DOCSLIB.ORG

Beaufort Seas Coastal and Ocean Zones Strategic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beaufort Seas Coastal and Ocean Zones Strategic 166° 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140° 138° LEGEND North Slope Planning Area Conservation System Unit (Offset for display) Barrow B Trans-Alaska Pipeline ea !. eau hi S fort kc Se 1 Chuc a Subsistence Resource Use (Top Frame) Caribou C h i Wainwright er p Non Salmon Fish Species !. Riv p 70° e R Mead r i Topagoruk River e v v e i r R k u Teshekpuk Lake p Moose ik p !. k Atqasuk I Kaktovik !. Seals and Sea Lions 70° !. Nuiqsut !. Prudhoe Bay 1 r Subsistence Resource Use (Bottom Frame) e iv R k u Brown Bear r a p Point Lay !. Sagavanirktok River u K r e Birds and Eggs v i R g n i n n a C Whales NOTES er iv 1(Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas Coastal and Ocean Zones Strategic e R ll A lvi Assessment: Data Atlas, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Co n a November 1988) k It t k u il v l ik u k R R i v i e v r e r 68° er iv R r le d n a h Arctic Village C !. 68° 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140° 166° 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140° 138° Barrow .! Be Sea au DISCLAIMER hi for This atlas is a graphical representation of digital data from multiple sources. Not ckc t Sea all features indicated on this map have been constructed or physically located. Chu This atlas is a reference document only and is not intended to be used for navigation. The State of Alaska Makes no expressed or implied warranties with respect to the character, function, accuracy, or capabilities of this product or its appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages C h suffered by the user or any other person or entity from use of this atlas. i Wainwright er p .! Riv p 70° e R Mead r i Topagoruk River e v iv e LOCATION r R k u Teshekpuk Lake p ik p .! k Atqasuk I Kaktovik .! 70° !. Nuiqsut .! Prudhoe Bay r e iv R Canada k u Alaska r a p Point Lay .! Sagavanirktok River u K r e v i R g n i n n a C Map Projection: NAD 1983 Alaska Albers Map Scale: 1:1,500,000 er iv e R ll A lvi Co n a $ 0 10 20 40 60 80 100 k It t k u il Miles v l ik u k R R i v i e v r e r Alaska Department of Natural Resources North Slope Planning Area 68° SUBSISTENCE USE er iv R r le d n a h Arctic Village C .! May 2014 68° Page 3.0 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140° 166° 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140° 138° LEGEND North Slope Planning Area Conservation System Unit (Offset for display) Barrow B Trans-Alaska Pipeline ea !. eau hi S fort kc Se 1 Chuc a Subsistence Resource Use (Top Frame) Polar Bear C h i Wainwright er p Vegetation and Wood !. Riv p 70° e R Mead r i Topagoruk River e v v e i r R k u Teshekpuk Lake p Sheep ik p !. k Atqasuk I Kaktovik !. Subsistence Resource Use (Bottom Frame)1 70° !. Nuiqsut !. Prudhoe Bay Invertebrates r e iv R k u r Walrus a p Point Lay !. Sagavanirktok River u K r e v Furbearers and Small Game i R g n i n n a C NOTES er iv 1(Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas Coastal and Ocean Zones Strategic e R ll A lvi Assessment: Data Atlas, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Co n a November 1988) k It t k u il v l ik u k R R i v i e v r e r 68° er iv R r le d n a h Arctic Village C !. 68° 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140° 166° 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140° 138° Barrow !. Be Sea au DISCLAIMER hi for This atlas is a graphical representation of digital data from multiple sources. Not ckc t Sea all features indicated on this map have been constructed or physically located. Chu This atlas is a reference document only and is not intended to be used for navigation. The State of Alaska Makes no expressed or implied warranties with respect to the character, function, accuracy, or capabilities of this product or its appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages C h suffered by the user or any other person or entity from use of this atlas. i Wainwright er p !. Riv p 70° e R Mead r i Topagoruk River e v iv e LOCATION r R k u Teshekpuk Lake p ik p !. k Atqasuk I Kaktovik !. 70° !. Nuiqsut !. Prudhoe Bay r e iv R Canada k u Alaska r a p Point Lay !. Sagavanirktok River u K r e v i R g n i n n a C Map Projection: NAD 1983 Alaska Albers Map Scale: 1:1,500,000 er iv e R ll A lvi Co n a $ 0 10 20 40 60 80 100 k It t k u il Miles v l ik u k R R i v i e v r e r Alaska Department of Natural Resources North Slope Planning Area 68° SUBSISTENCE USE er iv R r le d n a h Arctic Village C !. May 2014 68° Page 3.1 164° 162° 160° 158° 156° 154° 152° 150° 148° 146° 144° 142° 140°.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beaufort Sea Monitoring Program
    Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Beaufort Sea Monitoring Program: Proceedings of a Workshop and Sampling Design Recommendations Beaufort Sea Monitoring Program: Proceedings of a Workshop (September 1983) and Sampling Design Recommendations ; Prepared for the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Juneau, Alaska by J. P. Houghton Dames & Moore 155 N.E. lOOth Street Seattle, WA 98125 with D. A Segar J. E. Zeh SEAM Ocean Inc. Department of Statistics Po. Box 1627 University of Washington Wheaton, MD 20902 Seattle, WA 98195 April 1984 UNITED STATES UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Malcolm Baldridge, Secretary William P Clark, Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC AND MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION William D. Bettenberg, Director John V. Byrne, Administrator r. NOTICES i? I This report has been reviewed by the US. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program office, and approved for publication. The interpretation of data and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and workshop participants. Approval does not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of the Department of Commerce or those of the Department of the Interior. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this publica­ tion. No reference shall be made to NOAA or to this publication in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that NOAA approves, recommends, or endorses any proprietary'product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchas'ed because of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Declines in Warming and Vegetation Greening Trends Over Pan-Arctic Tundra
    Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 4229-4254; doi:10.3390/rs5094229 OPEN ACCESS Remote Sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article Recent Declines in Warming and Vegetation Greening Trends over Pan-Arctic Tundra Uma S. Bhatt 1,*, Donald A. Walker 2, Martha K. Raynolds 2, Peter A. Bieniek 1,3, Howard E. Epstein 4, Josefino C. Comiso 5, Jorge E. Pinzon 6, Compton J. Tucker 6 and Igor V. Polyakov 3 1 Geophysical Institute, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Dr., Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Arctic Biology, Department of Biology and Wildlife, College of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, P.O. Box 757000, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.A.W.); [email protected] (M.K.R.) 3 International Arctic Research Center, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of Natural Science and Mathematics, 930 Koyukuk Dr., Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Cryospheric Sciences Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 614.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 6 Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 614.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.E.P.); [email protected] (C.J.T.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-907-474-2662; Fax: +1-907-474-2473.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Resources
    Archaeology Resources Page Intentionally Left Blank Archaeological Resources Background Archaeological Resources are defined as “any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object [including shipwrecks]…Such term includes artifacts, records, and remains which are related to such a district, site, building, structure, or object” (National Historic Preservation Act, Sec. 301 (5) as amended, 16 USC 470w(5)). Archaeological resources are either historic or prehistoric and generally include properties that are 50 years old or older and are any of the following: • Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history • Associated with the lives of persons significant in the past • Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction • Represent the work of a master • Possess high artistic values • Present a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction • Have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history These resources represent the material culture of past generations of a region’s prehistoric and historic inhabitants, and are basic to our understanding of the knowledge, beliefs, art, customs, property systems, and other aspects of the nonmaterial culture. Further, they are subject to National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) review if they are historic properties, meaning those that are on, or eligible for placement on, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). These sites are referred to as historic properties. Section 106 requires agencies to make a reasonable and good faith efforts to identify historic properties. Archaeological resources may be found in the Proposed Project Area both offshore and onshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaufort Sea
    160°W 159°W 158°W 157°W 156°W 155°W 154°W 153°W 152°W 151°W 150°W 149°W 148°W 147°W 146°W 145°W 144°W 143°W 142°W 141°W 140°W Beaufort Sea !Barrow N ° N 1 ° 14 7 1 7 15 13 12 !Wainwright 16 11 Prudhoe 17 Bay 10 Camden N 9 ° N Bay Kaktovik 0 ° 8 7 !Kaktovik Nuiqsut 7 0 ! 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 N ational P e C troleum Reserv e - Alaska a U n a . S d . a N - ° N - 9 ° A 6 9 s s Y 6 n e d e r l W i l a u s k k o a Index Map 1 of 3 n U.S./Canada Border to Wainwright ife Refuge Final Designation ic National Wildl of Critical Barrier Islands and Arct Denning Habitat Maps N ° N 8 ° 6 8 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 miles 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 km Map N ° N 7 ° Area 6 7 Pacific Ocean 6 158°W 157°W 156°W 155°W 154°W 153°W 152°W 151°W 150°W 149°W 148°W 147°W 146°W 145°W 144°W 143°W 142°W 99-0136 142°20'W 142°10'W 142°W 141°50'W 141°40'W 141°30'W 141°20'W 141°10'W 141°W Beaufort Sea N N ' ' 0 0 5 5 ° ° 9 9 6 6 r e v i R k a sr ak Eg N N ' ' 0 0 4 r Demarcation 4 ° ° 9 e 9 6 v 6 i Bay R t u k a g n o K N N ' ' 0 0 3 3 ° ° 9 9 6 6 C U a n .
