Practice Book

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Practice Book OFFICIAL 2021 CONNECTICUT PRACTICE BOOK (Revision of 1998) CONTAINING RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT RULES FOR THE SUPERIOR COURT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE APPENDIX OF FORMS NOTICE REGARDING OFFICIAL JUDICIAL BRANCH FORMS APPENDIX OF SECTION 1-9B CHANGES Published by The Commission on Official Legal Publications Copyrighted by the Secretary of the State of the State of Connecticut 2021 by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut Copyrighted by the Secretary of the State of the State of Connecticut EXPLANATORY NOTES The Superior Court Rules as organized herein were first published in the Connecticut Law Journal dated July 29, 1997. This 2021 edition of the Practice Book contains amendments to the Rules of Professional Conduct, the Superior Court Rules and the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The amendments were published in the Connecticut Law Journals dated February 11, 2020, July 14, 2020, and August 4, 2020. The system used to number each section is based on the chapter in which the section is located. Each section has a two part number. The first part of the number designates the chap- ter, and the second part designates the number of the section within that chapter. (Chapter 1 begins with 1-1, chapter 2 with 2-1, etc.) The internal breakdown of individual rules follows the style of the General Statutes. Subsections are designated by lower case letters in paren- theses, (a), (b), subdivisions are designated by numbers in parentheses, (1), (2), and subpara- graphs are designated by upper case letters in parentheses, (A), (B). Origin of the rules. A parenthetical notation about the origin of each rule is found at the end of every section in this volume. The notation (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. ) indicates the number of the section in the 1978-1997 Practice Book corresponding to the current section. Current numbers of any sections corresponding to the sections in the 1978-1997 Practice Book appear in the Reference Tables following the text of the rules. The notation (1998) indicates that the section was new in the 1998 Practice Book, taking effect October 1, 1997. The notation (See P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. ) (1998) indicates that the section was modeled on a rule in the 1978-1997 Practice Book but was actually adopted for the first time to take effect October 1, 1997. There may be significant differences between the rules in this volume and those in the 1978-1997 Practice Book on which they were modeled. The temporary num- bers assigned to those rules in the July 29, 1997 Connecticut Law Journal, where they were originally published, appear in the Reference Tables following the text of the rules. When a section was adopted or amended after 1997, a parenthetical notation to that effect appears either immediately following the text of the section or following the parenthetical nota- tion concerning the derivation of the section. When the title to a section has been amended, a parenthetical notation appears immediately following the title. Histories and commentaries. Histories describing the nature of amendments and Com- mentaries indicating the intended purpose of new rules or amendments to existing rules are printed following the text of new or amended rules. Histories and Commentaries are included for only those rules that were adopted or amended to take effect in the year corresponding to the current edition of the Practice Book, with the following exceptions: (1) the Histories and Commentaries to the rules on sealing of files and closure of the courtroom will be retained on a cumulative basis; (2) the 2014 Commentary to Section 1-10B and the 2017 Commentary to Section 2-27A have been retained; and (3) Commentaries to certain sections of the Rules of Appellate Procedure have been retained. Users wanting to access the Histories documenting rule changes and Commentaries to new or amended rules, in a given year, should not discard the corresponding edition of the Practice Book. For example, Histories and Commentaries corresponding to rule changes to take effect January 1, 2021, will appear only in the 2021 edition of the Practice Book and not in subsequent editions, unless the rule falls into one of the exceptions, listed previously. The Commentaries to the rules of practice are included in this volume for informational purposes only. Commentaries to those rules are not adopted by the Judges and Justices when they vote to adopt proposed rule changes. Commentaries to the Rules of Professional Conduct and Code of Judicial Conduct are adopted by the Judges and Justices and are printed in every edition of the Practice Book. iii Copyrighted by the Secretary of the State of the State of Connecticut Beginning in 2000, Amendment Notes were incorporated into the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Judicial Conduct. Those notes, approved by the Rules Committee of the Superior Court to explain the revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct and Code of Judicial Conduct, appear only in the edition of the Practice Book corresponding to the year of the revision and not in subsequent editions. Every year, certain nonsubstantive, technical editorial changes are made to a number of the rules. Some, but not all, of these changes are explained in Technical Change notes. The Rules of Appellate Procedure. The reorganization of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in 1998 was completed subsequent to the publication of the July 29, 1997 Connecticut Law Journal and was published in this volume for the first time in 1998. The goal in reorganiz- ing the Rules of Appellate Procedure was to present them in the order in which an appellant might approach the appeal process, i.e., rules on whether to appeal, how to file, what to do next, when argument will take place, opinions and reargument. Rules on various special pro- ceedings were organized into separate chapters. No substantive changes were made in the course of reorganization, but there were editorial changes. Juvenile matters. Effective January 1, 2003, the rules pertaining to procedure in juvenile matters were amended and reorganized. The amendments initially were published in the Connecticut Law Journal of July 23, 2002. The July 23, 2002 Connecticut Law Journal gave notice that the rules on juvenile matters, which, since 1998, had been found in chapters 26 through 35, had been moved to chapters 26a through 35a. In the Practice Book itself, however, the original numbers of the juvenile rules were retained whenever possible. Appendices and notices. In 2002, an Appendix was added following the Index. The Appen- dix contains certain forms that previously had been in Volume 2 of the 1978-1997 Practice Book. The Appendix of Superior Court Standing Orders, which was added in 2010, was removed in 2012. A notice referring the reader to the Judicial Branch website for access to the Superior Court Standing Orders was substituted in its place. The Index of Official Judicial Branch Forms Used in Civil, Family and Juvenile Matters, which was added in 2010, was removed in 2018. A notice referring the reader to the Judicial Branch website for access to official Judicial Branch forms was substituted in its place. In 2021, a temporary appendix was added noting various changes enacted by the Rules Committee of the Superior Court, and subsequently adopted by the judges of the Superior Court, pursuant to Section 1-9B, in response to the public health emergency and the civil preparedness emergency initially declared by Governor Lamont on March 10, 2020, and then renewed by him on September 1, 2020. Subsequent changes may be adopted. Refer to www.jud.ct.gov, www.jud.ct.gov/COVID19.htm, and www.jud.ct.gov/pb.htm for updates. iv Copyrighted by the Secretary of the State of the State of Connecticut TABLE OF CONTENTS Attorney’s Oath ............................................. 1 Rules of Professional Conduct Preamble................................................. 1 Scope .................................................. 2 Rules and Commentaries ....................................... 4 Code of Judicial Conduct Preamble................................................. 65 Scope .................................................. 65 Terminology ............................................... 66 Application ................................................ 67 Canons, Rules and Comments .................................... 68 Superior Court Rules and Rules of Appellate Procedure Chapter and Section Headings of the Rules ............................. 82 Superior Court—General Provisions Chapter 1 Scope of Rules ....................................... 103 Chapter 2 Attorneys........................................... 113 Chapter 3 Appearances ........................................ 166 Chapter 4 Pleadings .......................................... 172 Chapter 5 Trials ............................................. 175 Chapter 6 Judgments .......................................... 177 Chapter 7 Clerks; Files and Records ................................. 179 Superior Court—Procedure in Civil Matters Chapter 8 Commencement of Action ................................. 185 Chapter 9 Parties ............................................ 187 Chapter 10 Pleadings.......................................... 193 Chapter 11 Motions, Requests, Orders of Notice, and Short Calendar .............. 205 Chapter 12 Transfer of Actions .................................... 214 Chapter 13 Discovery and Depositions ................................ 215 Chapter 14 Dockets, Trial Lists, Pretrials and Assignment Lists
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Judicial Branch
