NL SPRING 2019 4Pp Publisher Final Revision 27.02.19
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook Initial Assessment Plus Document
FINAL HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook Initial Assessment Plus Document The Environment Agency March 2018 HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook IA plus document Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Andy Mkandla Steve Edwards Fay Bull Engineer, Water Associate Director, Water Regional Director, Water Laura Irvine Graduate Engineer, Water Stacey Johnson Graduate Engineer, Water Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: The Environment Agency AECOM HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook IA plus document Prepared for: The Environment Agency Prepared by: Andy Mkandla Engineer E: [email protected] AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Royal Court Basil Close Derbyshire Chesterfield S41 7SL UK T: +44 (1246) 209221 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: The Environment Agency AECOM HNL -
Common Right Assertion a Thesis Submitted to Middlesex University In
Enclosure Resistance in Middlesex, 1656 - 1889: A Study of Common Right Assertion A thesis submitted to Middlesex University in partial fulfilment of the requirementsfor the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Paul Carter School of Humanities and Cultural Studies August 1998 BEST COPY AVAILABLE Variable print quality I ABSTRACT This study provides a detailed examination of resistance to enclosure in Middlesex from the closing stagesof the English Republic to the late Victorian period. The evidence presentedin the following chapters establishesthat resistancewas widely spread both over time, (before, during and after any individual enclosure) and geographical location within the county. The study itself is divided into four general sections. The first section is divided into two chapters each having a separatefunction in setting the sceneprior to examining any of the Middlesex evidence. The first chaptersets out both the terminologyused by contemporariesand later by historiansto describe farming practice in general and the enclosure process in particular. Contemporaries, whether agriculturists or commentators on rural life, and historians have a myriad of terms and conventions to explain the way in which life was organised in the countryside of the past. This introduction to the terminology is necessary. Although I am primarily concerned with labour, and the transition from a rural community with access to the material benefits of common rights to one of exclusive wage dependence, it is still required that we are able to understand the description of agricultural practices as this transition progresses. The second chapter is an examination of previous historians' analysis of enclosure, and their accounts of the responsesof commoners to enclosure and the threat of enclosure. -
Ickenham Calling …
Ickenham Calling ….. The Newsletter of the Ickenham Residents’ Association Spring 2018 Affiliated to the Hillingdon Alliance of Residents’ Associations. Member of Herts. & Middx. Wildlife Trust, and London Green Belt Council. The Community Voice—monitoring the NHS in NW London and SW Herts. INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Ickenham Residents’ Association: E-Mail Address [email protected] CHAIRMAN’S WebSite www.ickenhamresidents.co.uk COMMENTS Twitter Acc. www.twitter.com/IckenhamRA AGM 2018 CHAIRMAN’S COMMENTS and community inclusive”. We very much HS2 welcome such suggestions, and indeed My last Chairman’s Comments referred to the often ask for opinions and suggestions on quarterly Residents Planning Forum organ- what we do. Sadly, this latest letter was PLANNING ised by LBH. The January meeting attended anonymous — we would welcome the INFORMATVES by committee members focussed on the new opportunity to discuss the issues raised in draft “London Plan” written by the Mayor’s person, and perhaps invite help from GOSPEL OAK 2018 Greater London Authority, out for consultation villagers to further some of the proposals. until 2nd March. The Plan aims for many ICKENHAM NATURE more affordable homes whilst creating a saf- We look forward to seeing as many of you RESERVES er, greener city that supports the health and as possible at our 2018 AGM on Friday, well-being of all Londoners. 20th April in the Village Hall. HEALTH MATTERS Jill Dalton In recent years the inner London Boroughs have delivered most of the capital’s housing POLICE MATTERS growth. With 66,000 new homes each year needed to meet demand, the new draft Lon- AGM of the ICKENHAM ICKENHAM don Plan aims to distribute new homes more RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATION FESTIVAL 2018 evenly around the capital. -
Colne River Valley
