DOCSLIB.ORG

Directory of Courts & Clerks in Indiana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Directory of Courts & Clerks in Indiana Directory of Courts & Clerks in Indiana Adams County 2 Hendricks County 16 Pike County 35 Allen County 2 Henry County 17 Porter County 35 Bartholomew County 3 Howard County 18 Posey County 36 Benton County 3 Huntington County 18 Pulaski County 37 Blackford County 4 Jackson County 19 Putnam County 37 Boone County 4 Jasper County 19 Randolph County 37 Brown County 4 Jay County 19 Ripley County 38 Carroll County 5 Jefferson County 20 Rush County 38 Cass County 5 Jennings County 20 Scott County 39 Clark County 5 Johnson County 20 Shelby County 39 Clay County 6 Knox County 21 Spencer County 39 Clinton County 7 Kosciusko County 22 St. Joseph County 40 Crawford County 7 LaGrange County 22 Starke County 40 Daviess County 7 Lake County 23 Steuben County 41 Dearborn County 7 LaPorte County 25 Sullivan County 41 Decatur County 8 Lawrence County 26 Switzerland County 41 DeKalb County 8 Madison County 26 Tippecanoe County 41 Delaware County 9 Marion County 27 Tipton County 42 Dubois County 10 Marshall County 30 Union County 43 Elkhart County 10 Martin County 31 Vanderburgh County 43 Fayette County 11 Miami County 31 Vermillion County 43 Floyd County 11 Monroe County 31 Vigo County 44 Fountain County 12 Montgomery County 32 Wabash County 45 Franklin County 12 Morgan County 32 Warren County 45 Fulton County 12 Newton County 33 Warrick County 45 Gibson County 13 Noble County 33 Washington County 46 Grant County 13 Ohio County 34 Wayne County 46 Greene County 14 Orange County 34 Wells County 46 Hamilton County 14 Owen County 34 White County 47 Hancock County 15 Parke County 34 Whitley County 47 Harrison County 16 Perry County 35 DIRECTORY OF COURTS & CLERKS IN INDIANA Fax: (260) 449-7652 Adams County Ashley N. Hand, Magistrate Jesus R. Treviño, Magistrate Clerk’s Office One West Superior Street, 2nd Floor Fort Wayne, IN 46802 James J. Voglewede, Clerk Fax: (260) 449-7829 112 S. 2nd Street, Room A Decatur, IN 46733-1618 Superior Court Pho: (260) 724-5309 Fax: (260) 724-5313 John McGauley, Court Executive 715 S. Calhoun Street Circuit Court Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Pho: (260) 449-7681 Hon. Chad E. Kukelhan, Judge 112 S. 2nd Street, #C Superior Court - Civil Division Decatur, IN 46733-1618 Pho: (260) 724-5307 Hon. David J. Avery, Judge Fax: (260) 724-5308 Hon. Craig J. Bobay, Judge Hon. Jennifer L. DeGroote, Judge Superior Court Hon. Andrew S. Williams, Judge Phillip Houk, Probate Magistrate Hon. Samuel K. Conrad, Judge 715 S. Calhoun Street 122 South 3rd Street Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Decatur, IN 46733 Judge Pho: (260) 449-3491 Pho: (260) 724-5347 Probate Magistrate Pho: (260) 449-7543 Fax: (260) 724-5348 Small Claims Taylor Beaty, Magistrate Allen County Brian D. Cook, Magistrate Michael T. Douglass, Magistrate Clerk’s Office One West Superior Street Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Chris Nancarrow, Clerk Magistrate Pho: (260) 449-7103 715 South Calhoun Street, # 201 Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Superior Court - Criminal Division Pho: (260) 449-7245 Fax: (260) 449-7929 Hon. Steven Godfrey, Judge Hon. Frances C. Gull, Judge Hon. David M. Zent, Judge Circuit Court John C. Bohdan, Magistrate Eric K. Zimmerman, Court Administrator Jason C. Custer, Magistrate Hon. Wendy Davis, Judge Samuel R. Keirns, Magistrate 715 S. Calhoun Street, #300 715 S. Calhoun Street Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Pho: (260) 449-7602 Judge Pho: (260) 449-7566 Magistrate Pho: (260) 449-7118 courts.in.gov/2794.htm Table of Contents | 2 DIRECTORY OF COURTS & CLERKS IN INDIANA Superior Court - Family Relations Pho: (812) 379-1605 Division Fax: (812) 379-1764 Hon. Lori Morgan, Judge Superior Court #1 Pho: (260) 449-4121 Hon. James D. Worton, Judge 234 Washington Street 715 S. Calhoun Street Columbus, IN 47201 Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Pho: (812) 379-1623 Sherry A. Hartzler, Magistrate Fax: (812) 379-1628 Pho: (260) 449-7275 Superior Court #2 Beth Webber, Magistrate Hon. Jonathan L. Rohde, Judge Pho: (260) 449-7289 