DOCSLIB.ORG

Lepomis Macrochirus and Gambusia Affinis)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1989 Palatability of Freshwater Surface Hemiptera to Potential Fish Predators (Lepomis macrochirus and Gambusia affinis) Julie Heyward Mounts College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Mounts, Julie Heyward, "Palatability of Freshwater Surface Hemiptera to Potential Fish Predators (Lepomis macrochirus and Gambusia affinis)" (1989). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625502. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-6msd-y891 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PALATABILITY OF FRESHWATER SURFACE HEMIPTERA TO POTENTIAL FISH PREDATORS (LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS AND GAMBUSIA AFFINIS) A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Julie Heyward Mounts 1989 ProQuest Number: 10628126 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10628126 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS '// A a ' Julie Heyward Mounts Approved, October 1989 Grego^fr M/ Capelli, CMirman Garnett R. Brooks a ht'l ^Norman J . Rarshing ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLE DGEMENTS i v LIST OF TABLES........................................... v LIST OF FIGURES.......................................... vii ABSTRACT.................................................. viii INTRODUCTION...................................... 2 GENERAL SURVEY AND IDENTIFICATION....................... 7 MATERIALS AND METHODS.................................... 13 RESULTS................................................... 19 DISCUSSION................................................ 40 LITERATURE CITED......................................... 44 VITA...................................................... 46 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my gratitude and appreciation to my committee chairman, Dr. Gregory M. Capelli, under whose direction this research was conducted, for his guidance and constructive criticism. I am also grateful to Drs. Garnett R. Brooks and Norman J. Fashing who served on my committee and critically reviewed this manuscript, providing valuable comments and support. I thank Mrs. Jewel Thomas for helping to photograph the insects pictured in this manuscript and providing slides of the insects and tables used in the oral presentation. A special thank you is extended to my husband for his continual help and encouragement, and to my parents and brother for their support. iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Prey item information.......................... 8 2. Responses of Gambusia affinis to prey items... 21 3. Responses of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus to prey items 2 4 4. Responses of adult Lepomis macrochirus to prey items in 198 8 2 6 5. Mean number of Gambusia affinis attacks per prey item. Size classes of fish and replicate experiments from different years are combined. 2 7 6. Mean number of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus attacks per prey item. Size classes of fish and replicate experiments from different years are combined 2 8 7. Total number of prey items eaten by Gambusia affinis as a function of size class. Data from replicate experiments combined 3 0 8. Total number of prey items eaten by juvenile Lepomis macrochirus as a function of size class. Data from replicate experiments combined...... 31 9. Stomach analysis results for Gambusia affinis (8/15/88). Data expressed as percent of fish containing the item, for various times of day. 3 3 10. Stomach analysis results for Gambusia affinis (8/22/88). Data expressed as percent of fish containing the item, for various times of day. 3 4 11. Stomach analysis results for Gambusia affinis (9/25/88). Data expressed as percent of fish containing the item, for various times of day. 3 5 12. Stomach analysis results for juvenile Lepomis macrochirus in 1988. Data expressed as percent of fish containing the item. ............... 38 v 13. Stomach analysis results for adult Lepomis macrochirus in 1988. Data expressed as percent of fish containing the item................... 39 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page la. Trepobates inermis (adult-left, nymph-right) lb. Rheumatobates palosi............................ 9 2a. Rheumatobates tenuipes 2b. Gerris marginatus............................... 10 3a. Mesovelia mulsanti 3b. Microvelia americana............................ 11 4. Microvelia pulchella............................ 12 5. Experimental tank set-up........................ 14 6a. Typical contents of a Gambusia affinis stomach including several Diptera larva. 6b. Gambusia affinis stomach containing nymphal Trepobates inermis.............................. 32 7. Typical contents of a juvenile Lepomis macrochirus stomach containing Diptera larva and several small Pelecypoda 3 7 vii ABSTRACT Using laboratory experiments, I determined the palatability of eight species of freshwater surface Hemiptera to potential fish predators (Lepomis macrochirus - bluegill, and Gambusia affinis - gambusia). Species tested included five from the family Gerridae (Trepobates inermis, Rheumatobates palosi, Rheumatobates tenuipes. Gerris marginatus. and Gerris remiais), one from the family Mesoveliidae (Mesovelia mulsanti), and two from the family Veliidae (Microvelia americana and Microvelia pulchella). Field collections of gambusia and bluegill were also made to determine by stomach analysis the importance of surface Hemiptera in their diet. The Gerridae tested were palatable to gambusia and bluegill but both Veliidae were unpalatable to both fish species. Results for Mesovelia mulsanti were mixed: gambusia rejected them while bluegill ate them. Stomach analyses indicated that surface Hemiptera are probably at most only an incidental and sporadic part of fish diets. viii PALATABILITY OF FRESHWATER SURFACE HEMIPTERA TO POTENTIAL FISH PREDATORS (LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS AND GAMBUSIA AFFINIS) INTRODUCTION For many years ecologists have focused on predation as a major factor in the structure of communities, including aquatic ones. One aspect of predation, the unpalatability of the prey as a possible defensive mechanism in aquatic environments, has not received much attention until recently (Kerfoot 1982). Whirligig beetles (Gyrinidae) (Benfield 1972), predaceous diving beetles (Dytiscidae) (Schildknect et al. 1966), and aposematically colored water mites (Arachnoides) have been found unpalatable to fish (Kerfoot 1982). Two species of Hemiptera have also been found distasteful to fish in direct feeding experiments: pygmy backswimmers - Plea strida (Pleidae) (Kerfoot 1982) and Velia caprai (Veliidae) (Bronmark et al. 1984). In addition, suspected multifunctional compounds (possible sexual attractants, alarm substances, defensive compounds) have been isolated and identified for eight species among the aquatic Hemiptera families Notonectidae, Corixidae, Belastomatidae, Naucoridae, Pleidae, and Gelatotrichidae (Scrimshaw and Kerfoot 1987). Various semi-aquatic Hemiptera of the suborder Heteroptera, infraorder Gerromorpha occupy the surface (neustonic) zone of fresh, brackish, and salt water. These 2 3 insects are often an abundant and very visible component of shallow, near-shore freshwater communities. Preliminary observations indicated that Lake Matoaka and other freshwater lakes and streams in the Williamsburg vicinity contained typical representatives, including the families Gerridae (water striders), Veliidae (broad shouldered water striders), and Mesovellidae (water treaders). Two species of fish are common in the same general habitats: Gambusia affinis (gambusia) and juvenile Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill). Gambusia are generalists feeding on a wide variety of items including mosquito larvae and pupae, copepods, algae, and small fish (Carlander 1969, Flemer and Woolcott 1966). Juvenile bluegill feed on aquatic insects and smaller Crustacea while adults, which generally occur in somewhat deeper water, feed mainly on aquatic insects, small crayfish, and small fish (Carlander 1977). In a review of prior studies Anderson (1982a) listed hunting spiders, damselflies, backswimmers, pelagic fish, frogs, and surface feeding birds as potential predators of surface Hemiptera, but presented no firm evidence. Many surface Hemiptera are known to be cannibalistic, feeding on vulnerable nymphs and smaller individuals (Anderson 1982a). A review of the literature on gambusia and bluegill stomach analyses reveals sporadic and infrequent
Recommended publications
  • Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) in Central Europe

    Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) in Central Europe

    Shortened web version University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Faculty of Science Ecology of Veliidae and Mesoveliidae (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) in Central Europe RNDr. Tomáš Ditrich Ph.D. Thesis Supervisor: Prof. RNDr. Miroslav Papáček, CSc. University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Education České Budějovice 2010 Shortened web version Ditrich, T., 2010: Ecology of Veliidae and Mesoveliidae (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) in Central Europe. Ph.D. Thesis, in English. – 85 p., Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Annotation Ecology of Veliidae and Mesoveliidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) was studied in selected European species. The research of these non-gerrid semiaquatic bugs was especially focused on voltinism, overwintering with physiological consequences and wing polymorphism with dispersal pattern. Hypotheses based on data from field surveys were tested by laboratory, mesocosm and field experiments. New data on life history traits and their ecophysiological consequences are discussed in seven original research papers (four papers published in peer-reviewed journals, one paper accepted to publication, one submitted paper and one communication in a conference proceedings), creating core of this thesis. Keywords Insects, semiaquatic bugs, life history, overwintering, voltinism, dispersion, wing polymorphism. Financial support This thesis was mainly supported by grant of The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic No. MSM 6007665801, partially by grant of the Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia No. GAJU 6/2007/P-PřF, by The Research Council of Norway: The YGGDRASIL mobility program No. 195759/V11 and by Czech Science Foundation grant No. 206/07/0269. Shortened web version Declaration I hereby declare that I worked out this Ph.D.
  • The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Donald V

