DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Historic District Nomination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Historic District Nomination NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Financial Historic District (Amendment and Boundary Increase) Other names/site number: ______________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: _15th Street from Pennsylvania Avenue on the south to K Street on the north to 14th and G Streets on the east___________________________________________ City or town: ____________ State: ____________ County: ____________ Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X__ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national ___statewide _X__local Applicable National Register Criteria: _X__A ___B _X__C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date ______________________________________________ State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Financial Historic District (Amendment) Washington, D.C. Name of Property County and State In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official: Date Title : State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government ______________________________________________________________________________ 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ____________________________________________________________________________ 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: X X Public – Local X X Public – State Public – Federal Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) X X X District X X Site Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Financial Historic District (Amendment) Washington, D.C. Name of Property County and State Structure Object Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing ____36_________ ______2_______ buildings _____________ _____________ sites _____________ _____________ structures _____________ _____________ objects _____36________ ______2________ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register __33_______ ____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) COMMERCE/TRADE/Office Building/Financial Institution/Specialty Store______ SOCIAL/Clubhouse_________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) _COMMERCE/TRADE/Office Building/Financial Institution/Specialty Store_______ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ Sections 1-6 page 3 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Financial Historic District (Amendment) Washington, D.C. Name of Property County and State ______________________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions.) _20th CENTURY AMERICAN MOVEMENTS/Classical Revival/Stripped Classical/Renaissance Revival/Commercial Style/Gothic Revival__________________ _MODERN__________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ Materials: (enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: _Brick and Limestone________________ Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary Paragraph The Financial Historic District is an amended nomination to the Fifteenth Street Financial Historic District listed in the National Register in 2006.1 This nomination offers modified boundaries that extend beyond the linearly defined 15th Street Historic District and that better reflect the city’s financial nodes as they evolved from the nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century. As described in the 1984/2006 nomination, the Fifteenth Street Financial Historic District was designated principally for its cohesive array of monumental Beaux Arts-style buildings constructed by the city’s thriving financial industry along 15th Street between Pennsylvania Avenue on the south and I Street on the north. The listed district includes 20 buildings2 that are linked aesthetically by proximity to the U.S. Treasury Building and are 1 The 15th Street Financial Historic District was determined eligible for listing in the National Register in 1984, but due to owner objection it was not listed. Over the course of two decades, the Historic Preservation Office worked with the owners to have them lift their objections, and in 2006 the 15th Street Financial Historic District was listed. 2 When the National Register Nomination for the Fifteenth Street Financial Historic District was prepared in 1984, the district included 22 buildings as noted in the nomination. By the time that the historic district was actually designated in 2006, two of the twenty-two buildings had been demolished (Rhodes Tavern and 1510 H Street NW). As it stands today, there are 20 buildings within the boundaries of the Fifteenth Street Financial Historic District (NR listing, 2006). Section 8 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Financial Historic District (Amendment) Washington, D.C. Name of Property County and State notable both individually and as an ensemble of 20th-century Beaux Arts Classicism. As described in the 1984/2006 nomination, the district is monumental in feeling, symbolically expressing the solidarity and pride of the leading financial institutions in the District of Columbia during the first decades of the twentieth century. This amended nomination, which adds 18 buildings to the historic district, maintains the visual unity of the designated Fifteenth Street