Prehistoric Britain • Year 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prehistoric Britain • Year 3 PREHISTORIC BRITAIN REACH OUT YEAR 3 name: class: Knowledge Organiser • Prehistoric Britain • Year 3 Map of Europe during the Ice Age Map of Northern Europe today Prehistoric Animals Vocabulary Homo sapiens The scientific name for humans. The Ice Age A very long period when the earth was extremely cold. Woolly Woolly Elk Palaeolithic The early stone age. Humans Mammoth Rhinoceros Era used very basic tools. (Extinct) (Extinct) (Extant) Mesolithic Era The middle stone age. Humans perfected their tools. Neolithic Era The new stone age. Humans Stone Age Tools began farming. Neanderthals Another type of human. They are now extinct. Extinct Animals that used to be alive but now they are all dead. Torc A piece of bronze jewellery. Bronze The first metal humans used. Iron A metal that is harder and Hand axe Hammer stone Spear stronger than Bronze. 2 Lesson Question You will learn Learning Review How do we know • The age of the Earth and when life about life in the began. Stone Age? • How scientists learn about this period. • How people travelled across the world. Which animals lived • Some of the creatures that were alive during the Ice Age? during the Ice Age. • The difference between extant and extinct. What were the • The three different Stone Ages. different periods in • How life developed through those the Stone Age? periods. What was life like • What a nomadic life-style was life. in a Stone Age • The impact on people of building settlement? permanent homes. How did the Bronze • How bronze is made. Age change how • The case study of the Beaker People. humans lived? Who were the Celts, • Why the Celts used iron. and what was life • What impact iron had on the lives of the like for them? Celts. 3 Lesson 01 How do we know about life in the Stone Age? 1. How long ago was the Stone Age? Term Definition Evolve When an animal or plant changes gradually over time, allowing it to survive in its environment. Prehistory The period of history before people wrote anything down, because writing had not yet been invented. Archaeologist A person who studies the past by looking carefully at objects from a very long time ago which have been buried. Palaeontologist A person who studies the past by looking carefully at fossils Timeline A line showing when different events took place, to help us see what came first and what came later. Artefacts Any object made by a human, which can help us learn about the past. Life on Earth Planet Earth is over four and a half billion years old (that’s 4,500,000,000 years ago). After about a billion years, life appeared on earth. The first living things were tiny microbes deep in the ocean. Then, over billions of years, larger, more complex plants and creatures evolved. Most animals began to appear suddenly about 540 million years ago, in an event called the Cambrian Explosion. Dinosaurs roamed for millions of years, until they became extinct about 65 million years ago. After this, mammals could safely live and spread across the earth. 4 • Lesson 1 2. Watch the video about life on earth with your partner. Put these different events in order on the timeline. Extension: draw a picture of each event. • The • Cambrian • Dinosaurs • Simple life and • Microbes, dinosaurs Explosion: lots become plants slowly the first life, rule the of different extinct and evolve in the appears on earth. animals and the age of oceans. Microbes, earth. plants appear. the mammals the first life, begins. appears on earth. 3.5 billion years ago 3.5 billion years ago to 600 million years ago 600 million years ago 250 million years ago to 65 million years ago 65 million years ago Humans didn’t suddenly appear on earth. They began to evolve from apes over millions of years. The earliest humans looked more like apes than humans. However, they began to evolve to have larger brains, to walk upright, and have better control with their hands. There were lots of different species of humans, but only one type survived to today. Us. Our species is called homo sapiens, and we first evolved about 300,000 years ago. Lesson 1 • 5 3. Look at these different types of humans. How have humans changed over time? Homo Homo habilis Homo erectus Homo Homo sapiens Australopithecus heidelbergensis 4 million years 2.8 million years 1.9 million years 0.6 million years 0.3 million ago ago ago ago years ago Different scientists have helped us to learn more about early humans. • Palaeontologists study fossils: special rocks which show the imprint of skeletons and plants. • Archaeologists study artefacts that were made by humans and have been buried. These scientists find clues from the past. These clues tell us where humans were at different times, and how they might have This is a fossil of a seymouria, one of the behaved. Using these clues, it is thought earliest creatures to leave the sea and live that about 150,000 years ago, homo on land. It is about 280 million years old. sapiens began to travel out of Africa and into the middle east and then Europe. 