Commission Proposes Reform of Gibraltar Tax Regime

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Commission Proposes Reform of Gibraltar Tax Regime ,3 Brussels, 27 November 2002 &RPPLVVLRQSURSRVHVUHIRUPRI*LEUDOWDUWD[UHJLPH 7KH &RPPLVVLRQ KDV WRGD\ DGRSWHG D UHFRPPHQGDWLRQ WR WKH 8QLWHG .LQJGRP IRU WKH DEROLWLRQ RU UHIRUP RI WKH ([HPSW &RPSDQ\ UHJLPH LQ *LEUDOWDU8QGHUWKHUHJLPHDQ([HPSW&RPSDQ\SD\VQRLQFRPHWD[RQLWV SURILWV,QVWHDGLWLVVXEMHFWWRDORZIL[HGDQQXDOWD[7KH&RPPLVVLRQKDV GHFLGHG WKDW WKLV WD[ H[HPSWLRQ FRQVWLWXWHV 6WDWH DLG IDYRXULQJ ([HPSW &RPSDQLHV DQG VKRXOG WKHUHIRUH EH SKDVHG RXW E\ WKH HQG RI DW WKH ODWHVW 7KH([HPSW&RPSDQ\5HJLPH A company registered with the Gibraltar authorities as an Exempt Company is subject to a fixed annual tax of between £225 and £300 (around ¼¼ ,W LV exempt from any further taxation in Gibraltar. An Exempt Company is a financial services company domiciled in Gibraltar that may not conduct any trade or business within Gibraltar. No Gibraltarian or Gibraltar resident may have a beneficial interest in the shares of an Exempt Company. The Exempt Companies scheme can be classified as State aid as it fulfils the four relevant criteria for State aid: The exemption from tax grants Exempt Companies an advantage compared with other companies subject to the general company taxation regime in Gibraltar, under which the standard rate of tax on profits is 35%. This advantage is selective, is financed from State resources and is liable to distort competition. The regime satisfies none of the criteria set out in Articles 87(2) and 87(3) of the EC Treaty under which State aid may be approved. 7KH&RPPLVVLRQ¶VSURSRVDO In its proposal of appropriate measures to the United Kingdom, the Commission has recommended that the United Kingdom close the Exempt Company regime to new entrants and definitively abolish the tax exemption by the end of 2005 at the latest. The United Kingdom should also make a public statement on the steps it will take to repeal or reform the regime by the end of January 2003. Under the State aid rules, measures which were in place before the Member State concerned acceded to the European Union are treated as existing aid. Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty requires the Commission, in co-operation with the Member States, to keep existing aid schemes under constant review. If it is found that a scheme is not or is no longer compatible with the Treaty rules on State aids, the Commission must propose appropriate measures to the Member State concerned in order to abolish the scheme or bring it into conformity with the State aid rules. If the Member State accepts the proposal, it is legally bound to implement the appropriate measures. If it refuses, the Commission may open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty. %DFNJURXQG The Commission originally launched an inquiry into the Exempt Company regime on 11 July 2001 (see IP/01/982). However, following a legal challenge by the Government of Gibraltar, the Court of First Instance annulled, on 30 April 2002, the decision to open the formal investigation procedure. The Court ruled that in attacking the whole of the Exempt Company regime as illegal aid rather than treating the original 1967 legislation as existing aid, the Commission had breached the rules on State aid procedure. The Exempt Company regime forms part of the Gibraltar offshore sector together with the Qualifying Company regime. Qualifying Companies are subject to an ongoing investigation also launched on 11 July 2001. Separately, the Commission is investigating Gibraltar’s planned reform of its company taxation system (see IP/02/1484) 2.