Historic District yet also gives a more accurate and complete picture of the city’s financial history. The expanded district is broader in both its physical boundaries and historic context and better reflects the variety and growth of the city’s financial industry from the 19th century to the mid-20th century. As indicated by its amended name—the Financial Historic District—the boundaries are no longer limited to the buildings along 15th Street, but include two other important collections of financially related buildings, namely those at the intersection of 14th and G Streets and those around McPherson Square. The new boundaries remain the same on the southern end, but reach further east along G Street to 14th Street, and further north along 15th Street to the north side of K Street, north of McPherson Square. On the east, the district has been increased to include an important clustering of 20th-century office and bank buildings at the intersection of 14th and G Streets, including the exuberant Colorado and Bond office buildings, two of the first Beaux Arts office buildings in downtown, and three important commercial bank buildings. The district extends further north beyond I Street
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1025 15Th Street NW
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE * * * HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION New Designation X Amendment of a previous designation Please summarize any amendment(s) ______________________ Propertyname~T=h=e~E=th=e=l=h=m=s=t ________________________________________________ Ifan y part ofthe interior is being nominated, it must be specifically identified and described in the narrative statements. Address 1025 151h Street N.W. Square and lot number(s) -'="S~qu=a=r=e=2-"-16"'--"==L=o!:....t0=0=2=6'--------------------- Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commission .!.-'AN:=....:....:C::::....=2~F______________________________ _ Date of construction 1902 Date ofmajor alteration(s)______________ _ Architect(s) T. Franklin Schneider Architectmal style(s) .::::B~ea=u~x!....:Art~~s _________ Original use Residence/Multi-Family Present use Commercial/Office Property owner Honeybee Hospitality LLC Legal address of property owner 1842 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20009 NAME OF APPLICANT(S) Megan Merrifield, Honeybee Hospitality LLC (owner) If the applicant is an organization, it must submit evidence that among its purposes is the promotion of historic preservation in the District of Columbia. A copy of its charter, articles of incorporation, or by-laws, setting forth such purpose, will satisfy this requirement. Address/Telephone ofapplicant(s) 1842 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20009 (757) 553-7906 Name and title of authorized representative Stu.- M AILvalA f'(2.E.SEfl..l{A]ol\/ PLAtv'NE~ 1 ~ _. .. OA. e.ttT"ftz.A<,G~es Signature of representative -vv'?[J & Date AP!1.Jt.. 10, Z.OI'-J Name and telephone of author of application Gray O'Dwyer, EHT Traceries (202) 393-1199 D>te ,~,;,oo ~ l?'J'/ { H.P.O.statf -~ ~~~ '\.1\ Office of Planning, II 00 4'h Street, SW, Suite E650, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Price Riggs Paid
    REPUTATION DAMAGE: The Price Riggs Paid A Case Study prepared by World-Check, the market pioneer and industry standard for PEP screening and customer due diligence — serving over 1,600 financial institutions and government agencies in more than 120 countries, including 45 of the world’s 50 largest financial institutions. © 2006 World-Check (Global Objectives Ltd) All Rights Reserved. For permission to re-publish in whole or part please email [email protected] World-Check is a registered trademark. Reputation Damage: ‘ The Price Riggs Paid’ CONTENT: Section Page FOREWORD: By David B. Caruso Former Executive Vice President of Compliance & Security at Riggs Bank INTRODUCTION: RIGGS: ‘Things fall apart’ 1 UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES AT RIGGS: 2 TWO LEADERS, TOO MANY? 2 • RIGGS & PINOCHET 2 • RIGGS & OBIANG 3 PRIOR TO ITS ‘PRESIDENTIAL PROBLEMS’ 4 THE SAUDI ARABIAN DIPLOMATIC ACCOUNTS 4 THE RESULTS: 5 SHAREHOLDER SUITS AND FINES. 5 RENEGOTIATING THE MERGER. 8 UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTS: 8 REPUTATION FALLOUT 8 TIMELINE 10 LESSONS TO BE LEARNT 11 WORLD-CHECK: AN OVERVIEW FOREWORD by David B. Caruso Former Executive Vice President of Compliance & Security at Riggs Bank Riggs is a story about the price paid when an Anti-Money Laundering ("AML") compliance program lacks proper oversight by management and the board of directors. As you will read in this paper the outcome of such failure in the case of Riggs was rather dramatic and as in any good drama there were lots of twists and turns in the various plots and sub-plots. Who could have imagined that one, relatively small bank in Washington DC, could have participated in the questionable financial activities of two of the more notorious dictators of the last quarter century? One of the many thing my staff and I learned over the two years we were at Riggs busy trying to build a compliance program and ultimately uncovering almost all of the facts you'll read about in this paper, is how harmless most poor business decisions seem at the time they are made.
