DOCSLIB.ORG

State Voters' Pamphlet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Voters' Pamphlet STATE OF OREGON General Election November 8, 1966 Compiled and Distributed by TOM McCALL Secretary of State INFORMATION FOR VOTERS (1) Requirements for a citizen to You are physically unable qualify as a voter: to go to the polls. Citizen of the United States. Application for the ballot may be Twenty-one or more years of age. filed with, or mailed to the Resided in the state at least six County Clerk at any time with­ months. in 60 days before the General Able to read and write English. election, September 9-Novem­ Registered as an elector with the ber· 7 (Service voters, after County Clerk or official regis­ January 1 of election year). trar at least 30 days before Application includes: election. Your signature. (2) Voting by absentee ballot. Address or precinct number. You may apply for an absentee Statement of reason for ap- ballot if: plication. You are a registered voter. Applications filed less than five ("Service voters" are auto­ days before election, Novem­ matically registered by fol­ ber 3-7, require additional lowing the service voting statement that: procedure.) Voter is physically unable to You have reason to believe get to the polls, or you will be absent from Voter was unexpectedly your county on election called out of the county in day. the five-day period. You live more than 15 miles Emergencies on Election Day: from your polling place. Physical disability must be You are unable by reason of certified by licensed practi­ physical disability to go to tioner of healing arts or the polls. authorized Christian Science You are a "service voter". practitioner. Involuntary You are a · "service voter" public services such as fire­ if you are: fighting to be certified by In the Armed Forces or person in charge. Merchant Marine of the Ballot, when voted by elector, United States. must be returned to County A civilian employee of the Clerk not later than 8 p.m. on United States, serving election day. outside the country. (3) A voter may obtain from his A member of a religious County Clerk a certificate of group or welfare agency registration if he: assisting members of the Changes residence within his Armed Forces. precinct, county or to another A spouse and dependents of county within 60 days prior to a "service voter" who the ensuin~ election and has have been Oregon resi­ not reregistered. (Certificate is dents and are tempo­ presented to his election board.) rarily living outside the Is absent from his county on elec­ county in which the last tion day. (Certificate may be home residence in this presented to the election board state of the "service in any county in the state. voter" is located. Elector may vote only for state How a voter may obtain and use and district offices.) an absentee ballot. You may apply for an ab- (4) A voter is required to reregister sentee ballot if: if he: You will be. temporarily Changes address by moving absent from your county within his precinct or moving on election day. to another precinct or county. You live more than 15 miles Changes party registration. from your polling place. Changes name. (See back of book for list of candidates) Official Voters' Pamphlet GeneraZ EZection, November 8, 1966 5 6. Official Voters' Pamphlet Measure No. 1 Public Transportation System Employes Constitutional Amendment Proposed 1by the Fifty-third Legislative Assembly by House Joint Reso­ lution No. 13, filed in the office of the Secretary of State on May 18, 1005, and referred to the people as provided by Section 1, Article XVII of the Constitution. Explanation By Committee Designated Pursuant to ORS 254.210 Under present Oregon Lew certain rights and benefits, particularly those falling in the area of pensions, earned by .employes working for private transit systems, would be jeopardized or destroyed by transfer of that system to public ownership or control. In some drcumstances the public agency would be without authority to protect those rights. Measure No. 1 requires public agencies rto "make fair and equitable atrangements to protect the interests of employes and retired employes" affected by the assumption of responsibility for operation of a public trans­ portation system by a governmental agency or subdivision. The measure authorizes the governmental body to make such arrangements as "may be necessary for the preservation of rights, privileges and benefits" which were .. in existence at the time of the take-over by the governmental agency. The measure would make possible the acquisition or assumption of responsibility for operation of public transportation systems by public agen­ cies· or municipal corporations without penalty to current employes or retired employes receiving pensions from those systems. The mea·sure would also bring the State of Oregon into compliance with a requirement of the Federal Mass Transportation Act of 1964 which provides as a condition of federal assistance to cities, counties and states for modern­ ization, expansion, or other improvements in their mass transportation facilities and