Recommended publications
  • Income Tax Act 2010
    Income Tax 2010-21 INCOME TAX ACT 2010 Principal Act Act No 2010-21 Commencement (LN.2010/180) 1.1.2011 Assent 1.11.2010 Amending Relevant current Commencement enactments provisions date Act. 2011-11 s. 27 5.5.2011 2012-04 s. 14A 28.6.2012 LN. 2012/129 ss. 71, Sch. 5 & 9 4.10.2012 Act. 2012-14 ss. 39(3), (4)(a) & Sch. 10 1.7.2012 LN. 2013/0051 ss. 4 to 5F 1.1.2013 2013/081 s. 74(a) & (b) & Sch. 1 1.7.2013 2013/108 Sch. 5 1.7.2013 Act. 2013-28 Sch. 1 1.1.2014 2014-24 ss.14A(2), (3)(a), (5) & 14B 10.7.2014 ss. Schs. 1, 3, 2015-23 ss. 25A, Sch. 3, 9 1.1.2011 ss. 29, 30(1), 1.7.2013 ss. 13(1), Schs. 3, 7 1.7.2014 ss. 77, 78 22.6.2015 ss. 30(1)(b), (bb), Sch. 3 1.7.2015 ss. 6, 6A, 18A, 19, 30(1)(b), (c), 31, 31A, 32, 32A, 33, 34, 39(1)(b), (2), (4), (5), (6), (8), 41(10), 56A, 59, 59A, 60, 63, 63A, 64(1)(b), (c), 65, 65A-65F, 67(2), 68, Schs. 3, 7, 9, 10 6.8.2015 ss. 16, 29(1), (3) 1.1.2016 ss. 28(1) 1.7.2016 LN. 2015/239 ss. 5A(3), (5), (5A), 5D(5), 5F, 1.1.2016 2015/229 Sch. 5 31.12.2015 English sources None cited 1 Notice of corrigendum see LN. 2013/011 © Government of Gibraltar (www.gibraltarlaws.gov.gi) 2010-21 Income Tax Transposing: Directive 77/799/EEC Directive 2011/16/EU Directive 2011/96/EU Directive 2013/13/EU Directive 2014/86/EU Directive (EU) 2015/121 EU Legislation/International Agreements involved: © Government of Gibraltar (www.gibraltarlaws.gov.gi) Income Tax 2010-21 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Deloitte Proposal Document A4
    Global Tax Developments Quarterly Accounting for Income Taxes Summary of recent international tax developments that may have implications on accounting for income taxes under U.S. GAAP 1 April to 30 June 2013 12 July 2013 Issue 2013-2 Final Edition Contents Introduction 1 Enacted tax law changes — 1 April to 30 June 2013 2 Enacted tax law changes that are now effective — 1 April to 30 June 2013 6 Enacted tax law changes that are effective as from 1 July 2013 8 On the horizon… 9 Did you know? 13 Example disclosures 19 Quick reference guide — Applicable income tax rates 21 Additional resources 25 Contact us 26 As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte Tax LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Global Tax Developments Quarterly Accounting for Income Taxes Introduction Introduction This document contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this document, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This document is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. The information contained in this document was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties or sanctions imposed by any government or other regulatory body.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Client 2013 2Nd Edition
    The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2013 2nd Edition A practical cross-border insight into private client work Published by Global Legal Group, in association with CDR, with contributions from: Allen & Gledhill LLP Johnson Šťastný Kramařík, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o. Appleby Lenz & Staehelin Arqués Ribert Junyer – Advocats Macfarlanes LLP Bircham Dyson Bell LLP Maples and Calder Boga & Associates Marval, O’Farrell & Mairal Cone Marshall Ltd. Matheson Cruz & Co Miller Thomson LLP Debarliev, Dameski & Kelesoska Attorneys at Law O'Sullivan Estate Lawyers DLA Piper P+P Pöllath + Partners Dorda Brugger Jordis Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Frangos Saprykin Odynets International Law Company Taylor Wessing LLP Gordon S. Blair Law Offices Tirard, Naudin Greenille The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2013 General Chapters: 1 Overview of the UK Immigration System – Helen Darling & James Chilvers, Macfarlanes LLP 1 2 Estate Planning for International Families – James Johnston & Victoria Johnson, Bircham Dyson Bell LLP 8 Contributing Editors 3 Key Succession Issues for the Multijurisdictional Estate – Margaret O’Sullivan, Owen Clutton & Jonathan Conder, Macfarlanes LLP O’Sullivan Estate Lawyers 14 Account Managers 4 Structuring and Governing a Family Business – Mustafa Hussain, Taylor Wessing LLP 20 Brigitte Descacq, Dror Levy, Maria Lopez, Florjan Osmani, Samuel Romp, Country Question and Answer Chapters: Oliver Smith, Rory Smith, Toni Wyatt 5 Albania Boga & Associates: Mirjeta Emini
    [Show full text]
  • Getting the Deal Through: Private Client 2017
