Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Functional Troy Gerald Konshak Iowa State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Functional Troy Gerald Konshak Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2005 Non-Cartesian distributed approximating functional Troy Gerald Konshak Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Mathematics Commons, and the Physical Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Konshak, Troy Gerald, "Non-Cartesian distributed approximating functional " (2005). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 1747. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/1747 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. ® UMI Non-Cartesian distributed approximating functional by Troy Gerald Konshak A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Physical Chemistry Program of Study Committee: David K. Hoffman, Major Professor Mark S. Gordon James W. Evans William S. Jenks Xueyu Song Iowa State University Ames, Iowa •2005 Copyright © Troy Gerald Konshak, 2005. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 3200434 Copyright 2005 by Konshak, Troy Gerald All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3200434 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation of Troy Gerald Konshak has met the dissertation requirements of Iowa State University Signature was redacted for privacy. Committee Member Signature was redacted for privacy. Commi; Mej Signature was redacted for privacy. Committee Member Signature was redacted for privacy. Member Signature was redacted for privacy. Majop Professor Signature was redacted for privacy. For the Major Program This work is dedicated to my wife and son who have proven that it is possible to have both a family and a Ph.D. iv Contents List of Acronyms ix Mathematical Notation x List of Common Symbols xiii Abstract xvi 1 Introduction 1 2 Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Functionals as Constrained Minimum States of the Heisenberg Total Uncertainty Product 8 2.1 Heisenberg Total Uncertainty Product 10 2.2 Minimum Uncertainty States of the Heisenberg Total Uncertainty Product 16 2.3 Constrained Minimum Uncertainty States of the Heisenberg Total Uncertainty Product 26 2.4 Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Functional 38 Appendix 2A: Phase and Normalization of Gaussian State in Position Domain 44 Appendix 2B: Possibility of Non-Negative Valued Initial Change Functions 47 Appendix 2C: Points of Inflection, Rapid Transition, and Maximum Curvature in the NCDAF Momentum Window 49 Appendix 2D: Square Variance in Position and Momentum of the NCDAF 53 Figures 58 3 The Properties of the Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Functional Poly­ nomials and Minimum Uncertainty Wavelets 70 3.1 Identification and Characterization of the NCDAF Polynomials 71 3.1.1 First Few [Z]zl1D/2~1+0(Z2) 78 3.1.2 Recursion and Derivative Relationships of [Z]1 (Z2) 78 V 3.1.3 Vàluea of at ^ = 0 83 3.1.4 Orthogonality of [Z]1lI?^2 1+l\z2) 84 3.1.5 Completeness of [Z}1L^>/2~~1+1\Z2) 85 3.2 Characterization of the NC//-Wavelets 86 3.2.1 Generator Expressions for [Z]lLif^2~1+l\z2)e~z2 86 3.2.2 Derivative Relations of [Z]1 L\^^2^1+l\z2)e~z 88 3.2.3 Lowering Relations of [Z]lL^^2 1+l\z2)e~z 92 3.3 The Ladder Operators of the NC/z-Wavelets 98 Appendix 3A: Associated Laguerre Polynomials 109 Appendix 3B: Proof of Recursion Relationship 3.39 112 Appendix 3C: Proof of Recursion Relationship 3.40 113 Appendix 3D: Ladder Operators of the D-Dimensional Isotropic Harmonic Oscillator 116 4 The Numerical Properties of the Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Func­ tional 122 4.1 Expressions for NCDAF Function and Derivative Approximations 124 4.2 NCDAF Approximation of Linear Operators 130 4.3 Variational Derivation of NCDAF Approximation 133 4.4 Discrete NCDAF Approximation 140 4.5 General Numerical Properties of NCDAF Approximation 143 4.5.1 Measurement of Error 144 4.5.2 NCDAF Approximation of Polynomials 144 4.5.3 General Characteristics of the NCDAF Residual of Functions 148 4.5.4 NCDAF Approximation of Derivatives 150 4.5.5 Uniform Convergence 152 4.5.6 Repeated Application of the NCDAF Approximation 154 vi 4.5.7 NCDAF Approximation of Discontinuities 155 4.6 Discretization Effects 157 4.6.1 Approximation of Functions Between Grid Points 157 4.6.2 Discrete NCDAF in the Momentum Domain 159 4.6.3 A Further Limitation of the Discrete NCDAF Approximation 160 Appendix 4A: NCDAF Approximation