DOCSLIB.ORG

2 Phillips/Bradley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 134 (2004), 17–51 PHILIPS & BRADLEY: DEVELOPER-FUNDED FIELDWORK | 17 Developer-funded fieldwork in Scotland, 1990–2003: an overview of the prehistoric evidence Tim Phillips* & Richard Bradley* ABSTRACT The paper is in two parts. The first presents a digest of the prehistoric evidence recovered by developer-funded archaeology between 1990 and 2003 and compares it with the results of projects funded by Historic Scotland. The second reflects on the wider significance of this material in relation to past and present research on Scottish prehistory and its implications for the archaeology of Britain and Ireland. PART ONE independent commercial archaeological units have conducted this fieldwork. There have also Tim Phillips been several hundred field surveys undertaken The National Planning Policy Guideline for in advance of afforestation and linear schemes Archaeology and Planning (NPPG5) states: such as road building and pipelines. The Scottish archaeological units have an The primary policy objectives are that they enviable record of publication of their most [archaeological remains] should be preserved important excavations, but the full extent and wherever feasible and that, where this proves not content of this work has never been quantified. to be possible, procedures should be in place to ensure proper recording before destruction, and Because of the requirements of planning subsequent analysis and publication. (Scottish legislation, destruction or damage to the known Office 1994, para 4) body of standing monuments is limited. This report aims to provide an overview of the This document goes on to advise that the planning prehistoric evidence revealed by this work and authorities should, ‘ensure, where appropriate, to consider it in relation to the results of more that the prospective developer arranges for an ‘traditional’ archaeology. archaeological assessment and, if necessary, It is possible to conduct such a survey because a field evaluation’ (para 25). These guidelines of two requirements of the Scottish system. A have ensured that archaeology has become part copy of the report detailing any fieldwork is sent of the planning process, with the developer to the National Monuments Record for Scotland being responsible for funding any necessary (NMRS), part of the Royal Commission on the work. This has been the case for nearly 15 years Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland and has resulted in a large number of watching (RCAHMS), based in Edinburgh, and held in briefs, evaluations and excavations across their library. At a practical level, this means that Scotland. Indeed, the number of contract field all the material can be consulted in one place. projects increased more than threefold between A summary, sometimes with site photographs 1990 and 2000 (Carter 2002, 870). Generally, and plans, is almost always published in an * Dept of Archaeology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AB 18 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2004 annual report of all the fieldwork carried out This information was entered into a database in a particular year, Discovery and Excavation consisting of two ‘tables’. The first records all in Scotland (DES). This is published within a the development-related fieldwork conducted few months of the project taking place. This between 1990 and 2003, as listed in DES. can be compared to the unsatisfactory situation All these projects have been funded, or part- in England where there is no central repository funded, by commercial developers. They also for the reports. They are held by the local and include major road schemes funded by the regional Sites and Monuments Records and Scottish Office/Executive Roads Directorate Urban Archaeological Databases in nearly 100 but managed through Historic Scotland, and locations spread across the country (Bradley development work funded by local authorities. & Phillips, forthcoming). Annual summaries The projects are listed as ‘prehistoric’, ‘Roman’, ad are published in some counties and regions, ‘medieval’, ‘post-medieval’ (up to 1800), but there is no national published report apart or ‘negative’ for projects where no evidence from a retrospective list: Gazetteer of Archaeo- was found from any of these phases. This logical Investigations in England (BIAB database can be used as a reference tool for 1997–2003). This contains a very brief summary investigators researching other archaeological of the fieldwork and lacks explanatory site plans periods apart from prehistory. The second table contains more detailed information about the and photographs. Full academic publication in prehistoric evidence. Further information is parts of England is also limited or non-existent. given in four fields detailing the prehistoric period (Mesolithic, Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age, or ‘Prehistoric’ where the exact dating is METHODOLOGY uncertain), a description of the features found, the artefacts recovered and any additional notes. Firstly, the NMRS in Edinburgh was visited by This database is now held by Historic Scotland. Tim Phillips in 2003 as part of Richard Bradley’s AHRB-funded project on British and Irish prehistory. All the reports in its holdings were RESULTS consulted. Any parts that contained evidence of prehistoric activity were photocopied, includ- The results of this review are summarized in ing site plans. Secondly, each volume of DES Table 1. The bulk of the fieldwork consisted between 1990 and 2003 was consulted, which of watching briefs and evaluations, followed identified work and some projects that were by field surveys and excavations. This reflects not represented amongst the reports held in the planning process, where limited exploratory Edinburgh. All developer-related fieldwork work only leads to full-scale excavation if was highlighted, and the archaeological periods particularly important remains appear to be represented in each project. This information present. Very few excavations have produced was checked against unpublished data supplied entirely negative results. Relatively less by Historic Scotland. The fieldwork projects archaeological evidence has been revealed included in the sample were all developer- by the watching briefs and evaluations, yet funded watching briefs, evaluations, excavations this work is important in defining areas with and field surveys. Desk-based assessments were little archaeological material. The amount of not included. The field surveys carried out by the prehistoric evidence compares well with the commercial units relate mainly to afforestation, evidence from the medieval period. Indeed, and linear projects. These were among the prehistory is well represented amongst the material collected. targeted excavations, giving the highest number PHILIPS & BRADLEY: DEVELOPER-FUNDED FIELDWORK | 19 in the sample. The amount of evidence that is parts of the Firth of Forth (illus 2). Some of these recognizably ‘Roman’ is very low. Many sites relate to afforestation in what are marginal areas occupied during the earlier first millennium ad today. Thus, they are in different zones from the may be without recognizable ‘Roman’ artefacts. main areas of development that have involved The highest values are represented by the post- excavation. To some extent this complements medieval evidence. the work represented by illus 1, but the actual The location of fieldwork projects involving methodology is different, for the field surveys actual intervention (watching briefs, evaluations reveal signs of past human activity that are and excavations) shows a distinctive pattern visible on the surface. The major gaps in this (illus 1). The major cities and towns of work are in the south-eastern Scottish Borders, Scotland are plainly visible, as is the line Fife, Angus and the north-east. Also under- of the M74 motorway in the south-west. It represented are areas inland from the west coast must be stressed that this is not a distribution of Argyll and Highland, the interior of northern map of archaeological finds but shows where Sutherland and Caithness, and much of Dumfries development has taken place. It should also be & Galloway. In the Northern and Western Isles, noted that a watching brief, an evaluation and, there have been many coastal surveys related to in some cases, a larger excavation may all have the threat of erosion to archaeological features, taken place on the same site, each generating but these have been funded by Historic Scotland a separate event record. Much of the work has rather than developers. This distribution map can been in urban areas, especially watching briefs be compared to the locations of the RCAHMS and evaluations, concentrated through the surveys conducted between 1987 and 2002 central belt from Glasgow to Edinburgh and (Stevenson 2002, fig 3). In southern Scotland the along the southern coast of the Firth of Forth. Royal Commission Surveys have been carried Other concentrations are along the Ayrshire out in large parts of Dumfries & Galloway and coast, through Fife and Angus, and along the in smaller areas of the Scottish Borders Council southern shore of the Moray Firth. The major area. In central and eastern Scotland, large areas gaps are the Northern and Western Isles, the have been surveyed to the south and east of west coast, much of the Highland Council area, Edinburgh, across Perth & Kinross and along the Grampian Mountains, the interior of south- Strathdon. Smaller areas of the north-east and west Scotland and, to a lesser extent, inland Highland have
Recommended publications
  • Conservation of the Wildcat (Felis Silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the Conservation Status and Assessment of Conservation Activities