    The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Donald V

    The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Donald V. Bennett Edwin F. Cook Technical Bulletin 332-1981 Agricultural Experiment Station University of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ...................................3 Key to Adults of Nearctic Families of Semiaquatic Hemiptera ................... 6 Family Saldidae-Shore Bugs ............... 7 Family Mesoveliidae-Water Treaders .......18 Family Hebridae-Velvet Water Bugs .......20 Family Hydrometridae-Marsh Treaders, Water Measurers ...22 Family Veliidae-Small Water striders, Rime bugs ................24 Family Gerridae-Water striders, Pond skaters, Wherry men .....29 Family Ochteridae-Velvety Shore Bugs ....35 Family Gelastocoridae-Toad Bugs ..........36 Literature Cited ..............................37 Figures ......................................44 Maps .........................................55 Index to Scientific Names ....................59 Acknowledgement Sincere appreciation is expressed to the following individuals: R. T. Schuh, for being extremely helpful in reviewing the section on Saldidae, lending specimens, and allowing use of his illustrations of Saldidae; C. L. Smith for reading the section on Veliidae, checking identifications, and advising on problems in the taxon­ omy ofthe Veliidae; D. M. Calabrese, for reviewing the section on the Gerridae and making helpful sugges­ tions; J. T. Polhemus, for advising on taxonomic prob­ lems and checking identifications for several families; C. W. Schaefer, for providing advice and editorial com­ ment; Y. A. Popov, for sending a copy ofhis book on the Nepomorpha; and M. C. Parsons, for supplying its English translation. The University of Minnesota, including the Agricultural Experi­ ment Station, is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, or handicap. The information given in this publication is for educational purposes only.
  • Laboulbeniomycetes, Eni... Historyâ

    Laboulbeniomycetes, Eni... Historyâ

    Laboulbeniomycetes, Enigmatic Fungi With a Turbulent Taxonomic History☆ Danny Haelewaters, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States; Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Universidad Autónoma ̌ de Chiriquí, David, Panama; and University of South Bohemia, Ceské Budejovice,̌ Czech Republic Michał Gorczak, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland Patricia Kaishian, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States and State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, United States André De Kesel, Meise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meredith Blackwell, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States and University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States r 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Roland Thaxter to the Present: Synergy Among Mycologists, Entomologists, Parasitologists Laboulbeniales were discovered in the middle of the 19th century, rather late in mycological history (Anonymous, 1849; Rouget, 1850; Robin, 1852, 1853; Mayr, 1853). After their discovery and eventually their recognition as fungi, occasional reports increased species numbers and broadened host ranges and geographical distributions; however, it was not until the fundamental work of Thaxter (1896, 1908, 1924, 1926, 1931), who made numerous collections but also acquired infected insects from correspondents, that the Laboulbeniales became better known among mycologists and entomologists. Thaxter set the stage for progress by describing a remarkable number of taxa: 103 genera and 1260 species. Fewer than 25 species of Pyxidiophora in the Pyxidiophorales are known. Many have been collected rarely, often described from single collections and never encountered again. They probably are more common and diverse than known collections indicate, but their rapid development in hidden habitats and difficulty of cultivation make species of Pyxidiophora easily overlooked and, thus, underreported (Blackwell and Malloch, 1989a,b; Malloch and Blackwell, 1993; Jacobs et al., 2005; Gams and Arnold, 2007).
  • Building-Up of a DNA Barcode Library for True Bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany Reveals Taxonomic Uncertainties and Surprises

    Building-Up of a DNA Barcode Library for True Bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany Reveals Taxonomic Uncertainties and Surprises