    GETTING THROUGH THE DEAL Private Client Private Client Private Contributing editors Anthony Thompson and Nicole Aubin-Parvu 2017 2017 © Law Business Research 2016 Private Client 2017 Contributing editors Anthony Thompson and Nicole Aubin-Parvu Gowling WLG (UK) LLP Publisher Law The information provided in this publication is Gideon Roberton general and may not apply in a specific situation. [email protected] Business Legal advice should always be sought before taking Research any legal action based on the information provided. Subscriptions This information is not intended to create, nor does Sophie Pallier Published by receipt of it constitute, a lawyer–client relationship. [email protected] Law Business Research Ltd The publishers and authors accept no responsibility 87 Lancaster Road for any acts or omissions contained herein. The Senior business development managers London, W11 1QQ, UK information provided was verified between Alan Lee Tel: +44 20 3708 4199 September andNovember 2016. Be advised that this [email protected] Fax: +44 20 7229 6910 is a developing area. Adam Sargent © Law Business Research Ltd 2016 [email protected] No photocopying without a CLA licence. Printed and distributed by First published 2012 Encompass Print Solutions Dan White Fifth edition Tel: 0844 2480 112 [email protected] ISSN2051-5472 © Law Business Research 2016 CONTENTS Overview 5 Italy 63 Anthony Thompson and Nicole Aubin-Parvu Marco Cerrato and Alessandro Bavila Gowling WLG (UK) LLP Maisto e Associati Belgium 7 Japan 68 Saskia Lust, Barbara Albrecht and Jan Jorissen Kenichi Sadaka, Kei Sasaki and Akira Tanaka Loyens & Loeff Anderson Mōri & Tomotsune Bermuda 12 Jersey 75 Jane Collis and Louise Charleson Edward Devenport and Giles Corbin MJM Limited Mourant Ozannes Brazil 17 Liechtenstein 80 Felipe Katz Philip Georg Raich Katz Advogados Gasser Partner Cyprus 22 Monaco 84 Despina Sofokleous, Lorenzo Toffoloni Christine Pasquier-Ciulla & Regina Griciuc Andreas Th.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Tax Law Highlights of 2018
    EU Tax Law Highlights of 2018 In the course of 2018 there were several major developments in EU tax law. This annual edition of EU Tax Alert provides an overview of those developments. 2 Highlights in this edition In the course of 2018 there were several major developments in EU tax law. This annual edition of EU Tax Alert provides an overview of those developments, in which we highlight: - State aid decisions and Commission actions concerning certain MNEs - EU Mandatory Disclosure Rules for intermediaries applying to cross-border tax advice - Developments concerning the CCTB and digital taxation proposals - Relevant CJ decisions in the field of direct and indirect taxation EU Tax Law Highlights 3 Contents State Aid - CJ confirms application of the “per-element approach” and rules that Dutch tax consolidation infringes the - CJ rules on taxes on large retail establishments by freedom of establishment (X NV and N BV) Spanish autonomous regions (ANGED) - CJ precludes provision of an international agreement - CJ rules on German Loss carry forward decision between Member States allowing for arbitral tribunal (Heitkamp) (Achmea) - CJ overturns annulment of Spanish tax lease decision - CJ rules on the personal scope of the Swiss-EU - CJ rules that exemption from real estate transfer tax Agreement in the context of the French exit tax (Picart) in the context of a restructuring within a group is not - CJ rules that Danish legislation that precludes the State aid (A-Braunerei) deduction of ‘final losses’ incurred by foreign PE is not - EU State
    [Show full text]
  • Private Client 2018 7Th Edition
    TheICLG International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2018 7th Edition A practical cross-border insight into private client work Published by Global Legal Group, in association with CDR, with contributions from: Aird & Berlis LLP Maples and Calder Alon Kaplan, Advocate and Notary Law Office Matheson Aronson, Ronkin-Noor, Eyal Law Firm Miller Thomson LLP Arqués Ribert Junyer – Advocats MJM Limited Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Bircham Dyson Bell LLP Mourant Ozannes Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP New Quadrant Partners Limited DORDA Rechtsanwälte GmbH O’Sullivan Estate Lawyers LLP Griffiths & Partners and Coriats Trust Company Limited Ospelt & Partner Attorneys at Law Ltd. Hassans International Law Firm P+P Pöllath + Partners Higgs & Johnson Rovsing & Gammeljord Holland & Knight LLP Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Spenser & Kauffmann Attorneys at Law Khaitan & Co Studio Tributario Associato Facchini Rossi & Soci (FRS) Lebenberg Advokatbyrå AB Tirard, Naudin, Société d’avocats Lenz & Staehelin Vieira de Almeida Loyens & Loeff Withers Bergman LLP Macfarlanes LLP Zepos & Yannopoulos The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2018 General Chapters: 1 BREXIT: The Immigration Implications – James Perrott, Macfarlanes LLP 1 2 Keep Calm and Carry On: The Increasing UK Regulatory and Tax Issues Facing Offshore Trustees – Matthew Braithwaite & Helen Ratcliffe, Bircham Dyson Bell LLP 11 3 Pre-Immigration Planning Considerations for the HNW Client – Think
