DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WISCONSIN in RE SPECTRUM BRANDS LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 19-Cv

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WISCONSIN in RE SPECTRUM BRANDS LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 19-Cv Case: 3:19-cv-00347-jdp Document #: 14 Filed: 07/12/19 Page 1 of 135 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) IN RE SPECTRUM BRANDS LITIGATION ) No. 19-cv-347-jdp ) ) AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS RATHJE WOODWARD LLC BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER Douglas M. Poland & GROSSMANN LLP State Bar No. 1055189 Avi Josefson 10 E. Doty Street, Suite 507 875 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 3100 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 Chicago, Illinois 60611 Telephone: (608) 960-7430 Telephone: (312) 373-3880 Facsimile: (608) 960-7460 Facsimile: (312) 794-7801 [email protected] [email protected] Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs The -and- Public School Teachers’ Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and the Katherine M. Sinderson Cambridge Retirement System Jai Chandrasekhar and the Class Julia K. Tebor Matthew Traylor (admission forthcoming) 1251 Avenue of Americas New York, New York 10020 Telephone: (212) 554-1400 Facsimile: (212) 554-1444 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs The Public School Teachers’ Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and the Cambridge Retirement System and the Class Case: 3:19-cv-00347-jdp Document #: 14 Filed: 07/12/19 Page 2 of 135 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................................................................ 2 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ......................................................................................... 9 III. THE PARTIES.................................................................................................................... 9 IV. DEFENDANTS’ FRAUDULENT CONDUCT ............................................................... 13 A. Spectrum, Its Businesses, and Relevant Pre-Class Period Events ........................ 13 B. The Technological and Operational Demands of a Modern Distribution Center .................................................................................................................... 16 C. Defendants Misled Investors During the Class Period About the Purported Success of the GAC and HHI Consolidations ...................................................... 17 D. In Reality, the Consolidations Severely Disrupted Spectrum’s Business............. 21 The GAC Consolidation Was Not “Progressing Smoothly” .................... 21 Material Undisclosed Delays in Consolidating GAC’s Manufacturing Lines and Distribution .......................................... 22 The Dayton Center’s Lack of Basic Infrastructure ....................... 25 The Dayton Center’s Massive Undisclosed Quality-Control Problems ....................................................................................... 29 The Dayton Center’s Inventory-Management Problems .............. 33 The Dayton Center’s Inability to Fill Customer Orders Promptly and Completely ............................................................. 37 The HHI Consolidation Was Not “On Track” .......................................... 38 Delays and Cost Overruns in Consolidating Distribution in Edgerton ........................................................................................ 39 Consolidation Delays at Edgerton Caused Excess Inventory Buildup at the North Carolina, California, and Edgerton Centers .......................................................................................... 42 The Edgerton Center’s Failure to Install Basic Infrastructure ................................................................................. 42 The Edgerton Center’s Incomplete Shipments to Customers ....... 45 i Case: 3:19-cv-00347-jdp Document #: 14 Filed: 07/12/19 Page 3 of 135 The Edgerton Center’s Delayed Shipments to Customers ............ 50 The Edgerton Center’s Undisclosed Hiring, Retention, and Training Problems ......................................................................... 54 The Consolidations’ Undisclosed Impact on Spectrum’s Sales to Walmart and Other Major Retailers .......................................................... 56 The Consolidations’ Undisclosed Adverse Impact on Spectrum’s Ability to Pay Both GAC’s and HHI’s Vendors ....................................... 60 E. The Truth Emerges While Defendants Continue to Mislead Investors ................ 65 Spectrum Discloses That Significant Distribution Center “Challenges” Had Occurred In March 2018, Fires Defendant Rouvé, But Assures The Market That These Issues Are “Transitory” .............................................................................................. 65 Spectrum Again Asserts That Consolidation Issues Are “Transitory” When Reporting Third-Quarter 2018 Earnings ................... 71 In the Days Leading up to Its Fourth-Quarter 2018 Earnings Release, Spectrum Announces Surprise Sale of GAC .............................. 74 November 19, 2018: Spectrum Admits that the Distribution-Center Consolidation Challenges Were Not “Transitory” and Had Ongoing Material Negative Effects on the Company’s Financial Results ....................................................................................................... 75 V. DEFENDANTS’ FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS ..................................................................................................................... 