DOCSLIB.ORG

Arabic NLG Language Functions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arabic NLG Language Functions Arabic NLG Language Functions Wael Abed Ehud Reiter Dept of Computing Science Dept of Computing Science University of Aberdeen University of Aberdeen Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK [email protected] [email protected] Abstract a web interface are provided and available online on GitHub. 1. The Arabic language has very limited sup- ports from NLG researchers. In this paper, 2 Related Works we explain the challenges of the core gram- mar, provide a lexical resource, and implement As there is no NLG system done for Arabic, we the first language functions for the Arabic lan- investigated similar approaches that targets the guage. We did a human evaluation to evaluate language challenges. Green and DeNero(2012) our functions in generating sentences from the presented a method to cover words agreements to NADA Corpus. generate correct words inflections in a translating 1 Introduction task using a class-based agreement model. While, Khoufi et al.(2016) dealt with un-vocalisation and The Arabic Language is a member of the Semitic agglutination in Arabic. They built a statistical language family, the fifth most spoken language model to extract grammatical rules from a treebank in the world. Around 330 million people speak corpus to use these rules for parsing. this language as their mother tongue language distributed in 25 countries. It is mainly classified Furthermore, another member of the Semitic into two types; Classical and Modern Standard group, which is the Hebrew language, also lacks Arabic (MSA) (Al-Radaideh, 2020), in addition to NLG resources. One attempt to Generate a regional variances (dialects). As far as we know, noun compounds in Hebrew goes back to 1998 there are not any pipeline NLG systems or libraries (Netzer and Elhadad, 1998), they used a rule-based that support an Arabic surface realiser at the time approach and listed the difficulties between of writing this paper. Two factors might be the English and Hebrew in terms of the syntactic, reasons: Arabic Language complexity and limited semantic and lexical constraints for generating a resources. An example that reflects the second Noun Compounds, including a special feature of cause is that even the Google n-gram viewer does Hebrew called "Smixut". not support the Arabic language (Alsmadi and Zarour, 2018). For other languages, researchers used different realisers’ technologies such as handcrafted gram- Therefore, in this paper, we are presenting six mars rule-based (Gatt and Reiter, 2009), statis- simple morphological MSA natural language func- tical approaches (Gardent and Perez-Beltrachini, tions (inflectNoun, buildNP, inflectVerb, inflectAd- 2017) and human-generated template-based (Gatt jective, pronouns and numToWords). These func- and Krahmer, 2018). However, SimpleNLG is still tions can be considered as a good start to build considered the most popular method since it was an Arabic surface realiser, which can be used in a presented by Gatt and Reiter(2009), It is a rule- pipeline NLG system as they can be used to cor- based realiser that uses three main steps syntac- rectly generate and inflect different parts of speech tic, morphological and orthographic realisations including the generation of a noun phrase. to produce a correctly inflected and high-quality We implemented these functions from scratch us- output. It was adapted to many languages includ- ing a rule-based approach. Furthermore, a lexicon 1https://github:com/WaelMohammedAbed/ containing around 9000 lemmata were collected. Natural-Language-Generation-for-the- An open-source versions of lexicon and code with Arabic-Language 7 Proceedings of The 13th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 7–14, Dublin, Ireland, 15-18 December, 2020. c 2020 Association for Computational Linguistics ing (in chronological order) French (Vaudry and Singular femi- ­CAyF nine noun (car) Lapalme, 2013), Italian (Mazzei et al., 2016), Span- Dual and nomi- A CAyF change the last letter (­) ish (Ramos-Soto et al., 2017), Galician (Cascallar- native to () then add the suf- Fuentes et al., 2018), Dutch (de Jong and Theune, fix ( ) - aan Plural and geni- CAyF remove the last letter (­) 2018), Mandarin (Chen et al., 2018) and German tive then add the suffix () (Braun et al., 2019). - aat Another popular approach is to provide gram- Singular mascu- d line noun (de- mars’ functions to be used in a template-based fender) NLG system. Such as RosaeNLG 2,which is an Dual and geni- y`d only add the suffix (§) open-source, template-based, NLG library that tive - ayn Plural and nomi- w`d only add the suffix ( ¤) gives simpler functions than SimpleNLG and had native - uun been used for English, French, German, Italian and Singular Broken Changes Spanish languages. Similar approaches with fewer plural options can be found in Core-NLG 3 and xSpin 4. A - door w Add prefix "ah" () and -doors infix (w) (¤) Our approach is more similar to RosaeNLG than Note: in