DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Oregon Department of Human Services Office of Child Welfare Programs Annual Progress & Service Report 2017 Covering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of Oregon Department of Human Services Office of Child Welfare Programs Annual Progress & Service Report 2017 Covering State of Oregon Department of Human Services Office of Child Welfare Programs Annual Progress & Service Report 2017 Covering activities from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016 Dr. Reginald C. Richardson, Deputy Director Department of Human Services 500 Summer Street NE, E67 Salem, OR 97301-1067 Submitted in June 2016 Resubmitted August 2016 Link: http://www.oregon.gov/dhs/children/Pages/publications/index.aspx Date of posting: Dependent upon CB approval data Questions regarding this report should be directed to Annajean Goins (503) 945-6897 or Sherril Kuhns, (503) 945-6679. Page 2 of 112 Table of Content Subject Page 1. General Information Collaboration ………………………………………………………………………… 5 2. Update on Assessment of Performance ……………………………………….... 6 3. Update on Plan for Improvement and Progress Made to Improve Outcomes 6 Plan for Improvement …………………………………………………………………..... 7 Goals, Objectives, Interventions, Progress and Benchmarks …………………. 7 Implementation Supports …………………………………………………………… 39 Progress Made to Improve Outcomes ………………………………………………….. 42 Feedback Loop (involved or impacted by intervention) ……………………….. 43 Update on the Title IV-E Foster Care Program Improvement Plan …………. 44 4. Update on Service Description …………………………………………………… 44 Title IV-B, Part 1 ……………………………………………………………………. 44 Title IV-B, Part 2 ……………………………………………………………………. 44 CFCIP and ETV …………………………………………………………………….. 45 Any expansion of existing services ………………………………………………… 51 Populations at greatest risk for maltreatment …………………………………… 52 Services for Children under Five …………………………………………………. 54 Services for children adopted from other countries ……………………………. 55 5. Program Support …………………………………………………………………………. 55 Training and technical assistance provided ……………………………………… 55 Anticipated capacity building needs ……………………………………………… 56 Any QA, research, evaluation, management information systems implemented since 2016 APSR …………………………………………………… 56 6. Consultation and Coordination between States and Tribes …………………… 56 7. Monthly caseworker visit Formula Grants ……………………………………… 64 8. Adoption and Legal Guardianship Incentive Payments ……………………….. 64 9. Waiver Demonstration Activities ………………………………………………… 65 10. Quality Assurance System ……………………………………………………….. 66 11. CAPTA State Plan Requirements and Update …………………………………. 66 12. CFCIP ……………………………………………………………………………… 76 National Youth in Transition Database ………………………………………….. 100 Homeless Prevention ………………………………………………………………… 101 Consultations with Tribes …………………………………………………………… 104 Education and Training Voucher Program ……………………………………… 104 13. Targeted Plans within the 2015-2019 CFSP ……………………………………. 106 Foster and Adoptive Parent Diligent Recruitment Plan ……………………….. 106 Health Care Oversight and Coordination Plan ………………………………… 108 Disaster Plan ………………………………………………………………………… 108 Training Plan ………………………………………………………………………… 109 14. Financial Information ………………………………………………………….… 111 Payment Limitations – Title IV-B, Subpart 1 Page 3 of 112 Payment Limitations – Title IV-B, Subpart 2 FY 2016 Funding – Revised CFS-101 Budget Request. FY 2017 Budget Request – CFS-101, Parts I and II 15. Attachments …………………………………………………………………… 112 1. Statewide Assessment, March 25, 2016 2. State Plan Assurances, Governor’s letter 3. CAPTA Panel Final Recommendations 4. Department Response 5. FCFIP Collaborations Chart 6. C3 Mission 7. Chafee OR NYTD Cohort (two documents 8. Chafee ILP Provider Annual Report 9. Chafee Graduation Rates 10. Chafee Household Expectations draft document 11. Homeless and Runaway Youth Provider Map 12. Home and Runaway Youth Advisory Committee 13. Chafee ETV Chart 14. Chafee Performance Based Contract Monthly Report 15. State Disaster Plan 16. State Training Plan 17. CFS-101 Part I 18. CFS-101 Part II 19. CFS-101 Part III 20. Signed CFS 101 Page 4 of 112 1. General Information Collaboration The following individuals provided administrative data and other information included in this report and/or reviewed drafts and provided input into the item narratives. The DHS Tribal Affairs manager authored the ICWA sections of this report. Each of the Department staff listed below contributed information, review, data, or feedback during the preparation of this annual report. Clyde Saiki, Director, Department of Human Services Dr. Reginald Richardson, Deputy Director, Department of Human Services Jason Walling, Deputy Director, Office of Child Welfare Programs, DHS Ryan Vogt, Deputy Chief Operating Officer, DHS Stacy Lake, Safety Program Manager, OCWP, DHS Stacey Ayers, Safety Program Manager, OCWP, DHS Kathy Prouty, Permanency Program Manager, OCWP, DHS Lacey Andresen, Title IV-E Waiver Program Manager, OCWP, DHS Kevin George, Well Being Program Manager, OCWP, DHS