DOCSLIB.ORG

Berthoud Pass Mt. Evans Henderson Mine Floyd Hill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Berthoud Pass Mt. Evans Henderson Mine Floyd Hill ST MARYS/ALICE BERTHOUD PASS EMPIRE HENDERSON MINE D.L.D. AREA HIDDEN VALLEY IDAHO SPRINGS GEORGETOWN FLOYD HILL AREA BAKERVILLE SILVER PLUME ECHO MTN TERRAIN PARK LOVELAND SKI AREA GUANELLA PASS MT. EVANS Mining Activity GILPIN COUNTY .! Active Hardrock Mine (DRMS) ST. MARY'S Active Mining Lands Zoned for Mining (M-1, M-2) and Unpatented Mining Claims Fall BLACK HAWK River Rd CENTRAL M CITY ill Cr ee YORK k Rd .! GULCH I¢ .! HENDERSON EMPIRE .! WALSTRUM (FREI) MINE .! QUARRY PHOENIX EDGAR MINE GRAND COUNTY MINE .! ARGO MINE .! Rd lch S Gu S pr g i n IDAHO SPRINGS Is L i tt le GEORGETOWN B FLOYD e a r HILL WXYZw C !"a$ SILVER re e k PLUME R BEAVER BROOK WATERSHED d .! . ECHO HILLS !"a$ LOVELAND WXYZw SKI AREA W it WXYZ` t er G ul ch R d SUMMIT COUNTY Is EVANS d R RANCH s s a P WXYZÌ EVERGREEN a l Upper Bear Creek Rd l e n a u G Y T N U O C MT EVANS N O 4 S GENEVA 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 R BASIN BROOK E FOREST F Miles F E PARK COUNTY J y qilpin2gounty wpF2RFS er2PHQH qrnd2gount wultiple2 se2of2wining2eres wster2ln gler2greek2gountyD2golordo vnds2oned2wEID2wEP2nd2vnds2glssified2s2 winingGwinerl2ixtrtion2y2the2gler2greek2gounty2essessorF roposed2wining2wix qrvel2wining wining2nd2ristori2wining2histrit wining2nd2ypen2pe2nd2eretion wining2nd2edevelopment wining2nd2esidentil G@RH UH y giX DFE gler2greek2gounty2qs @RH nd2ru2essoitesF G UH DFE qilpin2gounty DFEUH tefferson2gounty G@T 34IHQ DFEUH UH DFE UH qrnd2gounty DFE ummit2gounty G@T 34IHQ 8 x2y222r H I P wiles repred2yX his2projet2ws2prtilly2funded2with22grnt2 from2the2tte2of2golordo9s2inergy2nd2winerl2 smpt2essistne2progrm2dministered2y2the heprtment2of2vol2effirsF hislimerX22ell2dt2nd2informtion2@4roduts4A2 ontined2herein2re2for2informtionl2purposes2 onlyF22gler2greek2gountyD2golordo2nd2 ru2essoitesD2snF2provide2these2roduts2 ummit2gounty on2n24s2is42sis2without2wrrnties2of2ny kindF22he2user2knowledges2tht2the2use2of suh2roduts2is2t2the2sole2risk2of2the2userF tnury2SD2PHHR rk2gounty rk2gounty tefferson2gounty GILPIN COUNTY Service Areas & Special Districts Beaver Brook Water & Sanitation Central Clear Creek Sanitation Chicago Creek Sanitation Lookout Mountain ST. Saddleback Metro District MARY'S St Mary's Water and Sanitation Upper Bear Creek Sanitation I¢ Upper South Platte Conservancy GRAND COUNTY Fall River Rd MunicipBaLl BAoCunKda rHiesAWK Emergency Service District Boundary M YORK Clear Creek Metropolitan Recreation District ill Cr ee GULCH Public Lands k Rd Private Lands HENDERSON EMPIRE MINE Rd in h Spr g G lc Is S u IDAHO SPRINGS L GEORGETOWN i FLOYD tt le HILL SILVER WXYZw B e a PLUME r C BEAVER BROOK WATERSHED r e !"a$ e k LOVELAND R d SKI AREA . ECHO HILLS WXYZw W it te r G ul t ch c i R r d t t c s i i r t D d s i R e c D s i Is s v n a r Upper Bear Creek Rd P o e i t a S l c WXYZÌ l e e y t n c o a n r u e P G g r SUMMIT COUNTY e r e i F m E n e k e e r e g r MT EVANS r C e r v a E e GENEVA l BASIN C BROOK 4 FOREST 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles PARK COUNTY Open Space GILPIN COUNTY City of Golden GRAND COUNTY City of Idaho Springs ST. Clear Creek County MARY'S Vasquez James Peak Peak Wilderness Colorado Parks and Wildlife Wilderness Fa BLACK HAWK ll River Rd CENTRAL Denver Mountain Parks M CITY Georgetown ill Cr ee k Rd YORK Historic Georgetown GULCH I¢ Jefferson County Schools Lookout Mountain HENDERSON EMPIRE MINE Private Recreation and Public Purpose Rd Silver Plume lch S Gu S pri g n IDAHO SPRINGS IsState Historical Society State Land Board L i tt le B FLOYD Town of Empire e a HILL GEORGETOWN r WXYZw C U.!"a$S.F.S. SILVER re e k PLUME R BEAVER BROOK WATERSHED d CCC Managed Open Space . Wilderness Boundary USFS Boundary LOVELAND WXYZw ECHO HILLS SKI AREA W itt er G ul ch R d Is EVANS d R Mount Evans RANCH s s a Wilderness Y P WXYZÌ T EVERGREEN a l Upper Bear Creek Rd l e N n a SUMMIT COUNTY U u G O t A s C r e a o r lt National F N p a ho-Rooseve P O i k S e s al Fores MT EVANS R -S tion t a E an el N Is ab F F GENEVA E 4 J BASIN BROOK 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 FOREST Miles PARK COUNTY.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grand County Master Trails Plan
