is an often overlooked political figure. This results primarily from the brevity of his reign, which lasted approximately seven months, from 23 April to 30 November 1016. It could also be said that Edmund’s legacy compares unfavourably with those of his forebears. Unlike other Anglo-Saxon Kings of England whose lon- ger reigns and periods of uninterrupted peace gave them opportunities to leg- islate, renovate the currency or reform the Church, Edmund’s brief rule was dominated by the need to quell initial domestic opposition to his rule, and prevent a determined foreign adversary seizing the throne. Edmund conduct- ed his kingship under demanding circumstances and for his resolute, indefati- gable and mostly successful resistance to Cnut, his career deserves to be dis- cussed and his successes acknowledged. Before discussing the importance of Wessex for Edmund Ironside, it is con- structive, at this stage, to clarify what is meant by ‘Wessex’. It is also fitting to use the definition of the region provided by Barbara Yorke. The core shires of Wessex may be reliably regarded as Devon, Somerset, Dorset, Wiltshire, Berk- shire and Hampshire (including the Isle of Wight).1 Following the victory of the West Saxon King Ecgbert at the battle of Ellendun (Wroughton, Wilts.) in 835, the borders of Wessex expanded, with the counties of Kent, Sussex, Surrey and Essex passing from Mercian to West Saxon control.2 Wessex was not the only region with which Edmund was associated, and nor was he the only king from the royal House of Wessex with connections to other regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet with the Princes of Denmark: an Exploration of the Case of Hálfdan ‘King of the Danes’ Stephen M
    1 Hamlet with the Princes of Denmark: An exploration of the case of Hálfdan ‘king of the Danes’ Stephen M. Lewis Université de Caen Normandie, CRAHAM As their military fortunes waxed and waned, the Scandinavian armies would move back and forth across the Channel with some regularity [...] appearing under different names and in different constellations in different places – Neil Price1 Little is known about the power of the Danish kings in the second half of the ninth century when several Viking forces ravaged Frankia and Britain – Niels Lund2 The Anglo-Saxon scholar Patrick Wormald once pointed out: ‘It is strange that, while students of other Germanic peoples have been obsessed with the identity and office of their leaders, Viking scholars have said very little of such things – a literal case of Hamlet without princes of Denmark!’3 The reason for this state of affairs is two-fold. First, there is a dearth of reliable historical, linguistic and archaeological evidence regarding the origins of the so-called ‘great army’ in England, except that it does seem, and is generally believed, that they were predominantly Danes - which of course does not at all mean that they all they came directly from Denmark itself, nor that ‘Danes’ only came from the confines of modern Denmark. Clare Downham is surely right in saying that ‘the political history of vikings has proved controversial due to a lack of consensus as to what constitutes reliable evidence’.4 Second, the long and fascinating, but perhaps ultimately unhealthy, obsession with the legendary Ragnarr loðbrók and his litany of supposed sons has distracted attention from what we might learn from a close and separate examination of some of the named leaders of the ‘great army’ in England, without any inferences being drawn from later Northern sagas about their dubious familial relationships to one another.5 This article explores the case of one such ‘Prince of Denmark’ called Hálfdan, ‘king of the Danes’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Celtic Encyclopedia, Volume IV
    7+( &(/7,& (1&<&/23(',$ 92/80( ,9 . T H E C E L T I C E N C Y C L O P E D I A © HARRY MOUNTAIN VOLUME IV UPUBLISH.COM 1998 Parkland, Florida, USA The Celtic Encyclopedia © 1997 Harry Mountain Individuals are encouraged to use the information in this book for discussion and scholarly research. The contents may be stored electronically or in hardcopy. However, the contents of this book may not be republished or redistributed in any form or format without the prior written permission of Harry Mountain. This is version 1.0 (1998) It is advisable to keep proof of purchase for future use. Harry Mountain can be reached via e-mail: [email protected] postal: Harry Mountain Apartado 2021, 3810 Aveiro, PORTUGAL Internet: http://www.CeltSite.com UPUBLISH.COM 1998 UPUBLISH.COM is a division of Dissertation.com ISBN: 1-58112-889-4 (set) ISBN: 1-58112-890-8 (vol. I) ISBN: 1-58112-891-6 (vol. II) ISBN: 1-58112-892-4 (vol. III) ISBN: 1-58112-893-2 (vol. IV) ISBN: 1-58112-894-0 (vol. V) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mountain, Harry, 1947– The Celtic encyclopedia / Harry Mountain. – Version 1.0 p. 1392 cm. Includes bibliographical references ISBN 1-58112-889-4 (set). -– ISBN 1-58112-890-8 (v. 1). -- ISBN 1-58112-891-6 (v. 2). –- ISBN 1-58112-892-4 (v. 3). –- ISBN 1-58112-893-2 (v. 4). –- ISBN 1-58112-894-0 (v. 5). Celts—Encyclopedias. I. Title. D70.M67 1998-06-28 909’.04916—dc21 98-20788 CIP The Celtic Encyclopedia is dedicated to Rosemary who made all things possible .
