DOCSLIB.ORG

Corridor Segment Committee 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Corridor Segment Committee 3 Meeting July 26, 2010 Victoria, Texas I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 3 Meeting July 26, 2010 1:00PM – 4:00PM Welcome/Introductions Administrative Marc Williams Facilitator Review May 2010 Meeting Notes Planning Features Map Book available for additional input Finalize the Transportation Facilities to be Considered when Marc Williams Developing the I-69 Corridor Program Map Facilitator The CSC members will be asked if they have any final edits or additional input on which specific routes should be upgraded to interstate standards as a part of I-69 or which facilities the interstate should connect to and why. CSC Review of the Updated Conceptual Interstate Layout within Marc Williams the CSC Limits Based on Input Received During the May 2010 Meeting Facilitator CSC Group Activity to review and begin to finalize the updated Conceptual Interstate Layout, which identifies the routes to be upgraded to interstate standards and where consideration should be given to relief routes, shifts in location, urban and rural typical section limits, access road limits, and interchange locations. Once the CSC completes work on reviewing and updating the Conceptual Interstate Layout, order of magnitude costs and potential individual project limits can begin to be developed for CSC review and input at the next CSC meeting. The Conceptual Interstate Layout is preliminary and is for planning purposes only as part of the process of developing a CSC based I-69 Corridor Program of individual projects. Discussion of Next Meeting Activities TxDOT Review CSC edits to the Conceptual Interstate Layout. Begin the process of reviewing potential project limits and order of magnitude cost estimates associated with developing an I-69 Corridor Program. Wrap Up TxDOT Website update – http://www.txdot.gov/public_involvement/committees/i69/default.htm Meeting Scheduling Adjourn Facilitator S an J a c in t o R i ¤£290 ve ÿÆ71 ÿÆ21 Spring r 290 AUSTIN- ¤£ BERGSTROM Lake Bastrop Prairie View Liberty INTERNATIONAL Tomball AIRPORT Bastrop Waller Dayton Lake Houston 90 HOUSTON INTER- ¤£ Blanco Buda 304 Pine Island Æ249 ÿÆ 237 ÿ CONTINENTAL AIRPORT Å1960 Grand Parkway ÿÆ Å1960 Smithville o Humble Jefferson 159 Æ146 Kyle ÿÆ ¤£290 )"8 £59 ÿ Bellville ¤ 8 35 ") Wallisville Lake ¨¦§ ÿÆ71 Cedar Creek Reservoir (fayette) Waller Sheldon Reservoir ÿÆ21 Harris Mont Belvieu 10 La Grange Æ36 ¨¦§ ÿ Houston Lake Anahuac Canyon Lake San Marcos 142 ÿÆ Lockhart Pattison Katy Addicks Reservoir Anahuac San Felipe 10 BaytownCedar Bayou Generating Pond 124 ¨¦§ Lynchburg Reservoir Chambers ÿÆ Hunter ÿÆ80 Sealy 6 Î 95 Brookshire US 90A") Transit 99 ÿÆ Barker Reservoir ") Sa Corridor Bellaire 123 10 n Fulshear La Porte Columbus 59 ÿÆ ¨¦§ B Simonton ¤£ Pasadena Weimar e 610 HOBBY AIRPORT Schulenburg rn "99 SH a36 ) ¨¦§ ELLINGTON FIELD New Braunfels 90 rd Luling ¤£ Flatonia R Wallis B Sugar Land o Lake Dunlap iv r er er az os Riv 8 8 Orchard Richmond ")Missouri City )" o Galveston Bay 10 Pearland ÿÆ146 35 ÿÆ46 § PoEagletent Lakeial Upgrade Fort Bend ¨¦§ ¨¦ 77 Fresno Lake Mcqueeney £ Eagleof Exi Lakesting RoadwaysÆ60 US 59 to FriendswoodSH 146 League City ÿÆ87 80 ¤ ÿ 90A90 ÿÆ 183 304 ¤£ Rosenberg £90A90 ¤£ ÿÆ East Bernard Seguin ¤£ Beasley Pleak Smithers Lake 45 Gonzales Wharton Economic Development Corporation ÿÆ6 ¨¦§ US 59 Upgrade ¤£59 Galveston County Water Reservoir Lake Gonzales Proposed Overpasses at CR90A90 467, CR 961, C Fairchilds ¤£ Kendleton Alvin 197 ¤£ o Galveston 10 City of Wharton )" 108 ¨¦§ Pierce Pumping Plant Road, FM 102, FM 1301, l 288 )" o ÿÆ Brazoria Shiner Hallettsville Æ71 & W harton EDC Needville B Texas City Æ97 CR 222, CR 231, HWY 60, Ponderosa, FM 1161, ÿ r ÿ r Î a 36 d ÿÆ a CR 216, CR 214, CR 221, CR 212 o z R o Wharton i v s Î Æ95 (Resolution No. 2009-04 & 2009-60) e Mustang Lake East/ Mustang Lake West ÿ ¤£77A77 r Wharton R Galveston 87 i ÿÆ35 £ v ¤ FM 102 Extension e Port Connection S r Yoakum an Port of Houston B William Harris Reservoir Nixon East Loop e r Eagle Nest Lake/ Manor Lake to US 59S City of Wharton n Æ111 a 181 ÿ r El Campo d ¤£ R Angleton Æ97 Stockdale N i ÿ West Columbiave a r v US 59 i L d Improve FreightSan Rai Bernardl Reservoirs #1, #2, #3 87 a a ¤£ va d Floresville c from Port of Houston Brazoria Reservoir Lake Jackson Cuero a Ri Brazoria R ve to US 59 S Poth G ive r Sweeny 322 ua r Æ d ÿ a Ganado l Proposed KCS Rail Bypass Freeport Æ72 u 36 ÿ p ÿÆ e (City of El CampoÿÆ71 - 123 Æ80 Bay City Æ ÿ R Lake Texana 111 Î ÿ i Æ v Resÿolution No. R2008-13) Falls City Yorktown e SH 36 Port Gulf of Mexico r Edna 77A ÿÆ35 Nordheim ¤£77 87 Connection ¤£ ¤£59 ÿÆ172 (Freeport) Karnes City Runge 183 Victoria LaUS Ward 59/SH 111 ¤£ o US 87 Port Port Connection ÿÆ60 Kenedy (Point Comfort) Coleto Creek Power Connection ÿÆ35 South Texas Project Reservoir Transportation facilities to consider when developing (Port Lavaca) Coleto Creek Reservoir Palacios the I-69 Corridor Program as proposed by members of Æ239 ÿ Æ185 Goliad Relief Route ÿ Cox Lake/ Raw Water Lake/ Recycle Lake Goliad Î Point Comfort Corridor Segment Committee 3 San Port Lavaca (North or South) Ant Î oni Calhoun 37 Æ72 o Highway - Interstate ¨¦§ ÿ 87 ¨¦§ Potential Facility A 59 R ¤£ Port Authority ta ¤£ iv ¤£ Highway - US Marked sc e o r Planned Controlled r Access s 316 Æ e a SH 185 ÿÆ ÿ Highway - State Marked R v i Port Connection i v 181 Existing Controlled Access e Beeville Urban Area r ¤£ R 239 (Port of Victoria) Æ Relief Route ÿ s Choke Canyon Chase Field SH 99 Study Area o Reservoir 185 County River Industrial Park Exelon NuclearÆ35 Power Plant Æ z ueces ÿ ÿ ThreeN Rivers Beeville 77 Seadrift ¤£ (Planned Power Plant) Commercial Air a port 202 Austwell Railroads r ÿÆ (Possible I-69 connection o This is an updated map from the February & May Union Pacific (UP) B US 181 to and Interchange) Î Primary Deep Draft Seaport George West 2010 Corridor Segment Committee (CSC) meetings Port of Corpus Christi Refugio Kansas City Southern (KCS) Inactive M that reflects continuing CSC member input on Shallow Draft & Barge Port i s Potential Refugio Kansas City Southern (KCS) Î s identifying transportation facilities to be Brenham i Woodsboroon Relief Route R considered when developing the I-69 Corridor Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) i 359 veand Rail Bypass Program. During future CSC meetings, the CSC ÿÆ r Other Existing 281 members will continue to have the opportunity to ¤£ 3 Exits Abandoned Rail 59 Lake Corpus Christi review and make further edits to this map. WORKING ¤£ 77 Mathis ¤£ CSC Identified Facilities DRAFT Bayside Fulton Please note that the purpose of collecting this Pernitas Point I-69 Corridor PublProgramic Lands Facility Sinton information was to gather ideas from the 5 37 Rockport ¨¦§ individual Committee members. These maps I-69 Corridor Program Connecting Facility 0 7.5 15 30 Taft San Patricio do not represent the recommendations of Potential Relief Route Orange Grove ÿÆ35 Miles 181 Gregory CSC or TxDOT. I-69 Corridor Program Rail Facility Edroy Odem ¤£ Aransas Pass 1 Inch = 15 Miles 7/19/2010 Î o.
Recommended publications
  • River Run Fall 2017