    GRAND COUNTY MASTER TRAILS PLAN PREPARED FOR: Headwaters Trails Alliance July, 2015 CONTACT INFORMATION: Headwaters Trails Alliance Meara Michel, Executive Director Phone: 970.726.1013 Email: [email protected] Web: www.headwaterstrails.org HEADWATERS TRAILS ALLIANCE Master Trails Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAND COUNTY MASTER TRAILS PLAN OVERVIEW...............................................................................................................................1 EXISTING PLANS AND DATA..............................................................................................5 HTA MISSION AND GOALS................................................................................................14 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS................................................................................16 SUBAREA PLANS PLANNING SUBAREAS.......................................................................................................19 WINTER PARK/FRASER AREA.........................................................................................20 OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................20 EXISTING TRAIL CONDITIONS...............................................................................22 STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH SUMMARY..............................................................23 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS........................................................................24 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & BENCHMARKS..............................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • James Peak Wilderness Lakes
    James Peak Wilderness Lakes FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Benjamin Swigle - Aquatic Biologist (Fort Collins/Boulder) [email protected] / 970-472-4364 General Information: The James Peak Wilderness encompasses 17,000 acres on the east side of the Continental Divide in Boulder, Gilpin, and Clear Creek Counties of Colorado. There is approximately 20 miles of trail. The area's elevation ranges from 9,200 to 13,294 feet. Stocking the lakes is primarily completed by CPW pilots that deliver 1 inch native cutthroat trout. Location: Nearby Towns: Nederland, Rollinsville, Tolland, Winter Park. Recreational Management: United States Forest Service Purchase a fishing license: https://www.co.wildlifelicense.com/start.php Fishery Management: Coldwater angling Amenities Sportfishing Notes Previous Stocking High Mountain Hiking 2014 Cutthroat Camping sites available Native Cutthroat Trout Following ice off, trout enter a Backcountry camping 2-3 month feeding frenzy to available with permit June 1 – 2012 fuel themselves over long September 15. Native Cutthroat Trout winters. Consult a quality map for Scuds make up a large portion further information. 2010 of their diet. Primitive restrooms at some Native Cutthroat Trout Fly anglers and spinning rigs trailheads generally offer equal success. 2008 Regulations Native Cutthroat Trout Brook Trout Possession or use of live fish In some James Peak for bait is not permitted. 2006 Wilderness Lakes brook trout Statewide bag/possession Native Cutthroat Trout severely outcompete native limits apply (see
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P
