Neuroepigenetic Mechanisms in Disease Michael A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neuroepigenetic Mechanisms in Disease Michael A Christopher et al. Epigenetics & Chromatin (2017) 10:47 DOI 10.1186/s13072-017-0150-4 Epigenetics & Chromatin REVIEW Open Access Neuroepigenetic mechanisms in disease Michael A. Christopher1,2†, Stephanie M. Kyle1† and David J. Katz1* Abstract Epigenetics allows for the inheritance of information in cellular lineages during diferentiation, independent of changes to the underlying genetic sequence. This raises the question of whether epigenetic mechanisms also func- tion in post-mitotic neurons. During the long life of the neuron, fuctuations in gene expression allow the cell to pass through stages of diferentiation, modulate synaptic activity in response to environmental cues, and fortify the cell through age-related neuroprotective pathways. Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation and histone modifcation permit these dynamic changes in gene expression throughout the life of a neuron. Accordingly, recent studies have revealed the vital importance of epigenetic players in the central nervous system and during neurodegeneration. Here, we provide a review of several of these recent fndings, highlighting novel functions for epigenetics in the felds of Rett syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease research. Together, these discoveries underscore the vital importance of epigenetics in human neurological disorders. Keywords: Neuroepigenetics, DNA methylation, Histone modifcation, Rett syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, Alzheimer’s disease, MECP2, FMR1, LSD1/KDM1A Introduction to neuroepigenetics neurons, and how is it established and maintained? Are Advances in molecular biology and genomics have allowed there consequences for misregulation of these processes researchers to uncover roles for epigenetic regulation in a that manifest in human disease? If so, it will be important diversity of biological processes previously unexplained by to determine the contribution of epigenetic mechanisms to classical genetics. Tese epigenetic mechanisms manifest complex diseases such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) as a variety of chromatin modifcations and states, altering and neurodegenerative disorders, where identifcation of a gene function in a transient or persistent manner and act- purely genetic etiology has been elusive. In the frst part of ing as a vector for the passage of information. For example, this review, we introduce our current understanding of epi- considerable attention has been paid to the contributions of genetic modifcations, with an emphasis on what is known epigenetic aberrations during oncogenesis. In fact, epige- about them in post-mitotic neurons. In the second part of netic changes have been designated as one of the hallmarks this review, we highlight how disruption of these processes of cancer [1–3]. Oncogenic phenotypes can arise when an may contribute to three specifc examples of neurological insult or a mutation in an epigenetic pathway creates herit- disease. Importantly, this review is not intended as a com- able epigenetic information that is passaged through mito- prehensive summary of all that is known about neuroepi- sis. However, mature neurons no longer undergo mitosis genetics (for more information on neuroepigenetics, please and thus do not have an obligation to pass information see [4–6]. Rather, we hope that it will serve as an entry onto daughter cells. Tis makes the developed nervous point for researchers from multiple felds to begin to con- system an interesting system to study epigenetic regula- sider how post-mitotic neurons may have unique epige- tion. What epigenetic regulation is required in post-mitotic netic requirements, and how epigenetic mechanisms may contribute to neurological disease. *Correspondence: [email protected] †Michael A. Christopher and Stephanie M. Kyle contributed equally to this Epigenetic modifcations and their regulators work DNA methylation 1 Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 One level of chromatin modifcation is the methylation Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article of DNA at cytosine residues and, as recently discovered, © The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Christopher et al. Epigenetics & Chromatin (2017) 10:47 Page 2 of 18 on adenosine residues. Given the size and complexity of Fan and colleagues have provided further evidence that the vertebrate genome, methylated DNA adds a layer of mature neurons require active maintenance of DNA regulation that further refnes the cellular transcriptional methylation. Te researchers showed that when both profle. Cytosine methylation in mammals occurs pri- Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a are deleted in post-mitotic excita- marily in a CpG dinucleotide context in most cell types. tory neurons, mice display learning and memory defcits It has been most extensively studied in the context of without neuronal loss. Tis phenotype only occurred CpG islands: genomic regions containing a higher rate when both methyltransferases were deleted, suggesting of CpG dinucleotides than the rest of the genome [7, 8]. that the enzymes redundantly regulate neuronal pro- Tese regions are thought to be evolutionarily conserved cesses in adult excitatory neurons. Hippocampi from regulatory elements, as CpGs are underrepresented in double Dnmt1/3a mutant animals displayed abnormal the genome