DOCSLIB.ORG

“No Homo Promo”: American Hypocrisy and LGBT Rights in Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“No Homo Promo”: American Hypocrisy and LGBT Rights in Russia “No Homo Promo”: American Hypocrisy and LGBT Rights in Russia Source: ESPN As the images of medal winning performances in Sochi fade in to memories, the Russian Olympic team continues to celebrate their esteemed position as the winner of the most gold medals and tops the total medal count. However, this high level of athleticism during the 2014 Olympics does little to improve Russia’s image which has been marred by political contention. The international condemnation in question arose from numerous state and non-state actors in reaction to Russia’s 2013 policy known colloquially as the Russian anti-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) law; the new law prohibits the dissemination of information to minors about non-traditional sexual relationships, publically speaking in favor of non- traditional relationships, and carrying out any public support or rallies for LBGT rights. This law, passed unanimously by the Russian Duma with the expressed support of President Vladimir Putin, extends across the Russian state, and is in line with policies already put into effect by many regional governments. Criticism of the oppressive law has been amplified within the international community by Russia’s hosting of the 2014 Olympic Winter Games, yet few realize that the polices they now condemn in Russia are almost identical to those in effect in Utah during the 2002 Games in Salt Lake City. At the time of the Salt Lake City Games, the state of Utah was one of eight states to have anti-LGBT propaganda laws on the books similar to the Russian laws currently causing controversy. What is more, in 1993 the Russian Federation decriminalized LGBT relationships while the United States Supreme Court did not officially rule on this until 2003, when it struck down a Texas law that made LGBT relationships illegal in the court case Lawrence v. Texas. When the United States hosted the Olympics in 2002, there were more draconian laws on the books in parts of the country than in Russia today. Eight states (Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina) have laws currently on the books, often referred to as ‘No Homo Promo’ laws. Similar to the Russian law, these statutes were intended to protect minors from neutral information and any positive portrayal of LGBT lives. However, there are marked differences between the Russian and American laws. Most notably, the Russian laws were passed by the highest legislative assembly in Russia, the | 1 “No Homo Promo”: American Hypocrisy and LGBT Rights in Russia Duma, whereas the laws in the United States were passed on a state level. This is a salient difference because the laws are not broadly applicable in the United States, and individual liberty has the opportunity to be protected by the federal government. Additionally, the laws in Russia are applied to an individual’s right to express support for the LBGT community, while the US laws are targeted at educational policy. (AP Photo/Morry Gash) Also of note is the enforcement of the laws in the United States with little recourse, violent or otherwise, for those considered to be ‘in violation’ of the law. This is juxtaposed with many accounts of arrests and suppression in Russia, most notably the public whipping of peaceful protestors from the band Pussy Riot in Sochi during the second week of the Games. While the United States condemnation of Russia’s LBGT policies could be considered hypocritical, it marks a significant change in American attitudes towards progressive policies. While LGBT rights in Russia are trending downward, the opposite can be said of LGBT rights in the US. With swelling grassroots support for marriage equality being validated in the appellate court systems, it seems that the United States is moving toward an unprecedented level of support of marital rights for its LGBT citizens. Sadly, the same cannot be said for Russia Now that the games in Sochi are coming to a close, it is important to still stand with Russia’s LBGT community. While the the pursuit of Olympic glory ends, the fight for LBGT equality in Russia is just beginning. Caitlin Handerhan, MPA '15 Caitlin Handerhan '15 is a fellow at the Cornell Institute for Public Affairs. While pursuing her master's degree at Cornell, Caitlin is concentrating her studies on human rights and | 2 “No Homo Promo”: American Hypocrisy and LGBT Rights in Russia social justice. A 2013 graduate of Mercyhurst University, she holds a bachelor's degree in Political Science. View all posts | 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Ethnographic Account of Disability and Globalization in Contemporary Russia
    INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ACCOUNT OF DISABILITY AND GLOBALIZATION IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIA Cassandra Hartblay A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2015 ! ! ! ! Approved by: Michele Rivkin-Fish Arturo Escobar Sue Estroff Jocelyn Chua Robert McRuer © 2015 Cassandra Hartblay ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ! ii! ABSTRACT Cassandra Hartblay: Inaccessible Accessibility: An Ethnographic Account Of Disability And Globalization In Contemporary Russia (Under the Direction of Michele Rivkin-Fish) Based on over twelve months of fieldwork in Russia, this dissertation explores what an ethnographic approach offers disability studies as a global, interdisciplinary, justice-oriented field. Focused on the personal, embodied narratives and experiences of five adults with mobility impairments in the regional capital city of Petrozavodsk, the dissertation draws on methods including participant observation, ethnographic interviews, performance ethnography, and analysis of public documents and popular media to trace the ways in which the category of disability is reproduced, stigmatized, and made meaningful in a contemporary postsoviet urban context. In tracing the ways in which concepts of disability and accessibility move transnational and transculturally as part of global expert cultures, I argue that Russian adults with disabilities expertly negotiate multiple modes of understanding disability, including historically and culturally rooted social stigma; psychosocial, therapeutic, or medicalized approaches; and democratic minority group citizenship. Considering the array of colloquial Russian terms that my interlocutors used to discuss issues of access and inaccess in informal settings, and their cultural antecedents, I suggest that the postsoviet infrastructural milieu is frequently posited as always opposed to development and European modernity.
    [Show full text]
  • LEVELS of GENERALITY and the PROTECTION of LGBT RIGHTS BEFORE the UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY Anthony S. Winert
    LEVELS OF GENERALITY AND THE PROTECTION OF LGBT RIGHTS BEFORE THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY Anthony S. Winert I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 81 II. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS ................................. 82 A. The Position of the GeneralAssembly in the United N ations .......................................................................... 83 B. The Record of GeneralAssembly Resolutions in Advancing H um an Rights................................................................. 86 III. THE POWER OF LEVELS OF GENERALITY .................................. 91 A. Levels of GeneralityDescribing Rights................................... 92 B. United States Supreme Court Perspective on Levels of Generality ...................................................................... 93 C. A Prominent Illustrationfor the Importance of Levels of Generality ...................................................................... 96 D. A Variant-FormSense of Generality ................................. 99 IV. LEVELS OF GENERALITY AND THE INTERNATIONAL ADVANCEMENT OF LGBT RIGHTS .......................................... 100 A. Key Recent Developments ................................................... 101 B. The Yogyakarta Principles................................................. 102 C. The United Nations High Commissionerfor Human Rights ............................................................................... 104 1. Office of
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Russia: Challenges in the 21St Century ICRP Human Rights Issues Series | 2014
    Institute for Cultural Relations Policy Human Rights Issues Series | 2014 ICRP Human Rights Issues Series | 2014 Human rights in Russia: Challenges in the 21st century ICRP Human Rights Issues Series | 2014 Human rights in Russia: Challenges in the 21st century Author | Marija Petrović Series Editor | András Lőrincz Published by | Institute for Cultural Relations Policy Executive Publisher | Csilla Morauszki ICRP Geopolitika Kft., 1131 Budapest, Gyöngyösi u. 45. http://culturalrelations.org [email protected] HU ISSN 2064-2202 Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 2 Human rights in the Soviet Union 3 Laws and conventions on human rights 5 Juridical system of Russia 6 Human rights policy of the Putin regime 8 Corruption 10 Freedom of press and suspicious death cases 13 Foreign agent law 18 The homosexual question 20 Greenpeace activists arrested 24 Xenophobia 27 North Caucasus 31 The Sochi Olympics 36 10 facts about Russia’s human rights situation 40 For further information 41 Human rights in Russia: Challenges in the 21st century Human rights in Russia: Challenges in the 21st century Foreword Before presenting the human rights situation in Russia, it is important to note that the Institute for Cultural Relations Policy is a politically independent organisation. This essay was not created for condemning, nor for supporting the views of any country or political party. The only aim is to give a better understanding on the topic. On the next pages the most important and mainly most current aspects of the issue are examined, presenting the history and the present of the human rights situation in the Soviet Union and in Russia, including international opinions as well.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sochi Olympics, Celebration Capitalism and Homonationalist Pride1
