DOCSLIB.ORG

ACWS Water Data Audit Report, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACWS Water Data Audit Report, 2015 .. .. .... ~;~ter data services Report Prepared for: South Australia Envii ronment Protection Authority South Australia Adelaide Coastal Water Study : S1t ormwater Data Audit Report 2015 Water Data Services Pt¥ Ltd www .waterdata.com.au. 1 Erudf11a Ave Edwa rdstown SA 5039 P 08 837'4 3522 F OS- 8374 3566 Date: Tuesday 20th June 2017 Delivery: Electronic Copy (via email) Principal Environment Protection Officer (Water Quality) Environment Protection Authority SA Level 9, 250 Victoria Square, ADELAIDE, 5000 Via email: Report: Adelaide Coastal Waters Study : Stormwater Data Audit Report 2015 Client Contact: Principal Environment Protection Officer (Water Quality) Environment Protection Authority SA Level 9, 250 Victoria Square, ADELAIDE, SA, 5000 Via email: Contractor: Prepared and submitted by: Operations Manager Water Data Services Pty Ltd 1 Erudina Ave Edwardstown SA 5039 Telephone 08 8374 3522 Facsimile 08 8374 3566 E-mail ~~ter data services Environment Protection Authority SA Executive Summary In 2005 a data audit was undertaken to investigate data availability for current and historical monitoring programs in the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study (ACWS) area. The audit was focussed on stormwater quality and quantity and identified data gaps in the monitoring programs. This report in 2015 is an audit of the data collected in the period 2005 to 2014 to determine if previous monitoring gaps have been filled and identify current and future gaps in the monitoring programs. The report also summarises changes and improvements to data sets report in the 2005 audit. Flows observed during this period were influenced by drought conditions. The several years of below average rainfall resulted in prolonged periods of below average flow. Environmental flow regimes were designed and introduced to the major rivers to maintain river health and ecosystems. These environmental flow releases occurred in the Gawler (South Para), Torrens and Onkaparinga Rivers and were facilitated by water released from the reservoirs. A consequence of this was that the water released had a proportion of River Murray water which has substantially different water quality characteristics to the natural stormwater runoff in the lower catchments. Water quality improvement and water security infrastructure was installed across the ACWS catchments as part of the Australian Government's Water for the Future initiative which included wetlands and MAR schemes. The primary objective of these initiatives is to improve water security but they may also have some direct and indirect benefits to water quality. Major transport infrastructure projects were constructed in the ACWS catchments including the Southern Expressway duplication, Northern Expressway, Port River Expressway and bridge, South Road Superway and the extension of the Seaford railway line. The availability of flow and water quality data has improved substantially since the previous audit and a strong shift towards data sharing between the many different agencies operating monitoring programs in the ACWS has meant that added value can be extracted from capital expenditure on monitoring infrastructure. The majority of the monitoring projects utilise hydrometric monitoring stations with flow proportional composite sampling instrumentation to facilitate the data collection. Natural Resources - Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges (AMLR) operate the largest water quality monitoring network in the ACWS area and have a designated website available to the public to view the data. The architecture of this website has i ~ -~ter data services Environment Protection Authority SA been made available to local council and SA Water monitoring programs to become a data hub for the region. Auditing of the monitoring programs and data identified that many of the previous data gaps from 2005 have been filled. This fits with the set up of the AMLR designed Outfall Flow network. New monitoring stations have been commissioned near the stormwater discharge points for most of the major creeks and rivers. Remaining gaps in the ACWS stormwater catchments include the Southern coastal catchments, the Patawalonga Coastal stormwater drainage systems (Holdfast drains) and the Buckland Park Lake (Gawler River Discharge). Rainfall runoff models were developed for the un-gauged catchments with the objective to provide a mean annual discharge from the AWCS catchments into the gulf. Combining the modelled flow with the data from the gauging stations determined that the mean annual flow from 2005 to 2014 was 92GL/yr. Water quality monitoring was not performed at all sites for the reporting period, therefore a reduced period of 2009-2014 was used as the data set. Combining the flow proportional composite sample water quality results with the corresponding flow data determines the mean annual water quality pollutant loads. The results observed were 149T/year Total Nitrogen, 14.2T/year Total Phosphorus and 4140T/year Suspended Solids. Over 50% of each of the total pollutant loads is discharged from the Torrens, Gawler and Onkaparinga Rivers. The following recommendations have been provided to continue to meet and better inform the objectives of the ACWS: Verification monitoring for the stormwater drain system flow models Flow monitoring of the Buckland Park Lake Flow and WQ monitoring of the southern creek catchments Maximise use of instrumentation technology including flow and water quality alerts Real time monitoring for turbidity, customised web pages and reports Investigate a catchment targeted pesticide sampling program Incorporate wetland and MAR scheme monitoring programs into reports and database for the ACWS catchments Maintain the current regime of historical monitoring stations to observe changing trends in the catchments. ii ~~ter data services Environment Protection Authority SA Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 Climate Summary ................................................................................................................ 