DOCSLIB.ORG

Background Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Background Report Background Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..............................................................................................................................................5 Our Supporters .......................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................9 Past Indicators ........................................................................................................................................................9 Muskoka’s Watersheds ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Subwatershed Evaluation .................................................................................................................................... 14 Benchmarks ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Value of Ecosystems ............................................................................................................................................ 17 LAND ........................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Natural Cover....................................................................................................................................................... 20 Large Patch Size ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Interior Forest ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 Protected and Managed Areas ............................................................................................................................ 25 Riparian Areas...................................................................................................................................................... 27 Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 31 WATER ..................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Background .......................................................................................................................................................... 32 Total Phosphorus ................................................................................................................................................. 33 Fish Habitat .......................................................................................................................................................... 37 Fish Contaminants ............................................................................................................................................... 38 Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 41 WETLANDS ............................................................................................................................................................... 42 Wetland Values ................................................................................................................................................... 42 Wetland Area ....................................................................................................................................................... 43 Wetland Grades ................................................................................................................................................... 43 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................... 45 CLIMATE CHANGE .................................................................................................................................................... 46 Surface Water ...................................................................................................................................................... 46 Forests and Wetland ........................................................................................................................................... 47 Biodiversity .......................................................................................................................................................... 47 Community Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................... 47 Human Health ...................................................................................................................................................... 48 3 Tourism ................................................................................................................................................................ 48 Agriculture ........................................................................................................................................................... 48 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................................................... 49 List of Figures Figure 1: The Subwatersheds (Quaternary Watersheds) Included in the 2010 Muskoka Watershed Report Card. ................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 2: Muskoka River Watershed Elevations (From the Muskoka River Water Management Plan). ................ 13 Figure 3: Distribution of Lakes by Size in Muskoka's Watersheds. ......................................................................... 