    [Show full text]
  • WRITTEN STATEMENT of RIGGS BANK N.A. to the PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE on INVESTIGATIONS of the COMMITTEE on GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS Of
    WRITTEN STATEMENT OF RIGGS BANK N.A. to the PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS of the COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS of the UNITED STATES SENATE July 15, 2004 I. Introduction. Riggs Bank has been privileged to serve the banking needs of our nation’s capital for nearly two centuries. During that time, Riggs has served such historical figures as President Abraham Lincoln and American Red Cross founder Clara Barton. Riggs also has assisted in some important historical transactions, such as supplying the gold for the purchase of the State of Alaska. Today, Riggs is the oldest independent bank headquartered in Washington, D.C., serving the District and the surrounding metropolitan area with more than 45 branch locations. Without a doubt, this past year has been among the most challenging in the Bank’s long and storied history. We will address today some of those challenges and how the Bank is moving to address them, and will address questions raised in the letter from Chairman Coleman and Senator Levin. Looking back, it is clear that Riggs did not accomplish all that it needed to. Specifically, with respect to the improvements that were outlined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) in its examinations, Riggs deeply regrets that it did not more swiftly and more thoroughly complete the work necessary to meet fully the expectations of its regulators. For this, the Bank accepts full responsibility. Looking forward, Riggs is acting forcefully to comply with all federal rules and regulations and is cooperating as fully as possible with all appropriate agencies and congressional committees looking into these matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinochet US Bank Accounts Under Scrutiny LADB Staff
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiSur Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 7-23-2004 Pinochet US Bank Accounts Under Scrutiny LADB Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/notisur Recommended Citation LADB Staff. "Pinochet US Bank Accounts Under Scrutiny." (2004). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/notisur/13279 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiSur by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 52339 ISSN: 1089-1560 Pinochet US Bank Accounts Under Scrutiny by LADB Staff Category/Department: Chile Published: 2004-07-23 Money laundering and involvement in Operation Condor came up as potential points of prosecution against former Chilean dictator Gen. Augusto Pinochet (1973-1990) this month, as a scandal involving US-based Riggs Bank unfolded. Chilean President Ricardo Lagos received assurances from US President George W. Bush that there would be "a full investigation" of how the ex-dictator hid millions with the bank's help. The 88-year-old Pinochet has faced renewed legal fights since a Chilean appeals court stripped him of his immunity in May of this year (see NotiSur, 2004-06-18), though his defenders argue that his advanced age makes him unfit to stand trial. Riggs Banks accused of helping launder A US Senate committee report said the Washington-based Riggs Bank helped Pinochet hide his assets over an eight-year period, even after he was arrested in London in 1998 and a court froze his assets (see NotiSur, 1998-10-23).
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Post Company 2003Annual Report
    The Washington Post Company 2003 Annual Report Contents Financial Highlights 01 To Our Shareholders 02 Corporate Directory 16 Form 10-K FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (in thousands, except per share amounts) 2003 2002 % Change Operating revenue $ 2,838,911 $ 2,584,203 + 10% Income from operations $ 363,820 $ 377,590 – 4% Net income Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in 2002 $ 241,088 $ 216,368 + 11% After cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in 2002 $ 241,088 $ 204,268 + 18% Diluted earnings per common share Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in 2002 $ 25.12 $ 22.61 + 11% After cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in 2002 $ 25.12 $ 21.34 + 18% Dividends per common share $ 5.80 $ 5.60 + 4% Common shareholders’ equity per share $ 217.46 $ 193.18 + 13% Diluted average number of common shares outstanding 9,555 9,523 – Operating Revenue Income from Operations Net Income ($ in millions) ($ in millions) ($ in millions) 03 2,839 03 364 03 241 02 2,584 02 378 02 204 01 2,411 01 220 01 230 00 2,410 00 340 00 136 99 2,212 99 388 99 226 Diluted Earnings Return on Average Common per Common Share Shareholders’ Equity ($) 03 25.12 03 12.3% 02 21.34 02 11.5% 01 24.06 01 14.4% 00 14.32 00 9.5% 99 22.30 99 15.2% 01 The Washington Post Company The undramatic financial results of 2003—earnings per share a bit higher than last year’s—mask a year in which some important things happened at The Washington Post Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Historic District
