Achieving Biodiversity Gains in Conjunction with Land Use Change
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SORGHUM BIOCHEMISTRY: an INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVE This Page Intentionally Left Blank SORGHUM BIOCHEMISTRY: an INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVE
SORGHUM BIOCHEMISTRY: AN INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVE This page intentionally left blank SORGHUM BIOCHEMISTRY: AN INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVE C.V. RATNAVATHI ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India J.V. PATIL College of Agriculture, Pune, Maharashtra, India U.D. CHAVAN Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India AMSTERDAM• BOSTON• HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK• OXFORD• PARIS• SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, UK 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA 50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK Copyright r 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. -
Vegetation of Imbota and Yina Nature Reserves, Armidale, New South Wales
Vegetation of Imbota and Yina Nature Reserves, Armidale, New South Wales John T. Hunter School of Behavioural, Cognative and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] Abstract: The vegetation of Imbota Nature Reserve (30° 35’S, 151° 45’E) (218 ha in area), 10 km south-east of Armidale, and Yina Nature Reserve (30° 29’S, 151° 45’E), (101 ha in area), 10 km east of Armidale, on the Northern Tablelands, NSW, is described. Based on classification analyses, air photo interpretation and ground-truthing, seven vegetation communities are described and mapped : 1. Eucalyptus caliginosa (Broad-leaved Stringybark) Grassy Forest and Woodland on deep soils at Imbota 2. Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) Grassy Forest and Woodland, Community 3. Eucalyptus caliginosa (Broad-leaved Stringybark) Grassy Forest and Woodland on shallow soils at Imbota 4. Eucalyptus caliginosa (Broad-leaved Stringybark) Grassy Forest and Woodland at Yina 5. Eucalyptus blakelyi (Blakely’s Red Gum) – Eucalyptus melliodora (Yellow Box) Woodland 6. Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) – Eucalyptus nova-anglica (New England Peppermint) Grassy Forest and Woodland 7. Riparian Herbfields 252 vascular plant taxa (from 59 families) were recorded from the two reserves, 179 species in Imbota NR, the larger reserve and 209 in Yina NR. The lower species richness at Imbota is likely to have resulted human disturbance rather than from overall habitat heterogeneity. Cunninghamia (2007) 10(2): 215–224 Introduction 1030 m. The eastern boundary is marked by Burying Ground Creek, a minor tributary of the Commissioners Waters, Imbota Nature Reserve (30° 35’S, 151° 45’E) and Yina that eventually flows into the Gara River and the eastern Nature Reserve (30° 29’S, 151° 45E’) lie 10 km to the fall of the Divide. -
View PDF for This Newsletter
NewsletterNewsletter No.128No.136 September September 2006 2008 Price:Price: $5.00 $5.00 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 136 (September 2008) AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Marco Duretto Peter Weston Tasmanian Herbarium National Herbarium of New South Wales, Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallery Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Private Bag 4 Mrs Macquaries Road Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Sydney, NSW 2000 Tel: (03) 6226 1806 Tel.: (02) 9231 8111 Fax: (03) 6226 7865 Fax: (02) 9251 7231 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Kirsten Cowley Michael Bayly Australian National Herbarium School of Botany GPO Box 1600 The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010 Canberra, ACT 2601 Tel: (03) 8344 7150 Tel: (02) 6246 5024 Fax: (03) 9347 5460 Fax: (02) 6246 5249 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Councillor Councillor Dale Dixon Tanya Scharaschkin Northern Territory Herbarium School of Natural Resource Sciences Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Queensland University of Technology Territory PO Box 2434 P.O. Box 496 Brisbane, Qld 4001 Palmerston, NT 0831 Tel: (07) 3138 1395 Tel: 08 89994512 Fax: (07) 3138 1535 Fax: 08 89994527 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Other Constitutional Bodies Public Officer Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Kirsten Cowley Barbara Briggs Australian National Herbarium Rod Henderson (Contact details above) Betsy Jackes Kristina Lemson -
Vegetation Inventory Report: 'Riverside / Rock Correa' Properties