of the Arbitrary Order Laplacian and Gradient of Arbitrary Order Laplacian 163 Appendix 4B: Two Dimensional Test Polynomials 166 Appendix 4C: Table of Optimal DAF Parameters 168 Figures 169 5 Comparison of Non-Cartesian and Cartesian Product Distributed Approximating Functionals 203 5.1 Cartesian Product DAF 204 5.2 Interrelationship Between CP and NCDAFs 205 5.3 Equivalence of CPDAF and NCDAF Approximations 208 5.3.1 Momentum Plateau Viewpoint 209 5.3.2 Polynomial Term Diagram Viewpoint 210 5.4 Computational Efficiency 211 5.5 Approximation of Polynomials 214 5.6 Coordinate Axis Bias 217 5.7 Induced Artificial Rectangular Structure 219 Appendix 5A: Derivation of the Basic NCDAF and CPDAF Interrelationships 221 Appendix 5B: Two Dimensional Test Polynomials 224 Figures 226 vii 6 Constructing Missing Data with Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Func­ tionals 241 6.1 Basic Principles 242 6.2 Equations 244 6.2.1 Derivation 244 6.2.2 Practical Considerations 245 6.3 Example Calculations 248 6.3.1 One-Dimensional Example 248 6.3.2 Two Dimensional Example 249 6.3.3 Image Example 250 Appendix 6A: Edge Treatment and Extrapolation 252 6A.1 Basis Function Tail 253 6A.2 Periodic Tail 256 Figures 259 Table 266 7 The Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Functional Representation of the Quantum Mechanical Free Evolution Propagator 267 7.1 Free Evolution Propagator 269 7.2 NCDAF Free Evolution Propagator 275 7.3 Discretization and Numerical Concerns 280 7.4 Numerical Demonstrations 282 7.4.1 Gaussian Wavepacket with Zero Group Momentum 282 7.4.2 Gaussian Wavepacket with Nonzero Group Momentum 283 Appendix 7A: Real and Imaginary Parts of the Free Propagator 285 Appendix 7B: NCDAF Diffusion Propagator 287 viii Appendix 7C: NCDAF Representation of Metaplectic Operators 290 Figures 293 8 Conclusion 305 References 308 Acknowledgments 322 ix List of Acronyms AIK Approximating Identity Kernel CMUS Constrained Minimum Uncertainty State CPDAF Cartesian Product Distributed Approximating Functional DAF Distributed Approximating Functional FEP Free Evolution Propagator FFT Fast Fourier Transform HT UP Heisenberg Total Uncertainty Product HUP Heisenberg Uncertainty Product MTUS Minimum Total Uncertainty State MUS Minimum Uncertainty State NCDAF Non-Cartesian Distributed Approximating Functional NC/t-Wavelet Non-Cartesian Minimum Uncertainty Wavelet RUP Robertson Uncertainty Product TDSE Time Dependent Schrôdinger Equation X Mathematical Notation It will be assumed the reader is comfortable with the notation of undergraduate calculus [1], including elementary vector calculus [2] [3], and Hilbert space methods used in quantum mechanics [4]. Discussed here is the shorthand employed in this thesis for handling quantities in arbitrary number of dimensions and coordinate systems1. The symbol , will be used to indicate a vector quantity of D dimensions. A couple examples include using p*' to indicate the momentum and using T\ to indicate the location of the ith sampled point. Components of a vector will be indicated with the same letter without the arrow and with a subscript. For example the components of p will be written as Pi iPa, • • • pjj. An important example to note is, the components of r i will be written as • • • r^jj where the reader needs to keep in mind that it is not a second rank tensor. It will be often be convenient to abbreviate the components of a vector that appear in the argument of a function by the vector symbol. For example, r /(^) = /( i,r2,--- ,rD) . Two important vector operators that will be encountered often in this thesis are the gradient and the Laplacian • It is important to note that this is in a coordinate system independent manner. For example, the l Note, attention will be restricted to Euclidean spaces. Laplacian could be express in D dimensional rectangular coordinates as or in hyperspherical coordinates [5] as Vt = —— — rD~x— — r,- —V r rD~1 dr dr r2 \ drj dri ) ' i>3 where r is the magnitude of 7". Integrals over all components of a (real) vector will be symbolized by / dPr f{rx,r2,---rD) , JRD where ZD symbolizes all of the real D dimensional space. In rectangular coordinates for three dimensions this means p poo POO POO / d~t /(r1,r2r3) = / dx dy dz g(x,yz) , «/R3 J — oo J—oo J — oo and in spherical coordinates it is p P2TT PIT POO 1 2 / d rf(rl,r2ri)= sin<pd<p dff r dr h(r,6,<j>) , Je3 JO JO JO where g and A are the function / expressed in rectangular and spherical coordinates respectively.
