DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring Valley Wind Energy Facility PDEA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring Valley Wind Energy Facility PDEA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment Revised Avian and Bat Protection Plan for Spring Valley Wind Energy Facility DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2017-0022-EA May 2018 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Ely District Office, Nevada i Environmental Assessment Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Identifying Information ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 Title, Environment Assessment Number and Type of Project ................. 1-3 1.2.2 Location of Proposed Action ................................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Name and Location of Preparing Office .................................................. 1-3 1.2.4 BLM Case File Number .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.5 Applicant Name ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Background Information ................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Decision to be Made ........................................................................................ 1-5 1.6 Conformance, Permits, and Approvals ............................................................. 1-5 1.6.1 Conformance with the BLM Ely District Resource Management Plan ..... 1-5 1.6.2 Relationship to Statues, Regulations or Other Plans ............................... 1-5 1.6.3 Permits and Approvals ............................................................................ 1-6 1.7 Scoping, Public Involvement, and Issues ......................................................... 1-6 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives ................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2-3 2.2 Description of the Proposed Action .................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 Mortality Metric Change .......................................................................... 2-4 2.2.2 Avian and Bat Mortality Thresholds ........................................................ 2-4 2.2.3 Targeted Curtailment Strategy ................................................................ 2-5 2.2.4 Mitigation Phases ................................................................................... 2-6 Phase I/Default .............................................................................................. 2-7 Phase II Mitigation ......................................................................................... 2-7 Phase III Mitigation ........................................................................................ 2-7 2.3 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................... 2-8 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Not Analyzed in Detail ......................................... 2-8 Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Effects ...................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2 General Setting .............................................................................................. 3-10 3.3 Special Status Species - Bats ........................................................................ 3-10 Baseline Data from 2010 FEA ..................................................................... 3-10 Bat Activity ............................................................................................ 3-10 Rose Guano Cave Use ......................................................................... 3-14 Post-Construction Surveys Results .............................................................. 3-14 Bat Activity ............................................................................................ 3-14 Rose Guano Cave Use ......................................................................... 3-15 3.4 Environmental Effects .................................................................................... 3-18 3.4.1 General Bat Fatality Patterns at Wind Farms ........................................ 3-19 3.4.2 Turbine Curtailment Studies ................................................................. 3-19 3.4.3 Modeling Predictions of High Fatality Nights ......................................... 3-20 3.4.4 Bat Fatalities at SVWEF and Effectiveness of the Targeted Curtailment Program ................................................................................................ 3-20 3.4.5 Alternative A – Proposed Action ........................................................... 3-22 Direct Effects ............................................................................................... 3-22 Thresholds ............................................................................................ 3-22 Targeted Curtailment Strategy .............................................................. 3-23 Table of Contents May 2018 Environmental Assessment ii Indirect Effects ............................................................................................. 3-23 3.4.6 Alternative B – No Action ...................................................................... 3-23 Direct Effects ............................................................................................... 3-23 Indirect Effects ............................................................................................. 