Vegetation Inventory Report: ‘Riverside / Rock Correa’ properties Melbourne Strategic Assessment © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-1-76105-333-7 (online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au. Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... -
Species List
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Supporting Information Supporting Information Corrected December 28, 2015 Estep Et Al
Supporting Information Supporting Information Corrected December 28, 2015 Estep et al. 10.1073/pnas.1404177111 SI Materials and Methods inferred to represent a single locus and were combined into Taxon Sampling. We sampled 114 accessions representing two a majority-rule consensus sequence. Clones that did not meet outgroup species (Paspalum malacophyllum and Plagiantha tenella), these criteria were kept separate through another round of two species of Arundinella, and 100 species of Andropogoneae in RAxML analyses. We identified clades with a bootstrap value ≥ 40 genera. Plant material came from our own collections, the US 50 that comprised the same accession for each locus. Accessions Department of Agriculture (USDA) Germplasm Resources In- in these clades were reduced to a single majority-rule consensus formation Network (GRIN), the Kew Millenium Seed Bank, and sequence using the perl script clone_reducer (github.com/ material sent by colleagues. All plants acquired as seeds (e.g., those mrmckain). from USDA and from Kew) were grown to flowering in the Gene trees were estimated using RAxML v.7.3.0 with the greenhouse at the University of Missouri-St. Louis to verify iden- GTR + Γ model and 500 bootstrap replicates for each locus. tification. Vouchers are listed in Table S1. We used individual gene-tree topologies as a guide to identify and concatenate paralogues from the same genome for each acces- Sequencing and Processing. Total genomic DNA was extracted sion. If a polyploid had two paralogues in each gene tree, and one using a modified cetyl triethylammonium bromide (CTAB) paralogue was always sister to a particular diploid or other poly- procedure (1) or Qiagen DNeasy kits, following the manu- ploid, then we inferred that those paralogues represented the facturer’s protocol (Qiagen) (2). -
Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern Native Grass Symposium______
1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH EASTERN NATIVE GRASS SYMPOSIUM HELD IN HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA OCTOBER 10 -13, 2006 EDITOR MATT SANDERSON ASSOCIATE EDITORS PAUL ADLER SARAH GOSLEE JERRY RITCHIE HOWARD SKINNER KATHY SODER EDITORIAL ASSISTANT ALLISON KAY MOWERY HOSTED BY USDA, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE USDA, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS PUBLISHED BY OMNIPRESS MADISON, WISCONSIN This publication should be cited as: Author(s).2006.Title of paper.(inclusive pages). In M. A. Sanderson et al (eds.). Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern Native Grass Sympsoium, Harrisburg, PA, October 10 -13, 2006. 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH EASTERN NATIVE GRASS SYMPOSIUM_________________ SYMPOSIUM SPONSORS GENERAL ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS PARTNERS FOR FISH AND WILDIFE ROUNDSTONE NATIVE SEED, LLC OTHER AMERICAN GRASS SEED PRODUCERS KASTE SEED, INC. PENNSYLVANIA FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL TIMM ENTERPRISES TRUAX COMPANY, INC. USDA, AGRICUTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE PASTURE SYSTEMS & WATERSHED MANAGEMENT RESEARCH UNIT USDI, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE EXHIBITORS AGRECOL CORPORATION AG-RENEWAL, INC. BASF ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS A. T. FERRELL COMPANY, INC. FINGER LAKES CONSERVATION SERVICES J. F. NEW MARYLAND GRAZING LANDS CONSERVATION INITIATIVE NEW ENGLAND WETLAND PLANTS, INC. PRAIRIE HABITATS, INC. ROUNDSTONE NATIVE SEED, LLC SHARP BROTHERS SEED COMPANY OF MISSOURI TRUAX COMPANY, INC. USDA, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE PASTURE SYSTEMS & WATERSHED MANAGEMENT RESEARCH UNIT USDA, FARM SERVICES AGENCY USDA, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE PLANT MATERIALS PROGRAM USDA, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE PENNSYLVANIA ii 3 ____________________PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH EASTERN NATIVE GRASS SYMPOSIUM Introduction In February 1997 a one-day conference on native grasses in the Eastern United States was held at the Botanical Gardens in Asheville, North Carolina. -
Creating a Wildlife Corridor on the Mary River, Tiaro
