RBBC Local Character & Distinctiveness Design Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RBBC Local Character & Distinctiveness Design Guide RBBC Local Character & Distinctiveness Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document Draft for Consultation November 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5 Status ........................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose of the S P D ....................................................................................................... 7 How to Use This Guidance ........................................................................................... 7 2. Design Process ............................................................................................................ 8 Phase 1: Context Appraisal .......................................................................................... 8 Phase 2: Design ........................................................................................................... 9 Phase 3: Formal Planning .......................................................................................... 10 Phase 4: Delivery ....................................................................................................... 10 3. Policy Context ............................................................................................................ 12 National Policy Context ............................................................................................... 12 National Planning Policy Framework ................................................................................... 12 National Planning Practice Guidance .................................................................................. 12 National Design Guide ......................................................................................................... 13 Local Policy Context ................................................................................................... 14 4. Local Character and Distinctiveness ........................................................................ 16 Development of the Landscape .................................................................................. 16 Geology and Landform ........................................................................................................ 16 Landscape Areas ................................................................................................................. 17 Urban Settlements ...................................................................................................... 22 Banstead .............................................................................................................................. 23 Reigate................................................................................................................................. 24 Redhill .................................................................................................................................. 25 Horley................................................................................................................................... 26 5. Key Periods of Development and Character Areas ................................................. 27 Pre-Victorian Housing Including Village Centres ......................................................... 29 Victorian/ Edwardian including Town Centres ............................................................. 31 Residential Areas of Special Character (R A S CS) ....................................................... 32 1930s – 1950s Suburbia ............................................................................................. 41 1960s – 1970s Housing Development ........................................................................ 43 1980s – 1990s Estates ............................................................................................... 45 2000s – Most Recent Trends ...................................................................................... 47 6. Planning and Design Principles ................................................................................ 50 Key Design Principle 1: Designing Neighbourhoods ................................................... 51 Core Guidelines ................................................................................................................... 51 Car Parking & Access: Design and Layout.......................................................................... 53 Street Networks: Design and Layout ................................................................................... 55 Key Design Principle 2: Designing Buildings ............................................................... 60 Material Palette .................................................................................................................... 61 Roof Forms and Materials ................................................................................................... 63 Building Elements ................................................................................................................ 65 Other Elements .................................................................................................................... 70 Key Design Principle 3: Designing Landscapes .......................................................... 72 Biodiversity, Green Infrastructure & Landscape Protection ................................................. 72 Trees & Planting .................................................................................................................. 73 Landscape Structure ............................................................................................................ 76 Open Space ......................................................................................................................... 79 7. Case Studies .............................................................................................................. 