    Building-Up of a DNA Barcode Library for True Bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany Reveals Taxonomic Uncertainties and Surprises Michael J. Raupach1*, Lars Hendrich2*, Stefan M. Ku¨ chler3, Fabian Deister1,Je´rome Morinie`re4, Martin M. Gossner5 1 Molecular Taxonomy of Marine Organisms, German Center of Marine Biodiversity (DZMB), Senckenberg am Meer, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, 2 Sektion Insecta varia, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB – ZSM), Mu¨nchen, Germany, 3 Department of Animal Ecology II, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany, 4 Taxonomic coordinator – Barcoding Fauna Bavarica, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB – ZSM), Mu¨nchen, Germany, 5 Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universita¨tMu¨nchen, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany Abstract During the last few years, DNA barcoding has become an efficient method for the identification of species. In the case of insects, most published DNA barcoding studies focus on species of the Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Hymenoptera and especially Lepidoptera. In this study we test the efficiency of DNA barcoding for true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera), an ecological and economical highly important as well as morphologically diverse insect taxon. As part of our study we analyzed DNA barcodes for 1742 specimens of 457 species, comprising 39 families of the Heteroptera. We found low nucleotide distances with a minimum pairwise K2P distance ,2.2% within 21 species pairs (39 species). For ten of these species pairs (18 species), minimum pairwise distances were zero. In contrast to this, deep intraspecific sequence divergences with maximum pairwise distances .2.2% were detected for 16 traditionally recognized and valid species. With a successful identification rate of 91.5% (418 species) our study emphasizes the use of DNA barcodes for the identification of true bugs and represents an important step in building-up a comprehensive barcode library for true bugs in Germany and Central Europe as well.
  • Microsoft Outlook

    Microsoft Outlook

    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
  • Predator Strike Shapes Antipredator Phenotype Through New Genetic Interactions in Water Striders

    Predator Strike Shapes Antipredator Phenotype Through New Genetic Interactions in Water Striders

    ARTICLE Received 26 May 2015 | Accepted 23 Jul 2015 | Published 1 Sep 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9153 OPEN Predator strike shapes antipredator phenotype through new genetic interactions in water striders David Armise´n1,*, Peter Nagui Refki1,*, Antonin Jean Johan Crumie`re1,Se´verine Viala1, William Toubiana1 & Abderrahman Khila1 How novel genetic interactions evolve, under what selective pressures, and how they shape adaptive traits is often unknown. Here we uncover behavioural and developmental genetic mechanisms that enable water striders to survive attacks by bottom-striking predators. Long midlegs, critical for antipredator strategy, are shaped through a lineage-specific interaction between the Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and a new target gene called gilt. The differences in leg morphologies are established through modulation of gilt differential expression between mid and hindlegs under Ubx control. Furthermore, short-legged water striders, generated through gilt RNAi knockdown, exhibit reduced performance in predation tests. Therefore, the evolution of the new Ubx–gilt interaction contributes to shaping the legs that enable water striders to dodge predator strikes. These data show how divergent selection, associated with novel prey–predator interactions, can favour the evolution of new genetic interactions and drive adaptive evolution. 1 Institut de Ge´nomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, CNRS-UMR5242, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, Universite´ Claude Bernard, 46 Alle´e d’Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.K. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 6:8153 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9153 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
  • Morphological Study of the Antennal Sensilla in Gerromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera)

    Morphological Study of the Antennal Sensilla in Gerromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera)

    Title: Morphological study of the antennal sensilla in Gerromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Author: Agnieszka Nowińska, Jolanta Brożek Citation style: Nowińska Agnieszka, Brożek Jolanta. (2017). Morphological study of the antennal sensilla in Gerromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera). "Zoomorphology" (vol. 136, iss. 3 (2017), s. 327-347), doi 10.1007/s00435-017-0354-y Zoomorphology (2017) 136:327–347 DOI 10.1007/s00435-017-0354-y ORIGINAL PAPER Morphological study of the antennal sensilla in Gerromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) 1 1 A. Nowin´ska • J. Brozek_ Received: 23 January 2017 / Revised: 10 April 2017 / Accepted: 11 April 2017 / Published online: 28 April 2017 Ó The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The external morphology and distribution of the The antennae of Gerromorpha belong to the same antennal sensilla of 21 species from five families of morphological type as those found in other heteropteran semiaquatic bugs (Gerromorpha) were examined using insects. The scapus and pecicel are one antennomer while scanning electron microscopy. Nine main types were dis- the flagellum consists of four antennomers (Andersen tinguished based on their morphological structure: sensilla 1982; Schuh and Slater 1995). A significant part of the trichoidea, sensilla chaetica, sensilla leaflike, sensilla sensory system of insects consists of a large number of campaniformia, sensilla coeloconica, sensilla ampullacea, highly diverse organs called sensilla. These sensory organs sensilla basiconica, sensilla placoidea and sensilla bell- are located in the antennae, mouthparts (labium, labial and mouthed. The specific morphological structure of one type maxillary palps and proboscis (a food-sucking tubular of sensilla (bell-mouthed sensilla) was observed only in appendage), genitalia, legs and wings (Peregrine 1972; Aquarius paludum.
  • Aquatic Insects

