Corridor Segment Committee 3 Meeting

July 26, 2010

Victoria, Texas I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 3 Meeting July 26, 2010 1:00PM – 4:00PM

Welcome/Introductions

Administrative Marc Williams Facilitator ƒ Review May 2010 Meeting Notes ƒ Planning Features Map Book available for additional input

Finalize the Transportation Facilities to be Considered when Marc Williams Developing the I-69 Corridor Program Map Facilitator

ƒ The CSC members will be asked if they have any final edits or additional input on which specific routes should be upgraded to interstate standards as a part of I-69 or which facilities the interstate should connect to and why.

CSC Review of the Updated Conceptual Interstate Layout within Marc Williams the CSC Limits Based on Input Received During the May 2010 Meeting Facilitator

ƒ CSC Group Activity to review and begin to finalize the updated Conceptual Interstate Layout, which identifies the routes to be upgraded to interstate standards and where consideration should be given to relief routes, shifts in location, urban and rural typical section limits, access road limits, and interchange locations. ƒ Once the CSC completes work on reviewing and updating the Conceptual Interstate Layout, order of magnitude costs and potential individual project limits can begin to be developed for CSC review and input at the next CSC meeting. ƒ The Conceptual Interstate Layout is preliminary and is for planning purposes only as part of the process of developing a CSC based I-69 Corridor Program of individual projects.

Discussion of Next Meeting Activities TxDOT

ƒ Review CSC edits to the Conceptual Interstate Layout. ƒ Begin the process of reviewing potential project limits and order of magnitude cost estimates associated with developing an I-69 Corridor Program.

Wrap Up TxDOT

ƒ Website update – http://www.txdot.gov/public_involvement/committees/i69/default.htm ƒ Meeting Scheduling

Adjourn Facilitator S an J a c in

t o R i ¤£290 ve ÿÆ71 ÿÆ21 Spring r 290 AUSTIN- ¤£ BERGSTROM Lake Bastrop Prairie View Liberty INTERNATIONAL Tomball AIRPORT Bastrop Waller Dayton Lake Houston 90 HOUSTON INTER- ¤£ Blanco Buda 304 Pine Island Æ249 ÿÆ 237 ÿ CONTINENTAL AIRPORT Å1960 Grand Parkway ÿÆ Å1960 Smithville o Humble Jefferson 159 Æ146 Kyle ÿÆ ¤£290 )"8 £59 ÿ Bellville ¤ 8 35 ") Wallisville Lake ¨¦§ ÿÆ71 Cedar Creek Reservoir (fayette) Waller Sheldon Reservoir ÿÆ21 Harris Mont Belvieu 10 La Grange Æ36 ¨¦§ ÿ Houston Lake Anahuac Canyon Lake San Marcos 142 ÿÆ Lockhart Pattison Katy Addicks Reservoir Anahuac San Felipe 10 BaytownCedar Bayou Generating Pond 124 ¨¦§ Lynchburg Reservoir Chambers ÿÆ Hunter ÿÆ80 Sealy 6 Î 95 Brookshire US 90A") Transit 99 ÿÆ Barker Reservoir ") Sa Corridor Bellaire 123 10 n Fulshear La Porte Columbus 59 ÿÆ ¨¦§ B Simonton ¤£ Pasadena Weimar e 610 HOBBY AIRPORT Schulenburg rn "99 SH a36 ) ¨¦§ ELLINGTON FIELD New Braunfels 90 rd Luling ¤£ Flatonia R Wallis B Sugar Land o Lake Dunlap iv r er er az os Riv 8 8 Orchard Richmond ")Missouri City )" o Galveston Bay 10 Pearland ÿÆ146 35 ÿÆ46 § PoEagletent Lakeial Upgrade Fort Bend ¨¦§ ¨¦ 77 Fresno Lake Mcqueeney £ Eagleof Exi Lakesting RoadwaysÆ60 US 59 to FriendswoodSH 146 League City ÿÆ87 80 ¤ ÿ 90A90 ÿÆ 183 304 ¤£ Rosenberg £90A90 ¤£ ÿÆ East Bernard Seguin ¤£ Beasley Pleak Smithers Lake 45 Gonzales Wharton Economic Development Corporation ÿÆ6 ¨¦§ US 59 Upgrade ¤£59 Galveston County Water Reservoir Lake Gonzales Proposed Overpasses at CR90A90 467, CR 961, C Fairchilds ¤£ Kendleton Alvin 197 ¤£ o Galveston 10 City of Wharton )" 108 ¨¦§ Pierce Pumping Plant Road, FM 102, FM 1301, l 288 )" o ÿÆ Brazoria Shiner Hallettsville Æ71 & W harton EDC Needville B Texas City

