Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works Alabama Law Scholarly Commons Articles Faculty Scholarship 2006 Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works Alan L. Durham University of Alabama - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles Recommended Citation Alan L. Durham, Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works, 81 Ind. L.J. 851 (2006). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles/90 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works ALAN L. DURHAM* INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................851 I. EXPRESSION TRANSFORMED .........................................................................855 A . Derivative W orks ................................................................................856 B. Transformation and Presentation...................................................... 861 C. Moral R ights .......................................................................................863 D . F air Use .............................................................................................866 E. De Minimis Infringement.................................................................... 875 II. EXPERIENCE TRANSFORMED .........................................................................877 A. FirstSale and Other Statutory Rights ................................................877 B. The Consumer Right to Time-Shift .....................................................880 C. Modifications of Copyrighted Software.............................................. 884 III. THE GATHERING STORM ...............................................................................894 IV. THE PROS AND CONS OF CONSUMER MODIFICATION ....................................900 A. An Economic Perspective................................................................... 900 B. Consumer Expectations...................................................................... 905 C. Integrity, Privacy,and Autonomy .......................................................908 V . SEEKING BOUNDARIES ..................................................................................910 C ONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................914 INTRODUCTION Whether they are writings, musical compositions, works of visual art, or dramatic presentations,' traditional works of authorship offer consumers a simple alternative: "take it or leave it." However much consumers may desire it, Rick cannot join Ilsa on the plane leaving Casablanca; Ahab cannot survive the voyage of the Pequod; and a recorded performance of Mozart's Symphony No. 40 in G Minor cannot be heard, even on the most sophisticated reproduction equipment, in any key other than G minor. That is not to say that consumers are powerless; they exercise their power by "leaving it"-by forsaking authors who fail to satisfy in favor of others who succeed. Consumers change the channel, cancel their subscription, or choose another book. New technologies assign consumers a more active role in shaping their experience of copyrighted works. Recent video games, for example, provide the complex plots and immersive settings of motion pictures, but in a way that allows consumers to * Professor of Law, University of Alabama School of Law. J.D. 1988, University of California, Berkeley. I would like to thank the University of Alabama Law School Foundation and Dean Kenneth Randall for their support of this research. I would also like to thank Creighton Miller of the University of Alabama School of Law library for his expert assistance in locating sources. 1. Copyright protection extends to "original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression," including, among other things, literary works, musical works, motion pictures, pictorial and sculptural works, sound recordings, and architectural works. 17 U.S.C. § 102 (2000). INDIANA LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 81:851 participate in the unfolding narrative. 2 Internet Web sites feature graphics and the written word in the nonlinear medium of hypertext, which invites readers to explore according to their own predilections. In these cases, the author intends the work to be experienced in this flexible, interactive fashion; however, as technologies develop and consumer expectations change, the desire of individuals to customize their experience will come into conflict with the desire of authors to control how their works are presented. The recent and well-publicized dispute between certain motion picture directors and editing service ClearPlay shows that the conflict has already begun.3 For a fee, ClearPlay allows consumers who have purchased a DVD copy of a copyrighted motion picture to experience that motion picture without profanity, vulgarity, or violence. Critics describe this practice as an assault on the director's artistic integrity and a violation of copyright. Consumers might defend it as a prerogative of ownership, an exercise of their individuality, or a defense of "family values." As more works of authorship are delivered through digital media, the temptation can only grow to improve, rearrange, customize, and remix. Traditionally, copyright law has been a product of compromise, balancing the rights of authors against the interests of those who would benefit from their work. The ultimate goal of copyright, as stated in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, is to promote "the Progress of Science," 6 which may be expressed in modem terms as the advancement of knowledge and the development of culture. 