Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Nuclear Winter

Nuclear Winter

NuclearNuclear WinterWinter What is Nuclear ? Prediction by some scientists that and debris rising from massive fires of a nuclear war could block sunlight for weeks or months, cooling the earth's surface and producing changes that could, for example, negatively affect world agricultural and weather patterns. (EPA) •• FirstFirst studystudy suggestingsuggesting nuclearnuclear winterwinter conductedconducted inin 19821982 byby PaulPaul CrutzenCrutzen andand JohnJohn BirksBirks •• FollowedFollowed byby R.P.R.P. TurcoTurco,, O.B.O.B. ToonToon,, T.P.T.P. Ackerman,Ackerman, J.B.J.B. Pollack,Pollack, andand CarlCarl SaganSagan inin 19831983 byby firstfirst 1D1D modelmodel simulationssimulations •• StudyStudy attributedattributed atmosphericatmospheric andand environmentalenvironmental changeschanges toto burningburning forestsforests CarlCarl SaganSagan andand othersothers conductedconducted additionaladditional studiesstudies andand foundfound thatthat sootsoot fromfrom citiescities andand dustdust fromfrom thethe explosionsexplosions themselvesthemselves werewere alsoalso climaticallyclimatically significantsignificant andand couldcould coolcool thethe surfacesurface ofof thethe earthearth In 1983, R.P. Turco, O.B. Toon, T.P. Ackerman, J.B. Pollack, and (referred to as TTAPS) published a paper entitled "Global Atmospheric Consequences of Nuclear War" which is the foundation that the nuclear winter theory is based on. The theory states that nuclear explosions will set off in the cities and surrounding forest areas. The small particles of are carried high into the . The smoke will block the 's light for weeks or months. The land temperatures would fall below freezing. This combination of reduced temperatures and reduced light levels would have catastrophic ecological consequences. Average light levels would be below the minimum required for photosynthesis during the first 30-40 days after the explosion and most fresh water would be frozen. The TTAPS study concluded: "...the possibility of the of Homo Sapiens cannot be excluded." This effect is similar to what may have killed the dinosaurs. Consequences of Climatic Changes Natural Disasters

Nuclear winter theory is supported by observational evidence from natural catastrophic events:

‰ Volcano eruptions

‰ Asteroid impact

‰ Bushfires Krakatau 1883 >130 active volcanoes in , Krakatau eruptions: 535 AD, 1883 AD, 200X

Considerable impact on global temperatures was recorded for both volcano events! Krakatau Significant drop in temperature due to sun light absorption in emitted dust and !

Krakatau eruption 535-536 AD Sulfuric acid emission; According to ancient records evidence in Greenland and “Pustaka Raya Purwa” splitting Sumatra and Java! Antarctic ice cores

“There was a sign from the sun, the likes of which have never be seen or reported before. The sun became dark and the darkness lasted for 18 months. Each day it shown for about 4 hours and still this light was only a feeble shadow.” John of Ephesus, Bishop of Syria Santorini: 1627 BC, 5o cooling! Effects on Sunset

Scattering effects of photons on sub-micron sized particles in the dusty &

The vivid red sky in Spectacular sunrise and Krakatau’s impact on art! Edvard Munch’s painting sunset colors from sulfuric “The Scream” was particles and dust: inspired by the twilights Painting by William Ashcroft in Norway November 1883 Sulfur and Effects

SO2 + OH + 3H 2O ⇒ H 2SO4 + 2H 2O

Conversion of ejected gaseous SO2 into H2SO4 within six months Increase of stratosphere temperature by ~4o, decrease of temperature in hemisphere by ~0.2o. Effects on global temperature Asteroids

Relatively frequent events over the age of the earth, 47 are recorded on North American continent

Artist’s conception & computer simulation

same conclusion: ⇒ BIG SPLASH! Geological Time-scales

Catastrophic events are often associated with drastic geological changes. The best known example is correlated with the end of the period. This change is correlated with the sudden extinction of the Dinosaurs as well as with the disappearance of 60-80% of the existing marine species.

