DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL DARP/EA Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL DARP/EA Document United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management In Coordination with: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Colorado Attorney General’s Office Colorado Department of Natural Resources Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Final Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/ Environmental Assessment for the West Creek Oil Spill, Gateway, Colorado Grand Junction Field Office McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area 2815 H Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 DOI-BLM-CO-N030-2016-0019-EA i January 10, 2018 The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the stewardship of our public lands. It is committed to manage, protect, and improve these lands in a manner to serve the needs of the American people for all times. Management is based on the principles of multiple-use and sustained yield of our nation’s resources within a framework of environmental responsibility and scientific technology. These resources include recreation; rangelands; timber; minerals; watershed; fish and wildlife; wilderness; air; and scenic, scientific and cultural values. Suggested Citation West Creek Oil Spill NRDAR Trustees. 2018. West Creek Oil Spill Final Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/Environmental Assessment. Prepared by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado Attorney General’s Office, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Abbreviations and Acronyms BLM United States Bureau of Land Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations CAGO Colorado Attorney General’s Office CDNR Colorado Department of Natural Resources CDPHE Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CWA Clean Water Act DARP Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan DOI U.S. Department of the Interior EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact HEA Habitat Equivalency Analysis MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act NCP National Contingency Plan NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NRDAR Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration OPA Oil Pollution Act PRP Potentially Responsible Party RP Restoration Plan DARP/EA Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan / Environmental Assessment Site Site of gasoline and diesel spill USC United States Code USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service iii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. vii TABLE OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. viii CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ................................................... 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED ....................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Summary of Spill History and Resulting Public Losses .................................................. 2 1.3.2 Restoration Goals ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3.3 Need for Restoration ........................................................................................................ 5 1.4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................ 5 1.4.1 Public Scoping: .................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.2 Internal Scoping: ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4.3 Issues Identified: ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4.4 Public Comment Period: .................................................................................................... 7 1.5 DECISION TO BE MADE .................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 2 – NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND RESTORATION ....... 8 2.1 ENVIRONMENT AFFECTED BY THE SPILL ................................................................ 8 2.1.1 Physical Environment ...................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Biological Environment ................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Archeological and Cultural Resources ............................................................................. 9 2.1.4 Recreational Services ....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 INJURY QUANTIFICATION AND RESTORATION PLANNING ................................ 9 2.2.1 Quantification of Damages ............................................................................................. 10 2.2.2 Restoration Project Selection Criteria ............................................................................ 10 2.2.3 Injury Quantification and Development of Restoration Alternatives ............................ 12 2.3 DAMAGE ASSESSMENT COORDINATION ................................................................ 13 2.3.1 Coordination among the Trustees .................................................................................. 13 2.3.2 Coordination with Response Agencies .......................................................................... 13 2.3.3 Coordination with the Responsible Party ....................................................................... 14 2.3.4 Coordination with the Public .......................................................................................... 