80 Case Study 1 – One for One Replacement Housing ................................................... 81 Case Study 2 – Plot Sub-Division ............................................................................... 83 Case Study 3 – Infill Development to the Rear of Existing Housing ............................ 85 Case Study 4 – Detached House Replaced by Single Block of Flats .......................... 87 Case Study 5 – Mixed Use Development within a Historic Centre/ Town Centre ........ 90 Case Study 6 – Countryside Edge .............................................................................. 93 Case Study 7 – High Density Urban Intensification ..................................................... 96 Appendix .......................................................................................................................... 99 Appendix 1: Local Plan Policies .................................................................................. 99 Core Strategy ....................................................................................................................... 99 Development Management Plan (D M P) ............................................................................. 100 Appendix 2: Native Tree and Shrub Species ............................................................ 103 1. Introduction 1.1. Reigate & Banstead is a distinctive borough. It contains three main geological areas which historically have provided contrasting building materials together with a range of tree and shrub types, leading to its varied landscape character. The borough also fringes London, resulting in grand homes built in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries for city businessmen; and stretches right down to the Sussex border. 1.2. The character and local distinctiveness of Reigate & Banstead is part of what makes the borough special. The borough has distinctive town centres, landscapes, parks, historic buildings, character areas, conservation areas, open spaces and listed buildings which all play an important role in defining the local sense of place, character and distinctiveness. 1.3. At a time when there is demand nationally for additional housing, it is important to ensure that development addresses the local character and distinctiveness of its surroundings in relation to its immediate vicinity and also the broad locality within which it is located, taking into consideration local topography and accessibility to local services. To ensure good standards of design for residential and mixed use developments, this draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD ) has been produced to assist: • Landowners, developers and agents considering potential development proposals; • Householders considering residential conversions, alterations and extensions; • Designers drawing up schemes; • Developments Management Officers assessing the suitability of proposals when determining applications; and Figure 1: Intended users (source: Arun Design • Town and Parish Councils and Guide 2020) residents commenting on planning applications 5 Status 1.4. The draft SPD does not form part of the development plan and does not introduce new policy, but instead provides detailed guidance to accompany the policies in the Council’s Local Plan. Upon adoption, it is capable of being a material consideration in the determination of planning decisions. The diagram below explains the role of the SPD within the planning and development process. Figure 2: SPD in the
Recommended publications
  • T He H Eraldand G Enealogist
    A BIBILOGRAPHICAL AND CRITICAL ACCOUNT OF THE THREE EDITIONS OF WATSON’S MEMOIRS OF THE ANCIENT EARLS OF WARREN AND SURREY. _______________ BY JOHN GOUGH NICHOLS, F.S.A. ______________ [Extracted from THE HERALD AND GENEALOGIST.] 1871. WATSON’S EARLS OF WARREN AND SURRY. 193 One of the most remarkable genealogical works produced in England during the last century, both for the purpose and intent of its production and the labor and sumptuousness of its execution, is Watson’s History of the Earls of Warren and Surrey. It is embellished with every illustration, armorial, monumental, and topographical, of which the subject was capable: and further decorated with countless number of ornamental initials and vignettes (generally arabesques of considerable elegance) all impressed from copper plates. The detached engravings, more than fifty in number, are described in the full account which Moule gives of the book in his Bibliotheca Heraldica. pp. 441-445; but it is impossible to estimate the cost which must have been expended on so sumptuous a work. The author, the Rev. John Watson, M.A., F.S.A. had published a History of Halifax (4to. 1775) in which (pp. 523-525) he has given minute details of his own biography down to that period. He was born in 1724 at Lyme cum Hanley, in the parish of Prestbury, Cheshire 1; was elected a Cheshire Fellow of Brazenose 1746; became Perpetual Curate of Ripponden in the parish of Halifax 1754; F.S.A. 1759; Rector of Mouingsby, co. Lincoln, 1766; and Rector of Stockport on the presentation of Sir George Warren, K.B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nevill Effigy in the Parish Church of St Lawrence, Mereworth, Kent