    [Show full text]
  • A Welsh Classical Dictionary
    A WELSH CLASSICAL DICTIONARY DACHUN, saint of Bodmin. See s.n. Credan. He has been wrongly identified with an Irish saint Dagan in LBS II.281, 285. G.H.Doble seems to have been misled in the same way (The Saints of Cornwall, IV. 156). DAGAN or DANOG, abbot of Llancarfan. He appears as Danoc in one of the ‘Llancarfan Charters’ appended to the Life of St.Cadog (§62 in VSB p.130). Here he is a clerical witness with Sulien (presumably abbot) and king Morgan [ab Athrwys]. He appears as abbot of Llancarfan in five charters in the Book of Llandaf, where he is called Danoc abbas Carbani Uallis (BLD 179c), and Dagan(us) abbas Carbani Uallis (BLD 158, 175, 186b, 195). In these five charters he is contemporary with bishop Berthwyn and Ithel ap Morgan, king of Glywysing. He succeeded Sulien as abbot and was succeeded by Paul. See Trans.Cym., 1948 pp.291-2, (but ignore the dates), and compare Wendy Davies, LlCh p.55 where Danog and Dagan are distinguished. Wendy Davies dates the BLD charters c.A.D.722 to 740 (ibid., pp.102 - 114). DALLDAF ail CUNIN COF. (Legendary). He is included in the tale of ‘Culhwch and Olwen’ as one of the warriors of Arthur's Court: Dalldaf eil Kimin Cof (WM 460, RM 106). In a triad (TYP no.73) he is called Dalldaf eil Cunyn Cof, one of the ‘Three Peers’ of Arthur's Court. In another triad (TYP no.41) we are told that Fferlas (Grey Fetlock), the horse of Dalldaf eil Cunin Cof, was one of the ‘Three Lovers' Horses’ (or perhaps ‘Beloved Horses’).
    [Show full text]
  • Historia Regum Britanniae: Cassibelauno E a Prefiguração Da Excalibur
    Historia Regum Britanniae: Cassibelauno e a prefiguração da Excalibur Autor: Carlos Sousa e Silva [email protected] Título: Historia Regum Britanniae: Cassibelauno e a prefiguração da Excalibur Resumo: Pouco conhecido ou pouco considerado no seio da investigação sobre temas arturianos, o texto da Historia Regum Britanniae, de Geoffrey de Monmouth, encerra ainda assim um conjunto de informações e de sentidos dignos de nota, e reveladores não apenas do ambiente europeu letrado da primeira metade do século XII, mas também dos propósitos político-legitimatórios que animam o autor ao serviço da dinastia anglo-normanda. Entre os motivos narrativos aí manobrados, é possível encontrar, em torno da figura do rei Cassibelauno, um antecedente provável para a célebre prova da espada vitoriosamente concluída por Artur que, alguns decénios mais tarde, Robert de Boron virá a construir em torno da Excalibur. Palavras-chave: Historia Regum Britanniae; Cassibelauno; Excalibur; César; anglo-normandos; romanos. 113 Carlos Sousa e Silva Abstract: So far, the Historia Regum Britanniae of Geoffrey by Monmouth has not been taken into consideration by scholars of Arthurian Studies. However, this historiographical text provides a set of remarkable information and meanings which relaveal not only the cultural environment of the the first half of the 12th century, but also the political and legitimacy goals of an author writing under the patronage of the Anglo-Normand dynasty. Among the narrative motifs present in this work, the figure of king Cassibelaunus is worthy of a careful analysis, since it can be interpreted as a potential antecedent to Robert of Boron’s version of the Excalibur episode, in which the famous challenge of the sword in the stone successfully completed by Arthur makes him king.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey of Monmouth's the History of the Kings of Britain