    ’s Legislator Guide to the Judicial Branch January 2007 2 Table of Contents Georgia’s Court System . .4 Supreme Court . .5 Court of Appeals . .7 Superior Court . .8 State Court . .8 Juvenile Court . .9 Probate Court . .10 Magistrate Court . .11 Municipal Court . .11 Georgia Court System (with appellate routes) . .12 Judicial Circuit Map . .13 Judicial Council of Georgia . .14 Judicial Council Budget Developments . .15 Judicial Council Programs . .16 Judicial Council Commissions and Committees . .18 Judge’s Councils . .23 Council of Superior Court Judges . .23 Council of State Court Judges . .24 Council of Juvenile Court Judges . .25 Council of Probate Court Judges . .26 Council of Magistrate Court Judges . .27 Council of Municipal Court Judges . .28 Georgia’s Accountability Courts . .29 Administrative Office of the Courts . .31 3 Georgia's Court System felony offenses, divorce cases and open, independent, n civil matters involving corporations. impartial court system pre- The appellate courts review records serves the fundamental of cases tried in limited and general rights of citizens. Almost all citizens jurisdiction courts to determine if willA come in contact with a court at procedural errors or errors of law that some point in their lives: could have altered the outcome of • to report for jury duty the case were made at trial. The • to settle a traffic ticket Supreme Court of Georgia is the • to testify in court final appellate court in Georgia. • to settle a lawsuit • to probate a family member’s will Managing today’s court operations • to adopt a child requires the expertise of many profes- • to get a divorce, request child sup- sionals other than judges.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2 8 2019
    Case 3:17-cv-01127-WQH-KSC Document 142 Filed 05/28/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 50 1 FILED 2 MAY 2 8 2019 3 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTi'lcRN DISi'RICT OF ~)~1.IFORNIA 4 B'f _0:!:. OEP~!JY. 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH J. MOSER, individually, and Case No.: 17cvl 127-WQH(KSC) --~ _ on behalf of all others similarl:x situated,,_.1_________________ 1 __ 12 ORDER RE JOINT MOTION FOR Plaintiff, 13 DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY v. DISPUTE RE INTERROGATORIES 14 AND DOCUMENT REQUESTS HEALTH INSURANCE 15 SERVED ON PLAINTIFF BY INNOVATIONS, INC., a Delaware DEFENDANT DONIS! JAX, INC. 16 corporation, et al., 17 Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 97 and 98.] 18 19 20 Before the Court are: (1) a 76-page Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery 21 Dispute [Doc. No. 97] addressing interrogatories served on plaintiff by defendant Donisi 22 Jax, Inc.; and (2) a 151-page Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute 23 addressing document requests served on plaintiff by defendant Donisi Jax, Inc. [Doc. No. 24 98.] In these two Joint Motions, defendant Donisi Jax, Inc. seeks an order compelling 25 plaintiff to provide further, substantive responses to certain interrogatories and document 26 requests. The subject interrogatories and documents requests at issue are interrelated as 27 they seek documents and information on the same topics. These two Motions are the fifth 28 and sixth discovery disputes in this case [Doc. Nos. 75, 83, 84, 87, 99, 100, 101, 102, 118], I .
    [Show full text]
  • Court Reform, Texas Style
    SMU Law Review Volume 21 Issue 2 Article 3 1967 Court Reform, Texas Style Clarence A. Guittard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Clarence A. Guittard, Court Reform, Texas Style, 21 SW L.J. 451 (1967) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol21/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. COURT REFORM, TEXAS STYLE by Clarence A. Guittard* R EFORM of the judiciary has been a perennial theme among Texas lawyers. In July, 1918, the Texas Bar Association, meeting at Wich- ita Falls, heard an address by Roscoe Pound on "Judicial Organization"' and adopted the report of a special committee proposing to replace article V of the Constitution of 1876 with a judicial article that would be con- sidered advanced, even by the standards of 1967. The proposal embodied the principles of unification, flexibility of jurisdiction and assignment of judicial personnel, and responsible supervision of the entire system by the supreme court, all as recommended by Pound.! In support of this proposal, the association published a pamphlet point- ing out the need for judicial reform in emphatic terms: The public is in open rebellion. The best of our judges, working in the present machine, cannot always administer justice. The rightful compen- sation of lawyers is enormously decreased, their labors increased, by the intolerable expense, complication, delays and uncertainties inherent in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurse Leadership