CreatingCreating aa WildlifeWildlife CorridorCorridor onon thethe MaryMary River,River, TiaroTiaro Table of Contents THE CREATION OF A WILDLIFE CORRIDOR ON TIARO’S RIPARIAN ZONE Chapter 1: A Great Idea: The Mary River Koala Corridor Project 4 Chapter 2: A History of the River and the Tiaro Area 7 Chapter 3: The Landholders 11 Chapter 4: The Greater Mary Association (GMA) 19 Chapter 5: The Flora of the Wildlife Corridor 20 Chapter 6: The Fauna of the Wildlife Corridor 34 Chapter 7: Weeds and Feral Animals in the Wildlife Corridor 45 Chapter 8: Love Mary Day 12 May 2013 47 Chapter 9: So Life Goes on… 50 We wish our landholders every success in sustaining this worthwhile venture. Koala on site of the Love Mary Day activities, 11Dec12 1 For support and assistance with Love Mary Day, we gratefully acknowledge the following: Burnett Mary Regional Group, Rotary Club of Maryborough Sunrise, Maryborough Regional Arts Council, Mary River Catchment Coordinating Committee, Fraser Coast Regional Council (esp. Tina Raveneau and Juliette Musgrave), Natalie Richardson (animal rescue), Maryborough Birdwatchers (esp. Ruby Rosenfield, Coryn Dennet, and Bill Price), Peter McAdam, Greg Smyrell, Tiaro Lions Club, Tiaro CWA, Auntie Marie Wilkinson (Welcome to Country), Ian McKay (CCC weaving), Erica Neate (Lino prints), Australian Macada- mia Society, Glendyne School (manufacture of mini-creature homes), Marilyn Connell and other Tiaro Landcare members, Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland (wonderful children’s activities), Wide Bay Burnett Environment Council, Gympie Land for Wildlife, Lower Mary Landcare, Ann Bowden, Monika Bayer, Australian Koala Foundation, Darryl Stewart (Master of Ceremonies), Martin Fingland (the Gecko Man), Col Bowman (Richmond Birdwing Butterfly), John Parsons (Bat champion), Gympie Landcare, Emma -Kate Currie (musical entertainment). -
Erica Porter Bachelor of Science
THE ROOTS OF INVASION: BELOWGROUND TRAITS OF INVASIVE AND NATIVE AUSTRALIAN GRASSES Erica Porter Bachelor of Science Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Earth, Environmental, and Biological Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering Queensland University of Technology 2019 Keywords Ammonium, African lovegrass, Australian grasslands, belowground traits, buffel grass, Cenchrus ciliaris, Cenchrus purpurascens, Chloris gayana, Chloris truncata, Eragrostis curvula, Eragrostis sororia, functional traits, germination, grassland ecology, invasion ecology, invasion paradox, Johnson grass, leaf economic spectrum, low-resource environments, microdialysis, nitrate, nitrogen fluxes, nitrogen uptake efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency, resource economic spectrum, Rhodes grass, root economic spectrum, root traits, Sorghum halepense, Sorghum leiocladum, swamp foxtail, theory of invasibility, wild sorghum, windmill grass, woodlands lovegrass The Roots of Invasion: Belowground traits of invasive and native Australian grasses i Abstract Non-native grasses, originally introduced for pasture improvement, threaten Australia’s important and unique grasslands. Much of Australia’s grasslands are characterised by low resources and are an unlikely home for non-native grasses that have not evolved within these ecosystems. The mechanisms explaining this invasion remain equivocal. Ecologists use functional traits to classify species along a spectrum of resource conservation specialists and resource acquisition -
Of Bothriochloa, Capillipedium and Dichanthium (Poaceae)
Fungal Diversity The smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes) of Bothriochloa, Capillipedium and Dichanthium (Poaceae) Kálmán Vánky* Herbarium Ustilaginales Vánky (HUV), Gabriel-Biel-Str. 5, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany Vánky, K. (2004). The smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes) of Bothriochloa, Capillipedium and Dichanthium (Poaceae). Fungal Diversity 15: 221-246. Two NEW SPECIES proposed are: Sporisorium dichanthii Vánky & N.D. Sharma (type on Dichanthium aristatum, India), and S. rubyanum Vánky & N.D. Sharma (type on Capillipedium assimile, India). Eight NEW COMBINATIONS are: Macalpinomyces bothriochloae (L. Ling) Vánky (based on Ustilago bothriochloae, type on Bothriochloa pertusa, China); Sporisorium bothriochloae (L. Ling) Vánky (based on Sorosporium bothriochloae, type on Bothriochloa glabra, Malawi); Sporisorium dichanthicola (Mundkur & Thirum.) Vánky (based on Sphacelotheca dichanthicola, type on Dichanthium caricosum, India); Sporisorium dinteri (H. & P. Sydow) Vánky (based on Ustilago dinteri, type Andropogon papillosus, Namibia); Sporisorium