77 A. January-June 2017: Defendants Falsely Claim That The Consolidations Are “On Track” and “Progressing Smoothly” ...................................................... 77 First Quarter 2017 ..................................................................................... 77 Second Quarter 2017................................................................................. 82 B. July 2017-February 2018: Defendants Misleadingly Claim That “Minor” Negative Financial Results Are Partly Attributable to “Temporary” “Transitory” “Normal Startup Inefficiencies” At Dayton and Edgerton .............. 85 Third Quarter 2017 ................................................................................... 85 First Quarter 2018 ..................................................................................... 96 ii Case: 3:19-cv-00347-jdp Document #: 14 Filed: 07/12/19 Page 4 of 135 C. April 2018: Defendants Falsely Claim That Materially Poor Financial Results Are “Transitory in Nature” ..................................................................... 102 D. July 2018: Defendants Falsely Claim That Positive Financial Results Demonstrate That The “Turnaround Is Well Underway” And The Issues Were Transitory” ................................................................................................ 105 VI. ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS OF SCIENTER ......................................................... 110 VII. LOSS CAUSATION ....................................................................................................... 119 VIII. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS ............................................................................... 122 IX. INAPPLICABILITY OF STATUTORY SAFE HARBOR ........................................... 124 X. PRESUMPTION OF RELIANCE .................................................................................. 124 XI. CLAIMS BROUGHT UNDER 10(b) AND 20(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT ........... 125 COUNT I – For Violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 Against Spectrum, Spectrum Legacy, and The Executive Defendants .................................................... 125 COUNT II – For Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act Against The Executive Defendants .................................................................................................................................. 127 COUNT III – For Violations Of Section 20(a) of The Exchange Act Against Defendant HRG Group, Inc. ......................................................................................................................... 128 XII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF ................................................................................................. 129 XIII. JURY DEMAND ............................................................................................................ 130 iii Case: 3:19-cv-00347-jdp Document #: 14 Filed: 07/12/19 Page 5 of 135 Lead Plaintiffs the Public School Teachers’ Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and the Cambridge Retirement System, by and through their undersigned counsel, bring this action pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf themselves and all other persons or entities who purchased securities of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. or HRG Group, Inc. during the period from January 26, 2017 to November 19, 2018, inclusive (the “Class Period”) and were damaged thereby (the “Class”).1 Lead Plaintiffs allege the following based upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their own acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters. Lead Plaintiffs’ information and belief are based on the ongoing investigation of their counsel, including from the following sources: (i) Spectrum Legacy’s, HRG’s, and Spectrum’s public filings with the SEC; (ii) research reports from securities and financial analysts; (iii) Spectrum Legacy’s, HRG’s, and Spectrum’s press releases and reports; (iv) Company website and marketing materials; (v) news and media reports concerning Spectrum Legacy, HRG, and Spectrum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Warranties in the Void
    Warranties in the void A survey of warranties from 50 companies finding that 45 void warranties for independent repair. As companies’ warranties wear thin, it underscores the need for Right to Repair reforms. October, 2018 Warranties in the Void A survey of warranties from 50 companies finding that 45 void warranties for independent repair. As companies’ warranties wear thin, it underscores the need for Right to Repair reforms. October, 2018 Written by: Nathan Proctor, U.S. PIRG Education Fund With help from David Peters, American University Special thanks to: George Slover, Consumers Union Gay Gordon-Byrne, Repair.org DISCLAIMER: The contents of this report express the opinion of its authors and U.S. PIRG Education Fund and are not intended as legal advice. The authors of this report are not legal advisers, and this report is not expressing a legal opinion. The report is the product of an academic inquiry into the topic of consumer rights and warranties, and should therefore not be used in any legal capacity. Cover Image Credit: Andrew Cosand, Creative Commons Executive Summary You buy something, but it breaks or doesn’t work right. So you bring it back to the company that sold it to you to get fixed. Sometimes they fix it -- they want to make sure the customer is happy. But sometimes, they won’t. Nearly all appliances or electronic devices come with some form of written warranty to clarify when repairs would be covered, and under what conditions. When manufacturers choose to provide written or “express” warranties, there are laws that govern how they work.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file No. 001-13615 SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 22-2423556 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 601 Rayovac Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53711 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (608) 275-3340 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer and Retail
