Pork Overview & Product Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Meat, Fish and Dairy Products and the Risk of Cancer: a Summary Matrix 7 2
Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer 2018 Contents World Cancer Research Fund Network 3 Executive summary 5 1. Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer: a summary matrix 7 2. Summary of Panel judgements 9 3. Definitions and patterns 11 3.1 Red meat 11 3.2 Processed meat 12 3.3 Foods containing haem iron 13 3.4 Fish 13 3.5 Cantonese-style salted fish 13 3.6 Grilled (broiled) or barbecued (charbroiled) meat and fish 14 3.7 Dairy products 14 3.8 Diets high in calcium 15 4. Interpretation of the evidence 16 4.1 General 16 4.2 Specific 16 5. Evidence and judgements 27 5.1 Red meat 27 5.2 Processed meat 31 5.3 Foods containing haem iron 35 5.4 Fish 36 5.5 Cantonese-style salted fish 37 5.6 Grilled (broiled) or barbecued (charbroiled) meat and fish 40 5.7 Dairy products 41 5.8 Diets high in calcium 51 5.9 Other 52 6. Comparison with the 2007 Second Expert Report 52 Acknowledgements 53 Abbreviations 57 Glossary 58 References 65 Appendix 1: Criteria for grading evidence for cancer prevention 71 Appendix 2: Mechanisms 74 Our Cancer Prevention Recommendations 79 2 Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer 2018 WORLD CANCER RESEARCH FUND NETWORK Our Vision We want to live in a world where no one develops a preventable cancer. Our Mission We champion the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed choices to reduce their cancer risk. -
Pork Q&A Answer
Supplemental Activity: TEACHER GUIDE Pork Q&A Answer Key Pork Q & A - ANSWER KEY Cooking Methods 1. How does the tenderness of the meat determine the method of cooking (direct or indirect heat)? As a general rule, the cuts from the loin and tenderloin tend to be the most tender – cook with direct heat. When working with larger, less-tender cuts, simply remember to cook slowly over indirect heat. 2. What is sautéing? What cuts of meat are ideal for sautéing? • Sauteing is to add a little cooking oil to pan; sauté over medium-high heat and turn once halfway through cooking time. • Meat cuts to sauté include cutlets, loin chops (bone-in or boneless), tenderloin medallions, and ground pork patties. 3. What is grilling? What cuts of meat are ideal for grilling? • Grilling is a high-heat, direct method of cooking meat over live flames. • Meat cuts to grill include loin chops (3/4 inch thickness), thick loin chops (1½ inch thick and boneless), loin kabobs, tenderloin, and ground pork patties. 4. What does it mean to marinate? What are two cuts of pork to marinate? • To marinate means to let food stand in marinade for a certain length of time to tenderize it and develop its flavor. A marinade may be a flavorful liquid such as barbecue sauce or a dry rub. • Two cuts of pork to marinate could be pork shoulder and roasts. 5. What is another name for indirect grilling? Barbecuing 6. What is barbecuing? What cuts of pork are best for barbecuing? Barbecuing is characterized by a long, low-heat, smoke-cooking method using coals, smoldering logs or chunks of wood. -
100195– Tuna, Chunk Light, Canned (K) Category
100195– Tuna, Chunk Light, Canned (K) Category: Meat/Meat Alternate PRODUCT DESCRIPTION NUTRITION FACTS This item is canned tuna packed in water with Serving size: 1 ounce (28 g)/1 MMA tuna, vegetable broth. The product contains a drained commercial Kosher certification. It is delivered in cases containing six 66.5-ounce cans. Amount Per Serving Calories 30 CREDITING/YIELD Total Fat 0g One case of tuna contains about 307 servings Saturated Fat 0g of drained tuna. Trans Fat 0g CN Crediting: 1 ounce of drained tuna credits Cholesterol 15mg as 1 ounce equivalent meat/meat alternate. Sodium 130mg Total Carbohydrate 0g CULINARY TIPS AND RECIPES Dietary Fiber 0g Canned tuna can be used in salads, sandwiches, or casseroles. Sugars 0g Mix tuna with chopped vegetables, mustard, Protein 6g and a little mayo for a tasty tuna topping to put on salad, whole grain sandwiches