4. What is the name of a scientist who studies fossils? • Archaeologist • Palaeontologist. 6 • Lesson 1 5. Point to the different continents on the map: Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, Australasia This map shows when different species of humans left Africa and began to live in different parts of the world. The numbers show how many years ago the humans travelled. 6. Complete these sentences using information from throughout the lesson. Homo sapiens left east Africa and travelled _______________________________________. There were different human species living 200,000 years ago, including homo sapiens, _____________________ and ___________________. About 70,000 years ago, homo erectus made it to _______________________________. Homo sapiens first arrived in Britain around ___________________________ years ago. Around 50,000 years ago, humans first arrived in _______________________. Lesson 1 • 7 Lesson 02 Which animals lived during the Ice Age? Retrieval Practice 1. Name one type of early human species: homo _____________________________ 2. What was the name of the event when lots and lots of animals suddenly appeared on earth? a. The Cambrian Explosion b The Mesolithic Era c. Homo sapiens 3. What is the name of a scientist who studies artefacts made by humans which have been buried under ground? a. Palaeontologists b. Archaeologists c. Artefactorists d. Cambrianologists 4. Which continent to scientists think humans first evolved from. a. Europe b. Asia c. North America d. Africa 5. What is the name of a special rock which has the imprint of a skeleton in in? a. Artefact b. Seymouria c. Fossil d. Microbe 8 • Lesson 2 Term Definition Ice Age The long period of time when the earth was much colder, and covered in huge sheets of ice. Glaciers Another name for huge sheets of ice. Extinct When there are no more of a species left. They have all died out. Extant When a species still exists and is alive today. Ivory The horns or tusks of animals, including elephants and rhinos. A frozen planet These glaciers covered most of Britain, For most of the stone age, the world Europe, parts of North America, South looked very different to how it is today. America and Australia, as well as other Early humans were living in an Ice Age. The places. The most recent ice age began world was much colder than it is now. There about 1.5 million years ago and ended were huge sheets of ice, called glaciers, about 15,000 years ago. covering lots of land. 1.Watch the video, and then draw the ice sheets on this map of the world. Lesson 2 • 9 During this ice age, there were some This creature was a member of the elephant incredible beasts which roamed the earth. family. It was larger than elephants today, These animals had adapted to the cold and was covered in fur. Woolly mammoths conditions, and some lived in Britain. Some went extinct about 4,000 years ago. of these animals, like elk, are extant, which Scientists have found frozen bodies of means that they are still alive today. Other woolly mammoths. species went extinct, which means that there are none of them left alive today. It 3. Scientists think that they might be wasn’t only animals that went extinct. All of able to breed new woolly the kinds of humans except for our species, mammoths by taking their DNA homo sapiens, were extinct by the end of and putting it into a modern the ice age. Scientists disagree about what elephant. Do you think that they caused this. should do this? 2. What could cause a species to Humans had to work together to hunt go extinct? Give as many woolly mammoths, it would have been reasons as you can think of. very dangerous. They used spears, and perhaps bows and arrows. Humans would _____________________________________ need to make a plan and communicate _____________________________________ instructions, something other animals _____________________________________ couldn’t do. _____________________________________ If a woolly mammoth was killed, humans would be able to use the ivory tusks for tools, the skin for clothes, and have plenty There were many animals living in Britain of fat and meat to eat. However, one during the ice age which are now extinct. wrong move and the mammoth would easily kill a human with a swipe of its tusks. Woolly Mammoth 4. Would hunting a woolly mammoth have been worth the risk? Why/why not? Advantages Disdvantages 10 • Lesson 2 5.