    1 The Sochi Olympics, celebration capitalism and homonationalist pride1 Ann Travers and Mary Shearman Simon Fraser University In July 2013 the Russian government passed two anti-LGBT laws that drew international criticism. Russia’s impending hosting of the 2014 Winter Olympic Games inspired more sustained international attention to these laws than might have otherwise been the case. In this article, we apply the mutually supporting frameworks of queer/trans necropolitics and celebration capitalism to a content analysis of coverage of the Sochi Olympics in the Advocate and Xtra, the leading LGBT publications in the United States and Canada respectively. We contend that the Advocate and Xtra participated in a homonationalist process of manufacturing consent as the USA, Canada, the West in general and the Olympic Games were glorified while issues relating to racism and colonialism in Russia, the USA and Canada were ignored and these geopolitical formations in general were falsely generalized as safe havens for LGBT people. This conclusion is based on two key observations. First, we noted complete silence about racist and ethnic violence in Russia and in the specific site of Sochi in the Advocate and only one (unelaborated) acknowledgement of Sochi as a historical site of ethnic cleansing in Xtra. Second, in spite of the recent expansion of formal citizenship rights for LGBT people, more uniformly in Canada than in the USA, Advocate and Xtra coverage failed to acknowledge the dissonance between American and Canadian governments positioning themselves as LGBT and human rights leaders and the harm these National Security States continue to deliver to racialized, impoverished and gender and sexual minority populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Persecution of Sexual Minorities in Russia
    Persecution of sexual minorities in Russia Standard Note: SNIA/6712 Last updated: 21 August 2013 Author: Ben Smith Section International Affairs and Defence Section Recent Russian legislation prohibiting ‘propaganda’ to minors in favour of non-traditional sexual relationships has alarmed human rights advocates and seems to have provoked an increase in violence against sexual minorities. The UK government has stated its clear opposition to the law and the climate of hostility towards LGBT people that prevails in Russia. Contents 1 Increasing official hostility 2 1.1 Parade bans 2 1.2 Propaganda law 2 1.3 NGO law 3 1.4 Adoption 3 2 Winter Olympics 3 3 International organisations 5 3.1 United Nations 5 3.2 Council of Europe 5 3.3 European Parliament 6 4 Russian viewpoints 6 5 UK policy 8 1 Increasing official hostility The situation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in Russia has become increasingly difficult over the last few years, although much of the basic legal framework for LGBT people is not obviously discriminatory. Sexual relations between men were decriminalised in 1993 and the law is silent on the issue of sex between women. The age of consent for homosexuals is the same as that for heterosexuals, and although there is no provision for same-sex marriages or civil partnerships. Homosexuals are not prevented by law from serving in the armed forces, although the position is ambiguous. The political atmosphere is deeply hostile, however. In May 2013, the International Lesbian and Gay Association-Europe rated Russia the worst place to be gay out of 49 European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text (Pdf)
    FEMINIST ENCOUNTERS A JOURNAL OF CRITICAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POLITICS e-ISSN: 2542-4920 Volume 2, Issue 1 (Spring 2018) Editor-in-Chief Sally R. Munt Sussex Centre for Cultural Studies, University of Sussex (UK) Guest Editors Srimati Basu University of Kentucky (USA) Akiko Takenaka University of Kentucky (USA) This page intentionally left blank. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 1(1) ISSN: 2542-4920 CHIEF EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION FEMINIST ENCOUNTERS: A JOURNAL OF CRITICAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POLITICS Founded in 2017, Feminist Encounters is a journal committed to argument and debate, in the tradition of historical feminist movements. In the wake of the growing rise of the Right across the world, openly neo-fascist national sentiments, and rising conservative populism, we feminists all over the world are needing to remobilise our energies to protect and advance gender rights. Feminist Encounters provides a forum for feminist theorists, scholars, and activists to communicate with each other, to better educate ourselves on international issues and thus promote more global understanding, and to enhance our critical tools for fighting for human rights. Feminism is an intellectual apparatus, a political agenda, and a programme for social change. Critical analysis of how gender discourses produce cultural identities and social practices within diverse lived realities is key to this change. We need to think more sharply in order to strategise well: as the discourses of conservatism renew and invigorate themselves, so we as feminist scholars need to be refining our amazonic swords in order not just to respond effectively but also to innovate our own ideas for equality and social justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Gay Pride & the Russian Tradition An
