Report to the Community for Fiscal Year 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report to the Community for Fiscal Year 2011 Success and a Scooter For nearly six months, CCR’s Homeless Child Care staff member Terrie had the privilege of working with a single mom who has two busy and beautiful daughters under the age of five. Terrie met ‘Sarah’ in a confidential domestic violence program where, because of a “no guest policy and confidentiality”, she lost the supports that had made her life work in the past. Sarah had a worsening genetic condition that has made mobility very difficult for her. She was walking with a cane when Terrie met her and was having trouble going up and down stairs much less consider taking a bus to get to child- care. Terrie went to work and identified a provider who could offer transportation, meet the early learning needs of the children and be counted on to maintain a high level of confidentiality. Terrie secured DSHS child care funding so Sarah could get to her domestic violence counseling, legal and medical ap- pointments. Terrie then turned her attention to meeting the family’s need of applying for Social Security benefits. When Sarah received her Social Security benefit, though, DSHS unexpectedly discontinued her cash benefits and her state childcare subsidy. CCR’s Homeless Program stepped in to pay for three full days and two part days of care each week for over three months, giving the family time to work out their next steps. During this time Sarah obtained an electric scooter to help her get around and she has used some of the time the chil- dren were in care to learn how to maneuver it safely. We are happy to say that her children continue to get door to door transportation from the family child care Terrie connected her with. Terrie’s working with her shelter advocates to figure out next steps for maintaining childcare for her children. CCR was able to direct Sarah to a community college that offers basic education and training opportunities (including a childcare subsidy). One day, around 4 pm, Terrie called to check in. Sarah said she was unable to talk because she was out in the little park near her housing program on her scooter watching her children play and enjoy the late afternoon sun. What a sweet image! Report to the Community for fiscal year 2011 It is during the really challenging times that non profits need to clarify their strategy and to stay focused on their mission. We are happy to report to you, our supporters, that Child Care Resources did just that in 2011. The recession put Child Care Resources (CCR) in the middle of a squeeze play between serving the increasing needs of families and providers and the reality of the economic impact on every sector that supports our work: government, foundations, corporations and individual supporters. The CCR Board decided that, despite funding challenges, this was the right time to take a fresh look at CCR’s strategic plan; to build on the organization’s strengths and position CCR to achieve our vision: every child has a great start in school and in life. In August, CCR embarked on a strategic planning process to support the organization in growing and moving forward with thought- fulness and innovation. A strategic planning committee comprised of members of the Board of Directors and Staff utilized a new form of strategic planning that resulted in a more flexible, real time strategic planning and ongoing monitoring process. Once data was gathered from a wide range of stakeholders, and a competitive analysis was complete, we developed an identity statement and strategy screen for the organization. We also identified the Big Question on the horizon that the organization needed to address; “How does CCR define and fulfill its unique contribution as a leader in the Washington State Early Learning community?” Although we know our work is vital for families and children, we needed to clarify our role as an organization while framing our strategies moving forward. CCR delivers programs and advocates for policy – both independently and in collaboration with partners – that increases the ability of families, caregivers, and providers to nurture the social emotional, physical, and intellectual growth of young children. CCR exercises leadership in the early learning community using our competitive advantages of: field expertise and cultural compe- tence that allows us to play a translator role between caregivers and policy makers; and our ability to leverage our expertise and data in a responsive way to inform decision-making. We have a diverse funding strategy, which prioritizes an increase in earned income and individual support reducing our reliance on government/public funding. With your support we have continued to define and fulfill CCR’s unique contribution as a leader in the Washington State Early Learning community with a King County focus. With deep appreciation, Laura Midgley Deeann Burtch Puffert Board President Chief Executive Officer CCR delivers programs that increase the ability of families, caregivers, and providers to nurture the social emotional, physical, and intellectual growth