    CONSUMER AND RETAIL INDUSTRY UPDATE │ JUNE 2017 www.harriswilliams.com Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is a private limited company incorporated under English law with its registered office at 5th Floor, 6 St. Andrew Street, London EC4A 3AE, UK, registered with the Registrar of Companies for England and Wales (registration number 7078852). Harris Williams & Co. Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. CONSUMER AND RETAIL INDUSTRY UPDATE │ JUNE 2017 HARRIS WILLIAMS & CO. CONSUMER UPDATE The consumer sector continued to evolve during the past quarter as brands, retailers, GROUP OVERVIEW and e-commerce companies continue to adapt to shifts in consumer preferences and buying habits. Over the past three months, we have continued to see this play out in Harris Williams & Co. is a leading advisor to the Consumer market. Our both M&A activity and valuations. The traditional brick and mortar retailers continue to significant experience covers a broad venture outside of historical business lines and acquire additional e-commerce DNA with range of end markets, industries, and deals announced by the likes of Walmart, PetSmart, and Target among others. At the business models. This particular report same time, traditional e-commerce companies are pursuing brick and mortar strategies focuses on trends and metrics in the following areas: to either solve perceived last mile issues or better control the overall consumer and brand experience (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report Spectrum Brands Holdings 2
    PROGRESS STEADY 2016 ANNUAL REPORT SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS 2 Spectrum Brands Holdings is a global consumer products company offering an expanding portfolio of leading brands providing superior value to consumers and customers every day. NET SALES FY2016 With fiscal 2016 net sales of $5.04 billion, we are a $5,040 leading worldwide supplier of consumer batteries, residential locksets, $4,429 $4,690 residential builders’ hardware, plumbing, shaving and grooming GLOBAL BATTERIES products, personal care products, small household appliances, specialty 40% & APPLIANCES pet supplies, lawn and garden and home pest control products, personal insect repellents and auto care products. Our products are well-known, widely trusted and available at major retailers in HARDWARE & approximately 160 countries on six continents. Our brands are largely 25% HOME IMPROVEMENT non-discretionary, non-premium priced, home-related, replacement packaged goods used by consumers daily. GLOBAL PET SUPPLIES 16% We are headquartered in Middleton, Wisconsin 10% HOME & GARDEN and have approximately 15,700 employees in 53 countries. Our FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 manufacturing and product development facilities are located in the 9% GLOBAL AUTO CARE United States, Europe, Latin America and Asia. ($ in millions) ADJUSTED FREE MARKET EBITDA(a) FY2016 CASH FLOW CAPITALIZATION(b) $953 18.9% $535 $8,180 $801 GLOBAL BATTERIES $724 17.1% 33% & APPLIANCES $454 16.4% $359 $5,436 HARDWARE & $4,772 25% HOME IMPROVEMENT 16% GLOBAL AUTO CARE 15% GLOBAL PET SUPPLIES FY2016 FY2016 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2014 FY2015 15% HOME & GARDEN FY2014 FY2015 ($ in millions) (% = margin) -4% CORPORATE ($ in millions) ($ in millions) (b)At fiscal year-end (a) Includes $28 million, $28 million and $33 million of corporate/unallocated expenses in fiscal years 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Spectrum Brands, Inc. File No.: 1-05-Cv-2494-Wsd Securities Litigation
    Case 1:05-cv-02494-WSD Document 18-1 Filed 02/02/2006 Page 1 of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA (ATLANTA) IN RE SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC. FILE NO.: 1-05-CV-2494-WSD SECURITIES LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS Case 1:05-cv-02494-WSD Document 18-1 Filed 02/02/2006 Page 2 of Table of Contents Page 1. NATURE OF THE ACTION ................................................................ 1 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 3 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ........................................................... 6 IV. THE PARTIES ......................................................................................7 A. Lead Plaintiffs .............................................................................7 B. Defendants ..................................................................................7 V. DEFENDANTS' FRAUDULENT SCHEME ...................................... 8 A. "We Always Find a Way to Make the Quarter ......................... 8 B. Defendants' Clear View of the Retail Channel ........................13 C. Defendants Fail to Reveal a Material Adverse Trend ..............23 D. Acquisitions: Defendants' Light at the End of the Tunnel .......26 VI. FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS ..................................29 VII. THE TRUTH BEGINS TO EMERGE ............................................... 38 VIII. POST CLASS PERIOD EVENTS ......................................................46
    [Show full text]