    A Pied Bull: A Nevill Effigy in the Parish Church of St Lawrence, Mereworth, Kent MARCUS HERBERT THE FOLLOWING STUDY sets out to examine the history of an effigy of an armoured man in the church at Mereworth dating from the early Tudor period. It is generally held that the individual commemorated by the figure belonged to a cadet branch of the Nevill family of Westmorland. The reasons for this belief are explained together with a reappraisal of the dating evidence and an examination of the candidates. Introduction Around 1742 John Fane seventh Earl of Westmorland petitioned Joseph Wilcocks, Bishop of Rochester for a faculty to demolish the old parish church of St Lawrence at Mereworth and build another a bit further away.' The bishop had his commis- sioners examine both the old church and the plans for the new stating that 'the said parish church of Mereworth is an antient building and is decaying and that the situation of it is most inconvenient being near the bounds of the parish on one side, and that the greater number of the parishioners dwell at a great distance from it, and that the said Earle is desirous to pull down the said old parish church of Mereworth and to build a new one in a more convenient place and make a new church yard and assure the ground to the said parish forever at his own proper costs and charges'. Following the commissioners' report the bishop concluded that as 'no detriment, inconvenience or disadvantage' would be suffered by the minis- ter, parishioners or inhabitants, notice should be given in the church of the earl's intentions and inform those present that 'there will be as sufficient and more con- venient room in the new church than there is now in the old'.2 Fane's apparent concern for the parishioners was in reality a thinly veiled excuse to get rid of a building which spoilt his view and which was the final phase in his redevelopment For Jack Lowe, Samuel Lowe and Ellie Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin N U M B E R 2 7 5 June 1993
    Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY -m CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX 'A. Guildford 32454 Bulletin N u m b e r 2 7 5 June 1993 COUNCIL NEWS Guildford Castle Excavation The fourth season of excavation will take place in the Castle Cliffe Gardens (opposite the Museum side entrance) from 5th-25th July. There will be a special guided tour for members of the Society on Sunday 18th, starting at 2.30 pm at the excavation site. 'Young Archaeologists' Club "Roman Invaders' Day". The YAC and Guildford IVIuseum are planning to hold a Roman Invaders' Day on the 3rd July in Castle Cliffe Gardens, Guildford. Craftsmen and women will demonstrate Roman crafts and a group of "Roman" soldiers will demonstrate their skills under the supervision of IVIatthew Alexander. Admission by programme available on the day or in advance from Guildford Museum. Volunteers are needed and also help with refreshments. Telephone Sue Roggero on 0483-444752 for details. YACs in the Muniment Room. In March 1993 YAC members took part in a session in the Guildford Muniment Room at Guildford Museum. They looked at documents relevant to the village of Compton, which they will visit on April 17th. New Members We are pleased to welcome the following new members to the Society: Adams, J M, 6 Austen Road, Guildford, GU1 3NP Axton, Mr & Mrs A R, 14 Cherry Tree Avenue, Ashenden Estate, Guildford, GU2 5XB Borrett, S P, 12 Belmont Rise, Cheam, Sutton, SM2 6EQ Brayne, N M, 63 Spencer Road, Caterham, CR3 5LF Burns, E M, 6 The Gallop, Sutton, SM2 5RU
    [Show full text]
  • Picturesque England.Pdf
    1 2 3 t would require much more than a single volume to describe all the picturesque spots in our native land. But as far as space permitted, we believe we have given descrip- tions of all those places in England - whether towns, castles, manors, forests, lakes, or mountains - that are especially remarkable or that have either historical memories or poetic and romantic legend and lay associated with them. Nearly every rood of ground in our country has some glorious or pathetic mem- ory attached to it; its battlefields, its scenes of tragic events, or of happier associations, unite in giving a subtile charm to the land ”set in the silver sea.” In order to give a fair picture of our country, we have sought for the picturesque in each of its forty counties; devoting generally three articles to each; but of course increasing the number of descriptions in those counties that have the greatest claim on our attention from their scenery or associations. The southern counties possess many beauties: a charming coastline, and fertile and lovely pastures. In Wiltshire are those unique and ancient memorials of the past - Stonehenge and Abury; Hampshire has its old forest famed in history, and its adjoin- ing ”isle of beauty,” the Wight; and all possess ruins of fine old castles and abbeys, and two of our finest cathedrals - Canterbury and Winchester. The shires round London are well called the Home Counties, for there is a great home charm in their quiet pastures and well-wooded lands; while in the very centre of our country our greatest poet was born, in lovely Warwickshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Tatton Winter's Day
    BD JB P D ESIGN BY RINTED AND ESIGNED numbers and website address. website and numbers © 2000 C B B R OUNCIL OROUGH ANSTEAD AND EIGATE Trail, please turn to the back panel of this leaflet for contact for leaflet this of panel back the to turn please Trail, For further information about the circular walks and the Millennium the and walks circular the about information further For assistance with this project. project. this with assistance and the many other individuals, groups and organisations for their their for organisations and groups individuals, other many the and East Horley East miles) 6. (5.83 kms 9.4 Millennium Trail Millennium Also members of the Reigate Group of the Ramblers Association Association Ramblers the of Group Reigate the of members Also Earlswood Commons 7.5 kms (4.66 miles) (4.66 Commons kms 7.5 Earlswood 5. Borough Council Council Borough Reigate & Banstead & Reigate Alan Moore, who developed this guided walk. guided this developed who Moore, Alan 4. Reigate Tatton Winter 4.6 kms (2.85 miles) (2.85 Winter kms 4.6 Tatton Reigate 4. Thanks to:- Thanks North Downs Ridge 11.3 kms (7.01 miles) miles) Ridge (7.01 kms Downs 11.3 North 3. DCMP Shabden & Upper Gatton Parks 12.1 kms (7.51 miles) (7.51 kms Parks 12.1 Gatton Upper & Shabden 2. Banstead & Nork miles) & (5.09 kms Banstead 1. 8.2 iclrwl ubradnm Distance name and number walk Circular Circular Walks Circular The Millennium The 4.6kms (2.85 miles) (2.85 4.6kms follow guide.
