Selected Perspectives on the Giant Sequoia Groves1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Selected Perspectives on the Giant Sequoia Groves1 Selected Perspectives on the Giant Sequoia Groves1 Dwight Willard2 Abstract. Several perspectives on the groves are briefly treated. Broader appreciation is needed of the giant sequoia groves which are not famous Broader Appreciation of Sequoia and easily accessible. The USDA Forest Service administers the largest Resources Is Needed single ownership of natural giant sequoia grove acreage. The giant sequoia groves have major resource values in addition to old-growth giant Despite the fame of the sequoia as a species, most of sequoias. Certain giant sequoias should be considered rare plants. Giant the sequoia groves are relatively unknown to the public. sequoia groves that suffered major sequoia logging retain sequoia values. Converse Basin Grove is globally significant. Manipulated widespread Visitors flock to several famous and easily accessible groves forest canopy destruction is not necessary to perpetuate giant sequoia such as North Calaveras Grove (Calaveras Big Trees State groves. Much basic research regarding giant sequoia resources is lacking, Park), Mariposa Grove (Yosemite National Park), Grant and the giant sequoia literature contains a surprising amount of misleading Grove (Kings Canyon National Park), and Giant Forest information. Public participation is needed in giant sequoia management. (Sequoia National Park). These highly visited groves are wonderful, with their many named huge sequoias and the cultural heritage of providing recreation for thousands ever Aside from the usual perspectives of awe and fascination since they became easily accessible in the 19th century. concerning old-growth sequoias (Sequoiadendron giganteum), But it is also wonderful to realize that they are only a small my studies have given me several perspectives on sequoia fraction of the sequoia resources. Unpublicized groves, resources and management options that are not commonly unfrequented by tourists and generally ignored in past expressed in much of the sequoia literature. A cursory sequoia literature, have majestic old-growth sequoia resources treatment of several of these perspectives is probably a more that are comparable to those in some famous groves. useful contribution to the proceedings of the Giant Sequoia Most of the less publicized groves are in Sequoia Symposium than a single topic paper. National Forest. In part, their obscurity understandably Everything that I have to contribute regarding the giant results from tourists and researchers giving more attention to sequoias begins from my belief that they are an incredible, preeminent National Park groves. But the lack of publicity inspirational natural resource that is very uplifting to about Sequoia National Forest groves also largely results research and discuss. The great majority of the primeval from past, de facto, unofficial Sequoia National Forest policy old-growth sequoias survived the sequoia logging era. Where not to publicize their groves or encourage recreation in the sequoias and other grove old-growth were logged, the them. Strangely, one has to learn of the sequoia wonders of groves can regain their old-growth forest character. The Sequoia National Forest by exploring like a 19th century sequoia groves are a marvelous, cheering exception to the pioneer, because written reference material, sequoia often gloomy assessments of the world's deteriorating natu- inventory information, useful grove maps, interpretive ral resources. With proper protection and management the activities, and even detailed published access information on groves can provide more public recreation and enjoyment the Forest's groves are almost nonexistent (as of June 1992). than at present, without resource degradation. There is no Very few of the Forest's groves have any maintained trails. more likely environmental issue on which to build a positive Sequoia National Forest groves were not even described management consensus. in the current Sequoia National Forest management plan The groves cover such a small total geographic area documentation (Sequoia National Forest 1985, 1988). None- they can be protected without the sort of controversy and theless, that so many of the sequoia groves are so little known is economically painful trade-offs associated with issues such still surprising, considering their magnificent resources. as how to preserve the northern spotted owl in millions Some of the notable unpublicized sequoia resources of of acres of Pacific Northwest forest. Total natural sequoia Sequoia National Forest are the following: grove acreage is less than 40,000 acres. Supplementary A. Freeman Creek Grove: This is the largest generally unpublished sequoia location data which has become unlogged grove on National Forest land and one of the finest available since 1975 confirms the earlier findings of such of all old-growth groves. Most of it is in wilderness condition. limited sequoia acreage in Hartesveldt and others (1975) and B. Black Mountain Grove: This grove (which extends Meyer and others (1952). into the Tule River Indian Reservation) is one of the ten largest groves in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the grove has a very high density of surviving mature and old-growth 1An abbreviated version of this paper was presented at the Symposium on Giant Sequoias: Their Place in the Ecosystem and Society, June 23-25, sequoias, though it has lost an overall old-growth character 1992, Visalia, California. from past logging. 