services, that "It shall be a condition of any assistance under this Act that fair and equitable arrangements are made . to protect the interests of employes affected by such assistance." Such federal assistance may amount to two-thirds of the financing required to underwrite a transportation improvement program. Federal aid is available to governmental agencies, not only for transportation sys­ . terns operated by those agencies, but also when applying for such funds on behalf of a private carrier. Measure No. 1 does not transfer or require the transfer of ownership or control of private transportation systems to public agencies. It provides that, should such a transfer become necessary or advisable to meet the needs of the future, employes of affected transportation systems will be protected. GEORGE J. ANNALA, Hood River WILLIAM F. LUBERSKY, Portland MELVIN W. SCHOPPERT, Portland General Election, November 8, 1966 7 Measure No. 1 Public Transportation System Employes Constitutional Amendment Argument in Favor Submitted by Legislative Committee provided by Subsection (3) of ORS 255.421 The eonstitution of Oregon does not presently provide for the continuation of pension plans, job benefits, etc .. of transit employees whose transportation systems may be taken over by public agencies. Unless its statutes are amended, the rights of deserving employees and pensioners in such cases would be put in jeopardy, and the ability of our state to develop its metro­ politan and inter-city transit systems to meet the needs of the future will be hampered. Recognizing this situation, the 1965 Legislature passed a bill (by a 25-0 vote in the Senate and a 50-7 margin in the House) to refer to the people this constitutional amendment. It will require that public bodies taking over any public transportation system protect the pension rights and job benefits of all existing and retired employees of the old system. THIS MEASURE DOES NOT PROVIDE NEW BENEFITS FOR TRANSIT EMPLOYEES, NOR DOES IT TRANSFER THE OPERATIONS OF PRIVATE CARRIERS TO PUBLIC AGENCIES. The purpose of the measure is simply to make it possible for such a changeover to be effected should it be in the public interest to do so. With the population growth and mounting complexity of urban areas, it has be­ eome increasingly more diffkult for private carriers to expand their services and still maintain economical rate structures. The trend in most American metropolises is toward public subsidization or outright assumption of the responsibility to provide economical, efficient mass transportation service. Oregon should be prepared to meet this trend, without, at the same time, penalizing private carriers which can meet the demands of the future. PASSAGE OF MEASURE NO. 1 IS ESSENTIAL IF OREGON IS TO QUALIFY FOR FEDERAL MASS TRANSPORTATION AID FUNDS. The Federal Mass Transportation Act of 1964 provides for millions of dollars in federal aid funds to help cities, counties and states modernize and improve their mass transportation fadlities and servkes. However, a key provision of this Act is that "fair and equitable arrangements are made . to protect the interests of employees affected by such assistance." This means that-if local or state government is to qualify for such federal aid-it must insure that existing employee pensi'On rights, etc. are not jeopardized by the changeover from private to public control. The same applies for a public agency or political sub-division that requests aid on behalf of a PRIVATE CARRIER. Since Oregon taxpayers contribute to this federal aid program, they should have an interest in seeing that our state can share in its benefits-up to two­ thirds of the cost of a modernization or improvement program. MEASURE NO.1 PAVES THE WAY FOR SUCH ASSISTANCE-AND ITS RESULTING SAVINGS TO OREGON TAXPAYERS. VOTE #1 YES TO: e PROTECT THE EXISTING RIGHTS OF TRANSIT EMPLOYEES e PROVIDE IMPROVED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICE FOR THE FUTURE e PERMIT OREGON TO SHARE IN FEDERAL AID FUNDS SENATOR VICTOR G. ATIYEH REPRESENTATIVE ROBERT F. SMITH REPRESENTATIVE EDWARD J. WHELAN 8 Official Voters' Pamphlet Measure No. 1 PUblic Transportation System Employes Constitutional Amendment Argument in Favor Submitted by the Citizens Committee for Improved Transportation VOTE NO. 1 YES TO PROTECT TRANSIT EMPLOYEES' PENSIONS The 1965 Legislature voted overwhelmingly to refer to the people this measure to assure transit employees and deserving pensioners fair treatment in regard to pension rights, job benefits, etc. should their transportation systems be taken over by· public agencies. THIS MEASURE DOES NOT TRANSFER THE OWNERSHIP OR CON­ TROL OF PRIVATE CARRIERS TO PUBLIC AGENCIES-NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. It simply provides that where such a change becomes necessary-in order to provide efficient public service-the rights of active and retired employees will be protected.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EDITH GREEN–WENDELL WYATT FEDERAL BUILDING Portland, Oregon Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building in Portland, Oregon, Was Renovated Under the U.S