the examples above there are other changes in the to SimpleNLG. As we will provide language func- small vowels marks that did not mention because it will not tions and a noun phrase function to give correct be covered here grammatical inflections and agreements. Due to Table 1: examples show the Arabic noun’s forms the huge morphological difference between the with different case and gender Semitic and non-Semitic languages, we could not adopt SimpleNLG nor RosaeNLG. Therefore, we found it convenient as a start to building our func- on the case and the gender of the noun. tions from scratch following the same approach of RosaeNLG. Regarding the plural form, there are two different types: sound plural and broken plural. The first one 3 Arabic language challenges can be inflected using similar steps to the steps used in dual form, with a different set of suffixes (" ¤"- The Arabic language consists of 28 alphabet letters, uun, "§"-iin, ""- aat). Some cases can only be written from right to left and there is no letters cap- identified by the "harakãt" (Ar) short vowel italisation. It has a very rich morphology measured . marks of the last consonant letter. The short vowel in the number of different forms for its nouns, verbs marks will be neglected here, as for MSA according and particles (Al-Radaideh, 2020). to many studies, adding these "Short Vowels Do 3.1 Nouns Not Contribute to the Quality of Reading" (Abu- Rabia, 2019). Arabic nouns can be inflected depending on the While the Broken plural has different inflections. sentence gender, number, and grammatical case This type has more than 30 patterns to use with (nominative, genitive, and accusative). internal and external manipulation of the sounds and vowels letters in the word and there are no Arabic assigns gender for living and non-living firm rules (Dawdy-Hesterberg and Pierrehumbert, things (ex: "car" (­CAyF) treated as feminine, while 2014). Table1 illustrates all these states for dual, "Goal" (d¡) is a masculine noun) (Shamsan and sound plural and broken plural. Attayib, 2015). Moreover, unlike many languages, Arabic has a dual form in addition to singular and 3.2 Numerals plural form. This form is used to express a noun The challenges of the Arabic numerals are their that refers to two entities (things or people), and relation with the noun’s gender, case, definiteness, can be generated by adding one of these suffixes word order and counts. In addition, they do not fol- (" "- aan, "§"-ayn, " A "-taan, "y "-tayn) to low the rules in some cases (Al-Bataineh and Brani- the singular form). The type of suffix used depends gan, 2020). These facts classify Arabic numerals 2https://rosaenlg:org/rosaenlg/1:16:4/ as a complex problem compared to its relevance about/compare:html in the English language. Arabic numerals (ordinal 3https://github:com/societe-generale/ core-nlg and cardinal) can be classified mainly into three 4https://xspin:it/plus groups (Al-Bataineh and Branigan, 2020)(Al Easa, 8 Arabic example Word by word to English transla- 3.3 Adjectives English tion d¤ d¡ Goal one(M) one goal In MSA, Adjectives commonly used after the ­d¤ ­CAyF Car one(F) one car ytn y CAyF cars(dual) two cars nouns, although they can be used before as well. two(F) They agree with the noun in gender, case, defi- ¤rK¤ d¤ One(M) and Twenty one niteness and number (Shamsan and Attayib, 2015) d¡ twenty(m- goals plural) goal(m- (Idrissi et al., 2019). If the adjective is used to de- singular) scribe an un-human plural noun, then the adjective will take the singular feminine form (Shamsan and Table 2: examples show the numerals inflection Attayib, 2015). However, with time this exception started to disappear and full agreement in the noun- adjective sentence is used (Idrissi et al., 2019). 1997). Ex: ºAmk Ar- the-men (M-plural- definite-nominative) the-wise (M-plural-definite- Simplex numerals (1-10): according to nominative)- The wise men (Al Easa, 1997) this group has two subgroups: singular numerals (1 and 2) and added numerals 3.4 Verbs (3-10). Singular numerals agree with the counted Arabic verbs participate in a large percentage of noun in all aspects. However, this is the only group the sentence due to their morphological richness. in the Arabic numerals that comes after the noun There are 19 forms for verb inflections, and for each in the word order. For the second subgroup, the form, the verb agrees with the subject in terms of numeral gender will take the opposite form of the number, person and gender. Moreover, it can be noun gender (see table2). inflected using four moods, two voices and three tenses (Shaalan et al., 2015). Compound numerals (11-19): It has two major differences. The first one is that each numeral con- 3.5 Pronouns sists of two words, one for each digit (units and Arabic pronouns can be categorised to Explicit and ten).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Representation of Inflected Nouns in the Internal Lexicon
