DOCSLIB.ORG

HRA Screening- Ivy Cottage Bordon GU35

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Unit 13 & 14, Sandy Farm Business Centre, Sands Road, Farnham, GU10 1PX Email: [email protected] www.darwin-ecology.co.uk Ecological walkover and Information to inform a HRA Ivy Cottage, Bordon, Lindford GU35 0DE April 2021 Darwin Ecology Ltd Registered Office: 8 Layton Lane, Shaftesbury, Dorset SP7 8EY Company No. 07654823 Ivy Cottage, Bordon - Information for HRA QUALITY CONTROL The information which we have prepared and provided is true, and has been prepared and provided in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. Prepared by Genevieve Labram- Ecologist March 2021 Checked by Holly Stanworth- Senior Ecologist April 2021 This report remains valid for 12 months from date of issue. Survey data are valid for 12-24 months from the date the survey was undertaken. Copyright Darwin Ecology Ltd. This report is intended for the commissioning party only and should not be copied or reproduced in any way without prior written permission from Darwin Ecology Ltd. This report has been prepared for the sole use of the client. Any third party referring to this report or relying on the information contained herein, does so entirely at their own risk. Whilst every effort has been made to guarantee the accuracy of this report, it should be noted that living creatures are capable of migration and whilst protected species may not have been located during the survey duration, their presence may be found on site at a later date. The views and opinions contained within the document are based on a reasonable timeframe between the completion of the survey and the commencement of any works. If there is any delay between the commencement of works that may conflict with timeframes laid out within this document, or have the potential to allow the ingress of protected species, a suitably qualified ecologist should be consulted. It is the duty of care of the landowner/developer to act responsibly and comply with current environmental legislation if protected species are suspected or found prior to works. 2 Ivy Cottage, Bordon - Information for HRA 1. Executive summary 1.1. Darwin Ecology Ltd. have been commissioned to provide a report to inform a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) for the proposed development at Ivy Cottage, Bordon, Surrey, This assessment was triggered as the site falls 1.63km south from the Wealden Heaths II Special Protection Area (SPA). The Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) screening report is carried out to assess for any likely significant effects of a proposed development on the integrity of Wealden Heaths II Special Protection Area (SPA). 1.2. A site visit was conducted in order to provide context to the site and surroundings, Ecologist Genevieve Labram MSc BSc (Hons) visited the site on 25th March 2021 to conduct an ecological assessment of the site. 1.3. Habitats on site included amenity grassland and species poor hedges typical of a garden. No habitats of significant ecological value were identified. A precautionary method for the possible presence of bats, hedgehog and breeding birds is recommended. No further protected species surveys are required. 1.4. The proposals will result in a net gain of 4 additional units, (a total of 5), with an anticipated 12 additional residents. 1.5. It is considered that the proposed development will not result in significant impacts during the construction or operational phases from direct land take, pressure, urbanisation or, hydrological changes. 1.6. The impacts of recreational and atmospheric pollution pressure are anticipated to be limited, but not significant to Wealden Heaths SPA. 1.7. East Hampshire’s new Local Plan Habitats Regulation Assessment is currently out for consultation and is not yet implemented. However as outlined in the Interim plan, it is anticipated that for dwellings less than a net gain of 20 units located between 400m and 5km of the Wealden hearths SPA, a financial contribution may be required for the upkeep or creation of a Suitable area of Natural Greenspaces (SANG). This would be inline requirements with similar SPAs (thames basin heaths) however confirmation on this policy should come from Natural England and the local council. 1.8. Recommendations for biodiversity enhancements post development are provided as required under NPPF. 3 Ivy Cottage, Bordon - Information for HRA 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1. Darwin Ecology Ltd. have been commissioned to provide a report to inform a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) for the proposed development at Ivy Cottage, Bordon, Surrey, GU35 0DE. This report is required to provide East Hampshire District Council with the information they require to undertake a Habitats Regulations Assessment in relation to the adjacent European designated sites in their role as a Competent Authority. 