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Variability of the Arctic Ocean Sea Ice During the Present Interglacial
    Natural variability of the Arctic Ocean sea ice during the present interglacial Anne de Vernala,1, Claude Hillaire-Marcela, Cynthia Le Duca, Philippe Robergea, Camille Bricea, Jens Matthiessenb, Robert F. Spielhagenc, and Ruediger Steinb,d aGeotop-Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada; bGeosciences/Marine Geology, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany; cOcean Circulation and Climate Dynamics Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, 24148 Kiel, Germany; and dMARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences and Faculty of Geosciences, University of Bremen, 28334 Bremen, Germany Edited by Thomas M. Cronin, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Jean Jouzel August 26, 2020 (received for review May 6, 2020) The impact of the ongoing anthropogenic warming on the Arctic such an extrapolation. Moreover, the past 1,400 y only encom- Ocean sea ice is ascertained and closely monitored. However, its pass a small fraction of the climate variations that occurred long-term fate remains an open question as its natural variability during the Cenozoic (7, 8), even during the present interglacial, on centennial to millennial timescales is not well documented. i.e., the Holocene (9), which began ∼11,700 y ago. To assess Here, we use marine sedimentary records to reconstruct Arctic Arctic sea-ice instabilities further back in time, the analyses of sea-ice fluctuations. Cores collected along the Lomonosov Ridge sedimentary archives is required but represents a challenge (10, that extends across the Arctic Ocean from northern Greenland to 11). Suitable sedimentary sequences with a reliable chronology the Laptev Sea were radiocarbon dated and analyzed for their and biogenic content allowing oceanographical reconstructions micropaleontological and palynological contents, both bearing in- can be recovered from Arctic Ocean shelves, but they rarely formation on the past sea-ice cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Beaufort Sea 2000: the Environmental and Social Setting G
    ARCTIC VOL. 55, SUPP. 1 (2002) P. 4–17 Canadian Beaufort Sea 2000: The Environmental and Social Setting G. BURTON AYLES1 and NORMAN B. SNOW2 (Received 1 March 2001; accepted in revised form 2 January 2002) ABSTRACT. The Beaufort Sea Conference 2000 brought together a diverse group of scientists and residents of the Canadian Beaufort Sea region to review the current state of the region’s renewable resources and to discuss the future management of those resources. In this paper, we briefly describe the physical environment, the social context, and the resource management processes of the Canadian Beaufort Sea region. The Canadian Beaufort Sea land area extends from the Alaska-Canada border east to Amundsen Gulf and includes the northwest of Victoria Island and Banks Island. The area is defined by its geology, landforms, sources of freshwater, ice and snow cover, and climate. The social context of the Canadian Beaufort Sea region has been set by prehistoric Inuit and Gwich’in, European influence, more recent land-claim agreements, and current management regimes for the renewable resources of the Beaufort Sea. Key words: Beaufort Sea, Inuvialuit, geography, environment, ethnography, communities RÉSUMÉ. La Conférence de l’an 2000 sur la mer de Beaufort a attiré un groupe hétérogène de scientifiques et de résidents de la région de la mer de Beaufort en vue d’examiner le statut actuel des ressources renouvelables de cette zone et de discuter de leur gestion future. Dans cet article, on décrit brièvement l’environnement physique, le contexte social et les processus de gestion des ressources de la zone canadienne de la mer de Beaufort.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Report Card 2018 Effects of Persistent Arctic Warming Continue to Mount