or crackers. Source: USDA Foods Vendor Labels For more culinary techniques and recipe ideas, visit the Institute of Child Nutrition or USDA’s Allergen Information: Product contains fish and soy. Please Team Nutrition. refer to allergen statement on the outside of the product package to confirm any vendor-specific information. For more information, please contact the product manufacturer directly. FOOD SAFETY INFORMATION For more information on safe storage and Nutrient values in this section are from the USDA National cooking temperatures, and safe handling Nutrient Database for Standard Reference or are representative practices please refer to: Developing a School values from USDA Foods vendor labels. Please refer to the product’s Nutrition Facts label or ingredient list for product- Food Safety Program Based on the Process specific information. -
Eating Less Meat
Eating Less Meat South Durham Green Neighbors This is the fourth in a series on taking larger steps toward sustainability. You know yourself best. What would it take to get yourself to eat less meat? Are Plant-based Diets Really That Great? Yes! PlantPure Nation, a documentary on plant-based diets, makes claims about the environmental and health benefits of those diets. A check on two databases of articles, Proquest Central and Pub Med, backs up these claims. (See references below.) Note: Plant-based diets vary from complete veganism to a diet of primarily plants with small quantities of fish +/- chicken and no red meat. Environmentally, British researchers have found that the plant-based diets results in lower greenhouse gas emissions. The age-and-sex-adjusted mean GHG emissions in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents per day (kgCO2e/day) were: 7.19 for high meat-eaters, 3.91 for fish-eaters, 5.63 for medium meat-eaters, 3.81 for vegetarians and 4.67 for low meat-eaters, 2.89 for vegans. In other words, eating lots of meat = bad, eating less or no meat = good. Medical research articles can be confusing, but by checking medical review articles you can avoid trying to make sense of lots of individual research studies. In these reviews, researchers look at all the studies they can find on a topic, check the quality of the research, and crunch the numbers to find out what the evidence really says. Below are some sources, but here’s the bottom line: Plant-based diets significantly reduce the risk of: Diabetes Obesity Hypertension Total cholesterol LDL Cholesterol Colorectal cancer Stroke When it comes to plant-based diets, what’s not to like? Creating Your Plan If you still want to eat meat, there’s an easy way to make sure you are at least not overindulging in it: Think of your plate as a circle divided roughly into quarters. -
Meat and Muscle Biology™ Introduction
Published June 7, 2018 Meat and Muscle Biology™ Meat Science Lexicon* Dennis L. Seman1, Dustin D. Boler2, C. Chad Carr3, Michael E. Dikeman4, Casey M. Owens5, Jimmy T. Keeton6, T. Dean Pringle7, Jeffrey J. Sindelar1, Dale R. Woerner8, Amilton S. de Mello9 and Thomas H. Powell10 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA 2University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 3University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 4Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA 5University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA 6Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 7University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 8Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 9University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA 10American Meat Science Association, Champaign, IL 61820, USA *Inquiries should be sent to: [email protected] Abstract: The American Meat Science Association (AMSA) became aware of the need to develop a Meat Science Lexi- con for the standardization of various terms used in meat sciences that have been adopted by researchers in allied fields, culinary arts, journalists, health professionals, nutritionists, regulatory authorities, and consumers. Two primary catego- ries of terms were considered. The first regarding definitions of meat including related terms, e.g., “red” and “white” meat. The second regarding terms describing the processing of meat. In general, meat is defined as skeletal muscle and associated tissues derived from mammals as well as avian and aquatic species. The associated terms, especially “red” and “white” meat have been a continual source of confusion to classify meats for dietary recommendations, communicate nutrition policy, and provide medical advice, but were originally not intended for those purposes. -