    River Run Fall 2017

    A Publication of the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority Fall 2017 3 / Hydro Repairs Underway 8 / Zebra Mussels 16 / Grant Helps SOLC Constituent Communiqué Building Relationships In its 10-county statutory district, the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority works with a variety of customers for water sales and treatment, wastewater treatment, power sales, recreational undertakings and other services. In conducting those operations, GBRA staff also work closely with elected officials, developers and other constituents to determine their current and future needs and to see how GBRA can help address those needs. The purpose of our efforts is to provide exceptional service for their benefit. We are able to do this by ensuring that GBRA has highly skilled employees who receive relevant training year round. This also includes state licensed operators for the water and wastewater treatment facilities that we own and Ithose that we operate in partnership with customers in our basin. Today, GBRA continues to nurture long-standing relationships with its current customers while building new relationships with new partners. Furthering existing partnerships and addressing a need for a geographic area that lacks certain utilities, GBRA is securing a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) to provide wastewater services to an unincorporated area between New Braunfels and Seguin. GBRA will work in partnership with New Braunfels Utilities and the city of Seguin to provide wholesale wastewater treatment to wastewater that is collected from the new developments that are occurring in this high growth area. GBRA is stepping up to build these relationships because the area is growing and circumstances demand it.
  • Hunting & Fishing Regulations H

    Hunting & Fishing Regulations H

    2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 Hunting & Fishing Regulations Regulations Regulations Fishing Fishing & & Hunting Hunting Hunting & Fishing Regulations FISHING FOR A RECORD RECORD A FOR FISHING FISHING FOR A RECORD BY AUBRY BUZEK BUZEK AUBRY BY BY AUBRY BUZEK ENTER OUR SWEEPSTAKES SWEEPSTAKES OUR ENTER ENTER OUR SWEEPSTAKES PAGE 102 102 PAGE PAGE 102 2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE WILDLIFE WILDLIFE & & PARKS PARKS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE OUTDOOROUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOROUTDOOR 6/15/17 4:14 PM 4:14 6/15/17 Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app OutdoorAnnual.com/app App Mobile the 1 Download OA-2017_AC.indd Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app 6/15/17 4:12 PM 4:12 6/15/17 1 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM 6/15/17 4:12 PM 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 ANNUALANNANNUAL AL U ANN ANN ANN ANN ANN ANNUAL ANN ANN ANN ANNUALANNANNUAL AL U ANN ANN ANN ANN ANN ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUALANN ANNUALANN ANN ANN ANN 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM PM 4:12 6/15/17 ANNUAL 1 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM Download the Mobile App Mobile the Download Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app OutdoorAnnual.com/app OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE WILDLIFE WILDLIFE & & PARKS
  • East Central Plains (Post Oak Savanna)

    East Central Plains (Post Oak Savanna)