    Sexual Equality in Russia: Reconciling Gay Pride & The Russian Tradition An Honors Thesis for the Department of German, Russian & Asian Languages and Literature Lilia Tuckerman Carey Tufts University, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Literary Sources 4 Historical Background 13 Proponents 17 Opposition 28 At Present 35 Looking Forward 45 Notes 48 Works Referenced 52 ii INTRODUCTION AND LITERARY SOURCES The purpose of this thesis is to examine the present state of Russia’s gay pride movement. In particular, this study will focus on why schisms within Russia’s gay community are preventing campaigns for gay pride from reaching their goal of greater social and legal equality. An evaluation of the actions and beliefs of different factions of Russian society help to provide answers to this question. The study also gauges the desire of LGBT Russians to have a successful gay pride movement, and what the definition of ‘success’ is in the Russian context. This definition is elucidated by a discussion of the applicability of Western examples of gay pride to the Russian case. The scope of the study spans the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 to the present date. This thesis is designed to portray Russia’s gay pride movement at present by assessing past research on the movement’s development, addressing current events as they unfold, and making predictions and suggestions for the future. What I term “current events” dates from September 2011 to April 2012, or the period during which I was engaged in writing and researching this thesis. The brief time frame of this study means that it provides an abbreviated account of the nature of Russia’s gay pride movement as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Democrats' Stance on the LGBT Community
    Russian Democrats’ Stance on the LGBT Community: An Attitudinal Shift Written by Artem Patalakh Russian Democrats’ Stance on the LGBT Community: An Attitudinal Shift https://www.e-ir.info/2020/05/11/russian-democrats-stance-on-the-lgbt-community-an-attitudinal-shift/ ARTEM PATALAKH, MAY 11 2020 One normally expects to read about appalling incidents or oppressive measures when seeing the words ‘LGBT’ and ‘Russia’ in one headline. Chechen anti-gay purges, the spread of gay hunting communities, the censorship of gay scenes and characters in movies, the 2013 ‘gay propaganda’ ban – this is hardly a complete list of what makes Russia one of the least LGBT friendly places in Europe; ranking higher than only Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey in the Rainbow Index. Nonetheless, there is an encouraging – and seemingly under-discussed – a political trend which might fail to reverse the unfavorable status quo today, but it lays the foundation for future progress in this regard: the increasing adoption and support of the LGBT agenda by the Russian democratic opposition. Changing Political Trend Before Putin’s third term, the LGBT community was largely neglected or denounced by Russian democrats. As the founder of Moscow pride Nikolai Alexeev said in 2010: a phobia of homosexuality is, unfortunately, peculiar not only to the Russian authorities, but also the Russian opposition and Russian human rights activists, that is, the people who are supposed to fight for the rights of all citizens. Indeed, in 2010, the late opposition leader Boris Nemtsov offered to arrange and lead a straight pride parade to make the gay pride parade which, in his view advocated ‘a provocative standpoint,’ ‘look like a comedy.’ At a meeting of the liberal Solidarnost movement, the people who rose a rainbow flag were labelled ‘provocateurs’ and expelled.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Protection of Sexual Minorities in International Criminal Law