    Conservation of the Wildcat (Felis Silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the Conservation Status and Assessment of Conservation Activities

    Conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the conservation status and assessment of conservation activities Urs Breitenmoser, Tabea Lanz and Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten February 2019 Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 2 Cover photo: Wildcat (Felis silvestris) male meets domestic cat female, © L. Geslin. In spring 2018, the Scottish Wildcat Conservation Action Plan Steering Group commissioned the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group to review the conservation status of the wildcat in Scotland and the implementation of conservation activities so far. The review was done based on the scientific literature and available reports. The designation of the geographical entities in this report, and the representation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The SWCAP Steering Group contact point is Martin Gaywood ([email protected]). Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 3 List of Content Abbreviations and Acronyms 4 Summary 5 1. Introduction 7 2. History and present status of the wildcat in Scotland – an overview 2.1. History of the wildcat in Great Britain 8 2.2. Present status of the wildcat in Scotland 10 2.3. Threats 13 2.4. Legal status and listing 16 2.5. Characteristics of the Scottish Wildcat 17 2.6. Phylogenetic and taxonomic characteristics 20 3. Recent conservation initiatives and projects 3.1. Conservation planning and initial projects 24 3.2. Scottish Wildcat Action 28 3.3.
  • NEWSLETTER October 2015

    NEWSLETTER October 2015

    NEWSLETTER October 2015 Dates for your diary MAD evenings Tuesdays 7.30 - 9.30 pm at Strathpeffer Community Centre 17th November Northern Picts - Candy Hatherley of Aberdeen University 8th December A pot pourri of NOSAS activity 19th January 2016 Rock Art – Phase 2 John Wombell 16th February 15th March Bobbin Mills - Joanna Gilliat Winter walks Thursday 5th November Pictish Easter Ross with soup and sandwiches in Balintore - David Findlay Friday 4th December Slochd to Sluggan Bridge: military roads and other sites with afternoon tea - Meryl Marshall Saturday 9th January 2016 Roland Spencer-Jones Thursday 4th February Caledonian canal and Craig Phadrig Fort- Bob & Rosemary Jones Saturday 5th March Sat 9th April Brochs around Brora - Anne Coombs Training Sunday 8 November 2 - 4 pm at Tarradale House Pottery identification course (beginners repeated) - Eric Grant 1 Archaeology Scotland Summer School, May 2015 The Archaeology Scotland Summer School for 2015 covered Kilmartin and North Knapdale. The group stayed in Inveraray and included a number of NOSAS members who enjoyed the usual well researched sites and excellent evening talks. The first site was a Neolithic chambered cairn in Crarae Gardens. This cairn was excavated in the 1950s when it was discovered to contain inhumations and cremation burials. The chamber is divided into three sections by two septal slabs with the largest section at the rear. The next site was Arichonan township which overlooks Caol Scotnish, an inlet of Loch Sween, and which was cleared in 1848 though there were still some households listed in the 1851 census. Chambered cairn Marion Ruscoe Later maps indicate some roofed buildings as late as 1898.
  • Program of the 76Th Annual Meeting

    Program of the 76Th Annual Meeting

    PROGRAM OF THE 76 TH ANNUAL MEETING March 30−April 3, 2011 Sacramento, California THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2011 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting 3 Contents 4................ Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5………..….2011 Award Recipients 11.................Maps of the Hyatt Regency Sacramento, Sheraton Grand Sacramento, and the Sacramento Convention Center 17 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 18 ............... General Information . 20. .............. Featured Sessions 22 ............... Summary Schedule 26 ............... A Word about the Sessions 28…………. Student Events 29………..…Sessions At A Glance (NEW!) 37................ Program 169................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 176................ Presidents of SAA . 176................ Annual Meeting Sites 178................ Exhibit Map 179................Exhibitor Directory 190................SAA Committees and Task Forces 194…….…….Index of Participants 4 Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting APRIL 1, 2011 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2010 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
  • Ipas in Scotland • 2