Recommended publications
  • Think Python
    Think Python How to Think Like a Computer Scientist 2nd Edition, Version 2.2.18 Think Python How to Think Like a Computer Scientist 2nd Edition, Version 2.2.18 Allen Downey Green Tea Press Needham, Massachusetts Copyright © 2015 Allen Downey. Green Tea Press 9 Washburn Ave Needham MA 02492 Permission is granted to copy, distribute, and/or modify this document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License, which is available at http: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. The original form of this book is LATEX source code. Compiling this LATEX source has the effect of gen- erating a device-independent representation of a textbook, which can be converted to other formats and printed. http://www.thinkpython2.com The LATEX source for this book is available from Preface The strange history of this book In January 1999 I was preparing to teach an introductory programming class in Java. I had taught it three times and I was getting frustrated. The failure rate in the class was too high and, even for students who succeeded, the overall level of achievement was too low. One of the problems I saw was the books. They were too big, with too much unnecessary detail about Java, and not enough high-level guidance about how to program. And they all suffered from the trap door effect: they would start out easy, proceed gradually, and then somewhere around Chapter 5 the bottom would fall out. The students would get too much new material, too fast, and I would spend the rest of the semester picking up the pieces.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Domain of a Function • Range Calculations Table of Contents (Continued)
    ~ THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON w Mathematics and Computer Science calculus Article: Functions menu Directory • Table of Contents • Begin tutorial on Functions • Index Copyright c 1995{1998 D. P. Story Last Revision Date: 11/6/1998 Functions Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Concept of a Function 2.1. Constructing Functions • The Use of Algebraic Expressions • Piecewise Definitions • Descriptive or Conceptual Methods 2.2. Evaluation Issues • Numerical Evaluation • Symbolic Evalulation 2.3. What's in a Name • The \Standard" Way • Functions Named by the Depen- dent Variable • Descriptive Naming • Famous Functions 2.4. Models for Functions • A Function as a Mapping • Venn Diagram of a Function • A Function as a Black Box 2.5. Calculating the Domain and Range • The Natural Domain of a Function • Range Calculations Table of Contents (continued) 2.6. Recognizing Functions • Interpreting the Terminology • The Vertical Line Test 3. Graphing: First Principles 4. Methods of Combining Functions 4.1. The Algebra of Functions 4.2. The Composition of Functions 4.3. Shifting and Rescaling • Horizontal Shifting • Vertical Shifting • Rescaling 5. Classification of Functions • Polynomial Functions • Rational Functions • Algebraic Functions 1. Introduction In the world of Mathematics one of the most common creatures en- countered is the function. It is important to understand the idea of a function if you want to gain a thorough understanding of Calculus. Science concerns itself with the discovery of physical or scientific truth. In a portion of these investigations, researchers (or engineers) attempt to discern relationships between physical quantities of interest. There are many ways of interpreting the meaning of the word \relation- ships," but in Calculus we are most often concerned with functional relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • False Dilemma Wikipedia Contents
    False dilemma Wikipedia Contents 1 False dilemma 1 1.1 Examples ............................................... 1 1.1.1 Morton's fork ......................................... 1 1.1.2 False choice .......................................... 2 1.1.3 Black-and-white thinking ................................... 2 1.2 See also ................................................ 2 1.3 References ............................................... 3 1.4 External links ............................................. 3 2 Affirmative action 4 2.1 Origins ................................................. 4 2.2 Women ................................................ 4 2.3 Quotas ................................................. 5 2.4 National approaches .......................................... 5 2.4.1 Africa ............................................ 5 2.4.2 Asia .............................................. 7 2.4.3 Europe ............................................ 8 2.4.4 North America ........................................ 10 2.4.5 Oceania ............................................ 11 2.4.6 South America ........................................ 11 2.5 International organizations ...................................... 11 2.5.1 United Nations ........................................ 12 2.6 Support ................................................ 12 2.6.1 Polls .............................................. 12 2.7 Criticism ............................................... 12 2.7.1 Mismatching ......................................... 13 2.8 See also
    [Show full text]
  • Pivotal Decompositions of Functions
