NYC BIKE SHARE: Designed by New Yorkers Inside This Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
From Planyc to Onenyc: New York's Evolving Sustainability Policy
From PlaNYC to OneNYC: New York's Evolving Sustainability Policy http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-cohen/from-planyc-to-onenyc-n... Edition: US THE BLOG 04/27/2015 08:48 am ET | Updated Jun 27, 2015 Steven Cohen Executive Director, Columbia University's Earth Institute GETTY IMAGES/PHOTOALTO One of the signature accomplishments of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's 12 years as mayor was the development and implementation of New York City's first sustainability plan: PlaNYC 2030. Mayor Bloomberg saw projections of New York's population growth and realized that environmental goals needed to 1 of 7 1/28/2016 12:26 PM From PlaNYC to OneNYC: New York's Evolving Sustainability Policy http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-cohen/from-planyc-to-onenyc-n... be integrated into the city's economic development goals. The plan's focus on measurable accomplishments and frequent performance reporting mirrored the highly successful anti-crime techniques pioneered by the NYPD's CompStat system. Key to the success of PlaNYC was its clear status as a mayoral priority. PlaNYC joined environment to the mayor's top priority of economic development. Last week, we may have seen a similar moment in policy development as Mayor de Blasio linked sustainability to his top goal of poverty reduction. The fact that he is attempting to integrate sustainability with his highest priority is a strong indication that sustainability goals will continue to advance in New York City. The different goals of our very distinct mayors reflect the different conditions they inherited when they assumed office. Mayor Bloomberg took office less than one hundred days after the horror of the World Trade Center's destruction. -
Minutes from the Monthly Meeting of Manhattan Community Board #1 September 27, 2011 Southbridge Towers 90 Beekman Street, Community Room
MINUTES FROM THE MONTHLY MEETING OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD #1 SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 SOUTHBRIDGE TOWERS 90 BEEKMAN STREET, COMMUNITY ROOM Marc Ameruso, Assistant Secretary, will be acting chair pending the arrival of Julie Menin who is attending an event at her children’s school. Anthony Notaro has volunteered to take the minutes until Julie arrives. Marc Ameruso, we will also defer the discussion on the Sukkah issue until then as well as the chairperson’s report. We will start the public session, each speaker has two minutes to speak, if you have not signed up please do so. Public Session: Emma Roszko (Assembly Member Glick) Regarding tour bus situation since opening the 9/11 Memorial, is asking NYPD for more signage and enforcement for idling. DEC hydro-fracking hearing comment period extended for 90 days -- keep in mind with all the flooding from the hurricane what damage could have been caused. John Ricker (NYC Comptroller's Office) Welcome back from summer break. Asked people to look at website www.comptroller.nyc.gov to view financials for all elected officials and impact of Obama’s jobs bill on NYC, also a report on economic trends before and after 9/11. Know of any waste or fraud call their office, 212-669-3916. Edgar Yu (LGBT coordinator for DA's office) this summer, internship program with 38 participants, applications for 2012 will start in January. Hired 41 new ADA's. October is domestic violence awareness month. Mary Cooley (Sen. Squadron). Update on Marriage Equality Act took place August 16th. Updated parent resource guide is available. -
1 Policy Options Brief To: Councilman Ydanis A
Policy Options Brief To: Councilman Ydanis A. Rodriguez, Chairperson of the New York City Council Committee on Transportation; Daryl C. Irick, Acting President of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority From: Kyle Rectenwald and Paul Evans Subject: Detrimental Effects of Limited Transport Access on Low-Income New Yorkers Date: March 23, 2017 Problem: The New Yorkers Who Need Access to Transit the Most Have it the Least New York City’s low-income communities are being severely underserved by the city’s public transportation system. Around 58% of the city’s poorest residents, more than any other income group, rely on the subway and bus systems for transportation (Bendix). Yet for a variety of reasons to be outlined, these residents are being increasingly isolated from access to transit and presented with limited mobility options. Marginalization from the city’s transport network means limited access to the opportunities provided by a vibrant city like New York. This inequitable situation has real, detrimental effects on people’s lives. For one young man, simply getting from his home in West Harlem to attend college in the Bronx requires an hour or more walk every day (Stolper and Rankin 4). For many residents, lack of transport means they are unable to even pick children up from childcare, go grocery shopping, or access basic, fundamental services like hospitals and schools. For the city’s low-income population, limited access to transport is a key factor locking them into a spiral of poverty. As Councilmember David Greenfield recently said, “You can’t get out of poverty if you can’t get to your job” (Foley). -
What Is Citi Bike?