    Ipas in Scotland • 2

    IPAs in Scotland • 2 • 5 • 6 • 3 • 4 • 15 • 10 • 11 • 14 • 16 • 12 • 13 • 9 • 7 • 8 • 17 • 19 • 21 • 26 • 29 • 23 • 25 • 27 31 • • 33 • 18 • 28 • 32 • 24 • 20 • 22 • 30 • 40 • 34 • 39 • 41 • 45 • 35 • 37 • 38 • 44 • 36 • 43 • 42 • 47 • 46 2 Contents Contents • 1 4 Foreword 6 Scotland’s IPAs: facts and figures 12 Protection and management 13 Threats 14 Land use 17 Planning and land use 18 Land management 20 Rebuilding healthy ecosystems 21 Protected areas Code IPA name 22 Better targeting of 1 Shetland 25 Glen Coe and Mamores resources and support 2 Mainland Orkney 26 Ben Nevis and the 24 What’s next for 3 Harris and Lewis Grey Corries Scotland’s IPAs? 4 Ben Mor, Assunt/ 27 Rannoch Moor 26 The last word Ichnadamph 28 Breadalbane Mountains 5 North Coast of Scotland 29 Ben Alder and Cover – Glen Coe 6 Caithness and Sutherland Aonach Beag ©Laurie Campbell Peatlands 30 Crieff Woods 7 Uists 31 Dunkeld-Blairgowrie 8 South West Skye Lochs 9 Strathglass Complex 32 Milton Wood 10 Sgurr Mor 33 Den of Airlie 11 Ben Wyvis 34 Colonsay 12 Black Wood of Rannoch 35 Beinn Bheigier, Islay 13 Moniack Gorge 36 Isle of Arran 14 Rosemarkie to 37 Isle of Cumbrae Shandwick Coast 38 Bankhead Moss, Beith 15 Dornoch Firth and 39 Loch Lomond Woods Morrich More 40 Flanders Moss 16 Culbin Sands and Bar 41 Roslin Glen 17 Cairngorms 42 Clearburn Loch 18 Coll and Tiree 43 Lochs and Mires of the 19 Rum Ale and Ettrick Waters 20 Ardmeanach 44 South East Scotland 21 Eigg Basalt Outcrops 22 Mull Oakwoods 45 River Tweed 23 West Coast of Scotland 46 Carsegowan Moss 24 Isle of Lismore 47 Merrick Kells Citation Author Plantlife (2015) Dr Deborah Long with editorial Scotland’s Important comment from Ben McCarthy.
  • The Case for a Marine Act for Scotland the Tangle of the Forth

    The Case for a Marine Act for Scotland the Tangle of the Forth

    The Case for a Marine Act for Scotland The Tangle of the Forth © WWF Scotland For more information contact: WWF Scotland Little Dunkeld Dunkeld Perthshire PH8 0AD t: 01350 728200 f: 01350 728201 The Case for a Marine Act for Scotland wwf.org.uk/scotland COTLAND’S incredibly Scotland’s territorial rich marine environment is waters cover 53 per cent of Designed by Ian Kirkwood Design S one of the most diverse in its total terrestrial and marine www.ik-design.co.uk Europe supporting an array of wildlife surface area Printed by Woods of Perth and habitats, many of international on recycled paper importance, some unique to Scottish Scotland’s marine and WWF-UK registered charity number 1081274 waters. Playing host to over twenty estuarine environment A company limited by guarantee species of whales and dolphins, contributes £4 billion to number 4016274 the world’s second largest fish - the Scotland’s £64 billion GDP Panda symbol © 1986 WWF – basking shark, the largest gannet World Wide Fund for Nature colony in the world and internationally 5.5 million passengers and (formerly World Wildlife Fund) ® WWF registered trademark important numbers of seabirds and seals 90 million tonnes of freight Scotland’s seas also contain amazing pass through Scottish ports deepwater coral reefs, anemones and starfish. The rugged coastline is 70 per cent of Scotland’s characterised by uniquely varied habitats population of 5 million live including steep shelving sea cliffs, sandy within 0km of the coast and beaches and majestic sea lochs. All of 20 per cent within km these combined represent one of Scotland’s greatest 25 per cent of Scottish Scotland has over economic and aesthetic business, accounting for 11,000km of coastline, assets.
  • Records of Species and Subspecies Recorded in Scotland on up to 20 Occasions

    Records of Species and Subspecies Recorded in Scotland on up to 20 Occasions

    Records of species and subspecies recorded in Scotland on up to 20 occasions In 1993 SOC Council delegated to The Scottish Birds Records Committee (SBRC) responsibility for maintaining the Scottish List (list of all species and subspecies of wild birds recorded in Scotland). In turn, SBRC appointed a subcommittee to carry out this function. Current members are Dave Clugston, Ron Forrester, Angus Hogg, Bob McGowan Chris McInerny and Roger Riddington. In 1996, Peter Gordon and David Clugston, on behalf of SBRC, produced a list of records of species recorded in Scotland on up to 5 occasions (Gordon & Clugston 1996). Subsequently, SBRC decided to expand this list to include all acceptable records of species recorded on up to 20 occasions, and to incorporate subspecies with a similar number of records (Andrews & Naylor 2002). The last occasion that a complete list of records appeared in print was in The Birds of Scotland, which included all records up until 2004 (Forrester et al. 2007). During the period from 2002 until 2013, amendments and updates to the list of records appeared regularly as part of SBRC’s Scottish List Subcommittee’s reports in Scottish Birds. Since 2014 these records have appear on the SOC’s website, a significant advantage being that the entire list of all records for such species can be viewed together (Forrester 2014). The Scottish List Subcommittee are now updating the list annually. The current update includes records from the British Birds Rarities Committee’s Report on rare birds in Great Britain in 2015 (Hudson 2016) and SBRC’s Report on rare birds in Scotland, 2015 (McGowan & McInerny 2017).
  • The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island