    The formal/published version of this article appears in Inquire: Journal of Comparative Literature, Issue 2.1 (January 2012): http://inquire.streetmag.org/articles/54 Global Dialogues Issue 2.1: January 2012 A Tale of the Rise of Law: Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain Allen Mendenhall Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain is a tale of the rise of law, suggesting that there can be no Britain without law – indeed, that Britain, like all nation-state constructs, was law or at least a complex network of interrelated processes and procedures that we might call law. During an age with multiple sources of legal authority in Britain, The History treats law as sovereign unto itself in order to create a narrative of order and stability.1 This article examines the way Geoffrey establishes the primacy of law by using the language- based, utilitarian methodologies of John Austin, who treats law as an expression of a command issued by a sovereign and followed by a polis, and whose jurisprudence enables twenty-first- century readers to understand Geoffrey’s narrative as a response to monarchical succession and emerging common law. The first section of this article briefly explains Austin’s jurisprudence and provides historical context for The History. The second section considers The History in terms of uniform and rational justice in the twelfth century, situating Geoffrey’s jurisprudence alongside that of Ranulf de Glanvill and analyzing the complex relationships between sovereignty, law, polis and nation state. The Jurisprudence of John Austin Austin treats law as an expression of will that something be done or not done, coupled with the power to punish those who do not comply: “A command […] is a signification of desire […] distinguished from other significations of desire by this peculiarity: that the party to whom it is directed is liable to evil from the other, in case he not comply with the desire” (Province 6).
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Cnut and the Waves
    Scandinavica Vol 57 No 1 2018 So Far and No Further: The Story of Cnut and the Waves Alison Finlay Birkbeck, University of London Abstract This article traces the history of the legend of Cnut’s abortive attempt to rebuke the waves, from its first appearance in the twelfth-century Historia Anglorum of Henry of Huntingdon to modern critiques of climate change. Early versions located it in accounts of the king’s demonstrative piety, emphasising the limits of imperial power and the need for monarchs to acknowledge the superior power of God. Comparable tales in classical sources and medieval Welsh legends and saints’ lives suggest a possible oral origin for the story. From the eighteenth century the accusation of vainglory was transferred to an audience of courtiers who were rebuked by the pious king; claims were also made about the physical location of the scene. In modern journalistic parlance, Cnut is a byword for a delusional attempt to avert the inevitable, the most recent example being the coining of the term ‘Canute syndrome’ to describe climate-change denial. Keywords Cnut, twelfth century, saints’ lives, piety, climate change 89 So Far and No Further: The Story of Cnut and the Waves In the modern mind, the name ‘Canute’ is synonymous with the story of his futile command to the tide to bend to his authority.1 Whether the great eleventh-century Danish conqueror of England and Norway is represented as a monomaniac rebuked for his delusion of control over the forces of nature, a wise ruler rebuking his sycophantic followers for their belief (actual or pretended) in his omnipotence, or – as in the earliest recorded version of the story – a pious king acknowledging the superiority of God’s might over his own, the fable has resonated down the centuries as a lesson in acknowledging one’s own limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imagined Cartography of Matthew Paris's Britain
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2013 "Queen of All Islands": The mI agined Cartography of Matthew aP ris's Britain John Wyatt Greenlee East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, Other History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Greenlee, John Wyatt, ""Queen of All Islands": The mI agined Cartography of Matthew Paris's Britain" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1118. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1118 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Queen of All Islands": The Imagined Cartography of Matthew Paris's Britain _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History _____________________ by John Wyatt Greenlee May 2013 _____________________ Dr. Brian J. Maxson, Chair Dr. William Douglas Burgess Dr. Thomas Crofts Dr. Daniel Newcomer Keywords: Matthew Paris, Britain, Cartography, Chronica Majora , Claudius Map ABSTRACT "Queen of All Islands": The Imagined Cartography of Matthew Paris's Britain by John Wyatt Greenlee In the middle decade of the thirteenth century, the Benedictine monk and historian Matthew Paris drew four regional maps of Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Group Sheet for Cnut the Great