Citi Bike Phase 3 Expansion South Brooklyn October 12, 2020 NYC Bike Share Overview 1 nyc.gov/dot What is Bike Share? Shared-Use Mobility Network of shared bicycles • Intended for point-to-point transportation Increased mobility • Additional transportation option • Convenient for trips that are too far to walk, but too short for the subway or a taxi • Connections to transit Convenience • System operates 24/7 • No need to worry about bike storage or maintenance Positive health & environmental impacts 3 nyc.gov/dot What is Citi Bike? New York City’s Bike Share System Private – Public partnership • NYC Department of Transportation responsible for system planning and outreach • Lyft responsible for day-today operations and equipment • No City funds used to run the system • Sponsorships & memberships fund the system 4 nyc.gov/dot The Station Flexible Infrastructure Easy to install • Stations are not hardwired into the sidewalk/road • Stations are solar powered and wireless • Stations are installed in 1 – 2 hours (no street closure required) Stations can be located on the roadbed or sidewalk Considerations for hydrants, utilities, ADA guidelines, among other factors 5 nyc.gov/dot Citi Bike to Date 7 Years of Citi Bike Citi Bike Launch: Phase 1 • 2013 • Manhattan & Brooklyn • 330 stations • 6,000 bikes Citi Bike Expansion: Phase 2 • 2015 – 2017 • Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens • 750 stations • 12,000 bikes Citi Bike Expansion: Phase 3 • Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx • 2019 – 2024 • + 35 square miles • + 16,000 bikes 6 nyc.gov/dot +17% Growth -
Citi Bike Expansion Draft Plan
Citi Bike Expansion Draft Plan Bronx Community Board 7 – Traffic & Transportation Committee March 4, 2021 NYC Bike Share Overview 1 nyc.gov/dot What is Bike Share? Shared-Use Mobility Network of shared bicycles • Intended for point-to-point transportation Increased mobility • Additional transportation option • Convenient for trips that are too far to walk, but too short for the subway or a taxi • Connections to transit Convenience • System operates 24/7 • No need to worry about bike storage or maintenance Positive health & environmental impacts 3 nyc.gov/dot What is Citi Bike? New York City’s Bike Share System Private – Public partnership • NYC DOT responsible for system planning and outreach • Lyft responsible for day-today operations and equipment • Funded by sponsorships & memberships Citi Bike is a station-based bike share system. Stations: • Can be on the roadbed or sidewalk • Are not hardwired into the ground • Are solar powered and wireless 4 nyc.gov/dot Citi Bike to Date 7+ Years of Citi Bike Citi Bike Launch: Phase 1 • 2013 • Manhattan & Brooklyn • 330 stations • 6,000 bikes Citi Bike Expansion: Phase 2 • 2015 – 2017 • Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens • 750 stations • 12,000 bikes Citi Bike Expansion: Phase 3 • Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx • 2019 – 2024 • + 35 square miles • + 16,000 bikes 5 nyc.gov/dot High Ridership By the Numbers 113+ million trips to date 19.6+ million trips in 2020 5.5+ trips per day per bike ~70,000 daily trips in peak riding months 90,000+ daily rides during busiest days ~170,000 annual members 600,000+ -
New York City Rules! Regulatory Models for Environmental and Public Health
Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2015 New York City Rules! Regulatory Models for Environmental and Public Health Jason J. Czarnezki Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Jason J. Czarnezki, New York City Rules! Regulatory Models for Environmental and Public Health, 66 Hastings L.J. 1621 (2015), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/999/. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles New York City Rules! Regulatory Models for Environmental and Public Health JASON J. CZARNEZKI* Scholars have become increasingly interested in facilitating improvement in environmental and public health at the local level. Over the lastfew years, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the New York City Council have proposed and adopted numerous environmental and public health initiatives, providing a useful case study for analyzing the development and success (or failure) of various regulatory tools, and offering larger lessons about regulation that can be extrapolated to other substantive areas. This Article, first, seeks to categorize and evaluate these "New York Rules," creating a new taxonomy to understanddifferent types of regulation. These "New York Rules" include bans, informational regulation, education, infrastructure,mandates, standard-setting, and economic (dis)incentives. -
Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Improving Bus Service in New York A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Charles Romanow May 2018 Abstract New York City’s transportation system is in a state of disarray. City street are clogged with taxi’s and for-hire vehicles, subway platforms are packed with straphangers waiting for delayed trains and buses barely travel faster than pedestrians. The bureaucracy of City and State government in the region causes piecemeal improvements which do not keep up with the state of disrepair. Bus service is particularly poor, moving at rates incomparable with the rest of the country. New York has recently made successful efforts at improving bus speeds, but only so much can be done amidst a city of gridlock. Bus systems around the world faced similar challenges and successfully implemented improvements. A toolbox of near-immediate and long- term options are at New York’s disposal dealing directly with bus service as well indirect causes of poor bus service. The failing subway system has prompted public discussion concerning bus service. A significant cause of poor service in New York is congestion. A number of measures are capable of improving congestion and consequently, bus service. Due to the city’s limited capacity at implementing short-term solutions, the most highly problematic routes should receive priority. Routes with slow speeds, high rates of bunching and high ridership are concentrated in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn which also cater to the most subway riders. -
135 West 3Rd Street- Restaurant Condominium Tax Block 0543/Lot 1001 Location: the North Side of West 3Rd Street, Between Macdougal Street and Sixth Avenue
135 West 3rd Street 135135 WestWest 3rd3rd StreetStreet Restaurant Condominium For Sale 135 West 3rd Street Confidentiality THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM intended solely for your own limited use in considering whether to pursue negotiations to acquire an interest in 135 West 3rd Street-Restaurant Condo, New York, New York ("The Property"). This Confidential Memorandum contains brief, selected information pertaining to the business and affairs of the Owner, and has been prepared by Massey Knakal Realty Services ("Massey Knakal") Although this Confidential Memorandum has been reviewed by representatives of the Owner, it does not purport to be all inclusive or to contain all of the information which a prospective purchaser may desire. Neither Massey Knakal nor any of their officers, employees or agents make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this Confidential Memorandum or any of its contents, and no legal liability is assumed or to be implied with respect thereto. By acknowledgement of your receipt of the Confidential Memorandum, you agree that the memorandum and its contents are confidential, that you will hold and treat it in the strictest of confidence, that you will not directly or indirectly, disclose or permit anyone else to disclose this memorandum or its contents to any person, firm or entity without prior written authorization of Owner, and that you will not use, or permit to be used, this memorandum or its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interest of Owner. Photocopying or other duplication is strictly prohibited. Owner, Massey Knakal expressly reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to reject any or all proposals or expressions of interest in the building, and to terminate discussions with any party at any time with or without notice. -
Pier 26 at Hudson River Park
BSL CLASSROOM LOCATION GUIDE PIER 26 AT HUDSON RIVER PARK A BIT OF HISTORY FIRST! New York’s newest park, Pier 26 brings together many of the features that make Hudson River Park such a significant resource and destination for New Yorkers and visitors from around the world — unique opportunities to interact with the Hudson River and local ecology, innovative waterfront green space for relaxation and recreation, and unparalleled views of Lower Manhattan and New York Harbor. This 2.5-acre ecologically-themed pier in Tribeca incorporates indigenous plants evocative of Manhattan’s ecosystem prior to human development. A short habitat walk leads visitors through five native ecological zones: woodland forest, coastal grassland, maritime scrub, rocky tidal zone, and of course the Hudson River. Not so long ago, New York Harbor was covered with oyster reefs, so much so that eating oysters was a cheap way to eat out. In the nineteenth century, oysters declined due to over harvesting and water pollution. Today, throughout the Harbor, oysters are starting to make a comeback, mostly as a result of intentional seeding and habitat enhancement projects. In 2017, Hudson River Park’s Science and Education team made a thrilling discovery beneath Pier 25: hundreds of wild oysters on the underside of some pier docks. Oysters are filter feeders that clean waterways. In addition, oyster reefs provide habitat for many species. Brooklyn School of Languages, LLC Email: [email protected] Phone: +1 (646) 341-1219 Social media: @brooklynschooloflanguages -
February 2021 Citi Bike Monthly Report
