DOCSLIB.ORG

Maine Turnpike Needs Assessment Systemwide Traffic Operation and Safety Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maine Turnpike Needs Assessment Systemwide Traffic Operation and Safety Study Maine Turnpike Needs Assessment Systemwide Traffic Operation and Safety Study Prepared for: Maine Turnpike Authority Prepared by: November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Data Collection ...................................................................................................................................9 3.2 Traffic Characteristics .......................................................................................................................9 3.2.1 Average Annual Daily Traffic ..................................................................................................9 3.2.2 Seasonal Variation .................................................................................................................. 13 3.3 Existing Level of Service Analysis ................................................................................................. 14 3.3.1 LOS Analysis Assumptions ................................................................................................... 14 3.3.2 Interchange Merge Sections .................................................................................................. 15 3.3.3 Interchange Diverge Sections ............................................................................................... 19 3.3.4 Mainline Travel Sections ....................................................................................................... 23 3.3.5 Summary – Existing Level of Service Analysis ................................................................... 24 4 FUTURE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 25 4.1 Growth Rate Calculations .............................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Interchange Merge Sections........................................................................................................... 27 4.3 Interchange Diverge Sections ........................................................................................................ 30 4.4 Mainline Sections ............................................................................................................................ 32 4.5 Summary of Future Conditions .................................................................................................... 34 5 PARK AND RIDE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 38 6 TOLL PLAZA ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 42 6.1 Design-Hour Volume Summary ................................................................................................... 43 6.2 Toll Plaza Traffic Projections ........................................................................................................ 44 6.3 Toll Plaza Capacity Analysis .......................................................................................................... 47 6.4 Toll Plaza Analysis – Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................... 51 7 SAFETY CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 53 7.1 Crash Rate Comparison ................................................................................................................. 53 7.2 Current Safety Practices ................................................................................................................. 54 7.3 Current Safety Studies .................................................................................................................... 56 7.4 Other Studies ................................................................................................................................... 59 7.5 High Crash Locations ..................................................................................................................... 61 7.5.1 High Crash Locations 2003-2005 Update ........................................................................... 62 7.5.2 Current High Crash Locations of the Maine Turnpike and Ramp Intersections .......... 64 8 SAFETY AND SPEED EVALUATION – MILE 80 TO 102 .............................................................. 73 9 OFF SYSTEM NEEDS ............................................................................................................................. 77 10 COST ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................... 81 11 RECOMMENDATIONS/SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ...................................................................... 83 Appendix A Level of Service Description ................................................................................................... 87 Appendix B Factors & Truck Percentages ................................................................................................. 91 Appendix C Non-Typical Diverge Calculations ........................................................................................ 93 Appendix D Forecasted Volumes & LOS ................................................................................................... 95 Appendix E Mainline High Crash Location Diagrams ..........................................................................103 Appendix F Ramp High Crash Location Diagrams ...............................................................................105 Appendix G Intersection High Crash Location Diagrams .....................................................................107 ii | Page LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 – Cost of Proposed Improvements by Year ....................................................................................2 Table 3-1 – AADT Mainline Volumes (Vehicles/Day) ............................................................................... 