Laurie Price, Well Being Program Manager, OCWP, DHS Rosemary Iavenditti, Independent Living Program Coordinator, OCWP, DHS Sherril Kuhns, Federal Policy, Planning and Resources, OCWP, DHS Angela Skyberg, OR-Kids Business Manager, OCWP, DHS Vera James, ICPC Manager, DHS Karyn Schimmels, Training Manager, OCWP, DHS Nadja Jones, Tribal Affairs Director, Senior ICWA Manager, DHS Matthew Rasmussen, HRY Coordinator Billy Cordero, Foster Care Coordinator Melanie Parent, Foster Care Coordinator Catherina Stelzer, Education Coordinator Page 5 of 112 Leola McKenzie, Director, Juvenile Court Improvement Program Conor Wall, Data Analyst, Juvenile Court Improvement Program Zachary Hackett, Training Specialist, Child Welfare Training Unit Anna Cox, Data Collection and Reporting Manager, OBI, DHS Judy Helvig, Research Analyst, OBI, DHS Kathryn Wolf, Research Analyst, OBI, DHS Jeremy Lecoure, Research Analyst, OBI, DHS Eloise Rasmussen, Research Analyst, OBI, DHS A draft of the 2017 APSR was provided to each of the child welfare management groups and each of the child welfare advisory committees listed here and each was offered the opportunity to provide input, feedback, edits, or corrections to the draft report prior to finalization. These partner groups will be involved in the development of the Program Improvement Plan at the conclusion of the Round 3 CFSR review process and will monitor the progress made on Department strategies and activities to improve child and family outcomes. These advisory and programmatic groups meet at regularly scheduled times and locations, some monthly, some bi- monthly, and some quarterly throughout the year. Child Welfare District Managers Child Welfare Program Managers Child Welfare Office Managers Parent Advisory Committee Child Welfare Governance Child Welfare Advisory Committee Indian Child Welfare Advisory Committee 2. Update on Assessment of Performance Please see Attachment 1, the Statewide Assessment, prepared in conjunction with the Round 3 CFSR for current information on Oregon’s assessment of performance. Page 6 of 112 3. Update on Plan for Improvement and Progress Made to Improve Outcomes Plan for Improvement Over the past year, Oregon has seen significant changes. With the high profile closure of one of Oregon’s contracted foster care providers, other media attention, and several legal actions, the Department is undergoing significant change. The two, tenured senior administrators have left the agency. The search for a new child welfare director is currently underway. The Department is undergoing structural changes that will result in a single line of responsibility and authority over both child welfare program and child welfare field administration services. Oregon is midway through the Round 3 Child and Family Services Review, having completed the self-assessment in March, 2016 and currently in month 3 of the six month self- conducted case review process. Oregon is aware of the need for improvement and has made the decision to focus on three primary areas of child welfare practice in the state plan over the next 12 months. These primary focus areas are reflected in the revised objectives, strategies and outcome measures. The outcome measures, in large part are the measures the Department is incorporating into the Quarterly Business Review (QBR process) and the ongoing review of the CFSR case review outcome measures. The three primary areas of focus are: Assessing and managing safety throughout the life of the case (Please see Goal 1 for additional information.) Improved timeliness to permanency through data driven system analysis and improved case planning and service delivery (Please see a revised Goal 2, which incorporates the case review Well Being measures.) Increasing safe substitute care capacity (Please see a revised Goal 3, which focuses the statewide efforts to improve Oregon’s capacity to increase both Department certified foster care resources and contracted placement resources for children with complex needs.) Oregon will continue the work of increasing racial equity within child welfare. (Goal 4) All of these areas of focus will be driven through a continuous quality improvement lens, in order to both understand the root causes of needed system improvements and to sustain lasting change in child welfare outcomes for children and families. (Goal 5) Goals, Objectives, Interventions Page 7 of 112 Goal 1: Safety: Children in Oregon who come to the attention of child welfare will be protected from abuse and neglect and will be safely maintained in their homes, whenever possible and appropriate. Objective 1: Implement case practice improvements regarding safety planning during the CPS process. Key Activities: 1. Conduct screening fidelity reviews in every District (including both calls assigned and those
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notice of Project Scoping Meeting by the City of Chula Vista