    PIVOTAL DECOMPOSITIONS OF FUNCTIONS JEAN-LUC MARICHAL AND BRUNO TEHEUX Abstract. We extend the well-known Shannon decomposition of Boolean functions to more general classes of functions. Such decompositions, which we call pivotal decompositions, express the fact that every unary section of a function only depends upon its values at two given elements. Pivotal decom- positions appear to hold for various function classes, such as the class of lattice polynomial functions or the class of multilinear polynomial functions. We also define function classes characterized by pivotal decompositions and function classes characterized by their unary members and investigate links between these two concepts. 1. Introduction A remarkable (though immediate) property of Boolean functions is the so-called Shannon decomposition, or Shannon expansion (see [20]), also called pivotal decom- position [2]. This property states that, for every Boolean function f : {0, 1}n → {0, 1} and every k ∈ [n]= {1,...,n}, the following decomposition formula holds: 1 0 n (1) f(x) = xk f(xk)+ xk f(xk) , x = (x1,...,xn) ∈{0, 1} , a where xk = 1 − xk and xk is the n-tuple whose i-th coordinate is a, if i = k, and xi, otherwise. Here the ‘+’ sign represents the classical addition for real numbers. Decomposition formula (1) means that we can precompute the function values for xk = 0 and xk = 1 and then select the appropriate value depending on the value of xk. By analogy with the cofactor expansion formula for determinants, here 1 0 f(xk) (resp. f(xk)) is called the cofactor of xk (resp. xk) for f and is derived by setting xk = 1 (resp.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional C
    Functional C Pieter Hartel Henk Muller January 3, 1999 i Functional C Pieter Hartel Henk Muller University of Southampton University of Bristol Revision: 6.7 ii To Marijke Pieter To my family and other sources of inspiration Henk Revision: 6.7 c 1995,1996 Pieter Hartel & Henk Muller, all rights reserved. Preface The Computer Science Departments of many universities teach a functional lan- guage as the first programming language. Using a functional language with its high level of abstraction helps to emphasize the principles of programming. Func- tional programming is only one of the paradigms with which a student should be acquainted. Imperative, Concurrent, Object-Oriented, and Logic programming are also important. Depending on the problem to be solved, one of the paradigms will be chosen as the most natural paradigm for that problem. This book is the course material to teach a second paradigm: imperative pro- gramming, using C as the programming language. The book has been written so that it builds on the knowledge that the students have acquired during their first course on functional programming, using SML. The prerequisite of this book is that the principles of programming are already understood; this book does not specifically aim to teach `problem solving' or `programming'. This book aims to: ¡ Familiarise the reader with imperative programming as another way of imple- menting programs. The aim is to preserve the programming style, that is, the programmer thinks functionally while implementing an imperative pro- gram. ¡ Provide understanding of the differences between functional and imperative pro- gramming. Functional programming is a high level activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Functional Programming with Haskell
    Notes on Functional Programming with Haskell H. Conrad Cunningham [email protected] Multiparadigm Software Architecture Group Department of Computer and Information Science University of Mississippi 201 Weir Hall University, Mississippi 38677 USA Fall Semester 2014 Copyright c 1994, 1995, 1997, 2003, 2007, 2010, 2014 by H. Conrad Cunningham Permission to copy and use this document for educational or research purposes of a non-commercial nature is hereby granted provided that this copyright notice is retained on all copies. All other rights are reserved by the author. H. Conrad Cunningham, D.Sc. Professor and Chair Department of Computer and Information Science University of Mississippi 201 Weir Hall University, Mississippi 38677 USA [email protected] PREFACE TO 1995 EDITION I wrote this set of lecture notes for use in the course Functional Programming (CSCI 555) that I teach in the Department of Computer and Information Science at the Uni- versity of Mississippi. The course is open to advanced undergraduates and beginning graduate students. The first version of these notes were written as a part of my preparation for the fall semester 1993 offering of the course. This version reflects some restructuring and revision done for the fall 1994 offering of the course|or after completion of the class. For these classes, I used the following resources: Textbook { Richard Bird and Philip Wadler. Introduction to Functional Program- ming, Prentice Hall International, 1988 [2]. These notes more or less cover the material from chapters 1 through 6 plus selected material from chapters 7 through 9. Software { Gofer interpreter version 2.30 (2.28 in 1993) written by Mark P.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Trigonometry and Complex Numbers
    4 Trigonometry and Complex Numbers Trigonometry developed from the study of triangles, particularly right triangles, and the relations between the lengths of their sides and the sizes of their angles. The trigono- metric functions that measure the relationships between the sides of similar triangles have far-reaching applications that extend far beyond their use in the study of triangles. Complex numbers were developed, in part, because they complete, in a useful and ele- gant fashion, the study of the solutions of polynomial equations. Complex numbers are useful not only in mathematics, but in the other sciences as well. Trigonometry Most of the trigonometric computations in this chapter use six basic trigonometric func- tions The two fundamental trigonometric functions, sine and cosine, can be de¿ned in terms of the unit circle—the set of points in the Euclidean plane of distance one from the origin. A point on this circle has coordinates +frv w> vlq w,,wherew is a measure (in radians) of the angle at the origin between the positive {-axis and the ray from the ori- gin through the point measured in the counterclockwise direction. The other four basic trigonometric functions can be de¿ned in terms of these two—namely, vlq { 4 wdq { @ vhf { @ frv { frv { frv { 4 frw { @ fvf { @ vlq { vlq { 3 ?w? For 5 , these functions can be found as a ratio of certain sides of a right triangle that has one angle of radian measure w. Trigonometric Functions The symbols used for the six basic trigonometric functions—vlq, frv, wdq, frw, vhf, fvf—are abbreviations for the words cosine, sine, tangent, cotangent, secant, and cose- cant, respectively.You can enter these trigonometric functions and many other functions either from the keyboard in mathematics mode or from the dialog box that drops down when you click or choose Insert + Math Name.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary from Math Analysis