14 2.4 COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIIES ......................................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1 Major Federal Laws ....................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1.1 Oil Pollution Act ..................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1.2 National Environmental Policy Act ........................................................................ 15 2.4.1.3 Clean Water Act (including Colorado Water Quality Control Act) ....................... 15 2.4.1.4 Endangered Species Act ......................................................................................... 16 2.4.2 Other Federal and State Laws, Regulations, and Policies .............................................. 16 2.4.2.1 Clean Air Act ......................................................................................................... 16 2.4.2.2 Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act ...................................................................... 16 2.4.2.3 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ....................................................................... 17 iv 2.4.2.4 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ..................................................................................... 17 2.4.2.5 Preservation of Historic and Archeological Data Act ............................................ 17 2.4.2.6 Executive Order 11990 Protection of Wetlands .................................................... 17 2.4.2.7 Executive Order 12962 Recreational Fisheries ...................................................... 18 2.4.2.8 Executive Order 13112 Invasive Species .............................................................. 18 2.4.2.9 Colorado Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act ....................................... 18 2.4.2.10 Colorado Noxious Weed Act .................................................................................. 18 2.4.2.11 Nongame, Endangered, or Threatened Species Conservation Act ......................... 19 CHAPTER 3 – ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................. 19 3.1 PROPOSED ACTION AND OTHER ALTERNATIVES ............................................ 19 3.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Alternatives Analyzed in Detail ..................................................................................... 19 3.1.2.1 Alternative A – No Action Alternative ..................................................................... 19 3.1.2.2 ALTERNATIVE B – Proposed Action ................................................................... 19 3.1.2.2.1 Project 1: Enhanced access to West Creek ...................................................... 20 3.1.2.2.2 Project 2: Management of Tamarisk and other Invasive Species .................... 21 3.1.2.2.3 Project 3: Fish and Riverine Habitat Restoration along the Dolores River .. 26 3.1.2.2.4 Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Proposed Action ........................ 34 3.1.3 Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ...................................................... 39 3.1.4 Plan Conformance Review ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), Western Colorado: Effects of Stream Capture and Anomalously Rapid Pleistocene River Incision
    CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II themed issue Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), western Colorado: Effects of stream capture and anomalously rapid Pleistocene river incision Andres Aslan1,*, William C. Hood2,*, Karl E. Karlstrom3,*, Eric Kirby4, Darryl E. Granger5,*, Shari Kelley6, Ryan Crow3,*, Magdalena S. Donahue3,*, Victor Polyak3,*, and Yemane Asmerom3,* 1Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Colorado Mesa University, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, USA 2Grand Junction Geological Society, 515 Dove Court, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Northrop Hall 141, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 202D Wilkinson Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, USA 5Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA 6New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA ABSTRACT opment of signifi cant relief between adjacent through resistant Precambrian bedrock (Fig. 2). stream segments, which led to stream piracy. It has no major river at its base, and is currently Cosmogenic-burial and U-series dating, The response of rivers to the abandonment drained by two underfi t streams, East and West identifi cation of fl uvial terraces and lacus- of Unaweep Canyon illustrates how the Creeks, which drain the northeast and southwest trine deposits, and river profi le reconstruc- mode and tempo of long-term fl uvial incision ends of the canyon, respectively. Starting with tions show that capture of the Gunnison are punctuated by short-term geomorphic the Hayden Survey (Peale, 1877), geologists River by the Colorado River and abandon- events such as stream piracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Drainage Changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Pleistocene drainage changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand Valley region of western Colorado, including formation and abandonment of Unaweep Canyon: a hypothesis Scott Sinnock, 1981, pp. 127-136 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Unaweep Canyon and Its Role in the Drainage Evolution of the Northern Colorado Plateau
    CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II themed issue Soreghan et al. Geology of Unaweep Canyon and its role in the drainage evolution of the northern Colorado Plateau Gerilyn S. Soreghan1, Dustin E. Sweet2, Stuart N. Thomson3, Sara A. Kaplan1, Kristen R. Marra1, Greg Balco4, and Thaddeus M. Eccles1 1School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd Street, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA 2Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, 125 Science Building, Box 41053, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 4Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, California 94709, USA ABSTRACT Thermochronological data from Precam- teau and is the only major canyon in the Colo- brian basement within Unaweep Canyon rado River drainage not occupied by a river. It Unaweep Canyon (Colorado, USA) is a and Permian strata at the western mouth penetrates Mesozoic strata deep into Precam- large, Precambrian-cored gorge that bisects of the canyon indicate onset of incision in brian crystalline basement, but paradoxically the Uncompahgre Plateau of the northeastern latest Miocene time (ca. 6–5 Ma), at a time- hosts two underfi t drainages, East Creek and Colorado Plateau, but has no through-fl ow- averaged rate of ~210–275 m/m.y. Onset of West Creek, which fl ow in opposite directions ing axial stream; it is drained by two underfi t canyon occupation and rapid incision by the from a gentle divide within the canyon (Figs. creeks (East and West Creek) that head at a ancestral Gunnison River coincided with the 1 and 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Mesa County
    Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Mesa County Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources, 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Mesa County Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife, Wetlands Program 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203 Prepared by: Joe Rocchio, Georgia Doyle, Peggy Lyon and Denise Culver May 29, 2003 Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyright © 2002 by Colorado Natural Heritage Program Cover photograph: Rio Grande cottonwood riparian forest (Populus deltoides ssp. wislizenii/Rhus trilobata) along the Colorado River near the Mesa/Garfield county line (CNHP photo). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support for this study was provided by the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Program. We greatly appreciate the support and assistance of Alex Chappell, Coordinator of the Division of Wildlife's Wetlands Program and John Toolen, Habitat Biologist with the Division of Wildlife and the Western Colorado Five Rivers Wetland Focus Area Committee Coordinator. This project would not have been possible without the help of many dedicated individuals. We appreciate the support of the members of the Western Colorado Five Rivers Wetland Focus Area Committee for providing their local knowledge of important wetlands in Mesa County. Rob Bleiberg and James Ferriday of Mesa Land Trust provided maps of conservation easements to aid in assessing threats. We thank Dave Soker, Bob Burdick, Doug Osmundson, and Terry Ireland of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Grand Junction for invaluable assistance with information on conservation easements, endangered fish, and Southwest Willow Flycatchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Westwater Lost and Found
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2004 Westwater Lost and Found Mike Milligan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the Rhetoric and Composition Commons Recommended Citation Milligan, Mike, "Westwater Lost and Found" (2004). All USU Press Publications. 145. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/145 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Westwater 1/7/04 2:47 PM Page i Westwater Lost and Found Westwater 1/7/04 2:47 PM Page ii Westwater 1/7/04 2:47 PM Page iii Westwater Lost and Found Mike Milligan Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 2004 Westwater 1/7/04 2:47 PM Page iv Copyright © 2004 Utah State University Press All rights reserved. Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 Cover design by Richard Howe. Cover photographs: Catching air rising out of the hole at Skull Rapid. Photo by Mike Milligan. Margaret and Dick Durrance, Ted Steinway, and a farmer (probably Emmett Elizondo) at Westwater in 1950. Margaret Durrance photo. Ulrich Martins watches Ted Young run Funnel Falls on the first kayak trip through Westwater Canyon on August 16, 1962. Joseph M. Lacy photo courtesy of Mayme Lacy. E. C. and Lula Malin at their Westwater ranch with their dog Fritz. Photo courtesy of Ila B. Reay. Manufactured in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exhumed Late Paleozoic Canyon in the Rocky Mountains