32 Figure 4: Long-Term Total Phosphorus Concentrations. ......................................................................................... 33 Figure 5: A Comparison of Total Phosphorus Concentrations (Predevelopment Estimates and Monitored Data).34 Figure 6: Example of Long-Term Monitoring Data. ................................................................................................. 36 List of Tables Table 1: Subwatersheds (Quaternary Watersheds) Included in the 2010 Muskoka Watershed Report Card. ...... 14 Table 2: Watershed Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 14 Table 3: Benchmarks Used in the 2010 Muskoka Watershed Report Card. ........................................................... 17 Table 4: Natural Area Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 18 Table 5: Subwatershed Grades for Percent Natural Cover. .................................................................................... 21 Table 6: Subwatershed Grades for Percent Large Patch Size. ................................................................................. 23 Table 7: Subwatershed Grades for Percent Interior Forest (100 m Buffer). ........................................................... 25 Table 8: Subwatershed Grades for Percent Actively Managed Areas. .................................................................... 27 Table 9: Shoreline Alteration Data for Specific Lakes. ............................................................................................. 28 Table 10: Subwatershed Grades for Percent Unaltered Riparian Area. .................................................................. 30 Table 11: Overall Subwatershed Grades for the Land Component of the 2010 Report Card. ................................ 31 Table 12: Subwatershed Grades for Percent Surface Area Considered Over Threshold for Phosphorus. ............. 36 Table 13: Subwatershed Grades for Fish Habitat. ................................................................................................... 38 Table 14: Subwatershed Grades for Mercury Contamination of Fish. .................................................................... 40 Table 15: Overall Subwatershed Grades for the Water Component of the 2010 Report Card. ............................. 41 Table 16: Wetland Coverage for Each Subwatershed. ............................................................................................ 44 Table 17: Overall Subwatershed Grades for the 2010 Report Card. ....................................................................... 45 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The background report for the 2010 Muskoka Watershed Report Card is a combined effort of many people and organizations across the watersheds. Without their expertise and volunteer efforts this report could
Load more

Recommended publications
  • District 7 Area
    ! Little Patterson Lake Blue Lake Dunchurch 30 Snakeskin Lake C104D 0 603 Dunchurch Lake Ahmic Lake D123 C104D Burk's Falls Kearney 1 1 ! ! 7 303 5 305 0 8 Algonquin Park Bell Lake 302 06 East Ryan Lake D Shawanaga Lake 7 Algonquin Park ! 803 Emsdale D ! Mckellar Lake McKellar C101 Hart Lake ! Clear Lake 95 Bay Lake 807 Whitehall 704 Swindon Manitouwabing River ! ! Manitouwabing Lake D C 80 8 4 Belfry Lake 3 8 78 06 Nine Mile Lake 7 ± 0 0 D101B Luck Lake Wolf Lake 405 83 Crown Lake 702 8 9 85 5 2 93 66 7 Portage Lake Manitouwaba Lake 85 Clark Lake D102B 79 7 Seguin River 8 7 Big East River C103D! C102 C 86 Deavy Lake 4 8 77 7 74 8 3 4 80 2 Peninsula Lake 1 Parry Sound ! 4 ! 10 320 8 Dwight 3 4 Huntsville 75 Mcfadden Lake Fairy Lake 4 Ashworth Lake Vernon ! 00 ! 210 Yarrow Lake 20 2 65 Brennan Lake 4 01 8 Horseshoe Lake 8 54 6 Kawagama Lake C102 7 63 350 Rosseau 50 68 4 ! 7 Wolfsban e Lake 64 5 Lake Of Bays 0 Kimmins Lake 3 0 0 2 3 Mary Lake 12 3 51 Dorset Hamer Lake ! 61 53 Lake Of Bays 340 Port Sydney 64 2 Kennisis Lake 11 2 ! 6 2 9 2 6 1 Lake Joseph 33 Avery Lake D103B Code Lake Lake Rosseau Lake Joseph 3 Ufford 64 7 Fawn Lake Black Lake 18 Pairo Lakes 0 Lake Rosseau ! 55 C102D 7 Baysville Mug Lake Kapikog Lake ! D102B Stewart Lake D103B 4 10 ! Teapot Lake Grouse Lake 1 Port Carling 5 MacTier 7 45 ! North Branch Muskoka River B Moon River Bass Lake Brandy Lake 4 ! 15 C102D 36 3 0 B Gullfeather Lake 4 C102D 35 41 6 ! C102D South Branch Muskoka River C Milford Bay Bracebridge B Anson Lake C114 32 B ! 7 Bala ! 44 Musquash River C114 Long
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Municipal Salt Management Plans in the District of Muskoka
