DOCSLIB.ORG

Jbtsvolume 4 | Issue 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jbtsvolume 4 | Issue 2 Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies JBTSVOLUME 4 | ISSUE 2 207 Book Review Article of Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account Paul R. Hinlicky 215 Book Review Article of Divine Simplicity: Christ the Crisis of Metaphysics Steven J. Duby 224 Response to Steven J. Duby Paul R. Hinlicky 228 Response to Paul R. Hinlicky Steven J. Duby 232 Idolatry: A Rhetorical-Critical Analysis of Deuteronomy 4:15–16, 23 Joshua K. Smith 243 “If Christ be not Raised”; If Peter was not the First Pope: Parallel Cases of Indispensable Doctrinal Foundations Jerry L. Walls 264 Early Christian Liturgy: A Reconstruction of All Known Liturgical Components and Their Respective Order Andrew Messmer 280 Reforming Credobaptism: A Westminster Alternative for Reformed Baptist Identity Jordan L. Steffaniak 301 “It’s the Wrath of God”: Reflections on Inferring Divine Punishment James S. Spiegel 317 Comparative Ecclesiology: Roger Haight’s Christian Community in History for Evangelical Resourcement Justin L. McLendon 334 Book Reviews Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies JBTS is published online at www.jbtsonline.org and in print through Pickwick Publications, an Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers 199 West 8th Avenue, Suite 3, Eugene, OR 97401, USA Print ISSN 2572-2832 Online ISSN 2572-2859 Copyright © 2019 Grand Canyon University, College of Theology. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical publications or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission from the publisher. Write: Permissions, Wipf and Stock Publishers, 199 West 8th Avenue, Suite 3, Eugene, OR 97401, USA The Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies (JBTS) is a peer reviewed academic journal focused on the fields of Bible and Theology from an inter-denominational point of view. The journal is comprised of an editorial board of scholars that represent several academic institutions throughout the world. JBTS is concerned with presenting high level original scholarship in an approachable way. Academic journals are often written by scholars for other scholars. They are technical in nature, assuming a robust knowledge of the field. There are fewer journals that seek to introduce biblical and theological scholarship that is also accessible to students. JBTS seeks to provide high-level scholarship and research to both scholars and students, which results in original scholarship that is readable and accessible. As an inter-denominational journal, JBTS is broadly evangelical. We accept contributions in all theological disciplines from any evangelical perspective. In particular, we encourage articles and book reviews within the fields of Old Testament, New Testament, Biblical Theology, Church History, Systematic Theology, Practical Theology, Philosophical Theology, Philosophy, and Ethics. Please see the guidelines for submission at jbtsonline.org. Since JBTS is a broadly evangelical journal there will often be a variety of views that are represented that align with the evangelical Christian faith within each journal issue. The views expressed by contributors are not necessarily the views of the editors or the institutions that they represent. Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies EDITORS General Editor: Daniel S. Diffey (Grand Canyon University) Managing Editor: Ryan A. Brandt (Grand Canyon University) Managing Editor: Justin L. McLendon (Grand Canyon University) Senior Editor: Paul Raabe (Grand Canyon University) ASSOCIATE EDITORS Old Testament: Adam Howell (Boyce College) New Testament: Channing Crisler (Anderson University) Philosophical and Theological Studies: Joshua Farris (Houston Baptist University) BOOK REVIEW EDITORS Historical Theology: Chad Brand (Oklahoma Baptist University) History of Christianity: Amber Thomas Reynolds (Wheaton College) Christianity and Culture: Rodolfo Galvan Estrada III (LABI College) Ministry and Pastoral Theology: Adam Wyatt (Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary) New Testament: Luke Hoselton (Grand Canyon University) Old Testament: Adam Howell (Boyce College) Philosophy, Ethics, and Apologetics: Roger Turner (Walters State Community College) Philosophy of Religion and Analytic Theology: J. T. Turner (Fuller Theological Seminary) Systematic and Philosophical Theology: Joanna Leidenhag (University of Edinburgh) PRODUCTION AND DESIGN Production Editor: Dawn Juhas Production Editor: Kelsey Kowacz Graphic Designer: Jason Boesel EDITORIAL BOARD Paul Allen (Concordia University, Montreal, Canada) Uche Anizor (Talbot School of Theology, Biola University) Benjamin Blackwell (Houston Baptist University) Simon Burton (University of Warsaw) Byron G. Curtis (Geneva College) Dan DeWitt (Cedarville University) Matthew Emerson (Oklahoma Baptist University) Kevin Giles (Retired Scholar, Melbourne, Australia) J. R. Gilhooly (Cedarville University) Greg Lanier (Reformed Theological Seminary, Orlando, FL) David R. Maxwell (Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, MO) Clinton Ohlers (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) John Mark N. Reynolds (The Saint Constantine School and King’s College) Bethany Sollereder (University of Oxford) Owen Strachan (Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary) Brad D. Strawn (Fuller Theological Seminary) Daniel von Wachter (International Academy of Philosophy, Gamprin, Liechtenstein) Divine Simplicity: Article Reviews and Responses By Paul R. Hinlicky and Steven J. Duby A Brief Editorial Note The editors invited Paul R. Hinlicky and Steven J. Duby to review one another’s books on the topic of divine simplicity. The following presents their respective review articles and then their responses to one another’s review. The order is as follows: 1. Paul R. Hinlicky’s review article of Duby’s book, Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account 2. Steven J. Duby’s review article of Hinlicky’s book, Divine Simplicity: Christ the Crisis of Metaphysics 3. Paul R. Hinlicky’s response to Duby 4. Steven J. Duby’s response to Hinlicky The editors would like to thank both Paul and Steve for participating in this friendly engagement. We believe that Christian scholarship is strengthen by dialogue across different Christian traditions. Paul and Steve exemplify this dialogue well between themselves. The editors would also like to thank Mark R. Kreitzer for initially suggesting that this dialogue take place in JBTS. Ryan A. Brandt Managing Editor [JBTS 4.2 (2019): 207–214] Divine Simplicity: Article Reviews and Responses By Paul R. Hinlicky and Steven J. Duby Book Review Article of Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account PAUL R. HINLICKY Paul R. Hinlicky is Tise Professor of Lutheran Studies, Roanoke College and Graduate Faculty, Institute of Lutheran Theology Steven J. Duby, Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account. London and New York: T & T Clark Studies in Systematic Theology, 2016. Steven J. Duby has written an excellent work of theological scholarship in support of what is, to my mind, a dubious cause. He writes as a restorationist of Reformed scholastic orthodoxy (pp. 3, 122), and in “dogmatics” he deploys a pre-critical method of garnering and systematizing propositions found in Scripture (Lindbeck’s “propositionalism”1). This restorationism hinges upon two special commitments which recur regularly throughout the work: first, the interpretation of Trinitarian persons as modalities of the single deity-person (pp. 24, 121, 155, 158, 218, 227-8), a move which, following Augustine, confounds the crucial distinction between ousia and hypostasis worked out by the Cappadocians between Nicea and Constantinople; and second, also following Augustine, the corresponding assignment of God taken “absolutely” to the category of “nature” or “essence,” treating, then, Father, Son and Holy Spirit as the same divine substance taken “relatively” (e.g., p. 222). Referencing the Athanasian Creed, Duby writes in conclusion: “With the distinctio modalis in hand, one can identify each of the persons as the one God and then, given that each person is not identical with God absolutely or exhaustively but just as a certain modus subsistendi and is thus distinct from God taken absolutely as modus rei a re, one can affirm that each of the persons is each modally and relatively distinct from the other persons as modi subsistendi” (p. 224). This conclusion yields what may be described as a psychological model of the Trinity as opposed to the social model given to us in Jesus’ high priestly prayer (John 17:20-26). God is thought 1. George A. Lindbeck, The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Post-Liberal Age (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1984). With respect to theological method I make the same critique of neo-scholastic Lutheran restorationists. See my “Prima Scriptura: Saving Sola Scriptura from Itself,” Dialog 55/3 (Fall 2016): 223-30. 207 Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies 4.2 to be one as mind subsisting in the modalities of thinking, thinking itself and willing itself in splendid, timeless and thus simple self-identity, hence as “divine simplicity.” By contrast, I have written about the Western doctrine of divine simplicity from the perspective of the criticisms of it, notably first by Karl Barth (on its tendency to quaternity, p. 32), Jürgen Moltmann (on its tendency to Sabellianism, pp. 40, 208- 9), followed by Colin Gunton, Eberhard Jüngel and especially Robert Jenson (who pioneered “patrology” as a retrieval of the Eastern pater est fons divinitatis, p. 170). These sources of mine (which Duby discusses only to reject) betray a specific level of disagreement between the author and myself on the basis of confession—the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: a Reply to Mark Edwards