    Memory & Cognition 1980, Vol. 8 (5), 415423 Represeritation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon G. LUKATELA, B. GLIGORIJEVIC, and A. KOSTIC University ofBelgrade, Belgrade, Yugoslavia and M.T.TURVEY University ofConnecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268 and Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06510 The lexical representation of Serbo-Croatian nouns was investigated in a lexical decision task. Because Serbo-Croatian nouns are declined, a noun may appear in one of several gram­ matical cases distinguished by the inflectional morpheme affixed to the base form. The gram­ matical cases occur with different frequencies, although some are visually and phonetically identical. When the frequencies of identical forms are compounded, the ordering of frequencies is not the same for masculine and feminine genders. These two genders are distinguished further by the fact that the base form for masculine nouns is an actual grammatical case, the nominative singular, whereas the base form for feminine nouns is an abstraction in that it cannot stand alone as an independent word. Exploiting these characteristics of the Serbo­ Croatian language, we contrasted three views of how a noun is represented: (1) the independent­ entries hypothesis, which assumes an independent representation for each grammatical case, reflecting its frequency of occurrence; (2) the derivational hypothesis, which assumes that only the base morpheme is stored, with the individual cases derived from separately stored inflec­ tional morphemes and rules for combination; and (3) the satellite-entries hypothesis, which assumes that all cases are individually represented, with the nominative singular functioning as the nucleus and the embodiment of the noun's frequency and around which the other cases cluster uniformly.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Comprehension of Negation in 2- to 4-Year-Old Children Ann E
    Measuring the comprehension of negation in 2- to 4-year-old children Ann E. Nordmeyer Michael C. Frank [email protected] [email protected] Department of Psychology Department of Psychology Stanford University Stanford University Abstract and inferential negation (i.e. negation of inferred beliefs of others). Regardless of taxonomy, negation is used in a variety Negation is one of the most important concepts in human lan- guage, and yet little is known about children’s ability to com- of contexts to express a range of different thoughts. prehend negative sentences. In this experiment, we explore The relationship between different types of negation is un- how children’s comprehension of negative sentences changes between 2- to 4-year-old children, as well as how comprehen- known. One possibility is that distinct categories of negation sion is influenced by how negative sentences are used. Chil- belong to a single cohesive concept. Even pre-linguistically, dren between the ages of 2 and 4 years watched a video in nonexistence, rejection, and denial could all fall under a su- which they heard positive and negative sentences. Negative sentences, such as “look at the boy with no apples”, referred perordinate conceptual category of negation. It is also pos- either to an absence of a characteristic or an alternative char- sible, however, that these types of negation represent fun- acteristic. Older children showed significant improvements in damentally different concepts. For example, the situation in speed and accuracy of looks to target. Children showed more rejection difficulty when the negative sentence referred to nothing, com- which a child expresses a dislike for going outside ( ) pared to when it referred to an alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotating Tense, Mood and Voice for English, French and German
    Annotating tense, mood and voice for English, French and German Anita Ramm1;4 Sharid Loaiciga´ 2;3 Annemarie Friedrich4 Alexander Fraser4 1Institut fur¨ Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universitat¨ Stuttgart 2Departement´ de Linguistique, Universite´ de Geneve` 3Department of Linguistics and Philology, Uppsala University 4Centrum fur¨ Informations- und Sprachverarbeitung, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munchen¨ [email protected] [email protected] fanne,[email protected] Abstract features. They may, for instance, be used to clas- sify texts with respect to the epoch or region in We present the first open-source tool for which they have been produced, or for assigning annotating morphosyntactic tense, mood texts to a specific author. Moreover, in cross- and voice for English, French and Ger- lingual research, tense, mood, and voice have been man verbal complexes. The annotation is used to model the translation of tense between based on a set of language-specific rules, different language pairs (Santos, 2004; Loaiciga´ which are applied on dependency trees et al., 2014; Ramm and Fraser, 2016)). Identi- and leverage information about lemmas, fying the morphosyntactic tense is also a neces- morphological properties and POS-tags of sary prerequisite for identifying the semantic tense the verbs. Our tool has an average accu- in synthetic languages such as English, French racy of about 76%. The tense, mood and or German (Reichart and Rappoport, 2010). The voice features are useful both as features extracted tense-mood-voice (TMV) features may in computational modeling and for corpus- also be useful for training models in computational linguistic research. linguistics, e.g., for modeling of temporal relations (Costa and Branco, 2012; UzZaman et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Polyfunctionality and Morphology-Syntax Interdependencies