    NOTICE OF PROJECT SCOPING MEETING BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA has called and will convene a public project scoping meeting as summarized below: PROJECT: Environmental Impact Report (EIR20-0001) for the Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital PURPOSE: Solicit public comment on the type and extent of the environmental analyses to be performed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), such as: Land Use, Aesthetics, Air Quality, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Public Services, Transportation/Circulation, and Wildlife. DATES: August 31 to September 29, 2020 online (see review and commenting instructions below) The purpose of a public scoping meeting is to inform the public that the lead agency, the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department (DSD), is evaluating a project under CEQA and set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21065 to solicit public comment regarding the type and extent of environmental analyses to be undertaken. At the scoping stage, DSD describes the preliminary concept of the project, and asks for public feedback regarding the scope of the EIR. Under normal circumstances, public scoping meetings are held in a public location in the community near the location of the proposed project. Pursuant to the Governor of the State of California's executive order N-29-20, and in the interest of the public health and safety, the public may participate virtually in this project scoping meeting. HOW TO REVIEW THE PRESENTATION: Members of the public will be able to access a link to watch a pre- recorded presentation via livestream at https://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/development- services/planning/public-notices/virtual-meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1991 Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park William Henry Stiver University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Stiver, William Henry, "Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1991. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2517 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by William Henry Stiver entitled "Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. Michael R. Pelton, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Boyd L. Dearden, James L. Schmidhammer Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by William Henry Stiver entitled "Population Dynamics and Movements of Problem Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park." I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Guidelines for African Lion Panthera Leo Class
    Husbandry Guidelines For (Johns 2006) African Lion Panthera leo Class: Mammalia Felidae Compiler: Annemarie Hillermann Date of Preparation: December 2009 Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Course Name: Certificate III Captive Animals Course Number: RUV 30204 Lecturer: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld, Brad Walker DISCLAIMER The information within this document has been compiled by Annemarie Hillermann from general knowledge and referenced sources. This document is strictly for informational purposes only. The information within this document may be amended or changed at any time by the author. The information has been reviewed by professionals within the industry, however, the author will not be held accountable for any misconstrued information within the document. 2 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS Wildlife facilities must adhere to and abide by the policies and procedures of Occupational Health and Safety legislation. A safe and healthy environment must be provided for the animals, visitors and employees at all times within the workplace. All employees must ensure to maintain and be committed to these regulations of OHS within their workplace. All lions are a DANGEROUS/ HIGH RISK and have the potential of fatally injuring a person. Precautions must be followed when working with lions. Consider reducing any potential risks or hazards, including; Exhibit design considerations – e.g. Ergonomics, Chemical, Physical and Mechanical, Behavioural, Psychological, Communications, Radiation, and Biological requirements. EAPA Standards must be followed for exhibit design. Barrier considerations – e.g. Mesh used for roofing area, moats, brick or masonry, Solid/strong metal caging, gates with locking systems, air-locks, double barriers, electric fencing, feeding dispensers/drop slots and ensuring a den area is incorporated.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 17 Index: 70 Mm, 35 Mm, and 16 Mm Photographs
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) Preparation, Scanning, Editing, and Conversion to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) by: Ronald A. Wells University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 May 2000 A P O L L O 1 7 I N D E X 7 0 m m, 3 5 m m, A N D 1 6 m m P H O T O G R A P H S M a p p i n g S c i e n c e s B r a n c h N a t i o n a l A e r o n a u t i c s a n d S p a c e A d m i n i s t r a t i o n J o h n s o n S p a c e C e n t e r H o u s t o n, T e x a s APPROVED: Michael C .