7 If the rights of authors are too weak, copyists reap the benefits of their work, and deny authors the financial rewards necessary to spur their labors.8 Authors produce less and the intellectual life of the nation suffers. Yet "the Progress of Science" also depends upon some freedom to build upon existing works of authorship. 9 Works of art allude to prior works, 2. See Suneel Ratan, Games Close in on Citizen Kane, WnED NEws, Aug. 11, 2003, http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,59964,00.html. According to the article, a recent Star Wars video game provides a narrative experience in many ways superior to a motion picture because it is interactive. Players choose their gender, their behavior, and, ultimately, whether or not to align themselves with the Dark Side of the Force. 3. Huntsman v. Soderbergh, No. 02-CV-1662 (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2002). Other parties to the case provided similar editing services, under names such as Movie Shield and Movie Mask. 4. For a discussion of the specifics of ClearPlay technology, see infra Part IIl. 5. The Web site of the Director's Guild of America, www.dga.org, is a fruitful source of press releases and other materials critical of the editing practices. The counterclaims filed in Huntsman set out claims of trademark and copyright infringement alleged by both the directors involved in the litigation and the motion picture studios. 6. The entire passage reads: "[Congress shall have power to] promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 8, cl. 8. 7. See Karl B. Lutz, Patentsand Science: A Clarificationof the PatentClause of the U.S. Constitution, 18 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 50, 51 (1949) ("The word 'science,' which comes from the Latin, scire, 'to know,' at the writing of the Constitution meant learning in general." (italics in original)). 8. If copiers were not restrained, the price of the work would be forced by competition to the level of marginal cost, which would not permit the author to recoup the initial investment in creating the work. William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 18 J. LEGAL STuD. 325, 326 (1989). 9. This point has been forcefully argued by Jessica Litman. See, e.g., Jessica Litman, The 2006] CONSUMER MODIFICATION OF COPYRIGHTED WORKS 853 established styles, and familiar subject matter; factual works benefit from existing research; works of scholarship and criticism, to the extent they refer to some prior work, often reproduce a portion of that work in order to make their point.'0 If the law allowed authors to prevent such uses of their work, the harm would be immeasurable. The tension between the needs of earlierauthors and subsequent authors,each of which must be respected to achieve the constitutional objectives of copyright," 1can be identified as the source of much that is fundamental in copyright doctrine. An infringing work need not be identical, but must be "substantially similar," to the copyrighted work.12 Independent creation is a complete defense, no matter how similar 3 a new work may be to an existing one.' Authors can borrow facts and "ideas" from14 earlier works, but only if those facts and ideas are clothed in new "expression.' Authors cannot object to the "fair use" of their copyrighted works by subsequent authors for purposes such as criticism, scholarship, and commentary. 15 The rights of consumers are comparatively upstaged. 16 Certain property rights flow from the ownership of a physical copy of a copyrighted work, such as the right to sell, lend, or otherwise dispose of that copy. 17 But little has been
Recommended publications
  • Rafał Olbinski – Bio
    Rafał Olbinski – bio Born in Kielce, Poland in 1945, Rafal Olbinski studied architecture before dedicating himself to painting and design. He graduated from the Architectural Department of Warsaw Politechnical School. In 1982 he immigrated to the US, where he soon established himself as a prominent painter, illustrator and designer. In 1985, he began teaching at the School of Visual Arts in New York. For his artistic achievements, he has received more than 150 awards including Gold and Silver Medals from the Society of Illustrators in New York and Los Angeles, and The Big Crit 2000 award by Critique Magazine in San Francisco. In 1994 he was awarded the International Oscar for the World’s Most Memorable Poster, The Prix Savignac, in Paris. The President of the Republic of Poland awarded Olbinski the highest award in the field of arts, the gold medal, “Gloria Artist”. Rafal with Mayor Giuliani In the same year he received the Creative Review Award for the Best of British Illustration in London. In 1995 a jury led by Mayor Rudolf Giuliani chose his poster as the official New York City Capital of the World Poster. In the following year he won the Steven Dohanos Award for the best painting in the Annual Member Exhibition of the Society of Illustrators. In July 2002 the City of Fondi, Italy awarded himDivina Giulia for his contribution to contemporary art. In 1996 he was commissioned by the U.S. Information Agency to design a poster celebrating the 25th Earth Day anniversary and commissioned again in 2004 to create the Earth Day NY poster.