1. Colne River Valley Key plan Description The Colne River Valley Natural Landscape Area follows the Colne Within the northern Colne Valley, the settlement pattern is relatively River north to south on the western fringe of Greater London, from sparse, although there is a corridor of villages along the Grand Union Stocker’s Lake near Batchworth in the north to Heathrow Airport in Canal. To the south the valley is more densely developed than the the south. Between Batchworth and Uxbridge the valley floor consists north, with industrial towns such as Uxbridge, Yiewsley and West of a series of lakes and reservoirs, edged by ridges and plateaux within Drayton and London’s largest airport, Heathrow. The historic cores the neighbouring Ruislip Plateau (NLA 2) and the Hayes Gravels (NLA which remain within the settlements of Harefield, Uxbridge, West 10). As the River Colne meanders south and the Grand Union Canal Drayton and Harmondsworth suggest how settlement patterns have heads east, the topography gradually levels; historically the River evolved within this area. Despite the intense residential and industrial Colne would have meandered wider here, resulting in an extensive development around Uxbridge, the linear open space corridors area of deep silt soil across an exceptionally wide floodplain. The that follow the River Colne, Grand Union Canal and the lakes that Colne River Valley has been and continues to be important both as a they support are dominant landscape features. The waterways and 1. Colne River Valley River Colne 1. source of water and for trade navigation. lakes are typically bordered by marginal wetland vegetation and wooded areas. -
Ickenham HCA FINAL 2018
Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment November 2018 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Sam Griffiths Richard Hammond Mary Kucharska Landscape Architect, AECOM Associate Landscape Architect, Senior Consultant, AECOM AECOM Joe Critchley Built Heritage Consultant, AECOM Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position A 03/10/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Ickenham Neighbourhood Group Comments B 15/11/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Locality’s comments Prepared for: Locality AECOM 2 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Prepared for: Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited 36 Storey's Way Cambridgeshire Cambridge CB3 0DT UK T: +44 1223 488 000 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document Prepared for: Locality AECOM 3 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. -
Technical Annex
Crane Valley Partnership Strategy for the Crane Catchment 2018-2028 TECHNICAL ANNEX Final report, 9th March 2018 StrategyStrategy for for the the Crane Crane Valley Catchment, 2018-2028 2018-2028 Technical Annex Technical Annex This is the second part of the Strategy, prepared to guide the work of the Crane Valley Partnership over the period 2018-2028. It contains background material generated or collected during the preparation of the Strategy Contents Action tables for influencing and engaging to deliver the Strategy 1 Matrix of natural capital assets and ecosystem services 7 What’s important and why? - An assessment of the Crane 8 Valley’s natural capital assets Long list of projects identified in the ALGG Area Framework (No. 26 10) for the Crane Valley Agenda for the workshop held with Partners, 3rd October 2017 37 Summary of potential future governance models 39 Strategy prepared by Robert Deane and Louise Tricklebank of Rural Focus (UK) Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 9533053. www.rural-focus.co.uk Action tables for influencing and engaging to deliver the Strategy In order to achieve the priorities set out in Sections 6 to 8 of the main strategy report, the Partnership will need to engage with others, link in to existing policy, take advantage of funding opportunities and in-kind contributions and influence future decision making. The following tables provide a summary of the key organisations that the Partnership should prioritise working with. Thinking Spatially (Section 6 of the Strategy) Developers Engage with and influence developers to protect Funding opportunities are often available as part and enhance the central spine and look at of development proposals to deliver mutually opportunities to deliver elements of the All beneficial enhancements. -
Residents' and Environmental Services Policy Overview Committee