David A. Nowak, Magistrate 234 Washington Street Hon. Andrea R. Trevino, Judge Columbus, IN 47201 Pho: (260) 449-8000 Pho: (812) 379-1610 Fax: (812) 379-1675 2929 Wells Street, #108 Fort Wayne, IN 46808 Carolyn S. Foley, Magistrate Benton County Pho: (260) 449-8000 Daniel G. Pappas, Magistrate Clerk’s Office Pho: (260) 449-8000 Natalie J. Kidd, Clerk 706 E. 5th Street Fowler, IN 47944 Pho: (765) 884-0930 Bartholomew County Fax: (765) 884-0322 Clerk’s Office Circuit Court Jay Phelps, Clerk Hon. John C. Wright, Judge P.O. Box 924 706 E. 5th Street Columbus, IN 47202-0924 Fowler, IN 47944 Pho: (812) 379-1600 Pho: (765) 884-0370 Fax: (812) 379-1675 Fax: (765) 884-2027 Circuit Court Hon. Kelly S. Benjamin, Judge Lindsey J. Holden-Kay Kim Van Valer, Commissioner 234 Washington Street Columbus, IN 47201 courts.in.gov/2794.htm Table of Contents | 3 DIRECTORY OF COURTS & CLERKS IN INDIANA Fax: (765) 483-4420 Blackford County Superior Court #1 Clerk’s Office Hon. Matthew C. Kincaid, Judge Kimberly Pitts, Clerk 307 Courthouse Square Lebanon, IN 46052 110 W. Washington Pho: (765) 482-0450 Hartford City, IN 47348 Fax: (765) 483-4456 Pho: (765) 348-1130 Fax: (765) 348-7234 Superior Court #2 Circuit Court Hon. Bruce E. Petit, Judge Mark X. Sullivan, Commissioner Hon. Brian Bade, Judge 112 Courthouse Square 110 W. Washington Lebanon, IN 46052 Hartford City, IN 47348 Pho: (765) 482-6502 Pho: (765) 348-2901 Fax: (765) 483-4419 Fax: (765) 348-7213 Superior Court Thorntown Town Court Hon. Donald G. Vaughn, Judge Hon. John N. Barry, Judge 101 W. Main St. 110 W. Washington Thorntown, IN 46071 Hartford City, IN 47348 Pho: (765) 436-2200 Pho: (765) 348-1840 Fax: (765) 436-7900 Fax: (765) 348-5317 Zionsville Town Court Boone County Hon. Samantha H. Spencer, Judge Town Hall 1100 W. Oak Street Clerk’s Office Zionsville, IN 46077 Jessica Fouts, Clerk Pho: (317) 873-5410 Fax: (317) 873-8021 212 Courthouse Square Lebanon, IN 46052 Pho: (765) 482-3510 Fax: (765) 485-0150 Brown County Circuit Court Clerk’s Office Hon. Lori Schein, Judge Kathy K. Smith, Clerk Sally E. Berish, Magistrate PO BOX 85 310 Courthouse Square 20 E. Main Street Lebanon, IN 46052 Nashville, IN 47448 Pho: (765) 482-0530 Pho: (812) 988-5510 courts.in.gov/2794.htm Table of Contents | 4 DIRECTORY OF COURTS & CLERKS IN INDIANA Fax: (812) 988-5562 Cass County Circuit Court Hon. Mary Wertz, Judge Clerk’s Office Frank M. Nardi, Magistrate Destry Richey, Clerk PO BOX 85 200 Court Park, # 103 20 E. Main Street Logansport, IN 46947 Nashville, IN 47448 Pho: (574) 753-7740 Pho: (812) 988-7557 Fax: (574) 722-1556 Fax: (812) 988-5515 Circuit Court Carroll County Hon. Stephen Roger Kitts II, Judge 200 Court Park, # 211 Logansport, IN 46947 Clerk’s Office Pho: (574) 753-7730 Sharon Milburn, Clerk Fax: (574) 753-3596 101 W. Main Street Delphi, IN 46923 Superior Court #1 Pho: (765) 564-4485 Hon. James K. Muehlhausen, Judge Fax: (765) 564-1835 200 Court Park, # 401 Logansport, IN 46947 Circuit Court Pho: (574) 753-7735 Hon. Benjamin A. Diener, Judge Fax: (574) 753-7845 101 W. Main Street Delphi, IN 46923 Superior Court #2 Pho: (765) 564-3711 Hon. Lisa Swaim, Judge Fax: (765) 564-1829 200 Court Park Logansport, IN 46947 Superior Court Pho: (574) 735-6841 Hon. Troy Hawkins, Judge Fax: (574) 753-7845 101 W. Main Street Delphi, IN 46923 Pho: (765) 564-2136 Clark County Fax: (765) 564-9058 Clerk’s Office Susan Popp, Clerk Clark County Government Building 501 E Court Avenue Jeffersonville, IN 47130 Pho: (812) 285-6244 courts.in.gov/2794.htm Table of Contents | 5 DIRECTORY OF COURTS & CLERKS IN INDIANA Fax: (812) 285-6372 Pho: (812) 285-6294 Fax: (812) 285-6258 Circuit Court #1 Hon. Daniel E. Moore, Judge Clarksville Town Court Kenneth R. Abbott, Magistrate William A. Dawkins, Magistrate Hon. James Guilfoyle, Judge Joni L. Grayson, Magistrate 2000 Broadway Clark County Government Building Clarksville, IN 47129 501 E Court Avenue Pho: (812) 283-1505 Jeffersonville, IN 47130 Fax: (812) 280-5548 Pho: (812) 285-6309 Fax: (812) 285-6283 Circuit Court #2 Clay County Hon. Bradley B. Jacobs, Judge Kenneth R. Abbott, Magistrate Clerk’s Office William A. Dawkins, Magistrate Amy Jordan, Clerk Joni L. Grayson, Magistrate 609 E. National Avenue, # 213 