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking “x” in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter “N/A” for “not applicable.” For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Financial Historic District other names 2. Location 15th Street (west side) from Pennsylvania Avenue on the south to K Street street & number on the north; 14th Street at G Street on the east side. not for publication city or town Washington, D.C. vicinity state code DC county code zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of Riggs Bank, NA
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF No. 2004-01 RIGGS BANK, N.A. ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY I. INTRODUCTION The Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury has delegated to the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) the authority to determine whether a financial institution has violated the Bank Secrecy Act, 31 USC §§5311 et seq. and 31 CFR Part 103 thereunder (“BSA”), and what, if any, sanction is appropriate. In order to resolve this matter, and only for that purpose, Riggs Bank N.A. (“Riggs”) has entered into a CONSENT TO THE ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY (“CONSENT”) dated May 13, 2004, without admitting or denying FinCEN’s determinations described in Sections III and IV below, except as to jurisdiction in Section II below, which is admitted. The CONSENT is incorporated into this ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY (“ASSESSMENT”) by this reference. II. JURISDICTION Riggs is the principal subsidiary of Riggs National Corporation, a publicly traded bank holding company based in Washington, D.C. As of December 31, 2003, Riggs had assets of approximately $6 billion, deposits of $4.29 billion, and stockholders’ equity of $427.2 million. Riggs is a “financial institution” and a “bank” within the meaning of 31 USC §5312(a)(2) and 31 CFR §103.11. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) is Riggs’ primary federal supervisory agency and examines Riggs for BSA compliance. III. FINDINGS A. Summary of Violations FinCEN has determined that Riggs willfully violated the suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting requirements of the BSA and its implementing regulations, and that Riggs has willfully violated the anti-money laundering program (“AML program”) requirement of the BSA and its implementing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saudi Money Trail Rent Payments for 9-11 Hijackers and Mysterious Checks from a Princess's Account
    MSNBC.com Mobile Advertisement The Saudi Money Trail Rent payments for 9-11 hijackers and mysterious checks from a princess's account. Is there a Saudi tie to terror? Inside the probe the Bush administration doesn't want you to know about Dec. 2 issue — When the two Qaeda operatives arrived at Los Angeles International Airport around New Year's 2000, they were warmly welcomed. Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar would help hijack American Airlines Flight 77 and crash it into the Pentagon a year and a half later, but that January in Los Angeles, they were just a couple of young Saudi men who barely spoke English and needed a place to stay. AT THE AIRPORT, THEY were swept up by a gregarious fellow Saudi, Omar al-Bayoumi, who had been living in the United States for several years. Al-Bayoumi drove the two men to San Diego, threw a welcoming party and arranged for the visitors to get an apartment next to his. He guaranteed the lease, and plunked down $1,550 in cash to cover the first two months' rent. His hospitality did not end there. Al-Bayoumi also aided Alhazmi and Almihdhar as they opened a bank account, and recruited a friend to help them obtain Social Security cards and call flight schools in Florida to arrange flying lessons, according to law-enforcement officials. Two months before 9-11, al-Bayoumi moved to England; several months later, he disappeared. He is believed to be somewhere in Saudi Arabia. MYSTERY MAN Who is al-Bayoumi? At various times, the affable father of four told people that he was getting his doctorate at San Diego State, though the school has no record he ever attended.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission November 18, 2008, Designation List 407 LP-2247 GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY of AMERICA
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 18, 2008, Designation List 407 LP-2247 GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ANNEX, 105 EAST 17TH STREET, (aka 105–117 East 17th Street and 108–116 East 18th Street), Manhattan. Built 1959–63; Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, architects; Roger Radford, designer. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 873, Lot 10. On April 10, 2007, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the former Guardian Life Insurance Company of America Annex and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 13). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Eleven people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of State Senator Tom Duane, Community Board No. 5, DoCoMoMO, Gramercy Park Neighbors, Historic District Council, Modern Architecture Working Group, Municipal Art Society, and Union Square Community Coalition. A representative of the owner expressed no opposition to designation. The Commission has also received numerous letters in support of designation. Summary The Guardian Life Insurance Company Annex is a rare example of a low-rise office building in Manhattan shaped by the aesthetics of 20th Century European Modernism, frequently called the International Style. Four stories tall, it was designed in the New York City office of the architects Skidmore, Owings & Merrill and features a crisp curtain wall of anodized aluminum spandrel panels and tinted glass. Work on the project began in 1959 and construction was completed in 1963. Though Guardian Life contemplated moving during the 1950s, objections from community groups in Westchester County and staff persuaded the company to remain in Manhattan and erect an annex of substantial dimensions directly east of the company’s 1911 neo- classical-style headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Undue Diligence: How Banks Do Business with Corrupt Regimes