    TEXAS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN East Central Texas Plains (Post Oak Savanna) ECOREGION HANDBOOK August 2012 Citing this document: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2012. Texas Conservation Action Plan 2012 – 2016: East Central Texas Plains Handbook. Editor, Wendy Connally, Texas Conservation Action Plan Coordinator. Austin, Texas. Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 HOW TO GET INVOLVED ............................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 RARE SPECIES and COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................. 13 PRIORITY HABITATS ..................................................................................................................................... 13 ISSUES ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 CONSERVATION ACTIONS ........................................................................................................................... 28 ECOREGION HANDBOOK FIGURES Figure 1. ECPL Ecoregion with County Boundaries ......................................................................................
  • Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use In

    Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use In

    CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Major Subject: Geography CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Jonathan M. Smith Committee Members, Peter J. Hugill Christian Brannstrom Bradford P. Wilcox Head of Department, Douglas J. Sherman May 2007 Major Subject: Geography iii ABSTRACT Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use in East Central Texas Since the Time of Anglo Settlement. (May 2007) Wendy Winborn Patzewitsch, B.A., Trinity University; M.S., Southern Methodist University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Jonathan M. Smith Patterns and perceptions of water use have changed since Anglo settlement in Texas in the early nineteenth century. Change has not been constant, gradual, or linear, but rather has occurred in fits and spurts. This pattern of punctuated equilibrium in water use regimes is the central finding of this dissertation. Water use is examined in terms of built, organizational, and institutional inertias that resist change in the cultural landscape. Change occurs only when forced by crisis and results in water management at an increasing scale. Perception is critical in forcing response to crisis.
  • Distributional Surveys of Freshwater Bivalves in Texas: Progress Report for 1997

    Distributional Surveys of Freshwater Bivalves in Texas: Progress Report for 1997

    DISTRIBUTIONAL SURVEYS OF FRESHWATER BIVALVES IN TEXAS: PROGRESS REPORT FOR 1997 by Robert G. Howells MANAGEMENT DATA SERIES No. 147 1998 Texas Parks and Wildlife Depar1ment Inland Fisheries Division 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many biologists and technicians with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's Inland Fisheries Research and Management offices assisted with SW"Veys and collectons of freshwater mussels. Thanks also go to Pam Balcer (Kerrville, Texas) and Sue Martin (San Angelo; Texas) who assised extensively with collection of specimens and Jesse Todd (Dallas, Texas), Dr. Charles Mather (University of Arts and Science, Chickasha, Oklahoma) and J.A.M. Bergmann (Boerne, Texas) who provided specimens and field data. ABSTRACT During 1997, over 1,500 unionid specimens were docwnented from 87 locations (I 06 sample sites) statewide in Texas where specimens were either directly surveyed by the Heart of the Hills Research Station (HOH) staff or were sent to HOH by volunteers. Living specimens or recently-dead shells were found at 59% of the locations, 14% yielded only Jong-dead or subfossil shells, 24% produced no unionids or their remains, and 3% could not be accessed due to private lands or other local site problems which precluded sampling. Jn conjunction with previous field-survey work J 992-1996, unionids appear completely or almost completely extirpated from the Pedernales, Blanco, San Marcos, Llano, Medina, upper Guadalupe, upper Sulphur, areas of the San Jacinto, and much of the San Saba rivers. Sections of other river systems and many tributaries have also experienced major unionid population losses in recent years.
  • 2011-2012 Hunting Seasons

