Developmental Studies in Smilax. Benjamin Franklin Martin Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Developmental Studies in Smilax. Benjamin Franklin Martin Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1975 Developmental Studies in Smilax. Benjamin Franklin Martin Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Martin, Benjamin Franklin Jr, "Developmental Studies in Smilax." (1975). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2882. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2882 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. MARTIN, Benjamin Franklin, Jr., 1946- DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES IN SMILAX. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Ph.D., 1975 Botany Xerox University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan48ioe © BENJAMIN FRANKLIN MARTIN, Jr. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Developmental Studies in Smilax A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the Louisiana State University Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany by Benjamin F. Martin, Jr. B.S., McNeese State University, 1968 M.S., McNeese State University, 1970 December, 1975 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLElXaiENTS The author wishes to express his gratitude to Dr. Shirley C. Tucker for her guidance, patience, and encouragement throughout the course of this study. He thanks Dr. Wilbur H. Duncan (University of Georgia, Athens) for help in identification of specimens and Dr. Donald R. Kaplan (University of California, Berkeley) for his helpful suggestions. He also acknowledges the Department of Microbiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana for use of the Denton critical point drying apparatus; the Geology Department, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, for use of the JSM-2 scanning electron microscope; the pathology lab of St. Francis Cabrini Hospital, Alexandria, Louisiana for use of their cryotome; and Michael Postek for assistance with the photography. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................... ü LIST OF FIGURES.......................................... v ABSTRACT....................................................xiv INTRODUCTION.............................................. 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS.................................... 4 RESULTS.................... 6 Morphological Observations............................ 6 Anatomical Observations .............................. 9 A. The Shoot Apex............ » .................. 9 B. Leaf Development.............................. H 1. Initiation and early ontogeny ............. 11 2. Lamina development......................... 13 3. Pro cambial development..................... 15 4. Differentiation of vascular tissue.......... 16 5. Differentiation of epidermis............... 18 C. Tendril Development........................... 20 1. Initiation and early ontogeny ............. 20 2. Later development......................... 21 3. Vasculature of the tendril.................. 22 4. Epidermal features......................... 22 D. Axillary Bud Development....................... 23 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Page E. Latlcifers and Idloblasts........................ 24 1. Latlcifers.................................. 24 2. Idloblasts.................................. 25 F. Shoot Tip Abortion In Smilax pumlla.............. 26 DISCUSSION................................................. 28 LITERATURE CITED............................................45 PLATE LEGENDS..............................................51 VITA....................................................... 99 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. Rhizome system of S_. bona-nox. Tu, tuber; R, rhizome; Rt, root. X 0.4............................... 51 2. Vigorous shoot tip of bona-nox. La, lamina; T, tendril; P, petiole; TB, terminal bud. X 2 . 51 3. Dwarf shoot tip of bona-nox. TB, terminal bud; Fk, prickle. X I ................................. 51 4. Mature foliage leaves of bona-nox. X 0 . 4 ........... 51 5. Rhizome system of S^. smallll. Paler distal portions represent new growth. X 0.2................. 53 6. One tuber of smallll and lowermost nodes of aerial shoot. Tu, tuber ; Rt, root; S, scale leaves. X 0.5 . ................................. 53 7. Shoot tip of S. smallll. La, lamina; T, tendril; LB, leaf base; TB, terminal bud. X I ................... 53 8. Mature foliage leaves of S, smallll. X 0.6.......... 53 9. Rhizome system of _S. pumlla. Tu, tuber; R, rhizome. X I ............................................55 10. Rhizome of pumlla bearing scale leaves and roots. S, scale leaf; Rt, root. X I ................. 55 11. Trailing growth habit of S^. pumlla. X 0 . 1 ............. 55 12. Climbing growth habit of pumlla. X 0 . 2 ............. 55 13. Tendrils of pumlla colled around stem. X 0.2 . 55 14. Shoot apex of pumlla In minimal phase with tip of leaf 2 removed to show the apical dome. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph. SA, shoot apex; L, leaf. X 350................................. 57 15. Shoot apex of pumlla with two youngest leaf prlmordla Intact and partially obscuring the shoot apex. SEM photograph. L, leaf. X 300........ 57 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 16. Shoot apex of 2» hona-nox In maximal phase In view from above. Tip of leaf 2 has been removed. SEM photograph. L, leaf. X 235 ......................... 57 17. Shoot apex of bona-nox in maximal phase in lateral view, with tip of leaf 2 removed. SEM photograph. L, leaf, X 230.......................... 57 18. Vigorous shoot tip of bona-nox with 10 tightly arranged leaf prlmordla In longitudinal median section. La, lamina; T, tendril; F, petiole; SA, shoot apex. X 34................................... 59 19. Shoot tip of bona-nox w ith 8 leaf primordla In longitudinal median section. Leaves numbered with leaf 1 being the youngest. X 38.................. 59 20. Shoot tip of pumila in longitudinal median section with 6 leaf primordla In the terminal bud. X 4 0 .................................................... 59 21. Shoot tip of smallll in longitudinal median section with 10 leaf primordla. Note primary thickening merlstem (PTM) below the shoot apex. X 4 1 ................................................ 59 22. Shoot apical merlstem of £. bona-nox showing first (T^) and second (T2 ) tunica layers and the corpus (C). A perlclinal division in the T2 layer Is indicated by the arrow. Longitudinal median section. X 380. ............................. 61 23. Shoot apical merlstem of S^. bona-nox In longitudinal median section with a new leaf forming a protuberance on the right flank
Recommended publications
  • Caterpillars Moths Butterflies Woodies
    NATIVE Caterpillars Moths and utter flies Band host NATIVE Hackberry Emperor oodies PHOTO : Megan McCarty W Double-toothed Prominent Honey locust Moth caterpillar Hackberry Emperor larva PHOTO : Douglas Tallamy Big Poplar Sphinx Number of species of Caterpillars n a study published in 2009, Dr. Oaks (Quercus) 557 Beeches (Fagus) 127 Honey-locusts (Gleditsia) 46 Magnolias (Magnolia) 21 Double-toothed Prominent ( Nerice IDouglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D, chair of the Cherries (Prunus) 456 Serviceberry (Amelanchier) 124 New Jersey Tea (Ceanothus) 45 Buttonbush (Cephalanthus) 19 bidentata ) larvae feed exclusively on elms Department of Entomology and Wildlife Willows (Salix) 455 Larches or Tamaracks (Larix) 121 Sycamores (Platanus) 45 Redbuds (Cercis) 19 (Ulmus), and can be found June through Ecology at the University of Delaware Birches (Betula) 411 Dogwoods (Cornus) 118 Huckleberry (Gaylussacia) 44 Green-briar (Smilax) 19 October. Their body shape mimics the specifically addressed the usefulness of Poplars (Populus) 367 Firs (Abies) 117 Hackberry (Celtis) 43 Wisterias (Wisteria) 19 toothed shape of American elm, making native woodies as host plants for our Crabapples (Malus) 308 Bayberries (Myrica) 108 Junipers (Juniperus) 42 Redbay (native) (Persea) 18 them hard to spot. The adult moth is native caterpillars (and obviously Maples (Acer) 297 Viburnums (Viburnum) 104 Elders (Sambucus) 42 Bearberry (Arctostaphylos) 17 small with a wingspan of 3-4 cm. therefore moths and butterflies). Blueberries (Vaccinium) 294 Currants (Ribes) 99 Ninebark (Physocarpus) 41 Bald cypresses (Taxodium) 16 We present here a partial list, and the Alders (Alnus) 255 Hop Hornbeam (Ostrya) 94 Lilacs (Syringa) 40 Leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne) 15 Honey locust caterpillar feeds on honey number of Lepidopteran species that rely Hickories (Carya) 235 Hemlocks (Tsuga) 92 Hollies (Ilex) 39 Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron) 15 locust, and Kentucky coffee trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Natural History ®
    FLORI'IDA MUSEUM BULLETIN OF NATURAL HISTORY ® A MIDDLE EOCENE FOSSIL PLANT ASSEMBLAGE (POWERS CLAY PIT) FROM WESTERN TENNESSEE DavidL. Dilcher and Terry A. Lott Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 1-43 2005 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE - The FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HiSTORY is Florida«'s state museum of natural history, dedicated to understanding, preser¥ingrand interpreting].biologica[1 diversity and culturafheritage. The BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA- MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is a peer-reviewed publication thatpziblishes.the result5 of origifial reseafchin zodlogy, botany, paleontology, and archaeology. Address all inquiries t6 the Managing Editor ofthe Bulletin. Numbers,ofthe Bulletin,afe,published,at itregular intervals. Specific volumes are not'necessarily completed in anyone year. The end of a volume willl·be noted at the foot of the first page ofthe last issue in that volume. Richard Franz, Managing Editor Erika H. Simons, Production BulletinCommittee Richard Franz,,Chairperson Ann Cordell Sarah