    [Show full text]
  • ADAPTATION of FORESTS and PEOPLE to CLIMATE Change – a Global Assessment Report
    International Union of Forest Research Organizations Union Internationale des Instituts de Recherches Forestières Internationaler Verband Forstlicher Forschungsanstalten Unión Internacional de Organizaciones de Investigación Forestal IUFRO World Series Vol. 22 ADAPTATION OF FORESTS AND PEOPLE TO CLIMATE CHANGE – A Global Assessment Report Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on Adaptation of Forests to Climate Change Editors: Risto Seppälä, Panel Chair Alexander Buck, GFEP Coordinator Pia Katila, Content Editor This publication has received funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, the United Kingdom´s Department for International Development, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, and the United States Forest Service. The views expressed within this publication do not necessarily reflect official policy of the governments represented by these institutions. Publisher: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) Recommended catalogue entry: Risto Seppälä, Alexander Buck and Pia Katila. (eds.). 2009. Adaptation of Forests and People to Climate Change. A Global Assessment Report. IUFRO World Series Volume 22. Helsinki. 224 p. ISBN 978-3-901347-80-1 ISSN 1016-3263 Published by: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) Available from: IUFRO Headquarters Secretariat c/o Mariabrunn (BFW) Hauptstrasse 7 1140 Vienna Austria Tel: + 43-1-8770151 Fax: + 43-1-8770151-50 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.iufro.org/ Cover photographs: Matti Nummelin, John Parrotta and Erkki Oksanen Printed in Finland by Esa-Print Oy, Tampere, 2009 Preface his book is the first product of the Collabora- written so that they can be read independently from Ttive Partnership on Forests’ Global Forest Expert each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Miscellany
    Literary Miscellany Chiefly Recent Acquisitions. Catalogue 316 WILLIAM REESE COMPANY 409 TEMPLE STREET NEW HAVEN, CT. 06511 USA 203.789.8081 FAX: 203.865.7653 [email protected] www.williamreesecompany.com TERMS Material herein is offered subject to prior sale. All items are as described, but are considered to be sent subject to approval unless otherwise noted. Notice of return must be given within ten days unless specific arrangements are made prior to shipment. All returns must be made conscientiously and expediently. Connecticut residents must be billed state sales tax. Postage and insurance are billed to all non-prepaid domestic orders. Orders shipped outside of the United States are sent by air or courier, unless otherwise requested, with full charges billed at our discretion. The usual courtesy discount is extended only to recognized booksellers who offer reciprocal opportunities from their catalogues or stock. We have 24 hour telephone answering, and a Fax machine for receipt of orders or messages. Catalogue orders should be e-mailed to: [email protected] We do not maintain an open bookshop, and a considerable portion of our literature inventory is situated in our adjunct office and warehouse in Hamden, CT. Hence, a minimum of 24 hours notice is necessary prior to some items in this catalogue being made available for shipping or inspection (by appointment) in our main offices on Temple Street. We accept payment via Mastercard or Visa, and require the account number, expiration date, CVC code, full billing name, address and telephone number in order to process payment. Institutional billing requirements may, as always, be accommodated upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OBSERVER the Astronomy Club of Tulsa’S NewsleEr Published Since 1937