Common explanation, impact of a FREQUENCY OF IMPACTORS: large asteroid which caused dust eruption and long term decrease of Pea-size - 10 per hour global temperatures. Walnut-size - 1 per hour Grapefruit-size - 1 every 10 hours Basketball-size - 1 per month 50-m rock that would destroy an area the size of New Jersey - 1 per 100 years 1-km asteroid - 1 per 100,000 years 2-km asteroid - 1 per 500,000 years A "nemesis" parabolic comet impactor would give us only a 6-month warning.

Iridium rich layer Impact energy

The impact energy deposited = the kinetic energy (KE) of incoming object, where 1 KE = M ⋅v2 2 ν is large! Orbital velocity ~ 30 km/sec = 66,000 mph

π ⋅d 3 Mass is large! M = ρ ⋅ V = ρ ⋅ where d is the diameter of the object. 6

For rocks, Density ~ 5 gr/cc ===> Mass ~ 2.5 d3 tons, with d in meters

Converting to equivalent energy in units of tons of TNT. 1 ton TNT = 4 x 1016 ergs.

===> Impact energy = 250 d3 equivalent tons of TNT.

An object with d=4 meters packs the explosive power of the bomb (20,000 tons). If d=200 meters, a common size of asteroid, energy = 2 billion tons of TNT=2000 Megatons! City Buster: 15-m ===> 8.5·105 tons TNT ≈ 1 Megaton (MT). Serious local consequences, though atmosphere provides partial shield. Hydrogen-bomb scale, but without the radioactivity. People Buster: 1-km asteroid ===> 250,000 MT. No atmospheric shield. Hemispheric-scale effects. At threshold for global effects. Significant fraction of all humans killed. Planet Buster: 10-km diam asteroid ===> 250 million MT. global effects. Ejected, vaporized rock and water fill atmosphere ===> global winter ===> major extinction of life forms, including virtually all humans. Further consequences of smaller asteroid impact: Spreading of wild fires

Observational evidence in soot layers associated with Iridium enrichment Dire Consequences

The Chicxulup event corresponds to 70 Million Megaton TNT ~ 7000 times the maximum arsenal of US and Soviet Union! Scientific Studies on Nuclear Winter

• U.S. National Academy of Sciences http://books.nap.edu/openbook/0309036925/html/136.html • The Royal Society of Canada http://www.nap.edu/books/0309036925/html/553.html • U.S. Department of Defense • USSR All studies conclude “a clear possibility” of serious climatic consequences Causes of Change

•Forest Fires • Pyrotoxins • Dust from blasts • Soot from cities burning • Widespread ionizing radiation

Reduction of sun light follows absorption law:

−τ I = I0 ⋅e τ is absorption coefficient which depends sensitively on dust size and content, dust, aerosols, etc! Impact on temperatures

TTAPS study assumed 5000 Mt first strike with 0.1-0.33 Mt of dust per 1Mt of TNT exploded. The model estimates 225 Mt smoke emission and 960 Mt dust emission (≈ 960 Tg). The optical absorption parameter was calculated to: τ ≈ 4.5 indicating ~99% absorption! Drop in temperature by up to 40oC! Impact for food supply

• Foodstuffs are vulnerable to even a 5-10 degree average change, depending on selectivity • The “Little ” of the 16th –17th centuries was only an average of one degree less than mean temperatures. Revised Studies

3D model simulations (Malone et al. 1986) taking into account more complex atmospheric parameters reduce the absorption coefficient predictions. Takes also into account removal of dust by wind and rainfall. Significant lower dust emission of < 200 Mt!

Average summer temperature at Northern hemisphere drops by 10 oF Latitude effects

3-6 month cooling period, depending on weather and rainfall conditions. Only limited spread to Southern hemisphere except for wind related changes in Antarctic regions