    UNDUE DILIGENCE How banks do business with corrupt regimes A report by Global Witness, March 2009 CONTENTS Summary 03 1 Introduction: 07 Breaking the links between banks, corruption and poverty 2 Who is your customer? 17 3 Riggs and Equatorial Guinea: 26 Doing business with heads of state (Plus: Where did Equatorial Guinea’s oil money go after the demise of Riggs?) 4 Barclays and Equatorial Guinea: 40 Doing business with the sons of heads of state, Part I (Plus: Who banks for President Bongo of Gabon since Citibank closed its doors to him?) 5 Bank of East Asia and Republic of Congo: 50 Doing business with the sons of heads of state, Part II 6 Citibank, Fortis and Liberia’s logs of war: 68 Doing business with natural resources that are fuelling conflict 7 Deutsche Bank and Turkmenistan: 82 Doing business with a human rights abuser 8 Oil-backed loans to Angola: 90 Doing business with an opaque national oil company 9 The problem with the Financial Action Task Force 105 10 Conclusions and recommendations 112 Glossary 124 SUMMARY Economic crisis: banks have damaged the world’s richest economies, but by facilitating corruption they help perpetuate poverty in the world’s poorest countries. What is the problem? which deny these countries the chance to lift The world has learnt during 2008 and 2009 themselves out of poverty and leave them that failures by banks and the governments dependent on aid. that regulate them have been responsible for pitching the global economy into its This is happening despite a raft of anti-money worst crisis in decades.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BANK of the METROPOLIS, 31 Union Square West A/K/A 19-23 East 16Th Street, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission July 12,1988; Designation List 206 LP-1537 THE BANK OF THE METROPOLIS, 31 Union Square West a/k/a 19-23 East 16th Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1902-1903; architect, Bruce Price; builder, George Fuller Company. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 844, Lot 17. On May 14, 1985, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Bank of the Metropolis (Item No. 3). The hearing was continued to September 17, 1985 (Item No. 1). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Forty-two witnesses spoke in favor of designation. One witness took no position. The Commission received several letters in support of designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Summary A limestone-faced bank and office tower, the Bank of the Metropolis, a columnar tripartite skyscraper, is a representative example of the major New York architect Bruce Price's neo­ Renaissance commercial architecture. The design incorporates classical elements which were traditionally associated with American bank architecture. Notable features include the bowed two-story portico with monumental polished granite columns, lions' heads, consoles, foliated spandrels and spandrels with open-mouthed lions. Built in 1902-1903, 1 the bank occupies a commanding corner location on Union Square West and demonstrates the arch~tect's ability to adapt a building to both the requirements of function and the dictates of site. Created to serve the needs of businesses on the square, the bank had members of the local business community on its board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received SEP 2 6 Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic Riggs - Tompkins Building and/or common The Riggs National Bank 14th & Park Road Branch 2. Location_________________ 3300, 3306-16, 3328 street & number 1403~05, 1413 Park Road NW; 3336 14th Street NW not for publication Walter £. Fauntroy, delegate city, town Washington vicinity of state District of Columbia code 11 county N/A code 001 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum X building(s) X private unoccupied X commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: apartments 4. Owner of Property name Park Road Limited Partnership street & number Four Faneuil Hall Marketplace city, town Boston vicinity of state Massachusetts 02109 S>. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Recorder of Deeds street & number 51S D Street NW Room 304 20001 city, town Washington state District of Columbia 6. Representation in Existing Surveys________ 1) Request for Determination of Eligibility (state and federal) title National Register of Historic Places has this property been determined eligible? _JL_yes __no 2) District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites (local) date federal: 8/30/84 state: 12/23/82 local: 6/26/85-*- federal Estate county _X_ local Historic Preservation Division, Department of Consumer and Regulat- depository for survey records orv Affairs 61 4 H Street NW Room city, town Washington state Pi strict of Columbia 2000T 7.
    [Show full text]