    Aquatic Insects

    AQUATIC INSECTS Challenges to Populations This page intentionally left blank AQUATIC INSECTS Challenges to Populations Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 24th Symposium Edited by Jill Lancaster Institute of Evolutionary Biology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK and Robert A. Briers School of Life Sciences Napier University Edinburgh, UK CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI North American Offi ce Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org CAB International 2008. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Royal Entomological Society of London. Symposium (24th : 2007 : University of Edinburgh) Aquatic insects : challenges to populations : proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 24th symposium / edited by Jill Lancaster, Rob A. Briers. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-84593-396-8 (alk. paper) 1. Aquatic insects--Congresses. I. Lancaster, Jill. II. Briers, Rob A. III. Title. QL472.R69 2007 595.7176--dc22 2008000626 ISBN: 978 1 84593 396 8 Typeset by AMA Dataset, Preston, UK Printed and bound in the UK by Cromwell Press, Trowbridge The paper used for the text pages in this book is FSC certifi ed.
  • Journal of Cave and Karst Studies

    Journal of Cave and Karst Studies

    June 2020 Volume 82, Number 2 JOURNAL OF ISSN 1090-6924 A Publication of the National CAVE AND KARST Speleological Society STUDIES DEDICATED TO THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, EDUCATION, EXPLORATION, AND CONSERVATION Published By BOARD OF EDITORS The National Speleological Society Anthropology George Crothers http://caves.org/pub/journal University of Kentucky Lexington, KY Office [email protected] 6001 Pulaski Pike NW Huntsville, AL 35810 USA Conservation-Life Sciences Julian J. Lewis & Salisa L. Lewis Tel:256-852-1300 Lewis & Associates, LLC. [email protected] Borden, IN [email protected] Editor-in-Chief Earth Sciences Benjamin Schwartz Malcolm S. Field Texas State University National Center of Environmental San Marcos, TX Assessment (8623P) [email protected] Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Leslie A. North 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, KY Washington, DC 20460-0001 [email protected] 703-347-8601 Voice 703-347-8692 Fax [email protected] Mario Parise University Aldo Moro Production Editor Bari, Italy [email protected] Scott A. Engel Knoxville, TN Carol Wicks 225-281-3914 Louisiana State University [email protected] Baton Rouge, LA [email protected] Exploration Paul Burger National Park Service Eagle River, Alaska [email protected] Microbiology Kathleen H. Lavoie State University of New York Plattsburgh, NY [email protected] Paleontology Greg McDonald National Park Service Fort Collins, CO The Journal of Cave and Karst Studies , ISSN 1090-6924, CPM [email protected] Number #40065056, is a multi-disciplinary, refereed journal pub- lished four times a year by the National Speleological Society.
  • Spatial Distribution of Semiaquatic Bugs (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha

    Spatial Distribution of Semiaquatic Bugs (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha

    Silva Gabreta vol. 14 (3) p. 173–178 Vimperk, 2008 Spatial distribution of semiaquatic bugs (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) and their wing morphs in a small scale of the Pohořský Potok stream spring area (Novohradské Hory Mts.) Tomáš Ditrich1,2,*, Miroslav Papáček1 & Tomáš Broum3 1Department of Biology, Pedagogical Faculty, University of South Bohemia, Jeronýmova 10, CZ-37115 České Budějovice, Czech Republic 2Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic 3Větrná 603, CZ-43151 Klášterec nad Ohří, Czech Republic *[email protected] Abstract A survey of semiaquatic bugs (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) was managed in a small scale area (72 ha; spring area of Pohořský Potok stream, Novohradské Hory Mts., Czech Republic, Central Europe). Species compo- sition of assemblages and rates of their pteromorphs were observed in the relation to selected environmen- tal characteristics – stream velocity, site permanence, water surface coverage and site shading. Gerris gibbifer Schummel, 1832, Gerris lateralis Schummel, 1832 and Velia caprai Tamanini, 1947 are dominant gerromorphan species in the study area. Gerris species are univoltine; bivoltinism of Veliidae species can- not be excluded in this area. A redundancy analysis showed significant effect of stream velocity, site shading and site permanence on species and wing morphs composition of assemblages. Velia caprai mostly occur in shaded habitats with flowing water, whereas other species prefer still water bodies. Gerris lateralis pre- fers shaded sites as the only gerrid. Occurrence of wing morphs of the only notably wing dimorphic speci- es G. lateralis in the study area depends on site permanence. Permanent water bodies are occupied by both macropterous and apterous specimens, temporary sites are almost exclusively colonized by macropterous individuals.
  • Water Bug Family