3-24 Chapter 4 Cumulative Effects ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2 Special Status Species - Bats .......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.1 Alternative A – Proposed Action ............................................................. 4-3 4.2.2 Alternative B – No Action ........................................................................ 4-3 Chapter 5 Consultation and Coordination ..................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5-3 Chapter 6 List of Preparers ............................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 6-3 Chapter 7 References ..................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 References ...................................................................................................... 7-3 7.2 Laws, Acts, and Regulations ............................................................................ 7-6 May 2018 Table of Contents iii Environmental Assessment List of Tables Table 2-1. Original ABPP mitigation phases. ........................................................................... 2-3 Table 2-2. Summary of bat mitigation phases for exceedance of overall bat fatality thresholds as revised. .................................................................................................. 2-6 Table 3-1. Resources analysis determination. ......................................................................... 3-4 Table 3-2. Bat Species identified from acoustic surveys, 2007–2008. ................................... 3-10 Table 3-3. Peak bat activity detected during surveys............................................................. 3-15 Table 6-1. List of BLM Preparers ............................................................................................ 6-3 Table 6-2. List of WEST Preparers.......................................................................................... 6-3 List of Figures Figure 3-1. Nightly activity patterns of all bat species, 2007–2008. ....................................... 3-11 Figure 3-2. Nightly activity patterns of western small-footed myotis, long-eared myotis, little brown myotis, and Mexican free-tailed bat, 2007–2008. ..................................... 3-12 Figure 3-3. Seasonal activity patterns for all bat species, 2007–2008. .................................. 3-13 Figure 3-4. Seasonal patterns for migratory versus non-migratory bat species, 2007–2008. .................................................................................................................................. 3-13 Figure 3-5. Beam breaks per year May 1 through October 31. .............................................. 3-17 Figure 3-6. Annual beam break data at Rose Guano Cave, 2014-2017. ............................... 3-18 List of Appendices Appendix A Revised Spring Valley Avian and Bat Protection Plan Appendix B Proposed Revisions Table of Contents May 2018 Environmental Assessment iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations § Section 2005 PEIS 2005 Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix H Public Comments and Responses to DEIS
    APPENDIX H PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT According to NEPA, federal agencies are required to identify and formally respond to all substantive public comments. A standardized content analysis process was conducted to analyze the public comments on the Draft EIS. Each comment letter and email message received was read, analyzed and considered by BLM, Reclamation, and Western to ensure that all substantive comments were identified. In performing this analysis, the BLM, Reclamation, and Western relied on the Council on Environmental Quality’s regulations to determine what constituted a substantive comment. A substantive comment does one or more of the following: Questions, with a reasonable basis, the accuracy of the information and/or analysis in the EIS. Questions, with a reasonable basis, the adequacy of the information and/or analysis in the EIS. Presents reasonable alternatives other than those presented in the Draft EIS that meet the purpose and need of the proposed action and addresses significant issues. Questions, with a reasonable basis, the merits of an alternative or alternatives. Causes changes in or revisions to the proposed action. Questions, with a reasonable basis, the adequacy of the planning process itself. Thirty-seven individual comment letters and/or emails were submitted to the BLM during the 45-day comment period. Within the 37 comment letters, 322 comments were identified and addressed. Comments on the Draft EIS that failed to meet the above description were considered non-substantive because they expressed personal opinions or preferences that were not relevant to the adequacy or accuracy of the Draft EIS, or represented commentary regarding resource management unrelated to the Draft EIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Wide Plan
    nye County esmeralda County WhIte PIne County Area Wide Plan Inyo County lInColn County Coalition Assessment Grant funded through the US Environmental Protection Agency [This page intentionally left blank.] Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Coalition ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Description/Overview ................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 History ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Demographics ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Renewable Energy Factors ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2.1 Clean Energy Resources and Technologies .......................................................................... 9 1.2.2 Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Valley Wind Energy Facility