    GEOLOGICAL NOTES An Exhumed Late Paleozoic Canyon in the Rocky Mountains Gerilyn S. Soreghan,1 Dustin E. Sweet, Kristen R. Marra, Cortland F. Eble,2 Michael J. Soreghan, R. Douglas Elmore, Sara A. Kaplan, and Michael D. Blum3 School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd Street, Norman, Oklahoma 73019-1009, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Landscapes are thought to be youthful, particularly those of active orogenic belts. Unaweep Canyon in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, a large gorge drained by two opposite-flowing creeks, is an exception. Its origin has long been enigmatic, but new data indicate that it is an exhumed late Paleozoic landform. Its survival within a region of profound late Paleozoic orogenesis demands a reassessment of tectonic models for the Ancestral Rocky Mountains, and its form and genesis have significant implications for understanding late Paleozoic equatorial climate. This discovery highlights the utility of paleogeomorphology as a tectonic and climatic indicator. Online enhancement: appendix. Introduction Most geologists view landforms to be “young” a vival, with broader implications for the tectonic and priori, a concept that dates to the works of James climatic histories of this and other regions. This ex- Hutton (1788), who considered landscapes youthful ample highlights the potential persistence of ancient owing to constant renewal of Earth’s surface (Twi- landscapes within even active orogenic belts and the dale 1998). The possibility of the great antiquity of utility of paleogeomorphology as a tool for tectonic landscapes remains underappreciated despite dis- and climatic reconstructions. covery of growing numbers of pre-Cenozoic land- forms (Twidale 1976, 1994), particularly in cratonal regions of the Gondwanan continents but also in, Geologic Setting: The Mystery of for example, the Precambrian Shield regions of Unaweep Canyon North America (Ambrose 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Uplift of the Rocky Mountains: Evidence from U-Pb Detrital Zircon
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2016 EPISODIC UPLIFT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: EVIDENCE FROM U-PB DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY AND LOW-TEMPERATURE THERMOCHRONOLOGY WITH A CHAPTER ON USING MOBILE TECHNOLOGY FOR GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION Maria Magdalena Donahue Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds Recommended Citation Donahue, Maria Magdalena. "EPISODIC UPLIFT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: EVIDENCE FROM U-PB DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY AND LOW-TEMPERATURE THERMOCHRONOLOGY WITH A CHAPTER ON USING MOBILE TECHNOLOGY FOR GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds/18 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i EPISODIC UPLIFT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: EVIDENCE FROM U-PB DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY AND LOW-TEMPERATURE THERMOCHRONOLOGY WITH A CHAPTER ON USING MOBILE TECHNOLOGY FOR GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION by MARIA MAGDALENA SANDOVAL DONAHUE B.S. Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, 2005 B.S. Fine Arts, University of Oregon, 2005 M.S. Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, 2007 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Earth & Planetary Sciences The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May 2016 ii DEDICATION To my husband, John, who has encouraged, supported me who has been my constant inspiration, source of humor, & true companion and partner in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forests
    United States Forest Grand Mesa, 2250 Highway 50 Department of Service Uncompahgre and Delta, CO 81416 Agriculture Gunnison Voice: 970-874-6600 National Forests TDD: 970-874-6660 File Code: 1920 Date: February 16, 2007 RE: Proposed Forest Plan Release Dear Participant: I am pleased to announce the release of our proposed Forest Plan. This proposed Plan is a result of several years of hard work by the Forest Service, and by all of you who love the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison (GMUG) National Forests. Thank you for staying involved! All of those late night public meetings and your valuable input have greatly contributed to this effort. Much has changed in western Colorado over the past 23 years since our 1983 Plan was developed. With your help, we have done our best to produce a proposed Plan that balances the values of all forest users, while protecting the environment for future generations. The GMUG is one of the first National Forests to revise a Forest Plan under the 2005 Planning Rule. We have taken extra time to ensure that our proposed Plan meets the intent of the agency’s new forest planning approach. Our proposed Plan reflects the strategic and aspirational nature of this new direction. Once finalized, it will establish the vision that will guide future management. The proposed Plan demonstrates our understanding that the Forest does not exist in isolation, but is part of a larger landscape that is influenced by many stakeholders and communities with a wide variety of interests. The proposed Plan, once final, will not make project-level decisions, or commitments to site- specific actions or projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Unaweep Canyon (Colorado) Distal Cutler (Loess) Utah Proximal Cutler