    2020 TheoLogica An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology S. I. CONCILIAR TRINITARIANISM DOI: https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323 Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: A Reply to Mark Edwards R. T. MULLINS University of Edinburgh [email protected] Abstract: In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father. Keywords: Trinity, subordination, eternal generation, analytic theology Mark Edwards has provided us with an excellent overview of the different notions of Trinitarian subordination throughout parts of church history. Some readers will be surprised to find that certain notions of subordination are affirmed in conciliar Trinitarian thought, whilst others are not. I for one greatly appreciate the clarity that Edwards brings to this issue in his essay. His essay is not intended to be historically exhaustive, but rather offers snapshots into different time periods. Edwards starts his survey with the biblical material before moving on to the debates leading up to the Council of Nicaea, and the continuation of those debates in the aftermath of the Council. After this, Edwards takes a glance at the Protestant Reformation, and then offers an interesting discussion of the Trinitarian thought of John Milton, Ralph Cudworth, and George Bull.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology Without Borders
    Theology without Borders An Introduction to Global Conversations William A. Dyrness and Oscar García-Johnson K William A. Dyrness and Oscar Garcia-Johnson, Theology Without Borders Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2015. Used by permission. (Unpublished manuscript—copyright protected Baker Publishing Group) DyrnessGarciaJohnson_TheologyWithoutBorders_LC_wo.indd iii 9/8/15 1:13 PM © 2015 by William A. Dyrness and Oscar García-Johnson Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dyrness, William A. Theology without borders : an introduction to global conversations / William A. Dyrness and Oscar García-Johnson. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8010-4932-3 (pbk.) 1. Theology. 2. Christianity and culture. 3. Globalization—Religious aspects— Christianity. I. Title. BR118.D98 2015 230—dc23 2015023237 Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989, by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations labeled KJV are from the King James Version of the Bible. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 William A.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract This Dissertation Addresses a Lacuna in the Study of the Literary
    Abstract This dissertation addresses a lacuna in the study of the literary portrayals of divine retribution in the Old Testament. Focusing on narrative texts, this work posits the presence of the divine messenger opposition type-scene, conventional scenes in which an antagonist opposes a divine messenger on whom God inflicts extreme fates that often seem disproportionate to the offense and occur in the absence of any divine proscription. Opposition to the messenger seems to be the offense grave enough to merit the peculiar fates these characters experience. The introduction discusses how the historical analysis of divine retribution has been limited to theological treatments. Recent studies have slightly expanded the analysis to sociological and anthropological approaches, but literary approaches to the topic have been scant. Addressing the intersection of convention and historiography provides a foundation for moving the discussion forward. Employing a literary-critical treatment—supplemented by form-, source-, historical-, and redaction-critical approaches where beneficial—to multiple narrative passages reveals the presence of the proposed type-scene. Chapter 2 explores Moses as the prototypical prophet validated through the bizarre fates experienced by his opponents. Korah’s destruction, Miriam’s leprosy, and the biting serpents all represent divine responses to opposition to Moses. Korah’s rebellion represents a paradigmatic template of the type-scene, one in which God validates Moses. Chapter 3 examines the type-scene in narratives involving the classical prophets. The stories of Jeroboam’s deformity, Ahab’s death, the fiery death of Ahaziah’s military squads, the mauling by bears of Bethel youths, Gehazi’s leprosy, and the trampling of a court official during the siege of Samaria all utilize the type-scene in a manner that validates the legitimacy of a prophet.
