DOCSLIB.ORG

(PECKFIELD), GARFORTH, LEEDS; THEIR NATURE, POTENTIAL USES, and PROSPECTS for EVENTUAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY for MR CHRISTOPHER MAKIN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(PECKFIELD), GARFORTH, LEEDS; THEIR NATURE, POTENTIAL USES, and PROSPECTS for EVENTUAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY for MR CHRISTOPHER MAKIN Upton House Market Street Charlbury Oxfordshire, OX7 3PJ United Kingdom tel +44 (0)1608 810374 fax +44 (0)1608 810093 e-mail [email protected] www.gwp.uk.com NOTE ON THE MINERAL RESOURCES BENEATH SITES HG2-124 AND BL1-40 (PECKFIELD), GARFORTH, LEEDS; THEIR NATURE, POTENTIAL USES, AND PROSPECTS FOR EVENTUAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY For MR CHRISTOPHER MAKIN August 2018 GWP Consultants LLP Registered No. OC326183 Registered Office: Upton House, Market Street, Charlbury, Oxfordshire, OX7 3PJ, UK Report Title: Note on the mineral resources beneath Sites HG2-124 and BL1-40 (Peckfield), Garforth, Leeds; their nature, potential uses, and prospects for eventual economic recovery Client: Mr Christopher Makin Job: PECK Report Number: 180807 Issue Status: Final, issued Issue Date: 22nd August 2018 Prepared by: Ruth Allington Approved by: Alan Cobb Date: 22/08/18 Signature: This document is based on GWP report template v1.04 and Normal template v3.09 03/01/18 This report has been prepared by GWP Consultants LLP (GWP) on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client‘s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which GWP has not given its prior written consent, is at that person‘s own risk and may be an infringement of GWP‘s copyright. Furthermore the report is issued on the understanding that GWP‘s general terms and conditions of engagement are accepted, copies of which are available on request. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Instructions .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope and structure of this note ................................................................................ 1 2. INFORMATION RELIED UPON IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS NOTE ........................... 2 3. GEOLOGICAL SETTING OF THE SUBJECT SITE ........................................................... 3 3.1 Magnesian Limestone deposit .................................................................................... 3 3.1.1 Distribution and description ....................................................................................... 3 3.1.2 Uses of Lower Magnesian Limestone from this locality in 1938 ..................................... 5 3.2 Basal Permian Sand deposit ....................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Distribution, description and mining history ................................................................ 7 3.2.2 Uses of Basal Permian Sand in 1938 ........................................................................... 9 5. RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS POSED ................................................................... 9 5.1 Magnesian Limestone deposit .................................................................................... 9 5.1.1 Was the limestone beneath the site regarded in the vernacular of the mining world, the commercial world and landowners as a ”mineral‘ in 1938? ....................................................................................................................... 9 5.1.2 If the limestone beneath the subject site was regarded as a ”mineral‘ in 1938, did this mineral have any special characteristics, properties or uses that would distinguish it from other limestone? If so, what were they? ........................................................................................................................ 9 5.1.3 Would it be possible and potentially viable to recover limestone from beneath the subject site in an underground mine? How would this be done? ....................................................................................................................... 9 5.2 Basal Permian Sand deposit ..................................................................................... 10 5.2.1 Was the Permian Sand beneath the site regarded in the vernacular of the mining world, the commercial world and landowners as a ”mineral‘ in 1938? ................................................................................................................. 10 5.2.2 If the limestone beneath the subject site was regarded as a ”mineral‘ in 1938, did this mineral have any special characteristics, properties or uses that would distinguish it from other sand? If so, what were they? ..................... 11 5.2.3 What is the extent of the sand beneath the site and would it be possible and potentially viable to recover it from beneath this site in an underground mine? If so, how would this be done? ................................................. 11 FIGURES Figure 1 The outcrop of the Permian Magnesian Limestone Figure 2 The distribution of the Carboniferous Limestone in the British Isles Figure 3 Diagram illustrating the potential surface impacts of collapse of Basal Permian Sand mines Figure 4 Extract from Drawing No. PECK1808-1 showing details of the Basal Permian Sand from Barclay et al 1990 and the location of GroundTech exploratory boreholes 2018 Figure 5 Sketch illustrating the geometry of room and pillar mine workings DRAWINGS PECK1808-1 The Site and other localities and features referred to in the report. 