    The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island

    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 5 Print Reference: Pages 561-572 Article 43 2003 The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island Lawson L. Schroeder Philip L. Schroeder Bryan College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Schroeder, Lawson L. and Schroeder, Philip L. (2003) "The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 5 , Article 43. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol5/iss1/43 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ANCIENT STANDING STONES, VILLAGES AND TOMBS FOUND ON THE ORKNEY ISLANDS LAWSON L. SCHROEDER, D.D.S. PHILIP L. SCHROEDER 5889 MILLSTONE RUN BRYAN COLLEGE STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087 P. O. BOX 7484 DAYTON, TN 37321-7000 KEYWORDS: Orkney Islands, ancient stone structures, Skara Brae, Maes Howe, broch, Ring of Brodgar, Standing Stones of Stenness, dispersion, Babel, famine, Ice Age ABSTRACT The Orkney Islands make up an archipelago north of Scotland.
  • CARNOUSTIE and BARRY

    CARNOUSTIE and BARRY

    CARNOUSTIE and BARRY Angus Local Plan Review 131 CARNOUSTIE and BARRY 1. Carnoustie is an attractive seaside town, which was originally a fishing village. In recent years it has developed as a popular PROFILE commuter town, principally satisfying housing demand from the Role: Dundee Housing Market Area. Although opportunity for development A popular seaside holiday, was constrained during much of the 1990s, the position has been golfing and service centre with strong links to the wider South partly eased by the construction of the wastewater treatment plant at Angus and Dundee housing Hatton. market. 2. Barry village extends from the western edge of Carnoustie along Population: Census 2001 - 10561; the A930. The provision of the Barry bypass as part of the A92 1991 - 10488; project will remove through traffic from the village, significantly % change 91/01 : +0.78 improving the amenity of residents. Drainage and flooding issues, Housing Land Supply however, continue to restrict opportunities for development in Barry. June 2004 : existing 144 3. The first Angus Local Plan allocated greenfield housing land north allocated first ALP 74 of Newton Road, Carnoustie. This, together with a contribution from Employment Land Supply a range of brownfield sites, will meet housing land requirements for 2004 : this plan period. Panmure 0.75ha Drainage: available 4. The lack of a site for industrial/business use requires to be addressed taking account of the improved road access afforded by Water Supply: available the upgrading the A92 road and associated linkages to the town. 5. The beach, seafront and golf links provide Carnoustie and Barry with an excellent base for the holiday and tourism market and the Championship golf course enjoys an international reputation with the return of the British Open in 2007.
  • University of Bradford Ethesis

    University of Bradford Ethesis

    University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. THE NEOLITHIC AND LATE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM POOL, SANDAY, ORKNEY An archaeological and technological consideration of coarse pottery manufacture at the Neolithic and Late Iron Age site of Pool, Orkney, incorporating X-Ray Fluorescence, Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometric and Petrological Analyses 2 Volumes Volume 1 Ann MACSWEEN submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeological Sciences University of Bradford 1990 ABSTRACT Ann MacSween The Neolithic and Late Iron Age Pottery from Pool, Sanday, Orkney: An archaeological and technological consideration of coarse pottery manufacture at the Iron Age site of Pool, Orkney, incorporating X-Ray Fluorescence, Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometric and Petrological Analyses Key Words: Neolithic; Iron Age; Orkney; pottery; X-ray Fluorescence; Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry; Petrological Analysis The Neolithic and late Iron Age pottery from the settlement site of Pool, Sanday, Orkney, was studied on two levels. Firstly, a morphological and tech- nological study was carried out to establish a se- quence for the site. Secondly an assessment was made of the usefulness of X-ray Fluorescence Analysis, In- ductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry and Petrological analysis to coarse ware studies, using the Pool assem- blage as a case study. Recording of technological and typological attributes allowed three phases of Neolithic pottery to be iden- tified. The earliest phase included sherds of Unstan Ware.
  • Dumfriesshire

