DOCSLIB.ORG

An HMG I/Y-Containing Repressor Complex and Supercolled DNA Topology Are Critical for Long-Range Enhancer-Dependent Transcription in Vitro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An HMG I/Y-Containing Repressor Complex and Supercolled DNA Topology Are Critical for Long-Range Enhancer-Dependent Transcription in Vitro Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press An HMG I/Y-containing repressor complex and supercolled DNA topology are critical for long-range enhancer-dependent transcription in vitro Rajesh Bagga and Beverly M. Emerson 1 Regulatory Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037 USA The 3' enhancer of the T cell receptor s.chain (TCR~) gene directs the tissue- and stage-specific expression and V(D)Jrecombination of this gene locus. Using an in vitro system that reproduces TCRoL enhancer activity efficiently, we show that long-range promoter-enhancer regulation requires a T cell-specific repressor complex and is sensitive to DNA topology. In this system, the enhancer functions to derepress the promoter on supercoiled, but not relaxed, templates. We find that the TCRoL promoter is inactivated by a repressor complex that contains the architectural protein HMG I/Y. In the absence of this repressor complex, expression of the TCR~ gene is completely independent of the 3' enhancer and DNA topology. The interaction of the T cell-restricted protein LEF-1 with the TCR~ enhancer is required for promoter derepression. In this system, the TCR~ enhancer increases the number of active promoters rather than the rate of transcription. Thus, long-range enhancers function in a distinct manner from promoters and provide the regulatory link between repressors, DNA topology, and gene activity. [Key Words: TCR genes; transcription; enhancers; HMG I/Y; derepression; DNA topology] Received December 27, 1996; revised version accepted January 14, 1997. The widespread importance of long-range promoter- Giaever 1988; Rippe et al. 1995). Evidence supporting enhancer interactions in tissue-specific and developmen- each model has been demonstrated in different systems. tally regulated gene expression has been documented In terms of DNA topology, the critical role of DNA ar- extensively. Some well-known examples include the im- chitectural proteins, such as high mobility group I/Y munoglobulin, f~-globin, insulin, B-interferon, ~-feto- (HMG I/Y) and integration host factor (IHF) among oth- protein, ovalbumin, and T-cell receptor genes, as well as ers, in the regulation of transcription and recombination the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase Adh, fushi through the formation of higher-order protein-DNA tarazu, and ecdysone-regulated glue genes (for review, complexes is particularly germane (for review, see Bustin see Wasylyk 1988). These studies have yielded a wealth and Reeves 1996). For example, HMG I/Y is required to of information about enhancer-dependent transcription, generate a multicomponent complex within the inter- but they have not provided mechanistic data to explain feron-~ promoter in response to viral infection for maxi- how these control elements actually work. For example, mal synergistic activation of the gene, presumably by it is currently unknown how a gene must be packaged in changing the local DNA structure (Falvo et al. 1995). the nucleus for natural enhancers to function. In this Alterations in global DNA topology can substantially regard, the requirement for chromatin structure to gen- affect the requirements of a gene for general transcrip- erate long-range transcriptional regulation has been tion initiation factors (Parvin and Sharp 1993). Another demonstrated in vitro using reconstituted DNA tem- compelling question is whether enhancers regulate pro- plates (Laybourn and Kadonaga 1992; Barton and Emer- moters by activation or derepression. The prevailing son 1994). It also remains to be determined how promot- view is that enhancers function by increasing the local ers communicate with distal enhancers. Several models concentration of transcriptional activators in the vicin- have been proposed: DNA looping by the association of ity of the promoter through DNA looping rather than by proteins bound at distal sites, DNA tracking by protein operating in an entirely distinct manner from upstream translocation, and long-range interactions affected by promoter elements. However, evidence exists showing DNA topology (for review, see Ptashne 1986; Wang and that the primary role of enhancers injected into mouse preimplantation embryos is to relieve promoter repres- 1Corresponding author. sion (Majumder et al. 1993). Thus, open questions re- E-MAIL [email protected]; FAX (619) 535-8194. main concerning the nuclear structure required to gen- GENES & DEVELOPMENT 11:629-639 © 1997 by Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress ISSN 0890°9369/97 $5.00 629 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Bagga and Emerson erate an enhancer-responsive gene including the role of hancer and DNA topology. Thus, enhancers function architectural proteins, the nature of promoter-enhancer with a specialized class of repressor proteins to regulate communication (looping, tracking, topology, or a combi- promoter activity on the basis of DNA topology and an nation