due to spontaneous deamination of methyl- long-term potentiation following stimulation, suggest- cytosine into thymine, resulting in a T/G mismatch. ing the learning defcits are due to neuronal plasticity If this mismatch is not detected as a mutation by the errors. Genes involved in immune response, cell com- DNA repair pathway, it results in a C/G to T/A transi- munication, and mRNA transcriptional regulation were tion mutation in the resulting daughter strand [9]. Tus, also aberrantly expressed in double mutant mice brains preservation of CpGs at CpG islands is thought to occur due to hypomethylation of their promoter regions. Tis via positive selection at evolutionarily conserved promot- study demonstrates that the DNA methyltransferases ers. Cytosine methylation at CpG dinucleotides in pro- play redundant roles in post-mitotic neurons by regulat- moters is correlated with repressed transcription, while ing gene expression associated with neuronal homeosta- cytosine methylation in gene bodies, as well as meth- sis, which afects higher-order functions like learning and ylation of adenosines, appears to be correlated with an memory. Fan and colleague’s fndings suggest that DNA active transcriptional state in many cells [10–14]. A nota- demethylation occurs at promotor regions in the absence ble exception to this trend occurs within neurons, where of Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a [25]. Tis was surprising, as it cytosine methylation within gene bodies is anticorrelated suggests a role for Dnmt1, a methyltransferase that typi- with transcription [15, 16]. Cytosine methylation occurs cally transmits DNA methylation to daughter cells, in the by the addition of a methyl group to the ffth position of maintenance of DNA methylation in non-dividing adult the cytosine base (5mC) and is donated by S-adenosyl- neurons [25]. methionine. Tis reaction is carried out by DNA meth- Recently, some DNA demethylation by-products have yltransferase (DNMT) enzymes. DNMT3a and DNMT3b been described as biologically functional, suggesting can methylate cytosines de novo [17]. DNMT1 recog- that DNA methylation and demethylation are dynamic nizes palindromic hemimethylated CpG dinucleotides processes. 5mC can be oxidized to form 5-hydroxym- and adds a methyl group to the unmethylated cytosine on ethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and 5-car- the opposite strand [18]. Trough the action of DNMT1, boxylcytosine (5caC) in sequential reactions carried out the maintenance methyltransferase, DNA methylation by the ten-eleven translocase (TET) family of enzymes can be inherited through DNA replication and cell divi- [26, 27]. Tis series of oxidation reactions is thought to sion, though it remains possible that DNMT1 has de be a mechanism of active demethylation, rather than one novo methyltransferase activity in certain contexts. of passive demethylation, which occurs through DNA However, this paradigm is challenged in the context of replication [28]. Te 5hmC mark is most highly enriched a post-mitotic neuron. Within the context of mature neu- in the brain when compared to any other tissue [29–31], rons, methylated CpG dinucleotides were once thought and TET1, which catalyzes the conversion of 5mC to to be very stable; however, DNA methylation is dynami- 5hmC, is activated by neuronal activity [19]. Current evi- cally regulated in the adult nervous system [19, 20]. Tis dence suggests that within the brain, 5hmC is acquired in mechanism is crucial in synaptic plasticity and memory a developmentally dependent manner, occurs exclusively formation [21, 22]. Specifcally, work from the Sweatt in the CpG context, and
Recommended publications
  • Microrna Function: Multiple Mechanisms for a Tiny RNA?
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW MicroRNA function: Multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RAMESH S. PILLAI Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4002 Basel, Switzerland ABSTRACT MicroRNAs are sequence-specific regulators of post-transcriptional gene expression in many eukaryotes. They are believed to control the expression of thousands of target mRNAs, with each mRNA believed to be targeted by multiple microRNAs. Recent studies have uncovered various mechanisms by which microRNAs down-regulate their target mRNAs and have linked a well- known subcellular structure, the cytoplasmic processing bodies (PBs) to the microRNA pathway. The finding that microRNAs are misexpressed in cancers has reinforced the idea that their regulatory roles are very important. Keywords: microRNAs; miRNPs; translational repression; P-bodies; Argonaute INTRODUCTION that the forced overexpression of miRNAs can lead to the development of tumors (He et al. 2005). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have come a long way from being Another pathway that uses small RNAs as sequence-spe- an oddity of worms when they were first discovered over 10 cific regulators is the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, years ago (Lee et al. 1993) to be recognized now as novel which is an evolutionarily conserved response to the pres- agents exercising post-transcriptional control over most ence of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the cell (Meister eukaryotic genomes. They are a family of 21–25-nucleotides and Tuschl 2004; Filipowicz 2005). The dsRNAs are cleaved (nt)-long RNAs expressed in a wide variety of organisms into 20-base pair (bp) duplexes of small-interfering RNAs ranging from plants to worms and humans.