2.2. This assessment was triggered as the site falls 1.63km south from the Wealden Heaths II Special Protection Area (SPA). The Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) screening report is carried out to assess for any likely significant effects of a proposed development on the integrity of Wealden Heaths II Special Protection Area (SPA). This forms part of a planning application at the above address for the proposed development of two semi-detached houses, with associated access, car parking, and landscaping. This report aims to supply the council with sufficient information to conclude that there would not be an adverse effect on the integrity of the European designated sites in line with the tests under Regulation 63 of the Habitat & Species Regulation 2017 (as amended) so that an informed planning decision can be made. 2.3. The Wealden Heaths Phase I and II SPA was designated in 1994 and is protected from adverse impact under European and UK law. The Wealden Heaths II SPA network is a network of heathland sites which are designated for providing suitable habitat for breeding populations of the internationally important bird species including woodlark Lullula arborea, nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus and Dartford warbler Sylvia undata. The SPA is a strictly protected site classified in accordance with Article 7 of the EC Birds Directive. 2.4. In order to provide context to the site and surroundings, Ecologist Genevieve Labram MSc BSc (Hons) visited the site on 25th March 2021 to conduct an ecological assessment of the site. Site Overview 2.5. The site comprises approximately 700m2 of garden and hardstanding habitat within the existing residential area of Bordon. 2.6. The site is currently occupied by two tenants. The garden of the site is predominately vegetated with neutral grass and a single semi-mature tree. The site is surrounded by other residential properties and is delineated by 2m wooden fencing on all sides. Access is via Chalet Hill. 4 Ivy Cottage, Bordon - Information for HRA 2.7. The site is situated within the residential area of Bordon, Hampshire (Figures 1 & 2). The site is not located immediately near any significant connective ecological features, Dead-water Valley Local Nature Reserve (LNR) is present approximately 100m to the north, forming Alexandra Park. 2.8. Photos of the site and the habitats due to be impacted by the works, the sites context within the landscape and the proposed development plans are shown below: CHALET HILL 6384 902 3293 CHALET HILL 25267 © Crown copyright and database rights 2020 OS 100047474 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION CLIENT: Place Property Management Ivy Cottage 116 Chalet Hill, Bordon, Hampshire, GU35 0DE. Architectural Services t : 01428 879450 / 01243 767440 w: architectural.uk.com BLOCK PLAN (1:500) DRAWING: Location Plan 1:500 0 10 20 30 40 50 1:1250 0 10 20 30 40 50 NOTES DRG NO. DATE: SCALE: 1) All new and existing building work dimensions are critical to the construction process. 2) Cill and window heights indicated are taken internally and should be checked on site 3) This drawing is subject to copyright of Architectural Services. Reproduction only with written authority. 4) Drawing dimensions and scales to be checked prior to commencement of work. 5) All structural work where mentioned on this drawing is subject to a qualified structural and civil engineer calculations before building work commences. 6) These plans may be subject to Planning and/or Building Regulation approval, or any other statute in law before the commencement of building works. 7) All materials to match existing unless otherwise stated. 07/100-008 04/05/20 A3: 1:1250 Illustration 1: Copy of proposed and existing development plans provided by Architecture Services as of April 2021. Provided for context only. 5 Ivy Cottage, Bordon - Information for HRA Map 1: The site is located within the town of Bordon and outlined in the red boundary. Map 2: The site is located within the town of Lindford and outlined in the red boundary. 6 Ivy Cottage, Bordon - Information for HRA 3. LEGISLATION & PLANNING POLICY 3.1. Article 6 of EU Habitats Directive on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (Council Directive 92/43/EEC) states: ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to an appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives... competent national authorities shall agree to the plan or project only after having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned and, if appropriate, after having obtained the opinion of the public’. 3.2. Article 6 of the Habitats Directive has been transposed into UK law through the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended) and has developed through the planning system, case law and guidance originally prepared by David Tyldesley and Associates into a process known as a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA).
Recommended publications
  • 1St – 31St May 2021 Welcome