Title: Survey of Microbiological Status of Offal Products from Pork
Title: Survey of Microbiological Status of Offal Products from Pork Processing Facilities in the United States – NPB #16-162 Institution: South Dakota State University. Investigators: Alan Erickson (Principal Investigator), South Dakota State University; William Benjy Mikel, WPF Technical Services; Laura Ruesch SDSU; Jane Christopher-Hennings, SDSU; Monte Fuhrman, Pipestone Veterinary Services; Jonathan Ertl, Sioux Nation Ag Center. Date submitted: 10/31/17 Industry Summary: In the United States, approximately five million metric tons of pork variety meats and other byproducts are generated each year with a large amount of this material being rendered to generate low value products like pet food, meat/bone meal, fat, and grease. An alternative use of the US variety meats would be to market and sell them to consumers in countries like China that prefer strong tasting pork products like the variety meats. The desirability of these products in foreign markets makes them higher value products, which could help increase the value of live hogs for US producers. To be able to market and sell these variety meats in global markets, it is important to understand the microbiological status of these products. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to: Determine the microbiological profile of commonly consumed offal products (liver, heart, kidney, brain and intestine) as currently handled in pork production facilities in the United States. This microbiological profile will include tests for: mesophilic aerobic plate counts (APC), Salmonella, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Toxoplasma gondii. To address this objective, samples of heart, kidney, liver, brain and intestine were obtained from 15 pork processing plants in 10 states found across the Midwestern and Southeastern pork-producing region of the US. -
Vegetarianism and World Peace and Justice
Visit the Triangle-Wide calendar of peace events, www.trianglevegsociety.org/peacecalendar VVeeggeettaarriiaanniissmm,, WWoorrlldd PPeeaaccee,, aanndd JJuussttiiccee By moving toward vegetarianism, can we help avoid some of the reasons for fighting? We find ourselves in a world of conflict and war. Why do people fight? Some conflict is driven by a desire to impose a value system, some by intolerance, and some by pure greed and quest for power. The struggle to obtain resources to support life is another important source of conflict; all creatures have a drive to live and sustain themselves. In 1980, Richard J. Barnet, director of the Institute for Policy Studies, warned that by the end of the 20th century, anger and despair of hungry people could lead to terrorist acts and economic class war [Staten Island Advance, Susan Fogy, July 14, 1980, p.1]. Developed nations are the largest polluters in the world; according to Mother Jones (March/April 1997, http://www. motherjones.com/mother_jones/MA97/hawken2.html), for example, Americans, “have the largest material requirements in the world ... each directly or indirectly [using] an average of 125 pounds of material every day ... Americans waste more than 1 million pounds per person per year ... less than 5 percent of the total waste ... gets recycled”. In the US, we make up 6% of the world's population, but consume 30% of its resources [http://www.enough.org.uk/enough02.htm]. Relatively affluent countries are 15% of the world’s population, but consume 73% of the world’s output, while 78% of the world, in developing nations, consume 16% of the output [The New Field Guide to the U. -
