In Salman Rushdie's Shalimar the Clown
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“Most Present of Absences” in Salman Rushdie’s Shalimar the Clown A Deconstructive Reading of Proper Names, Political and Military Terms, and Narration Word count: 25,109 Suparna Arora Student number: 01707814 Supervisor(s): Prof. Dr. Stef Craps A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Linguistics and Literature Academic year: 2018 – 2019 2 Acknowledgements To my parents, for always encouraging me to learn and supporting me unconditionally. To my sister, for conversations, thinking, love abound. To my grandparents, the most present of absences, whose lives I wish I could remember, and whose lives flicker amidst what I have read and written. A special thank you to Fien, without whom I would not have a PDF to upload at all. To Elliot, my personified Routledge companion to literature since 2013, and the only other person who could be bothered (bribed) to proofread this. And to Professor Stef Craps, for helping me find my way to this project from my initial urge to write about Partition trauma, and for taking a great deal of time out to discuss the topic with me and to edit this in its many stages of development. 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 2 A Brief History of Partition and Kashmir ......................................................................... 8 2.1 Making the Case for Post-1947 .............................................................................................. 8 2.2 On Kashmir ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Kashmir in Discourses of Nationhood ................................................................................. 17 3 Theoretical Framework .................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Narrative Structure: Perspective and Temporality ........................................................... 22 3.2 Derrida and Deconstruction ................................................................................................. 25 3.3 Trauma Theory and Narrative (Im)possibilities ................................................................ 29 4 Proper Names and Absences: Kashmira/India and Her Mothers .................................. 31 4.1 “India” ................................................................................................................................... 31 4.2 The Absences of Kashmir and the Kashmiri Mother ........................................................ 33 4.3 The Deaths of Boonyi ............................................................................................................ 37 5 A Deconstructivist Approach to Political and Military Terms ........................................ 40 5.1 Hindus, Muslims, and “Kashmiriyat” .................................................................................. 40 5.2 “Integrity”, “integral”, and “integer” ................................................................................. 44 5.3 “Freedom” ............................................................................................................................. 46 6 Narrative (Im)possibilities: Who Speaks and Who Can Speak? .................................... 49 6.1 “Crackdown” and “ethnic cleansing” ................................................................................. 49 6.2 The Fate of Pachigam ........................................................................................................... 53 7 Conclusion: Kashmiris, the “Most Present of Absences” Now ...................................... 59 8 Works Cited ....................................................................................................................... 64 Word count: 25,109 4 1 Introduction “Yet what did such maps and news about territory mean to those who had never known any place but their own home?” (Khan 125) The year of 1947 marked a major turning point in the history of the subcontinent. Undivided India under British rule comprised most of the subcontinent, including the princely states with which the British government established treaties of cooperation. The demand for independence did not culminate in a stable exchange of power but instead marked the beginning of a chaotic period amidst which two modern postcolonial states emerged. A Muslim homeland carved out of two disjointed ends of the subcontinent, Pakistan grew into an Islamic state, contrary to the ‘plural’ vision of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the Muslim League’s leader and the country’s first governor general (Khan 155). More than one million people were killed in the prolonged period preceding and following the announcement of independence and Partition, while an estimated fifteen million people migrated across hastily drawn borders seeking safety in nascent postcolonial states that had attained their long- awaited independence, but had few or no institutional structures to support the immense humanitarian support that was necessary for the unplanned and unexpected exodus and violence that followed the announcement of a new boundary that would cut through the subcontinent. A post-Partition novel set primarily in Indian-administered Kashmir, Salman Rushdie’s Shalimar the Clown singles out the contested territory between India and Pakistan as a space of significance. Disguised as a tale of love and vengeance centring around the characters of Shalimar and Boonyi, the novel transforms into a “magical realist crash-course on the history of Kashmir since Partition”, as summarised cleverly by Theo Tait (2). Their inter-religious marriage in a small village situated in Kashmir starts to fall apart, parallel to the growing animosity between religious groups in the aftermath of the Partition that begins to undo the religious coalescence of Kashmiriyat, of Kashmiriness. Boonyi’s extramarital affair with Max Ophuls, the American ambassador to New Delhi, and the birth of their daughter Kashmira/India, sets off a series of vengeful murders by Shalimar, a clown who transforms into an assassin. The plot moves forward in time from the Partition onwards, incorporating multiple events from Kashmir’s complex sociopolitical history that affect the characters of the novel in myriad ways and their distinct experiences through nuanced changes in perspective. This thesis analyses the significance of three examples of the “most present of absences” in the text, specifically in the case of proper names, military and political terms, and narration. 5 The tripartite analysis focuses on how the novel interrogates the nature of language, and rhetorically performs the anxiety about language before, during, and after conflict. The historical overview examines how and why the tensions between the two countries are concentrated and exacerbated in the region of Kashmir specifically, exploring the significance of the region to concepts of nationhood and identity for the Indian state. Taking Yasmin Khan’s analysis of the Partition and the aftermath as its focal reading, the historical overview evaluates the anxiety towards language during the Partition years, the retrospective accumulation of meaning for the terms “Pakistan”, “swaraj” [independence/self-rule], and “Partition”, and the unanticipated ways in which the people of the subcontinent were, and still are, affected. Stemming from this concern with language, the theoretical framework examines theories of language and signification according to structuralism and poststructuralism, elaborating on Derrida’s concepts of “différance”, “trace”, “supplement”, as well as his theory regarding proper names. Furthermore, the section also sketches the narrative structure of the novel, focusing on how the narrator focalises through different characters in the text. The theoretical framework additionally summarises relevant aspects of trauma theory, especially about the narration of trauma. Titled after its male protagonist Shalimar, the novel encloses the narratives of its myriad characters between introductory and concluding chapters named instead after a female character, doubly named “India” and “Kashmira” by her two mothers. The literary analysis begins with Kashmira/India, who is marginalised to the edges of the text, contained within these two introductory and concluding chapters, and absent from the central chunk of the novel. The thesis evaluates the significance of the two names ascribed to this character by her two biological and adoptive mothers in light of Derrida’s discussion of proper names. The following chapter extends the analysis of absences within names as perceivably present to an evaluation of the novel’s emphasis on the failure of political and military terms to incorporate their own consequences and the lived realities of people affected by the terms themselves, contending that the text challenges the singularity of hegemonic institutional narratives of nationhood and memory. The final chapter evaluates the tension between the possibility and the impossibility of narration, focusing on the role of the third-person focalising narrator in the depiction of trauma in the novel. This thesis attempts to fill an absence itself amidst current research on the novel. Pei-Chen Liao’s analysis proves that the novel lends itself to a deconstructive reading but focuses on the depiction of Shalimar