Modality-Based Organization of Ascending Somatosensory Axons in the Direct Dorsal Column Pathway
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 6, 2013 • 33(45):17691–17709 • 17691 Cellular/Molecular Modality-Based Organization of Ascending Somatosensory Axons in the Direct Dorsal Column Pathway Jingwen Niu,1 Long Ding,1 Jian J. Li,2 Hyukmin Kim,3 Jiakun Liu,1 Haipeng Li,1,4 Andrew Moberly,1 Tudor C. Badea,5 Ian D. Duncan,6 Young-Jin Son,3 Steven S. Scherer,2 and Wenqin Luo1 1Department of Neuroscience and 2Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, 3Shriners Hospital Pediatric Research Center and Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, 4Department of Neurology, the First People’s Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China, 5Retinal Circuit Development & Genetics Unit, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and 6Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 The long-standing doctrine regarding the functional organization of the direct dorsal column (DDC) pathway is the “somatotopic map” model, which suggests that somatosensory afferents are primarily organized by receptive field instead of modality. Using modality- specific genetic tracing, here we show that ascending mechanosensory and proprioceptive axons, two main types of the DDC afferents, are largely segregated into a medial–lateral pattern in the mouse dorsal column and medulla. In addition, we found that this modality-based organization is likely to be conserved in other mammalian species, including human. Furthermore, we identified key morphological differences between these two types of afferents, which explains how modality segregation is formed and why a rough “somatotopic map” was previously detected. Collectively, our results establish a new functional organization model for the mammalian direct dorsal column pathway and provide insight into how somatotopic and modality-based organization coexist in the central somatosensory pathway. Introduction (Nord, 1967; Johnson et al., 1968; Whitsel et al., 1969, 1970; The spinal cord dorsal column contains ascending axons of pri- Culberson and Brushart, 1989), dye tracing (Maslany et al., 1991; mary somatosensory neurons [direct dorsal column (DDC) Giuffrida and Rustioni, 1992), and lesion studies (Smith and pathway] and secondary neurons of spinal cord, and descending Deacon, 1984). axons from the dorsal column nuclei (DCN). In rodents, the On the other hand, multiple types of somatosensory afferents, dorsal corticospinal tract also descends in the dorsal column. two major types of which are proprioceptors and A low- Given that the dorsal column is one of the major axonal bundles threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs), project through the DDC bridging the periphery and brain, it is important to thoroughly pathway. Because these different types of somatosensory affer- understand its normal functional organization. ents join the dorsal column from each spinal cord segment, the The DDC is divided into a medial gracile fasciculus and a “somatotopic map” model predicts that they would intermingle lateral cuneate fasciculus, which contains afferents of DRG neu- together (see Fig. 1B). However, physiological recordings sug- rons below and above T6, respectively, and innervate the ipsilat- gested that somatosensory fibers carrying the same modality of eral DCNs of medulla (see Fig. 1A). A prevailing view on the information project together in the dorsal column (Uddenberg, functional organization of the DDC pathway is the “somatotopic 1968) and innervate distinct domains of DCNs (Dykes et al., map” model, which suggests that ascending somatosensory fibers 1982; Hummelsheim et al., 1985; Fyffe et al., 1986). These seem- entering at successive rostral levels are located lateral to those ingly contradictory observations raise the question of how the from lower segments (Watson and Kayalionglu, 2009). This “so- somatotopic and modality-based organization coexists in the matotopic map” model is supported by physiological recordings DDC pathway. Previously, we found that fibers of genetically traced rapidly  Received Aug. 9, 2013; revised Sept. 12, 2013; accepted Sept. 29, 2013. adapting (RA) mechanoreceptors, a major type of A LTMR, are Author contributions: J.N., Y.-J.S., S.S.S., and W.L. designed research; J.N., J.J.L., H.K., and I.D.D. performed highly enriched in the cervical gracile fasciculus and innervate research; T.C.B. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; J.N., L.D., J.L., H.L., A.M., and W.L. analyzed data; subdomains of DCNs (Luo et al., 2009). However, it is unclear J.N., L.D., Y.-J.S., S.S.S., and W.L. wrote the paper. whether this observation truly reflects a modality-based organi- W.L. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R00NS069799 and 1R01NS083702, Thomas B. Mc- CabeandJeanetteE.LawsMcCabePilotAward,BasilO’ConnorStarterScholarResearchAward,andtheUniversityof zation in the DDC pathway or it is simply the result of somato- Pennsylvania. Y.-J.S. was supported by the National Institutes of Health and Shriners Hospitals for the Children. sensory fiber re-sorting as they ascend toward the medulla The authors declare no competing financial interests. (Whitsel et al., 1970; Willis, 1991). Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Wenqin Luo, Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Using a combination of genetic and anatomical approaches, Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 145 Johnson Pavilion, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: [email protected]. here we show that mouse mechanosensory and proprioceptive DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3429-13.2013 afferents are largely segregated into a medial–lateral pattern Copyright © 2013 the authors 0270-6474/13/3317691-19$15.00/0 throughout the entire dorsal column. In addition, we found that 17692 • J. Neurosci., November 6, 2013 • 33(45):17691–17709 Niu et al. • Functional Organization of the Mammalian Dorsal Column this modality-based organization is likely to be conserved in cords were dissected, cut into 2 mm transverse slices and postfixed in the other mammalian species, including human. Finally, using same fixative overnight at 4°C. Tissues were postfixed in 1% OsO4 for2h modality-specific sparse genetic tracing, we identified key mor- and rinsed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer. After gradient ethanol dehydra- phological distinctions between mechanosensory and proprio- tion and rinse in propylene oxide, tissues were embedded in Epon for ceptive afferents, which lead to the “modality segregation” and cutting 1 m semithin sections. Sections were stained either in toluidine blue or paraphenylenediamene. Semithin sections of adult rat, feline, and explains why a rough “somatotopic map” was previously de- canine cervical spinal cords were processed and sectioned by Dr. Ian D. tected. Collectively, our results suggest that ascending somato- Duncan at University of Wisconsin as previously described (Jackson et sensory afferents in the mammalian DDC pathway are primarily al., 2009). organized by modality and that a somatotoptic map exists within Central root rhizotomy. The survival surgery of central root rhizotomy the same modality. Our work provides a new anatomical refer- was conducted in Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple ence for studying dorsal column development, injury, and University. All surgical and postoperative procedures were performed in regeneration. accordance with Temple’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and National Institutes of Health guidelines. Dorsal root transection of Materials and Methods L4–L5 was performed with 3 adult C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Labora- Mouse strains and genetic labeling of RA mechanoreceptors and propriocep- tory). Procedures are the same as previously described (Fleming et al., tors. Mice were raised in a barrier facility in the Hill Pavilion, University 2012). Two weeks after lesion surgery, animals were killed and semithin of Pennsylvania. All procedures were conducted according to animal sections of the spinal cord were performed. protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Heatmap generation. To visualize the distribution of dorsal column axons of the University of Pennsylvania and the National Institutes of Health of different sizes, we performed the following procedures using a custom guidelines. Mice used in this paper were described previously: RetCreERT, program written in MATLAB (MathWorks) (see Fig. 8A–E). (1) A raw im- PvCreERT2, PvCre(Arbr), Pv Cre(Aibs ), Rosa26Tdt, Rosa26iAP, and TaumGFP age is converted to a binary image using a threshold that appropriately sep- mice (Hippenmeyer et al., 2005; Badea et al., 2009; Luo et al., 2009; arates the cross-sections of axons and fiber walls. (2) Thresholds for the Madisen et al., 2010; Taniguchi et al., 2011). We set timed pregnancy maximum cross-section area and maximum length of the major axis are mating for RetCreERT2 and Rosa26Tdt, TaumGFP,orRosa26iAP reporter operationally determined for each image to exclude most non–axon- mice and treated pregnant female mice with 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (1.5, spurious areas, such as the extracellular space enclosed by the outer walls of 2, and 1 mg at E10.5, E11.5, and E12.5) by oral gavage to specifically label multiple axons. (3) Axon size (in pixels) was automatically measured. (4) the RA mechanoreceptor population. RetCreERT2; Rosa26iAP mice were The cumulative percentile of all dorsal column axons in different species