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Ec Competition Policy Newsletter
    ISSN 1025-2266 COMPETITION POLICY NEWSLETTER EC COMPETITION POLICY NEWSLETTER Editors: 2003 Æ NUMBER 1 Æ SPRING Linsey Mc Callum Published three times a year by the Nicola Pesaresi Competition Directorate-General of the European Commission Address: European Commission, J-70, 00/123 Also available online: Brussel B-1049 Bruxelles http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/publications/cpn/ Tel.: (32-2) 295 76 20 Fax: (32-2) 295 54 37 World Wide Web: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ competition/index_en.html INSIDE: Introduction by Philip LOWE Regulation 1/2003: a modernised application of EC competition rules Reform of the EU Merger Control System — a comprehensive package of proposals Retail banking, social inclusion and public service Commission adopts Regulation exempting State aid for employment from notification under Article 88(1) Accession negotiations brought to successful conclusion Some reflections on the structure of the state aid rules in the Treaty of Rome European Competition Day Main developments on Antitrust — Merger control — State aid control — International cooperation EUROPEAN COMMISSION Contents 1 Introduction by Philip LOWE Articles 3 Regulation 1/2003: a modernised application of EC competition rules by Gianfranco ROCCA — Céline GAUER, Dorothe DALHEIMER, Lars KJOLBYE and Eddy DE SMIJTER 9 Reform of the EU Merger Control System — a comprehensive package of proposals by Stephen A. RYAN 14 Retail banking, social inclusion and public service by Nicola PESARESI and Odile PILLEY 21 Commission adopts Regulation exempting State aid
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE No: 165/2021 Date: 25th February 2021 Chief Minister’s note on Parliamentary Resolution for the Introduction of Gazette Notice to Implement Tax Treaty with Spain Introduction 1. The UK, Gibraltar and Spain negotiated and ultimately arrived at an in-principle agreement for an International Agreement on Taxation and the Protection of Financial Interests that was finalised in November 2018. This Treaty was signed on 4 March 2019 by the UK as the state responsible for Gibraltar’s external relations under the Gibraltar Constitution. 2. The application of the Treaty does not prejudice the position on sovereignty, jurisdiction or control of Gibraltar. Purpose 3. The Treaty’s purpose is to improve and enhance administrative co-operation in tax matters, to assist in resolving tax residency disputes and to avoid incidences of double taxation between Gibraltar and Spain. 4. The Government’s strategy is influenced by the general direction of travel of international tax standards regarding transparency and cooperation. Adherence to these standards prevent double non-taxation and encourage cooperation and exchange of information. 5. It also demonstrates Gibraltar’s commitment to maintain measures equivalent with EU law on matters related to tax transparency and good governance following the exit from the EU. 6. This is in line with Gibraltar’s international tax compliance strategy and to the approach taken regarding other initiatives and measures from the OECD and G20 summit. 7. As part of this overall strategy, the Government acknowledges the important outcomes that can be achieved from the active participation in international forums. It therefore remains fully committed to this.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibraltar Tax Facts 2017-2018
    www.pwc.gi Gibraltar Tax Facts 2017/2018 A practical and easy-to-follow guide to the Gibraltar tax system. July 2017 This booklet is also available online at www.pwc.gi Table of contents A list of PwC Gibraltar contacts is provided at the back of this guide should you require more detailed advice or assistance tailored to your specific needs. Budget summary .............................................................. 1 This booklet is based on taxation law and practice in Gibraltar as at July 2017. Who is liable to taxation in Gibraltar? ............................... 3 Individuals ...................................................................... 3 It is intended to provide a general guide only to the subject matter and is necessarily in a Companies ....................................................................... 3 condensed form, it should not be regarded as a basis for ascertaining the liability to tax in specific circumstances. Professional advice should always be taken before acting on any The standard rate of taxation ............................................ 4 information in the booklet. Partnerships ..................................................................... 4 Branches .......................................................................... 4 Trusts ............................................................................... 4 Foundations ................................................................. 4 Taxable income ................................................................ 4 Dividends