    1St – 31St May 2021 Welcome

    ALTON Walking & Cycling Festival 1st – 31st May 2021 Welcome... Key: to Alton Town Councils walking and cycling festival. We are delighted that Walking experience isn’t necessary for this year’s festival is able to go ahead and that we are able to offer a range Easy: these as distances are relatively short and paths and of walks and cycle rides that will suit not only the more experienced enthusiast gradients generally easy. These walks will be taken but also provide a welcome introduction to either walking or cycling, or both! at a relaxed pace, often stopping briefly at places of Alton Town Council would like wish to thank this year’s main sponsor, interest and may be suitable for family groups. the Newbury Buiding Society and all of the volunteers who have put together a programme to promote, share and develop walking and cycling in Moderate: These walks follow well defined paths and tracks, though they may be steep in places. They and around Alton. should be suitable for most people of average fitness. Please Note: Harder: These walks are more demanding and We would remind all participants that they must undertake a self-assessment there will be some steep climbs and/or sustained for Covid 19 symptoms and no-one should be participating in a walk or cylcle ascent and descent and rough terrain. These walks ride if they, or someone they live with, or have recently been in close contact are more suitable for those with a good level of with have displayed any symptoms. fitness and stamina.
  • Landowner Deposits Register

    Landowner Deposits Register

    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers

    Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers

    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
  • Natural England Standard A4 Word Template

    Natural England Standard A4 Word Template

    European Site Conservation Objectives: Supplementary advice on conserving and restoring site features East Hampshire Hangers Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Site Code: UK0012723 Photo credit: Peter Wakely, Natural England/Flickr Date of Publication: 11 February 2019 Page 1 of 31 About this document This document provides Natural England’s supplementary advice about the European Site Conservation Objectives relating to East Hampshire Hangers SAC. This advice should therefore be read together with the SAC Conservation Objectives available here. You should use the Conservation Objectives, this Supplementary Advice and any case-specific advice given by Natural England, when developing, proposing or assessing an activity, plan or project that may affect this site. This Supplementary Advice to the Conservation Objectives presents attributes which are ecological characteristics of the designated species and habitats within a site. The listed attributes are considered to be those that best describe the site’s ecological integrity and which, if safeguarded, will enable achievement of the Conservation Objectives. Each attribute has a target which is either quantified or qualitative depending on the available evidence. The target identifies as far as possible the desired state to be achieved for the attribute. The tables provided below bring together the findings of the best available scientific evidence relating to the site’s qualifying features, which may be updated or supplemented in further publications from Natural England and other sources. The local evidence used in preparing this supplementary advice has been cited. The references to the national evidence used are available on request. Where evidence and references have not been indicated, Natural England has applied ecological knowledge and expert judgement.
  • Wealden Heaths and Shortheath Common 2018 Visitor Surveys

    Wealden Heaths and Shortheath Common 2018 Visitor Surveys

    Wealden Heaths and Shortheath Common 2018 Visitor Surveys Chris Panter FOOTPRINT ECOLOGY, FOREST OFFICE, BERE ROAD, WAREHAM, DORSET BH20 7PA WWW.FOOTPRINT-ECOLOGY.CO.UK 01929 552444 Footprint Contract Reference: 477 Date: 16th November 2018 Version: Final Recommended Citation: Panter, C. 2018. Wealden Heaths and Shortheath Common 2018 Visitor Surveys. Unpublished report. 1 2018 Wealden Heaths Visitor Survey Summary This report provides the results of a visitor survey at a number of heathland sites in East Hampshire, part of the Wealden Heaths, including the nearby Shortheath Common. These surveys update a previous survey undertaken in 2012. Surveys covered five separate heathland sites (using 23 survey locations), and involved face-to-face interviews and tally counts of passing people between 9th June and 21st July 2018. 16 hours of surveys were undertaken at each survey point (368 hours of survey in total). We recorded a total of 1,370 groups, consisting of 2,012 people, entering the sites. The mean group size across all survey sites was 1.5 people with 1.3 adults, 0.2 minors and 1.0 dogs per group. The busiest site was by far Ludshott & Bramshott, with an average of 11 people entering per hour, compared to just 2.3 at Shortheath. At individual survey points, the number of people per hour ranged from 26 at Ludshott, Waggoner’s Wells to 0.3 at Woolmer, Hollywater layby. Numbers of dogs were also counted: there were 10 survey points where the number of dogs exceeded the number of groups, and therefore on average, more than 1.0 dogs per group.
  • Section 2A: Biodiversity Audit