February 2021 Monthly Report February 2021 Monthly Report Table of Contents Introduction 3 Membership 3 Ridership 3 Environmental Impact 4 Rebalancing Operations 4 Station Maintenance Operations 4 Bicycle Maintenance Operations 4 Incident Reporting 4 Customer Service Reporting 4 Financial Summary 5 Service Levels 5 SLA 1 – Station Cleaning and Inspection 5 SLA 2 – Bicycle Maintenance 5 SLA 3 - Resolution of Station Defects Following Discovery or Notification 6 SLA 3a - Accrual of Station Defects Following Discovery or Notification 6 SLA 4 – Resolution of Bicycle Defects Following Discovery of Notification 6 SLA 4a – Accrual of Bicycle Defects Following Discovery or Notification 6 SLA 5 – Public Safety Emergency: Station Repair, De-Installation, or Adjustment 6 SLA 6 – Station Deactivation, De-Installation, Re-Installation, and Adjustment 7 SLA 7 – Snow Removal 7 SLA 8 – Program Functionality 7 SLA 9 – Bicycle Availability 7 SLA 10 – Never-Die Stations 8 SLA 11 – Rebalancing 8 SLA 12 – Availability of Data and Reports 8 2 The Citi Bike program is operated by NYC Bike Share, LLC, a subsidiary of Lyft, Inc. February 2021 Monthly Report Introduction On average, there were 23,695 rides per day in February, with each bike used 1.44 times per day. 3,975 annual members and 500,698 casual members signed up or renewed during the month. Total annual membership stands at 167,802 including memberships purchased with Jersey City billing zip codes. There were 1,308 active stations at the end of the month. The average bike fleet last month was 15,056 with 16,853 bikes in the fleet on the last day of the month. -
(Citi)Bike Sharing
Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Data Analysis and Optimization for (Citi)Bike Sharing Eoin O’Mahony1, David B. Shmoys1;2 Cornell University Department of Computer Science1 School of Operations Research and Information Engineering2 Abstract to put the system back in balance. This is achieved either by trucks, as is the case in most bike-share cities, or other Bike-sharing systems are becoming increasingly preva- bicycles with trailers, as is being tested in New York. lent in urban environments. They provide a low-cost, environmentally-friendly transportation alternative for Operators of bike-sharing systems have limited resources cities. The management of these systems gives rise to available to them, which constrains the extent to which re- many optimization problems. Chief among these prob- balancing can occur. Hence, this domain is an exciting ap- lems is the issue of bicycle rebalancing. Users imbal- plication for the field of computational sustainability. Based ance the system by creating demand in an asymmet- on a close collaboration with NYC Bike Share LLC, the ric pattern. This necessitates action to put the system operators of Citibike, we have formulated several optimiza- back in balance with the requisite levels of bicycles at tion problems whose solutions are used to more effectively each station to facilitate future use. In this paper, we maintain the pool of bikes in NYC. There is an expanding tackle the problem of maintaing system balance during literature on operations management issues related to bike- peak rush-hour usage as well as rebalancing overnight sharing systems, but the problems addressed here are par- to prepare the system for rush-hour usage. -
COMMUNITY BOARD #1 MANHATTAN RESOLUTION DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1996 COMMITTEE of ORIGIN: TRIBECA COMMITTEE VOTE: 9 in Favor 0 Oppos
COMMUNITY BOARD #1 MANHATTAN RESOLUTION DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1996 COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: TRIBECA COMMITTEE VOTE: 9 In Favor 0 Opposed 0 Abstained BOARD VOTE: 23 In Favor 0 Opposed 3 Abstained RE: Pier 25, installation of 40' iguana BE IT RESOLVED THAT: CB #1 has no objection to the temporary installation of the iguana sculpture on Pier 25 for the 1997 season. COMMUNITY BOARD #1 MANHATTAN RESOLUTION DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1996 COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: TRIBECA COMMITTEE VOTE: 10 In Favor 0 Opposed 0 Abstained BOARD VOTE: 23 In Favor 0 Opposed 0 Abstained RE: Odeon Restaurant, application to review sidewalk cafe BE IT RESOLVED THAT: CB #1 has no objection to the renewal of the sidewalk cafe for the Odeon Restaurant. COMMUNITY BOARD #1 MANHATTAN RESOLUTION DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1996 COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: TRIBECA COMMITTEE VOTE: 10 In Favor 0 Opposed 0 Abstained BOARD VOTE: 24 In Favor 0 Opposed 1 Abstained RE: Site 5B, Revised Exchanges Building BE IT RESOLVED THAT: Having reviewed the proposed presentation, CB #1 makes the following recommendations: 1) That the architectural design be reflective of the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood, rather than the Business/Commercial character of the Financial District. 2) That the Warren St. facade contain retail space to ensure greater transparency activity and safety for the streetscape. 3) Consider programming west side open space with art and sculpture. 4) That traffic signals be installed at the intersection of Murray/Greenwich and Warren/Greenwich. 5) Increase of City Services which will reflect the increase in vehicles and pedestrian traffic, including police, sanitation, traffic, parking and crossing guards.