    Systemic polyfunctionality and morphology-syntax interdependencies Farrell Ackerman1 Olivier Bonami2 Irina Nikolaeva3 1University of California, San Diego 2Université Paris-Sorbonne 3SOAS Defaults in Morphological Theory Lexington, May 2012 The basic problem: Systemic Polyfunctionality Cross-linguistically person/number markers (PNMs) in verbal paradigms often exhibit similarities (up to identity) with person/number markers in nominal possessive constructions (Allen 1964, Radics 1980, Siewierska 1998, 2004, among others): When a language has distinct PNM paradigms for verbal subject (S/A) and object (O) indexing, a question arises: Which paradigm does the possessive paradigm align with? (1) Retuarã (Tucanoan) S/A alignment b˜ıre yi-ha¯a-a¯ Psi yi-behoa-pi 2SG 1SG-kill-NEG.IMP 1SG-spear-INSTR ‘(Be careful), lest I kill you with my spear’ (Strom 1992:63) (2) Kilivila (Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian) O alignment lube-gu ku-sake-gu buva friend-1SG 2SG-give-1SG betel_nut ‘My friend, do you give me betel nuts?’ (Senft 1986:53) The basic problem: Systemic Polyfunctionality Among the 130 relevant languages in Sierwieska’s (1998) sample she observes that, We see that [...], among the languages in the sample the affinities in form between the possessor affixes and the verbal person markers of the O (41%) are just marginally more common than those with the S/A (39%). (Siewierska 1998:2) There are, by hypothesis, systemic properties of specific grammars, rather than language independent universals, that explain the alignments observed. The languages compared by Siewierska appear to have distinct markers for S/A and O, and the question asked is which paradigm appears in possessive marking.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: a Case Study from Koro
    Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro By Jessica Cleary-Kemp A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair Assistant Professor Peter S. Jenks Professor William F. Hanks Summer 2015 © Copyright by Jessica Cleary-Kemp All Rights Reserved Abstract Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro by Jessica Cleary-Kemp Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair In this dissertation a methodology for identifying and analyzing serial verb constructions (SVCs) is developed, and its application is exemplified through an analysis of SVCs in Koro, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. SVCs involve two main verbs that form a single predicate and share at least one of their arguments. In addition, they have shared values for tense, aspect, and mood, and they denote a single event. The unique syntactic and semantic properties of SVCs present a number of theoretical challenges, and thus they have invited great interest from syntacticians and typologists alike. But characterizing the nature of SVCs and making generalizations about the typology of serializing languages has proven difficult. There is still debate about both the surface properties of SVCs and their underlying syntactic structure. The current work addresses some of these issues by approaching serialization from two angles: the typological and the language-specific. On the typological front, it refines the definition of ‘SVC’ and develops a principled set of cross-linguistically applicable diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 5/3/2015, SPi Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity Edited by MATTHEW BAERMAN, DUNSTAN BROWN, AND GREVILLE G. CORBETT 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 5/3/2015, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox2 6dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © editorial matter and organization Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown, and Greville G. Corbett 2015 © the chapters their several authors 2015 Themoralrightsoftheauthorshavebeenasserted First Edition published in 2015 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2014947260 ISBN 978–0–19–872376–9 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, cr0 4yy Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions Robert C
    Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 40 Article 3 Issue 1 Fall 2008 2008 Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions Robert C. Farrell Quinnipiac University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert C. Farrell, Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions, 40 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 1 (2008). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol40/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions Robert C. Farrell* I. INTRODUCTION Does it matter that the editors of thirty-three law journals, including those at Yale and Michigan, think that there is a "passive tense"? l Does it matter that the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth2 and Eleventh3 Circuits think that there is a "passive mood"? Does it matter that the editors of fourteen law reviews think that there is a "subjunctive tense"?4 Does it matter that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit thinks that there is a "subjunctive voice'"? 5 There is, in fact, no "passive tense" or "passive mood." The passive is a voice. 6 There is no "subjunctive voice" or "subjunctive tense." The subjunctive is a mood.7 The examples in the first paragraph suggest that there is widespread unfamiliarity among lawyers and law students * B.A., Trinity College; J.D., Harvard University; Professor, Quinnipiac University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Verbs and Essential Grammar Review
    Spanish Verbs and Essential Grammar Review Prepared by: Professor Carmen L. Torres-Robles Department of Foreign Languages & Literatures Purdue University Calumet Revised: 1 /2003 Layout by: Nancy J. Tilka CONTENTS Spanish Verbs Introduction 4 Indicative Mood 5 ® simple & compound tenses: present, past, future, conditional Subjunctive Mood 12 ® simple & compound tenses: present, past Ser / Estar 16 Essential Grammar Pronouns 20 Possesive Adjectives and Pronouns 23 Prepositional Pronouns 25 Por versus Para 27 Comparisons / Superlatives 31 Preterite / Imperfect 34 Subjunctive Mood 37 Commands 42 Passive Voice 46 2 Spanish Verbs 3 INTRODUCTION VERBS (VERBOS) MOODS (MODOS) There are three moods or ways to express verbs (actions) in Spanish. 1. Indicative Mood (objective) 2. Subjunctive Mood (subjective) 3. Imperative Mood (commands) INFINITIVES (INFINITIVOS) A verb in the purest form (without a noun or subject pronoun to perform the action) is called an infinitive. The infinitives in English are characterized by the prefix “to” + “verb form”, the Spanish infinitives are identified by the “r” ending. Example estudiar, comer, dormir to study, to eat, to sleep CONJUGATIONS (CONJUGACIONES) Spanish verbs are grouped in three categories or conjugations. 1. Infinitives ending in –ar belong to the first conjugation. (estudiar) 2. Infinitives ending in –er belong to the second conjugation. (comer) 3. Infinitives ending in –ir belong to the third conjugation. (dormir) VERB STRUCTURE (ESTRUCTURA VERBAL) Spanish verbs are divided into three parts. (infinitive: estudiar) 1. Stem or Root (estudi-) 2. Theme Vowel (-a-) 3. "R" Ending (-r) CONJUGATED VERBS (VERBOS CONJUGADOS) To conjugate a verb, a verb must have an explicit subject noun (ex: María), a subject pronoun (yo, tú, usted, él, ella, nosotros(as), vosotros(as), ustedes, ellos, ellas), or an implicit subject, to indicate the performer of the action.
    [Show full text]
  • 30. Tense Aspect Mood 615
    30. Tense Aspect Mood 615 Richards, Ivor Armstrong 1936 The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rockwell, Patricia 2007 Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psycho- linguistic Research 36: 361−369. Rosenblum, Doron 5. March 2004 Smart he is not. http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/smart-he-is-not- 1.115908. Searle, John 1979 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Seddiq, Mirriam N. A. Why I don’t want to talk to you. http://notguiltynoway.com/2004/09/why-i-dont-want- to-talk-to-you.html. Singh, Onkar 17. December 2002 Parliament attack convicts fight in court. http://www.rediff.com/news/ 2002/dec/17parl2.htm [Accessed 24 July 2013]. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson 1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Voegele, Jason N. A. http://www.jvoegele.com/literarysf/cyberpunk.html Voyer, Daniel and Cheryl Techentin 2010 Subjective acoustic features of sarcasm: Lower, slower, and more. Metaphor and Symbol 25: 1−16. Ward, Gregory 1983 A pragmatic analysis of epitomization. Papers in Linguistics 17: 145−161. Ward, Gregory and Betty J. Birner 2006 Information structure. In: B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds.), Handbook of English Lin- guistics, 291−317. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Rachel Giora, Tel Aviv, (Israel) 30. Tense Aspect Mood 1. Introduction 2. Metaphor: EVENTS ARE (PHYSICAL) OBJECTS 3. Polysemy, construal, profiling, and coercion 4. Interactions of tense, aspect, and mood 5. Conclusion 6. References 1. Introduction In the framework of cognitive linguistics we approach the grammatical categories of tense, aspect, and mood from the perspective of general cognitive strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • SPLIT-ERGATIVITY in HITTITE Petra Goedegebuure (University of Chicago)