1/25,000 Mineral resources at Peckfield Mr Christopher Makin 180807.v04 22/08/18 i APPENDICES Appendix 1 Summary CV, Ruth Allington Appendix 2 Information about the tunnels excavated in Lower Magnesian Limestone at Micklefield Quarry Appendix 3 Information about Portland Stone mining on the Isle of Portland, Dorset Appendix 4 Photographs and diagrams of former Basal Permian Sand mining and its impacts Mineral resources at Peckfield Mr Christopher Makin 180807.v04 22/08/18 ii NOTE ON THE MINERAL RESOURCES BENEATH SITES HG2-124 AND BL1- 40 (PECKFIELD), GARFORTH, LEEDS; THEIR NATURE, POTENTIAL USES, AND PROSPECTS FOR EVENTUAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY 1. INTRODUCTION I am Ruth Allington, a Chartered Geologist and Chartered Engineer with 37 years‘ experience in the evaluation of the mineral potential of green field sites in the UK and overseas and in the design of quarries and mines to recover the mineral reserves they contain economically, whilst limiting their environmental and social impacts. My experience especially relates to resources and reserves of construction materials and industrial minerals; my CV is included with this note at Appendix 1. I have been providing technical support and advice to Mr Makin and his legal and professional advisors in relation to the Peckfield site since August 2017. 1.1 Instructions This note is intended to provide technical support to Mr Makin‘s legal representatives in preparing the relevant section of the —Position Statement between: (1) BDW Homes and Taylor Wimpey (—BDW/TW“) (2) Mr Christopher Makin (3) Leeds City Council (—LCC“)“. I have been asked to address the following questions regarding the geology and minerals potential of the subject site: Magnesian Limestone deposit • Was the limestone beneath the site regarded in the vernacular of the mining world, the commercial world and landowners as a ”mineral‘ in 1938? • If the limestone beneath the subject site was regarded as a ”mineral‘ in 1938, did this mineral have any special characteristics, properties or uses that would distinguish it from other limestone? If so, what were they? • Would it be possible and potentially viable to recover limestone from beneath the subject site in an underground mine? If yes, how would this be done? Permian Sand at the base of the Magnesian Limestone deposit • Was the Permian Sand beneath the site regarded in the vernacular of the mining world, the commercial world and landowners as a ”mineral‘ in 1938? • If the Permian Sand beneath the subject site was regarded as a ”mineral‘ in 1938, did this mineral have any special characteristics, properties or uses that would distinguish it from other sand? If so, what were they? • What is the extent of the sand beneath the site and would it be possible and potentially viable to recover it from beneath this site in an underground mine? If yes, how would this be done? 1.2 Scope and structure of this note This note is presented in 4 sections following this introduction: Section 2: Information relied upon in the preparation of this note A summary of the information relied upon in the preparation of this note. This includes texts on geology and minerals dating from the 1920s and 1930s as well as more up-to-date geological information and planning context. Section 3: Geological setting of the subject site A description of the geological setting of the subject site and summary of what was known about the occurrence and properties of the limestone and sand, and what they were used for in 1938. Section 4: Responses to the questions posed Mineral resources at Peckfield Mr Christopher Makin 180807.v04 22/08/18 Page 1 of 11 2. INFORMATION RELIED UPON IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS NOTE In addition to documents relating to this site provided to me by Mr Makin‘s legal representative, I have consulted the following published and publicly available information in the course of preparing this note: • Geological maps, memoirs and borehole records published and/or made available online by the British Geological Survey, particularly: o Edwards, W., Mitchell, G. H. and Whitehead, T. (1950). Geology of the District North and East of Leeds; Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, explanation of one-inch
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And Later Prehistoric and Romano-British Trackways
    Chadwick, A. (2016). Foot-fall and Hoof-hit. Agencies, Movements, Materialities, and Identities; and Later Prehistoric and Romano-British Trackways. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(01), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977431500027X Peer reviewed version License (if available): Other Link to published version (if available): 10.1017/S095977431500027X Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Cambridge University Press at https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977431500027X . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Foot-fall and hoof-hit. Agencies, movements, materialities, and identities; and later prehistoric and Romano-British trackways Holloway – the hollow way. A sunken path, a deep and shady lane. A route that centuries of foot-fall, hoof-hit, wheel-roll and rain run have harrowed into the land. (Macfarlane, Donwood and Richards 2012, 3). Introduction A 2013 research seminar hosted by the EngLaId project1 examined whether or not landscapes are invested with agency, reflecting theoretical discussions which propose that people, other living organisms and objects are entangled within meshworks or assemblages of relational agency. This paper builds upon these debates through case studies of later prehistoric and Romano-British trackways from Yorkshire and Nottinghamshire. It argues that agency resided in and was enacted through constraints and affordances between people, animals, and the material, lived-in world.