    THE OBSERVER The Astronomy Club of Tulsa’s Newsleer Published Since 1937 RON WOOD NETA APPLE JOHN LAND JACK EASTMAN CLYDE GLANDON UNDERSTANDING FILTERS AND WHAT FILTER WHEN NASA’S LRO FINDS PROFF OF LIFE ON OKIE‐TEX ROUNDUP! CLUES TO THE MILKY WAYS PAST www.astrotulsa.com All Rights Reserved Copyright 2011 Astronomy Club of Tulsa. OCTOBER 2011 EDITORS NOTES THE COVER As always I am pleased to present another issue of the Observer. This month I would like to welcome back a writer many of you already know, Neta Ap‐ ple. For those of you who were not with the club when Neta was a member you are not aware of what we lost when Neta moved away. She was always deep‐ ly involved with all of our out reach and a great teacher. Neta is a good friend of mine as well as many others in the club and geng her to write for the Observer again did not take much coaxing to my surprise. Neta has that personality that just wants to help when astronomy is involved. Starng this month the Observer will honor great astronomers throughout history. This will be in the She also asked that I let all of you who did not get boom right hand corner of the cover and your to go to Okie‐Tex know how much she misses our challenge is to guess who it is before you open to club and wishes she could come back. We miss her this page and find the answer. as well. This month we begin with Thales (624‐547 B.C., Thanks for the arcle Neta and we hope this is just Ionian) he was a Greek philosopher who traveled the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Rogue River Watershed Analysis Marial To
    United States zz on-A.-A Sc~t.'s Department ' S~~s, -. i'-Va/ of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region . United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region 1999 ROGUE RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS MARIAL TO AGNESS ITERATION 1.0 I have read this analysis and find it meets the Standards and Guidelines for watershed analysis required by the Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (USDA and USDI, 1994). Signed: /s/Michael Frazier Date: September 24, 1999 District Ranger Gold Beach Ranger District Siskiyou National Forest TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Introduction 1 Key Findings 3 Aquatic Ecosystem Narrative 5 Riparian Ecosystem Narrative 31 Terrestrial Ecosystem Narrative 39 Social Aspects Narrative 57 Appendix A - Subwatersheds Appendix B - Maps References List of Preparers LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page Table 1 Land Ownership 1 Table 2 Management Areas 2 Table 3 Subwatersheds by US Geologic Service Hydrologic Unit Code 2 Table 4 Geologic Rock Types 6 Table 5 Rogue River Water Quality Limited Segments 14 Table 6 Water withdrawal Permits for Rogue River Tributaries Streams and 17 Springs Table 7 Timber Harvest and Roads by Watershed Analysis Areas 19 Table 8 7- Day Average Maximum Temperature 22 Table 9 Riparian Condition 37 Table 10 Distribution of Interior Late-Successional Forest Blocks within the 41 Rogue River (Marial to Agness) watershed. Table 11 Special Habitat Sites 42 Table 12 Habitat Trends for Selected Indicator Species 46 Table 13 Historic Elk Habitat (1940) 47 Table 14 Current Elk Habitat (1995) 47 Table 15 Road Closures 51 Table 16 Potential Candidates for Seasonal or Permanent Closure 52 Table 17 Roads List 73 Table 18 Roads Summary 73 INTRODUCTION The Rogue River Watershed Analysis, Marial to Agness, Iteration 1.0, was initiated to analyze the aquatic, terrestrial, and social resources of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C. Solomon , Larry R. Nittler , Brian J. Anderson Index More Information INDEX 253 Mathilde, 196 BepiColombo, 46, 109, 134, 136, 138, 279, 314, 315, 