    NURSE LEADERSHIP Developing the Workforce of the Future SPONSORED BY: THE PATH FORWARD... Investing in nurse education and development is critical for hospitals and health systems to successfully transition to value-based care. Nurses are in a position to not only partici- pate in, but lead the transformation of the health care delivery system to one that is focused on team-based, patient-centered care across the continuum. This transformation will require new skills and enhanced knowledge around population health, wellness and data analytics, among other things. This executive dialogue explores the nursing workforce of the future, including the necessary composition and distribution of the nursing workforce. It examines the nursing supply chain and what is needed to educate and retain a suf- ficient workforce; how health care provider organizations can recognize, support and train nurse leaders; and the barriers to nurse advancement. 2 EXECUTIVE DIALOGUE | Sponsored by Walden University | 2019 PANELISTS ▶ Donna Frazier, R.N. CHIEF NURSING OFFICER THE PANELISTS MERCY HOSPITAL SOUTH ST. LOUIS, MO. ▶ Lisa Gossett, R.N. SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF NURSING EXECUTIVE OHIOHEALTH, COLUMBUS, OHIO ▶ Julie Lindeman-Read, R.N. SENIOR DIRECTOR, NURSING PRACTICE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP KAISER PERMANENTE NATIONAL PATIENT CARE SERVICES, FREMONT, CALIF. ▶ Betsy Patterson, R.N. VICE PRESIDENT & REGIONAL CHIEF NURSE EXECUTIVE OFFICER BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE, HILL COUNTRY REGION LEANDER, TEXAS ▶ Jan Phillips, D.N.P., R.N. CHIEF NURSING EXECUTIVE CENTRAL CAROLINA HOSPITAL, SANFORD, N.C. ▶ George Zangaro, Ph.D., R.N. ASSOCIATE DEAN SCHOOL OF NURSING WALDEN UNIVERSITY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. MODERATOR ▶ Lee Ann Jarousse SENIOR EDITOR, AHA CENTER FOR HEALTH INNOVATION AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, CHICAGO 3 EXECUTIVE DIALOGUE | Sponsored by Walden University | 2019 NURSE LEADERSHIP | Developing the Workforce of the Future MODERATOR (Lee Ann Jarousse, American Hospital to offer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shadow Rules of Joinder
    Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship 2012 The hS adow Rules of Joinder Robin Effron Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation 100 Geo. L. J. 759 (2011-2012) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. The Shadow Rules of Joinder ROBIN J. EFFRON* The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide litigants with procedural devices for joining claims and parties. Several of these rules demand that the claims or parties share a baseline of commonality, either in the form of the same "transactionor occurrence" or a "common question of law or fact." Both phrases have proved to be notoriously tricky in application.Commentators from the academy and the judiciary have attributed these difficulties to the context- specific and discretionary nature of the rules. This Article challenges that wisdom by suggesting that the doctrinal confu- sion can be attributed to deeper theoretical divisions in the judiciary, particu- larly with regardto the role of the ontological categories of "fact" and "law." These theoretical divisions have led lower courtjudges to craft shadow rules of joinder "Redescription" is the rule by which judges utilize a perceived law-fact distinction to characterizea set of facts as falling inside or outside a definition of commonality. "Impliedpredominance" is the rule in which judges have taken the Rule 23(b)(3) class action standard that common questions predominate over individual issues and applied it to other rules of joinder that do not have this express requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • DISC-001 Form Interrogatories
    DISC-001 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SHORT TITLE OF CASE: FORM INTERROGATORIES—GENERAL CASE NUMBER: Asking Party: Answering Party: Set No.: Sec. 1. Instructions to All Parties (c) Each answer must be as complete and straightforward as (a) Interrogatories are written questions prepared by a party to an the information reasonably available to you, including the action that are sent to any other party in the action to be information possessed by your attorneys or agents, permits. answered under oath. The interrogatories below are form If an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, answer it interrogatories approved for use in civil cases. to the extent possible. (b) For time limitations, requirements for service on other parties, (d) If you do not have enough personal knowledge to fully and other details, see Code of Civil Procedure sections answer an interrogatory, say so, but make a reasonable and 2030.010–2030.410 and the cases construing those sections. good faith effort to get the information by asking other (c) These form interrogatories do not change existing law persons or organizations, unless the information is equally relating to interrogatories nor do they affect an answering available to the asking party. party’s right to assert any privilege or make any objection. (e) Whenever an interrogatory may be answered by referring to Sec. 2. Instructions to the Asking Party a document, the document may be attached as an exhibit to (a) These interrogatories are designed for optional use by parties the response and referred to in the response.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Court Filing Fees