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 81 Issue 3 Article 2 Summer 2006 Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works Alan L. Durham University of Alabama School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Durham, Alan L. (2006) "Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 81 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol81/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Consumer Modification of Copyrighted Works ALAN L. DURHAM* INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................851 I. EXPRESSION TRANSFORMED .........................................................................855 A . Derivative W orks ................................................................................856 B. Transformation and Presentation...................................................... 861 C. Moral R ights .......................................................................................863 D . F air Use .............................................................................................866 E. De Minimis Infringement...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Para-Sites: the Case for Hyperlinking As Copyright Infringement
    Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 18 Number 2 Article 4 1-1-1998 Para-Sites: The Case for Hyperlinking as Copyright Infringement Jonathan B. Ko Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jonathan B. Ko, Para-Sites: The Case for Hyperlinking as Copyright Infringement, 18 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 361 (1998). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol18/iss2/4 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARA-SITES: THE CASE FOR HYPERLINKING AS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT I. INTRODUCTION The Internet enables society to share information and ideas more effectively than ever before. The dissemination of information on the Internet, unlike the use of books, magazines, or other traditional print media, is not constrained by the costs and delay of printing. Once an author makes his or her work available on the Internet, it is immediately accessible by millions of people around the world. The ease with which the Internet is accessed dramatically changes the way that copyrighted works are reproduced and distributed. However, that accessibility can also facilitate the infringement of those copyrights.' In attempting to maintain the balance between the benefits offered by the Internet and the rights of authors, courts have realized that traditional copyright2 concepts are strained when applied to the technology of the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Duardo Interviewed by Karen Mary Davalos on November 5, 8, and 12, 2007
    CSRC ORAL HISTORIES SERIES NO. 9, NOVEMBER 2013 RICHARD DUARDO INTERVIEWED BY KAREN MARY DAVALOS ON NOVEMBER 5, 8, AND 12, 2007 Richard Duardo was born in East Los Angeles and is a graduate of UCLA. His serigraphs have been shown internationally and are represented in notable public and private collections, including the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. He is a recipient of an Artist of the Year award from the California Arts Commission. In 1978 he established Hecho en Aztlán, a fine art print studio, followed by Aztlán Multiples, Multiples Fine Art, Future Perfect, Art & Commerce, and his present studio, Modern Multiples, Inc. He has printed the work of more than 300 artists. Duardo lives in Los Angeles. Karen Mary Davalos is chair and professor of Chicana/o studies at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. Her research interests encompass representational practices, including art exhibition and collection; vernacular performance; spirituality; feminist scholarship and epistemologies; and oral history. Among her publications are Yolanda M. López (UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2008); “The Mexican Museum of San Francisco: A Brief History with an Interpretive Analysis,” in The Mexican Museum of San Francisco Papers, 1971–2006 (UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2010); and Exhibiting Mestizaje: Mexican (American) Museums in the Diaspora (University of New Mexico Press, 2001). This interview was conducted as part of the L.A. Xicano project. Preferred citation: Richard Duardo, interview with Karen Mary Davalos, November 5, 8, and 12, 2007, Los Angeles, California. CSRC Oral Histories Series, no. 9. Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 15, Number 12, May 1994