Public Document Pack Councillors on the Committee Residents' and Michael White (Chairman) Environmental Teji Barnes (Vice-Chairman) Mohinder Birah Peter Davis Services Policy Patricia Jackson Kuldeep Lakhmana (Labour Lead) Judy Kelly Overview Brian Stead Jas Dhot Committee Date: WEDNESDAY, 23 MARCH 2016 Time: 5.30 PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 5 - CIVIC CENTRE, HIGH STREET, UXBRIDGE UB8 1UW Meeting Members of the Public and Details: Press are welcome to attend this meeting Published: Tuesday, 15 March 2016 Contact: Alex Quayle Tel: 01895 250692 Email: [email protected] This Agenda is available online at: http://modgov.hillingdon.gov.uk/ieListMeetings.aspx?CId=114&Year=0 Putting our residents first Lloyd White Head of Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon, 3E/05, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW www.hillingdon.gov.uk Useful information for residents and visitors Travel and parking Bus routes 427, U1, U3, U4 and U7 all stop at the Civic Centre. Uxbridge underground station, with the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines, is a short walk away. Limited parking is available at the Civic Centre. For details on availability and how to book a parking space, please contact Democratic Services. Please enter from the Council’s main reception where you will be directed to the Committee Room. Accessibility For accessibility options regarding this agenda please contact Democratic Services. For those hard of hearing an Induction Loop System is available for use in the various meeting rooms. Attending, reporting and filming of meetings For the public part of this meeting, residents and the media are welcomed to attend, and if they wish, report on it, broadcast, record or film proceedings as long as it does not disrupt proceedings. -
Environmental Appraisal of the Proposed London Low Emission Zone
SCOTT WILSON Planning, Environment & Landscape Environmental Appraisal of the Proposed London Low Emission Zone ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT November 2006 Environmental Appraisal of the Proposed London Low Emission Zone Environmental Report 13/11/2006 Collated and Colin Bush edited by: Environmental Specialist Reviewed by: Andy McNab Director Approved by: Andy McNab Director Scott Wilson Scott House Basing View Basingstoke RG21 4JG Tel: +44 (0) 1256 310200 Fax: +44 (0) 1256 310201 London Low Emission Zone: Environmental Appraisal Environmental Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction......................................................................... 4 2 The Proposed Scheme ....................................................... 8 3 Alternatives ....................................................................... 13 4 Policy Context and Project Need .................................... 16 5 Method of Assessment .................................................... 24 6 Traffic................................................................................. 29 7 Air Quality.......................................................................... 33 8 Noise and Vibration .......................................................... 57 9 Landscape and Visual Amenity....................................... 63 10 Ecology ........................................................................... 72 11 Cultural Heritage ............................................................ 82 12 Waste.............................................................................. -
Ickenham Park ICKENHAM
Ickenham park ICKENHAM A LUXURY DEVELOPMENT OF 4 & 5 BEDROOM HOMES AND 2 BEDROOM Apartments Computer Generated Image – The Biltmore we care about the things you care about Positioning of property is Generous windows designed Crafted staircases to carefully considered to to maximise daylight in the enhance your hallway. maximise appeal. living areas Ickenham Park brings a welcoming sense of village life to a convenient urban setting. Nestling on the edge of Ickenham village in mature surroundings, this exciting new ICKENHAM PARK. CALA development ranges from spacious five everything you bedroom detached homes and four bedroom mews and townhouses, to luxury two bedroom look for in a home. apartments. Contemporary interiors are designed and a few features to offer light and space everywhere, with CALA’s you’d never expect. high specification and careful attention to detail in evidence throughout. Offering commuters excellent Local photography road, underground and rail links to London, SIMON COLLINS, cala PLANNING & DESIGN DIRECTOR Ickenham Park is clearly an idyllic urban village brimming with family life. Computer Generated Image - The Bellemeade The exterior of our homes are Sitting rooms/dining Bathrooms with gleaming all carefully designed to compliment areas designed with an white sanitaryware. the existing mature landscape accent on space and light. we care about the things you care about Sitting rooms and dining areas are Generous windows provide daylight designed with an accent on modern to the main living areas. family living. WE HAVE AN EYE FOR designed with gleaming white sanitaryware, while family spaces are eminently flexible and bedrooms are generously proportioned. From stylish yet unobtrusive interiors to EVERY LAST DETAIL. -
The Hillingdon Trail