    [Show full text]
  • Allerton Bywater, Leeds
    Allerton Bywater, Leeds Key details Name Allerton Bywater Millennium Community Location Leeds, West Yorkshire Number of dwellings 562 Date first homes sold 2006 Homes delivered to date More than 380 Percentage of affordable homes 25%, pepper-potted across site Average house price £193,000 Road vehicle trips forecast Phase 4 residential (191 dwellings) – 113 AM trips, 122 PM trips; phase 4 commercial – 79 AM trips, 140 PM trips. Parking provision 1.6 spaces per unit (phases 1 and 2); ~2 spaces per unit (phases 3 and 4) Walking distance to railway station 43 minutes Size of site 23 ha Housing density 40-50 dph in phases 3 and 4; (24.4 dph gross including green areas) Planning guidance Initial application PPG3; phase 4 application NPPF 1 Background and context of development The village of Allerton Bywater lies six miles south east of Leeds, West Yorkshire. With long-standing links to the coal industry, the village was home to the last remaining colliery in Leeds, which closed in 1992. Prior to development of the Millennium Community, Allerton Bywater had a population of around 4,000. Allerton Bywater Millennium Community was announced by John Prescott in 1998 as the second Millennium Community, after Greenwich in south east London. It lies on the former site of Allerton Colliery, control of which passed from the National Coal Board to English Partnerships (now the Homes and Communities Agency) in 1995. Initial work focused on land remediation and decontamination, dealing with issues relating to the legacy of the colliery such as capping pit-shafts. Flood alleviation was also necessary as the site lies within the River Aire floodplain and severe floods occurred in 2000 and 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Political Oratory and Itinerant Lecturing in Yorkshire and the North East in the Age of Chartism, 1837-60 Janette Lisa M
    Popular political oratory and itinerant lecturing in Yorkshire and the North East in the age of Chartism, 1837-60 Janette Lisa Martin This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of York Department of History January 2010 ABSTRACT Itinerant lecturers declaiming upon free trade, Chartism, temperance, or anti- slavery could be heard in market places and halls across the country during the years 1837- 60. The power of the spoken word was such that all major pressure groups employed lecturers and sent them on extensive tours. Print historians tend to overplay the importance of newspapers and tracts in disseminating political ideas and forming public opinion. This thesis demonstrates the importance of older, traditional forms of communication. Inert printed pages were no match for charismatic oratory. Combining personal magnetism, drama and immediacy, the itinerant lecturer was the most effective medium through which to reach those with limited access to books, newspapers or national political culture. Orators crucially united their dispersed audiences in national struggles for reform, fomenting discussion and coalescing political opinion, while railways, the telegraph and expanding press reportage allowed speakers and their arguments to circulate rapidly. Understanding of political oratory and public meetings has been skewed by over- emphasis upon the hustings and high-profile politicians. This has generated two misconceptions: that political meetings were generally rowdy and that a golden age of political oratory was secured only through Gladstone’s legendary stumping tours. However, this thesis argues that, far from being disorderly, public meetings were carefully regulated and controlled offering disenfranchised males a genuine democratic space for political discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Land & Premises, Ridge Road, Ledston Luck, LEEDS, LS25