    ENTERTAINMENT LAW REPORTER LEGAL AFFAIRS Future Technology Clauses and Future Technologies Legal Roadblocks to New Media Uses Along the Information Super Highway by Alex Alben I. The Promise While spellbinding audiences with a grand vision of fu- ture forms of home entertainment, preachers of the com- ing age of New Media and the Information Super Highway make a dangerous assumption. Their vision embraces the notion that motion pictures, television pro- grams, records, and other audiovisual works will be dig- itized, stored on video servers connected to fiber optic VOLUME 15, NUMBER 12, MAY 1994 ENTERTAINMENT LAW REPORTER networks, and accessed on demand when a viewer pushes a remote control button operating the set top box of a home television monitor or personal computer. We've been led to believe that ordering "Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid" at 9:16 p.m. on a Friday eve- ning will be as convenient as ordering a Domino's pizza. (Actually, even more so, as the delivery time will be on the order of one to five minutes in the ultimate Video On Demand universe.) The same bold promises extend to the creation of New Media products, such as CD-ROM applications of books, plays, great works of art, rock videos and practi- cally anything else that can be captured in a visual or audio format, digitized and pressed onto a polycarbon- ate disk. The dangerous flaw in this grand vision is that the con- tent owners of films or other media products may not possess the legal rights to deliver their content by new VOLUME 15, NUMBER 12, MAY 1994 ENTERTAINMENT LAW REPORTER means or in new forms such as CD-ROM's.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court Sculpts a Definition...Is It a Work for Hire
    Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 10 Number 1 Article 11 1-1-1990 The Supreme Court Sculpts a Definition...Is it a orkW for Hire Marita Covarrubias Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Marita Covarrubias, The Supreme Court Sculpts a Definition...Is it a orkW for Hire, 10 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 353 (1989). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol10/iss1/11 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SUPREME COURT SCULPTS A DEFINITION... IS IT A WORK FOR HIRE? I. INTRODUCTION For the photographer who is asked to take portraits of the British royal children,1 for the computer programmer asked to create an educa- tional software system for a software firm,2 or for the architect who de- signs a building for a contractor,3 the issue of copyright ownership has been ambiguous. These parties are not formal salaried employees who know that copyright ownership will vest in their employer. Nor is the type of work they create specifically recognized by the law as being spe- cially ordered or commissioned. If the issue of copyright comes up, and no agreements have been reached, the creators and their hiring parties have been uncertain as to who owns the copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue by Lot Number March 3 2019
    CATALOGUE BY LOT NUMBER LOT 1 TAKASHI MURAKAMI (born 1962) Reverse Double Helix Mega Power, 2005 LOT 4 Offset-lithograph on wove paper JOAN MIRO Edition of 900 (1893-1983) Signed and numbered in ink on recto Le Magnetiseur - Fond Blanc, 1969 Image: 28 x 28 inches; Framed: 36 x 36 inches Lithograph Estimate: $1,000/$1,500 Edition of 75 Signature and edition number on recto Image: 23 x 33 inches; Framed: 28 x 36 inches Estimate: $5,000/$7,000 LOT 2 GREG MILLER (born 1951) Barney’s #2, Venice Beach, LA, CA, date unknown Oil and resin on wood Size: 38 x 47.5 inches LOT 5 Provenance: William Turner Gallery PABLO PICASSO Estimate: $1,800/$2,500 (1881-1973) Colombe sur lit de paille, 1949 Glazed and engraved ceramic plate Stamped and marked ‘Madoura Plein Feu/CR/ Madoura/d’apres Picasso/Nouvelle Edition’ on verso Plate: 15 x 12 inches; Framed: 22.5 x 18 inches Estimate: $8,000/$12,000 LOT 3 LADDIE JOHN DILL (born 1943) Untitled, c. 1980-1990 Oil & carved cement on gesso board Image: 42 x 84 inches Estimate: $2,000/$3,000 CATALOGUE BY LOT NUMBER LOT 6 PABLO PICASSO (1881-1973) LOT 9 Portrait of Rimbaud, 1960 DAVID HOCKNEY Lithograph (born 1937) Edition of 97 Untitled (Stanley), c. 1989 Signature, date, and edition number on recto Mixed media, thermal faxes Image: 11 x15 inches; Framed: 21 x 25 inches Framed: 58 x 61.25 inches Estimate: $5,000/$7,000 Provenance: Billy Wilder Estimate: $8,000/$12,000 LOT 7 ROBERT PETERSEN (born 1945) February 28th, 1986, 1990 Mixed media on linen backed paper with collage Signed and titled on recto Image: 60.25
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Digital Agenda 2030