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World 1982 Complete Book — Download
    Freedom in the World Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1982 A FREEDOM HOUSE BOOK Greenwood Press issues the Freedom House series "Studies in Freedom" in addition to the Freedom House yearbook Freedom in the World. Strategies for the 1980s: Lessons of Cuba, Vietnam, and Afghanistan by Philip van Slyck. Studies in Freedom, Number 1 Freedom in the World Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1982 Raymond D. Gastil With Essays by Charles R. Beitz Jeffrey M. Riedinger Grace Goodell Leonard R. Sussman Stephen J. Morris George Weigel John P. Powelson Lindsay M. Wright Roy L. Prosterman GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London, England Copyright © 1982 by Freedom House, Inc. Freedom House, 20 West 40th Street, New York, New York 10018 All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. ISBN: 0-313-23178-8 First published in 1982 Greenwood Press A division of Congressional Information Service, Inc. 88 Post Road West Westport, Connecticut 06881 Printed in the United States of America 10 987654321 Contents MAP AND TABLES vii PREFACE ix PART I. THE SURVEY IN 1982 Freedom in the Comparative Survey 3 Survey Ratings and Tables for 1982 9 PART II. ANALYZING SPECIFIC CIVIL LIBERTIES A Comparative Survey of Economic Freedoms Lindsay M. Wright 51 Worker Freedoms in Latin America 91 The Continuing Struggle for Freedom of Information Leonard R. Sussman 101 A Preliminary Examination of Religious Freedom George Weigel 121 PART III. DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Democracy in Developing Societies Charles R. Beitz 145 The Democratic Prerequisites of Development Grace Goodell and John P.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Our Tax Systems Meet Rule of Law Standards Law
    DO OUR TAX SYSTEMS MEET RULE OF LAW STANDARDSSTANDARDS???? Conference Papers, 20 November 2013 Edited By Justine N Stefanelli Lucy Moxham Bingham Centre Working Paper 2014/2014/06060606,, September 2014 www.binghamcentre.biicl.org Citation: This paper should be cited as: J N Stefanelli & L Moxham (Eds), Do Our Tax Systems Meet Rule of Law Standards? Conference Papers 20 November 2013 (Bingham Centre Working Paper 2014/06 ), Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, BIICL, London, September 2014. Copyright: © Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law. This document is available for download from the Bingham Centre’s web site. It is not to be reproduced in any other form without the Centre’s express written permission. Individual papers are © of the authors. AAAboutAbout the Bingham Centre Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law Charles Clore House 17 Russell Square London WC1B 5JP Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 5154 Email: [email protected] Web: www.binghamcentre.biicl.org The Bingham Centre was launched in December 2010. The Centre is named after Lord Bingham of Cornhill KG, the pre-eminent judge of his generation and a passionate advocate of the rule of law. The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law is an independent research institute devoted to the study and promotion of the rule of law worldwide. It is distinguished in the UK and internationally by its specific focus on the rule of law. Its focus is on understanding and promoting the rule of law; considering the challenges it faces; providing an intellectual framework within which it can operate; and fashioning the practical tools to support it.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Tax 2010-21
    Income Tax 2010-21 INCOME TAX ACT 2010 Principal Act Act No 2010-21 Commencement (LN.2010/180) 1.1.2011 Assent 1.11.2010 Amending Relevant current Commencement enactments provisions date Act. 2011-11 s. 27 5.5.2011 2012-04 s. 14A 28.6.2012 LN. 2012/129 ss. 71, Sch. 5 & 9 4.10.2012 Act. 2012-14 ss. 39(3), (4)(a) & Sch. 10 1.7.2012 LN. 2013/0051 ss. 4 to 5F 1.1.2013 2013/081 s. 74(a) & (b) & Sch. 1 1.7.2013 2013/108 Sch. 5 1.7.2013 Act. 2013-28 Sch. 1 1.1.2014 2014-24 ss.14A(2), (3)(a), (5) & 14B 10.7.2014 ss. Schs. 1, 3, 2015-23 ss. 25A, Sch. 3, 9 1.1.2011 ss. 29, 30(1), 1.7.2013 ss. 13(1), Schs. 3, 7 1.7.2014 ss. 77, 78 22.6.2015 ss. 30(1)(b), (bb), Sch. 3 1.7.2015 ss. 6, 6A, 18A, 19, 30(1)(b), (c), 31, 31A, 32, 32A, 33, 34, 39(1)(b), (2), (4), (5), (6), (8), 41(10), 56A, 59, 59A, 60, 63, 63A, 64(1)(b), (c), 65, 65A-65F, 67(2), 68, Schs. 3, 7, 9, 10 6.8.2015 ss. 16, 29(1), (3) 1.1.2016 ss. 28(1) 1.7.2016 LN. 2015/239 ss. 5A(3), (5), (5A), 5D(5), 5F, 1.1.2016 2015/229 Sch. 5 31.12.2015 2016/253 ss. 5D(5), 5F 22.12.2016 2016/246 ss.
    [Show full text]