    EDITH GREEN–WENDELL WYATT FEDERAL BUILDING Portland, Oregon Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building in Portland, Oregon, was renovated under the U.S. General Services Administration’s Design Excellence Program, an initiative to create and preserve outstanding public buildings that will be used and enjoyed now and by future generations of Americans. April 2017 EDITH GREEN–WENDELL WYATT FEDERAL BUILDING Portland, Oregon 6 Origins of Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building 10 Preparing for Modernization 16 EGWW’s Mutually Reinforcing Solutions 24 The Portfolio Perspective 28 EGWW’s Arts Legacy 32 The Design and Construction Team 39 U.S. General Services Administration and the Design Excellence Program 2 Each facade is attuned to daylight angles; the entire solution is based on the way the sun moves around the building. Donald Eggleston Principal, SERA 3 4 5 ORIGINS OF EDITH GREEN-WENDELL WYATT FEDERAL BUILDING At the start of the Great Depression, the Public Buildings Act of 1959 initiated half a million civilians worked for the hundreds more. Of the 1,500 federally United States. In 1965, approximately owned buildings that PBS manages today, 2.7 million Americans held non-uniformed more than one-third dates between 1949 jobs. Federal civilian employment multi- and 1979. plied five times in less than four decades thanks to the New Deal, and Edith Green- GSA’s mid-century building boom almost Wendell Wyatt Federal Building (EGWW) unanimously embodied the democratic stands 18 stories above Portland, Oregon, ideas and sleek geometry of modernist as a long-drawn consequence of that architecture. Not only had modernism historic transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 84) at the Gerald R
    Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 84) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo.• Day. Yr.) LITTLE AMERICA WESTGATE PLAZA HOTEL OCTOBER 25, 1976 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA TIME DAY 7:28 a.m. MONDAY r--­PHONE TIME il ~ ACTIVITY r---I-n---'---O-ut--~ g The President was an overnight guest at the Little America Westgate Plaza Hotel, 1055 Second Avenue, San Diego, California. Note: The President was accompanied by members of the press throughout his visit to California and Oregon. 7:28 7:30 P The President talked with his Personal Secretary, Dorothy E. Downton. 7:35 7:38 P The President talked with the First Lady. 7:55 The President went to his motorcade. 8:00 8:07 The President motored from the Little America Westgate Plaza Hotel to Lindburgh Field. ? ? The President addressed the crowd gathered for his departure. 8:19 10:43 The President flew by the "Spirit of '76" from Lindburgh Field to Boeing International Airport, Seattle, Washington. For a list of passengers, see APPENDIX "A." The President met with: 8:22 8:26 Richard B. Cheney, Assistant 8:25 8:26 Don Penny Schneider, Consultant 8:42 9:05 The President participated in an interview with: Strobe Talbott, Senior Political Correspondent for Time magazine Murray Gart, Chief of Correspondents for Time magazine Dean Fisher, White House Correspondent for Time magazine Mr. Cheney 9:07 9:08 The President met with Mr. Schneider. 9:09 9:30 The President met with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S2135
    February 11, 2009 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S2135 Dealer and a passionate advocate of While Debbie is everywhere, raising Zeltser with his prescribed medica- FDR’s agenda. funds for great causes, creating per- tions. As a House page in the late 1930s and sonal relationships that enrich so He was initially denied two inde- early 1940s, JOHN learned the intrica- many lives, JOHN is only where he pendent medical evaluations and he cies of House procedure. He got to needs to be—focusing like a laser on has reported being physically assaulted know his way around, and developed a legislative and policy goals. and abused while incarcerated. Am- profound respect for leaders like Sam There is a common thread in the Din- nesty International has urged that Rayburn. gells’ legislative maneuvers, charitable Belarusian authorities no longer sub- Even in his youth, JOHN was any- endeavors and even JOHN’s unique use ject Mr. Zeltser to ‘‘further torture and thing but a passive observer. When of language: they are all devoted to the other ill-treatment.’’ Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and FDR goal of helping working people. People Mr. Zeltser was convicted of ‘‘using came to Congress and declared it a back home love ‘‘Big JOHN’’ because false official documents’’ and ‘‘at- ‘‘date which will live in infamy,’’ JOHN they know he is on their side—fighting tempted economic espionage’’ in a was in the Chamber. In fact, JOHN saw for their jobs, their health, their chil- closed judicial proceeding. The U.S. to it that one audio recorder continued dren. Embassy in Minsk criticized the pro- to run even after FDR’s speech ended, That is why, as much evidence as ceedings, noting that it was denied the so thanks to him we have a fascinating there is of John’s influence and respect opportunity to observe the trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Directories - Congressional Club (2)” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 34, folder “Directories - Congressional Club (2)” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Betty Ford donated to the United States of America her copyrights in all of her unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. ill:~e QI:ongressional Qtlub ~asqingtnn, c!0· OL 0 I> . <... !ear l8nok 1971-1973 <!r~e Qfongressfonal QUuh ~asqington, ~· OL !ear ~nok 1971-1973 ll I I THE PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE The wealth of service rendered by the wives of Washington officialdom has been a continuing source of inspiration to those charged with the responsibilities for "life, liberty and the pnrsuit of happiness" in our Nation's Capital. Since it was chartered by the Congress in 1908 as an educational, civic and social organization, the Congressional Club has channeled its richly diverse and talented membership into meaningful avenues of service. Throughout our sixty-three Club years our informative pro­ \. grams and social contacts have advised us of the needs and challenges, and our classes and workshops have provided us with the necessary knowledge and special skills to meet them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancer L. Haggerty: an Oral History
    Ancer L. Haggerty: An Oral History i ii Ancer L. Haggerty An Oral History FOREWORD BY JUDGE OWEN PANNER US District Court of Oregon Historical Society Oral History Project Portland, Oregon iii Copyright © 2014 United States District Court of Oregon Historical Society Printed in the United States of America PROJECT STAFF Janice Dilg, Editor & Production Manager Clark Hansen & Michael O’Rourke, Interviewers Laura L. Ross & Johanna Ogden, Transcribers Emily Stuckman, Auditor Adair Law, Copy editor iv CONTENTS Foreword............................................................................................................................................vi Introduction....................................................................................................................................viii Tape One, December 9, 2005...........................................................................................................1 Side One—Family history; Vanport; Early education; High school football Side Two—Team sports at UO; Life in 1950s-60s; Joining the Marine Corps; Infantry Officer training Tape Two, December 9, 2005.........................................................................................................16 Side One—Wounded in Vietnam; Wartime politics; UC Hastings School of Law Tape Two, January 13, 2006...........................................................................................................24 Side Two—Metropolitan Public Defender’s Office; Local bench and bar; Marriage and children; Going on
    [Show full text]
  • General Election Benton
    19 STATE OF OREGON General Election November 3, 1964 Compiled and Distributed by HOWELL APPLING, JR. Secetary of State Benton · County INFORMATION FOR VOTERS (1) Requirements for a citizen to Application for the ballot may be qualify as a voter: filed with, or mailed to the Citizen of the United States. County Clerk at any time with- Twenty-one or more years of age. in 60 days before the general Resided in the state at least six election, September 4-Novem- months. ber 2 (Service voters, after Able to read and write English. January 1 of election year). Registered as an elector with the Application includes: County Clerk or official regis- Your signature. trar at least 30 days before Address or precinct number. election. Statement of reason for ap- (2) Voting by absentee ballot. plication. You may apply for an absentee Applications filed less than five ballot if: days before election, October You are a registered voter. 29-November 2. require addi- ("Service voters" are auto- tional statement that: matically registered by fol- Voter is physically unable to lowing the service voting get to the polls, or procedure.) Voter was unexpectedly You have reason to believe called out of the county in you will be absent from the five-day period. your county on election Emergencies on Election Day: day. Physicial disability must be You live more than 15 miles certified by licensed practi- from your polling place. tioner of healing arts or You are unable by reason of authorized Christian Science physical disability to go to practitioner. Involuntary the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler Hansen a Trailblazing Washington Politician John C