of young children. Resources for Families Through our CHILD CARE INFORMATION, REFERRAL and CONSUMER EDUCATION SERVICES, we helped over 7,000 families in 2011 (and over 150,000 families since 1990) identify and select quality child care. We emphasize support for families with low income. Starting July 2012 we provide this service statewide. Staff assesses the child care needs of families, in the language they prefer to use; provide referrals to appropriate child care providers and other community resources that enable them to access child care; and provide education about quality child care. Parents may also access the database, resource information and educational materials online. Research clearly demonstrates that the first five years are critical in shaping a child's life. Brain development is most intense from birth to 3 years of age and is compromised when children are not in settings – either at home or in out-of-home care – that positively support their cognitive and social-emotional development. Currently 60 percent of mothers with children birth to three and 75 percent of mothers with older children are in the workforce, making affordable, quality child care a critical necessity for many families. Family, Friend and Neighbor Babies are born learning. Children’s earliest experiences and relationships make a huge difference in the way their brains develop. Caregivers, like par- ents, have a significant impact on young children’s development. It is important that all understand that time spent with young children can positively affect each child’s growth and development. There are dozens of “teachable mo- ments” everyday in which family, friends and neighbors can help children develop skills that lay the foundation for school readiness. Caregivers are more likely to understand how children learn when they have access to information, resources and support. The goal of our FAMILY, FRIEND AND NEIGHBOR PROGRAM is a comprehensive, community-based network of supports and resources for family, friend and neighbor caregivers and the children in their care. This work is funded by private foundations, local gov- ernment, United Way of King County, and individual contributions. Our Work with Homeless Families Between 2006 and 2010, there was a 20 percent increase in family homelessness resulting from a variety of factors, including lack of affordable housing, financial setbacks, poverty, domestic violence, changing family demographics, and reduced government supports. In 2011, 42 percent of homeless children were under the age of six. Because research shows that the developmental foundations for learning and quality of life are established during the early years of life, when brain development is especially active, the insta- bility and stresses of homelessness have particularly concerning consequences for young children's healthy development and school success. For children without homes, a nurturing caregiver and safe environment are especially crucial to success later in life Yet child care is a major expense that working families are challenged to balance with their multiple other needs – finding housing, attending domestic violence counseling, seeking employment, and more. In 2011 our HOMELESS CHILD CARE PROGRAM helped 539 families who were homeless with 1,175 chil- dren by combining case management services alongside support for the child care providers who care for these children. Through our Homeless Child Care Program, we help thefamilies obtain child care, child care subsidies and other community resources in order to establish a supportive environment for their children and families; and deliver appropriate training and support to child care providers who care for children who are homeless. Child Care Financial Assistance The CCR CHILD CARE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM provided over 11,000 days of child care scholarships in 2011 to families who have moderate or low incomes, but whose incomes are over the threshold for the State’s Working Connections Child Care Sub- sidy. These families struggle to pay for child care at the level of quality needed by their children to be successful in school. To qualify for CCFA, parents must be working and/or completing their education and be ineligible for other financial assistance. Child Care Resources Annual Report 2011 CCR exercises leadership in the early learning community using our competitive advantages of field expertise and our ability to leverage our expertise and data in a responsive way to inform decision-making. Resources for Teachers and Providers CCR provides culturally relevant and inclusive technical assistance and training to the 2,200 licensed child care providers in King County. This is provided onsite and by telephone and addresses issues that providers are experiencing: a child of concern, marketing their program, creating an environment or curriculum that supports children's development. Staff also create materials that assist providers in developing and improving their programs, and provide trainings that offer basic to ad- vanced instruction on a variety of child development topics and best practices.