    2011-2012 Hunting Seasons

    2011–2012 Hunting Seasons In addition to a hunting license, a migratory game bird stamp endorsement ($7) is required to hunt any migratory game bird, including mourning dove (a Federal Sandhill Crane Permit also is required to hunt sandhill crane). An upland game bird stamp endorsement ($7) is required to hunt turkey, quail, pheasant, lesser prairie chicken, or chachalacas. See County Listings for specific county regulations. ALLIGATOR 22 counties & special properties (by permit only) Sept. 10–30 Remainder of the state (see pg. 66) Apr. 1 – June 30 PRONGHORN ANTELOPE By permit only Oct. 1–9 DOVE (PLease Report Leg bandS to 1-800-327-BAND) North Zone and Central Zone Sept. 1 – Oct. 23, dec. 23 – Jan. 8 South Zone Sept. 23 – Oct. 30, dec. 23 – Jan. 23 Special White-winged dove Area Sept. 3, 4, 10 & 11, Sept. 23 – Oct. 30, dec. 23 – Jan.19 EARLY TEAL-ONLY Statewide (all counties) Sept. 10 – 25 CANADA GOOSE-ONLY East Zone Only Sept. 10 – 25 WHITE-TAILED DEER Archery-Only Season Oct. 1 – nov. 4 General Season: *Special Youth Season Oct. 29–30, Jan. 2–15 North Texas (209 counties) nov. 5 – Jan. 1 South Texas (30 counties) nov. 5 – Jan. 15 Late Antlerless and Spike: North Texas (106 counties) Jan. 2–15 South Texas (30 counties) Jan. 16–29 Muzzleloader (57 counties) Jan. 2–15 MULE DEER Archery-Only Season Oct. 1 – nov. 4 General Season: Panhandle (38 counties) nov. 19 – dec. 4 SW Panhandle (10 counties) nov. 19–27 Trans-Pecos (19 counties) nov. 25 – dec. 11 JAVELINA (43 counties) Oct.
  • Gonzales Project FERC Project No

    Gonzales Project FERC Project No

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Gonzales Project FERC Project No. 2960-006 Texas Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Application .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need For Power ........................................................ 1 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................ 1 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................ 3 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements ....................................................... 3 1.3.1 Federal Power Act ........................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Clean Water Act .............................................................................. 4 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act .................................................................. 4 1.3.4 Coastal Zone Management Act ....................................................... 4 1.3.5 National Historic Preservation Act .................................................. 5 1.4 Public Review and Comment ........................................................................ 6 1.4.1 Scoping ...........................................................................................
  • R November, 1994

    R November, 1994

    3 r November, 1994 TRANS-TEXAS WATER PROGRAM WEST CENTRAL STUDY AREA PHASE I INTERIM REPORT VOLUME3 Prepared for San Antonio River Authority San Antonio Water System Edwards Underground Water District Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority Lower Colorado River Authority Bexar Metropolitan Water District Nueces River Authority Texas Water Development Board by HDR Engineering, Inc. in association with Paul Price Associates, Inc. LBG-Guyton Associates Espey-Huston & Associates, Inc. November, 1994 TRANS-TEXAS WATER PROGRAM WEST CENTRAL STUDY AREA PHASE I INTERIM REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Section Page ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION . 1-1 1.1 Study Area . 1-2 1.2 Objectives . 1-5 2.0 POPULATION, WATER DEMAND AND WATER SUPPLY PROJECTIONS . 2-1 2.1 Population Projections . 2-1 2.2 Water Demand Projections ................................ 2-16 2.3 Water Supply Projections .................................. 2-84 2.4 Water Demand and Supply Comparisons ...................... 2-96 VOLUME 2 3.0 WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES AND EVALUATIONS .............. 3-1 3.0.1 Environmental Overview . 3-7 3.0.2 Cost Estimating Procedures ................................ 3-47 Conservation / Local Alternatives 3.1 Demand Reduction (L-10) ................................. 3-57 3.2 Exchange Reclaimed Water for Edwards Irrigation Water (L-11) .... 3-73 3.3 Exchange Reclaimed Water for BMA Medina Lake Water (L-12) ... 3-91 3.4 Reclaimed Water Reuse (L-13) ............................ 3-105 3.5 Transfer of Reclaimed Water to Corpus Christi Through Choke Canyon Reservoir (L-14) ................................. 3-117 3.6 Purchase (or Lease) of Edwards Irrigation Water for Municipal and Industrial Use (L-15) .................................... 3-127 3.7 Demineralization of Edwards "Bad Water" (L-16) .............
  • Fly the Wind