reticulatum (B. Liu, Z.Y. Li & Du) Vánky (based on Sphacelotheca reticulata, type Bothriochloa ischaemum, China); Sporisorium sahayai (Mundkur) Vánky (based on Sphacelotheca sahayai, type on Dichanthium annulatum, India); Sporisorium superfluum (H. & P. Sydow) Vánky (based on Ustilago superflua, type Andropogon foveolatus, India), and Sporisorium tenue (H. & P. Sydow) Vánky (based on Ustilago tenuis, type Andropogon pertusus, India). The following thirteen names are considered to be SYNONYMS: Sphacelotheca chloridis Mundkur (type on Bothriochloa pertusa, India), Ustilago bothriochloae-intermediae Padwick (type on Bothriochloa intermedia, India) and Sorosporium baluchistani Ahmad (type on Bothriochloa sp., Pakistan) are Sporisorium andropogonis (Opiz) Vánky (type on Dichanthium ischaemum, Czech Rep.); Schroeteria annulata Ellis & Everh., Ustilago duthiei Ricker, Ustilago amphilophidis Zundel, and Ustilago sabourieana Mishra (all on Dichanthium annulatum from India) represent Sporisorium andropogonis-annulati (Bref.) S.R. -
4 Pastures on New England Wool Properties
Land, Water & Wool Northern Tablelands Project Fact Sheet Pastures on New England wool properties 4 A technical guide Introduction Pasture types Pastures are the engine room of every Seven main pasture types were grazing property. As part of the Land, identified by classification analysis: six Water & Wool (LWW) Northern native pasture types and pastures Tablelands Project (NSW), pasture dominated by sown species. composition was assessed in relation to land management and environmental 1. Redgrass - Parramatta factors on Monitor farms. grass - paddock lovegrass This Fact Sheet reports on the diversity Native and naturalised pastures of pasture types and pasture species on dominated by redgrass, Parramatta southern New England wool properties, grass and native lovegrasses were the Above—A redgrass-Parramatta grass and the relationships with soil type, most widespread pasture type and were naturalised pasture, with cocksfoot. grazing, fertiliser and cultivation. found on all soil types (Table 1). Minor species included hairy panic, phalaris, red lovegrass, poa tussock, Pasture diversity wallaby grass and windmill grass, as well as crab grass, couch, flatweed and on Monitor farms wiregrass (Aristida personata). Native species contributed 74% to pasture At least 219 plant ‘taxa’ (species and cover, on average. subspecies) in 52 families were All pastures of this type had been recorded in pasture surveys. The most cleared in the past, almost all had been diverse families were the grasses fertilised and were commercially (Poaceae, 26% of taxa), daisies grazed, and almost half the sites had (Asteraceae, 13%), legumes (Fabaceae, reverted to native dominance after Above—A tussock poa pasture. Photo— Michael Taylor. 9%), eucalypts and allies (Myrtaceae, cultivation or a sown pasture phase 5%), wild carrot and pennywort (Table 2). -
Observations on Grasses in the Auckland Region
Observations on Grasses in the Auckland Region M. D. Wilcox Introduction Browns Island Motutapu Rakino Motuihe and Grasses (Gramineae or Poaceae) feature prominently Waiheke — owes much of its character to grass in the man made or modified vegetation of the covered slopes which are green for much of the year Auckland region particularly in farm pastures but brown in long dry summers when the grass dries roadside verges playing fields racecourses golf off. courses and lawns. They are well adapted to grazing and mowing because new growth continually takes Grasses rarely seem to have been locally or regionally place below the leaf blades from the protected surveyed in New Zealand. This paper records and sheath enclosed growing points at the base of the discusses the indigenous adventive and cultivated plant. Many grasses also occur as weeds of grass species occurring in the region defined here as wasteland cultivated soils and disturbed sites as the territory administered under the Auckland components of maritime vegetation and a few species Regional Council (see Fig. 1) comprising the cities of are prominent in forest and forest fringes. The Auckland (including most of the Gulf islands) Auckland city hillscape — exemplified by the volcanic Manukau Waitakere and North Shore the whole of cones of North Head Mt Eden Mt Hobson Mt St the districts of Rodney (including Kawau Island) and John Mt Roskill Mt Albert One Tree Hill Mt Albert Papakura and the northern half of Franklin district. Mt Wellington and Mangere Mountain — and many of Altogether there are some 203 grasses recorded from the inner islands of the Hauraki Gulf — especially the region.