    FOR SALE (MAY LET) EXTENSIVE OPEN STORAGE LAND WITH INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS Industrial Land & Premises, Ridge Road, Ledston Luck, LEEDS, LS25 CONTACT US Located within approximately 10 minutes of M1, A1(M) Strictly by prior appointment with Colliers International, through: and M62 Motorways. Jonathan McGrael Central location to serve West Yorkshire and wider region. Logistics & Industrial +44 113 200 1863 Established industrial location [email protected] Extensive site of approximately 4 ¼ acres Property Ref: 20961 Buildings fitted to a modern specification totalling 34,159 sq ft (3,173.48 sq m) Colliers International 15-16 Park Row LEEDS Total Site – 4.26 acres (1.73 ha) LS1 5HD +44 113 200 1800 www.colliers.com/uk/industrial Industrial Land & Premises, Ridge Road, Ledston Luck, LEEDS LOCATION ACCOMMODATION Ledston Luck is situated in West Yorkshire approximately 8 miles east of Leeds City Centre located between Garforth, 2 Total Site Area 4.26 acres (1.73 ha) miles to the north and Castleford, 3 miles to the south positioned on the A656 Ridge Road. Building 1 9,564 sq ft (888.58 sq m) Building 2 3,497 sq ft (324.90 sq m) The site is located centrally providing comparatively traffic-free Building 3 21,098 sq ft (1,960.06 sq m) access to the motorway network in all directions as shown TOTAL 34,159 sq ft (3,173.48 sq m) below: RATEABLE VALUE The property is currently assessed for rates purposes by M1 Junction 47 2.6 miles 5 minutes Leeds City Council. We understand that the buildings are A1(M) Junction 42 3.7 miles 8 minutes currently assessed separately.
    [Show full text]
  • Garforth Gala Quiz Questions Answers 1. Where Can You Play Tennis in Garforth? 1
    Garforth Gala Quiz Questions Answers 1. Where can you play tennis in Garforth? 1. There are 2 tennis courts on Barleyhill Recreational ground 2. Where were the sites of the Sisters, Isabella and Trench pits? 2. The Sisters pit was north of the railway line ( Sisters Villas on the Barwick Road, The Isabella pit was at East Garforth,The Trench pit was on Ninelands Lane ( Stocks site ) 3. What was Main Street originally called? ( hint what is Main Street’s latest 3. Main St was originally called Briggate addition? ) 4. What was Sturton Lane originally called? 4. Sturton Lane was originally called Paradise. 5. Where are Garforth’s listed buildings / monuments ( there are 5 ) 5. Garforth’s listed buildings are : St Mary’s Church, The footbridge at Garforth Station, The Railway bridge over the Barwick road, the road bridge over the railway lines at Garforth station, A milestone on the Wakefield Road just past Alandale Rd going south, a milepost on the Selby Road opposite the Crusader, a milepost on the Aberford Road near Saxton Court. 6. Which is the oldest pub in Garforth? 6. The Gaping Goose is reputed to be the oldest pub in Garforth, possibly the building drawn on a 1792 map of Garforth 7. How many houses are there in Garforth (approximately ) 1000, 3000, 7. There are approximately 6,000 houses in Garforth, difficult to be exact as 6000,8000? new ones built since the last census in 2011 8. How many more houses does Leeds Council want to build in Garforth 8. Leeds City Council have plans to build approximately another 2,500 houses 200,700,1500,2500? in Garforth, 2314 on the site behind the Water Tower on Garforth Cliff and another 238 on the old Stocks site Ninelands Lane 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Allerton Bywater Design Codes
    ALLERTON BYWATER DESIGN CODES ... DESIGNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE... MAY 2005 CONTENTS 01: THE ALLERTON BYWATER DESIGN CODES 1.1 THE PURPOSE OF THE DESIGN CODES 1.2 THE DESIGN PROCESS 1.3 HOW THE DESIGN CODES FIT INTO THE DEVELOPERS PROCESS 1.4 ORGANISATION AND NAVIGATION OF THE DESIGN CODES 02 APPRECIATING THE CONTEXT 2.1 MILLENNIUM COMMUNITIES 2.2 PLANNING CONTEXT 2.3 VILLAGE CONTEXT 2.4 LOCAL STUDY 03: SUSTAINABILITY 3.1 COMPONENTS OF SUSTAINABILITY 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 04 CREATING THE URBAN STRUCTURE 4.1 PLACE MAKING AT ALLERTON BYWATER 4.2 STRUCTURING ALLERTON BYWATER 4.3 THE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 4.4 LAND USE 4.5 BUILDING HEIGHTS 4.6 DENSITY 4.7 LANDMARKS, CORNERS AND EDGES 4.8 BLOCKS 4.9 BUILDING TYPES 4.10 OPEN SPACE 4.11 PLAY 05 MAKING THE CONNECTIONS 5.1 STREET HIERARCHY – MAIN STREET, BOULEVARD AND HOMEZONES 5.2 PARKING 5.3 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLE MOVEMENT 5.4 SERVICING 5.5 PUBLIC TRANSPORT 06 DETAILING THE PLACE 6.1 BOUNDARY TREATMENTS 6.2 BUILDING MATERIALS AND FEATURES 6.3 STREET FURNITURE 6.4 UTILITY 6.5 RUBBISH FACILITIES 6.6 CONCLUSION 07 CONCLUSION APPENDIX • Location Plan 3 4 01: ALLERTON BYWATER DESIGN CODES 1.1 THE PURPOSE The code is based on established principles of Leeds City Architecture – in particular, experience in designing and OF THE DESIGN CODES Council’s ‘Neighbourhood for Living’ and ODPM and CABE integrating environmental technologies with housing The Deputy Prime Minister is currently promoting the use national guidance. development; of Design Codes in order to achieve both improved quality of development and greater speed in the delivery of 1.2 THE DESIGN PROCESS Landscape Architecture – design of the public realm and new housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Archaeological Research Framework: Research Agenda
    Yorkshire Archaeological Research Framework: research agenda A report prepared for the Yorkshire Archaeological Research Framework Forum and for English Heritage – project number 2936 RFRA S. Roskams and M. Whyman (Department of Archaeology, University of York) Date: May, 2007 ABSTRACT This report represents the outcome of research undertaken into the extent, character and accessibility of archaeological resources of Yorkshire. It puts forward a series of proposals which would allow us to develop their use as a research and curatorial tool in the region. These involve systematically testing the evidence for patterning in the data, augmenting the present database, and establishing the research priorities for the Palaeolithic to the Early Modern period. Acknowledgements: to be completed YARFF members as a whole plus, at least,: Helen Gomersall (WYAS) Graham Lee (NYM) Robert White (Dales) Peter Cardwell Pete Wilson Marcus Jeacock Margaret Faull David Cranstone James Symonds, Rod MacKenzie and Hugh Wilmott Mike Gill Jan Harding Martin Roe Graham Hague Relevant YAT staff Aleks McClain Regional curatorial staff 2 CONTENTS Summary 4 Introduction 7 Section 1. Testing, Accessing and Augmenting Yorkshire’s Databases 10 1.1 Testing the Resource Assessment database 1.2 The relationship between the Resource Assessment database and Yorkshire HERs 1.3 Museum holdings 1.4 Enhancing the quality of recent commercial data holdings 1.5 Remote sensing evidence 1.6 Waterlogged and coastal evidence 1.7 Industrial archaeology 1.8 Standing buildings 1.9 Documentary sources 1.10 Human resources Section 2. Period Priorities 20 2.1 The Palaeolithic period 2.2 The Mesolithic period 2.3 The Neolithic period 2.4 The Bronze Age 2.5 The Iron Age 2.6 The Romano-British Period 2.7 The Early Medieval Period 2.8 The High Medieval Period 2.9 The Early Modern period/Industrial Archaeology Bibliography 39 3 SUMMARY This report draws together the implications of the papers presented by Manby et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Castleford Part of 1:50 000 Sheet 78 (Wakefield) J
    Natural Environment Research Council BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geological Survey of England and Wales Geological notes and local details for 1:lO 000 sheets-. c Sheet SE 42 NW - Castleford Part of 1:50 000 sheet 78 (Wakefield) J. R. A. Giles Bibliographical reference Giles, J. R. A. 1987 Geological notes and local details for 1:lO 000 sh-eets: Sheet SE 42 NW (Castleford) (Keyworth: British GeologicalSurvey) Author J. R, A. Giles, BSc British Geological Survey Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 SGG Production of this report was funded by the Departmentof the Environment. The views expressed in this report are not necessarily thoseof the Department of the Environment. BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, KEYWORTH 1987 C, Crown copyright 1987. LIMITATIONS Thisreport hasbeen produced collationby and interpretation of, andinterpolation from,geological, geotechnicaland related data from a widevarity of sources. It has been derived from results contained in the maps and reports listed in Table 1 each of which give details of the various sources of the data. This report