Recommended publications
  • Dinner in a Dinosaur
    Benchmarks DECEMBER 31, 1853: DINNER IN A DINOSAUR he weather in London on Saturday, Dec. 31, 1853, could On New Year’s Eve, 1853, Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins hosted not have pleased Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins. a formal dinner in the mold of an Iguanodon. After a relatively warm Friday, the temperature had plummeted, snow had begun to fall, and for the first to celebrate the “triumphs of industry and art,” and hired Ttime in more than a decade, masses of ice floated down the Hawkins to direct the “Fossil Department.” They tasked him Thames River. The snow made the streets so slippery that with populating a vast geologic display with giant monsters injured pedestrians filled the hospitals. of the ancient world, including the first three dinosaurs ever For New Year’s Eve, Hawkins was hosting an elaborate feast described: Megalosaurus, Iguanodon and Hylaeosaurus. at his sculpting studio in Sydenham, 11 kilometers south of Hawkins was uniquely qualified to bring these great ani- London. Would his guests be able to find transportation out to mals to life. He had initially achieved fame for his detailed Sydenham and then across the pastures of muddy swamp that illustrations of animals collected by British explorers, includ- surrounded the wooden building where the dinner would be ing the still relatively obscure naturalist Charles Darwin. held? Hawkins hoped so; he had been planning the meal for Subsequently, Hawkins started to sculpt, and to write and more than a month. It would be the first time that most of his illustrate books on animal anatomy. For his efforts in taking dinner-mates had seen the incredible life-sized dinosaurs that new scientific findings and translating them into words and he was building for the Crystal Palace Exhibition, which Queen images accessible to the general public, Hawkins earned Victoria and Prince Albert would open to the public in June.
    [Show full text]
  • Homes for Hunters? Exploring the Concept of Home at Hunter-Gatherer Sites in Upper Paleolithic Europe and Epipaleolithic Southwest Asia
    Current Anthropology Volume 60, Number 1, February 2019 91 Homes for Hunters? Exploring the Concept of Home at Hunter-Gatherer Sites in Upper Paleolithic Europe and Epipaleolithic Southwest Asia by Lisa A. Maher and Margaret Conkey In both Southwest Asia and Europe, only a handful of known Upper Paleolithic and Epipaleolithic sites attest to aggregation or gatherings of hunter-gatherer groups, sometimes including evidence of hut structures and highly structured use of space. Interpretation of these structures ranges greatly, from mere ephemeral shelters to places “built” into a landscape with meanings beyond refuge from the elements. One might argue that this ambiguity stems from a largely functional interpretation of shelters that is embodied in the very terminology we use to describe them in comparison to the homes of later farming communities: mobile hunter-gatherers build and occupy huts that can form campsites, whereas sedentary farmers occupy houses or homes that form communities. Here we examine some of the evidence for Upper Paleolithic and Epipaleolithic structures in Europe and Southwest Asia, offering insights into their complex “functions” and examining perceptions of space among hunter-gatherer communities. We do this through examination of two contemporary, yet geographically and culturally distinct, examples: Upper Paleolithic (especially Magdalenian) evidence in Western Europe and the Epipaleolithic record (especially Early and Middle phases) in Southwest Asia. A comparison of recent evidence for hut structures from these regions suggests several similarities in the nature of these structures, their association with activities related to hunter-gatherer aggregation, and their being “homes” imbued with quotidian and symbolic meaning. All of this is my home temporary, yet geographically and culturally distinct, exam- these fjords rivers lakes ples: the EP record (especially Early and Middle phases) in the cold the sunlight the storms Southwest Asia and the UP (especially Magdalenian) evidence The night and day of the fields in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaloceros Giganteus) from the Pleistocene in Poland
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Healed antler fracture from a giant deer (Megaloceros giganteus) from the Pleistocene in Poland Kamilla Pawłowska, Krzysztof Stefaniak, and Dariusz Nowakowski ABSTRACT We evaluated the skull of an ancient giant deer with a deformity of one antler. The skull was found in the 1930s in the San River near Barycz, in southeastern Poland. Its dating (39,800±1000 yr BP) corresponds to MIS-3, when the giant deer was wide- spread in Europe. Our diagnostics for the antler included gross morphology, radiogra- phy, computed tomography, and histopathology. We noted signs of fracture healing of the affected antler, including disordered arrangement of lamellae, absence of osteons, and numerous Volkmann’s canals remaining after blood vessel loss. The antler defor- mity appears to be of traumatic origin, with a healing component. No similar evaluation process has been described previously for this species. Kamilla Pawłowska. corresponding author, Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Maków Polnych 16, Poznań 61-606, Poland, [email protected] Krzysztof Stefaniak. Division of Palaeozoology, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza 21, Wrocław 50-335, Poland, [email protected] Dariusz Nowakowski. Department of Anthropology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kożuchowska 6/7, Wrocław 51-631, Poland, [email protected] Keywords: giant deer; Megaloceros giganteus; paleopathology; Pleistocene; Poland INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Report