    Monitoring of Municipal Salt Management Plans In the District of Muskoka December 2010 Monitoring of Municipal Salt Management Plans in the District of Muskoka INTRODUCTION The mission of the Muskoka Watershed Council (MWC) is to Champion Watershed Health. In pursuing this mission, MWC evaluates the watershed through research on, and analysis of, issues impacting the health of the watersheds. The Muskoka Watershed Report Card is the primary tool used to communicate the results of this work. MWC also prepares position papers on issues of concern. PURPOSE AND RECOMMENDATIONS The purpose of this paper is to report on the implementation of municipal salt management plans across Muskoka. The Province also uses salt on provincial highways and private shopping centres use salt on their parking lots to ensure safe conditions. These applications will not be addressed in any detail in this report. In general, municipalities have methodically implemented their respective plans over the last four years. In particular, significant capital investment has been made in the construction of new salt domes with impervious floor surfaces, the installation of proper facilities to store pre-wetting material (water or a de-icing solution added to road salt or sand before, or during, application to the road ), and the acquisition of trucks and computers with pre-wetting capability. This effort should be commended. Not all actions can be implemented at the same time, and additional work is required to completely implement the salt management plans. In particular, the following activities, recommended in the salt management plan, are outstanding: 1. Monitoring of snow storage areas to determine the levels of salt, oil/grease and heavy metals present in the snow melt that are released to the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Field Program
    MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM A Project of the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation 10 Pine Street, Bracebridge, Ontario PIL IN3 RESULTS OF 1992 FIELD PROGRAM MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM REPORT NO. 3 RESULTS OF THE 1992 FIELD SEASON Bonnie Bergsma Ron Reid Terry Rasmussen Genevieve Taeger March 1993 The Heritage Areas Program is sponsored by the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation, with major financial support from the Ministry of Natural Resources and other agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING ... 1 2. METHODOLOGY FOR BIOTIC FIELD PROGRAM ... 5 3. RECOMMENDATIONS .. 15 4. TECHNICAL SUMMARY: RECOMMENDED HERITAGE AREAS .. 17 Clipsham Woods .. 18 Fawn Lake Wetland .. 23 Gray Rapids .. 29 Langmaids Island .. 35 Lower Oxtongue River .. 40 Muldrew Creek .. 46 Riley Lake North .. 51 Scarcliffe Bay .. 57 Shack Creek Wetland .. 62 Spring Creek .. 70 Tasso Creek - Upper Big East River .. 71 Walker Point - Wells Creek .. 83 Westermain Woods .. 89 5. ADDITIONAL SITES OF INTEREST Sites from previous years - 1990 .. 93 Sites from previous years - 1991 .. 97 Other sites of interest from 1992 .103 6. LITERATURE CITED .106 7. APPENDIX 1 : RARE SPECIES STATUS .108 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING: The Muskoka Heritage Areas Program was established to identify the best examples of the District's natural and cultural heritage, using a systematic, 6bjective evaluation process, and to seek mechanisms for the protection of these heritage landscapes. 1992 was the third year of a planned three-year program, with field activities relating to natural heritage features, both biotic and scenic. Evaluation of cultural heritage also began in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka River Flood Plain Mapping Study
    The District Municipality of Muskoka Technical Report For Muskoka River Flood Plain Mapping Study H356689-00000-200-230-0002 Rev. 0 February 12, 2020 This document contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. The information in this document may not be disclosed to, or used by, any other person without Hatch's prior written consent. The District Municipality of Muskoka Technical Report For Muskoka River Flood Plain Mapping Study H356689-00000-200-230-0002 Rev. 0 February 12, 2020 This document contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. The information in this document may not be disclosed to, or used by, any other person without Hatch's prior written consent. The District Municipality of Muskoka Engineering Report Muskoka River Flood Plain Mapping Study Engineering Management H356689 Technical Report Report Technical Report H356689-00000-200-230-0002 B. Heppner, G. 2020-02-12 0 Final A. Breland A. Breland Schellenberg DATE REV. STATUS PREPARED BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY Manager Manager H356689-00000-200-230-0002, Rev. 0, Page 1 Ver: 04.03 © Hatch 2020 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents. The District Municipality of Muskoka Engineering Report Muskoka River Flood Plain Mapping Study Engineering Management H356689 Technical Report IMPORTANT NOTICE TO READER This report was prepared by Hatch Ltd. (“Hatch”) for the sole and exclusive benefit of The District Municipality of Muskoka (the “Client”) for the sole purpose of updating flood line mapping for particularly vulnerable portions of Muskoka River flood plains (the “Project) and may not be used or relied upon by any other party.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Water Quality Model and Lake System Health Program
    Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd. Revised Water Quality Model and Lake System Health Program Prepared for: District Municipality of Muskoka Job #: J150074 April 2016 Final Report Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd. J150074 , District Municipality of Muskoka Revised Water Quality Model and Lake System Health Program April 5, 2016 HESL Job #: J150074 Ms. Christy Doyle Director of Watershed Programs District Municipality of Muskoka 70 Pine St. Bracebridge ON P1L 1N3 Dear Ms. Doyle: Re: Revised Water Quality Model and Lake System Health Program – Final Report We are pleased to submit this final report of the Revised Water Quality Model and Lake System Health Program for the District Municipality for Muskoka lakes. This has been a most challenging and scientifically interesting project, and we thank The District of Muskoka for their continued support over the course of the last several years while we worked to develop recommendations to revise the program to reflect the results of review in 2013, and again in 2015 to change the program emphasis. We appreciate that there may still be discussions required to move the technical recommendations presented herein into planning policy and look forward to the opportunity to assist with that. Sincerely, per: Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd. Neil J. Hutchinson, Ph.D. President [email protected] Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd. J150074 , District Municipality of Muskoka Revised Water Quality Model and Lake System Health Program Signatures Dörte Köster, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Water Management in the Muskoka River Watershed | November 2020
    T H E E V O L U T I O N O F Water Management I N T H E M U S K O K A R I V E R W A T E R S H E D B y C h r i s C r a g g N o v e m b e r 2 0 2 0 The Evolution of Water Management in the Muskoka River Watershed | November 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 History of Water Management in Muskoka .................................................................................................. 3 Watershed Description ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Technical Considerations ................................................................................................................................ 8 Impact of Water Retaining Structures ......................................................................................................... 10 The Current Water Management Plan ....................................................................................................... 11 Fish Spawning Impacts ................................................................................................................................... 11 Recent Water Quantity Experience ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Lakes with an Asterisk * Do Not Have Depth Information and Appear with Improvised Contour Lines County Information Is for Reference Only
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Lakes with an asterisk * do not have depth information and appear with improvised contour lines County information is for reference only. Your lake will not be split up by county. The whole lake will be shown unless specified next to name eg (Northern Section) (Near Follette) etc. LAKE NAME COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY Great Lakes GL Lake Erie Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Port of Toledo) Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Western Basin) Great Lakes GL Lake Huron Great Lakes GL Lake Huron (w West Lake Erie) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (Northeast) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (South) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (w Lake Erie and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Rochester Area) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Stoney Pt to Wolf Island) Great Lakes GL Lake Superior Great Lakes GL Lake Superior (w Lake Michigan and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake St Clair Great Lakes GL (MI) Great Lakes Cedar Creek Reservoir AL Deerwood Lake Franklin AL Dog River Shelby AL Gantt Lake Mobile AL Goat Rock Lake * Covington AL (GA) Guntersville Lake Lee Harris (GA) AL Highland Lake * Marshall Jackson AL Inland Lake * Blount AL Jordan Lake Blount AL Lake Gantt * Elmore AL Lake Jackson * Covington AL (FL) Lake Martin Covington Walton (FL) AL Lake Mitchell Coosa Elmore Tallapoosa AL Lake Tuscaloosa Chilton Coosa AL Lake Wedowee (RL Harris Reservoir) Tuscaloosa AL Lay Lake Clay Randolph AL Lewis Smith Lake * Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Logan Martin Lake Cullman Walker Winston AL Mobile Bay Saint Clair Talladega AL Ono Island Baldwin Mobile AL Open Pond * Baldwin AL Orange Beach East Covington AL Bon Secour River and Oyster Bay Baldwin AL Perdido Bay Baldwin AL (FL) Pickwick Lake Baldwin Escambia (FL) AL (TN) (MS) Pickwick Lake (Northern Section, Pickwick Dam to Waterloo) Colbert Lauderdale Tishomingo (MS) Hardin (TN) AL (TN) (MS) Shelby Lakes Colbert Lauderdale Tishomingo (MS) Hardin (TN) AL Tallapoosa River at Fort Toulouse * Baldwin AL Walter F.