thereof), and the functional consequences of this architectural factor, HMG I/Y, is a critical component of long-range interaction (activation or derepression). the repressor complex. One well-characterized system in which to examine these issues is the tissue-specific T-cell receptor o~-chain (TCRe~) gene. This gene undergoes V(D)J recombinase- Results mediated rearrangement at a discrete stage of T-cell de- velopment in a process that requires the TCR~ enhancer Distal enhancer-dependent RNA polymerase II (Strominger 1989; Capone et al. 1993). Once produc- transcription in vitro tively rearranged, the TCRc~ gene is regulated tissue spe- Previously, we have shown that in vitro transcription of cifically by the 3' ~ enhancer from distances 450 kb. The cosmids containing the chick f~-globin gene within its minimal enhancer consists of 116 bp that interacts with 40-kb chromosomal locus is dependent on the action of four proteins, cAMP response element binding/activat- an erythroid-specific enhancer residing 2 kb 3' of the ing transcription factor (CREB/ATF), lymphoid en- promoter. In this system, the DNA was incorporated hancer-binding factor 1 (LEF- 1), polyoma enhancer bind- into synthetic nuclei using Xenopus egg extracts in the ing protein (PEBP2c~), and E twenty-six transforming presence of stage-specific erythroid proteins. This re- virus protein-1 (Ets-1 ), and functions in a context-depen- sulted in the assembly of DNA into chromatin and sub- dent manner (for review, see Leiden 1993). The lym- sequent encapsulation by a nuclear membrane (Barton phoid-restricted factor LEF-1 contains an HMG-binding and Emerson 1994). Because a variety of cloned genes as domain (Waterman et al. 1991) and has been shown to naked DNA do not normally display distal enhancer- act as an architectural factor by its ability to induce a dependent expression under standard in vitro transcrip- sharp bend in the enhancer that brings the other adja- tion conditions, our results and those of others (Lay- cently bound proteins into close juxtaposition to pro- bourn and Kadonaga 1992; Schild et al. 1993) suggested duce a functional complex (Giese et al. 1992, 1995). How that a nucleosomal structure is required. We were inter- the protein-enhancer complex then regulates its cognate ested in characterizing the nature of this structure and V~ promoter at a distance is unknown. To examine the how complex it had to be to reproduce tissue-specific mechanistic processes involved in these long-range in- enhancer function at a distance. As a first step, we de- teractions, we have developed an in vitro system that vised conditions in which cloned mouse TCRe~-chain re- reproduces accurately distal enhancer-dependent tran- porter genes are transcribed in a distal enhancer-depen- scriptional regulation of cloned TCR~ genes using pro- dent manner in a soluble in vitro transcription system tein extracts from oL/~-expressing Jurkat T cells. without the need for a separate nucleosome assembly Here we show that long-range promoter-enhancer step. This system is derived from human Jurkat T cells communication does not require a separate chromatin that normally express the endogenous TCRoL/f3 genes. assembly step but is strongly dependent on DNA topol- The TCRc~ DNA template used in these studies, ogy. TCR~ genes must exist in a supercoiled topology to pTCR1700TCRen, contains the mouse V~ 11.1 promoter be transcribed efficiently in the presence of the 3' en- region from -1600, a 2.5-kb chloramphenicol acetyl- hancer. When the gene is relaxed, transcription is abol- transferase (CAT) reporter gene, and 237 bp of 3'-flank- ished by the enhancer. However, if the enhancer is de- ing sequences including the minimal TCRoL enhancer. leted, the relaxed genes are highly expressed. This indi- The 3' enhancer deletion pTCR1700 was derived from cates that a critical aspect of enhancer function is to the parental plasmid pTCR1700TCRen. These templates regulate promoter activity by sensing changes in levels have been characterized extensively by transfection of template superhelicity to insure that genes are active studies in other laboratories and V~ 11.1 promoter activ- when supercoiled and inactive when relaxed. In this sys- ity was shown to be completely enhancer dependent in tem, TCR~ enhancer-mediated gene regulation requires vivo (Winoto and Baltimore 1989; Kingsley and Winoto the action of a repressor complex that binds to topology- 1992). The 23 7-bp TCR~ enhancer binds to five proteins: dependent DNA structures. This complex is composed the ubiquitous CREB/ATF and tissue-restricted LEF-1, of T-cell factors and the architectural protein HMG I/Y, Ets-1, PEBP2~, and GATA-3, which together are essen- which is required to generate an enhancer-responsive tial for its T-cell-specific activity. Very little information DNA topology. The enhancer functions by derepression is available concerning the V~ 11.1 promoter except that of the supercoiled V~ promoter in a process that may it does not contain a TATA motif and is regulated posi- involve modulating DNA structure to regulate the bind- tively by members of the Spl family, including Sp2 and ing affinity of the HMG I/Y-repressor complex.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microrna Function: Multiple Mechanisms for a Tiny RNA?