Clark County Government Building Brazil, IN 47834 501 E Court Avenue Pho: (812) 448-9024 Jeffersonville, IN 47130 Fax: (812) 446-9602 Pho: (812) 285-6333 Fax: (812) 285-6380 Circuit Court Circuit Court #3 Hon. Joseph Trout, Judge Hon. Nancy E. Glickfield, Judge 609 E. National Avenue Jeffrey K. Branstetter, Magistrate Brazil, IN 47834 Kenneth R. Abbott, Magistrate Pho: (812) 448-9036 William A. Dawkins, Magistrate Fax: (812) 448-8255 Joni L. Grayson, Magistrate Clark County Government Building Superior Court 501 E Court Avenue Hon. Robert Pell, Judge Jeffersonville, IN 47130 Pho: (812) 285-6316 609 E. National Avenue Fax: (812) 285-6284 Brazil, IN 47834 Pho: (812) 448-9031 Fax: (812) 448-8370 Circuit Court #4 Hon. Vicki Carmichael, Judge Kenneth R. Abbott, Magistrate William A. Dawkins, Magistrate Joni L. Grayson, Magistrate Clark County Government Building 501 E Court Avenue Jeffersonville, IN 47130 courts.in.gov/2794.htm Table of Contents | 6 DIRECTORY OF COURTS & CLERKS IN INDIANA Circuit Court Clinton County Hon. Sabrina R. Bell, Judge PO BOX 216 Clerk’s Office 715 Judicial Plaza Drive English, IN 47118 Rhea Harris, Clerk Pho: (812) 338-3113 265 Courthouse Square Fax: (812) 338-2341 Frankfort, IN 46041 Pho: (765) 659-6335 Fax: (766) 659-6347 Daviess County Circuit Court Hon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guide to Judicial Branch
    ’s Legislator Guide to the Judicial Branch January 2007 2 Table of Contents Georgia’s Court System . .4 Supreme Court . .5 Court of Appeals . .7 Superior Court . .8 State Court . .8 Juvenile Court . .9 Probate Court . .10 Magistrate Court . .11 Municipal Court . .11 Georgia Court System (with appellate routes) . .12 Judicial Circuit Map . .13 Judicial Council of Georgia . .14 Judicial Council Budget Developments . .15 Judicial Council Programs . .16 Judicial Council Commissions and Committees . .18 Judge’s Councils . .23 Council of Superior Court Judges . .23 Council of State Court Judges . .24 Council of Juvenile Court Judges . .25 Council of Probate Court Judges . .26 Council of Magistrate Court Judges . .27 Council of Municipal Court Judges . .28 Georgia’s Accountability Courts . .29 Administrative Office of the Courts . .31 3 Georgia's Court System felony offenses, divorce cases and open, independent, n civil matters involving corporations. impartial court system pre- The appellate courts review records serves the fundamental of cases tried in limited and general rights of citizens. Almost all citizens jurisdiction courts to determine if willA come in contact with a court at procedural errors or errors of law that some point in their lives: could have altered the outcome of • to report for jury duty the case were made at trial. The • to settle a traffic ticket Supreme Court of Georgia is the • to testify in court final appellate court in Georgia. • to settle a lawsuit • to probate a family member’s will Managing today’s court operations • to adopt a child requires the expertise of many profes- • to get a divorce, request child sup- sionals other than judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Reform, Texas Style
    SMU Law Review Volume 21 Issue 2 Article 3 1967 Court Reform, Texas Style Clarence A. Guittard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Clarence A. Guittard, Court Reform, Texas Style, 21 SW L.J. 451 (1967) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol21/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. COURT REFORM, TEXAS STYLE by Clarence A. Guittard* R EFORM of the judiciary has been a perennial theme among Texas lawyers. In July, 1918, the Texas Bar Association, meeting at Wich- ita Falls, heard an address by Roscoe Pound on "Judicial Organization"' and adopted the report of a special committee proposing to replace article V of the Constitution of 1876 with a judicial article that would be con- sidered advanced, even by the standards of 1967. The proposal embodied the principles of unification, flexibility of jurisdiction and assignment of judicial personnel, and responsible supervision of the entire system by the supreme court, all as recommended by Pound.! In support of this proposal, the association published a pamphlet point- ing out