    [Show full text]
  • (COMMERCIAL LIST) BETWEEN: 1711423 ONTARIO LIMITED Ap
    Court File No. CV-20-00637615-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) B E T W E E N: 1711423 ONTARIO LIMITED Applicant and OLD MILL MARINA (KAWAGAMA) LIMITED Respondent APPLICATION UNDER Section 243(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, and Section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 FIRST REPORT TO THE COURT OF MNP LTD IN ITS CAPACITY AS RECEIVER AND MANAGER OF THE ASSETS, UNDERTAKINGS, AND PROPERTIES OF OLD MILL MARINA (KAWAGAMA) LIMITED September 22, 2020 Page 1 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................................... 5 DISCLAIMER AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ..................................................................... 5 RECEIVER’S ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................... 6 SALE PROCESS ........................................................................................................................... 8 SALE AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………..12 CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES ............................................................................................. 13 STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS ..................................................... 14 PROFESSIONAL FEES ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka Heri1"Ageareas Program
    MUSKOKA HERI1"AGE AREAS PROGRAM A Project of the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation 10 Pine Street, Bracebridge, Ontario PIL IN3 NATURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION OF MUS KOKA P/5pared By Ron Reid aD(l Bonnie Bergsma TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Executive Summary and Recommendations ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Approach .. 1 1.2 Summary of Field Work 5 1.3 Integration 9 1.4 Evaluation of Candidate Areas 10 2.0 MUSKOKA'S NATURAL HERITAGE: AN OVERVIEW 2.1 Geology and Geomorphology 19 2.2 Climate and Hydrology 21 2.3 Vegetation 23 2.4 Wildlife 25 2.5 Definition of Subdistricts 26 3.0 INDIVIDUAL AREA AND SITE DESCRIPTIONS 3.1 Coastal Barrens Subdistrict Bone Island Heritage Area 31 Cognashene Lake-Longuissa Bay Heritage Area 34 Gibson River Corridor Heritage Area 37 McCrae Lake Heritage Area .. 40 Moreaus Bay Heritage Area :.......................................... 44 Pine Islands Heritage Area 47 3.2 Severn Corridor Subdistrict Clipsham's Wood Heritage Area 50 Ellison Bay Wetland Heritage Area 53 Lion's Head Heritage Area 57 Lost Channel Heritage Area 60 Lower Swift Slope Heritage Area 64 McLean Bay Wetland Heritage Area 67 Moose Lake Heritage Area 70 Neipage Lake Complex Heritage Area 73 Port Severn Outlier Heritage Area 76 Potato Island Heritage Area 79 Port Severn Lacustrine Deposit Heritage Site 82 3.3 Gibson Subdistrict Bala Bog Heritage Area 84 Concession Lake Heritage Area 87 Deer Lake Complex Heritage Area 90 Gray Rapids Heritage Area 95 Loon Lake Wetland Heritage Area ..~................................................................. 99 Lower Moon River Heritage Area 103 Morrison Lake Wetland Heritage Area 106 Bass Island A.C.P.F.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Muskoka Recreational Water Quality Model Review
    DISTRICT OF MUSKOKA RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW TOWNSHIP OF MUSKOKA LAKES JUNE 16, 2016 RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW PRESENTATION FLOW • INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT • MODEL REVIEW: KEY FINDINGS • PLANNING IMPLICATIONS • NEXT STEPS • DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS THE PROJECT: RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW KEY FINDINGS 1. MODEL IS NOT SUPPORTED ON AN INDIVIDUAL LAKE BASIS 2. ALL LAKES WARRANT PROTECTION, WITH MULTIPLE STRESSORS CONSIDERED 3. MOVE TOWARD RELIANCE ON MEASURED CHANGES AND OBSERVED WATER QUALITY - PHOSPHORUS IS STILL A GOOD INDICATOR 4. SEVEN “TRANSITIONAL” LAKES WARRANT ADDITIONAL STUDY “Phosphorus is the window into our