2Attorney and author of a reference book on giant sequoia groves. C. Evans Grove: This large grove has dramatic Kings Canyon and peaks of the Monarch Divide and distant Sierra USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep.PSW-151. 1994. 15 Crest as scenic backdrops. The unlogged east section has a Suwanee Groves, which are known for having unusual very high density of old-growth sequoias. Much of the concentrations of exceptionally large specimens. western part of the grove was heavily logged before 1920 in It is important to emphasize that the USDA Forest a fascinating railroad logging episode. Old-growth stumps Service has the largest single ownership of sequoia grove and vestiges of the early logging era give the grove unusual acreage (Author's calculations, confirming Meyer and historical interest. Much of the logged section has recovered others 1952) because some past academic authorities (e.g., a scenic forest cover, including abundant young sequoias, Hartesveldt and others 1975) and outdated public agency mixed with scattered old-growth survivors. interpretive materials (e.g., 1993 display at Sequoia-Kings D. McIntyre Grove: This is another large grove with a Canyon National Parks' Grant Grove Visitor Center) have high density of surviving old-growth sequoias. It is part of incorrectly maintained that most grove acreage was in the viewshed of Highway 190 east of Camp Nelson. National Parks. Such error fosters the mistaken impression E. Packsaddle and Kennedy Groves: These are medium- that most grove acreage was protected by a legislative sized, trailless, wilderness condition groves, which remark- mandate that groves should be managed only for National ably survive in old-growth condition adjacent to heavily Park purposes, which exclude commercial timber harvest. logged non-grove timberland. These groves exemplify how No such legislative protection exists for the National Forest even smaller groves can serve as impressive preserves of groves, as illustrated by heavy logging of several Sequoia old-growth mixed-conifer forest, as well as sequoia preserves. National Forest Groves for non-sequoia timber in the 1980's. Kennedy Grove has the ninth largest known sequoia (the In the absence of protective legislation, the only way to Ishi Giant, discovered by the author in 1993, size ranking protect National Forest Groves is through the USDA Forest and volume computation by Wendell Flint) (fig. 1). Pack- Service planning and land management process. saddle Grove has numerous exceptionally large specimens, including the Packsaddle Giant, a sequoia with a larger base Non-Sequoia Resources within Groves than the General Sherman Tree (Flint 1987). Even within National Parks, many major grove resources Sequoia groves have major resource values worthy of are relatively unknown. In particular, the relative remoteness preservation aside from the old-growth sequoias. However of many Sequoia National Park groves has discouraged obvious this perspective sounds, it has been lacking in much visitation and study. About 15 of the Park's groves are acces- commentary on groves which focused preservation concerns sible only by rugged, sometimes even hazardous, cross-country solely on old-growth sequoias. A narrow view of grove routes. Park groves without trail access include Eden Creek resources has been expressed, for example, in disinterest or Grove, one of the largest Park groves, and smaller Oriole and disdain for current resources of logged groves. In agency Figure 1-Ishi Giant, Kennedy Grove. Though severely burned, this remote giant is 25.5 ft dbh counting buttresses, thicker than the General Sherman Tree. It was not definitively identified and measured until 1993, which suggests that other distinctive sequoia resources are yet to be discovered. 16 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep.PSW-151. 1994. management, the narrow perspective resulted in heavy grove Such trees may also be of commercial forestry value as a logging for non-sequoia conifers as recently as 1986. seed source if they are blister rust resistant. Aside from their mature sequoias, many groves have To my knowledge, no Sierra
Recommended publications
  • Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed
    • D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report
    Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report Signature: ______________________________ Date: _________________________________ 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias Table of Contents Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias ............................................................................................ 3 Desired Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 4 Giant Sequoias ......................................................................................................................... 5 Mixed Conifer Forest............................................................................................................... 5 Blue Oak–Interior Live Oak (Foothill
    [Show full text]
  • René Voss – Attorney at Law 15 Alderney Road San Anselmo, CA 94960 Tel: 415-446-9027 [email protected] ______