3 3 Stormwater Sources ............................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Stormwater Source Classification ............................................................................................. 4 3.2 Influences on stormwater flow and quality 2005-2014 .............................................................. 9 3.3 ACWS Catchment Summaries ................................................................................................. 12 3.3.1 Gawler River ................................................................................................................................................ 12 3.3.2 Thompson Creek and Smith Creek .............................................................................................................. 15 3.3.3 Helps Road Drain and Adams Creek ............................................................................................................ 17 3.3.4 Little Para River ........................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.5 Dry Creek .................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.6 Port Adelaide and Barker Inlet .................................................................................................................... 22 3.3.7 Torrens River ............................................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.8 Patawalonga Basin ...................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.9 Field River ................................................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.10 Christie Creek.......................................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.11 Onkaparinga River .................................................................................................................................. 35 3.3.12 Pedler Creek ........................................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.13 Silver Sands Catchment (Washpool Lagoon) .......................................................................................... 40 4 Availability of Flow Data.................................................................................................... 42 4.1 Data compatibility across the ACWS area ............................................................................... 49 4.2 Flow Data Gaps ..................................................................................................................... 49 5 Flow Data Summary .......................................................................................................... 50 5.1 Estimating Flows in Un-gauged Catchments ............................................................................ 50 5.1.1 Estimating Losses in Buckland Park
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Onkaparinga River National Park 1544Ha and Recreation Park 284Ha
    Onkaparinga River National Park 1544ha and Recreation Park 284ha The Onkaparinga River – South Australia’s second longest – flows through two very different parks on its journey to the sea, creating a contrast of gullies, gorges and wetlands. In Onkaparinga River National Park, diverse hiking trails take you to cliff tops with magnificent views, or down to permanent rock pools teeming with life. You’ll see rugged ridge tops and the narrow river valley of the spectacular Onkaparinga Gorge. The park protects some of the finest remaining pockets of remnant vegetation in the Southern Adelaide region. Areas of the park were used as farmland for many years, so you can also discover heritage-listed huts and the ruins of houses built in the 1880s. Wherever you go, you’ll be among native wildlife such as birds, koalas, kangaroos and possums - you may even spot an echidna. In Onkaparinga Recreation Park, the river spills onto the plains, creating wetland ponds and flood plains. The area conserves important fish Contact breeding habitat and hundreds of native plant and animal species, many of which are rare. The Onkaparinga River estuary also provides habitat for Emergency: 000 endangered migratory birds. Onkaparinga River National Park and Rec Park The recreation park is popular with people of all ages and interests. You (+61 8) 8550 3400 can go fishing in the river, wander along the wetland boardwalks, ride a bicycle on the shared use trails, walk your dog (on a lead), kayak the calm General park enquiries: (+61 8) 8204 1910 waters or just be at peace with nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillslope Erosion and Post-Fire Sediment Trapping at Mount Bold, South Australia