    Section 2A: Biodiversity Audit

    Biodiversity Action Plan for East Hampshire Section 2a: Biodiversity Audit Section 2: Biodiversity Data - 1 - Biodiversity Action Plan for East Hampshire Introduction Biodiversity in East Hampshire is currently, and has been for centuries, extremely varied, due to the diverse geology and ancient history of natural and human processes occurring on the land. The district’s landscapes and the habitats and species they host are outlined in Section 1. Given below is a more detailed account of the extent, distribution and condition of the district’s biodiversity, using the best available knowledge. Habitats Shown below are maps of the district, showing each habitat type – these are derived from a county-wide programme to assess habitat types, using data held by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre. Also at county-wide level are A Biodiversity Action Plan for Hampshire’s Habitat Action Plans (HAPs) (www.hampshirebiodiversity.org.uk/vol-two.html ). These plans outline priority actions for each habitat type, which have been translated into district-level action in Section 3 through consultation with partners. • All mapped habitats correspond with the Priority Habitats in A Biodiversity Action Plan for Hampshire except: o Arable o Improved Grassland o Coniferous woodland o Urban The maps show that Hampshire’s priority habitats such as calcareous grassland are fragmented and small in area compared to agricultural and urban land uses, but that these fragments correspond to the familiar landscapes in the district such as chalk downland. Other habitat types, such as the mosaic of Wealden heathland and acidic grasslands in the north-east of the area, are larger and in closer proximity to each other.
  • 19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC

    19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC

    Submitted to Client: Submitted by: South Downs National Park AECOM Authority Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment July 2018 AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page ii Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: Dr James Riley Senior Ecologist Technical Director Approved by: Dr James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 DRAFT IHH JR 05/05/17 1 Following client comments IHH JR 30/06/17 2 Incorporating air quality impact assessment IHH JR 01/08/17 3 Updated to address Pre-Submission Local Plan and IHH JR 13/09/17 incorporate air quality analysis for Ashdown Forest SAC 4 Update to reflect Consultation Comments and policy update IHH JR 16/03/18 5 New report produced in response to Sweetman European MK JR 24/07/18 Court of Justice ruling Midpoint, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com July 2018 Limitations South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations July 2018 Assessment AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page iii AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the South Downs National Park Authority (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
  • Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report

    Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report

    Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Final report Prepared by LUC July 2020 Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Project Number 11113 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for client comment K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 26.06.2020 2. Final for consultation K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 07.07.2020 Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning Lancaster Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning London 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment Manchester London SE1 8UL Landscape Planning & Assessment Landscape Management landuse.co.uk 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background to the Local Plan 1 The requirement to undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment of Development Plans 2 Stages of HRA 2 Recent case law changes 4 Previous HRA work 5 Structure of this report 5 Chapter 2 Approach to HRA 6 Screening methodology 6 Appropriate Assessment 9 Chapter 3 Scope of HRA 11 European sites that may be affected by the Local Plan 11 Potential broad impacts from the Local Plan 18 Chapter 4 Next Steps 21 Appendix A Attributes of European Sites with the potential to be affected by the Local Plan A-1 Appendix B Other plans and projects with the potential for in-combination effects B-1 LUC I i -Chapter 1 Introduction Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction An introduction to Habitats Regulations Assessment and the Winchester District Local Plan LUC has been commissioned by Winchester City Council to carry out a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of its emerging Local Plan.
  • South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034)

    South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034)

    South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034) Adopted March 2017 (Updated July 2018) South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy 2017 - 2034 Contents Figure i: South Hampshire part of the PUSH Sub-Region: ......................................................................... 1 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background and Purpose of the South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy ........................... 2 1.2 The Benefits of a Green Infrastructure Approach ......................................................................... 5 2. Drivers for a strategic GI approach ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 National Planning Policy ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2 25 Year Environment Plan ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3 PUSH Spatial Position Statement 2016 ...................................................................................... 14 2.4 Solent, New Forest and River Itchen European Protected Sites ................................................... 17 2.5 Protected Landscapes .............................................................................................................. 19 3. A GI Strategy for South Hampshire ..................................................................................................
  • Download the South-East IAP Report Here