Recommended publications
  • Class of 2003 Finals Program
    School of Law One Hundred and Seventy-Fourth FINAL EXERCISES The Lawn May 18, 2003 1 Distinction 2 High Distinction 3 Highest Distinction 4 Honors 5 High Honors 6 Highest Honors 7 Distinguished Majors Program School of Law Finals Speaker Mortimer M. Caplin Former Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service Mortimer Caplin was born in New York in 1916. He came to Charlottesville in 1933, graduating from the College in 1937 and the Law School in 1940. During the Normandy invasion, he served as U.S. Navy beachmaster and was cited as a member of the initial landing force on Omaha Beach. He continued his federal service as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service under President Kennedy from 1961 to 1964. When he entered U.Va. at age 17, Mr. Caplin committed himself to all aspects of University life. From 1933-37, he was a star athlete in the University’s leading sport—boxing—achieving an undefeated record for three years in the mid-1930s and winning the NCAA middleweight title in spite of suffering a broken hand. He also served as coach of the boxing team and was president of the University Players drama group. At the School of Law, he was editor-in-chief of the Virginia Law Review and graduated as the top student in his class. In addition to his deep commitment to public service, he is well known for his devotion to teaching and to the educational process and to advancing tax law. Mr. Caplin taught tax law at U.Va. from 1950-61, while serving as president of the Atlantic Coast Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section (PDF929KB)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • What Seattle Judge Said About Trump Travel Ban—And What Happens Next
    What Seattle Judge Said About Trump Travel Ban—and What Happens Next By Vanessa Blum The National Law Journal February 5, 2017 U.S. District Judge James Robart of the Western District of Washington Credit: Youtube On Friday, U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle entered a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order and setting up an accelerated appellate showdown over the sudden suspension of immigration from seven predominantly Muslim nations. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied the government’s request for an immediate stay and set an expedited briefing schedule. Lawyers representing the states of Washington and Minnesota, which are challenging the ban, must respond during predawn hours on Monday and the Justice Department must file its reply Monday evening. Here are some key exchanges from the hearing that will shape the court fight ahead. On the motivation for the executive order: Statements that President Trump made during the campaign about banning Muslims from entering the United States may have bearing on the states’ likelihood of prevailing on claims that the executive order impermissibly targets individuals based on religion. At Friday’s hearing, Robart asked Washington Solicitor General Noah Purcell whether the campaign trail promises should be considered. JUDGE JAMES ROBART: It seems to me that it's a bit of a reach to say: The President is clearly anti-Muslim or anti-Islam, based on what he said in New Hampshire in June. NOAH PURCELL: Well, Your Honor, it might go to the weight to give the evidence, I suppose.
    [Show full text]
  • Countermajoritarian Difficulty Nello Scontro Politico-Giuridico Sul “Muslim Ban” Del Presidente Trump: Una Riflessione
    Giorgia Costabile IL GIUDIZIARIO AT THE BAR OF POLITICS. LA COUNTERMAJORITARIAN DIFFICULTY NELLO SCONTRO POLITICO-GIURIDICO SUL “MUSLIM BAN” DEL PRESIDENTE TRUMP: UNA RIFLESSIONE Working Paper 2/2018 ISSN 2531-9728 Diritti comparati. Working paper [Online] Editore: Andrea Buratti, Giuseppe Martinico, Oreste Pollicino, Giorgio Repetto, Raffaele Torino Coordinatore Editoriale: Serenella Quari Sede: Via Roentgen, 1 – 20136 Milano E-mail: [email protected] Data di pubblicazione: 04/06/2018 2-2018 Giorgia Costabile IL GIUDIZIARIO AT THE BAR OF POLITICS. LA COUNTERMAJORITARIAN DIFFICULTY NELLO SCONTRO POLITICO-GIURIDICO SUL “MUSLIM BAN” DEL PRESIDENTE TRUMP: UNA RIFLESSIONE Dottoressa di ricerca in Politica Cultura e Sviluppo, Università della Calabria. Sommario. I. Introduzione al dilemma democratico della judicial review: attualità della countermajoritarian difficulty. - II. La politica migratoria restrittiva del Presidente Trump e la risposta del giudiziario. Il ruolo della judicial review al crocevia tra giustizia e politica. - III. La Corte Suprema e il diritto all’ultima parola sull’executive order del Presidente Trump. - IV. Conclusioni. I. Introduzione al dilemma democratico della judicial review: attualità della countermajoritarian difficulty1. La domanda al cuore del problema, un vero dilemma che ha attraversato l’intera storia americana seppur prodotto e declinato sulla scorta di un set di circostanze storicamente contingenti, è quella relativa alla legittimazione democratica del potere giudiziario (federale), i cui
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdiction and Judicial Self-Defense