    RESEARCH DEPARTMENT REPORT SERIES no. 29-2011 ISSN 1749-8775 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES REPORT Dale Serjeantson ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Department Report Series 29-2011 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) Dale Serjeantson © English Heritage ISSN 1749-8775 The Research Department Report Series, incorporates reports from all the specialist teams within the English Heritage Research Department: Archaeological Science; Archaeological Archives; Historic Interiors Research and Conservation; Archaeological Projects; Aerial Survey and Investigation; Archaeological Survey and Investigation; Architectural Investigation; Imaging, Graphics and Survey; and the Survey of London. It replaces the former Centre for Archaeology Reports Series, the Archaeological Investigation Report Series, and the Architectural Investigation Report Series. Many of these are interim reports which make available the results of specialist investigations in advance of full publication. They are not usually subject to external refereeing, and their conclusions may sometimes have to be modified in the light of information not available at the time of the investigation. Where no final project report is available, readers are advised to consult the author before citing these reports in any publication. Opinions expressed in Research Department Reports are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of English Heritage. Requests for further hard copies, after the initial print run, can be made by emailing: [email protected]. or by writing to English Heritage, Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Road, Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD Please note that a charge will be made to cover printing and postage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Britain's First Modern Humans
    The archaeology of Britain’s first modern humans Rob Dinnis∗ The sites of the first modern humans Research who occupied what is now Britain have been reduced to a handful by subsequent glaciation and the rise in sea level, and their assemblages have been further depleted because early excavators ignored the microliths. Confronting the challenges of this exiguous material, the author succeeds in painting a vivid picture of Aurignacian hunters following prey down the now submerged Channel River Valley, colonising the preferred hilly zones at the west of Britain. The presence of two types of bladelet manufacture suggests a lengthy or repeated period of subsequent occupation. Keywords: Britain, Europe, Upper Palaeolithic, Aurignacian, Paviland burin, burin busqu´e Introduction: the Aurignacian Indigenous European Neanderthals were replaced by incoming modern humans about 40– 35 000 BP. Although the intricacies of this event continue to be debated, there is broad consensus that the Aurignacian culture (c. 38–30 000 BP) was created by the first modern humans to successfully occupy the entire continent (e.g. Kozłowski & Otte 2000; Davies 2001; Zilhao˜ & d’Errico 2003; Conard 2006; Zilhao˜ 2006; Mellars et al. 2007; Joris¨ & Street 2008; Bailey et al. 2009). European Aurignacian assemblages are found from Russia in the east, to Britain, France and Iberia in the west. These assemblages contain conspicuous evidence for many capabilities and behaviours associated with extant humans, including complex language, music and symbolic material culture (e.g. Vanhaeren & d’Errico 2006; Conard 2009; Conard et al. 2009). The last decade has seen significant advances in our understanding of the Middle–Upper Palaeolithic transition (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • New Record of Terminal Pleistocene Elk/Wapiti (Cervus Canadensis) from Ohio, USA
    2 TERMINAL PLEISTOCENE ELK FROM OHIO VOL. 121(2) New Record of Terminal Pleistocene Elk/Wapiti (Cervus canadensis) from Ohio, USA BRIAN G. REDMOND1, Department of Archaeology, Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, OH, USA; DAVID L. DYER, Ohio History Connection, Columbus, OH, USA; and CHARLES STEPHENS, Sugar Creek Chapter, Archaeological Society of Ohio, Massillon, OH, USA. ABSTRACT. The earliest appearance of elk/wapiti (Cervus canadensis) in eastern North America is not thoroughly documented due to the small number of directly dated remains. Until recently, no absolute dates on elk bone older than 10,000 14C yr BP (11,621 to 11,306 calibrated years (cal yr) BP) were known from this region. The partial skeleton of the Tope Elk was discovered in 2017 during commercial excavation of peat deposits from a small bog in southeastern Medina County, Ohio, United States. Subsequent examination of the remains revealed the individual to be a robust male approximately 8.5 years old at death. The large size of this individual is compared with late Holocene specimens and suggests diminution of elk since the late Pleistocene. Two accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon assays on bone collagen samples taken from the scapula and metacarpal of this individual returned ages of 10,270 ± 30 14C yr BP (Beta-477478) (12,154 to 11,835 cal yr BP) and 10,260 ± 30 14C yr BP (Beta-521748) (12,144 to 11,830 cal yr BP), respectively. These results place Cervus canadensis in the terminal Pleistocene of the eastern woodlands and near the establishment of the mixed deciduous forest biome over much of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • How the 'Seven Deadly Agents Of