    [Show full text]
  • On Reading the Bible As Scripture, Encountering the Church
    Perichoresis Volume 18.5 (2020): 67–86 DOI: 10.2478/perc-2020-0029 ON READING THE BIBLE AS SCRIPTURE, ENCOUNTERING THE CHURCH * STEVEN NEMES Fuller Theological Seminary ABSTRACT. As an exercise in the ‘theology of disclosure’, the present essay proposes a kind of phenomenological analysis of the act of reading the Bible as Scripture with the goal of bringing to light the theoretical commitments which it implicitly demands. This sort of analysis can prove helpful for the continuing disputes among Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox insofar as it is relevant for one of the principal points of controversy between them: namely, the rela- tionship between Scripture, Tradition, and Church as theological authorities. It proceeds by analyzing both the objective and subjective ‘poles’ of the act, and it illuminates the presence of the Church and her Tradition on both sides. The Church—i.e., the community of God’s peo- ple—is both that which is immediately encountered in the text, as well as the factor which ena- bles scriptural reading in the first place. The article terminates with an application of the in- sights of the preceding discussion to the controversy about icons. KEYWORDS: phenomenology of Scripture, Tradition, Bible, ecclesiology, icons Preliminary Remarks on the Phenomenology of Scripture The quincentenary of the Protestant Reformation invites careful reflection on persistent divisions which characterize Christian existence in the modern world. Though typically the disputes between Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox are often addressed hermeneutically, through the careful inter- pretation of particular critical passages, there is a prior question to be an- swered, one which promises fruit for the resolution of the seemingly inter- minable exegetical debates.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conversation with Jonathan Edwards and William Alston
    Towards a Model of Indwelling: A Conversation with Jonathan Edwards and William Alston Ray S. Yeo Carolina Graduate School of Divinity Abstract: In this paper I attempt to provide a model for understanding the theological, psychological and metaphysical dimensions of the Spirit’s indwelling in sanctifying grace by synthesizing Jonathan Edwards’ theological psychology with William Alston’ model of indwelling. However, despite its promise, the Edwards-Alston synthesis faces substantial difficulties associated with a literal and direct union between divinity and humanity. Nevertheless, the difficulties could be avoided if we take the mediatory role of Christ’s humanity more seriously and conceive of indwelling grace as an infusion of Christ’s human unitive drive through the Holy Spirit’s abiding presence within his people. 1. Introduction Central to the thought of Jonathan Edwards is his theologically sophisticated psychology of grace or what is sometimes called his “religious psychology of the heart” (Walton 2002, 5).1 Discussion of this important subject can be found not only in his famous Treatise Concerning Religious Affections but also throughout his vast corpus of writings including his sermons and miscellanies entries. Edwards’ understanding of the psychological functioning of grace may not be entirely original; much of what he says can be found in some form in his Puritan and Protestant forbearers.2 However, his treatment of the subject is unsurpassed in the Puritan literature in terms of the level of precision, thoroughness and systematic sophistication.3 Hence, it remains one of the deepest and most fecund theological psychologies of grace in the Protestant tradition and the heart of his account comes 1 Harold Simonson (2004, 5) claims that the notion of the sense of the heart “summarizes Edwards’s whole system of thought”.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does It Mean to Grieve the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 4:30)? 27 Joshua M
    1 Spring 2019 • Volume 16, Number 1 Spring 2019 • Vol. 16, No. 1 The Baptist Center for Theology and Ministry New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Editor-in-Chief 2019 EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Charles S. Kelley, ThD Bart Barber, PhD Executive Editor First Baptist Church of Farmersville, Texas Steve W. Lemke, PhD Rex Butler, PhD Editor & BCTM Director New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Adam Harwood, PhD Research Assistant Nathan Finn, PhD Hoyt Denton North Greenville University Book Review Editors Eric Hankins, PhD Archie England, PhD First Baptist Fairhope, Fairhope, Alabama Dennis Phelps, PhD Malcolm Yarnell, PhD Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary The Baptist Center for Theology and Ministry is a research institute of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. The seminary is located at 3939 Gentilly Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70126. BCTM exists to provide theological and ministerial resources to enrich and energize ministry in Baptist churches. Our goal is to bring together professor and practitioner to produce and apply these resources to Baptist life, polity, and ministry. The mission of the BCTM is to develop, preserve, and communicate the distinctive theological identity of Baptists. The Journal for Baptist Theology and Ministry is published semiannually by the Baptist Center for Theology and Ministry. Copyright ©2019 The Baptist Center for Theology and Ministry, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. All Rights Reserved. This peridiocal is indexed in the ATLA Religion Database® (ATLA RDB®), http://www.atla.com. CONTACT BCTM (800) 662-8701, ext. 8074 [email protected] www.baptistcenter.com SUBMISSIONS Visit the Baptist Center website for submission guidelines. TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Introduction 1 Adam Harwood The Role, Purpose, and Nature of Women according to Martin Luther 2 Joe Early Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of Church Planting in Mission: Towards a Theological Framework