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW MicroRNA function: Multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RAMESH S. PILLAI Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4002 Basel, Switzerland ABSTRACT MicroRNAs are sequence-specific regulators of post-transcriptional gene expression in many eukaryotes. They are believed to control the expression of thousands of target mRNAs, with each mRNA believed to be targeted by multiple microRNAs. Recent studies have uncovered various mechanisms by which microRNAs down-regulate their target mRNAs and have linked a well- known subcellular structure, the cytoplasmic processing bodies (PBs) to the microRNA pathway. The finding that microRNAs are misexpressed in cancers has reinforced the idea that their regulatory roles are very important. Keywords: microRNAs; miRNPs; translational repression; P-bodies; Argonaute INTRODUCTION that the forced overexpression of miRNAs can lead to the development of tumors (He et al. 2005). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have come a long way from being Another pathway that uses small RNAs as sequence-spe- an oddity of worms when they were first discovered over 10 cific regulators is the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, years ago (Lee et al. 1993) to be recognized now as novel which is an evolutionarily conserved response to the pres- agents exercising post-transcriptional control over most ence of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the cell (Meister eukaryotic genomes. They are a family of 21–25-nucleotides and Tuschl 2004; Filipowicz 2005). The dsRNAs are cleaved (nt)-long RNAs expressed in a wide variety of organisms into 20-base pair (bp) duplexes of small-interfering RNAs ranging from plants to worms and humans.
    [Show full text]
  • 422.Full.Pdf
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Dioxin receptor and SLUG transcription factors regulate the insulator activity of B1 SINE retrotransposons via an RNA polymerase switch Angel Carlos Roma´n,1 Francisco J. Gonza´lez-Rico,1 Eduardo Molto´,2,3 Henar Hernando,4 Ana Neto,5 Cristina Vicente-Garcia,2,3 Esteban Ballestar,4 Jose´ L. Go´mez-Skarmeta,5 Jana Vavrova-Anderson,6 Robert J. White,6,7 Lluı´s Montoliu,2,3 and Pedro M. Ferna´ndez-Salguero1,8 1Departamento de Bioquı´mica y Biologı´a Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain; 2Centro Nacional de Biotecnologı´a (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas (CSIC), Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Campus de Cantoblanco, C/Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain; 3Centro de Investigacio´n Biome´dica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; 4Chromatin and Disease Group, Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Programme, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona 08907, Spain; 5Centro Andaluz de Biologı´a del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; 6College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom; 7Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom Complex genomes utilize insulators and boundary elements to help define spatial and temporal gene expression patterns. We report that a genome-wide B1 SINE (Short Interspersed Nuclear Element) retrotransposon (B1-X35S) has potent in- trinsic insulator activity in cultured cells and live animals. This insulation is mediated by binding of the transcription factors dioxin receptor (AHR) and SLUG (SNAI2) to consensus elements present in the SINE.