    Download the South-East IAP Report Here

    Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) in the Environment Agency Southern Region Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs and Mike Athanson Report prepared by: Report produced for: Pond Conservation Environment Agency c/o Oxford Brookes University Southern Regional Office Gipsy Lane, Headington Guildbourne House Oxford, OX3 0BP Chatsworth Road, Worthing Sussex, BN11 1LD Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who took time to send pond data and pictures or other information for this assessment. In particular: Adam Fulton, Alex Lockton, Alice Hiley, Alison Cross, Alistair Kirk, Amanda Bassett, Andrew Lawson, Anne Marston, Becky Collybeer, Beth Newman, Bradley Jamieson, Catherine Fuller, Chris Catling, Daniel Piec, David Holyoak, David Rumble, Debbie Miller, Debbie Tann, Dominic Price, Dorothy Wright, Ed Jarzembowski, Garf Williams, Garth Foster, Georgina Terry, Guy Hagg, Hannah Cook, Henri Brocklebank, Ian Boyd, Jackie Kelly, Jane Frostick, Jay Doyle, Jo Thornton, Joe Stevens, John Durnell, Jonty Denton, Katharine Parkes, Kevin Walker, Kirsten Wright, Laurie Jackson, Lee Brady, Lizzy Peat, Martin Rand, Mary Campling, Matt Shardlow, Mike Phillips, Naomi Ewald, Natalie Rogers, Nic Ferriday, Nick Stewart, Nicky Court, Nicola Barnfather, Oli Grafton, Pauline Morrow, Penny Green, Pete Thompson, Phil Buckley, Philip Sansum, Rachael Hunter, Richard Grogan, Richard Moyse, Richard Osmond, Rufus Sage, Russell Wright, Sarah Jane Chimbwandira, Sheila Brooke, Simon Weymouth, Steph Ames, Terry Langford, Tom Butterworth, Tom Reid, Vicky Kindemba. Cover photograph: Low Weald Pond, Lee Brady Report production: February 2009 Consultation: March 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat and play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. However, they are vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining.
  • South-Central England Regional Action Plan

    South-Central England Regional Action Plan

    Butterfly Conservation South-Central England Regional Action Plan This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW by Dr Andy Barker, Mike Fuller & Bill Shreeves August 2000 Registered Office of Butterfly Conservation: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP. Registered in England No. 2206468 Registered Charity No. 254937. Executive Summary This document sets out the 'Action Plan' for butterflies, moths and their habitats in South- Central England (Dorset, Hampshire, Isle of Wight & Wiltshire), for the period 2000- 2010. It has been produced by the three Branches of Butterfly Conservation within the region, in consultation with various other governmental and non-governmental organisations. Some of the aims and objectives will undoubtedly be achieved during this period, but some of the more fundamental challenges may well take much longer, and will probably continue for several decades. The main conservation priorities identified for the region are as follows: a) Species Protection ! To arrest the decline of all butterfly and moth species in South-Central region, with special emphasis on the 15 high priority and 6 medium priority butterfly species and the 37 high priority and 96 medium priority macro-moths. ! To seek opportunities to extend breeding areas, and connectivity of breeding areas, of high and medium priority butterflies and moths. b) Surveys, Monitoring & Research ! To undertake ecological research on those species for which existing knowledge is inadequate. Aim to publish findings of research. ! To continue the high level of butterfly transect monitoring, and to develop a programme of survey work and monitoring for the high and medium priority moths.
  • Essex Acid Grassland Surveys

    Essex Acid Grassland Surveys

    13. Essex 13.1 Physical Geology The solid geology of Essex is buried by drifr over about half of the county. Chalk outcrops in the far north west, whilst ridges of Tertiary sand and clay outcrop in the south and east. The north western half of the county is dominated by boulder clay, but gravels of various sorts also occur here, and gravels are extensive in the south and east. Soils Dry acid soils are not recorded as abundant within Essex according to the soil association map (Map Ib). 13.2 Landscape history 19th Century In the early 19th century unenclosed heathlands were scattered through the east of the county, especially on the Tertiary ridges. In the south there were several large pasture woodlands including Epping Forest. Current landscapes and Natural Areas English Nature divides the county between the East h&an Plain (NA50) to the north and the London Basin (NA66) to the south. The London Basin includes the surviving Epping Forest and small relics of thc eastern heaths, and also includes the areas of lighter soils around Colchester, which have a few relics of former heaths. The coastal edge is within the Greater Thames Estuary Natural Area (NA67). 13.3 Existing information Flora The coincidence maps of the lowland acid grassland species listed in Table 1 (Maps 2 to 4) show that there were concentrations of these species between Colchester and Chelmsford but that these have suffered considerable decline. In contrast, Epping Forest appears to have always been species-poor. There are two modem floras covering all or parts of the county (Jemyn, 1974 and Tarpey & Heath, 1990).