    RUSSIAN LAW JOURNAL Volume VI (2018) Issue 1 LEGAL PROTECTION OF SEXUAL MINORITIES IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW NEVENKA ĐURIĆ, Washington College of Law (Washington, USA) SUNČANA ROKSANDIĆ VIDLIČKA, University of Zagreb (Zagreb, Croatia) GLEB BOGUSH, Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia) DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2018-6-1-28-57 For a long time, the issues of sexual orientation and gender identity have been restrained from entering the legal arena as being regarded as too radical. In today’s society, these issues warrant consideration in the context of international criminal law. Critically reflecting on the way of placing these grounds within the international criminal law framework, this paper tries to unpack the sheer possibility of addressing them within the core international crimes. Correctly defining terms such as “sexual orientation” and “gender” is not only germane, but also necessary for international criminal law to tackle them accordingly. By doing so, the power of legal argumentation in international criminal law for protecting sexual minorities is strengthened, but its boundaries and vulnerabilities are also exposed. This paper proposes that the described massive violation of the most fundamental human rights should be legally qualified as persecution. For protecting sexual minorities on an international criminal law scale, it is argued that we are not really “there” yet, but we might just be on the right track. Keywords: sexual orientation; LGBT; gender; international criminal law; Rome Statute; human rights; crimes against humanity. Recommended citation: Nevenka Đurić et al., Legal Protection of Sexual Minorities in International Criminal Law, 6(1) Russian Law Journal 28–57 (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Queer Identity and Socialist Realism: the Censorship of Queer Art and Life Under Stalin and Beyond
    Queer Identity and Socialist Realism: The Censorship of Queer Art and Life Under Stalin and Beyond Taylor G. Mitchell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS WITH HONORS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN April 4, 2016 Advised by Professor Valerie Kivelson For 410 and B Even if you weren’t always there we made it through TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................ i Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Chapter One: Socialist Realism .................................................................... 12 Chapter Two: Nikolai Gogol .......................................................................... 35 Chapter Three: Pyotr Tchaikovsky ............................................................... 56 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 79 Epilogue .......................................................................................................... 84 Bibliography .................................................................................................... 89 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I, of course, first have to thank my advisor, Valerie Kivelson, and the head of the Honors program, John Carson, for putting up with me. I didn’t meet many deadlines, and I occasionally lost touch for long periods of time, but no matter what happened to me Valerie
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Or Expression
    Country Policy and Information Note Russia: Sexual orientation and gender identity or expression Version 1.0 November 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules x The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nikolay Viktorovich BAYEV and Two Other Applicants V
    Nikolay Viktorovich BAYEV and two other applicants v. Russia (Application Nos: 67667/09, 44092/12, 56717/12) Written Submissions by “Coming Out”, the Russian LGBT Network and ILGA-Europe _______________________________________________________________ I INTRODUCTION 1. These written comments are submitted pursuant to leave granted by the President of the Chamber in accordance with Rule 44 ¶ 3 of the Rules of the Court. The co-intervenors’ interest and expertise are set out in their application for leave to submit written comments of 28 December 2013. 2. The present cases arise from the prosecution of three individuals under legislation adopted respectively by the Ryazan Region Duma, the Arkhangelsk Regional Assembly, and the St Petersburg Legislative Assembly. The Ryazan and Arkhangelsk legislation prohibits propaganda of homosexuality among minors, while the St Petersburg legislation also penalises propaganda of bisexuality and transgender identity among minors. 3. The purpose of these comments is to assist the Court by providing information on: The practical consequences of the introduction of so-called "propaganda of homosexuality" laws for lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) persons; Why it is contrary to the best interests of the child for minors to be shielded from age-appropriate information on sexual orientation and gender identity. 4. Section II sets out the background to the introduction of these laws, and their consequences for LGBT persons in Russia. Section III shows how a homophobic and transphobic environment is detrimental to children, whether they identify as LGBT or not, and demonstrates that recognised best practice for addressing the consequences is dependent on the provision to minors of information about sexual orientation and gender identity.
    [Show full text]