    Julia Butler Hansen A trailblazing Washington politician John C. Hughes Julia Butler Hansen A trailblazing Washington politician John C. Hughes First Edition Second Printing Copyright © 2020 Legacy Washington Office of the Secretary of State All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-889320-45-8 Ebook ISBN 978-1-889320-44-1 Front cover photo: John C. Hughes Back cover photo: Hansen Family Collection Book Design by Amber Raney Cover Design by Amber Raney and Laura Mott Printed in the United States of America by Gorham Printing, Centralia, Washington Also by John C. Hughes: On the Harbor: From Black Friday to Nirvana, with Ryan Teague Beckwith Booth Who? A Biography of Booth Gardner Nancy Evans, First-Rate First Lady Lillian Walker, Washington State Civil Rights Pioneer The Inimitable Adele Ferguson Slade Gorton, a Half Century in Politics John Spellman: Politics Never Broke His Heart Pressing On: Two Family-Owned Newspapers in the 21st Century Washington Remembers World War II, with Trova Heffernan Korea 65, the Forgotten War Remembered, with Trova Heffernan and Lori Larson 1968: The Year that Rocked Washington, with Bob Young and Lori Larson Ahead of the Curve: Washington Women Lead the Way, 1910-2020, with Bob Young Legacy Washington is dedicated to preserving the history of Washington and its continuing story. www.sos.wa.gov/legacy For Bob Bailey, Alan Thompson and Peter Jackson Julia poses at the historic site sign outside the Wahkiakum County Courthouse in 1960. Alan Thompson photo Contents Preface: “Like money in the bank” 6 Introduction: “Julia Who?” 10 Chapter 1: “Just Plain Me” 17 Chapter 2: “Quite a bit of gumption” 25 Chapter 3: Grief compounded 31 Chapter 4: “Oh! Dear Diary” 35 Chapter 5: Paddling into politics 44 Chapter 6: Smart enough, too 49 Chapter 7: Hopelessly disgusted 58 Chapter 8: To the last ditch 65 Chapter 9: The fighter remains 73 Chapter 10: Lean times 78 Chapter 11: “Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The .Amal.Gama:Ted Sugar Ccmpany C
    UNITED STATES BEET SUGAR ASSOCIATION WASHINGTON - April 28, 1967 MEMORAN.llJM TO INWSTRY PUBLIC RELATIONS COMMITI'EE Ernest Haycox, Jr. - The .Amal.gama:ted Sugar Ccmpany c. w. Briggs - .American Crysta.l Sugar Cam:paey James Yuenger - Buckeye Sugars, Inc. Tan Ferril - The Great Western Sugar Campany Francis L. Kafka - Holly Sugar Corporation Dave Roche - Michigan Sugar Company c. A. Coryell, Jr. - Monitor Sugar Company Margaretta Carey - The National Sugar Manufacturing Company L'e.ve Carter - Spreckels Sugar Company Alden L. Stock - Union Sugar Division Keith J. Wallentine - Utah-Idaho Sugar Company John McGill - Farmers & Manufacturers Beet Sugar Association Here are a couple of things that may be of same help or at least of some interest. (1) 1967 Congressional Handbook, issued by the Legislative Depart­ ment of the Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. Lists members of both houses a.lphabetically as well as by states, and also lists all standing ccmnittees, and the Senate and House leadership. Not so comprehensive as the regular Congressional Directory, of course, but can be, is handy for quick reference or mailing lists •••••• Incidentally the new regular Congressional Directory is now available. May be purchased from Superintendent of Documents, U.s. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 -- $3.50 for regular edition, $5.00 for thumb-indexed {much quicker to use). Ask for "Congressiona.l Directory, 90th Congress, First Session." Bears March 1967 date. {Or maybe you have already received a copy from your Senator or Congressman.) (2) Reprint of article on the so-called world sugar market from January, 1967, issue of Sugar il.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party: Background and Recent
    THE MISSISSIPPI FREEDOM DEMOCRATIC PARTY Background lnformaUon for SUpportive Campaigns by Campus Groups repared by STEVE MAX Political Education ProJect, Room 309, 119 Firth Ave., N. Y .c. 10003 Associated with Students for a Democratic Society THE MISSISSIPPI FREEDOM DEMOCRATIC PARTY: BACKGROUND AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS by STEVE IvlAX The Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party was founded April 26, 1964 in order to create an opportunity for meaningful political expres­ sion for the 438,000 adult Negro Mississippians ~ho traditionally have been denied this right. In-addition to being a political­ instrument, the FDP provides a focus for the coordination of civil rights activity in the state and around the country. Although its memters do not necessarily· think in the se -terms, the MFDP is the organization above all others whose work is most directly forcing a realignment within the Democratic Party. All individuals and organizations who understand that ' when the Negro is not free, then all are in chains; who realize that the present system of discrimi­ nation precludes the abolition of poverty, and who have an interest in t he destruction of the Dixiecrat-Republican alliance and the purging of the racists from the Democratic Party are poteptial allies of the MFDP. BACKGROUND INFORMATION- The Mississippi Democratic Party runs the state of Mississippi _wit h an iron hand·. It controls the legislative, executive and judicial be nches of the state government. Prior to the November, 1964 elec­ tion all 49 state Senators and all but one of the 122 Representa­ tives were Democrats. Mississippi sent four Democrats and one Goldwater Republican to Congress last November.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Benchmarks Spring 2003