    [Show full text]
  • 422.Full.Pdf
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Dioxin receptor and SLUG transcription factors regulate the insulator activity of B1 SINE retrotransposons via an RNA polymerase switch Angel Carlos Roma´n,1 Francisco J. Gonza´lez-Rico,1 Eduardo Molto´,2,3 Henar Hernando,4 Ana Neto,5 Cristina Vicente-Garcia,2,3 Esteban Ballestar,4 Jose´ L. Go´mez-Skarmeta,5 Jana Vavrova-Anderson,6 Robert J. White,6,7 Lluı´s Montoliu,2,3 and Pedro M. Ferna´ndez-Salguero1,8 1Departamento de Bioquı´mica y Biologı´a Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain; 2Centro Nacional de Biotecnologı´a (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas (CSIC), Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Campus de Cantoblanco, C/Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain; 3Centro de Investigacio´n Biome´dica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; 4Chromatin and Disease Group, Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Programme, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona 08907, Spain; 5Centro Andaluz de Biologı´a del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; 6College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom; 7Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom Complex genomes utilize insulators and boundary elements to help define spatial and temporal gene expression patterns. We report that a genome-wide B1 SINE (Short Interspersed Nuclear Element) retrotransposon (B1-X35S) has potent in- trinsic insulator activity in cultured cells and live animals. This insulation is mediated by binding of the transcription factors dioxin receptor (AHR) and SLUG (SNAI2) to consensus elements present in the SINE.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics of the Synapse in Neurodegeneration
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports (2019) 19:72 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0995-y GENETICS (V. BONIFATI, SECTION EDITOR) Epigenetics of the Synapse in Neurodegeneration Mary Xylaki1 & Benedict Atzler1 & Tiago Fleming Outeiro1,2,3 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review In the quest for understanding the pathophysiological processes underlying degeneration of nervous systems, synapses are emerging as sites of great interest as synaptic dysfunction is thought to play a role in the initiation and progression of neuronal loss. In particular, the synapse is an interesting target for the effects of epigenetic mechanisms in neurodegeneration. Here, we review the recent advances on epigenetic mechanisms driving synaptic compromise in major neurodegenerative disorders. Recent Findings Major developments in sequencing technologies enabled the mapping of transcriptomic patterns in human postmortem brain tissues in various neurodegenerative diseases, and also in cell and animal models. These studies helped identify changes in classical neurodegeneration pathways and discover novel targets related to synaptic degeneration. Summary Identifying epigenetic patterns indicative of synaptic defects prior to neuronal degeneration may provide the basis for future breakthroughs in the field of neurodegeneration. Keywords Synapse . Neurodegenerative diseases . DNA methylation . Histone modifications . Noncoding RNAs . Neuroepigenetics Abbreviations CpG Cytosine-phosphate-guanine 3xTg-AD Triple-transgenic AD CpH Non-CpG 5xFAD Five familial
    [Show full text]
  • Activating Transcription Factor 6 Derepression Mediates Neuroprotection in Huntington Disease
    Activating transcription factor 6 derepression mediates neuroprotection in Huntington disease José R. Naranjo, … , Jia-Yi Li, Britt Mellström J Clin Invest. 2016;126(2):627-638. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI82670. Research Article Neuroscience Deregulated protein and Ca2+ homeostasis underlie synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration in Huntington disease (HD); however, the factors that disrupt homeostasis are not fully understood. Here, we determined that expression of downstream regulatory element antagonist modulator (DREAM), a multifunctional Ca2+-binding protein, is reduced in murine in vivo and in vitro HD models and in HD patients. DREAM downregulation was observed early after birth and was associated with endogenous neuroprotection. In the R6/2 mouse HD model, induced DREAM haplodeficiency or blockade of DREAM activity by chronic administration of the drug repaglinide delayed onset of motor dysfunction, reduced striatal atrophy, and prolonged life span. DREAM-related neuroprotection was linked to an interaction between DREAM and the unfolded protein response (UPR) sensor activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Repaglinide blocked this interaction and enhanced ATF6 processing and nuclear accumulation of transcriptionally active ATF6, improving prosurvival UPR function in striatal neurons. Together, our results identify a role for DREAM silencing in the activation of ATF6 signaling, which promotes early neuroprotection in HD. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/82670/pdf The Journal of Clinical Investigation RESEARCH ARTICLE Activating transcription factor 6 derepression mediates neuroprotection in Huntington disease José R. Naranjo,1,2 Hongyu Zhang,3 Diego Villar,1,2 Paz González,1,2 Xose M. Dopazo,1,2 Javier Morón-Oset,1,2 Elena Higueras,1,2 Juan C.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroepigenetics: Introduction to the Special Issue on Epigenetics in Neurodevelopment and Neurological Diseases
    Experimental Neurology 268 (2015) 1–2 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Experimental Neurology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yexnr Editorial Neuroepigenetics: Introduction to the special issue on epigenetics in neurodevelopment and neurological diseases Gene expression profile represents the molecular state of a cell at a The structural unit of the chromatin is nucleosome, which is com- given time and is dynamically regulated and precisely controlled in re- prised of DNA chains wrapping around histone proteins. Nucleosomes sponse to external stimuli. While the DNA sequences are the ultimate can be either loosely or densely packed, which is associated with active templates for gene transcription, epigenetic features of the genome, in- or suppressed gene transcription, respectively. The chemical modifica- cluding modifications of histones, methylation of cytosine nucleotides tions of the histone tail, most commonly acetylation, methylation and of the genomic DNA, 3-dimensional interaction of genomic regions, phosphorylation, are one of the determinants of the structural status and the expression of various forms of non-coding RNAs, regulate the of the chromatin. Histone acetylation is in general correlates with accessibility and processability of the genomic loci and add another loose chromatin and active gene expression. On the other hand, layer of regulation of gene expression beyond the heritable DNA se- Histone-3 lysine-4 trimethylation (H3K4Me3) plays both positive and quences. For decades, some epigenetic properties of the genome, such negative roles in regulating gene expression, depending on the combi- as DNA methylation, have been considered as stable and inheritable nation of other histone modifications. The article by Shen and col- marks.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMB713: Neuroepigenetics
    CAMB713: Neuroepigenetics TIME: Thursdays 1-3pm 8/29 – 12/12 (organizational meeting 8/29, no class on 9/5 and 11/28) LOCATION: BRB 1413 COURSE DIRECTORS: Zhaolan (Joe) Zhou 215.746.5025 [email protected] Elizabeth Heller 215.573.7038 [email protected] Hao Wu 215.573.9360 [email protected] GOALS: This is a course intended to bring students up to date concerning our understanding of Neural Epigenetics. It is based on assigned topics and readings covering a variety of experimental systems and concepts in the field of Neuroepigenetics, formal presentations by individual students, critical evaluation of primary data, and in-depth discussion of potential issues and future directions, with goals to: 1) Review basic concepts of epigenetics in the context of neuroscience 2) Learn to critically evaluate a topic (not a single paper) and rigor of prior research 3) Improve experimental design and enhance rigor and reproducibility 4) Catch up with the most recent development in neuroepigenetics 5) Develop professional presentation skills - be a story teller FORMAT: Each week will focus on a specific topic of Neuroepigenetics via a “seminar” style presentation by a class member with the following expectations: Consultation with preceptor prior to presentation Introduction (~20 min): Context of topic in the field Historic perspectives of the topic Current understandings Primary data (~40 min): Questions of interest Design of experiments Interpretation of data Discussion (~20 min): Issues/challenges Proposed future
    [Show full text]
  • An HMG I/Y-Containing Repressor Complex and Supercolled DNA Topology Are Critical for Long-Range Enhancer-Dependent Transcription in Vitro