provides only a general description of the nature and extent of factors relevant to the planning of land use and development. The data on which this report is based is not comprehensive and its quality is variable, and this report reflects the limitations of that data. Localised or anomalous features and conditions may not be represented, and any boundaries shown are only approximate. The dates of the geological mappingare shown in Table 1 and noinformation made available after these dates has been taken into account. For this reason:- THIS REPORT PROVIDES ONLY GENERAL INDICATIONS OF GROUND CONDITIONS AND MUST NOT BE RELIED AS UPON A SOURCE OF DETAILEDINFORMATION ABOUT SPECIFIC AREAS, OR AS SUBSTITUTE FOR SITE INVESTIGATIONS OR GROUND SURVEYS.
    [Show full text]
  • 163 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    163 bus time schedule & line map 163 Castleford - Leeds View In Website Mode The 163 bus line (Castleford - Leeds) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Castleford <-> Leeds City Centre: 5:37 AM - 9:30 PM (2) Garforth <-> Castleford: 6:07 AM (3) Leeds City Centre <-> Castleford: 6:10 AM - 10:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 163 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 163 bus arriving. Direction: Castleford <-> Leeds City Centre 163 bus Time Schedule 84 stops Castleford <-> Leeds City Centre Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 10:30 AM - 9:30 PM Monday 5:37 AM - 9:30 PM Bus Station Stand K, Castleford Albion Street, England Tuesday 5:37 AM - 9:30 PM Bank Street, Castleford Wednesday 5:37 AM - 9:30 PM Back Bank Street, Castleford Thursday 5:37 AM - 9:30 PM Aire Street, Castleford Friday 5:37 AM - 9:30 PM Aire Street, Castleford Saturday 5:10 AM - 9:30 PM Lock Lane Sports Centre, Castleford Hunt Street, Castleford Allerton Ings, Allerton Bywater 163 bus Info Newton Lane, Allerton Bywater Direction: Castleford <-> Leeds City Centre A656, Ledston Civil Parish Stops: 84 Trip Duration: 77 min Park Avenue, Allerton Bywater Line Summary: Bus Station Stand K, Castleford, Bank Street, Castleford, Aire Street, Castleford, Lock Kiln Park, Allerton Bywater Lane Sports Centre, Castleford, Allerton Ings, Allerton Bywater, Newton Lane, Allerton Bywater, Vicars Terrace, Allerton Bywater Park Avenue, Allerton Bywater, Kiln Park, Allerton Bywater, Vicars Terrace, Allerton Bywater, Manor Manor Park
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda, Full Council 2021 01 27
    LEDSHAM PARISH COUNCIL NOTICE OF A MEETING OF THE COUNCIL You are hereby summoned to attend a meeting of Ledsham Parish Council to be held on Wednesday 27th January 2021 commencing at 7pm for the purpose of transacting the following business. Due to the current coronavirus epidemic and further to the Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020 the meeting will be held virtually via Zoom (https://zoom.us/j/95310211510). Mr C Pilkington Clerk to Ledsham Parish Council AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES To receive apologies for absence and to approve reasons for absence 2. DECLARATION OF DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY AND OTHER INTERESTS (a) To receive disclosures by members of any disclosable pecuniary interests for the purposes of Section 31 of the Localism Act 2011 and any other relevant interests under the Members’ Code of Conduct (b) To receive and decide upon requests for dispensations to councilors to take part in discussions and votes where they have declared disclosable pecuniary interests 3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SESSION To receive questions, comments, and suggestions for items for further consideration by the Parish Council from members of the public 4. PARISH COUNCIL MEETINGS (a) To receive and confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Parish Council held on Wednesday 9th December 2020 (b) To receive and confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Parish Council held on Tuesday 22nd December 2020 (c) To receive and confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Staffing Committee held on Monday 11th January 2021 5.