    [Show full text]
  • SURREY. [KELLY's • Aisle Was Added in 1884: There Are About 400 Sittings
    14.501 REIGATE. SURREY. [KELLY's • aisle was added in 1884: there are about 400 sittings. The Thl'! Brabazon Home, Lesbourne road, was founded in tBBs register dates from the year 1871. The living is a vicarage, by Lady Brabazon (now Countess of Meath) for chronic eases in the gift of the Bishop of Rochester, gross yearly value among the members of the Girls' Friendly Society: invalids £r2o, with residence, and held since 1885 by the Rev. who require medical care are also admitted: there are beds Malcolm Charles Baynes M.A. of Trinity College, Cambridge. for 20 patients; 4 girls are also admitted for industrial The area is 380 acres; and the population in 1881 was 82o, training. The home is partly supported by subscriptions. but has since greatly increased. The ancient Market House stood at the west end of th& The mission church in Nutley lane, attached to the town, near to Nutley lane, formerly the entrance to Reigat& church of St. Mark, was erected and endowed in 1864, at from London: an interesting crypt, with freestone, still mark& the sole expense of the late William Phillipps esq. ; and the site. has sittings for about 300 persons. The curacy, which has The Red Cross inn stands on the site of a very ancient. an endowment of £120 yearly, with residence, has chapel dedicated to the Holy Cross. been held since 1889 by the Rev. Da.rid Marshall Lang Another chapel, said to have been dedicated to St. Law- K.A. of Corpus Christi college, Cambridge. rence, stood next to the White Hart hotel, and portions or The chapel of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Building & Development Services Information
    BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INFORMATION LIST OF BUILDINGS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORIC INTEREST Sixth Edition May 2014 Draft 14th May 2014 LIST OF BUILDINGS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND/OR HISTORIC INTEREST IN THE BOROUGH OF REIGATE AND BANSTEAD CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND KEY 2. COMMENTARY (A) POLICY GUIDANCE (B) STATUTORY LISTED BUILDINGS (C) CURTILAGE STRUCTURES (D) LOCALLY LISTED BUILDINGS (E) ANCIENT MONUMENTS (F) HISTORIC GARDENS (G) CONSERVATION AREAS (H) CONSULTATION ON REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS AND EXTENSIONS (I) GRANT AID 3. ARTICLE 4 DIRECTIONS 4. CONSERVATION AREA MAPS (To be added) 5. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS TO SCHEDULE 6. THE SCHEDULE If you have any questions regarding the list please contact John McInally (01737 276204). 1. INTRODUCTION This document lists in alphabetical street order the Borough's stock of Statutory Listed Buildings, protected curtilage or attached structures of known interest in the grounds of Statutory Listed Buildings, Locally Listed Buildings, Historic Gardens and Ancient Monuments. The Borough Council has published a list of sites of archaeological interest as a separate document. This document will be available on the council’s website. Please refer to the web site for updated information at www.reigate-banstead.gov.uk. KEY TO THE SCHEDULE AM ANCIENT MONUMENT I, II*, II, A, B, C STATUTORY LISTED BUILDINGS Ic, II*c, IIc, Ac, Bc, Cc CURTILAGE OR ATTACHED STRUCTURE OF KNOWN INTEREST IN GROUNDS OF STATUTORY LISTED BUILDINGS L LOCALLY LISTED BUILDINGS IIg HISTORIC GARDEN (English Heritage Register) Lg HISTORIC GARDEN (Local List) e, m, l Early, mid, late (e.g. m.17c) NOTE: Only curtilage or attached structures of known interest in the grounds of Statutory Listed Buildings have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Anonyme De Béthune