    Paper presented at the How the ‘Seven Deadly Agents of Destruction’ conference can help preserve the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs Liesa Brierley, Ellinor Michel, Anthony Lewis, Chris Aldhous and Lois Olmstead Introduction Compared to collections kept safe inside museums, outdoor sculpture is affected by additional risk factors. Sculpture in the public realm is exposed to the elements, pollution and direct sunshine. It is more vulnerable to vandalism and the proximity to nature can also take its toll. At the same time, the condition of outdoor sculpture is often not monitored as rigorously as that of museum collections. However, damage doesn’t go unnoticed by the public and, channelled in the right way, the public’s critical eye can be turned to positive pressure, increasing support for conservation work and helping to improve conditions for the displays. To conservation professionals, the Canadian Conservation Institute’s framework of Ten Agents of Deterioration is a familiar and well-established way of describing risk factors to cultural heritage. This paper describes an attempt to translate this framework into a short animated film about risks to outdoor sculpture, using the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs, a renowned Victorian sculpture park in south London, as the stage for the message. The film is aimed at a broad audience of non-professionals of all ages and it is hoped that it will deliver an increased sense of both understanding and ownership of the sculpture park. The Crystal Palace Dinosaurs The Crystal Palace Dinosaurs are the first life-sized sculptural reconstructions of extinct animals, built to engage and enlighten the public on the paradigm- shifting advances in science in the mid-19th century (Owen 1854, McCarthy and Gilbert 1994, Pigott 2004, Bramwell and Peck 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Late Quaternary Megafaunal Extinctions in Europe and Northern Asia
    Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg | 259 | 287 – 297 | 2 Figs | Frankfurt a. M., 13. 12. 2007 Patterns of Late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions in Europe and northern Asia With 2 figs Anthony J. STUART & Adrian M. LISTER A b s t r a c t This paper summarizes the results so far of our ‘Late Quaternary Megafaunal Extinctions’ project, focussing on an assessment of latest available dates for selected target species from Europe and northern Asia. Our approach is to directly radiocarbon-date material of extinct megafauna to construct their spatio-temporal histories, and to seek correlations with the environmental and archaeological records with the aim of estab- lishing the cause or causes of extinction. So far we have focussed on Mammuthus primigenius, Coelodonta antiquitatis, and Megaloceros giganteus, and are accumulating data on Panthera leo/spelaea, Crocuta crocuta and Ursus spelaeus. Attempts to date Palaeoloxodon antiquus and Stephanorhinus hemitoechus (from southern Europe) were largely unsuccessful. The pattern of inferred terminal dates is staggered, with extinctions occurring over ca. 30 millennia, with some species previously thought extinct in the Late Pleistocene – M. primigenius and M. giganteus – surviving well into the Holocene. All species show dramatic range shifts in response to climatic/vegeta- tional changes, especially the beginning of the Last Glacial Maximum, Late Glacial Interstadial, Allerød, Younger Dryas and Holocene, and there was a general trend of progressive range reduction and fragmenta- tion prior to final extinction. With the possible exceptions of P. antiquus, S. hemitoechus and Homo nean- derthalensis, extinctions do not correlate with the appearance of modern humans. However, although most of the observed patterns can be attributed to environmental changes, some features – especially failures to recolonize – suggest human involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Age Essex a Teacher's Guide
    Stone Age Essex A Teacher’s Guide Colchester and Ipswich Museums 1 Table of contents Overview of Stone Age Essex 3 Stone Age Timeline 7 Stone Age Glossary 8 Recommended Resources 9 Recommended Additional Learning 10 Stone Age Objects 11 Activity Examples 15 2 Overview of Stone Age Essex The Stone Age had three distinct periods: the Palaeolithic (Old Stone Age), the Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age) and the Neolithic (New Stone Age). The people from each of these periods had different levels of technology and methods of survival. Palaeolithic The Palaeolithic began in Britain around 800,000 years ago when early humans, including Homo antecessor and Homo neanderthalensis, crossed the land bridge that connected Britain to mainland Europe. The cold temperatures of the last Ice Age had left most of Britain covered in ice and snow, rendering it uninhabitable. Interglacial periods, when