Breeds of Swine
Breeds of Swine *Eight major breeds of swine produced in the US. *Dark breeds or terminal breeds are used for their production abilities such as meatiness, leanness, durability, growth rate, and feed efficiency. *White breeds or maternal breeds are used for their reproductive abilities such as mothering ability, litter size, and milking ability. Breeds of Swine Dark/Terminal Breeds White/Maternal Breeds Berkshire Chester White Duroc Landrace Hampshire Yorkshire Poland China Spot Berkshire Duroc Hampshire Poland China Spot Chester White Landrace Yorkshire Sex Classes of Swine *Gilt – Any female pig that has not yet given birth. *Sow – A female pig that has given birth. *Boar – An intact male hog kept only for breeding purposes. *Barrow – A castrated male hog used for meat. Scientific Classification of Swine Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Mammalia Order: Artiodactyla Suborder: Suina Family: Suidae Genus: Sus Species: domesticus Top Ten Swine Producing States 1. Iowa 6. Nebraska 2. North Carolina 7. Missouri 3. Minnesota 8. Oklahoma 4. Illinois 9. Kansas 5. Indiana 10. Ohio Top Five Swine Producing Countries 1. China 2. European Union 3. United States 4. Brazil 5. Canada Pig Vital Signs Normal Body Temperature 101-103°F Normal Heart Rate 60-80 beats/minute Normal Respiration Rate 30-40 breaths/minute Important Breeding Numbers Litter Size: 7-15 pigs Birth Weight: 2-3.5 lbs Weaned at: 21 days Sexual Maturity: 6-8 months # Ideal Number of Teats: 7 per side Estrous Cycle: 21 days (range of 19-21) # Duration of Estrus (heat): 2-3 days Gestation: 114 days (3 months, 3 weeks, 3 days) (range of 112-115) Important Weights of Hogs Birth Weight: 2-3.5 lbs Wean Weight: 15 lbs at 21 days Slaughter Weight: 250 lbs Mature Weight: Male 500-800 lbs Female 400-700 lbs Ear Notching System Right Ear Left Ear Litter Number Individual Pig Number *No more than 2 notches per area except for 81, only one notch. -
National Daily Hog and Pork Summary
National Daily Hog and Pork Summary Des Moines, Iowa Fri, Sep 24, 2021 USDA Livestock, Poultry & Grain Market News DAILY DIRECT HOGS PLANT DELIVERED as of 1:30 PM Weekly National P.M. Wtd Avg Negotiated Barrow and Gilt: Carcass Base Price Live Price $125 NATIONAL - AMS 2675/LM_HG203: $115 Range: $73.00 - $85.50 $52.00 - $61.00 $105 Weighted Average: $76.93 $58.43 $95 $85 Change from Prior Day: 0.40 higher no comparison $75 Head Count: 2,780 654 $65 IOWA/MINNESOTA - AMS 2675/LM_HG206: $55 $45 Weighted Average: *Price not reported *Price not reported $35 due to confidentiality* due to confidentiality* $25 J F M A M J J A S O N D 2021 2020 5 Yr Avg WESTERN CORNBELT - AMS 2675/LM_HG212: Weekly Ham Primal Value Weighted Average: *Price not reported *Price not reported $110 due to confidentiality* due to confidentiality* $100 $90 EASTERN CORNBELT - AMS 2675/LM_HG210: $80 $70 Weighted Average: *Price not reported *Price not reported due to confidentiality* due to confidentiality* $60 $50 NATIONAL DAILY PORK REPORT FOB PLANT- AMS 2498/LM_PK602: $40 Carcass Cutout Values 110.77 Change: 6.48 $30 J F M A M J J A S O N D Primal Loin 113.32 10.28 2021 2020 5 Yr Avg Primal Butt 114.36 1.15 Primal Picnic 76.36 (-4.87) SEW Pigs - 10# Basis - Delivered Primal Rib 129.78 (-2.16) $70 Primal Ham 91.70 16.48 $60 Primal Belly 179.50 2.77 $50 Total Loads 360.59 Pork Cuts 327.89 lds. -
Don't Fall for Tricky Meat & Poultry Claims