    [Show full text]
  • Activating Transcription Factor 6 Derepression Mediates Neuroprotection in Huntington Disease
    Activating transcription factor 6 derepression mediates neuroprotection in Huntington disease José R. Naranjo, … , Jia-Yi Li, Britt Mellström J Clin Invest. 2016;126(2):627-638. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI82670. Research Article Neuroscience Deregulated protein and Ca2+ homeostasis underlie synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration in Huntington disease (HD); however, the factors that disrupt homeostasis are not fully understood. Here, we determined that expression of downstream regulatory element antagonist modulator (DREAM), a multifunctional Ca2+-binding protein, is reduced in murine in vivo and in vitro HD models and in HD patients. DREAM downregulation was observed early after birth and was associated with endogenous neuroprotection. In the R6/2 mouse HD model, induced DREAM haplodeficiency or blockade of DREAM activity by chronic administration of the drug repaglinide delayed onset of motor dysfunction, reduced striatal atrophy, and prolonged life span. DREAM-related neuroprotection was linked to an interaction between DREAM and the unfolded protein response (UPR) sensor activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Repaglinide blocked this interaction and enhanced ATF6 processing and nuclear accumulation of transcriptionally active ATF6, improving prosurvival UPR function in striatal neurons. Together, our results identify a role for DREAM silencing in the activation of ATF6 signaling, which promotes early neuroprotection in HD. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/82670/pdf The Journal of Clinical Investigation RESEARCH ARTICLE Activating transcription factor 6 derepression mediates neuroprotection in Huntington disease José R. Naranjo,1,2 Hongyu Zhang,3 Diego Villar,1,2 Paz González,1,2 Xose M. Dopazo,1,2 Javier Morón-Oset,1,2 Elena Higueras,1,2 Juan C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yin and Yang of Enhancer–Promoter Interactions
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology | Published online 20 Dec 2017; doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.136 GENE EXPRESSION in the promoters of two genes resulted in reduced YY1 binding, reduced contact frequency between the pro- The yin and yang of enhancer– moters and their cognate enhancers and, in one of the genes, reduced expression. The lack of reduced promoter interactions expression of one of the genes was probably due to YY1 binding at Transcription factors can facilitate the could bind to these elements and facil- other, less optimal motifs; indeed, physical interaction between enhanc- itate their interaction. They identified YY1 depletion resulted in decreased ers and promoters and looping of deletion of another zinc finger protein, YY1, expression of both genes. the intervening DNA between them. YY1 binding which, like CTCF, is essential for cell Next, using an inducible protein Such loops are formed within larger, viability and is ubiquitously expressed. degradation system, the genome-wide insulated chromosomal loops (also motifs… Importantly, co- immunoprecipitation effects of YY1 depletion were meas- known as topologically associating reduced of differentially tagged YY1 proteins ured. The expression of thousands domains (TADs)), which are formed contact confirmed that YY1 can form of genes was changed (increased or by dimerization of the zinc finger frequency homodimers. decreased), and in general the genes protein CTCF bound to chromatin. In various mouse and human cell with the greatest changes following Weintraub et al. now show that, anal- between the types, YY1 occupied enhancers and YY1 depletion were those with ogously to CTCF, the protein yin and promoters and promoters genome-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • A Curated Benchmark of Enhancer-Gene Interactions for Evaluating Enhancer-Target Gene Prediction Methods
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS Open Access Articles Open Access Publications by UMMS Authors 2020-01-22 A curated benchmark of enhancer-gene interactions for evaluating enhancer-target gene prediction methods Jill E. Moore University of Massachusetts Medical School Et al. Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Computational Biology Commons, Genetic Phenomena Commons, and the Genomics Commons Repository Citation Moore JE, Pratt HE, Purcaro MJ, Weng Z. (2020). A curated benchmark of enhancer-gene interactions for evaluating enhancer-target gene prediction methods. Open Access Articles. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13059-019-1924-8. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/4118 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Articles by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Moore et al. Genome Biology (2020) 21:17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1924-8 RESEARCH Open Access A curated benchmark of enhancer-gene interactions for evaluating enhancer-target gene prediction methods Jill E. Moore, Henry E. Pratt, Michael J. Purcaro and Zhiping Weng* Abstract Background: Many genome-wide collections of candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) have been defined using genomic and epigenomic data, but it remains a major challenge to connect these elements to their target genes. Results: To facilitate the development of computational methods for predicting target genes, we develop a Benchmark of candidate Enhancer-Gene Interactions (BENGI) by integrating the recently developed Registry of cCREs with experimentally derived genomic interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoter Methylation Status for Cell-Type Deconvolution
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.428654; this version posted January 29, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Long Reads Capture Simultaneous Enhancer- Promoter Methylation Status for Cell-type Deconvolution Sapir Margalit1,2, Yotam Abramson1,2, Hila Sharim1,2, Zohar Manber2,3, Surajit Bhattacharya4, Yi-Wen Chen4,5, Eric Vilain4,5, Hayk Barseghyan4,5, Ran Elkon2,3, Roded Sharan2,6* and Yuval Ebenstein1,2* 1Department of physical chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel., 2Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel., 3Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel., 4Center for Genetic Medicine Research, Children’s National Hospital, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington DC 20010, USA., 5Department of Genomics and Precision Medicine, George Washington University 1918 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20052, USA., 6School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel.*Corresponding Author Abstract Motivation: While promoter methylation is associated with reinforcing fundamental tissue identities, the methylation status of distant enhancers was shown by genome-wide association studies to be a powerful determinant of cell-state and cancer. With recent availability of long-reads that report on the methylation status of enhancer-promoter pairs on the same molecule, we hypothesized that probing these pairs on the single-molecule level may serve the basis for detection of rare cancerous transformations in a given cell population. We explore various analysis approaches for deconvolving cell-type mixtures based on their genome-wide enhancer-promoter methylation profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Insulators Targets Pcg Proteins to a Downstream Promoter