Fazenbaker Richard Hulbert WilliamMarquardt Susan Milbrath Irvy R. Quitmyer - Scott Robinson, Ex 01#cio Afember ISSN: 0071-6154 Publication Date: October 31,2005 Send communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication and manustfipt queries to: Managing Editor of the BULLETIN Florida MuseumofNatural-History University offlorida PO Box 117800 Gainesville, FL 32611 -7800 U.S.A. Phone: 352-392-1721 Fax: 352-846-0287 e-mail: [email protected] A MIDDLE EOCENE FOSSIL PLANT ASSEMBLAGE (POWERS CLAY PIT) FROM WESTERN TENNESSEE David L. Dilcher and Terry A. Lottl ABSTRACT Plant megafossils are described, illustrated and discussed from Powers Clay Pit, occurring in the middle Eocene, Claiborne Group of the Mississippi Embayment in western Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Pliocene Smilax (Smilacaceae) Leaves from Southwest China: Phytogeo- Graphical and Paleoecological Implications
    ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Late Pliocene Smilax (Smilacaceae) leaves from Southwest China: Phytogeo- graphical and paleoecological implications Jing-Yu Wu, Yu-Sheng (Christopher) Liu, Su-Ting Ding, Jun Li, Peng- Cheng An PII: S0034-6667(16)30158-0 DOI: doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.02.006 Reference: PALBO 3841 To appear in: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology Received date: 26 August 2016 Revised date: 19 February 2017 Accepted date: 20 February 2017 Please cite this article as: Wu, Jing-Yu, Liu, Yu-Sheng (Christopher), Ding, Su-Ting, Li, Jun, An, Peng-Cheng, Late Pliocene Smilax (Smilacaceae) leaves from Southwest China: Phytogeographical and paleoecological implications, Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology (2017), doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.02.006 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Late Pliocene Smilax (Smilacaceae) leaves from Southwest China: phytogeographical and paleoecological implications Jing-Yu Wua,b*, Yu-Sheng (Christopher) Liuc, Su-Ting Dinga,b, Jun Lia, Peng-Cheng Ana a Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources in Western China (Gansu Province), School of Earth Sciences, and College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China b State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China cOffice of Research and Graduate Studies, Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA *Correspondence (Email: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Greenbrier (Catbrier) Family
    SMILACACEAE – GREENBRIER (CATBRIER) FAMILY Plant: mostly woody vines, some herbs and shrubs Stem: often with tendrils, spines common in some Root: often with tubers Leaves: evergreen, mostly simple, alternate (sometimes opposite) and entire; one veined or mostly 3-7 curved, parallel main veins with net veins between; tendrils often present, stipules present or not Flowers: mostly dioecious, some perfect; flower parts (tepals) in 3’s in 2 cycles of 6; stamens vary but often 6; ovary superior Fruit: berry, 1-6 but often 3 seeds Other: Carrion Flower is the only non-woody greenbrier in the area; Monocotyledons Group Genera: 3-12 (uncertain); locally Smilax (greenbrier or catbrier) WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive SMILACACEAE – GREENBRIER (CATBRIER) FAMILY Saw [Fringed] Greenbrier; Smilax bona-nox L. Upright Carrion-Flower; Smilax ecirrhata (Engelm. Ex Kunth) S. Watson Cat Greenbrier [Sawbrier]; Smilax glauca Walter Smooth Carrion-Flower; Smilax herbacea L. Illinois Greenbrier; Smilax illinoensis Mangaly Round Leaved [Common] Greenbrier; Smilax rotundifolia L. Bristly Greenbrier [Catbrier]; Smilax tamnoides L. Saw [Fringed] Greenbrier USDA Smilax bona-nox L. Smilacaceae (Greenbrier Family) Tybee Island, Georgia Notes: flower with 6 tepals, greenish; leaves alternate, simple, often hastate (arrowhead shaped) or at least with a deltoid base, leaf margins thickened and spinose, tip sharp-pointed; stem green, at least 1+ angled and spinose; fruits dark blue to black; late spring to summer
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Similax Vine? Q: in the Last Year, Smilax, Cat Briar, Or
    What is a Similax vine? Q: In the last year, smilax, cat briar, or blaspheme vine has become a real problem in my shrubs. Cutting the vines is only a very short relief, and the darn things seem immune to RoundUp. I want to kill them down to the bottom of the tuber. Suggestions? Photo courtesy Hans Hillewaert Smilax can be ornamental, but the thornier vines are more often just a nuisance. A: Smilax is a vine exquisitely adapted to the South and our Southern gardening habits. If we could only find a way to make use of it ... There are many species of smilax, and I can’t help but point out that some varieties of smilax, particularly the nearly thornless Jackson vine, are not only quite ornamental, but also quite delicious (the young stems are exceptional, like a nutty asparagus). The small trailing smilax of longleaf woodlands (Smilax pumila) is one of the most graceful and ornamental groundcovers for Southern yards. And coral greenbrier (Smilax walteri) produces some of the most beautiful fruits of any Southern vine. Yes, honest to goodness, I treasure some of my smilax. But there’s no denying: The thornier smilax vines, the ones with the more- or-less heart-shaped leaves, can be a nuisance. Once those leathery leaves harden off in spring, they won’t absorb common foliar herbicides such as RoundUp. And while the very young and soft leaves are susceptible to herbicide in March and early April, it can be hard to get them to absorb enough herbicide to carry it into the thick, underground root system.