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-L020-2010-0007-EA October 2010 Spring Valley Wind Energy Facility Location: Spring Valley, White Pine County, Nevada Applicant/Address: Spring Valley Wind LLC 1600 Smith Street, Suite 4025 Houston, Texas 77002 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Schell Field Office Phone: (775) 289-1800 Fax: (775) 289-1910 This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment Spring Valley Wind CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION ................................................................................ 4 1.3 PRELIMINARY ISSUES ............................................................................................................. 5 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................... 7 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION .................................................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Wind Energy Facility Construction ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vineyard Wind Connector 2: Analysis to Support Petition Before the Energy Facilities Siting Board
    Vineyard Wind Connector 2: Analysis to Support Petition Before the Energy Facilities Siting Board Docket #EFSB 20-01 Volume I: Text May 28, 2020 Submitted to Prepared by Energy Facilities Siting Board Epsilon Associates, Inc. One South Station 3 Mill & Main Place, Suite 250 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Maynard, Massachusetts 01754 Submitted by In Association with Vineyard Wind LLC Foley Hoag LLP 700 Pleasant Street, Suite 510 Stantec, Inc. New Bedford, Massachusetts 02740 Gradient Geo SubSea LLC ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT PETITION BEFORE THE ENERGY FACILITIES SITING BOARD DOCKET #EFSB 20-01 Vineyard Wind Connector 2 VOLUME I: TEXT Submitted to: ENERGY FACILITIES SITING BOARD One South Station Boston, MA 02114 Submitted by: VINEYARD WIND LLC 700 Pleasant Street, Suite 510 New Bedford, MA 02740 Prepared by: EPSILON ASSOCIATES, INC. In Association with: 3 Mill & Main Place, Suite 250 Maynard, MA 01754 Foley Hoag LLP Stantec, Inc. Gradient Geo SubSea LLC May 28, 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents VOLUME I 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW AND DESCRIPTION 1-1 1.1 Introduction/Siting Board Jurisdiction 1-2 1.2 Offshore Wind, Background 1-4 1.2.1 Background on Offshore Wind Lease Areas 1-7 1.2.2 Connecticut Energy Legislation (An Act Concerning the Procurement of Energy Derived from Offshore Wind) 1-8 1.2.3 Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan 1-9 1.3 Project Overview 1-10 1.3.1 Offshore Wind Array (Federal Waters, for background) 1-10 1.3.2 Offshore Transmission Cables 1-12 1.3.3 Onshore Export Cables 1-14 1.3.4 Substation 1-16 1.3.4.1 Containment System 1-18
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Powers Silver State As a Clean Energy Industry Hub
    RENEWABLE ENERGY POWERS SILVER STATE AS A CLEAN ENERGY INDUSTRY HUB Lydia Ball, Executive Director Clean Energy Project March 2014 With a very special thanks to the Nevada Governor’s Office of Energy, the American Wind Energy Association, the Solar Energy Industries Association, and the Geothermal Energy Association, for their contributions to this white paper. Powering the clean energy economy. CLEAN ENERGY POWERS NEVADA Clean energy investment in Nevada has accelerated large-scale wind project, the Spring Valley Wind Farm, rapidly in the past five years and is now well over now generates enough energy for 45,000 homes and a $5 billion investment in Nevada, an economic suc- additional wind developments are currently underway.4 cess story that is symbolized this year by three major Due to Nevada’s vast solar, wind, geothermal and trade associations holding their annual events in the biomass resources, the state has excelled at meeting state. demand in and out of it’s borders leading to significant clean energy capital investments. As of 2014, Nevada The Renewable Energy Tax Abatement program has 480 MW5 of clean energy developed or being devel- administers Nevada’s renewable energy tax abatements, oped to meet its energy demand and 985 MW6 of clean extended by the Nevada Legislature in 2009 and trans- energy exported to other states.5 ferred to the Governor’s Energy Office’s jurisdiction in 2011. The program awards partial sales and use tax and The cumulative capital investments for projects sold partial property-tax abatements to eligible renewable to in-state and out-of-state customers, including trans- energy producers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada State Demographer's Office