    [Show full text]
  • LEDSTON & OWL WOOD (4.5 Miles)
    LEDSTON & OWL WOOD (4.5 miles) A relatively easy-going 4.5 mile walk taking in the villages of Kippax and Ledston along with Owl Wood near Allerton Bywater. The paths through Owl Wood can be muddy after wet weather. There are no stiles on this walk however; there is a short steep hill to walk back into Kippax towards the end. Start Point: Kippax Co-operative Supermarket, High Street, Kippax, Leeds Kippax: There is no written evidence of Roman Kippax but the road to the East of the village, Ridge Road which we cross twice on this walk, is on the line of the Roman road from Castleford to York. This together with the Domesday entry of ‘Chipesh’ means there have been people living here from early times. The Domesday Survey of 1086 is about the earliest documentary evidence for Kippax and valued the village at £16. Coal Mining is mentioned about 1320 and has been an important industry in Kippax and the immediate area until the last mine in the district closed in 1992 (at Allerton Bywater). There have been many mines in the village, at least three just beyond the top of the High Street in the last 150 years. The population of the village in the 14th Century is thought to have been about 150/200 based on figures found in a Charter relating to Pontefract Castle, which was a substantial village for that period. The church which is the oldest building in the village is thought by experts to have been built by the Normans in a possible late Saxon style.
    [Show full text]
  • Countryside Live Learning Outside the Classroom Teachers' Handbook
    Countryside Live at The Ledston Estate Learning Outside the Classroom Wednesday 18 and Thursday 19 May 2011 Teachers’ Handbook 1 Countryside Live at The Ledston Estate Teachers’ Handbook Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. List of schools attending 4 3. Location and Directions - Description 5 Maps 6 4. Arrangements for the day 7-8 5. Overview of activities at Countryside Live 9 6. Sheep Show sessions timetable Wed & Thurs 10 7. Arena Programme 11 8. Site Overview 12 9. Site Index 13 10. Site Plan 14 11. Descriptions of Activities 15-24 2 Countryside Live - Introduction Countryside Live is coming to Yorkshire for the sixth time. Thanks to funding from the Wheler Foundation the Countryside Foundation for Education is able to bring this fantastic event to The Ledston Estate near Castleford again in 2011. Countryside Live, a country fair for school children, is one of the Countryside Foundation’s major Learning Outside the Classroom events. It has been run at two venues in London for several years. The first event taking place at Syon Park in Middlesex in 2000. Countryside Live at Lee Valley Park, East London will be run for the 9th consecutive year in 2011. The Ledston Estate provides the perfect location for “Countryside Live”. A resourced, prepared and extended, worthwhile and fun educational experience! Demonstrations, displays and hands-on activities. School children will have the opportunity to enjoy products and produce from the countryside and understand how they form part of the daily lives of city, town and country people alike. They will enjoy a full main arena programme that runs throughout the day and take part in many hands-on activities.
    [Show full text]