the need for judicial reform in emphatic terms: The public is in open rebellion. The best of our judges, working in the present machine, cannot always administer justice. The rightful compen- sation of lawyers is enormously decreased, their labors increased, by the intolerable expense, complication, delays and uncertainties inherent in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM 2019 ANNUAL REPORT Ontario County Courthouse, Canandaigua, NY. As part of the 2019 Law Day celebration, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore and Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks recognized Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for the Courts Outside New York City. Judge Coccoma, who held the position for 10 years, stepped down in 2019 and was succeeded by the Hon. Vito C. Caruso. Left to right, Judges DiFiore, Coccoma and Marks. New York State Unified Court System 2019 ANNUAL REPORT Report of the Chief Administrator of the Courts for the Calendar Year January 1 through December 31, 2019 Janet DiFiore Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals and the State of New York Lawrence K. Marks Chief Administrative Judge of the State of New York Associate Judges of the New York State Unified Desmond A. Green Court of Appeals Court System Civil & Criminal Matters, Thirteenth Judicial District Jenny Rivera Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler Chief of Policy and Planning Jeanette Ruiz Leslie E. Stein NYC Family Court Hon. Juanita Bing Newton Eugene M. Fahey Dean, NYS Judicial Institute Tamiko Amaker Michael J. Garcia NYC Criminal Court John W. McConnell Rowan D. Wilson Executive Director, OCA Anthony Cannataro NYC Civil Court Paul G. Feinman Nancy Barry Chief of Operations, OCA Administrative Judges Presiding Justices of the Eileen D. Millett Outside New York City Appellate Division Counsel, OCA Thomas A. Breslin Rolando T. Acosta Sherrill Spatz Third Judicial District First Department Inspector General Felix J. Catena Alan D. Scheinkman Fourth Judicial District Second Department Administrative Judges James P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Hawaiian Judiciary
    PAPERS- OF THE HAWAIIAN 'HI~TORICAL ~OCIETY . NO.7. THE EVOLUTION OF THE HAWAIIAN JUDICIARY. Presented before the HawaIIan Hlstorloal Society June 29, 181'4, b)' HOIl. W. Frear, Assoolate-Justlce of tihe Supreme COllrt. THE EVOLUTION OF THE HAWAIIAN JUDICIARY. TWO PERIODS OF JUDICIAL HISTORY. The history of the Hawaiian Judiciary may be conveniently divided into two periods: The first, which may be briefly described as the period of absolute government, extending from the earliest migrations of Hawaiians to these shores, say about the fifth century of the Christian Era, to the year 1840; the second, which may be called the period of constitutional govern­ ment, extending from the year 1840 to the present time. Dur­ ing the first of these periods but little progress was made in the evolution of the judiciary. During the second period, as a result of peculiar conditions of political, social and indu8trial change, and the intermingling of the foreign awl aboriginal races, of widely different but gradually assimilating ideas and needs, development has been rapid-until now, for independence, for completeness and simplicity of organization, and for satisfac· tory administration of justice, the Hawaiian Judiciary occupies a high place among the judiciaries of the most advanced nations. FIRST PERIOD TO 1840-No DISTINCT JUDICIARY. During the first period the system of government was of a feudal nature, with the King as lord paramount, the chief as mesne lord and the common man as tenant paravail-gen­ erally three or four and sometimes six or seven degrees. Each held land of his immediate superior in return for military and oth~r services and the payment of taxes or rent.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancements in the Maine Superior Court Nancy Mills Maine Superior Court