  • Form 8-K Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K ​ CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 11, 2018 SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) ​ Delaware 1-4219 74-1339132 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) ​ ​ 3001 Deming Way Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 (Address of principal executive offices) ​ (608) 275-3340 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Not applicable (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report) ​ Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ​ ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§232.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter). Emerging growth company ☐ I​ f an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. - SPB
    Personal Products Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. - SPB Spectrum Brands Hlds – SPB Buy – Target: $150.00 Current Price: $117.77 Company Introduction: Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a suite of global consumer products in ~160 countries. They sell batteries, appliances, door locks, plumbing and hardware parts, pet food and supplies, auto care products, insect and weed solutions. They recently sold their battery brands to Energizer for $2 billion in cash. Investment Thesis • Strategic sale of a low margin business for $2 billion in cash. • 24% short interest, high likelihood they are about to get squeezed. We believe the recent sale of their battery brands to Energizer is the start of a trend that will improve margins and growth rates. Their battery brands had some of the smallest growth rates in Spectrum’s suite of brand offerings, and management has stated that their intention is to use proceeds to improve leverage and pursue growth opportunities. The Start of the Opportunity: 60% of SPB is currently owned by HRG Group, Inc. (HRG). This has made SPB much more volatile and too risky for many investors. On December 17th & 19th, HRG issued two v letters to SPB proposing an integration of the two Source: Bloomberg, JWC Research corporate structures and a payment of $200 million Weekly Chart from SPB in exchange for the use of HRG’s net operating losses of $1.5 billion and additional board representation. SPB replied with minor tweaks to the payments and no additional board representation. On January 18, 2018, SPB postponed their shareholder meeting due to discussions with HRG “regarding a potential strategic transaction.” We believe a simplified structure is on its way with a lock up period for all parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Products Update May 2021
    p \ Consumer Products Update May 2021 The Mufson Howe Hunter Consumer Products Update is designed to update business leaders, investors and industry professionals on current market trends and important developments within the consumer products sector of the economy. This report contains information on select companies in various subsectors within consumer products emphasizing financial performance, stock performance and M&A transactions. Primary Mufson Howe Hunter Contacts: Anthony J. Lopez-Ona Managing Director 215.399.5405 [email protected] Michael J. Mufson Managing Director 215.399.5410 [email protected] Brandon K. Eck Managing Director 215.399.5411 [email protected] Michael J. Howe Managing Director 215.399.5413 [email protected] Joseph M. Manko, Jr. Managing Director 215.399.5402 [email protected] Mufson Howe Hunter & Company LLC is a middle-market focused investment bank providing M&A, capital raising and financial advisory services. Member SIPC | FINRA MHH Sectors TABLE OF CONTENTS Cleaning and Bath Products Consumer Products Group Summary ................................ ................................ ... 1 Décor Cleaning and Bath Products .................................................................................. 5 Furniture Déco r ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 9 Hardware and Outdoor Furniture ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 13 Household Appliances Hardware and Outdoor .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fed. Circ. Says PTAB Correctly Axed Eveready Battery Patent by Bonnie Eslinger
    Portfolio Media. Inc. | 111 West 19th Street, 5th Floor | New York, NY 10011 | www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 | Fax: +1 646 783 7161 | [email protected] Fed. Circ. Says PTAB Correctly Axed Eveready Battery Patent By Bonnie Eslinger Law360, Los Angeles (May 31, 2016, 8:02 PM ET) -- The Federal Circuit on Tuesday affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision to invalidate all claims of an Eveready Battery Co. patent that were challenged by rival Spectrum Brands, finding evidence that the Eveready battery makeup was similar to a previously patented European battery. In its ruling, the three-judge appellate panel concurred with a board examiner’s decision holding the challenged claims invalid for “obviousness” when considering the prior art found in the European patent’s application. "In light of the evidence before the board, we hold that substantial evidence supports the board’s finding," the Federal Circuit said. Tuesday’s decision is the latest twist in a long-running patent dispute between Energizer Holdings Inc, the parent company of Eveready Battery Co., and Spectrum Brands Inc., the maker of Rayovac batteries. In October 2008, Energizer won a permanent injunction barring Spectrum from importing Rayovac- brand lithium batteries from China and two months later the two companies reached a confidential settlement in the patent dispute. But after the termination of that case, Spectrum filed a petition for an inter partes reexamination of one of the two patents that had been at issue, Eveready’s U.S. Patent No. 6,849,360 for features of an Energizer lithium battery product.