the ice sheet retreated and the temperature warmed, allowed early humans to cross the land bridge and take advantage of the rich flora and fauna in Britain. Palaeolithic people who crossed the land bridge into Britain were hunter-gatherers. They developed tools made of stone to exploit the environment around them. Evidence of butchery on animal bones shows that they used these tools to hunt species including mammoth, red deer, hare and antelope. PALEOLITHIC SITES (Essex and Suffolk) Marks Tey Why is Marks Tey important? In the last Ice Age, most of Britain was covered by an ice sheet. The area that is now Marks Tey lay at the easternmost edge of the ice sheet. This was the edge of the habitable world for both humans and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Burial and Identity in the Late Neolithic And
    Burial and identity in the Late Neolithic and Copper Age of south-east Europe Susan Stratton Thesis submitted in candidature for the degree of PhD Cardiff University March 2016 CONTENTS List of figures…………………………………………………………………………7 List of tables………………………………………………………………………….14 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 16 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 17 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 18 2 Archaeological study of mortuary practice ........................................................................... 22 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Culture history ................................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Status and hierarchy – the processualist preoccupations ............................................ 26 2.4 Post-processualists and messy human relationships .................................................... 36 2.5 Feminism and the emergence of gender archaeology .................................................. 43 2.6 Personhood, identity and memory ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Mammals Classifying Mammals
    Outline 20: Evolution of Mammals Classifying Mammals • Paleontologists recognize at least 5 major groups of mammals. Only 3 are still living: –Monotremes: lay eggs –Marsupials: poorly developed at birth –Eutherians or Placentals: well developed at birth 5 Major Groups: 3 Living Defining Mammals • Warm blooded • Fur • Milk glands • Can lay eggs or have some form of live birth. Recognizing Fossil Mammals • Our definition of mammals doesn’t work with fossil bones. • How do we recognize the first mammals? –Reptiles have 3 bones in lower jaw. –Mammals have 1 bone in lower jaw –Mammal teeth are specialized. Dinosaurs have 3 bones in lower jaw 2 3 1 Mammals have 1 bone in lower jaw Hadrocodium, a lower Jurassic mammal with a “large” brain (6 mm brain case in an 8 mm skull) Eomaia, oldest placental mammal, 125 my old, Lower Cretaceous, China Eomaia, oldest placental mammal, 125 my old, Lower Cretaceous, China Eomaia Mammal fossil from the Cretaceous of Mongolia Jaw bones • Reptiles have 3 bones in their jaw: dentary, articular, and quadrate. • Articular and quadrate bones of reptile jaw became the hammer and anvil bones of the mammalian inner ear. • Marsupials are born with a reptilian jaw, which quickly changes before they eat solid food. = articular of = quadrate of Human Ear Bones, or lower reptile upper reptile Auditory Ossicles jaw jaw Cochlea Mammal Teeth • Teeth make excellent fossils. • Reptile ancestors had simple, cone- shaped teeth they regularly replaced. • Mammal teeth are specialized into incisors, canines, pre-molars and molars. • Mammals have only two sets of teeth during their lifetime. A Nile crocodile.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Britain
    Prehistoric Britain Plated disc brooch Kent, England Late 6th or early 7th century AD Bronze boars from the Hounslow Hoard 1st century BC-1st century AD Hounslow, Middlesex, England Visit resource for teachers Key Stage 2 Prehistoric Britain Contents Before your visit Background information Resources Gallery information Preliminary activities During your visit Gallery activities: introduction for teachers Gallery activities: briefings for adult helpers Gallery activity: Neolithic mystery objects Gallery activity: Looking good in the Neolithic Gallery activity: Neolithic farmers Gallery activity: Bronze Age pot Gallery activity: Iron Age design Gallery activity: An Iron Age hoard After your visit Follow-up activities Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Background information Prehistoric Britain Archaeologists and historians use the term ‘Prehistory’ to refer to a time in a people’s history before they used a written language. In Britain the term Prehistory refers to the period before Britain became part of the Roman empire in AD 43. The prehistoric period in Britain lasted for hundreds of thousands of years and this long period of time is usually divided into: Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic (sometimes these three periods are combined and called the Stone Age), Bronze Age and Iron Age. Each of these periods might also be sub-divided into early, middle and late. The Palaeolithic is often divided into lower, middle and upper. Early Britain British Isles: Humans probably first arrived in Britain around 800,000 BC. These early inhabitants had to cope with extreme environmental changes and they left Britain at least seven times when conditions became too bad.
    [Show full text]