Æ97 CR 222, CR 231, HWY 60, Ponderosa, FM 1161, ÿ r ÿ r Î

a 36 Æ a d ÿ CR 216, CR 214, CR 221, CR 212 o z R Wharton o i v s Î Æ95 (Resolution No. 2009-04 & 2009-60) e Mustang Lake East/ Mustang Lake West ÿ ¤£77A77 r Wharton R Galveston 87 i ÿÆ35 £ v ¤ FM 102 Extension e Port Connection S r Yoakum an Port of Houston B William Harris Reservoir Nixon East Loop e r Eagle Nest Lake/ Manor Lake to US 59S City of Wharton n Æ111 a 181 ÿ r El Campo d ¤£ R Angleton Æ97 Stockdale N i ÿ West Columbiave a r v US 59 i L d Improve FreightSan Rai Bernardl Reservoirs #1, #2, #3 87 a a ¤£ va d Floresville c from Port of Houston Brazoria Reservoir Lake Jackson Cuero a Ri Brazoria R ve to US 59 S Poth G ive r Sweeny 322 ua r Æ d ÿ a Ganado l Proposed KCS Rail Bypass Freeport Æ72 u 36 ÿ p ÿÆ e (City of El CampoÿÆ71 - 123 Æ80 Bay City Æ ÿ R Lake Texana 111 Î ÿ i Æ v Resÿolution No. R2008-13) Falls City Yorktown e SH 36 Port Gulf of Mexico r Edna 77A ÿÆ35 Nordheim ¤£77 87 Connection ¤£ ¤£59 ÿÆ172 (Freeport) Karnes City Runge 183 Victoria LaUS Ward 59/SH 111 ¤£ o US 87 Port Port Connection ÿÆ60 Kenedy (Point Comfort) Coleto Creek Power Connection ÿÆ35 South Texas Project Reservoir Transportation facilities to consider when developing (Port Lavaca) Coleto Creek Reservoir Palacios the I-69 Corridor Program as proposed by members of Æ239 ÿ Æ185 Goliad Relief Route ÿ Cox Lake/ Raw Water Lake/ Recycle Lake Goliad Î Point Comfort Corridor Segment Committee 3 San Port Lavaca (North or South) Ant Î oni Calhoun 37 Æ72 o Highway - Interstate ¨¦§ ÿ 87 ¨¦§ Potential Facility A 59 R ¤£ Port Authority ta ¤£ iv ¤£ Highway - US Marked sc e o r Planned Controlled r Access s 316 Æ e a SH 185 ÿÆ ÿ Highway - State Marked

R v i Port Connection i v 181 Existing Controlled Access e Beeville Urban Area r ¤£ R 239 (Port of Victoria) Æ Relief Route ÿ s Choke Canyon Chase Field SH 99 Study Area o Reservoir 185 County River Industrial Park Exelon NuclearÆ35 Power Plant Æ z ueces ÿ ÿ ThreeN Rivers Beeville 77 Seadrift ¤£ (Planned Power Plant) Commercial Air a port 202 Austwell Railroads r ÿÆ (Possible I-69 connection o This is an updated map from the February & May Union Pacific (UP) B US 181 to and Interchange) Î Primary Deep Draft Seaport George West 2010 Corridor Segment Committee (CSC) meetings Port of Corpus Christi Refugio Kansas City Southern (KCS) Inactive M that reflects continuing CSC member input on Shallow Draft & Barge Port i s Potential Refugio Kansas City Southern (KCS) Î s identifying transportation facilities to be Brenham i Woodsboroon Relief Route R considered when developing the I-69 Corridor Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) i 359 veand Rail Bypass Program. During future CSC meetings, the CSC ÿÆ r Other Existing 281 members will continue to have the opportunity to ¤£ 3 Exits Abandoned Rail 59 Lake Corpus Christi review and make further edits to this map. WORKING ¤£ 77 Mathis ¤£ CSC Identified Facilities DRAFT Bayside Fulton Please note that the purpose of collecting this Pernitas Point I-69 Corridor PublProgramic Lands Facility Sinton information was to gather ideas from the 5 37 Rockport ¨¦§ individual Committee members. These maps I-69 Corridor Program Connecting Facility 0 7.5 15 30 Taft San Patricio do not represent the recommendations of Potential Relief Route Orange Grove ÿÆ35 Miles 181 Gregory CSC or TxDOT. I-69 Corridor Program Rail Facility Edroy Odem ¤£ Aransas Pass 1 Inch = 15 Miles 7/19/2010 Î o