    [Show full text]
  • TOP 100 RETAILERS and CONSUMER GOODS COMPANIES Here’S a Partial List of Companies Who’Ve Previously Attended MODEX
    TOP 100 RETAILERS AND CONSUMER GOODS COMPANIES Here’s a partial list of companies who’ve previously attended MODEX. Top 100 Retailers Office Depot Danone 7-Eleven Petco Animal Supplies Diageo PLC Ace Hardware PetSmart Dr Pepper Snapple Group Albertsons Companies Publix Super Markets Estée Lauder Companies Aldi Qurate Retail Group (formerly QVC) General Mills Amazon Rite Aid GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Apple Stores / iTunes Ross Stores Healthcare Army & Air Force Exchange Royal Ahold Delhaize USA Grupo Bimbo Ascena Retail Group Save-A-Lot Hanesbrands AT&T Wireless Sears Holdings Hasbro, Inc. AutoZone Sherwin-Williams Heineken Holding N.V. Bass Pro Staples Henkel AG Bed Bath & Beyond Starbucks Herbalife Ltd. Belk Target Hershey Co. Best Buy The Home Depot Hormel Foods Big Lots The Kroger Co. Husqvarna AB BJ’s Wholesale Club TJX Companies ITC Ltd. Burlington Coat Factory Toys “R” Us J.M. Smucker Co. Chick-fil-A Tractor Supply Co. Johnson & Johnson Costco True Value Co. Kao Corp. CVS Health Corporation Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Kellogg Co. Dick’s Sporting Goods Verizon Wireless Kimberly-Clark Corp. Dillard’s Wakefern / ShopRite Kraft Heinz Dollar General Walgreens Boots Alliance L’O r é a l Dollar Tree Walmart Mattel, Inc. Domino’s Pizza Wegmans Food Market McCormick & Co. Exxon Mobil Corporation WinCo Foods MolsonCoors Brewing Co. Foot Locker Mondelez International GameStop Top 100 Consumer Goods Nestlé SA Gap Companies Newell Brands Giant Eagle 3M Co. Nike, Inc. H-E-B Grocery AB Electrolux Nintendo Co. Hobby Lobby Stores Adidas AG PepsiCo Hy-Vee Anheuser-Busch InBev Pernod Ricard IKEA Asahi Group Holdings Post Holdings J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer and Retail
    CONSUMER AND RETAIL INDUSTRY UPDATE │ MARCH 2017 www.harriswilliams.com Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is a private limited company incorporated under English law with its registered office at 5th Floor, 6 St. Andrew Street, London EC4A 3AE, UK, registered with the Registrar of Companies for England and Wales (registration number 7078852). Harris Williams & Co. Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. CONSUMER AND RETAIL INDUSTRY UPDATE │ MARCH 2017 HARRIS WILLIAMS & CO. CONSUMER UPDATE CONSUMER Q1 UPDATE - CONTINUED MOMENTUM ACROSS SECTORS GROUP OVERVIEW Harris Williams & Co. is a leading The first quarter of each year is always a busy period and 2017 has been no different for advisor to the Consumer market. Our the HW&Co. Consumer team. The year started with a strong slate of deals that touched significant experience covers a broad each of our key focus sectors: (i) consumer products, (ii) food and beverage, (iii) range of end markets, industries, and business models. This particular report consumer services, and (iv) retail and restaurants. While market stats and metrics point focuses on trends and metrics in the to fewer closed consumer deals in the quarter, we continue to see strong global interest following areas: in high quality consumer companies and brands at valuations that remain at or above historical highs. Valuations have been particularly high for companies that are either .
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum Brands Holdings Updates Asset Sale Processes
    Spectrum Brands Holdings Updates Asset Sale Processes November 15, 2018 Signs Agreement to Sell Global Auto Care Business to Energizer Holdings, Inc. for $1.25 Billion in Cash and Equity Amends Agreement with Energizer Holdings, Inc. to Address Potential European Commission Remedy, Including a Potential Adjustment to the $2 Billion Purchase Price of up to $200 Million for Sale of Global Battery and Lighting Business Reclassifies Appliance Business as Consolidated Operations MIDDLETON, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 15, 2018-- Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SPB), a global consumer products company offering a broad portfolio of leading brands and focused on driving innovation and providing exceptional customer service, today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Global Auto Care (GAC) business to Energizer Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ENR) in a transaction valued at $1.25 billion. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the second fiscal quarter of 2019. The $1.25 billion transaction value is comprised of $937.5 million of cash and $312.5 million of Energizer Holdings Inc. equity. “The GAC business is a terrific complement to Energizer’s existing auto care business, and they have the resources and capabilities to increase investment to further grow the business,” said David Maura, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum Brands Holdings. “Energizer is a highly respected operator, and we believe they will be a great steward of the GAC business and its employees, while allowing us to delever and focus on our remaining businesses.” Spectrum Brands also announced today that it has entered into an amended acquisition agreement with Energizer for the previously announced sale of its Global Battery and Lighting Business, to address a proposed remedy that Energizer has submitted for consideration to the European Commission (EC) for review, including a potential downward adjustment to the purchase price of up to $200 million.
    [Show full text]