    Family Group Sheet for Cnut the Great Husband: Cnut the Great Birth: Bet. 985 AD–995 AD in Denmark Death: 12 Nov 1035 in England (Shaftesbury, Dorset) Burial: Old Minster, Winchester. Bones now in Winchester Cathedral Father: King Sweyn I Forkbeard Mother: Wife: Emma of Normandy Birth: 985 AD Death: 06 Mar 1052 in Winchester, Hampshire Father: Richard I Duke of Normandy Mother: Gunnor de Crepon Children: 1 Name: Gunhilda of Denmark F Birth: 1020 Death: 18 Jul 1038 Spouse: Henry III 2 Name: Knud III Hardeknud M Birth: 1020 in England Death: 08 Jun 1042 in England Burial: Winchester Cathedral, Winchester, England Notes Cnut the Great Cnut the Great From Wikipedia, (Redirected from Canute the Great) Cnut the Great King of all the English, and of Denmark, of the Norwegians, and part of the Swedes King of Denmark Reign1018-1035 PredecessorHarald II SuccessorHarthacnut King of all England Reign1016-1035 PredecessorEdmund Ironside SuccessorHarold Harefoot King of Norway Reign1028-1035 PredecessorOlaf Haraldsson SuccessorMagnus Olafsson SpouseÆlfgifu of Northampton Emma of Normandy Issue Sweyn Knutsson Harold Harefoot Harthacnut Gunhilda of Denmark FatherSweyn Forkbeard MotherSigrid the Haughty also known as Gunnhilda Bornc. 985 - c. 995 Denmark Died12 November 1035 England (Shaftesbury, Dorset) BurialOld Minster, Winchester. Bones now in Winchester Cathedral Cnut the Great, also known as Canute or Knut (Old Norse: Knútr inn ríki[1] (c. 985 or 995 - 12 November 1035) was a Viking king of England and Denmark, Norway, and parts of Sweden, whose successes as a statesman, politically and militarily, prove him to be one of the greatest figures of medieval Europe and yet at the end of the historically foggy Dark Ages, with an era of chivalry and romance on the horizon in feudal Europe and the events of 1066 in England, these were largely 'lost to history'.
    [Show full text]
  • How Cnut Became Canute (And How Harthacnut Became Airdeconut)”, NOWELE: North-Western European Language Evolution 67 (2014), 237–243
    Thijs Porck & Jodie Mann, “How Cnut became Canute (and how Harthacnut became Airdeconut)”, NOWELE: North-Western European Language Evolution 67 (2014), 237–243 This is the post-print version, with page numbers of publisher's version added between angle brackets to facilitate referencing. <237> How Cnut became Canute (and how Harthacnut became Airdeconut) Abstract This article discusses the development of the spelling for the name of Cnut the Great, Viking king of England from 1016 to 1035, from <Cnut> to <Canute>. The origin of this disyllabic spelling is uncertain and has been attributed to taboo deflection, the simplification of the consonant cluster /kn/ in English and even a pope’s inability to pronounce the name Cnut. A survey of documents contemporary to Cnut the Great and later chronicles, however, suggests that the disyllabic spelling is found first in sources of Norman origin. As such, the disyllabic spelling <Canute> should be considered a romanisation. This conclusion has important implications for a recently found, early tenth-century coin, bearing the inscription “AIRDECONUT”. In September 2011, a large collection of silver jewelry and coins dating from about 900 AD was discovered in Silverdale, Lancashire, England. From among its items, a coin bearing the inscription “AIRDECONUT” was hailed as one of the most important finds (see Figure 1). Airdeconut was assumed 1 to be “the Anglo-Saxon coin maker’s struggle to get to grips with the Viking name Harthacnut” and, hence, the coin was regarded as evidence for a hitherto unknown Viking king in Northern England around the year 900 (Kennedy 2011; Richardson 2011).
    [Show full text]