    # # # # # # # # # ######## # # ## # # # ## # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") (!KÂ ) )¬ (! LARAMIE" KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lodg Centennial 4 ep National Federal ole (! 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ Kimball 9 CHEYENNE 11 C 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY reek Bushnell (! 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside (! LARAMIE ! ") Ik ( ") (! ) " Colorado 1 8 (! 1 27 Y S.P. ") Pine !a 2 Ij Cree Medicine Bow 2 KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge R ") " National 34 .P. (! Burns Bluffs k U ") 10 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment (! 7 KEITH 40 Forest (! Red Buttes (! 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 (! DEUEL ") ) " ") 2 ! 6 ") 3 ( Albany ") 9 2 A (! 6 9 ) River 27 6 Ik !a " 1 2 3 6 3 CHEYENNE ") Brule K ") on ") G 4 10 Big Springs Jct. 9 lli ") ) Ik " ") 3 Chappell 2 14 (! (! 17 4 ") Vermi S Woods Landing ") !a N (! Ik ) ! 8 15 8 " ") ) ( " !a # ALBANY 3 3 ^! 5 7 2 3 ") ( Big Springs ") ") (! 4 3 (! 11 6 2 ek ") 6 WYOMING MI Dixon Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") (! (! 6 RA I« 10 ) Baggs Tie Siding " Cre Savery (! ! (! National ") ( 6 O 7 9 B (! 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge (! 4 NEBRASKA (! (! Powder K Res. ^ Home tonwo 2 ^ NE t o o ! C d ! ell h Little En (! WYOMING 3 W p ! 7 as S Tala Sh (! W Slater cam ^ ") Ovid 4 ! ! mant Snake River pm ^ ^ 3 ! es Cr (! ! ! ^ Li ! Gr Mi en ^ ^ ^ ttle eek 8 ! ^JULESBURG een Creek k Powder Wash ddle t ! Hereford (! ! 8 e NORTHGATE 4 ( Peetz ! ! Willo ork K R Virginia Jumbo Lake Sedgwick ! ! # T( ") Cre F ing (! 1 ek Y 7 RA ^ Cre CANYON ek Lara (! Dale B I§ w Big Creek o k F e 2 9 8 Cre 9 Cr x DAGGETT o Fo m Lakes e 7 C T(R B r NATURE TRAIL ") A ee u So k i e e lde d 7 r lomon e k a I« 1 0 Cr mil h k k r 17 t r r 293 PERKINS River Creek u e 9 River Pawnee v 1 e o e ") Carr ree r Rockport Stuc Poud 49 7 r® Dry S Ri C National 22 SENTINAL La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ (! (! k 6 NE e A Gr e Halligan Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolland Ranch Trail Boulder County Application for the Colorado The
    Tolland Ranch Trail Boulder County Application for the Colorado the Beautiful Grant Construction Projects August 1, 2019 EXHIBIT A GRANT APPLICATION CHECK LIST MANDATORY: ☐ Signed letter of resolution from Governing Body ☐ Exhibit A – Application ☐ Exhibit B – Budget (Unprotected Excel CPW form) ☐ Environmental Forms (not required for Regional Trails Planning grants) ☐ Maps/Photographs/Graphics (5 page max, pdf, letter sized pages) ☐ Letters of Support (maximum of 5). No letters from clubs or groups specifically working on the project ☐ Project can be completed within 2.5 years from receiving grant ☐ Required MATCH funding is secured, including CASH match funds ☐ CPW Area Wildlife Manager has been contacted and informed of construction projects by July 1st. Note that ALL projects will be reviewed by CPW for wildlife impacts ☐ (Construction only) Project area is owned by public land agency or has easement that designates the area to be open to public outdoor recreation for at least 25 years ☐ (Construction Only) Formal Environmental Assessment (EA) or NEPA has been completed with final approval for the project area (federal lands only). ADDITIONAL PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS: ☐ Youth Corps or youth organization will be used on the project (TBD: Likely Rocky Mountain Youth Corp. Trail location distance could prohibit Boulder County Youth Corp. We're awaiting final determination). ☐ Volunteers will be utilized on the project (TBD: Likely Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado. The organization has expressed interest in being involved. We have a letter of support, but excluded from the application per instructions). DocuSign Envelope ID: 3578063E-C94C-4DF0-8B13-9BCCFCE1687D Resolution No. 2019-69 A Resolution Supporting the Colorado the Beautiful Grant Application for Construction Projects, a partnership between the Colorado Parks and Wildlife and Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) for the Tolland Ranch Trail Construction Project in Boulder County and Gilpin County, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 107–216—Aug