    René Voss – Attorney at Law 15 Alderney Road San Anselmo, CA 94960 Tel: 415-446-9027 [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________________ March 22, 2013 Sent to: [email protected] and [email protected] Penelope Shibley, District Planner cc: Ara Marderosian Kern River Ranger District Georgette Theotig P.O. Box 9, 105 Whitney Road Kernville, CA 93238 Subject: Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project EA Comments for Sequoia ForestKeeper & Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club Ms. Shibley, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project EA. Sequoia ForestKeeper (SFK) and the Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club (SC) are generally supportive of efforts to close or restore areas damaged by OHVs to avert erosion, to deter illegal uses, to protect natural resources, and to reduce user conflict with non-motorized uses. Purpose and Scope of the Project The Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project would implement the closure and restoration of non-system routes within four recreation sites, relocate and restore campsites located within a recreation site (Evans Flat), and reroute portions of two OHV trails; one mile of the Woodward Peak Trail (Trail #32E53) and two miles of the Kern Canyon Trail (Trail #31E75). Three of the four recreation sites (Black Gulch North, Black Gulch South and China Garden) and one of the OHV trails (Kern Canyon Trail #31E75) are located in the Lower Kern Canyon. The fourth recreation site and the second OHV trail (Woodward Peak Trail #32E53) are located within the Greenhorn Mountains near Evans Flat Campground.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 2012 Final Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision Sequoia National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Giant Sequoia Forest Service Sequoia National Monument National Forest August 2012 Record of Decision The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 2012 Final Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision Sequoia National Forest Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Responsible Official: Randy Moore Regional Forester Pacific Southwest Region Recommending Official: Kevin B. Elliott Forest Supervisor Sequoia National Forest California Counties Include: Fresno, Tulare, Kern This document presents the decision regarding the the basis for the Giant Sequoia National Monument selection of a management plan for the Giant Sequoia Management Plan (Monument Plan), which will be National Monument (Monument) that will amend the followed for the next 10 to 15 years. The long-term 1988 Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource environmental consequences contained in the Final Management Plan (Forest Plan) for the portion of the Environmental Impact Statement are considered in national forest that is in the Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherman's March and Georgia's Refugee Slaves Ben Parten Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2017 "Somewhere Toward Freedom:" Sherman's March and Georgia's Refugee Slaves Ben Parten Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Parten, Ben, ""Somewhere Toward Freedom:" Sherman's March and Georgia's Refugee Slaves" (2017). All Theses. 2665. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2665 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “SOMEWHERE TOWARD FREEDOM:” SHERMAN’S MARCH AND GEORGIA’S REFUGEE SLAVES A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts History by Ben Parten May 2017 Accepted by: Dr. Vernon Burton, Committee Chair Dr. Lee Wilson Dr. Rod Andrew ABSTRACT When General William T. Sherman’s army marched through Georgia during the American Civil War, it did not travel alone. As many as 17,000 refugee slaves followed his army to the coast; as many, if not more, fled to the army but decided to stay on their plantations rather than march on. This study seeks to understand Sherman’s march from their point of view. It argues that through their refugee experiences, Georgia’s refugee slaves transformed the march into one for their own freedom and citizenship. Such a transformation would not be easy. Not only did the refugees have to brave the physical challenges of life on the march, they had to also exist within a war waged by white men.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontispiece the 1864 Field Party of the California Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC ROAD GUIDE TO KINGS CANYON AND SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARKS, CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA By James G. Moore, Warren J. Nokleberg, and Thomas W. Sisson* Open-File Report 94-650 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. * Menlo Park, CA 94025 Frontispiece The 1864 field party of the California Geological Survey. From left to right: James T. Gardiner, Richard D. Cotter, William H. Brewer, and Clarence King. INTRODUCTION This field trip guide includes road logs for the three principal roadways on the west slope of the Sierra Nevada that are adjacent to, or pass through, parts of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (Figs. 1,2, 3). The roads include State Route 180 from Fresno to Cedar Grove in Kings Canyon Park (the Kings Canyon Highway), State Route 198 from Visalia to Sequoia Park ending near Grant Grove (the Generals Highway) and the Mineral King road (county route 375) from State Route 198 near Three Rivers to Mineral King. These roads provide a good overview of this part of the Sierra Nevada which lies in the middle of a 250 km span over which no roads completely cross the range. The Kings Canyon highway penetrates about three-quarters of the distance across the range and the State Route 198~Mineral King road traverses about one-half the distance (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoia & Kings Canyon-Volume 1