    ESSAY JURISDICTION AND JUDICIAL SELF-DEFENSE S. CAGLE JUHAN† & GREG RUSTICO‡ INTRODUCTION Recently, much of the legal community has been captivated by the rapid developments in State of Washington v. Trump,1 the case challenging the legality of President Trump’s Executive Order 13,769 (“the Immigration Order”). Among other provisions, the Immigration Order temporarily suspended the refugee admissions program, blocked the entry of persons from designated Middle Eastern countries, and indefinitely suspended entry of Syrian nationals.2 A number of suits were brought challenging the legality of the action, including one by the State of Washington, which Minnesota later joined.3 In the ten days following Washington’s filing suit to enjoin the Immigration Order, District Judge James Robart issued a nationwide temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against it,4 the Government sought an emergency stay on appeal,5 and the Ninth Circuit handed down a twenty-nine page † J.D., University of Virginia School of Law; B.A. with distinction, University of Virginia. ‡ J.D., University of Virginia School of Law; M.Ed., B.A., University of Notre Dame. 1 No. C17-0141, 2017 WL 462040 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 3, 2017), motion for stay pending appeal denied, 847 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2017). 2 Exec. Order No. 13,769, 82 Fed. Reg. 8977, 8977-79 (Jan. 27, 2017). 3 See Scott Malone & Dan Levine, Challenges to Trump’s Immigration Orders Spread to More U.S. States, REUTERS (Feb. 1, 2017), http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-sanfrancisco- idUSKBN15F2B1 [https://perma.cc/3J6Q-X56K] (detailing the states that had challenged President Trump’s Immigration Order as of February 1, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comments on Georgia Waiver from September 12, 2020 Through
    #634 9/12/20 To Whom It May Concern I do not support the move from healthcare.gov to a privatized enrollment system that relies on for-profit insurance companies who will not act in my best interest. I support a Georgia reinsurance program because it will help lower premiums. Thank you very much. JD Sincerely, JD Atlanta, GA 30305 #635 9/12/20 To Whom It May Concern I do not support the move from healthcare.gov to a privatized enrollment system that relies on for-profit insurance companies who will not act in my best interest. Health care should be a right, and not be treated like a commodity dictated by the free market. The proposed system will perpetuate existing racist systems designed to keep people of color uninsured. I support a Georgia reinsurance program because it will help lower premiums. Thank you very much. Sincerely, AT Atlanta, GA 30317 1 #636 9/12/20 To Whom It May Concern I do not support the move from healthcare.gov to a privatized enrollment system that relies on for-profit insurance companies who will not act in my best interest. I support a Georgia reinsurance program because it will help lower premiums. Thank you very much. Sincerely, MC Atlanta, GA 30312 #637 (submitted comments 2 times) 9/12/20 Does this email address work now? Thanks, NB 9/12/20 I am resending this email as it did not go throught the first time. I am a physician. My family has had health insurance through ACA since 2017. When we researched other options we only found offers for less comprehensive insurance masquerading as full coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • FBA Newsletter Summer 04
    SUMMER 2004 FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION of the Western District of Washington NEWS NEWS NEWS NEWS VOL. 27 NO. 1 SUMMER 2004 NEW U.S. COURTHOUSE GRACES SEATTLE SKYLINE FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION NEWS PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE A BUSY SUMMER IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT ’ll keep this short. There’s a lot going on in the Western District of Washington this spring and summer. For starters, we have Itwo new district judges and a new United States Courthouse. Things like that certainly don’t happen every year. Our new judges are profiled in this issue. several workstations with Internet complete and turn in your registration Perhaps the best reflection of their access for laptops, a copier, at least one form each year. Your membership dues stature is the fact that they were both desktop computer for anyone to use, a are not significant enough to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate without computer with access to the court’s memorable. But the budget to publish controversy in a time of extraordinary electronic docket, and some temporary this newsletter, present CLEs, support gridlock over judicial nominations. The lockable storage in which to leave a the activities of our various committees, Western District’s success in keeping its document case or other materials for an and plan other activities is based on federal bench fully staffed in polarized hour or two. Please make good use of member dues. If you can’t remember political times also reflects the these facilities, but take good care of whether you’ve registered for 2004, exceptional collegiality among the them too.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Richard H. Chambers and His Pasadena Courthouse Caleb Langston
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 19, NUMBERS 1 & 2 2006 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all, Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250--$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright C2006, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY COMMEMORATING THE CENTENNIAL OF THE JAMES R. BROWNING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1905-2005 VOLUME 18, NUMBERS 1 & 2 2005 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100- $249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright 02005, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Filling the Ninth Circuit Vacancies