12 Table 3-2– 2011 Volumes at Merge Sections ................................................................................................ 17 Table 3-3– 2011 LOS at Merge Sections ........................................................................................................ 18 Table 3-4– 2011 Volumes at Diverge Sections ............................................................................................. 22 Table 3-5– 2011 LOS at Diverge Sections ..................................................................................................... 23 Table 3-6 – 2011 Volumes and LOS for Mainline Sections ........................................................................ 24 Table 4-1 – Annual Peak Hour Growth Calculations .................................................................................. 26 Table 4-2 – Year When Merge Areas Reach LOS E and F .......................................................................... 28 Table 4-3 –Year When Merge Area Ramps Reach Capacity ...................................................................... 29 Table 4-4 – Year When Diverge Areas Reach LOS E and F ........................................................................ 31 Table 4-5 – Year When Diverge Area Ramps Reach Capacity ................................................................... 32 Table 4-6 - Year When Mainline Segments Reach LOS E and F................................................................ 34 Table 4-7 – Areas between Kittery & Exit 44 Reaching LOS F, 2011-2041 .............................................. 35 Table 4-8 – Areas between Exit 44 & Augusta Reaching LOS F during Years 2011-20411 .................... 36 Table 5-1– Park and Ride Locations, Capacities & Usage .......................................................................... 39 Table 5-2 – Surveyed Percent Usage of Park & Ride Lots ........................................................................... 40 Table 6-1 –Toll Plaza Location and Size Summary ...................................................................................... 42 Table 6-2 – Toll Plaza Design-Hour Volume Summary ............................................................................. 43 Table 6-3 - Mainline Toll Plaza Design Hour Traffic Projections ............................................................. 45 Table 6-4 – Entering Side Toll Plaza Design Hour Traffic Projections ..................................................... 46 Table 6-5 – Toll Plaza Capacity Analysis, Mainline Toll Plazas ................................................................. 49 Table 6-6 – Toll Plaza Capacity Analysis, Entering Side Toll Plazas ......................................................... 50 Table 7-1 – 2003-2005 HCLs on Mainline .................................................................................................... 62 Table 7-2 – 2009-2011 HCLs on Mainline .................................................................................................... 65 Table 7-3 - 2009-2011 HCLs on Turnpike Entrance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Operation and Maintenance Annual Report
    2020 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ANNUAL REPORT PRESENTED BY: HNTB CORPORATION PRESENTED TO: MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY HNTB Corporation 340 County Road, Suite 6-C Telephone (207) 774-5155 The HNTB Companies Westbrook, ME 04092 Facsimile (207) 228-0909 Infrastructure Solutions www.hntb.com October 1, 2020 Maine Turnpike Authority 2360 Congress Street Portland, ME 04102 Ladies and Gentlemen, We are pleased to submit our 2020 Operation and Maintenance Annual Report for the Maine Turnpike. This report sets forth our findings as to the condition of the Maine Turn- pike and our recommendations concerning maintenance, operation, insurance, and depos- its to be made to the Capital Improvement and Reserve Maintenance funds and the Opera- tion and Maintenance budget. Our findings and recommendations are based on a visual inspection of the turnpike facilities performed between April and July, 2020; several additional visual inspections of turnpike facilities made during the year; and, on a careful evaluation of turnpike opera- tion and maintenance procedures. We have periodically reported to the Executive Direc- tor, Chief Operations Officer, or Director of Engineering, on other items which warranted prompt attention. We appreciate the opportunity to provide Consulting Engineering Services and we ac- knowledge the excellent cooperation of Authority members and personnel in the perfor- mance of these services. Best regards, Roland A. Lavallee, P.E., PLS Vice President TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 6. Planning Studies 34 » Annual Inspection Program 2 » Exit 32 Feasibility Study 34 2. Inspection Findings and » Exit 36 Feasibility Study 34 Exit 45 Feasibility Study 34 Corrective Measures 5 » » Gorham Corridor Study and » Vegetative Cover 5 Alternatives Analysis 35 » Pavement 6 » Safety and Capacity Study 35 » Bridges and Minor Spans 7 » Portland Area Mainline » Ancillary Structures 14 Needs Assessment 36 » Drainage 15 » Study of the Future Needs of the Piscataqua » Guardrail and Safety Improvements 16 River Bridge 36 » Lighting 18 7.
    [Show full text]
  • I-295 Corridor Study Scarborough-Brunswick Prepared by Maine Department of Transportation (Mainedot) Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning
    I-295I-295 CorridorCorridor StudyStudy Scarborough-BrunswickScarborough-Brunswick Prepared by Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT) Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning May 2010 I-295 Corridor Study Scarborough-Brunswick Prepared by Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT) Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning May 2010 Acknowledgements MaineDOT Edward Hanscom, Study Manager Dennis Emidy, Transportation Engineer PACTS John Duncan, Director Eric Ortman, Transportation Planner Paul Niehoff, Transportation Planner Kevin Hooper, Travel Demand Modeler Other Staff Participants Ernest Martin, MaineDOT Project Development Dan Stewart, MaineDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Sue Moreau, MaineDOT Multimodal Planning & Operations Unit Russ Charette, MaineDOT Mobility Management Division Tracy Perez, formerly MaineDOT Office of Passenger Transportation Gerald Varney, FHWA John Perry, FHWA David Willauer, formerly GPCOG Maddy Adams, GPCOG Corridor Advisory Committee Brunswick: Don Gerrish, Town Manager Theo Holtwijk, Town Planner Cumberland: Bill Shane, Town Manager Carla Nixon, Town Planner Falmouth: George Thebarge, Town Planner Tony Hayes, Public Works Director Freeport: Donna Larson, Town Planner Albert Presgraves, Town Engineer Maine Turnpike Authority: Conrad Welzel, Manager of Government Relations Portland: James Cloutier, City Councilor Larry Mead, Assistant City Manager Mike Bobinsky, Public Works Director State Police I-295 Troop: Lieutenant Ron Harmon Scarborough: Ron Owens, Town Manager Joe Ziepniewski, Town Planner South Portland: Tex Haeuser, Planning Director Steve Johnson, Public Works Director Transit Providers Working Group: Peter Hefler, METRO General Manager Westbrook: Paul Boudreau, Public Works Director Eric Dudley, Chief City Engineer Yarmouth: Nat Tupper, Town Manager Dan Jellis, Town Engineer Cover: I-295 northbound, Exit 3 to Exit 4 (PACTS photo) Table of Contents Executive Summary ES-1 I. Introduction 1-1 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Route 1 North Vision Plan
    Town of Falmouth Route 1 North Vision Plan | 2017 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The Route 1 North Committee would like to thank the Town of Falmouth residents and business owners, Town staff, consultants, and general public who provided knowledge, assistance and insight throughout the process of developing this Vision Plan. Route 1 North Committee Project Team Chris Wasileski - Chair VHB Nicole Favreau - Vice Chair Arthur Batson Geoffrey Morrison-Logan – Principal-in-Charge Paul Burlin David Woodward – Project Manager Dava Davin Steve Thomas – Senior Advisor Laurie Leonard Renee Guo - Planner Jay Trickett Steve Woods RKG Associates, Inc. Charlie McBrady - Council Liaison Craig Seymour – Market/Economics Town of Falmouth Nathan Poore - Town Manager Theo Holtwijk - Director of Long-Range Planning i Town of Falmouth Route 1 North Vision Plan | 2017 DRAFT Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................... 1 Appendix A – Zoning Excerpt of Residential A District and Business Professional District Purpose .................................................................. 1 Process .................................................................. 2 Appendix B – RKG Route 1 North Vision Plan Market Indicators Memorandum Study Area Analysis ....................................................... 3 Existing Conditions ................................................. 3 Current Real Estate Market .................................. 19 Stakeholder/Public Input .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Maine Turnpike Authority Annual Report Nts by 2019 Table of Contents
    $617$46.9 million in capitalmillion improvements and maintenance 3 major bridge rehab projects 54 lane miles paved $6.2 million in operating budget savings lin CO2capital emissions reduced by 36 tons im 72.6 million vehicle transactions mprovements2009 Maine Turnpike Authority Annual Report nts by 2019 Table of Contents Maine Turnpike Authority ....................................2 Capital Improvements...........................................4 Highway Maintenance ..........................................8 Environmental Initiatives .....................................9 E-ZPass Electronic Tolling ...................................11 Traffic, Budget and Revenue ..............................12 Toll Revenue and Transaction Comparison ......14 2009 Financial Statements ................................16 Staff and Consultants ........................................45 $ million617 in capital investments over the next decade will serve Capital Investment 1.1billion travelers and support 9,000 0 private sector, construction-related jobs Gerard P. Conley, Sr. Paul E. Violette One hundred and nine miles. One hundred and seventy-six bridges. Nineteen interchanges. Seventy-two million vehicle transactions per year. When you look at the sheer numbers involved, maintaining and operating Maine’s most important highway is an enormous responsibility. To fulfill this responsibility, the Authority develops and maintains a comprehensive, long- range business and capital improvement plan that looks out five, 10 and 20 years into the future. The plan encompasses the full spectrum of Maine Turnpike commitments, from pavement maintenance and bridge rehabilitation to 24-hour Maine State Police coverage, E-ZPass technology upgrades and environmental innovations. The plan also ensures public accountability and harmony with Maine’s overall transportation goals. The Maine Turnpike is a major contributor to the state’s economy – first as a carrier of visitors, goods and services and, secondly, as a generator of well-paying, private sector highway and bridge construction jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • I-295 Corridor Update Scarborough to Brunswick