    42 Wildfire and Water Quality: Processes, Impacts and Challenges (Proceedings of a conference held in Banff, Canada, 11–14 June 2012) (IAHS Publ. 354, 2012). Hillslope erosion and post-fire sediment trapping at Mount Bold, South Australia ROWENA MORRIS1,2, DEIRDRE DRAGOVICH3 & BERTRAM OSTENDORF1 1 Earth and Environmental Science, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5064, Australia [email protected] 2 Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, Level 5, 340 Albert Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia 3 School of Geosciences, Madsen Building (F09), University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia Abstract Successful placement of sediment traps requires an understanding of how hillslope morphology influences erosion. Following the 2007 Mount Bold wildfire, in South Australia, a 1 in 5 year rainfall event resulted in the failure of many sediment traps due to substantial sediment movement within the reservoir reserve. This study assesses how hillslope morphology can influence post-fire surface erosion and the subsequent appropriate placement of sediment traps. Erosion pins and sediment traps were used at five different sites to measure hillslope surface change and trapped sediment volumes. Terrestrial laser scanning was used to model surface change where slope gradients are 1:2 or greater. Surface change was assessed in relation to slope gradient, slope length, cross-slope curvature, hillslope position and fire severity. The results suggested a threshold for substantial increased sediment yield at slope gradients of 1:2. The findings also suggested that concave cross-slope curvatures were associated with significantly larger amounts of sediment movement. Key words water reservoir; sediment trap; erosion pins; terrestrial laser scanning; slope gradient; cross-slope plan curvature, South Australia INTRODUCTION Wildfires influence soil surface processes resulting in the potential for increased sedimentation of reservoirs and impacts on water quality (Smith et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Photography by John Hodgson Foreword By
    Editor in chief Christopher B. Daniels Foreword by Photography by John Hodgson Barbara Hardy Table of contents Foreword by Barbara Hardy 13 Preface and acknowledgements 14 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 35 Box 1: The watercycle Philip Roetman 38 Box 2: The four colours of freshwater Jennifer McKay 44 Box 3: Environmentally sustainable development (ESD) Jennifer McKay 46 Box 4: Sustainable development timeline Jennifer McKay 47 Box 5: Adelaide’s water supply timeline Thorsten Mosisch 48 CHAPTER 2 The variable climate 51 Elizabeth Curran, Christopher Wright, Darren Ray Box 6: Does Adelaide have a Mediterranean climate? Elizabeth Curran and Darren Ray 53 Box 7: The nature of flooding Robert Bourman 56 Box 8: Floods in the Adelaide region Chris Wright 61 Box 9: Significant droughts Elizabeth Curran 65 CHAPTER 3 Catchments and waterways 69 Robert P. Bourman, Nicholas Harvey, Simon Bryars Box 10: The biodiversity of Buckland Park Kate Smith 71 Box 11: Tulya Wodli Riparian Restoration Project Jock Conlon 77 Box 12: Challenges to environmental flows Peter Schultz 80 Box 13: The flood of 1931 David Jones 83 Box 14: Why conserve the Field River? Chris Daniels 87 CHAPTER 4 Aquifers and groundwater 91 Steve Barnett, Edward W. Banks, Andrew J. Love, Craig T. Simmons, Nabil Z. Gerges Box 15: Soil profiles and soil types in the Adelaide region Don Cameron 93 Box 16: Why do Adelaide houses crack in summer? Don Cameron 95 Box 17: Salt damp John Goldfinch 99 Box 18: Saltwater intrusion Ian Clark 101 CHAPTER 5 Biodiversity of the waterways 105 Christopher B. Daniels,
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide Coastal Waters Information Sheet No. 3
    Adelaide Coastal Waters Information Sheet No. 3 Changes in urban environments Issued August 2009 EPA 769/09: This information sheet is part of a series of Fact Sheets on the Adelaide coastal waters and the findings of the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study (ACWS). Introduction Since European settlement in the 1830s, the Adelaide plains and Adelaide’s coastal environment have been subject to considerable change and pressure from a continually increasing population. In recent years there has been growing community concern about the effects of coastal and catchment development on the marine environment. Increases in stormwater flows and waste from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have also been of concern. Nutrients and other pollutants introduced to Adelaide’s nearshore waters from urban and rural runoff, WWTPs and some industrial sources have been found by the Adelaide Coastal Waters Study (ACWS) to have had a negative impact on Adelaide’s nearshore marine environment, including the loss of over 5,000 hectares of seagrass. Historical catchment changes When Adelaide was selected by Colonel William Light for South Australia’s state capital in 1836 there was a wide belt of coastal dunes and wide sandy beaches stretching to the north and south of Glenelg. From Seacliff to Outer Harbor there was a 30 km stretch of sand dunes broken only by the Patawalonga Creek at Glenelg. The Torrens River flowed into a series of swamps lying behind the coastal dunes and drained both north and south to the sea through the Patawalonga Creek and Port River system. The stretch of sand dunes comprised two or more parallel ridges each about 70 to 100 metres wide separated by narrow depressions or swales, consequently very little surface catchment runoff would have reached the coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454