    Oregon BENCHMARKS THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Upcoming Famous Cases Series Arguing Before the United States Supreme Court By Bill Long ou are cordially invited to attend the next pro- a violation of the Eighth Amendment prohibition Ygram in the Famous Cases series on Thurs- against infliction of cruel and unusual punishment. day, May 1, 2003 from 4 to 5:45 p.m. in the Cer- The Court concluded that no constitutional viola- emonial Courtroom (16th Floor) of the Hatfield tion occurred. The case emerged from a June 1980 Federal Courthouse. The program “Arguing Before riot at the Oregon State Penitentiary. the U.S. Supreme Court” will feature Stephen Mr. Volpert will describe his involvement repre- Wasby, the leading scholar on Oregon cases that senting the Vernonia School District in Vernonia have been considered by the Court, as well as a School District 47J v. Acton, 515 distinguished panel of Oregon attorneys who have Us 646 (1995). At issue in this de- argued before the Court. CLE credit for the pro- cision of a divided Court was the gram is pending. Refreshments will be provided. constitutionality of the school Professor Stephen Wasby, now emeritus profes- district’s practice of subjecting stu- sor from the University of Albany and a former dents desirous of participating in student of retired Oregon Supreme Court Justice interscholastic athletics to random Hans Linde, will start off with an informative pre- urinalysis. The focus of the Court’s Tim Volpert sentation on the contribution of cases originating consideration was a student’s fed- in the District of Oregon to U.S eral and state constitutional right to be free from Supreme Court jurisprudence.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Oregon
    STATE OF OREGON Republican Party Primary Nominating Election May 24, 1966 Compiled and Distributed by TOM McCALL Secretary of State INFORMATION FOR VOTERS (1) Requirements for a citizen to You are physically unable qualify as a voter: to go to the polls. Citizen of the United States. Application for the ballot may be Twenty-one or more years of age. filed with, or mailed to the Resided in the state at least six County Clerk at any time with­ months. in 60 days before the primary Able to read and write English. election, March 25-May 23 Registered as an elector with the (Service voters, after January 1 County Clerk or official regis­ of election year). Application trar at least 30 days before includes: election. Your signature. (2) Voting by absentee ballot. Address or precinct number. You may apply for an absentee Statement of reason for ap- ballot if: plication. You are a registered voter. Applications filed less than five ("Service voters" are auto­ days before election, May 19- matically registered by fol­ 23, require additional statement lowing the service voting that: procedure.) Voter is physically unable to You have reason to believe get to the polls, or you will be absent from Voter was unexpectedly your county on election called out of the county in day. the five-day period. You live more than 15 miles Emergencies on Election Day: from your polling place. Physical disability must be You are unable by reason of certified by licensed practi­ physical disability to go to tioner of healing arts or the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Mesa Outline
    Campaign for Rock Mesa: How Faith, Hope & Charity Saved the Three Sisters Wilderness By Ronald Eber – Historian – Sierra Club - Oregon Chapter1 @ copyright Ronald Eber March 12, 2021 - DRAFT Rock Mesa from Le Conte Crater Photo by Ronald Eber The Untold Story of Rock Mesa A review of the nation’s mining laws about a 1966 open-pit mine proposed by Kennecott Copper in the heart of the Glacier Peak Wilderness concluded that “no other Mining Law controversy of such dramatic proportions has erupted in congressionally designated wilderness.”2 This conclusion clearly missed the major controversy that unfolded at the same time over an open-pit 1 Ronald Eber was Chair of the Oregon Sierra Club Chapter and Wilderness Coordinator between 1981 to 1985 and managed the Club’s and Oregon Conservation Community’s Rock Mesa campaign and the effort to get funding from Congress that ensured the purchase of the mining claims at Rock Mesa. 2 The Mining Law – A Study in Perpetual Motion, John D. Leshy, Resources for the Future, Inc. 1987, p.235. Also see: An Open Pit Visible from the Moon: The Wilderness Act and the Fight to Protect Miners Ridge and the Public Interest, Adam Sowards, University of Oklahoma Press, 2020. 1 pumice mine at Rock Mesa in the Three Sisters Wilderness of Oregon. It may not have gained the same national notoriety as the one at Glacier Peak, but in Oregon it certainly was a shocking threat. Here now is the complete untold story of the campaign to save Rock Mesa. Introduction From 1961 to 1983, a broad coalition of Oregon conservationists led a political and legal campaign to prohibit a proposed mine for block pumice at Rock Mesa in the Three Sisters Wilderness.
    [Show full text]