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press An HMG I/Y-containing repressor complex and supercolled DNA topology are critical for long-range enhancer-dependent transcription in vitro Rajesh Bagga and Beverly M. Emerson 1 Regulatory Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037 USA The 3' enhancer of the T cell receptor s.chain (TCR~) gene directs the tissue- and stage-specific expression and V(D)Jrecombination of this gene locus. Using an in vitro system that reproduces TCRoL enhancer activity efficiently, we show that long-range promoter-enhancer regulation requires a T cell-specific repressor complex and is sensitive to DNA topology. In this system, the enhancer functions to derepress the promoter on supercoiled, but not relaxed, templates. We find that the TCRoL promoter is inactivated by a repressor complex that contains the architectural protein HMG I/Y. In the absence of this repressor complex, expression of the TCR~ gene is completely independent of the 3' enhancer and DNA topology. The interaction of the T cell-restricted protein LEF-1 with the TCR~ enhancer is required for promoter derepression. In this system, the TCR~ enhancer increases the number of active promoters rather than the rate of transcription. Thus, long-range enhancers function in a distinct manner from promoters and provide the regulatory link between repressors, DNA topology, and gene activity. [Key Words: TCR genes; transcription; enhancers; HMG I/Y; derepression; DNA topology] Received December 27, 1996; revised version accepted January 14, 1997. The widespread importance of long-range promoter- Giaever 1988; Rippe et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Insulators Targets Pcg Proteins to a Downstream Promoter
    Developmental Cell 11, 117–124, July, 2006 ª2006 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.009 PRE-Mediated Bypass of Two Short Article Su(Hw) Insulators Targets PcG Proteins to a Downstream Promoter Itys Comet,1 Ekaterina Savitskaya,2,3 dependent on the chromatin surrounding the transgene Bernd Schuettengruber,1 Nicolas Ne`gre,1,4 (barrier activity). Second, when an insulator is placed Sergey Lavrov,1,5 Aleksander Parshikov,2 between an enhancer and a promoter, it can prevent Franc¸ois Juge,1,6 Elena Gracheva,2,7 the enhancer from activating the promoter (enhancer Pavel Georgiev,2,* and Giacomo Cavalli1,* blocking activity). 1 Institute of Human Genetics The Drosophila Su(Hw) insulator, from the gypsy retro- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique transposon, contains 12 binding sites for the Su(Hw) 141 rue de la Cardonille protein and can block enhancer-promoter interactions F-34396 Montpellier Cedex 5 in a Su(Hw)-dependent manner when inserted between France them (Cai and Levine, 1995; Geyer and Corces, 1992; 2 Department of the Control of Genetic Processes Scott et al., 1999). On the other hand, two intervening Institute of Gene Biology Su(Hw) insulators restore enhancer access to down- Russian Academy of Sciences stream promoters (Cai and Shen, 2001; Muravyova Moscow 119334 et al., 2001). This ability, which is shared by other insula- Russia tor elements (Gruzdeva et al., 2005; Melnikova et al., 2004), was suggested to depend on pairing of the two in- sulators that might bring the upstream enhancer in the Summary vicinity of the downstream promoter.
    [Show full text]
  • Derepression of Human Embryonic -Globin Promoter by a Locus-Control
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 14669–14674, December 1998 Biochemistry Derepression of human embryonic z-globin promoter by a locus-control region sequence (transgenic miceyenhancerypassive repressionycompetitive factor bindingyglobin switch) B.-L. HUANG*†,I.R.FAN-CHIANG*†,S.C.WEN*, H.-C. KOO*, W. Y. KAO*, N. R. GAVVA‡, AND C.-K. JAMES SHEN*‡§ *Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Republic of China; and ‡Section of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Communicated by James C. Wang, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, September 28, 1998 (received for review August 12, 1998) ABSTRACT A multiple protein–DNA complex formed at consist of six nuclear factor-binding motifs (10) that are a human a-globin locus-specific regulatory element, HS-40, occupied in vivo in an erythroid lineage-specific and develop- confers appropriate developmental expression pattern on mental stage-specific manner (11, 12). These include three human embryonic z-globin promoter activity in humans and GATA-1 motifs (b, c, and d), two NF-E2yAP1 motifs (59 and transgenic mice. We show here that introduction of a 1-bp 39), and a GT motif (Fig. 1A). In vitro binding studies indicated y mutation in an NF-E2 AP1 sequence motif converts HS-40 that the GT motif predominately binds the ubiquitous Sp1 into an erythroid-specific locus-control region. Cis-linkage factor (13). The GATA-1 motifs bind the GATA family of with this locus-control region, in contrast to the wild-type transcription factors, including the erythroid-enriched HS-40, allows erythroid lineage-specific derepression of the y z GATA-1 (14).