    Nevada County Population Projections 2008 to 2028 August 2008 Prepared By: The Nevada State Demographer’s Office Jeff Hardcastle, AICP NV State Demographer Dilek Uz, Demographic Graduate Assistant University of NV Reno MS/032 Reno, NV 89557 (775) 784-6353 [email protected] [email protected] The NV State Demographers’s Office is part of the NV Small Business Development Center and Is funded by the NV Department of Taxation Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................... 1 Specific Factors Considered In The Projections Clark County (Las Vegas Valley) Hotel Rooms ......................... 5 Mining Employment............................................... 8 Housing......................................................... 9 Other Projects Reported By Local Governments...................... 11 Population Projections For Nevada’s Counties 2008 to 2028 .................. 12 Appendices Appendix A - Nevada Mining Outlook ...................................... 1 Appendix B - Nevada Housing Unit and Household Creation From 2000 to 2007 . 2 Appendix C - Projects Identified By Local Governments IN 2008 ............... 6 The following report contains projections for Nevada and its counties beginning in 2008 through 2028 (starting from the last estimate done in 2007). It is being produced during a period when the state is experiencing economic challenges from the housing bubble and increasing energy costs. These challenges come at a time when Nevada has been the fastest growing state in the country for 20
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Renewable Power System Controller
    DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA EEL 4915 Senior Design II Integrated Renewable Power System Controller Group 28 Karel Castex Julio Lara David Wade Jing Zou Sponsored by Progress Energy i Table of Content 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Project Description 2 2.1 Motivation and Goals 2 2.2 Objectives 3 2.2.1 Small-Scaled 3 2.2.2 Self-Sustained 3 2.2.3 Efficiency 3 2.2.4 Environmentally Friendly 3 2.2.5 Low Maintence and User Friendly 4 2.2.6 Input 1: Solar Power 4 2.2.7 Input 2: Wind Power 4 2.2.8 Control Box 5 2.2.9 Energy Storage 5 2.2.10 Output 5 2.3 Project Requirements and Specifications 5 3.0 Research 8 3.1 Related Projects 8 3.2 Solar Power 8 3.2.1 Advantages and Limitations 8 3.2.2 Solar Cells and Manufacturing Technology 9 3.2.2.1 Mono-Crystalline Silicon 10 3.2.2.2 Polycrystalline Silicon 11 3.2.2.3 Thin Film and Amorphous Silicon 11 3.2.2.4 Copper Indium Gallium (de)Selenide (CIGS) 12 3.3.2.5 Cadmium Telluride CdTe Thin Film Panel 12 3.2.2.6 Gallium Arsenide GaAs Thin Film Panel 13 3.2.3 Photovoltaic Effect in Solar Cells 13 3.2.4 Photovoltaic Panel Performance 14 3.2.5 Solar Radiation 15 3.3 Wind Power 17 3.3.1 Advantages and Limitations 17 3.3.2 Wind Power Mechanism 18 3.3.3 Wind power Performance 19 3.3.4 Capacity and production 19 3.3.5 Distribution of Wind Speed 22 3.4 Charge Controllers 22 3.4.1 Shunt Controller 24 3.4.2 Series Controller 24 3.4.3 Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) 26 ii 3.4.3.1 Perturb and Observe Method 27 3.4.3.2 Incremental Conductance Method 28 3.4.3.3 Constant
    [Show full text]
  • Use It Or Lose It
    MONDAY,APRIL 23, 2012 Volume 11 Issue 139 Santa Monica Daily Press THINK LIKE A BOX OFFICE WINNER SEE PAGE 3 We have you covered THE CREATIVE COMMUNICATION ISSUE Surviving 120 days of rest BY SAMANTHA MASUNAGA Special to the Daily Press MID-CITY On a late December day, Jessica Fisher was rushed to the Santa Monica- UCLA Medical Center in a panic. Her doctor had discovered cervical incompetency during a routine ultrasound, a find that could have endangered the lives of her twins, if left untreated. She was only 19 weeks pregnant. Fisher underwent a cerclage procedure to stitch up her prematurely opening cervix and was placed on bed rest for the remainder of her pregnancy. She delivered two healthy babies, Ella Madison and Ethan Tate, via Caesarian sec- tion surgery Saturday. But it is the 120 days in between that set her story apart. Over the course of four months, her bland hospital room was transformed into a den for all seasons. In one corner, gold metallic streamers spelled out “Happy New Year’s!” while red heart decorations marked Valentine’s Day. ALL IN Brandon Wise [email protected] Orchids in the windowsills and a large Men and women enter into the water during the annual Santa Monica Pier Paddleboard Race on Saturday morning. canvas portrait of her wedding day added a home-y taste. A rack of baby clothes — one side pink and the other blue — gave her hope to continue her time in the hospital, Fisher said. “It was such a shock to the system,” she said of the cervical discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada System of Higher Education 2012 Renewable Energy Report
    Nevada System of Higher Education 2012 Renewable Energy Report (BOARD OF REGENTS' AGENDA 11/29/12 & 11/30/12) Ref. BOR-8b, Page 1 of 92 UNLV (BOARD OF REGENTS' AGENDA 11/29/12 & 11/30/12) Ref. BOR-8b, Page 2 of 92 2012 Renewable Energy Report UNLV: A Leader in Renewable Energy Introduction The University of Nevada, Las Vegas is dedicated to advancing renewable energy in the community, state, region, and beyond. UNLV’s outstanding achievements in renewable energy research, its success in establishing public/private partnerships, and its outstanding academic programs place the university as a leader among the state’s public entities in this field. UNLV has acquired more than $101 million in funding in the past dozen years for research on wide-ranging subjects in the renewable energy area, including solar and geothermal power; biofuels; photonics; nuclear energy, including recycling of nuclear waste; and hydrogen production, storage, and use.* This year, UNLV is among 20 teams selected worldwide to participate in the 2013 Solar Decathlon, an international competition initiated by the U.S. Department of Energy with the goal of educating the public about energy-saving opportunities. Collegiate teams from across the U.S. and around the world design, build, and operate sustainable solar-powered houses. This competition serves as an avenue for academic institutions and their respective teams to showcase their expertise and promote sustainability and the environment. Additionally, UNLV has formed partnerships with a variety of businesses and other public entities with the goal of accelerating the deployment of renewable technologies, diversifying the regional economy, generating jobs, analyzing policy, and coordinating financial and intellectual resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Biological Assessment