The Hillingdon Trail A short story by Brandon Butterfield Whilst sitting at home one day, eating junk food and watching the television, the sound of a letter sliding through the letterbox caused me to spring to my feet. Who could be sending little old me a letter I wondered. I brushed the crumbs from my t-shirt and walked to the door to peruse over this exciting prospect. Low and behold it was a copy of the local publication, The Hillingdon People, curled into a cone and waiting for me to unravel it. I reached for the purpley-grey covered copy and began flipping through the pages. I always enjoy a bit of insight into the local happenings and hoo-has in Hillingdon, so I decided to close the booklet for the time being and save the juicy contents for later, when I could browse through the articles properly with a cup of coffee in the garden. When the sun was high in the sky, I popped the kettle on and made my caffeinated drink. No milk, no sugar. I brought my mug outside with The Hillingdon People rolled in my other hand, ready to uncover the latest local news while I soaked up some sun. I pulled up a wooden chair to my garden table, took a sip of my eye widening beverage, and began thumbing through the contents of the glossy publication. There were pieces about recent outdoor improvements that had been made in parks and on the Polish War Memorial, an article detailing the ongoing support the council is providing to elderly residents during the pandemic, and several other interesting tidbits to give food for thought. -
London Green Grid
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE MARCH 2012 LONDON PLAN 2011 IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK SPG THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID 3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID MARCH 2012 SPG THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY MARCH 2012 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978-1-84781-505-7 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk Crown Copyright All right reserved. GLA 10032216 (2011) The ALGG Project Team – Jane Carlsen, Peter Heath, Pete Massini, Jamie Dean, John O’Neil, Levent Kerimol, Matthew Carrington, Maurizio Biadene and Honoré van Rijswijk. Vector graphics by Design for London utilising baseline data from GIGL. Borough by borough workshops were coordinated by Design for London and consultant design advisors; J+L Gibbons, Adams and Sutherland with Jonathan Cook, Gross Max, East Architecture and Landscape, Lyn Kinnear, Peter Beard / Landroom, 5th Studio, Shape. These were attended by representatives from the London Boroughs and adjacent districts and counties, Transport for London, Environment Agency, Natural England, Groundwork London, London Parks and Greenspaces Forum, Geographic Information Greater London (GIGL), London Wildlife Trust and English Heritage. The Mayor would like to extend thanks to all who contributed to the work of the Area Framework Partnerships and to all those who responded to the consultation. Particular thanks are extended to the Mayor’s Design Advisory Panel and its ALGG Expert Panel: Terry Farrell, Val Kirby, Peter Neal and Ken Worpole. -
Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum Application
Ickenham Neighbourhood Plan Area application and Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum application Neighbourhood Plan Area application The historic Middlesex village of Ickenham, now part of suburban Greater London, has a strong sense of identity and community spirit. At the 2011 census, roughly 12,000 people lived in the village and our proposed Neighbourhood Area corresponds with local feedback on our borders. Those borders have changed over the centuries, but have remained largely constant since the Chiltern railway and RAF Northolt divided Ickenham from Harefield and Ruislip one hundred years ago, and since the Western Avenue was constructed to our south in the 1950s. Proposed Ickenham Neighbourhood Plan Area A more detailed zoomable map can be viewed on our website here: https://ickenhamplan.wordpress.com/what-area-would-a-plan-cover/ The starting point for the proposed neighbourhood area came from discussions with the Ickenham and Ruislip Gardens Residents’ Associations. Once we had established a proposed area, we consulted Residents’ Associations and Ward Councillors in neighbouring Ruislip, North Hillingdon, North Uxbridge and Harefield. Put simply, this is Ickenham. To the best of our knowledge, everyone living in the proposed area think they live in Ickenham and furthermore, we believe that nobody living outside the proposed area think that they live in Ickenham. Feedback has strongly suggested that we should write a neighbourhood plan for all of Ickenham, rather than just the built-up part of the village, or for the Ickenham electoral ward. Any other boundary would not be an Ickenham boundary, and would exclude parts of the village that people know and love.