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvester Butterfly, Feniseca Tarquinius (Fabricius), Are the Only Strictly Carnivo- Rous Butterfly Caterpillars in the United States
    EENY-404 Harvester Butterfly, Feniseca tarquinius (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Melitinae)1 Donald W. Hall, Jerry F. Butler, and Marc Minno2 Introduction The larvae of the small, uncommon harvester butterfly, Feniseca tarquinius (Fabricius), are the only strictly carnivo- rous butterfly caterpillars in the United States. Distribution Found in swampy areas and woodlands, particularly near water, from southern Canada south to central Florida and central Texas. Highly localized with adults generally remaining in close proximity to woolly aphid hosts. DescriptionAdults The wings are orange on the interior, bordered with black on the dorsal surface and burnt-orange with darker spots edged with white on the ventral surface (Figure 1). Eggs The eggs are greenish-white and spherical with faint sculpturing (Figure 2). Figure 1. Adult harvester butterfly, Feniseca tarquinius (Fabricius). Credits: Donald W. Hall, UF/IFAS Larvae Pupae The larvae (Figures 3–5) are small (to 1.9 cm in length) The pupae are off-white and have a pattern that resembles and slug-like. Full-grown larvae are brightly patterned with the face of a lizard or monkey (Krizek 1995) (Figure 6). gray, yellow and white, and covered with bristly hairs; the pattern is often obscured with the white wax produced by the prey (Minno et al. 2005). 1. This document is EENY-404, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date April 2007. Revised December 2016. Reviewed November 2019. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication. This document is also available on the Featured Creatures website at http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Proclaimed Plant Policy
    Declared Plant Policy This policy relates to natural resources management under section 9(1)(d) of the Landscape South Australia Act 2019 (the Act), enabling co-ordinated implementation and promotion of sound management programs and practices for the use, development or protection of natural resources of the State. Specifically, this policy provides guidance on the use and management of natural resources relating to the prevention or control of impacts caused by pest species of plants that may have an adverse effect on the environment, primary production or the community, as per object s7(1)(f) of the Act. bridal creeper (Asparagus asparagoides) Bridal creeper is a winter-growing, summer-dormant climbing perennial. It is widespread in South Australia, invading a wide range of native vegetation communities. Two forms of bridal creeper (known as common and Western Cape) have been found in South Australia and require different management approaches. Management Plan for Bridal Creeper Outcomes • Protect the integrity of native vegetation by preventing further spread and minimising the impacts of existing bridal creeper infestations. Objectives • Contain existing infestations to prevent spread into uninvaded areas. • Control bridal creeper at sites of high conservation significance. • Control priority infestations in accordance with landscape board regional management plans. Best Practice Implementation • Redistribution of biological control agents, where required for priority sites. • Prohibition on sale of bridal creeper is to be enforced, as detected by regional landscape boards. • Identification and strategic control of outlier infestations. • Management of core infestations of bridal creeper to protect high value natural assets/areas of conservation significance. • Extension to raise awareness of the two forms of bridal creeper and the differences in management approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Honduran Smilax L. (Zarzaparrilla) (Liliales, Smilacaceae)