366, 403, 463, 2P/Encke, 392 487, 488, 535, 544, 546, 547, 548–562, 563, 564, 565 4 Vesta, 195, 196, 350 BELA. See BepiColombo: BepiColombo Laser Altimeter 433 Eros, 195, 196, 339 BepiColombo Laser Altimeter, 554, 557, 558 gravity assists, 555 activation energy, 409, 412 gyroscope, 556 adiabat, 38 HGA. See BepiColombo: high-gain antenna adiabatic decompression melting, 38, 60, 168, 186 high-gain antenna, 556, 560 adiabatic gradient, 96 ISA. See BepiColombo: Italian Spring Accelerometer admittance, 64, 65, 74, 271 Italian Spring Accelerometer, 549, 554, 557, 558 aerodynamic fractionation, 507, 509 Magnetospheric Orbiter Sunshield and Interface, 552, 553, 555, 560 Airy isostasy, 64 MDM. See BepiColombo: Mercury Dust Monitor Al. See aluminum Mercury Dust Monitor, 554, 560–561 Al exosphere. See aluminum exosphere Mercury flybys, 555 albedo, 192, 198 Mercury Gamma-ray and Neutron Spectrometer, 554, 558 compared with other bodies, 196 Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer, 558 Alfvén Mach number, 430, 433, 442, 463 Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, aluminum, 36, 38, 147, 177, 178–184, 185, 186, 209, 559–561 210 Mercury Orbiter Radio Science Experiment, 554, 556–558 aluminum exosphere, 371, 399–400, 403, 423–424 Mercury Planetary Orbiter, 366, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, ground-based observations, 423 556–559, 560, 562 andesite, 179, 182, 183 Mercury Plasma Particle Experiment, 554, 561 Andrade creep function, 100 Mercury Sodium Atmospheric Spectral Imager, 554, 561 Andrade rheological model, 100 Mercury Thermal Infrared Spectrometer, 366, 554, 557–558 anorthosite, 30, 210 Mercury Transfer Module, 552, 553, 555, 561–562 anticline, 70, 251 MERTIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotary Club of Warrnambool Chartered 75 Years
    CENTENARY OF ROTARY 1905-2005 ROTARY CLUB OF WARRNAMBOOL CHARTERED 75 YEARS FOREWORD The preparation of this update has necessitated the use of material prepared for earlier Anniversaries. In particular, material was extracted from a number of souvenir booklets. The earliest was titled Rotary Club of Warrnambool 1929- 1959. Another similar booklet was titled; Rotary Club of Warrnambool 1929- 1979, whilst the most recent was a supplement within the Warrnambool Standard titled; Rotary Club of Warrnambool 1930 – 1990 60th Anniversary. Further historical information as provided by Past President, Ron Rauert. The preparation of material from 1990 to the present was greatly facilitated by access to a private collection of Annual Reports. Other material was gleaned from R.I. World Conference literature. It will be obvious from a reading of this latest publication that considerably more detailed information has been provided in the summary of each Rotary year since 1990. This should not be interpreted that less activity occurred in pre-1990 Rotary years but that earlier publications, particularly the Standard insert, were constrained by available space. Some paragraphs within this update provide general information about Rotary such Objects of Rotary, Rotary International, Rotary Foundation, Group Study Exchange, Ambassadorial Scholarships and the significance of the design of the Rotary Wheel. It was considered that this information was essential in the Centenary Year of Rotary. The assistance of Club photographer, John Reid, Iris Bickley and former Rotarian Doreen Risbey, and her Business studies students at S.W. Institute of TAFE, in the preparation of this history update, is thankfully acknowledged. Special mention is made of our printing team, Rotarians Ian Cairns and Gary Parsons, who, with their knowledge and use of hi-tech equipment, very graciously produced this publication.
    [Show full text]