    PUBLIC LAW 107–216—AUG. 21, 2002 116 STAT. 1055 Public Law 107–216 107th Congress An Act To designate the James Peak Wilderness and Protection Area in the Arapaho Aug. 21, 2002 and Roosevelt National Forests in the State of Colorado, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1576] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, James Peak Wilderness and SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Protection Act. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘James Peak Wilderness and 16 USC 539l. Protection Area Act’’. SEC. 2. WILDERNESS DESIGNATION. (a) INCLUSION WITH OTHER COLORADO WILDERNESS AREAS.— Section 2(a) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘‘(21) Certain lands in the Arapaho/Roosevelt National Forest which comprise approximately 14,000 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘Proposed James Peak Wilderness’, dated September 2001, and which shall be known as the James Peak Wilderness.’’. (b) ADDITION TO THE INDIAN PEAKS WILDERNESS AREA.—Section 3 of the Indian Peaks Wilderness Area and Arapaho National Recreation Area and the Oregon Islands Wilderness Area Act (Public Law 95–450; 92 Stat. 1095; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: ‘‘(c) The approximately 2,232 acres of Federal lands in the Arapaho/Roosevelt National Forest generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Ranch Creek Addition to Indian Peaks Wilderness’ dated September 2001, are hereby added to the Indian Peaks Wilderness Area.
    [Show full text]
  • C Lear Creek GIS C Ounty
    Creek G ilpin C o unty D D D 12147 D Jefferson County G ty Gilpin County rand Coun ICE LAKE D OHMAN LAKE STEUART LAKE D D REYNOLDS LAKE D D 13391 LAKE CAROLINELOCH LOMAND ST MARYS GLACIER Fox Mountain ST MARYS DLAKE FALL RIVER SILVER LAKE D D LAKE QUIVIRA 11239 13130 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR SLATER LAKE D SILVER CREEK SHERWIN LAKECHINNS LAKE Witter Peak D D 12884 D D James Peak Wilderness MEXICAN GULCH D ETHEL LAKEBYRON LAKE D D BILL MOORE LAKE HAMLIN GULCH D D 13132 CUMBERLAND GULCH D MILL CREEK D D Russell Peak Breckinridge Peak Berthoud Pass D D 12889 G D D ilp D in D C D ou n ty D Grand C D D ounty D MAD CREEK LION CREEK D Stanley Mountain YORK GULCH D D FALL RIVER 12521 BLUE CREEK Cone Mountain D D HOOP CREEK 12244 SPRING GULCH Red Elephant Hill D 10316 D ¤£US 40 D CLEAR CREEK This map is visual representation only, do not use Bellevue Mountain URAD RESERVOIR (LOWER) for legal purposes. Map is not survey accurate and ¨¦§I 70 D WEST FORK CLEAR CREEK 9863 Seaton Mountain may not comply with National Mapping Accuracy Red Mountain D D GUANELLA RESERVOIR 9105 12315 EMPIRE n County Standards. Map is based on best available data as Gilpi RUBY CREEK Ball Mountain Douglas Mountain of October, 2018 . BUTLER GULCH CENTRAL CITY D D VIRGINIA CANYON Lincoln Mountain GEORGIA GULCH 12529 9550 OHIO GULCH WOODS CREEK D GILSON GULCH Engelmann Peak 10363 TURKEY GULCH D IDAHO HASSELL LAKEURAD RESERVOIR (UPPER) 13362 BARD CREEK LAKE SILVER CREEK TRAIL CREEK J e US 6 f f ¤£ e r s o BARD CREEK SPRINGS n Flirtation Peak C Robeson Peak Columbia Mountain o ty
    [Show full text]
  • Fsm91 058053.Pdf
    PURPOSE The purposes of ths appendix are to 1) complement information contamed on the evaluation described in Chapter Three, Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences, Roadless Areas, 2) provide a summary of the evaluahon for each roadless area (RA), and 3) provide information on the Roadless Area Review and Evaluahon of 1979 (RARE n) INTRODUCTION Chapter Three provides 1 a legal framework for the RA analysis and evaluation, 2. a descripaon of the process, 3 a table of the RAs analyzed, 4 a table of the evaluation of each RA, and 5. the environmental consequences of the management area allocahons by alternative, based on the Need Assessment analysis. This appendix provides 1 a table of the RAs analyzed for reference, 2 the guidelines used by the Ranger Districts to evaluate roadless areas and determinahons for recommendations for designation, 3 the guidelines used for the detaled analysis and narrative for each RA, 4 the narrative for the James Peak RA, as an example, 5 summary tables of the detaled narratives for each RA, 6 the management area allocations by altemahve for all RAs, and 7 a summary of the RAs considered in the RARE 11 analysis. The detaded narrauves for the individual RAs are part of the Admnistrative Record. ROADLESS AREAS ANALYZED The Revision evaluates 330,230 acres in 38 Roadless Areas (RA), 34 percent of the non- wilderness Forest, for possible recommendations to Congress for designation, as shown below Appendax C I Inventory and Evaluation of Roadless Areas Table C.l Roadless Areas Evaluated in the Revision.