    Fly the Wind

    ADVENTURE Port Isabel: * April 28, 2006 Texas’ Premier Outdoor Newspaper Volume 2, Issue 17 * angler’s paradise www.lonestaroutdoornews.com See Page 19 INSIDE HUNTING Check grandpa’s attic Trophy found in field or even on a saloon wall could make record books By Wes Smalling The record books of the Boone and the hunter, said Jack Reneau, Crockett Club have categories that go Boone and Crockett’s director of big beyond your typical category of trophies game records. Texas state That giant whitetail mount you spotted bagged during hunting season. The club “Rather than recording egos and record at a neighborhood garage sale or gathering also lists records for “picked up” trophies stuff like that, what we’re recording is non-typical dust in an attic could turn out to be more and for mounts of unknown origin. the success of conservation efforts,” whitetail taken than just treasure. The reason for the categories is because Reneau said. in 1892, by an It might just win you a world record. the club’s emphasis is on the animal not See PICKUPS, Page 11 unknown hunter. Game management and selective breeding isn’t new for deer, but now one Texas rancher is doing Changes the same for hogs as a way for landowners to improve their stock of trophy wild hogs. in weather Fly See Page 6 Wildfires in the Panhandle killed suit bass 12 people and destroyed almost a million acres, but wildlife the specialists say there may be a just fine silver lining for game animals. By Mary See Page 6 Helen Aguirre FISHING wind Spoiling for a fight? This is the time of the year along Texas’ Blame the near-shore Gulf waters to find big bass in Don’t let coastal the rambunctious jack crevalle Texas on El Niño.
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Streamflow Gains and Losses for Selected Stream Reaches in the Lower Guadalupe River Basin, Texas, 2010–12

    A Preliminary Assessment of Streamflow Gains and Losses for Selected Stream Reaches in the Lower Guadalupe River Basin, Texas, 2010–12

    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers–Fort Worth District, the Texas Water Development Board, the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, and the Edwards Aquifer Authority A Preliminary Assessment of Streamflow Gains and Losses for Selected Stream Reaches in the Lower Guadalupe River Basin, Texas, 2010–12 Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5209 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover, Photograph looking downstream from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow-gaging station 08169840 Guadalupe River at Oak Forest, Texas, August 9, 2011. Photograph by Mark A. Warzecha, USGS. A Preliminary Assessment of Streamflow Gains and Losses for Selected Stream Reaches in the Lower Guadalupe River Basin, Texas, 2010–12 By Loren L. Wehmeyer, Karl E. Winters, and Darwin J. Ockerman Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers–Fort Worth District, the Texas Water Development Board, the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, and the Edwards Aquifer Authority Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5209 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • Coleto Creek Reservoir 2016 Survey Report

    Coleto Creek Reservoir 2016 Survey Report

    PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required by FEDERAL AID IN SPORT FISH RESTORATION ACT TEXAS FEDERAL AID PROJECT F-221-M-2 INLAND FISHERIES DIVISION MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2016 Fisheries Management Survey Report Coleto Creek Reservoir Prepared by: Greg Binion, District Management Supervisor and Dusty McDonald, Assistant District Management Supervisor Inland Fisheries Division Corpus Christi District Mathis, Texas Carter Smith Executive Director Craig Bonds Director, Inland Fisheries July 31, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Survey and Management Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 2 Reservoir Description .................................................................................................................................... 2 Angler Access ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Management History ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................................
  • Victoria County Station ESP, Environmental Rpt, Rev. 1

    Victoria County Station ESP, Environmental Rpt, Rev. 1

    Victoria County Station ESP Application Part 3 — Environmental Report Section 2.3 Table of Contents Section Title Page 2.3 Water ...................................................................................................................... 2.3-1 2.3.1 Hydrology ........................................................................................................... 2.3-1 2.3.1.1 Surface Water ......................................................................................... 2.3-2 2.3.1.2 Groundwater ......................................................................................... 2.3-40 2.3.2 Water Use ...................................................................................................... 2.3-139 2.3.2.1 Water Resources Planning and Appropriation .................................... 2.3-139 2.3.2.2 Groundwater Use ................................................................................ 2.3-141 2.3.2.3 Surface Water Use .............................................................................. 2.3-145 2.3.2.4 References .......................................................................................... 2.3-153 2.3.3 Water Quality ................................................................................................. 2.3-178 2.3.3.1 Groundwater ....................................................................................... 2.3-178 2.3.3.2 Surface Water .................................................................................... 2.3-180 2.3.3.3 References