    Ice in Tropical Pangaea: An “Outrageous” Hypothesis that Inspired a Modern Sediment- Unaweep Canyon Weathering Study (Colorado) G.S. (Lynn) Soreghan (w/ Many Collaborators) University of Oklahoma Distal Cutler (Loess) Utah Proximal Cutler (Dropstone) Utah Main Points: • Alpine glaciation in tropical Pangaea, that extended to low elevation (<1600 m) • The Late Paleozoic was colder Unaweep Canyon than most think. (Colorado) • How? Understanding this helps us refine climate models. • This inspired trip to Peru (modern weathering study). Distal Cutler (Loess) Utah Proximal Cutler (Dropstone) Utah Starting Point: Unaweep Canyon-- An Enigmatic Landscape “To attribute this cañon to the streams now occupying it is manifestly absurd” (Henry Gannett, 1882) Why “Absurd”? Colorado River Gunnison River Unaweep Canyon 10 km Uncompahgre Plateau Dolores River Geology Deep, wide canyon through Mesozoic, Precambrian, perpendicular to Plateau Two underft streams fow from subtle divide Longitudinal Profle Unaweep Divide West Creek East Creek Previous Ideas for Formation of Unaweep Canyon • River Incision & Abandonment? • Incision by Gunnison and/or Colorado rivers, and subsequent abandonment, possibly by tectonic deformation of the Uncompahgre Plateau (e.g., Peale, 1877; Gannett, 1882; Lohman, 1961; Cater, 1966; Sinnock, 1981). • But. Problems… • Canyon shape is strange. • No evidence for neotectonic deformation. Previous Ideas for Formation of Unaweep Canyon • River Incision & Abandonment? • Incision by Gunnison and/or Colorado rivers, and subsequent abandonment,
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Drainage Changes in and South of Unaweep Canyon, Southwestern Colorado S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Ancient drainage changes in and south of Unaweep Canyon, southwestern Colorado S. W. Lohman, 1981, pp. 137-144 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Incision History of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison, Colorado M
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2007 Quaternary incision history of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison, Colorado M. Magdalena Sandoval Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds Recommended Citation Sandoval, M. Magdalena. "Quaternary incision history of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison, Colorado." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds/77 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. M. Magdalena Sandoval Candidate Earth & Planetary Sciences Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: Approved by the Thesis Committee: Dr. Karl Karlstrom, Chairperson Dr. Laura Crossey Dr. David Coblentz Accepted: Dean, Graduate School Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks to my graduate committee: Dr. Karl Karlstrom, Dr. Laurie Crossey and Dr. David Coblentz for input and encouragement through this project. Additional thanks to Dr. Darryl Granger and the PRIME lab staff; Dr. Andres Aslan and Dr. Rex Cole of Mesa State College and the 2006 Mesa State College REU class for field assistance and cheerful participation; Chuck Betton; Dr. Eric Kirby of the University of Pennsylvania for beginning river and topographic modeling; Louis Sandoval for expert back hoe execution. CREST project funding and the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Earth and Environmental Sciences division; and the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at the University of New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmogenic-Nuclide Burial Ages for Pleistocene Sedimentary Fill In
    Cosmogenic-nuclide burial ages for Pleistocene sedimentary fill in Unaweep Canyon, Colorado, USA Greg Balcoa,∗, Gerilyn S. Soreghanb, Dustin E. Sweetc, Kristen R. Marrab, Paul R. Biermand a Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley CA 94709 USA b School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 E Boyd St., Norman, OK 73019 USA c Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA d Geology Department, University of Vermont, 180 Colchester Ave., Burlington, VT 05405 USA Abstract We applied both single-sample and isochron methods of cosmogenic-nuclide burial dating to determine the age of the sedimentary fill in Unaweep Canyon, western Colorado, USA. This stratigraphic sequence is of interest because it documents capture and diversion of the ancestral Gunnison River by the Colorado River during late Cenozoic incision of the Colorado Plateau. Seven 26Al-10Be burial ages from sedimentary infill penetrated by a borehole in central Unaweep Canyon, as well as a 26Al-10Be burial isochron age formed by multiple clasts and grain-size separates in a sample from the stratigraphically lower Gateway gravels, indicate that canyon blockage, initiation of lacustrine sediment accumulation, and presumed river capture, took place 1.41 ± 0.19 Ma. Lacustrine sedimentation ceased 1.34 ± 0.13 Ma. Keywords: Unaweep Canyon, Pleistocene, Cenozoic, river incision, river capture, Gunnison River, Colorado Plateau, aluminum-26, beryllium-10, burial dating, burial isochron dating 1. Unaweep Canyon et al., 2007, 2008). Soreghan et al. (2007, 2008) further ar- gued that the canyon was originally formed in Protero- Unaweep Canyon forms a 70-km-long wind gap zoic basement by Permo-Pennsylvanian glacial erosion, through the Uncompaghre Plateau in western Colorado, buried by late Paleozoic sedimentary fill, and re-exposed exposing Proterozoic basement beneath the Mesozoic by Cenozoic incision.
    [Show full text]