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Vegetation of the Colorado Front Range Composition and Dynamics*
    Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range Composition and dynamics* Robert K. Peet** Department of Botany, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill NC 27514, USA Keywords: Colorado, Forests, Front Range, Gradient analysis, Population structure, Rocky Mountains, Succession, Vegetation Abstract The forest vegetation of the northern Colorado Front Range was studied using a combination of gradient analysis and classification methods. A graphical model of forest composition based on elevation and topographic-moisture gradients was constructed using 305 0.1 ha samples. To derive the topographic- moisture gradient, stands were stratified into eight 200 m elevation belts, and then ordinated by correspondence analysis using understory (<1 m) data. Each of the resultant gradients was scaled against a standard site moisture scalar derived from incident solar radiation and topographic position. Except for krummholz sites, the vegetation defined gradients fit the moisture scalar closely. Once scaled, these gradients were stacked vertically, sandwich-style, to create the graphical representation shown in Figure 5. Gradient analysis and ordination (direct and indirect gradient analysis of Whittaker, 1967) are frequently viewed as alternative approaches for analysis of vegetation. With gradient analysis the axes are readily interpretable, but stand placement is often difficult and at times questionable. Ordination defines an optimal arrangement for species and/or stands, but axis interpretation is often impossible. With the present combination of methods, the interpretability of gradient analysis complements the precision of placement obtained with ordination. Forest vegetation was classified by dividing the gradient model into eight series and 29 types on the basis of similar successional trends in canopy dominants. On dry, low-elevation sites above 1 700 m Pinusponderosa woodlands dominate.
    [Show full text]
  • Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland
    Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland Monitoring and Evaluation Report of the 1997 Revision of the Land and Resource Management Plan for Fiscal Year 2013 Table of Contents Forest Certification ............................................................................................................................ iii Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 A brief overview of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Grassland Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 9 A review of the past sixteen years of monitoring by the Forest Monitoring and Evaluation Team Table 4.1 Minimum Legally Required Monitoring Activities Lands Adequately Restocked ............................................................................................................................... 10 Control of Destructive Insects and Diseases ........................................................................................................ 11 Comparison of Projected and Actual Outputs and Services ................................................................................. 12 Table 4.2 Forest Plan Monitoring Questions for Priority Management Emphasis and Stakeholder/Public Involvement. Biological Diversity, Ecosystem Health, Sustainability Air, Soil, Water: Non-point Source Pollution .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]