    ERT (2009) 33:4, 316-331 The Place of Church Planting in Mission: Towards a Theological Framework Richard Yates Hibbert KEYWORDS: Church planting; Missio points out, ‘theological reflection is the Dei; Kingdom of God; Holistic beginning point of ministry formation’.2 Mission; Theology of Mission While insights from the history of mis- sion and the social sciences are extremely helpful in shaping church I The Need for a Theological planting practice, a biblical and theo- Framework logical foundation is essential if church Until 1980, there were very few books planting is to fulfil God’s purposes for giving practical guidance to church it. Robinson and Christine are right in planters. The succeeding years have insisting that ‘we need to be sure that the activity of church planting lies not seen this vital need met through the just on the practical agenda of activists publication of scores of texts. Very few but that it also belongs to the purpose of these texts, though, provide any- and call of God for his church’.3 Murray thing approaching a satisfying theolog- warns: ical basis for church planting, one notable exception being Stuart Mur- An inadequate theological basis ray’s Church Planting: Laying Founda- [for church planting] will not nec- tions, first published in 1998.1 The biblical and theological founda- 2 Gailyn Van Rheenen, ‘The Missional Helix: tion for the planting of churches has Example of Church Planting’, Monthly Missio- generally been assumed rather than logical Reflections 26 (January 2001), explicitly articulated. As Van Rheenen http://www.missiology.org/mmr/mmr26.htm (accessed 21 May 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Amos Yong Complete Curriculum Vitae
    Y o n g C V | 1 AMOS YONG COMPLETE CURRICULUM VITAE Table of Contents PERSONAL & PROFESSIONAL DATA ..................................................................................... 2 Education ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Academic & Administrative Positions & Other Employment .................................................................... 3 Visiting Professorships & Fellowships ....................................................................................................... 3 Memberships & Certifications ................................................................................................................... 3 PUBLICATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 4 Monographs/Books – and Reviews Thereof.............................................................................................. 4 Edited Volumes – and Reviews Thereof .................................................................................................. 11 Co-edited Book Series .............................................................................................................................. 16 Missiological Engagements: Church, Theology and Culture in Global Contexts (IVP Academic) – with Scott W. Sunquist and John R. Franke ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of a Lay Esprit De Corps: Inspirations, Tensions, Horizons
    Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal Volume 8 Number 2 Article 3 2019 The Emergence of a Lay Esprit de Corps: Inspirations, Tensions, Horizons Christopher Pramuk Regis University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/jhe Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Practical Theology Commons, Religious Education Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons Recommended Citation Pramuk, Christopher (2019) "The Emergence of a Lay Esprit de Corps: Inspirations, Tensions, Horizons," Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal: Vol. 8 : No. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://epublications.regis.edu/jhe/vol8/iss2/3 This Scholarship is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence of a Lay Esprit de Corps: Inspirations, Tensions, Horizons Cover Page Footnote This essay is dedicated in memoriam to Fr. Howard Gray, SJ, whom I never had the good fortune to meet, but whose impact on me and so many in the realm of Jesuit education and Ignatian spirituality continues to be immense. This scholarship is available in Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal: https://epublications.regis.edu/jhe/vol8/iss2/3 Pramuk: The Emergence of a Lay Esprit de Corps The Emergence of a Lay Esprit de Corps: Inspirations, Tensions, Horizons Christopher Pramuk University Chair of Ignatian Thought and Imagination Associate Professor of Theology Regis University [email protected] Abstract Likening the Ignatian tradition as embodied at Jesuit universities to a family photo album with many pages yet to be added, the author locates the “heart” of the Ignatian sensibility in the movements of freedom and spirit (inspiration) in the life of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Mood in Neverver