    Draft National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior General Management Plan and Sequoia and Kings Canyon Comprehensive River Management Plan / National Parks Middle and South Forks of the Environmental Impact Statement Kings River and North Fork of the Kern River Tulare and Fresno Counties California Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index Page intentionally left blank SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS and MIDDLE AND SOUTH FORKS OF THE KINGS RIVER AND NORTH FORK OF THE KERN RIVER Tulare and Fresno Counties • California DRAFT GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index This document presents five alternatives that are being considered for the management and use of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks over the next 15–20 years. The purpose of the Draft General Management Plan is to establish a vision for what Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks should be, including desired future conditions for natural and cultural resources, as well as for visitor experiences. The no-action alternative would continue current management direction, and it is the baseline for comparing the other alternatives (it was originally alternative B when the alternatives were first presented to the public in the winter of 2000). The preferred alternative is the National Park Service’s proposed action, and it would accommodate sustainable growth and visitor enjoyment, protect ecosystem diversity, and preserve basic character while adapting to changing user groups. Alternative A would emphasize natural ecosystems and biodiversity, with reduced use and development; alternative C would preserve the parks’ traditional character and retain the feel of yesteryear, with guided growth; and alternative D would preserve the basic character and adapt to changing user groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Land Records Finding
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior FINDING AID PRIVATE LAND RECORDS 1903-1953 (bulk dates: 1914-1941) Prepared by Beth McDonald National Park Service Catalog Number: SEKI 22572 SEKI 22572 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Copyright and Restrictions …………………………………………………………..…ii History ………………………………………………………………………………….1 Scope and Content ……………………………………………………………………...2 File Unit Descriptions …………………………………………………………………..4 SEKI 22572 ii COPYRIGHT AND RESTRICTIONS The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. The various state privacy acts govern the use of materials that document private individuals, groups, and corporations. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a reproduction if the document does not infringe the privacy rights of an individual, group, or corporation. These specified conditions of authorized use include: • non-commercial and non-profit study, scholarship, or research, or teaching • criticism, commentary, or news reporting • as a NPS preservation or security copy • as a research copy for deposit in another institution If a user later uses a copy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," the user may be personally liable for copyright, privacy, or publicity infringement. This institution's permission to obtain a photographic, xerographic, digital, or other copy of a document doesn't indicate permission to publish, exhibit, perform, reproduce, sell,
    [Show full text]
  • Open As a Single Document
    ILLUSTRATIONS Professor Charles Sprague Sargent in the Arnold Arboretum Library -1904, Plate I, opposite p. 30 Flowers and fruits of the hardy orange, Porrcirus tr;f’oliata. Plate II, p. 35 Map showing absolute minimum temperatures in the Northeastern states from 1926-1940. Plate III, p. 47 Map showing an average length for growing season in the Northeast- ern states. Plate IV, p. 49 Map showing the average July temperature in the Northeastern states for the years 1926 to 1940. Plate V, p. 511 Black walnuts. Plate VI, p. 33 Hickory nuts of various types. Plate VII, p. 57 The native rock elm, Ulmu.r thomasi. Plate VIII, p. 69 The European white elm or Russian elm, Lllmus laenis. Plate IX, p.711 Two varieties of the smoothleaf elm, L’lmus carpinjfolia. Plate X, p. 755 Leaf specimens of various elm species. Plate XI, p. 79 111 . ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 1 MARCH 14, 1941 NUMBER I A SIMPLE CHANGE IN NAME "Bulletin of Popular Information" has always been an un- OURsatisfactory periodical to cite, because of the form of its title, which reads: "Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, Bulletin of Popular Information." Moreover, for no very obvious reason, in the twenty-nine years of its publication it has attamed four series, and for clarity it is necessary to cite the series as well as the volume. In- itiated in May, 1911, sixty-three unpaged numbers form the first series, this run closing in November, 1914. In 1915, a new series was commenced with volume one and was continued for twelve years, closing with volume twelve in December, 1926.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2011-2012 U.S