    Arctic Report Card 2018 Effects of persistent Arctic warming continue to mount 2018 Headlines 2018 Headlines Video Executive Summary Effects of persistent Arctic warming continue Contacts to mount Vital Signs Surface Air Temperature Continued warming of the Arctic atmosphere Terrestrial Snow Cover and ocean are driving broad change in the Greenland Ice Sheet environmental system in predicted and, also, Sea Ice unexpected ways. New emerging threats Sea Surface Temperature are taking form and highlighting the level of Arctic Ocean Primary uncertainty in the breadth of environmental Productivity change that is to come. Tundra Greenness Other Indicators River Discharge Highlights Lake Ice • Surface air temperatures in the Arctic continued to warm at twice the rate relative to the rest of the globe. Arc- Migratory Tundra Caribou tic air temperatures for the past five years (2014-18) have exceeded all previous records since 1900. and Wild Reindeer • In the terrestrial system, atmospheric warming continued to drive broad, long-term trends in declining Frostbites terrestrial snow cover, melting of theGreenland Ice Sheet and lake ice, increasing summertime Arcticriver discharge, and the expansion and greening of Arctic tundravegetation . Clarity and Clouds • Despite increase of vegetation available for grazing, herd populations of caribou and wild reindeer across the Harmful Algal Blooms in the Arctic tundra have declined by nearly 50% over the last two decades. Arctic • In 2018 Arcticsea ice remained younger, thinner, and covered less area than in the past. The 12 lowest extents in Microplastics in the Marine the satellite record have occurred in the last 12 years. Realms of the Arctic • Pan-Arctic observations suggest a long-term decline in coastal landfast sea ice since measurements began in the Landfast Sea Ice in a 1970s, affecting this important platform for hunting, traveling, and coastal protection for local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance of Select Trace Metals in Chukchi and Beaufort Sea Ice
    Distribution and Abundance of Select Trace Metals in Chukchi and Beaufort Sea Ice Principal Investigators Robert Rember1 Ana M. Aguilar-Islas2 Graduate Student Vincent Domena2 1International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks 2College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks FINAL REPORT December 2016 OCS Study BOEM 2016-079 Contact Information: email: [email protected] phone: 907.474.6782 fax: 907.474.7204 Coastal Marine Institute College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks P. O. Box 757220 Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220 This study was funded in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) through Cooperative Agreement M13AC00002 between BOEM, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region, and the University of Alaska Fairbanks. This report, OCS Study BOEM 2016-079, is available through the Coastal Marine Institute, select federal depository libraries and can be accessed electronically at http://www.boem.gov/Alaska-Scientific-Publications. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Snow, Ice and Permafrost Across Canada
    CHAPTER 5 Changes in Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Across Canada CANADA’S CHANGING CLIMATE REPORT CANADA’S CHANGING CLIMATE REPORT 195 Authors Chris Derksen, Environment and Climate Change Canada David Burgess, Natural Resources Canada Claude Duguay, University of Waterloo Stephen Howell, Environment and Climate Change Canada Lawrence Mudryk, Environment and Climate Change Canada Sharon Smith, Natural Resources Canada Chad Thackeray, University of California at Los Angeles Megan Kirchmeier-Young, Environment and Climate Change Canada Acknowledgements Recommended citation: Derksen, C., Burgess, D., Duguay, C., Howell, S., Mudryk, L., Smith, S., Thackeray, C. and Kirchmeier-Young, M. (2019): Changes in snow, ice, and permafrost across Canada; Chapter 5 in Can- ada’s Changing Climate Report, (ed.) E. Bush and D.S. Lemmen; Govern- ment of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, p.194–260. CANADA’S CHANGING CLIMATE REPORT 196 Chapter Table Of Contents DEFINITIONS CHAPTER KEY MESSAGES (BY SECTION) SUMMARY 5.1: Introduction 5.2: Snow cover 5.2.1: Observed changes in snow cover 5.2.2: Projected changes in snow cover 5.3: Sea ice 5.3.1: Observed changes in sea ice Box 5.1: The influence of human-induced climate change on extreme low Arctic sea ice extent in 2012 5.3.2: Projected changes in sea ice FAQ 5.1: Where will the last sea ice area be in the Arctic? 5.4: Glaciers and ice caps 5.4.1: Observed changes in glaciers and ice caps 5.4.2: Projected changes in glaciers and ice caps 5.5: Lake and river ice 5.5.1: Observed changes in lake and river ice 5.5.2: Projected changes in lake and river ice 5.6: Permafrost 5.6.1: Observed changes in permafrost 5.6.2: Projected changes in permafrost 5.7: Discussion This chapter presents evidence that snow, ice, and permafrost are changing across Canada because of increasing temperatures and changes in precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanography of the Canadian Shelf of the Beaufort Sea: a Setting for Marine Life EDDY C