    0844 Honduran Smilax L. (zarzaparrilla) (Liliales, Smilacaceae): an estimate of the amount of plants required for the Boston 1855 exports Donald L. Hazlett New World Plants & People Pierce, Colorado, United States of America Lilian Ferrufino -Acosta Herbario Cyril Hardy Nelson Sutherland, Escuela de Biología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras Tegucigalpa, Honduras Fecha de publicación: Febrero 15, 2019 Donald L. Hazlett & Lilian Ferrufino-Acosta Honduran Smilax L. (zarzaparrilla) (Liliales, Smilacaceae): an estimate of the amount of plants required for the Boston 1855 exports Ceiba 0844: 1–8 DOI: 10.5377/ceiba.v0i0844.5826 Publicado en el 2019 por Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano P.O. Box 93 Km 30 Tegucigalpa a Danlí, San Antonio de Oriente, Francisco Morazán, Honduras Ceiba es la revista científica y tecnológica de la Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano, publicada desde 1950. A partir del 2019, Ceiba se publica exclusivamente de manera electrónica y en el formato de publicación continua; esto con el propósito de acortar el tiempo entre aceptación de un artículo y su publicación y que los autores puedan diseminar rápidamente los resultados de su investigación. Aceptamos artículos en español o en inglés relacionados con todas las áreas de la agricultura: agricultura tropical, recursos naturales, botánica, biología, ecología, desarrollo rural, forestales, economía agrícola, agronegocios, descripciones de nuevas especies, agroindustria, protección vegetal, notas científicas (plagas nuevas, observaciones interesantes) y resúmenes de tesis de los estudiantes de la Escuela Agrícola Panamericana. Ocasionalmente se publicarán revisiones bibliográficas y resúmenes de conferencias. Los artículos para ser considerados para publicación tienen que ser originales y no deben haber sido publicados ni sometidos a otras revistas.
    [Show full text]
  • Smilax Herbacea L. Common Names: Common Carrion-Flower, Jacob's-Ladder, Smooth Carrion-Flower (1,3)
    Smilax herbacea L. Common Names: Common carrion-flower, Jacob's-ladder, Smooth carrion-flower (1,3). Etymology: The word “Smilax” was cited (1) as Greek for clasping, while “herbacea” signifies herbaceous, not woody (1). Botanical synonyms: Nemexia herbacea (L.) Small (2) FAMILY: Smilacaceae (the Catbrier family) Quick Notable Features: ¬ Carrion (rotten meat) scented flowers ¬ Unarmed stems ¬ Leaves glabrous and glaucous beneath Plant Height: S. herbacea is reported to grow to be as high as 2.1m tall (1). Subspecies/varieties recognized (5,7): Smilax herbacea var. herbacea Smilax herbacea var. lasioneuron Smilax herbacea var. pulverulenta Most Likely Confused with: Any of the other local species of Smilax: Smilax ecirrata, Smilax glauca, Smilax hispida, Smilax lasioneura, Smilax pulverulenta, Smilax rotundifolia, Smilax walteri, as well as Dioscorea spp, Menispermum spp.. Habitat Preference: S. herbacea is found in rich or alluvial thickets, meadows and low woods, as well as along fencerows and roadsides. It is found in moist deciduous to coniferous-deciduous woods and thickets (1,4,5,6,7,8). Geographic Distribution in Michigan: S. herbacea has only been confirmed in two counties of the southern lower peninsula of Michigan (3). Known Elevational Distribution: 100-800m (11). Complete Geographic Distribution: Native to North America. Found as far north as Ontario and as far south as Georgia. Also found from the eastern coast of N. America as far west as Kansas (3). Vegetative Plant Description: S. herbacea is an herbaceous vine that climbs as high as 2.1m tall, is completely unarmed, and is often freely branched. The branches are either round or 1 many ridged.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to Nine Common Smilax Species of Florida1 Lynn Proenza and Michael Andreu2
    FOR307 Key to Nine Common Smilax Species of Florida1 Lynn Proenza and Michael Andreu2 Family Due to the small range and rarity of S. havanensis (listed as threatened by the state of Florida), and the small range of S. Smilacaceae ecirrhata and S. lasioneuron (found only in a few counties in the panhandle), we will not include these three species. Genus Smilax (catbrier, greenbrier, sarsaparilla) The descriptions below list the ranges and habitats in which each species occurs along with their physical character- istics. The descriptions include a summary of distinctive Introduction characteristics that may prove helpful in differentiating Identifying species found in Smilax the genus can be between species and identifying them correctly. Frequently, difficult because species resemble one another closely. One leaf shape or color will vary on an individual plant, so it must be careful to use detailed descriptions in order to is important to look at more than one leaf or common correctly identify a specimen. Smilax species are important characteristic to ensure proper identification. because they can provide shelter and food for wildlife and have provided humans with medicine, food, and dyes. Florida contains many different plant communities (habi- Twelve Smilax species are found in Florida. This document tats) in which Smilax species occur. Descriptions of these covers the nine more common species that one may natural plant communities are found in the Guide to the encounter in the state. These include: Natural Communities of Florida (2010 edition), created by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). • S. auriculata; earleaf greenbrier • S. bona-nox; saw greenbrier Common Traits of the Smilax • S.