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Neuroepigenetics to Huntington's Disease
    Francelle L, Lotz C, Outeiro T, Brouillet E, Merienne K. Contribution of Neuroepigenetics to Huntington’s Disease. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2017, 11, 17. Copyright: © 2017 Francelle, Lotz, Outeiro, Brouillet and Merienne. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. DOI link to article: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00017 Date deposited: 19/12/2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk fnhum-11-00017 January 25, 2017 Time: 15:35 # 1 REVIEW published: 30 January 2017 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00017 Contribution of Neuroepigenetics to Huntington’s Disease Laetitia Francelle1*, Caroline Lotz2, Tiago Outeiro1, Emmanuel Brouillet3 and Karine Merienne2 1 Department of NeuroDegeneration and Restorative Research, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany, 2 CNRS UMR 7364, Laboratory of Cognitive and Adaptive Neurosciences, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, 3 Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Département de Recherche Fondamentale, Institut d’Imagerie Biomédicale, Molecular Imaging Center, Neurodegenerative diseases Laboratory, UMR 9199, CNRS Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France Unbalanced epigenetic regulation is thought to contribute to the progression of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington’s disease (HD), a genetic disorder considered as a paradigm of epigenetic dysregulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods in Brief
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS METHODS IN BRIEF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY T argeting deubiquitinating enzymes Ubiquitin (Ub) is conjugated to proteins via an E1→E2→E3 enzyme cascade, a process reversed by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs). There are 58 known human Ub-specific proteases (USPs), representing half of the known DUBs. Ernst et al. report a strategy for developing highly potent, specific inhibitors of USPs, which can also be expanded to other DUBs and E2 and E3 enzymes. All USPs share a common ubiquitin-binding fold, but because Ub binds to USPs with low affinity and a large binding area, the researchers reasoned that they could make Ub mutants with enhanced affinity for specific USPs. Using a phage-display selection strategy, they identified Ub variants that served as specific inhibitors of four USPs, which they confirmed by crystallography. This strategy will allow the development of a useful suite of tools to study the Ub system in greater detail. Ernst, A. et al. Science 339, 590–595 (2013). STEM CELLS Reprogramming by derepression There are now several reports of methods to convert non-neuronal cells, such as fibroblasts, into neurons. Such methods typically involve the ectopic expression of combinations of transcription factors, with or without small molecules. MicroRNAs are known to play a role as well. Xue et al. now report a new twist in this tale: the researchers showed that reducing levels of the polypyrimidine tract–binding (PTB) protein, a process that occurs during brain development, can also do the job. Knockdown of PTB with short hairpin RNA converts mouse embryonic fibroblasts and neural progenitor cells to functional neurons and can also differentiate and transdifferentiate human cells to neuron-like cells.
    [Show full text]
  • About Microneurotrophins
    About MicroNeurotrophins UNLOCKING THE PROMISE OF NEUROTROPHINS Most researchers now agree that ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases including Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s are remarkably complex, almost certainly involving a combination of different biological, genetic and external triggers. Yet, time and again, drug development for these multi-faceted diseases has focused almost exclusively on medications that only target one factor likely causing the disease. It’s not surprising that these single-target drugs have uniformly failed in previous clinical trials. With this in mind, esteemed pharmacologist Dr. Achilleas Gravanis and his team of scientists from Bionature, a spin-off of the University of Crete in Greece, began searching for a way to effectively address the multiple triggers contributing to the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Their investigation led them to study neurotrophins, proteins naturally secreted in the brain that transmit signals between motor neurons by binding to and activating two different types of receptors, TrkA and p75, found on the surface of nerve cells. Twenty years of research have shown that neurotrophins help motor neurons develop, grow, function, signal and even repair themselves. Neurotrophins also appear to protect motor neurons from stress and death. By contrast, ALS causes motor neurons to degenerate and die and ALS patients experience a profound loss of neurotrophins as the disease progresses. However, numerous clinical trials have been unable to prove the efficacy of neurotrophins to treat ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases. TWO STARTLING DISCOVERIES To understand why, Dr. Gravanis and his colleagues carefully examined past studies on neurotrophins, and two astonishing observations became apparent to them.
    [Show full text]