    South Australian HERITAGE COUNCIL SUMMARY OF STATE HERITAGE PLACE REGISTER ENTRY Entry in the South Australian Heritage Register in accordance with the Heritage Places Act 1993 NAME: Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454 ADDRESS: Franklin Parade, Encounter Bay, SA 5211 Uncovered well 23 November 2017 Site works complete June 2019 Source DEW Source DEW Cultural Safety Warning Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be aware that this document may contain images or names of people who have since passed away. STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE The Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site is on the lands and waters of the Ramindjeri people of the lower Fleurieu Peninsula, who are a part of the Ngarrindjeri Nation. The site represents a once significant early industry that no longer exists in South Australia. Founded by the South Australian Company in 1837 and continually operating until 1851, it was the longest-running whaling station in the State. It played an important role in the establishment of the whaling industry in South Australia as a prototype for other whaling stations and made a notable contribution to the fledgling colony’s economic development. The Rosetta Head Whaling Station is also an important contact site between European colonists and the Ramindjeri people. To Ramindjeri people, the whale is known as Kondli (a spiritual being), and due to their connection and knowledge, a number of Ramindjeri were employed at the station as labourers and boat crews. Therefore, Rosetta Head is one of the first places in South Australia where European and Aboriginal people worked side by side.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Torrens—Friend and Foe Part 2
    The River Torrens—friend and foe Part 2: The river as an obstacle to be crossed RICHARD VENUS Richard Venus BTech, BA, GradCertArchaeol, MIE Aust is a retired electrical engineer who now pursues his interest in forensic heritology, researching and writing about South Australia’s engineering heritage. He is Chairman of Engineering Heritage South Australia and Vice President of the History Council of South Australia. His email is [email protected] Beginnings In Part 1 we looked the River Torrens as a friend—a source of water vital to the establishment of the new settlement. However, in common with so many other European settlements, the developing community very quickly polluted its own water supply and another source had to be found. This was still the River Torrens but the water was collected in the Torrens Gorge, about 13 kilometres north-east of the City, and piped down Payneham Road to the Valve House in the East Parklands. Water from this source was first made available in December 1860 as reported in the South Australian Advertiser on 26 December. The significant challenge presented by the Torrens was getting across it. In summer, when the river was little more than a series of pools, you could just walk across. However, there must have been a significant body of water somewhere – probably in the vicinity of today’s weir – because in July 1838 tenders were called ‘For the rent for six months of the small punt on the Torrens for foot passengers, for each of whom a toll of one penny will be authorised to be charged from day-light to dark, and two pence after dark’ (Register 28 July).
    [Show full text]
  • Barker Inlet and Port River Estuary System
    community water quality program run by NRM Education NRM by run program quality water community • Urban Forest Biodiversity Program Biodiversity Forest Urban • The late Vitas Karnaitis - a volunteer monitoring the estuary as part of the the of part as estuary the monitoring volunteer a - Karnaitis Vitas late The • Project Dolphin Safe Dolphin Project • • Port Adelaide Kaurna community Kaurna Adelaide Port • • Primary Industries and Resources SA (PIRSA) SA Resources and Industries Primary • • City of Salisbury of City • • Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Authority Protection Environment • • Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Resources Natural and Environment of Department • assistance of the following organisations: following the of assistance Mallala This brochure was produced by NRM Education with the the with Education NRM by produced was brochure This • Cities of Playford, Port Adelaide Enfield, Salisbury and Salisbury Enfield, Adelaide Port Playford, of Cities • • Barker Inlet Port Estuaries Committee (BIPEC) Committee Estuaries Port Inlet Barker • Management Board Management • Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Natural Ranges Lofty Mount and Adelaide • State and local government: local and State • University of South Australia South of University • • University of Adelaide of University • (SARDI) Institute Development and Research Australian South • • Flinders University of South Australia South of University Flinders • Research institutions: Research • Project Dolphin Safe and SA Seabird
    [Show full text]
  • Glenthorne State Heritage Area
    GLENTHORNE STATE HERITAGE AREA Proposal to the Hon. David Speirs MLC, Minister for Environment and Water and Recommendations for a Heritage Precinct at Glenthorne by Dr Pamela Smith (Senior Research Fellow, College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University) for the Friends of Glenthorne Revised September 2018 (March 2018) Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 State Heritage Legislation ....................................................................................... 5 3 Review of the current status of State heritage registered buildings.......................... 5 4 Glenthorne. Proposed State Heritage Area and ‘Heritage Precinct’ ........................ 15 Attachments Attachment 1. Heritage Statement for Glenthorne. Attachment 2. South Australian Heritage Places Act 1993 Part 7: Attachment 3. University of Adelaide, 2004, Heritage Listed Buildings Inventory, p. 79,81- 88, 90 – Glenthorne. Report to the University of Adelaide by McDougall & Vines, 2004. ii 1 Introduction The Friends of Glenthorne believe that the historic property Glenthorne, O’Halloran Hill, fulfils the criteria for registration as a State Heritage Area on the South Australian Register of Heritage Places. Glenthorne is currently an agricultural property of 208ha at O’Halloran Hill, S.A.; it was transferred in June 2018 from the University of Adelaide to the South Australian government for inclusion in the Glenthorne National Park. First