Lean? here do Wthe bro- chures, posters, and voluntary labels for meat get their num- bers? In most Don’t fall for tricky meat cases, from the USDA’s data- & poultry claims base. And where does the USDA BY LINDSAY MOYER & JENNIFER URBAN gets its numbers? 0" trim? Fat chance. It’s no secret that Americans need to cut back on meat. While we Mostly from, or now eat more chicken than beef, we still eat too much red meat, with funding from, the beef and pork industries. Hmm... especially beef. That’s bad news for our health and for the planet. The USDA’s database has numbers for beef that has had People who eat more red meat—especially processed meat—have the fat around its edges trimmed down to just ⁄8” or 0”. a higher risk of colon cancer, heart disease, and stroke. (The pork industry never even says how much its cuts were trimmed.) And it doesn’t help that misleading information about meat or The USDA also has numbers for what’s called “separable poultry can trick even the most careful shoppers. Here’s what to lean.” That’s after scalpel-wielding technicians trim off the watch out for. “separable fat”—every bit of fat except marbling within the muscle. Missing labels? All that trimming (where do you keep your scalpel?) helps explain how the beef industry’s website can end up touting voluntarily, you’re 38 cuts of “lean” beef. The list even includes fatty cuts like stuck with a brochure New York strip steak and brisket. -
Uniform Retail Meat Identity Standards a PROGRAM for the RETAIL MEAT INDUSTRY APPROVED NAMES PORK
Uniform Retail Meat Identity Standards A PROGRAM FOR THE RETAIL MEAT INDUSTRY APPROVED NAMES PORK This section is organized in the following order: SELECT AN AREA TO VIEW IT Species Cuts Chart LARGER SEE THE Species-Specific FOLLOWING Primal Information AREAS Index of Cuts Cut Nomenclature PORK -- Increasing in and U.P.C.Numbers Popularity Figure 1-- Primal (Wholesale) Cuts and Bone Structure of Pork Figure 2 -- Loin Roasts -- Center Chops INTRODUCTION Figure 3 -- Portion Pieces APPROVED NAMES -- Center Chops BEEF Figure 4-- Whole or Half Loins VEAL PORK Figure 5 -- Center Loin or Strip Loin LAMB GROUND MEATS Pork Belly EFFECTIVE MEATCASE MANAGEMENT & Pork Leg FOOD SAFETY MEAT COOKERY Pork Cuts GLOSSARY & REFERENCES Approved by the National Pork Board INDUSTRY-WIDE COOPERATIVE MEAT IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS COMMITTEE Uniform Retail Meat Identity Standards A PROGRAM FOR THE RETAIL MEAT INDUSTRY APPROVED NAMES PORK INTRODUCTION APPROVED NAMES BEEF VEAL PORK LAMB GROUND MEATS EFFECTIVE MEATCASE MANAGEMENT FOOD SAFETY MEAT COOKERY GLOSSARY & REFERENCES INDUSTRY-WIDE COOPERATIVE MEAT IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS COMMITTEE Uniform Retail Meat Identity Standards A PROGRAM FOR THE RETAIL MEAT INDUSTRY APPROVED NAMES PORK INTRODUCTION APPROVED NAMES BEEF VEAL PORK LAMB GROUND MEATS EFFECTIVE MEATCASE MANAGEMENT FOOD SAFETY MEAT COOKERY GLOSSARY & REFERENCES INDUSTRY-WIDE COOPERATIVE MEAT IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS COMMITTEE Uniform Retail Meat Identity Standards A PROGRAM FOR THE RETAIL MEAT INDUSTRY APPROVED NAMES PORK INTRODUCTION APPROVED NAMES BEEF -
Ingredients in Meat Products Rodrigo Tarté Editor
Ingredients in Meat Products Rodrigo Tarté Editor Ingredients in Meat Products Properties, Functionality and Applications iv Editor Rodrigo Tarté, Ph.D. Meat Science Research Research, Development & Quality Kraft Foods Inc. 910 Mayer Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53704 USA ISBN: 978-0-387-71326-7 e-ISBN: 978-0-387-71327-4 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-71327-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008939885 © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identifi ed as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper springer.com v Preface There is little doubt that today’s food industry is faced with a rapidly changing market landscape. The obvious need to continue to provide consumers with nutritious, delectable, safe, and affordable food products which are also profitable for food manufacturers, as well as the ongoing challenge of ensuring the delivery of adequate nutrition to hundreds of millions of disadvantaged people around the world, appears – at least as much as, if not more than, ever – to be at odds with the challenges posed by soaring energy and food commodity prices; fast-paced changes in consumer demographics, habits, and preferences; and the continual need to stay ahead of current and emerging food safety issues.