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 27 (2018-2019) Issue 4 Article 6 May 2019 Filling the Ninth Circuit Vacancies Carl Tobias Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Judges Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Repository Citation Carl Tobias, Filling the Ninth Circuit Vacancies, 27 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1113 (2019), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol27/iss4/6 Copyright c 2019 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj FILLING THE NINTH CIRCUIT VACANCIES Carl Tobias* ABSTRACT Upon Republican President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit experienced some pressing appellate vacancies, which the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO) carefully identified as “judicial emergencies” because the tribunal resolves a massive docket. Last year’s death of the iconic liberal champion Stephen Reinhardt and the late 2017 departure of libertarian former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski—who both assumed pivotal circuit leadership roles over numerous years—and a few of their colleagues’ decision to leave active court service thereafter, mean the tribunal presently confronts four judicial emergencies and resolves most slowly the largest number of appeals. The 2016 and 2018 federal election cycles—which render uncertain the party that will capture the presidency and the Senate at the polls in 2020—show that more posts could open when additional jurists determine that they will change status across the Trump Administration. Nevertheless, striking partisanship will frustrate the effort to appoint Ninth Circuit judges.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report Frye Art Museum 2018 Annual Report 2 Table of Contents
    2018 OUR MISSION The Frye Art Museum is a living legacy of visionary patronage and civic responsibility, committed to artistic inquiry and a rich visitor experience. A catalyst for our engagement with contemporary art and artists is the Founding Collection of Charles and Emma Frye, access to which shall always be free. OUR VISION Reflecting Seattle's evolving identity through exhibitions, programs, and outreach, the Frye Art Museum showcases local and global artists who are exploring the issues of our time as well as contemporary scholarship on historical subject matter. By taking calculated risks, we uncover new voices, facilitate conversation, and engage our community in relevant social dialogues. 1 FRYE ART MUSEUM 2018 ANNUAL REPORT FRYE ART MUSEUM 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 2018 at a Glance 61 Support Contributors 7 Letter from the Director/CEO Members Volunteers 9 Exhibitions Staff Lenders to Exhibitions 89 Financial Information 29 Collections & Stewardship Artworks on Loan 91 Frye by the Numbers Acquisitions 51 Arts Engagement Programs Students & Youth Creative Aging Public Programs Special Events 3 FRYE ART MUSEUM 2018 ANNUAL REPORT FRYE ART MUSEUM 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 4 Photos: Jonathan Vanderweit Total Attendance Number of Exhibitions Educational Programs 2018 AT A GLANCE 109,249 8 936 Program Participants Visits to Members fryemuseum.org 18,831 342,772 2,383 5 FRYE ART MUSEUM 2018 ANNUAL REPORT FRYE ART MUSEUM 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 6 LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR/CEO The above words, written on a Visitor Comment Card in January In this spirit, we dedicate our 2018 Annual Report to the myriad of 2018, express one of the countless powerful experiences felt by voices that make up our community: members, artists, supporters, visitors to our inaugural exhibition of 2018, Tavares Strachan: Always, neighbors, volunteers, our digital community, and each of the LETTER FROM Sometimes, Never.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs, and Service Awards
    Case 1:13-md-02493-JPB-JES Document 1140 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 12198 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA IN RE: MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, No. 1:13-md-02493-JPB-JES INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL CASES PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS Plaintiffs Diana Mey, Phillip Charvat, Jason Bennett, Scott Dolemba, Janet and Michael Hodgin move the Court for an order granting an award of attorneys’ fees of $9,333,333, litigation costs of $602,909.33, and service awards of $50,000 each to Plaintiffs Mey and Charvat; $6,012 to Plaintiff Bennett; and $3,500 to Plaintiffs Dolemba, and the Hodgins. In support of their requests, Plaintiffs refer to the Court to the accompanying Memorandum in Support, and supporting declarations. At the time this motion is ripe for decision, the Court will have held a hearing on final approval of the Settlement Agreement, the award of attorneys’ fees and costs, and Plaintiffs’ service awards and will have provided an opportunity for those with objections, if any, to be heard. Dated: January 18, 2018 Respectfully Submitted, BAILEY & GLASSER LLP By: /s/ Jonathan R. Marshall Jonathan R. Marshall 209 Capitol Street Charleston, West Virginia 25301 (304) 345-6555 (304) 342-1110 (fax) Email: [email protected] Case 1:13-md-02493-JPB-JES Document 1140 Filed 01/18/18 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 12199 Liaison Counsel John W. Barrett Ryan M. Donovan BAILEY & GLASSER LLP 209 Capitol Street Charleston, West Virginia 25301 (304) 345-6555 (304) 342-1110 (fax) Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC By: /s/ Beth E.
    [Show full text]