    Developmental Cell 11, 117–124, July, 2006 ª2006 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.009 PRE-Mediated Bypass of Two Short Article Su(Hw) Insulators Targets PcG Proteins to a Downstream Promoter Itys Comet,1 Ekaterina Savitskaya,2,3 dependent on the chromatin surrounding the transgene Bernd Schuettengruber,1 Nicolas Ne`gre,1,4 (barrier activity). Second, when an insulator is placed Sergey Lavrov,1,5 Aleksander Parshikov,2 between an enhancer and a promoter, it can prevent Franc¸ois Juge,1,6 Elena Gracheva,2,7 the enhancer from activating the promoter (enhancer Pavel Georgiev,2,* and Giacomo Cavalli1,* blocking activity). 1 Institute of Human Genetics The Drosophila Su(Hw) insulator, from the gypsy retro- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique transposon, contains 12 binding sites for the Su(Hw) 141 rue de la Cardonille protein and can block enhancer-promoter interactions F-34396 Montpellier Cedex 5 in a Su(Hw)-dependent manner when inserted between France them (Cai and Levine, 1995; Geyer and Corces, 1992; 2 Department of the Control of Genetic Processes Scott et al., 1999). On the other hand, two intervening Institute of Gene Biology Su(Hw) insulators restore enhancer access to down- Russian Academy of Sciences stream promoters (Cai and Shen, 2001; Muravyova Moscow 119334 et al., 2001). This ability, which is shared by other insula- Russia tor elements (Gruzdeva et al., 2005; Melnikova et al., 2004), was suggested to depend on pairing of the two in- sulators that might bring the upstream enhancer in the Summary vicinity of the downstream promoter.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers
    cells Review Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers 1,2, 1, 1,3, Airat N. Ibragimov y, Oleg V. Bylino y and Yulii V. Shidlovskii * 1 Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (A.N.I.); [email protected] (O.V.B.) 2 Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia 3 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8, bldg. 2 Trubetskaya St., 119048 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-4991354096 These authors contributed equally to this study. y Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 3 July 2020; Published: 5 July 2020 Abstract: Transcriptional enhancers are major genomic elements that control gene activity in eukaryotes. Recent studies provided deeper insight into the temporal and spatial organization of transcription in the nucleus, the role of non-coding RNAs in the process, and the epigenetic control of gene expression. Thus, multiple molecular details of enhancer functioning were revealed. Here, we describe the recent data and models of molecular organization of enhancer-driven transcription. Keywords: enhancer; promoter; chromatin; transcriptional bursting; transcription factories; enhancer RNA; epigenetic marks 1. Introduction Gene transcription is precisely organized in time and space. The process requires the participation of hundreds of molecules, which form an extensive interaction network. Substantial progress was achieved recently in our understanding of the molecular processes that take place in the cell nucleus (e.g., see [1–9]).
    [Show full text]
  • Structure, Function, and Evolution of a Signal-Regulated Enhancer
    Structure, Function, and Evolution of a Signal-Regulated Enhancer by Christina Ione Swanson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Cell and Developmental Biology) in the University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor Scott E. Barolo, Chair Professor J. Douglas Engel Associate Professor Kenneth M. Cadigan Associate Professor Billy Tsai Assistant Professor Patricia J. Wittkopp To my family, for your truly unconditional love and support. And to Mike - the best thing that happened to me in grad school. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION .................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ v CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 What do enhancers look like? ................................................................................ 2 Mechanisms of enhancer function ......................................................................... 3 Enhancer structure and organization ...................................................................... 6 Unanswered questions in the field ....................................................................... 10 The D-Pax2 sparkling enhancer .......................................................................... 12 CHAPTER II: STRUCTURAL RULES
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancer Rnas Are an Important Regulatory Layer of the Epigenome
    REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-020-0446-0 Enhancer RNAs are an important regulatory layer of the epigenome Vittorio Sartorelli 1 and Shannon M. Lauberth 2 ✉ Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) direct a remarkable number of diverse functions in development and disease through their regula- tion of transcription, RNA processing and translation. Leading the charge in the RNA revolution is a class of ncRNAs that are synthesized at active enhancers, called enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). Here, we review recent insights into the biogenesis of eRNAs and the mechanisms underlying their multifaceted functions and consider how these findings could inform future investigations into enhancer transcription and eRNA function. he explosion of high-throughput sequencing data has Many different models for how enhancers function in gene con- revealed the complexity and diversity of the transcriptome. trol have been proposed since their initial discovery nearly four TThese data have also unexpectedly revealed that only 1–2% decades ago19–21. Specifically, there is considerable evidence demon- of the transcriptome provides instructions for the synthesis of strating that looping of distal enhancers to their target promoters is functional proteins, while the remaining 98–99% gives rise to a required for enhancer function (reviewed in ref. 22). For example, plethora of ncRNAs, including transfer RNAs (tRNAs), ribosomal a key study revealed that experimental induction of chromatin RNAs (rRNAs), intronic RNAs, small nuclear (sn)RNAs, small looping between the mouse β-globin (Hbb) promoter and its asso- nucleolar (sno)RNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding ciated enhancer region results in transcriptional activation of the RNAs (lncRNAs). A recent addition to the expanding list of regu- Hbb gene23.