    ARCTIC VOL. 55, SUPP. 1 (2002) P. 29–45 Oceanography of the Canadian Shelf of the Beaufort Sea: A Setting for Marine Life EDDY C. CARMACK1,2 and ROBIE W. MACDONALD1 (Received 1 March 2001; accepted in revised form 28 August 2001) ABSTRACT. Conservation of marine biodiversity in the Beaufort Sea demands that we understand what individual organisms require of their physical and geochemical environments in order to survive. Specifically, how do the extraordinary spatial and seasonal variations in ice cover, temperature, light, freshwater, turbidity, and currents of the Beaufort Sea define unique places or times critical to marine life? We start with the traditional “bottom-up” approach, which is to review the strongly seasonal physical forcing of the system, and from it to infer the resultant oceanographic regimes and seasons. This approach, while valuable, remains incomplete: this is due partly to limitations of the data and partly to our limited understanding of this complex system. The oceanographic features (e.g., upwelling regions, recurrent polynyas, coastal currents, sediment types and distributions) define the backdrop that animals “know and understand” in the sense of interacting with one another and finding food and habitat. We therefore seek clues to the underlying oceanographic processes in the behavioural patterns of fish, marine mammals, and birds. This “top-down” approach also has limitations, but it offers the opportunity to seek those connections in the system where climate change is likely to have its greatest impact on biological populations. Key words: Beaufort Sea, global warming, upwelling, sea ice, nutrients, sediments RÉSUMÉ. La conservation de la biodiversité marine dans la mer de Beaufort passe par notre compréhension des éléments nécessaires à la survie des organismes individuels au sein de leur environnement physique et géochimique.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Overview and Assessment Report Canadian Technical Report
    Beaufort Sea Large Ocean Management Area: Ecosystem Overview and Assessment Report D. Cobb, H. Fast, M.H. Papst, D. Rosenberg, R. Rutherford, and J.E. Sareault Central and Arctic Region Freshwater Institute 501 University Crescent Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 2008 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2780 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts . Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925. Rapport technique canadien des Sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la publication dans un journal scientifique.
    [Show full text]
  • Safeguarding Important Areas in the U.S. Arctic Ocean
    A brief from Aug 2015 Getty Images Milo Burcham Safeguarding Important Areas in the U.S. Arctic Ocean Overview The U.S. Arctic Ocean supports unique species found nowhere else in the country and is home to indigenous Inupiat people who have thrived on its bounty for thousands of years. The Pew Charitable Trusts believes that a balance must be struck between responsible economic development and preservation of ecosystem integrity and function in the Arctic Ocean. Safeguarding especially important areas can help the rapidly changing Arctic environment remain healthy, while providing local communities and the businesses that have invested there with more certainty about the future management of the region. Marine life is abundant throughout the Beaufort and Chukchi seas. But recent syntheses of the best available science support the idea that certain areas, often those with distinct physical or oceanographic features, make exceptional contributions to ecosystem function and subsistence.1 These sites have characteristics that make them important migration routes; provide vital habitat for marine mammal breeding, spawning, or foraging; and offer ideal conditions for the microscopic organisms that form the foundation of the marine food web. They are also crucial to the long-term health of the wildlife that sustain subsistence activities and to the spiritual, nutritional, and cultural well-being of the region’s communities. In January 2015, President Barack Obama permanently withdrew 9.8 million acres of Arctic marine waters from oil and gas leasing under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.2 The five areas set aside include: a coastal corridor in the Chukchi Sea, two whaling areas adjacent to the communities of Barrow and Kaktovik, the northwestern waters of Barrow Canyon, and a shallow shelf known as Hanna Shoal.
    [Show full text]