    Published in: Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie. Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 270–303, ISSN (Online) 1613-1150, ISSN (Print) 0084-5299, DOI: 10.1515/za- 2012-0015, January 2013 1 SPLIT-ERGATIVITY IN HITTITE Petra Goedegebuure (University of Chicago) “it is possible that all languages show ergativity on some level” (McGregor 2009, 482) 1. Introduction2 As a highly heterogeneous phenomenon ergativity remains a conundrum for linguistic theory. The ergative case has been treated as a structural case, an inherent/lexical case, or rather as a mix (Butt 2006). Split-ergativity is thought to arise as an epiphenomenon, as ‘collateral damage’ of diachronic change after reinterpretation of passive constructions with instrumentals (Dixon 1994) or through reanalysis of transitive null-subject clauses with inanimate instrumentals (Garrett 1990b). Alternatively, case assignment and therefore also split-ergativity ultimately depends on synchronic structural properties of the clause (Merchant 2006). It has been claimed that only 25% of the world’s languages shows ergativity (Van de Visser 2006), or that “all languages show ergativity on some level” (McGregor 2009, 482). Irrespective of the correct ratio, split-ergativity seems to be the norm among languages that show ergativity. When the ergative split is based on semantic features of noun phrases, it is generally assumed that animacy plays a major role. Silverstein (1976) has shown that pronouns and nouns can be hierarchically arranged based on semantic features such as person, number, or grammatical gender. The strength of this hierarchy is that if agent marking is attested for the first time at a certain point in the hierarchy, all nominals lower in the hierarchy will carry agent marking as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenses and Conjugation (Pdf)
    Created by the Evergreen Writing Center Library 3407 867-6420 Tenses and Conjugation Using correct verb forms is crucial to communicating coherently. Understanding how to apply different tenses and properly conjugate verbs will give you the tools with which to craft clear, effective sentences. Conjugations A conjugation is a list of verb forms. It catalogues the person, number, tense, voice, and mood of a verb. Knowing how to conjugate verbs correctly will help you match verbs with their subjects, and give you a firmer grasp on how verbs function in different sentences. Here is a sample conjugation table: Present Tense, Active Voice, Indicative Mood: Jump Person Singular Plural 1st Person I jump we jump 2nd Person you jump you jump 3rd Person he/she/it jumps they jump Person: Person is divided into three categories (first, second, and third person), and tells the reader whether the subject is speaking, is spoken to, or is spoken about. Each person is expressed using different subjects: first person uses I or we; second person uses you; and third person uses he/she/it or they. Keep in mind that these words are not the only indicators of person; for example in the sentence “Shakespeare uses images of the divine in his sonnets to represent his own delusions of grandeur”, the verb uses is in the third person because Shakespeare could be replaced by he, an indicator of the third person. Number: Number refers to whether the verb is singular or plural. Tense: Tense tells the reader when the action of a verb takes place.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Study of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Diglossic Speech in Cairene Arabic
    CORPUS STUDY OF TENSE, ASPECT, AND MODALITY IN DIGLOSSIC SPEECH IN CAIRENE ARABIC BY OLA AHMED MOSHREF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Elabbas Benmamoun, Chair Professor Eyamba Bokamba Professor Rakesh M. Bhatt Assistant Professor Marina Terkourafi ABSTRACT Morpho-syntactic features of Modern Standard Arabic mix intricately with those of Egyptian Colloquial Arabic in ordinary speech. I study the lexical, phonological and syntactic features of verb phrase morphemes and constituents in different tenses, aspects, moods. A corpus of over 3000 phrases was collected from religious, political/economic and sports interviews on four Egyptian satellite TV channels. The computational analysis of the data shows that systematic and content morphemes from both varieties of Arabic combine in principled ways. Syntactic considerations play a critical role with regard to the frequency and direction of code-switching between the negative marker, subject, or complement on one hand and the verb on the other. Morph-syntactic constraints regulate different types of discourse but more formal topics may exhibit more mixing between Colloquial aspect or future markers and Standard verbs. ii To the One Arab Dream that will come true inshaa’ Allah! عربية أنا.. أميت دمها خري الدماء.. كما يقول أيب الشاعر العراقي: بدر شاكر السياب Arab I am.. My nation’s blood is the finest.. As my father says Iraqi Poet: Badr Shaker Elsayyab iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I’m sincerely thankful to my advisor Prof. Elabbas Benmamoun, who during the six years of my study at UIUC was always kind, caring and supportive on the personal and academic levels.
    [Show full text]