    [Show full text]
  • Derepression of Human Embryonic -Globin Promoter by a Locus-Control
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 14669–14674, December 1998 Biochemistry Derepression of human embryonic z-globin promoter by a locus-control region sequence (transgenic miceyenhancerypassive repressionycompetitive factor bindingyglobin switch) B.-L. HUANG*†,I.R.FAN-CHIANG*†,S.C.WEN*, H.-C. KOO*, W. Y. KAO*, N. R. GAVVA‡, AND C.-K. JAMES SHEN*‡§ *Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Republic of China; and ‡Section of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Communicated by James C. Wang, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, September 28, 1998 (received for review August 12, 1998) ABSTRACT A multiple protein–DNA complex formed at consist of six nuclear factor-binding motifs (10) that are a human a-globin locus-specific regulatory element, HS-40, occupied in vivo in an erythroid lineage-specific and develop- confers appropriate developmental expression pattern on mental stage-specific manner (11, 12). These include three human embryonic z-globin promoter activity in humans and GATA-1 motifs (b, c, and d), two NF-E2yAP1 motifs (59 and transgenic mice. We show here that introduction of a 1-bp 39), and a GT motif (Fig. 1A). In vitro binding studies indicated y mutation in an NF-E2 AP1 sequence motif converts HS-40 that the GT motif predominately binds the ubiquitous Sp1 into an erythroid-specific locus-control region. Cis-linkage factor (13). The GATA-1 motifs bind the GATA family of with this locus-control region, in contrast to the wild-type transcription factors, including the erythroid-enriched HS-40, allows erythroid lineage-specific derepression of the y z GATA-1 (14).
    [Show full text]
  • EZH2 Reduction Is an Essential Mechanoresponse for The
    Li et al. Cell Death and Disease (2020) 11:757 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02963-3 Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access EZH2 reduction is an essential mechanoresponse for the maintenance of super-enhancer polarization against compressive stress in human periodontal ligament stem cells Qian Li1,XiwenSun2,YunyiTang2, Yanan Qu2, Yanheng Zhou1 and Yu Zhang2 Abstract Despite the ubiquitous mechanical cues at both spatial and temporal dimensions, cell identities and functions are largely immune to the everchanging mechanical stimuli. To understand the molecular basis of this epigenetic stability, we interrogated compressive force-elicited transcriptomic changes in mesenchymal stem cells purified from human periodontal ligament (PDLSCs), and identified H3K27me3 and E2F signatures populated within upregulated and weakly downregulated genes, respectively. Consistently, expressions of several E2F family transcription factors and EZH2, as core methyltransferase for H3K27me3, decreased in response to mechanical stress, which were attributed to force-induced redistribution of RB from nucleoplasm to lamina. Importantly, although epigenomic analysis on H3K27me3 landscape only demonstrated correlating changes at one group of mechanoresponsive genes, we observed a genome-wide destabilization of super-enhancers along with aberrant EZH2 retention. These super- enhancers were tightly bounded by H3K27me3 domain on one side and exhibited attenuating H3K27ac deposition fl 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; and attening H3K27ac peaks along with compensated EZH2 expression after force exposure, analogous to increased H3K27ac entropy or decreased H3K27ac polarization. Interference of force-induced EZH2 reduction could drive actin filaments dependent spatial overlap between EZH2 and super-enhancers and functionally compromise the multipotency of PDLSC following mechanical stress. These findings together unveil a specific contribution of EZH2 reduction for the maintenance of super-enhancer stability and cell identity in mechanoresponse.
    [Show full text]