    Exploring Mood in Neverver Julie Barbour UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO In a preverbal position, all clauses in the Neverver language of Malakula Island (Vanuatu) are either unmarked, or carry the morpheme m- prefixed to the verb. In this paper, I explore the distribution of unmarked and m- marked clauses, examining a number of semantic and grammatical con- texts. I seek to establish whether the choice of using an unmarked clause or an m-marked clause is driven by the temporal location of the situation expressed in the clause, or by the status of that situation in reality. In doing so, I aim to test my earlier analysis of Neverver as being a mood language. The results, however, are divided, with temporal location appearing to be more salient in some contexts, and reality status appearing to be more salient in others. Relying predominantly on evidence from a variety of subordinate clause types, I maintain that Neverver is indeed a mood lan- guage, although an interpretation of the same morphological category as grammatical tense is certainly plausible in some contexts. 1. INTRODUCTION.1 When reading grammars of Oceanic languages, two terms that are commonly encountered in the description of verbal morphology are “realis mood” and “irrealis mood.”2 In Lynch, Ross, and Crowley’s (2002) survey of the Oceanic languages, half of the forty-two languages surveyed name a realis mood morpheme, an irrealis mood morpheme, or a contrast between realis and irrealis mood in verb phrase morphology. Synchronic analyses of several languages of Malakula (Vanuatu) identify “mood” as a relevant grammatical category.3 Neverver (Barbour 2009) is included among these languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuller Theological Seminary School of Theology Deansâ•Ž Files
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c88w3m84 No online items Fuller Theological Seminary School of Theology Deans’ Files Finding aid created by Fuller Theological Seminary-David Allan Hubbard Library Archives staff using RecordEXPRESS Fuller Theological Seminary-David Allan Hubbard Library Archives 135 North Oakland Ave. Pasadena, California 91182 (626) 584-5311 [email protected] https://library.fuller.edu/ 2020 Fuller Theological Seminary CFT00136 1 School of Theology Deans’ Files Descriptive Summary Title: Fuller Theological Seminary School of Theology Deans’ Files Dates: 1944- Collection Number: CFT00136 Creator/Collector: Dyrness, William A.Fuller, Daniel P., 1925-Lindsell, Harold, 1913-1998Fuller Theological Seminary Extent: 26 Boxes, 10.83 linear feet Repository: Fuller Theological Seminary-David Allan Hubbard Library Archives Pasadena, California 91182 Abstract: The Fuller Theological Seminary School of Theology Deans’ Files, 1944- consists of the office files of Fuller Seminary Dean’s Office (1947-1965) and the Dean’s Office of the School of Theology (1965-Present). The “Dean Files” from 1947-1965 contains papers related to the general operation of the overall Seminary and its programs. Reflecting the the 1965 transition of the original “Dean’s Office” into the Dean’s Office of the School of Theology, the collection’s contents focus on the School of Theology administration. Materials include the records of Harold Lindsell (1952 to 1963), Daniel Payton Fuller (1963 to 1973), and William Dyrness (1990-2000). Harold Lindsell's files include Library records kept by the faculty library committee, 1948-1965. Of particular interest—the collection includes Fuller Seminary’s contracts for the Veterans Administration and the Seminary’s Articles of Incorporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Shǐxīng, a Sino-Tibetan Language
    Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Volume 32.1 — April 2009 , A SINO-TIBETAN LANGUAGE OF SOUTH-WEST CHINA: SHǏXĪNG ∗ A GRAMMATICAL SKETCH WITH TWO APPENDED TEXTS Katia Chirkova Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale, CNRS Abstract: This article is a brief grammatical sketch of Shǐxīng, accompanied by two analyzed and annotated texts. Shǐxīng is a little studied Sino-Tibetan language of South-West China, currently classified as belonging to the Qiangic subgroup of the Sino-Tibetan language family. Based on newly collected data, this grammatical sketch is deemed as an enlarged and elaborated version of Huáng & Rénzēng’s (1991) outline of Shǐxīng, with an aim to put forward a new description of Shǐxīng in a language that makes it accessible also to a non-Chinese speaking audience. Keywords: Shǐxīng; Qiangic; Mùlǐ 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Location, name, people The Shǐxīng 史兴语 language is spoken by approximately 1,800 people who reside along the banks of the Shuǐluò 水洛 river in Shuǐluò Township of Mùlǐ Tibetan Autonomous County (WT smi li rang skyong rdzong). This county is part of Liángshān Yí Autonomous Prefecture in Sìchuān Province in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Shuǐluò Township, where the Shǐxīng language is spoken, is situated in the western part of Mùlǐ (WT, variously, smi li, rmi li, mu li or mu le). Mùlǐ is a mountainous and forested region of 13,246.38 m2 at an average altitude of 3,000 meters above sea level. Before the establishment of the PRC in 1949, Mùlǐ was a semi-independent theocratic kingdom, ruled by hereditary lama kings.
    [Show full text]