    Maine Policy Review Volume 11 | Issue 1 2002 Advancements in the Maine Superior Court Nancy Mills Maine Superior Court Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Mills, Nancy. "Advancements in the Maine Superior Court." Maine Policy Review 11.1 (2002) : 35 -37, https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr/vol11/iss1/8. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. SYMPOSIUM ON JUDICAL REFORM SYMPOSIUM continuing theme in the history Under the project, all civil actions in Advancements of the Maine Superior Court1 is the Cumberland County, except for divorces, effortA by the bench, bar and legislature to are specially assigned upon filing to one in the Maine reduce delay in bringing cases to a final of four Superior Court justices involved resolution. In 1838, a petition to abolish in the project. The assigned justice Superior Court the Court of Common Pleas stated that handles all aspects of the case, including “it is a well known fact that when a case all motions, conferences, discovery By Nancy Mills is entered at the common pleas, it is a rare disputes, trial, and post-judgment matters instance that judgment is obtained in a until final resolution. Each year, the Single shorter time than two years.” In 1868, Justice Assignment Project justices were Governor Joshua Chamberlain advocated each assigned to three two-month terms the creation of the Cumberland County in Cumberland County. Superior Court because of the 2,000 From the justices’ perspective, single actions ready for trial, which could not be justice assignment makes sense for a reached for at least two years.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure
    Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure 01 Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2021.indd 1 11/26/2020 2:50:57 AM COMMONWEALTH COURT Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts; No. 126 Misc. Doc. No. 3 [47 Pa.B. 7851] [Saturday, December 30, 2017] Order And Now, this 12th day of December, 2017, in accordance with Section 7(C) of the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts, it is hereby Ordered that all documents filed with the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania that contain confidential information shall be filed in two versions, a redacted version and an unredacted version. This Order shall be effective January 6, 2018. MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge 01 Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2021.indd 2 11/26/2020 2:50:57 AM Appellate Procedure Rules Rule 102. | Definitions. “Docket Entries.” Includes the schedule of proceedings of Chapter 1 a government unit. General Provisions “General Rule.” A rule or order promulgated by or pursuant to the authority of the Supreme Court. “Government Unit.” The Governor and the departments, boards, commissions, officers, authorities and other agencies of the Commonwealth, In General including the General Assembly and its officers and agencies and any court or other officer or agency of the unified judicial Rule 101. | Title and Citation of Rules. system, and any political subdivision or municipal or other These rules shall be known as the Pennsylvania Rules of local authority or any officer or agency of any such political Appellate Procedure and may be cited as “Pa.R.A.P.” subdivision or local authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Judiciary Administrative Office of the Courts Superior Court of New Jersey Middlesex Vicinage
    New Jersey State Legislature Office of Legislative Services Office of the State Auditor Judiciary Administrative Office of the Courts Superior Court of New Jersey Middlesex Vicinage July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000 Richard L. Fair State Auditor LEGISLATIVE SERVICES COMMISSION ASSEMBLYMAN JACK COLLINS Chairman SENATOR DONALD T. DiFRANCESCO Vice-Chairman SENATE N e w J e r s e y S t a t e L e g i s l a t u r e OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES BYRON M. BAER OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR JOHN O. BENNETT GERALD CARDINALE 125 SOUTH WARREN STREET RICHARD L. FAIR RICHARD J. CODEY PO BOX 067 State Auditor BERNARD F. KENNY, JR. TRENTON NJ 08625-0067 ROBERT E. LITTELL (609) 292-3700 JOHN A. LYNCH FAX (609) 633-0834 GENERAL ASSEMBLY ALBERT PORRONI Executive Director PETER J. BIONDI (609) 292-4625 JOSEPH CHARLES, JR. PAUL DIGAETANO JOSEPH V. DORIA, JR. NICHOLAS