    MaineDOT 295 I-295 Corridor Update Scarborough to Brunswick June 2018 I-295 Corridor Update Scarborough to Brunswick Prepared by Maine Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning Transportation Analysis June 2018 Table of Contents I-295 ............................................................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 1 Study Process ................................................................................................................... 3 II. Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................. 4 Transportation Inventory ................................................................................................. 4 1. Segments .......................................................................................................................... 4 2. Interchanges ..................................................................................................................... 5 3. Related Transportation Facilities and Services ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment Final Alternatives Analysis Report
    Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment Final Alternatives Analysis Report HNTB Corporation August 24, 2018 This page left intentionally blank. HNTB Corporation Acknowledgements Maine Turnpike Authority Staff Peter Mills, Executive Director Doug Davidson, Chief Financial Officer Peter Merfeld, Chief Operating Officer Bruce Van Note, Director of Policy and Planning Erin Courtney, Public Outreach and Marketing Manager Study Team Paul Godfrey, HNTB Ariel Greenlaw, HNTB John Jaeckel, HNTB Chris Kopp, HNTB Sarah Maloney, HNTB Matthew Pelletier, HNTB Todd Pendleton, HNTB Elizabeth Roberts, HNTB Carol Morris, Morris Communications Kevin Hooper, Kevin Hooper Associates Charlie Colgan, Ph.D. HNTB Corporation This page left intentionally blank. Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment Alternatives Evaluation Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. ES-i 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Public Outreach Process ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Public Advisory Committee .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Conformity Analysis : Destination
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 9-1-2010 Air Quality Conformity Analysis : Destination Tomorrow 2010 and the Kittery Area Comprehensive Transportation System (KACTS) Metropolitan Planning Organization Plan Update 2010-2035 (Draft, September 2010) Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Draft September 2010 Air Quality Conformity Analysis Air Quality Conformity Analysis Destination Tomorrow 2010 and the Kittery Area Comprehensive Transportation System (KACTS) Metropolitan Planning Organization Plan Update 2010-2035 September 2010 Prepared by: Maine Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning 16 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0016 With Assistance from: Maine Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality 17 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333 Draft September 2010 Air Quality Conformity Analysis CONTENTS AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS...................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 MAINE’S AIR QUALITY DESIGNATIONS...................................................................................1 Ozone .......................................................................................................................................2 Particulate Matter (PM10) ........................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY ” Herein
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 26, 2020 NEW ISSUE Ratings (See “RATINGS” herein): Fitch: AA- Moody’s: Aa3 S&P: AA- In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law, and assuming continued compliance with various requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, interest on the Bonds will not be included in the gross income of holders of the Bonds for federal income tax purposes. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from State of Maine income tax imposed on individuals. See “TAX EXEMPTION” herein. $130,000,000* MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Turnpike Revenue Bonds Series 2020 Due: July 1, as shown on the inside cover Dated: Date of Delivery The Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Series 2020 (the “Bonds”) are being issued by the Maine Turnpike Authority (the “Authority”) to pay Costs of Turnpike Projects and to pay related costs, all as described herein. The Bonds will be secured on a parity basis with the Authority’s outstanding Turnpike Revenue Bonds, as more fully described herein. THE BONDS WILL BE OBLIGATIONS OF THE AUTHORITY PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE REVENUES OF THE TURNPIKE PLEDGED THEREFOR. THE BONDS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OF THE STATE OF MAINE OR A PLEDGE OF THE FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE STATE OF MAINE OR OF ANY AGENCY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF OTHER THAN THE AUTHORITY. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. The Bonds will be issued as fully registered bonds and, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as registered owner and nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Falmouth Maine Town of Falmouth