    King John: a Flemish perspective by the Anonyme de Béthune (Histoire des ducs de Normandie et des rois d’Angleterre) This is an ad sensum translation by Ian Short of part of Francisque Michel’s edition (Paris, 1840) which is accessible at: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k29431x/f148.image ... [90 ] During a truce between king Richard and [Philippe Auguste] king of France, Richard went off to attack [Aimar V] viscount of Limoges with whom he had a score to settle. There, in the course of one particular offensive, Richard was wounded in the chest by a shot from a longbow. There are many people who maintain that he was struck in the upper arm and died as a result of a wound that then festered. That, however, is just nonsense, for he was actually wounded in the chest between the shoulder and the breast. The bolt was extracted, but he died [on April 6 1199] as a result of the wound. Before dying, however, he made all his barons swear fealty to his brother John whom they were to make their king. Good king Richard then died and was buried at Fontevrault, that beautiful abbey for which he had such affection. He was interred at his father’s feet, and his heart taken to the mother church at Rouen. Richard’s brother John, who was count of Mortain, hurriedly declared himself duke of Normandy on account of the king of France who had begun waging war in Normandy. John hastened to Normandy where he had himself dedclared king.
    [Show full text]
  • LEATHERHEAD COMMUNITY TEST PITTING (See P2) SURREY
    Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Tel: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.surreyarchaeology.org.uk Bulletin 476 October 2019 LEATHERHEAD COMMUNITY TEST PITTING (see p2) Fieldwork Leatherhead Community Test Pitting – May 2019 Nigel Bond Our first Leatherhead Community Test Pitting activity took place between 4 and 22 May in the grounds of Rowhurst, a Grade II* listed building located on the north side of the town (National Grid Reference TQ 158 586). During the three weekends members of the public were given experience in both test-pitting and finds processing. There was a very well attended Open Day on Bank Holiday Monday, 6 May. An enthusiastic team of Society volunteers continued work throughout the three weeks. In total, ten test-pits and five small trenches were excavated. Initial finds processing was carried out on site and was completed at Abinger by the Artefacts & Archives Research Group (AARG) with expert review of early pottery by Louise Rayner (Assistant Director: Post-excavation and Specialist Services at Archaeology South-East). The finds were then returned to Rowhurt’s owner Lucy Quinnell for safe-keeping. Finds recovered ranged from Late Bronze Age / Early Iron Age to Modern but with a significant gap in the Medieval period. This was unexpected as timber from the Rowhurst house has been dendrochronologically dated to 1346. However, it now seems the site may have been deserted soon after that part was constructed, most likely due the Black Death. Building surveys carried out for the owner have suggested that this part of the building may have been left open to the elements without a roof for up to 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Warren Ancestors
    Chapter 21 Our Warren Ancestors Introduction My paternal grandmother was Kate Cameron Burks (1873-1954). Kate’s mother was Mary Jane Crawford (1837-1902), and Kate’s maternal grandmother was Elmony Lester (1815-1855).1 Elmony Lester’s mother was Rachel West (1788-1860), and Rachel’s pedigree is shown below: Rachel’s mother was Rosanna Lewis (1752-1818) and her maternal grandmother was Priscilla Brooks (1725-1797). Priscilla’s mother was Elizabeth Warren (1703-1735). Elizabeth appears in the red rectangle in the lower-right corner of the pedigree chart shown on the previous page. If you have counted the 1 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4632783/ElmonyLester-14Apr16.pdf generations correctly, you should have figured out that Elizabeth Warren was my 6th-great grandmother. Having nothing better to do one day, I decided to see how far back I could go on the Warren line. And of course, that led to several weeks of research and writing about this interesting branch of the “Quincy Oakley” family. The remainder of this narrative is about our Warren ancestors, who lived in England for many centuries, and before that, in France. And I learned that we have some amazing ancestors in our Warren line! DNA Evidence Elizabeth Warren’s parents were Thomas Warren (1682-1749) and Mary Hackley (1684-1750). In my earlier narrative about our Warner ancestors in Virginia,2 I wrote that I had four DNA matches with living descendants of this couple. Since that time, I learned about four more DNA matches that I have with living descendants of this couple.