    Water Bug Family

    Draft keys to the Water Bug families of Great Britain and Ireland Kev Rowley Photographs by A.A.Cook Draft 0.6 : July 2018 All comments welcomed to [email protected] Based on Nau, B.S., (2010) Keys to Aquatic & Semi-aquatic Heteroptera. Draft. Habitat information from: • Denton, Jonty, (2007), Water Bugs and Beetles of Surrey. Surrey Wildlife Atlas Project. • Southward, T.R.E., & Leston, D., (1959). Land and Water bugs of the British Isles. Warne, London. Other key sources from: • Brooke, S., Nau, B., & Stanier, H., (2012), Wildlife profiles: Water Bugs. Wildlife Trust BCN. • Cook, A. A., (2015), A review of the Hemiptera of Great Britain. The aquatic and semi-aquatic bugs. Natural England commissioned report NECR188. • Eversham, B., & Prunier, F., (2003), Identifying water bugs. Wildlife Trust BCNP. • Jansson, A., (1986),The Corixidae (Heteroptera) of Europe and some adjacent regions. Acta Entomologica Fennica 47:1-94. • Merritt, R., (2006), Atlas of the water beetles (coleoptera) and water bugs (Hemiptera) of Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire and South Yorkshire, 1993-2005. Sorby Record Special Series, No.14. • Savage, A.A., (1989), Adults of the British aquatic Hemiptera Heteroptera: a key with ecological notes. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No.50. For more information on species, habitat and distribution refer to www.aquaticbugs.com Keys to Water Bug families of Great Britain and Ireland. Draft 0.6 Page 1 ORDER: HEMIPTERA. SUB ORDER: HETEROPTERA 1a Antennae shorter than head and hidden beneath it so not visible from above. No silver water proof hairs underneath abdomen although hairs maybe present to trap air. Underwater species …………………………… 2 Caution: In species with antennae these may be accidentally wrapped under the head out of sight.
  • Inventory of the Water Striders of the Lower Illinois River Basin

    Inventory of the Water Striders of the Lower Illinois River Basin

    INVENTORY OF THE WATER STRIDERS OF THE LOWER ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN Steven J. Taylor Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity Champaign, Illinois Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity Technical Report 1999(25) Prepared for Natural Heritage Division, Illinois Department of Natural Resources Springfield, Illinois December 1999 i Introduction The insect suborder Gerromorpha (Insecta : Heteroptera) includes the water striders (Gerridae) and four other families (Hebridae, Hydrometridae, Mesoveliidae, and Veliidae) occurring in Illinois. These animals inhabit the surface film of both lotic and lentic waters, where they are predators and scavengers feeding upon insects trapped in the surface film . The biology, ecology, and distribution of Illinois Gerromorpha were the subject of my recent (Taylor 1996) dissertation . Currently, additional specimens are being collected to obtain more data on species distributions and habitats in Illinois . Data presented here will ultimately be published with more comprehensive distribution maps and keys to the species of the state . Objectives This study had four primary objectives : • To conduct a faunal inventory of the Gerromorpha in six counties in the lower Illinois • River basin and adjoining parts of the Lincoln Hills . • To produce updated statewide distribution maps for all gerromorphan species in the study area. • To produce a faunal list of gerromorphan species in the study area. • To compile information on microhabitat and species associations for gerromorphan species found in the study area . Methods Field collections were conducted three multi-day trips to Brown, Calhoun, Greene, Jersey, Pike, and Scott counties : early Spring (16 March 1999), late Spring (7-9 May 1999), and Autumn (21-23 September 1999) .