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN SPACE and PLACES for PEOPLE GRANT PROGRAM 2019/20 - Metropolitan Councils
    OPEN SPACE AND PLACES FOR PEOPLE GRANT PROGRAM 2019/20 - Metropolitan Councils OPEN SPACE AND PLACES FOR PEOPLE GRANT PROGRAM 2019/20 - Metropolitan Councils PROJECT NAME Whitmore Square/ Iparrityi Master Plan - Stage 1 Upgrade (City of Adelaide) COST AND FUNDING CONTRIBUTION Council contribution $1,400,000 Planning and Development Fund contribution $900,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,300,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Council is seeking funding to deliver the first stage of the master plan to establish pleasant walking paths and extend the valued leafy character of the square from its centre to its edges. This project involves: Safety improvements to the northern tri-intersection at Morphett and Wright Streets. Greening and paths that frame the inner edges of the square. The Northern tri-intersection will commence first, followed by the greening and pedestrian connections. TIMELINE OF THE WORKS Construction work to begin May and be completed by December 2020. Masterplan perspective PROJECT NAME Moonta Street Upgrade (City of Adelaide) COST AND FUNDING CONTRIBUTION Contribution Source Amount Council contribution TBC Planning and Development Fund contribution $2,000,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,000,000* PROJECT DESCRIPTION Council is seeking funding to establish Moonta Street as the next key linkage in connecting the Central Market to Riverbank Precinct through north-south road laneways. The project involves: • the installation of quality stone paving throughout and the installation of landscaping to position Moonta Street as a comfortable green promenade and a premium precinct for evening activity. TIMELINE OF WORKS • The first stage of this project is detailed design prior to any works on ground commencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development
    DWLBC REPORT Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development 2007/09 Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development Kim Teoh Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation January 2006 Report DWLBC 2007/09 Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au Disclaimer Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. © Government of South Australia, through the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2007 This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission obtained from the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Chief Executive, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001. ISBN-13 978-1-921218-45-3 Preferred way to cite this publication Teoh, K 2006, Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Patawalonga Catchment and the Impact of Farm Dam Development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment
    DWLBC REPORT The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment 2003/19 The Impact of Farm Dam Development on the Surface Water Resources of the South Para River Catchment Kim Teoh Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation June 2006 Report DWLBC 2003/19 Knowledge and Information Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au Disclaimer Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. © Government of South Australia, through the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2007 This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission obtained from the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Chief Executive, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001.
    [Show full text]
  • 6814 Ewat Brochure and Map.Pdf
    LOWER PORTRUSH ROAD O.G ROAD 1 STEPHEN PORTRUSH ROAD GLYNBURN ROAD GLYNBURN TERRACE PAYNEHAM ROAD NELSON STREET 6 3 2 7 5 8 9 MAGILL ROAD FULLARTON ROAD 4 NORTH TERRACE THE PARADE The Eastside Wine & Ale Trail provides the opportunity to experience some of South Australia’s finest 1. Amadio Wines wine and to taste some of 2. CW Wines Adelaide’s best boutique beer, 3. Ferg’s Stepney without leaving the City. 4. Heartland Wines 5. Lambrook Wines 6. Little Bang Brewing Co. Located only minutes east of Adelaide’s CBD, in the heart of the City of Norwood Payneham & St Peters 7. Moorooroo Park are eight boutique cellar doors and a micro-brewery. Vineyards Designed to bring people together to enjoy great wine 8. Signature Wines and ale in nine relaxed environments, so close to home, the Eastside Wine & Ale Trail will win the hearts of all 9. Vineyard Road who visit. Get to know the great operators and their history as you sip and sample your way along the Trail. Come for an hour or stay for the day, the Eastside Wine & Ale Trail will not disappoint. Welcome to Adelaide’s only inner‑city Wine & Ale Trail! Amadio Wines Amadio A cellar door in the suburbs with a unique The impressive list of national and international atmosphere is what you encounter as you trophies and gold medals awarded to Amadio, enter Amadio Wines. Built on a long history vintage after vintage, bears positive testimony of successful and award-winning winemaking, to a consistent standard of exceptional quality.
    [Show full text]