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. PURPOSES AND USES OF FEES Survey and The use of filing fees in this country had it.. origin in the English tradition of Analysis of compensating court officials from fees charged to litigants.s Since state and local governments started paying the Court Filing Fees salaries of judges and court clerks, how­ ever, two other justifications for the By E. Keith Stott. Jr., lind Richard N. Ross use of filing fees have been emphasized. III late 1975 tile National Cel/ter sta.!! Although the extent of judicial par­ The first is that filing fees deter frivo­ prepared a study of court }fling fees for ticipation in shaping the social order lous litigation, thereby controlling court tlte Missouri o'{lice of State Courts Ad­ and resolving private disputes has caseloads. Recent research has shown, ministrator. The study. a part oJ' a greatly increased during the past few however, that filing fees do not deter larger project to determine tile extent decades, adequate financing of state litigation because they are only a small alld <tI.Tect of court costs on litigatioJl. court opel'ations has never become a part of the overall cost of litigation. produced some illterestillg alld us<;jitl reality. Judges and court administrators Other court costs and expenses related iI{/'ormatioll that otller courts have sillce have engaged in difficult and frequently to litigation have a more important im­ requestedfor similar studies or projects unsuccessful competitions in the budget pact on the decision to file a lawsuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern Criminal Federal Jury Instructions for the Seventh Circuit
    Pattern Criminal Federal Jury Instructions for the Seventh Circuit The Committee on Federal Criminal Jury Instructions for the Seventh Circuit drafted these proposed pattern jury instructions. The Seventh Circuit Judicial Council, on November 30, 1998, approved these instructions in principle and authorized their publication for use in the Seventh Circuit. The Judicial Council wishes to express its gratitude to the judges and lawyers who have worked so long and hard to make a contribution to our system of criminal justice. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY INSTRUCTIONS ............................................1 1.01 THE FUNCTIONS OF THE COURT AND THE JURY ........................2 1.02 THE EVIDENCE ..................................................3 1.03 TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES (DECIDING WHAT TO BELIEVE) ......4 1.04 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE-INFERENCES .........................5 1.05 DEFINITION OF “DIRECT” AND “CIRCUMSTANTIAL” EVIDENCE ...6 1.06 WHAT IS NOT EVIDENCE .........................................7 1.07 ATTORNEY INTERVIEWING WITNESS ............................8 1.08 PARTY OTHER THAN AN INDIVIDUAL ............................9 1.09 NUMBER OF WITNESSES ........................................10 1.10 REMINDER OF VOIR DIRE OBLIGATIONS ........................11 2.01 THE CHARGE - THE INDICTMENT .....................................12 2.02 LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE ....................................13 2.03 PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE - BURDEN OF PROOF .............15 2.04 DEFINITION OF REASONABLE DOUBT ...........................16 2.05
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Jackson the Perform a N C
    MICHAEL JACKSON 101 THE PERFORMANCES MICHAEL JACKSON 101 THE PERFORMANCES &E Andy Healy MICHAEL JACKSON 101 THE PERFORMANCES . Andy Healy 2016 Michael gave the world a wealth of music. Songs that would become a part of our collective sound track. Under the Creative Commons licence you are free to share, copy, distribute and transmit this work with the proviso that the work not be altered in any way, shape or form and that all And for that the 101 series is dedicated to Michael written works are credited to Andy Healy as author. This Creative Commons licence does not and all the musicians and producers who brought the music to life. extend to the copyrights held by the photographers and their respective works. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. This special Performances supplement is also dedicated to the choreographers, dancers, directors and musicians who helped realise Michael’s vision. I do not claim any ownership of the photographs featured and all rights reside with the original copyright holders. Images are used under the Fair Use Act and do not intend to infringe on the copyright holders. By a fan for the fans. &E 101 hat makes a great performance? Is it one that delivers a wow factor? W One that stays with an audience long after the houselights have come on? One that stands the test of time? Is it one that signifies a time and place? A turning point in a career? Or simply one that never fails to give you goose bumps and leave you in awe? Michael Jackson was, without doubt, the consummate performer.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Jackson's Gesamtkunstwerk
    Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 11, No. 5 (November 2015) Michael Jackson’s Gesamtkunstwerk: Artistic Interrelation, Immersion, and Interactivity From the Studio to the Stadium Sylvia J. Martin Michael Jackson produced art in its most total sense. Throughout his forty-year career Jackson merged art forms, melded genres and styles, and promoted an ethos of unity in his work. Jackson’s mastery of combined song and dance is generally acknowledged as the hallmark of his performance. Scholars have not- ed Jackson’s place in the lengthy soul tradition of enmeshed movement and mu- sic (Mercer 39; Neal 2012) with musicologist Jacqueline Warwick describing Jackson as “embodied musicality” (Warwick 249). Jackson’s colleagues have also attested that even when off-stage and off-camera, singing and dancing were frequently inseparable for Jackson. James Ingram, co-songwriter of the Thriller album hit “PYT,” was astonished when he observed Jackson burst into dance moves while recording that song, since in Ingram’s studio experience singers typically conserve their breath for recording (Smiley). Similarly, Bruce Swedien, Jackson’s longtime studio recording engineer, told National Public Radio, “Re- cording [with Jackson] was never a static event. We used to record with the lights out in the studio, and I had him on my drum platform. Michael would dance on that as he did the vocals” (Swedien ix-x). Surveying his life-long body of work, Jackson’s creative capacities, in fact, encompassed acting, directing, producing, staging, and design as well as lyri- cism, music composition, dance, and choreography—and many of these across genres (Brackett 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers
    California Bar Examination Essay Questions and Selected Answers July 2018 The State Bar Of California Committee of Bar Examiners/Office of Admissions 180 Howard Street • San Francisco, CA 94105-1639 • (415) 538-2300 845 S. Figueroa Street • Los Angeles, CA 90017-2515 • (213) 765-1500 ESSAY QUESTIONS AND SELECTED ANSWERS JULY 2018 CALIFORNIA BAR EXAMINATION This publication contains the five essay questions from the July 2018 California Bar Examination and two selected answers for each question. The answers were assigned high grades and were written by applicants who passed the examination after one read. The answers were produced as submitted by the applicant, except that minor corrections in spelling and punctuation were made for ease in reading. They are reproduced here with the consent of the authors. Question Number Subject 1. Contracts 2. Evidence 3. Professional Responsibility 4. Community Property 5. Constitutional Law ESSAY EXAMINATION INSTRUCTIONS Your answer should demonstrate your ability to analyze the facts in the question, to tell the difference between material facts and immaterial facts, and to discern the points of law and fact upon which the case turns. Your answer should show that you know and understand the pertinent principles and theories of law, their qualifications and limitations, and their relationships to each other. Your answer should evidence your ability to apply the law to the given facts and to reason in a logical, lawyer-like manner from the premises you adopt to a sound conclusion. Do not merely show that you remember legal principles. Instead, try to demonstrate your proficiency in using and applying them.
    [Show full text]
  • Defences, Mitigation and Criminal Responsibility
    Chapter 12 Defences, mitigation and criminal responsibility Page Index 1-12-1 Introduction 1-12-2 Part 1 - Defences 1-12-3 General defences 1-12-4 Intoxication/drunkenness due to drugs/alcohol 1-12-4 Self defence 1-12-4 Use of force in prevention of crime 1-12-5 Mistake 1-12-5 Duress 1-12-6 Necessity 1-12-6 Insanity 1-12-6 Automatism 1-12-6 Other defences 1-12-7 Provocation 1-12-7 Alibi 1-12-7 Diminished responsibility 1-12-7 Consent 1-12-7 Superior orders 1-12-7 Part 2 - Mitigation 1-12-9 Part 3 - Criminal responsibility 1-12-10 Intention 1-12-10 Recklessness 1-12-10 Negligence 1-12-10 Lawful excuse or reasonable excuse – the burden of proof 1-12-11 Evidential burden 1-12-11 Lawful excuse 1-12-11 Reasonable excuse 1-12-11 JSP 830 MSL Version 2.0 1-12-1 AL42 35 Chapter 12 Defences, mitigation and criminal responsibility Introduction 1. This chapter is divided into three parts: a. Part 1 - Defences (paragraphs 4 - 28); b. Part 2 - Mitigation (paragraphs 29 - 31); and c. Part 3 - Criminal responsibility (paragraphs 32 - 44). 2. This chapter provides guidance on these matters to those involved in the administration of Service discipline at unit level. Related chapters are Chapter 9 (Summary hearing and activation of suspended sentences of Service detention), Chapter 6 (Investigation, charging and mode of trial), and Chapter 11 (Summary hearing - dealing with evidence). 3. This is not a detailed analysis of the law on the most common defences likely to be put forward by an accused, but when read in conjunction with the chapters mentioned above, should provide enough information for straightforward cases to be dealt with and ensure that staffs can identify when a case should be referred for Court Martial (CM) trial.
    [Show full text]