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine History Documents Special Collections 2019 History of Falmouth Maine Town of Falmouth Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistory Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Falmouth, Town of, "History of Falmouth Maine" (2019). Maine History Documents. 191. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistory/191 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TheThe HistoryHistory ofof FalmouthFalmouth Earliest Inhabitants The story of Falmouth, Maine begins long before its incorporation in 1718. Thousands of years before European explorers arrived in Maine, Native Americans made their home along Casco Bay. Twelve thousand years ago, as glaciers retreated, Paleo-Indians, followed big game into what is now Maine. Between ten thousand and seven thousand years ago, as the climate became more temperate and tundra gave way to wooded forests, Maine’s indigenous populations shifted from a lifestyle of large game hunting to one of seasonal migration. They moved throughout the year between favored locations for hunting, fishing, and food gathering. With the invention of new tools for food processing and improved methods of transportation, Maine’s Indians expanded their diet This 1871 rendering depicts Cleeve and Tucker establishing their farm. Courtesy Library of Congress. and began to establish trade networks. With new food sources, their population grew. Another warming trend The Wabanaki initially welcomed Europeans as both brought the advent of agricultural production.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Campus December 07 1979 Maine Campus Staff
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Campus Archives University of Maine Publications Fall 12-7-1979 Maine Campus December 07 1979 Maine Campus Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainecampus Repository Citation Staff, Maine Campus, "Maine Campus December 07 1979" (1979). Maine Campus Archives. 1032. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainecampus/1032 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Campus Archives by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. vol.85 no.54 Friday, Dec. 7, 1979 Grad assistants want pay raise by Stephen Olver Graduate assistants Staff writer currently receive $3,150 for a nine-month internship. Most assistants get this minimun pay, Sweets UMO's graduate students are fed up and said. They are requesting a raise to $4,000, they're trying to do something about it. which would equal the salaries at New The approximately 2.50 students on England's other land-grant institutions. campus who work as graduate assistants are According to the Assistant Dean of the reouestina an increase in their salaries, Graduate which are School Patricia Barron, the currently among the lowest in Graduate New England. Board will be making a recommendation "Graduate students at UMO have been at its December meeting underpaid for a salary for years, but now it's getting to increase for graduate students. be a The board matter of simply having enough to live is made up of the faculty ts a chance to help them on," members Botany Graduate Assistant Roger from different departments Sweets said Thursday.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Carlisle Fairgrounds
    Directions To Carlisle Fairgrounds Unsurveyed and sorry Skelly mowings: which Nikki is odontoid enough? Accommodative and cogitable Dru andcenter ceremonial. some socages so stingingly! Recurved Ruby telescope very gnostically while Zackariah remains flawier Shows plots with curt iseli, to carlisle chevrolet nationals will be bused to add the aaca museum in Taken in southeastern South Dakota. Even if you qualify, you may have to wait for an appointment. South in Kansas, south of Emporia. Taken in Constable at the border with Canada. Welcome to Carroll County, Indiana, Est. East in Hood River. Taken in eastern Missouri, south of Chester, Illinois. North, the Falmouth Spur, in Maine. North in Chicago, Illinois. West Toll Road westbound in northwestern Indiana. Taken east of Kinston, North Carolina. Taken in West Bloomfield. East in Shreveport, Louisiana. Taken in western Ohio. The picture is a bit dark, as the sun was starting to set ahead of us in the west. Taken in westernmost Ohio. Taken in Alpine, Arizona. Families with children, singles, couples, and friends. Innkeepers greeted us like family. Friendly staff and nice breakfast, too. Carlisle Parks and Recreation Department. Taken in Donalsonville, Georgia. Taken on the north side of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. On Friday and Saturday, it all came together. Taken near Kingston, New York. Taken in Wailuku, Maui, Hawaii. Taken east of Deming. Our stay exceeded our expectations. Taken on the east side of Fort Worth, Texas. Shows flood waters and data on high water levels. Taken near Federal Way. Get the best route to your destination from fellow drivers. Rockingham County Fair.
    [Show full text]
  • RFP – Route 1 North Preliminary Engineering Falmouth, Maine
    RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR: RFP – Route 1 North Preliminary Engineering Falmouth, Maine September 25, 2020 September 25, 2020 Mr. Nathan Poore, Town Manager Town of Falmouth 271 Falmouth Road Falmouth, Maine 04105 SUBJECT: RFP – Route 1 North Preliminary Engineering Dear Mr. Poore: On a Sunday a few weeks ago, I drove my family around Falmouth, showing them the Route 1 South and Route 100 projects, the Town Hall, and the Route 1 North project area. I told them that I’ve enjoyed investing a significant portion of my life into the Town’s infrastructure, knowing that people will benefit from these improvements for many years. I also told them that the Town feels familiar to me; I care about it and appreciate its leaders and sense that I am well informed about its operations. It’s this personal sense of commitment and care that I brought to the Route 100 project and promise to bring again with the Route 1 North project if our team is provided the opportunity to develop preliminary design. I view the role of Project Manager as deeply involved in the design and communication, steering the project, and ensuring success for all parties. I care about being on time, on-schedule, and on-budget. I think attention to detail and follow through are essential, and I hope you saw those in the Route 100 project as we uncovered issues early in design that avoided surprises later. I also care about communicating regularly and well with property owners; I think we had a successful Route 100 design process and vote partly because those abutting the project sensed that they were well-informed.
    [Show full text]