    A Glossary for Pre-calculus These terms were identified during the Cal-PASS deconstruction of the California State Standards for Math Analysis, Linear Algebra, and Trigonometry By the Cal-PASS Central San Diego Math Professional Learning Council Bruce Arnold, Brenda Kracht, Judy Ross, Terrie Teegarden and Maurice Tompkins 1 Preface: In the deconstruction of the California state standards for trigonometry, linear algebra and mathematical analysis for the Cal-PASS Content Standards Deconstruction projects, it became apparent that terms were used for which no definition was given. The San Diego Central Cal-PASS Math Professional Learning Council felt that many of these terms might be unfamiliar to a precalculus instructor. Hence, a list of key terms and their appropriate definitions were developed, resulting in this document. These descriptions are intended to be explanatory rather than to provide precise mathematical rigor. Some terms, such as logarithms, are not included even though they are essential for calculus preparation because they do not appear in the precalculus standards. Many high schools combine some of the standards from trigonometry, linear algebra, and mathematical analysis to form a pre-calculus course. Pre-calculus courses in community colleges and four year institutions also combine the content of these standards. This integrated approach reflects the fact that these topics do not exist in isolation, but rather work in unity with each other. It is also important to note that the order of the standards, or even groups of standards, may not reflect the order in which they might appear in standard textbooks or course outlines. Suggested topic sequence for a pre-calculus course: Mathematical Analysis 4 and 6 Note that there are many topics loosely associated with 4 that are not mentioned, such as the Rational Root Theorem, Descartes’ Rule of signs, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Mathematical Terms
    DICTIONARY OF MATHEMATICAL TERMS DR. ASHOT DJRBASHIAN in cooperation with PROF. PETER STATHIS 2 i INTRODUCTION changes in how students work with the books and treat them. More and more students opt for electronic books and "carry" them in their laptops, tablets, and even cellphones. This is This dictionary is specifically designed for a trend that seemingly cannot be reversed. two-year college students. It contains all the This is why we have decided to make this an important mathematical terms the students electronic and not a print book and post it would encounter in any mathematics classes on Mathematics Division site for anybody to they take. From the most basic mathemat- download. ical terms of Arithmetic to Algebra, Calcu- lus, Linear Algebra and Differential Equa- Here is how we envision the use of this dictio- tions. In addition we also included most of nary. As a student studies at home or in the the terms from Statistics, Business Calculus, class he or she may encounter a term which Finite Mathematics and some other less com- exact meaning is forgotten. Then instead of monly taught classes. In a few occasions we trying to find explanation in another book went beyond the standard material to satisfy (which may or may not be saved) or going curiosity of some students. Examples are the to internet sources they just open this dictio- article "Cantor set" and articles on solutions nary for necessary clarification and explana- of cubic and quartic equations. tion. The organization of the material is strictly Why is this a better option in most of the alphabetical, not by the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Scattering of Waves in the Phase Space, Quantum Mechanics, and Irreversibility
    EJTP 12, No. 32 (2015) 43–60 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Scattering of Waves in the Phase Space, Quantum Mechanics, and Irreversibility E. M. Beniaminov∗† Russian State University for the Humanities, Miusskaya sq. 6, Moscow, GSP-3, 125993, Russia Received 29 November 2014, Accepted 19 December 2014, Published 10 January 2015 Abstract: We give an example of a mathematical model describing quantum mechanical processes interacting with medium. As a model, we consider the process of heat scattering of a wave function defined on the phase space. We consider the case when the heat diffusion takes place only with respect to momenta. We state and study the corresponding modified Kramers equation for this process. We consider the consequent approximations to this equation in powers of the quantity inverse to the medium resistance per unit of mass of the particle in the process. The approximations are constructed similarly to statistical physics, where from the usual Kramers equation for the evolution of probability density of the Brownian motion of a particle in the phase space, one deduces an approximate description of this process by the Fokker–Planck equation for the density of probability distribution in the configuration space. We prove that the zero (invertible) approximation to our model with respect to the large parameter of the medium resistance, yields the usual quantum mechanical description by the Schr¨odinger equation with the standard Hamilton operator. We deduce the next approximation to the model with respect to the negative power of the medium resistance coefficient. As a result we obtain the modified Schr¨odinger equation taking into account dissipation of the process in the initial model, and explaining the decoherence of the wave function.