    National Park Service Visitor Guide: Winter 2011-2012 U.S. Department of the Interior Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks & Sequoia National Forest/Giant Sequoia National Monument Welcome to the Land of Giants In This Issue Bears & food storage .........11 YOU EXPECT GIANT TREES with the U.S. Geological Survey con- All park partners, public and private, Camping ..............................4 and huge canyons—and you won’t duct scientifi c studies on park resourc- cooperate to meet a challenging mis- be disappointed. What may surprise es here. The Sequoia Natural History sion—providing for public enjoyment Exploring on your own: you is that the whole of these parks is Association runs bookstores at visitor while keeping the parks unimpaired Sequoia .............................6 even greater than the sum of its famous centers, then plows those funds into for future generations. You are the Kings Canyon & USFS .......7 parts. park education and research eff orts. most important partner! Experience Another non-profi t, the Sequoia Parks these parks and learn all you can. Your Facilities ............................8-9 Rising from 1300’ to 14,494’ (the high- Foundation, supports important proj- help is needed to preserve and share Lodging ...............................5 est elevation in the lower 48 states), ects, from outreach to trails. these treasured landscapes. these parks protect a spectacular Map ......................................8 elevational range. This span from low to high means dramatic shifts from Snowy Giant Forest and Moro Rock Park ecosystems ...................3 warm foothills to cool forests to the Phone numbers ...................2 cold High Sierra. It means diverse plants and animals living in extremely Ranger programs & varied conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21: Literature: John Muir
    Mount Shasta Annotated Bibliography Chapter 21 Literature: John Muir John Muir's exceptional mental and physical stamina enabled him to rigorously pursue, often in solitary fashion, the exploration of California's mountains. In the Fall of 1874 and the Spring of 1875 he climbed Mt. Shasta three times. Among the entries listed in this section are Muir's pocket notebooks kept during these climbs. His 1875 notebook contains many detailed drawings of the Shasta region. In one case, on April 28, 1875, he drew from the summit of Mt. Shasta a picture depicting an approaching storm, a storm similar to the one which would two days later, on another climb of the mountain, trap him and his climbing partner Jerome Fay on the summit of Mt. Shasta. Also listed in this section are the reports of A. F. Rodgers, who had hired Muir and Fay in the Spring of 1875 to go and take summit barometric readings. Rodgers wrote a fascinating report which vividly details the appearance and condition of Muir and Fay immediately following the overnight ordeal on April 30, 1875. Muir himself wrote stories of the ordeal that were published in several sources, including Harper's Magazine in 1877 and Picturesque California in 1888. Many of Muir's other published works describe Mt. Shasta. His earliest Mt. Shasta writings were a series of five articles printed in the San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin in 1874 and 1875; these have been edited and published by Robert Engberg as part of John Muir: Summering in the Sierra (not the same book as Muir's own book My First Summer in the Sierra).
    [Show full text]
  • Pier Fire Roadside Hazard Tree Mitigation Project Scoping Comments for Sequoia Forestkeeper & Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club
    René Voss – Attorney Natural Resources Law PROTECTING 15 Alderney Road ATURAL San Anselmo, CA 94960 N RESOURCES [email protected] Tel: 415-446-9027 _____________________________________________________________________________ Sent to: March 21, 2018 [email protected] Eric LaPrice – District Ranger cc: Ara Marderosian Amarina Wuenschel – Team Leader Ann Carlson Western Divide Ranger District Chad Hanson 32588 Highway 190 Justin Augustine Springville, CA 93265 Steve Montgomery Subject: Pier Fire Roadside Hazard Tree Mitigation Project Scoping Comments for Sequoia ForestKeeper & Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club Sequoia ForestKeeper (SFK) and the Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club (the Club) thank you for the opportunity to comment. 1. Hazard tree mitigation along roads considered for decommissioning should be dropped In October, 2014, in its attempts to resolve objections to the Tule River Reservation Protection Project (TRRPP), the Forest Service agreed to begin scoping a project to decommissioning six (6) road segments now included in this proposal, stating that “The project will analyze the impacts of decommissioning spur roads No. 21S12B, 21S25A, 21S25B, 21S25C, and 21S25D in the [Black Mountain] grove that do not lead to private property, as well as approximately the last half mile of Road No. 21S25.” Attachment A, p. 1 (Oct. 15, 2014, letter from District Ranger Rick Stevens). Moreover, in his objection decision Forest Supervisor Kevin Elliott stated that “the Forest Service will not implement shaded fuel breaks on any of these road segments pending the completion of the decommissioning project; the shaded fuel breaks will be dropped from the project on any segments selected for decommissioning.
    [Show full text]