    Dumfriesshire

    Dumfriesshire Rare Plant Register 2020 Christopher Miles An account of the known distribution of the rare or scarce native plants in Dumfriesshire up to the end of 2019 Rare Plant Register Dumfriesshire 2020 Holy Grass, Hierochloe odorata Black Esk July 2019 2 Rare Plant Register Dumfriesshire 2020 Acknowledgements My thanks go to all those who have contributed plant records in Dumfriesshire over the years. Many people have between them provided hundreds or thousands of records and this publication would not have been possible without them. More particularly, before my recording from 1996 onwards, plant records have been collected and collated in three distinct periods since the nineteenth century by previous botanists working in Dumfriesshire. The first of these was George F. Scott- Elliot. He was an eminent explorer and botanist who edited the first and only Flora so far published for Dumfriesshire in 1896. His work was greatly aided by other contributing botanists probably most notably Mr J.T. Johnstone and Mr W. Stevens. The second was Humphrey Milne-Redhead who was a GP in Mainsriddle in Kircudbrightshire from 1947. He was both the vice county recorder for Bryophytes and for Higher Plants for all three Dumfries and Galloway vice counties! During his time the first systematic recording was stimulated by work for the first Atlas of the British Flora (1962). He published a checklist in 1971/72. The third period of recording was between 1975 and 1993 led by Stuart Martin and particularly Mary Martin after Stuart’s death. Mary in particular continued systematic recording and recorded for the monitoring scheme in 1987/88.
  • The Knowe of Rowiegar, Rousay, Orkney | 41

    The Knowe of Rowiegar, Rousay, Orkney | 41

    Proc Soc Antiq Scot 145 (2015), 41–89 THE KNOWE OF ROWIEGAR, ROUSAY, ORKNEY | 41 The Knowe of Rowiegar, Rousay, Orkney: description and dating of the human remains and context relative to neighbouring cairns Margaret Hutchison,* Neil Curtis* and Ray Kidd* ABSTRACT The Neolithic chambered cairn at Knowe of Rowiegar, Rousay, Orkney, was excavated in 1937 as part of a campaign that also saw excavations at sites such as Midhowe and the Knowe of Lairo. Not fully published at the time, and with only partial studies since, the human bone assemblage has now been largely re-united and investigated. This included an osteological study and AMS dating of selected bones from this site and other Rousay cairns in the care of University of Aberdeen Museums, as well as the use of archival sources to attempt a reconstruction of the site. It is suggested that the human remains were finally deposited as disarticulated bones and that the site was severely damaged at the time the adjacent Iron Age souterrain was constructed. The estimation of the minimum number of individuals represented in the assemblage showed a significant preponderance of crania and mandibles, suggesting the presence of at least 28 heads, along with much smaller numbers of other bones, while age and sex determinations showed a preponderance of adult males. Seven skulls showed evidence of violent trauma, while evidence from both bones and teeth indicates that there were high levels of childhood dietary deficiency. Although detailed analysis of the dates was hampered by the ‘Neolithic plateau’, a Bayesian analysis of the radiocarbon determinations suggests the use of the site during the period 3400 to 2900 cal BC.
  • Flood Risk Management Strategy Solway Local Plan District Section 3

    Flood Risk Management Strategy Solway Local Plan District Section 3

    Flood Risk Management Strategy Solway Local Plan District This section provides supplementary information on the characteristics and impacts of river, coastal and surface water flooding. Future impacts due to climate change, the potential for natural flood management and links to river basin management are also described within these chapters. Detailed information about the objectives and actions to manage flooding are provided in Section 2. Section 3: Supporting information 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 31 1 3.2 River flooding ......................................................................................... 31 2 • Esk (Dumfriesshire) catchment group .............................................. 31 3 • Annan catchment group ................................................................... 32 1 • Nith catchment group ....................................................................... 32 7 • Dee (Galloway) catchment group ..................................................... 33 5 • Cree catchment group ...................................................................... 34 2 3.3 Coastal flooding ...................................................................................... 349 3.4 Surface water flooding ............................................................................ 359 Solway Local Plan District Section 3 310 3.1 Introduction In the Solway Local Plan District, river flooding is reported across five distinct river catchments.