    Biological Assessment Celanese Methanol Project 72388001.00 Biological Assessment Celanese Methanol Project Document Information Prepared for Celanese Ltd. Project Name Celanese Methanol Project Project Number 72388001.00 Project Manager Anne Allen Date February 2013 Prepared for: Celanese Ltd. 9502 Bayport Blvd. Pasadena, TX 77507-1498 Prepared by: Cardno ENTRIX 5252 Westchester, Suite 250, Houston, Texas 77005 Tel 713 666 6223 Fax 713 666 5227 Toll-free 800 368 7511 www.cardnoentrix.com February 2013 Cardno ENTRIX Document Information i Biological Assessment Celanese Methanol Project This Page Intentionally Left Blank ii Document Information Cardno ENTRIX February 2013 Biological Assessment Celanese Methanol Project Table of Contents Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................1-1 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Clean Air Act ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Endangered Species Act .................................................................................. 1-2 2 Project Description .......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Purpose and Need...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Biggest Public Land Grab'
    THE ZEPHYR/ FEBRUARY-MARCH 2013 ‘THE BIGGEST PUBLIC LAND GRAB’ The ‘Green Energy Boom’ & Mainstream Environmentalism Jim Stiles Sometimes the endless open spaces of the West impress me most when I can’t see corporations investing millions of dollars in this public land grab for green energy are them at all. names we know— One night when I was a ranger at the Arches National Park campground, I en- * British Petroleum (BP), who plans a 48,000 acre wind farm in northwest Arizona. countered a woman so terrified she could barely speak. She was from New York City, * Nextera, an energy giant based in Florida, builds fossil fuel, nuclear plants, wind and camping for the first time in her life, and had pitched her tent next to the campground solar farms. They recently destroyed a bald eagle nest in Ontario, Canada to make way “comfort station.” She felt comforted by the 200 watt security lights. When our genera- for a wind farm. tor failed that evening, the lights in the toilet went out as well and the woman was on the * Duke Energy builds coal and nuke plants but are testing the green energy market verge of a breakdown. Through stifled sobs, she explained that she had never been in in Wyoming and Texas. They want to build the Searchlight Wind Project in the Mojave total darkness before. Desert. “Never?” I repeated. * Pattern Energy built the Spring Valley Wind Farm next to Great Basin National “Never!” she replied. Park, Nevada and the Ocotillo Wind Express Wind Farm near Anza Borrego State Park, What a tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Energy: 57 Glossary Big Wave of Development Expected
    TABLE OF CONTENTS | SCOTTMADDEN, INC. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 03 Executive Summary: 42 100% Clean Energy and Net-Zero Strategies: Running Up That Hill Looking at Transition Strategies 04 Back to the Future for Hydrogen: 53 The Energy Industry: Taking Another Run at a Hydrogen Economy In Charts 15 Offshore Wind Energy: 57 Glossary Big Wave of Development Expected 25 Electricity Markets: Looking Back—and Ahead: 59 Recent Insights: Wholesale Power Markets Seek to Adapt to Available at scottmadden.com Changing Priorities 60 Energy Practice: 34 Regulatory Responses to COVID-19: ScottMadden Knows Energy Tracking Impacts and Preparing Strategies for Recovery EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RUNNING UP THAT HILL | SCOTTMADDEN, INC. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RUNNING UP THAT HILL So, what does Kate Bush’s art pop hit of 1985 have to do with energy in 2020? In the midst of and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, many efforts in the energy industry can feel like running uphill. Differences in policy and commodity preferences have pushed electricity markets to evolve in ways unanticipated when they were formed. The pandemic is forcing state utilities and regulators to answer tough questions about customer service and to prepare strategies for cost recovery. Notwithstanding the current “run up that hill,” certain initiatives are gaining momentum. Many companies with net-zero carbon emissions goals are shifting focus from their long-term objectives to near-term steps to get there. Both the electric and gas industries are studying and testing hydrogen’s potential role in a future energy system. Offshore wind energy offers unique advantages, some limitations, and is also gaining traction in the United States.
    [Show full text]