    [Show full text]
  • THOUGHT for the WEEK “We Know What We Are, but Know Not What We May Be.” William Shakespeare
    School Office: 01737 649000 Weekly Newsletter Issue No.15 – 2016/2017 13th January 2017 The following items can be found within this week’s Newsletter: Whole School Chaplain’s 400 (page 2) Obituary: Melissa Newell (page 2) Applying for a Year 3 Flexi-boarding Place (page 3) Free School Meals (page 3) Partnership with Parents (page 4) Old Gattonians Rugby Fundraising Event (page 4) Reigate & Banstead Writes (pages 5-7) Available Trips on Wisepay (pages 8-9) Senior School MFL GCSE Conference (pages 10) Junior School Star of the Week (page 11) Dates for your Diary Spring Term 2017 (page 12) Next Week’s Menu (page 13) THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK “We know what we are, but know not what we may be.” William Shakespeare WHOLE SCHOOL Chaplain’s 400 The Bishop of Croydon and diocean education officer visit us today. This prompts reflection about what churches have to educate about as a calendar year begins, nine days from inaugurating a controversial US President, amid heightened international security, in a country which cannot supply basic transport to workers on whom our economy depends, alongside a health system failing employees and patients, and with new statistics showing mental illness among UK children still accelerating. These things are major obstructions. The difficulties of each were all avoidable. Priests choose and adapt the formulas used at the Eucharist or mass week by week. What is fine for Westminster Abbey will not work for school children, and what suits a hipster congregation will not connect with rural parishes in Yorkshire. I frequently use one of the lesser known ‘canons’, as the central prayer is called.
    [Show full text]
  • The Warren Family from England to Alabama
    THE WARREN FAMILY FROM ENGLAND TO ALABAMA 1066-2011 A family history began in 1979 By James R. Warren PREFACE AS a guide to this history, the reader should be aware of the format in which it is written. Every attempt was made to make this a readable account of the WARREN FAMILY. We did not want it to be perceived as a simple listing of obscure people with names and dates attached. In that format, interest is soon lost, and the book is set aside. History is boring to most of us because we do not make the connection that we were there as a family helping make it. We want each person to be real to the reader. That is why as much available information for each person was included, and more is added as new facts are discovered. The first section THE WARREN FAMILY ORIGIN gives the beginnings and history of the first people to use the name Warren (or de Varenne in France). It is provided to us largely by REV. THOMAS WARREN F.R.S.A. of Ireland from his History of the Warren Family A.D. 912-1902. The first WARRENS in his book, in turn, were taken from the REV. JOHN WATSON'S Memoirs of the Ancient Earls of Warren and Surrey and their Descendants to the Present Time, Volume One & Two, 1782. This brings the Warren Family out of France (Normandy) to England, and establishes their kinship to the Kings of England. THE LINEAGE also is taken from the above two accounts along with the Warren line of descent from Notes on the Southerland Latham and Allied Families by Edward Kinsey Voorhees, Atlanta, Georgia, Nineteen thirty one (For private Distribution) Microfilm No.
    [Show full text]