    [Show full text]
  • CS1313 Standard Library Functions Lesson
    Standard Library Functions Outline 1. Standard Library Functions Outline 20. Programming: Return Type 2. Functions in Mathematics #1 21. More on Function Arguments 3. Functions in Mathematics #2 22. Function Argument Example Part 1 4. Functions in Mathematics #3 23. Function Argument Example Part 2 5. Function Argument 24. Function Argument Example Part 3 6. Absolute Value Function in C #1 25. Using the C Standard Math Library 7. Absolute Value Function in C #2 26. Function Call in Assignment 8. Absolute Value Function in C #3 27. Function Call in printf 9. A Quick Look at abs 28. Function Call as Argument 10. Function Call in Programming 29. Function Call in Initialization 11. Math Function vs Programming 30. Function Use Example Part 1 Function 31. Function Use Example Part 2 12. C Standard Library 32. Function Use Example Part 3 13. C Standard Library Function Examples 33. Function Use Example Part 4 14. Is the Standard Library Enough? 34. Evaluation of Functions in Expressions 15. Math: Domain & Range #1 35. Evaluation Example #1 16. Math: Domain & Range #2 36. Evaluation Example #2 17. Math: Domain & Range #3 37. Exercise: Calculating Roots 18. Programming: Argument Type 19. Argument Type Mismatch CS1313: Standard Library Functions Lesson CS1313 Fall 2020 1 Functions in Mathematics #1 “A rule that relates two variables, typically x and y, is called a function if to each value of x the rule assigns one and only one value of y.” http://www.themathpage.com/aPreCalc/functions.htm So, for example, if we have a function f(x) = x + 1 then
    [Show full text]
  • Programming in Scilab
    Programming in Scilab Micha¨elBaudin September 2011 Abstract In this document, we present programming in Scilab. In the first part, we present the management of the memory of Scilab. In the second part, we present various data types and analyze programming methods associated with these data structures. In the third part, we present features to design flexible and robust functions. In the last part, we present methods which allow to achieve good performances. We emphasize the use of vectorized functions, which allow to get the best performances, based on calls to highly optimized numerical libraries. Many examples are provided, which allow to see the effectiveness of the methods that we present. Contents 1 Introduction5 2 Variable and memory management5 2.1 The stack.................................6 2.2 More on memory management......................8 2.2.1 Memory limitations from Scilab.................8 2.2.2 Memory limitations of 32 and 64 bit systems.......... 10 2.2.3 The algorithm in stacksize ................... 11 2.3 The list of variables and the function who ................ 11 2.4 Portability variables and functions.................... 12 2.5 Destroying variables : clear ....................... 15 2.6 The type and typeof functions..................... 16 2.7 Notes and references........................... 17 2.8 Exercises.................................. 18 3 Special data types 18 3.1 Strings................................... 18 3.2 Polynomials................................ 22 3.3 Hypermatrices............................... 25 3.4 Type and dimension of an extracted hypermatrix........... 28 3.5 The list data type............................ 30 3.6 The tlist data type........................... 33 3.7 Emulating OO Programming with typed lists............. 36 1 3.7.1 Limitations of positional arguments............... 37 3.7.2 A "person" class in Scilab...................
    [Show full text]