R. FELICE NIA H. GILL LORETTA WEINBERG The Honorable Christine Todd Whitman Governor of New Jersey The Honorable Donald T. DiFrancesco President of the Senate The Honorable Jack Collins Speaker of the General Assembly Mr. Albert Porroni Executive Director Office of Legislative Services Enclosed is our report on the audit of the Judiciary, Administrative Office of the Courts, Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex Vicinage for the period July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000. If you would like a personal briefing, please call me at (609) 292-3700. October 18, 2000 JUDICIARY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MIDDLESEX VICINAGE Table of Contents Page Scope ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • About the Superior Court of California, County of Orange
    ABOUT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE The Superior Court is a unified state trial court serving the County of Orange. The court has eight locations and hears all matters in criminal, traffic, civil, probate, juvenile, family law, and mental health cases. The court also operates drug courts, DUI courts, a veteran’s court, a mental health court, a homeless court, and a Laura’s Law court. There are no limited jurisdiction courts in the county. Parking tickets are handled by the issuing agency (city, county, school, or special district, etc.). The population of the county is more than three million residents, larger than 21 states. As such, the court is one of the largest state trial courts in the country. There are currently 144 judicial positions authorized – 124 judges and 20 commissioners. The judges serve six-year terms and are either appointed by the Governor to a vacancy or elected. Commissioners are appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the court. The court as an organization is largely self-contained. The court operates its own personnel system, information technology systems (case management, document management, and jury management, as well as all the associated hardware and software), accounting and trust functions, procurement, fine collection and distribution, and facilities maintenance, as well as supporting all aspects of the trial courts. Trial court support includes: clerk of court, records and exhibit management, jury, court reporters, interpreters, pretrial services, child custody mediators, probate investigators, problem-solving courts, self-help centers, and the Grand Jury. ACCOMPLISHMENTS The court is proactively managed and technologically one of the most advanced courts in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA COUNTY of LOS ANGELES -Vii- CHAPTER Three CIVIL DIVISION RULES 43 3.1 APPLICABILITY
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER Three CIVIL DIVISION RULES 43 3.1 APPLICABILITY ...........................................................................................43 GENERAL PROVISIONS ..............................................................43 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES ...........................................................................43 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES .....................................43 (a) Proportionate Assignment .....................................................................43 (b) Regulation of Case Assignment ............................................................43 (c) Notice of Case Assignment ...................................................................43 (d) Improper Refiling ..................................................................................43 (e) Duty of Counsel .....................................................................................43 (f) Related Cases .........................................................................................44 (g) Consolidation of Cases ..........................................................................44 (h) Coordination of Non-Complex Cases ....................................................44 (i) Assignment for All Purposes .................................................................44 (j) Effect of Judge Unavailability ...............................................................45 (k) Complex Litigation ................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Louisiana
    SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA REPORT To The L O U I S I A N A L E G I S L A T U R E In Response To HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 143 OF THE 2011 REGULAR LEGISLATIVE SESSION FEBRUARY 14, 2014 HCR143(2011)-0001 C O N T E N T S Page No. I. Introduction and Background 1 II. The Supreme Court House Concurrent Resolution 2 143 Committee III. Activities of the Judicial Council and the Trial Court 4 Committee on Judgeships IV. Consultation with the National Center for State Courts 6 V. The Courts of Appeal 7 VI. The District Courts 17 VII. The City Courts 33 VIII. Conclusion 45 Exhibits: 1. House Concurrent Resolution 143 2. Supreme Court House Concurrent Resolution 143 Committee Roster 3. National Center for State Courts: Presentation on Weighted Caseload/Workload Assessment (January 23, 2104) 4. National Center for State Courts Report: Development of Appellate Court Work Point Values & Examination of Case Complexity (October 2012) 5. National Center for State Courts Report: An Assessment of Louisiana’s Judicial Workload Model (January 2014) 6. Appellate Court Profiles and Workload Data, 2002-2012 7. Appellate Court Work Point Values Project: Project Summary and Recommendations (October 2012) 8. District Court Profiles and Workload Data, 2002-2012 9. City Court Profiles and Workload Data, 2002-2012 HCR143(2011)-0002 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA Report in Response to House Concurrent Resolution 143 (2011 - Representative Rosalind Jones) * * * I. Introduction and Background House Concurrent Resolution 143 (hereinafter HCR 143) requested that the Supreme Court … “conduct a comprehensive study of the caseload data and the number of judges of each appellate court, district court, parish court, and city court in Louisiana to determine changes necessary to the existing structure of the judiciary to provide the most efficient use of judicial resources…” The resolution further requested that the Court consider case filing data, case weights, court structure and finance, and the use of support personnel in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Court System
    Georgia’s Court System The Georgia court system has six classes of trial-level courts: the superior, state, juvenile, probate, magistrate, and municipal courts. There are two appellate-level courts: the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. The mission of the juvenile courts is to Trial Courts of assist and protect children in securing their Courts of Review moral, emotional, mental, and physical General Jurisdiction welfare as well as the safety of both the child and community. It is the intent of the Supreme Court of Georgia courts that the necessary care, guidance, The Supreme Court of Georgia, the state’s and control occur in the child’s own home, highest court, reviews decisions made by Superior Court with a focus on community-based programs, other courts in civil and criminal cases. This instead of detention centers. The superior court exercises broad civil and court alone rules on questions involving the Juvenile court judges are appointed by the criminal jurisdiction. Superior court judges constitutionality of state statutes, all criminal superior court judges of the circuit, unless preside over all felony trials, have exclusive cases involving a sentence of death, and peti- local law provides for elections. jurisdiction over divorces and may correct tions from decisions of the Court of Appeals. errors made by limited jurisdiction courts. No trials are held at the appellate level; oral The forty-nine superior court circuits in arguments are heard by the entire court. Georgia are made up of one or more coun- Probate Court Each case accepted for review by the Su- ties; each circuit has a chief superior court Original jurisdiction in the probate of wills preme Court is assigned to one of the nine judge and other judges as authorized by the and administration of decedents’ estates justices for preparation of a preliminary General Assembly.
    [Show full text]