lakes” RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW PLANNING IMPLICATIONS 5 MUSKOKA WATER QUALITY POLICIES Lake Classification Policy Requirement Implementation Over Threshold Lot Level Study High Sensitivity Lot Level Study SITE PLAN Moderate Sensitivity Site Plan Required Approach Current Policy Low Sensitivity Site Plan Recommended BMPs Standard Categories Implementation Vegetated Buffers X Shoreline Naturalization X Standard Protection Site Plan Required Soil Protection X On‐Site Stormwater Control X Transitional Lakes (7) Enhanced Protection Limit Impervious Surfaces X Enhanced Septic Setback (30m) X Lake Level Study Enhanced Lot Size X Direction Securities and Compliance Monitoring X • Simplified and consistent Proposed Policy • Leading-edge and defensible • Based on observable indicators • 20% of lakes impacted INTERIM COMMENTING • EXISTING POLICIES ARE OPEN TO CHALLENGE • ALSO CHALLENGES
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka Heritage Areas Program Results of Field
    MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM A Project of the D~ct Municipality of MUlkoka and the MUlkoka Heritage Foundation 10 Pine Street, Bracebrldge, Ontatlo P1 L 1N3 RESULTS OF \ 1991 FIELD PROGRAM MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM REPORT NO. 2 RESULTS OF THE 1991 FIELD PROGRAM Ron Reid Bonnie Bergsma Bob Bowles Adr i ane Po 11ard Dan Whittam Andrew White February 1992 The Heritage Areas Program is sponsored by the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation, with major financial support from the Ministry of Natural Resources and other agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING ... 1 2. METHODOLOGY FOR BIOTIC FIELD PROGRAM ... 6 3. RECOMMENDATIONS .. 17 RECOMMENDED NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS 8;g East River .. 20 Novar Bog .. 36 Axe Lake .. 43 Lewisham wetlands ,.. 48 Jevins Lake .. 54 Br itann·; a Es k e r . 5 9 Beaumont Bay Carbonates .. 64 Dwight Bog .. 71 OTHER SITES OF INTEREST .. 76 LITERATURE CITED .. 83 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING: The Muskoka Heritage Areas Program was established to identify the best examples of the Distrlct's natural and cultural heritage, using a systematic, objective evaluation process, and to seek mechanisms for the protection of these heritage landscapes. 1991 was the second year of a planned three-year program, with field activities relating to natural heritage features, both biotic and abiotic. Evaluation of cultural heritage wi 11 begin in 1992. This report provides a preliminary analys;'s of the significance o~ candidates studied in 1991 by the Heritage Areas field crew. The final evaluation of all candidates will take place late in 1992, after field work has been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka Official Plan Schedule C1: Natural Heritage Features and Areas
    TOWNSHIP OF PERRY DISTRICT OF PARRY SOUND TOWN OF KEARNEY DISTRICT OF PARRY SOUND TOWNSHIP OF MCMURRICH-MONTEITH DISTRICT OF PARRY SOUND Foote Lk Axe Lk Buck Perch Lk Boundary Lk Meadow Haller Lk Upper Lk Novar Lk Axe Lake Buck 592 Raft Lk Wetland River ¨¦§ Oudaze BIG EAST RIVER Lk Greenish Lk Surprise Lk Bing Lk Lower Raft Lk McBrien Ripple Lk Tonawanda Pond Verner Lk Crk Palette Lk Greens Lk T o w n o f Township of North Little Dotty Lk Muskoka Official Plan Schedule Clark Lk Waseosa Lk Long Lk Tasso Marion Lk ALGONQUINPROVINCIAL PARK H u n t s v i l l e Lake of Bays Nelson Lk Crk Fox Erkett's Lk Pond Heck Lk Whites Lk Little Nelson Lk West 11 Little S I N C L A I R & F I N L A Y S O N 1 ¨¦§ Maggie Lk C : Natural Heritage CARDWELL CARDWELL Arrowhead Lk Sims Lk ª Jessop Lk South RD N Brooks Lk Nelson Lk Cardwell Lk W 31 O Bella Lk T Dotty Lk S Arrowhead Lk D Slim Lk O C H A F F E Y S T I S T E D O H Mayflower Lk Tasso Lk ARROWHEAD Big Features and Areas Rebecca Lk Doughnut Lk Matthews Lk RAVENSCLIFFE RD Hoover Lk Sly Lk Benson Lk Hendersons Lk ª ª Oxbow Lk Woods Lk Mansell Lk Little ª 8 Golden 45 Hoover Lk City Lk 3N Loon Lk Toad Lk YEARLEY RD E Flossie Lk Regulated Habitat, Areas of Natural and Scientific Lamberts Lk T W Robinson Lk Harp Jerry Lk Little J.
    [Show full text]