    [Show full text]
  • Saw Greenbrier Scientific Name: Smilax Bona-Nox Order
    Common Name: Saw Greenbrier Scientific Name: Smilax bona-nox Order: Liliales Family: Smilacaceae Wetland Plant Status: Facultative Ecology & Description Saw greenbrier is shrubby vine this is a warm season perennial plant. The native deciduous plant supports long, heart-shaped leaves that fall during the fall and winter months and bloom in late winter and early spring. The stems are climbing with tendrils and tend to form thick, intertwined mottles that cannot be penetrated by livestock. Whether there is full sunlight or full shade, this vine is capable of exceeding 20 feet in length. Habitat Saw greenbrier occurs in dry, wet woods and thickets. It enjoys disturbed sites such as clear cuts, fencerows and fields that obtain a wide variety of soils such as rocky soils, loams and saturated swamp soils with a high organic matter content. Distribution Saw greenbrier exists throughout the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain, ranging from Texas to Indiana and from Virginia to Florida. Native/Invasive Status Saw greenbrier is native to the lower 48 states in the United States. It is, however, also considered to be invasive in some areas. Wildlife Uses This species is attractive to bees, butterflies and different species of birds. By animal dispersed seeds, site characteristics of saw greenbrier are very common along the southeast. Black bear (Ursus americanus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), grouse, and several bird species feed on the fruit that remains on the plants throughout the winter. White- tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and various rabbit species will also feed on the leaves and stems during the growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarsaparilla Landen Straub and Annie Opel Introduction
    Sarsaparilla Landen Straub and Annie Opel Introduction Sarsaparilla is an aromatic flavoring agent from Central and South America. It is made from the dried roots of tropical vines of the Smilax genus in the lily family Liliaceae. It has been used to flavor soft drinks like root beer and it also has medicinal properties. Origin ● Originates from Central and South America ○ southern and western coasts of Mexico to Peru ○ Used by natives for beverages and herbal medicine long before Columbus ● Brought to Europe by Spaniards in 1530 ● Touted as a depurative of great power, efficacy in cleansing the body of corrupt humors, sweetening the blood, and removing diseases through liquid disposal ● Name originates from the Spanish word “zarzaparilla” ● Not only important as a medicine, sarsaparilla was equally sought after throughout the world for uses in beverages. ● Genus Smilax has 260 species of climbing vines Physical Description Of Smilax plants ● Perennial monocots ● Form evergreen shrubs with vines that climb ● Different species used for different things; some used in medicine, others in beverages dependent on factors like: ○ texture ○ chemical composition, ○ taste, essential oils, etc. ● Species of Smilax used: ○ officinalis ○ ornata ○ glabra ○ regelii ○ japicanga Artist’s Rendition Life Stages of Smilax ornata Smilax ornata roots Root typically knotty, tuberous growing obliquely in the ground Smilax ornata plant composed of many thin fleshy Smilax ornata flowers Leaves have pair of basal, Flowers dioecious and are fibers spiralling tendrils held in umbels History of Preparation ● 18th century: it was often used in medicinal syrups with active ingredients iodide and mercury, giving credit to sarsaparilla ● 19th Century: Syrups become popular in America and ● 1830: Recognized by U.S.
    [Show full text]