    Literature title Literature Japan Digital Agenda 2030 Big moves to restore digital competitiveness and productivity February 2021 www.digitaljapan2030.com Contents 5 Foreword 6 Executive summary 9 The current state of digital in Japan 9 Japan’s digital scorecard 12 The trends pushing for digital change 13 Japan’s endowment 16 Contextual Japanese constraints on digitization 18 Big moves for Japan: change story and economic impact 25 Big move 1: Develop a deep bench of world-class talent literate in cloud tools, software development, artificial intelligence and other digital technologies and ways of working 31 Big move 2: Drive broad-scale upskilling across the workforce by shifting from traditional to adaptive learning to build digitally relevant skillsets 35 Big move 3: Drive end-to-end digitization of education sector from pre-school to tertiary education with solutions for school and educator efficiency, as well as student access 43 Big move 4: Industrial manufacturing to build on hardware, robotics, and automotive endowments by leapfrogging with software, machine learning and deep learning 55 Big move 5: Retail to capitalize on shifting customer trends by delivering digital omnichannel experiences 65 Big move 6: Healthcare to lead globally on next-generation personalized, remote solutions targeting elderly care 75 Big move 7: Financial services providers to build mobile and broad accessibility solutions by leveraging cloud infrastructure and open network 85 Big move 8: Government to define a vision and bold goals to provide digital
    [Show full text]
  • V. Copyright's Exclusive Rights
    V. Copyright’s Exclusive Rights To mount a successful claim of copyright infringement, a plaintiff needs to establish (1) the plaintiff’s ownership of a valid copyright in a work and (2) the defendant’s infringement of the copyright. Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991); see 17 U.S.C. §§ 501(a)-(b). In Chapters II through IV, you learned about the first element of an infringement claim: the plaintiff’s ownership of copyright in a fixed, original work of authorship, wherein the copyright remains in effect pursuant to the requisite formalities and duration rules. Starting in this chapter and continuing through Chapter VIII, we turn to the second element of the infringement inquiry. In this chapter, you will study the exclusive rights that copyright law provides to copyright holders. A defendant infringes by violating any of these exclusive rights without a defense (such as a limitation on infringement or exclusion of certain actions from infringement). We study some of these limitations and exclusions in this chapter, while deferring the most important infringement defense—fair use—to Chapter VI. In Chapter VII, we will turn to direct and secondary liability, and in Chapter VIII, to copyright litigation and remedies. Specifically, in this chapter, after setting out the infringement elements that must be established to prove that any of the exclusive rights has been violated, we study each of the exclusive rights set out in 17 U.S.C. § 106. Section 106 provides: Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner
    [Show full text]
  • Prices Realized November 12Th 13Th, 2011 Lot Description Price 4000
    Prices Realized November 12th 13th, 2011 Lot Description Price Pre‐Columbian style brass alloy figural pendant, surmounted by an elaborate bird‐form headdress and 4000 backed by wing‐like appendages, 2.8''l $ 125 Japanese stained paulownia wood figural carving of Fukurokuju, standing with his hands to the front and hidden by his long robes, the bearded face with crisply carved features, the square plinth signed on the 4001 underside and inscribed with the cylical date tsuchinoto‐mi (1929), 8.5''h $ 75 Japanese ivory figural carving (okimono), 20th century, depicting an itinerant entertainer standing with his pet monkey standing on his shoulder and waving a rattle, a small boy with a staff walking to one side, with 4002 stained details (age crack), 4.75''h $ 125 (Lot of 5) East Indian tinted ivory bangle bracelets, most of muted red hue, each fashioned in two hemispherical sections joined by hinged silver fittings, one with repousse decoration, largest 3.75''d 4003 (exterior) $ 850 Chinese hardwood figural carving of Budai, the so‐called 'Laughing Buddha' holding a fan and dancing on top 4004 of his treasure sack guarded by five youths, 8.5''h $ 150 Chinese porcelain blanc de Chine/Dehua Guanyin, the serene face below a tall chignon partially hidden under a cowl which further drapes over her shoulders and is gathered with rhythmic folds at the sleeves, all 4005 standing above a lotus pond with cresting waves, reversed marked 'Dehua' and 'Boji Yuren', 10''h $ 75 Chinese metal figure of children and oxen, depicting a child trying to pull
    [Show full text]
  • Moma Acquisitions 2014-2015 Architecture and Design a Total of 1,120 Works Were Acquired by the Department of Architecture and Design
    MoMA Acquisitions 2014-2015 Architecture and Design A total of 1,120 works were acquired by the Department of Architecture and Design. This includes 354 architectural drawings, 23 architectural models, 215 architectural photos, 92 design objects, and 436 graphic design works. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS Asymptote Architecture, New York. Hani Rashid, Lise Anne Couture. Wing House, Helsinki, Finland. 2011. Digital Jimmy Alcock. Architect’s House, Caracas, Venezuela. rendering, 16 1/2 x 16 1/2" (41.9 x 41.9 cm). Purchase 1962. Ink on paper, 16 9/16 x 23 3/8" (42 x 59.4 cm). Gift of the architect Asymptote Architecture, New York. Hani Rashid, Lise Anne Couture. Wing House, Helsinki, Finland. 2011. Jimmy Alcock. Architect’s House, Caracas, Venezuela. Digital rendering, 5 x 17 3/8" (12.7 x 44.1 cm). Purchase 1962. Ink on paper. Gift of the architect Asymptote Architecture, New York. Hani Rashid, Lise Anne Jimmy Alcock. Architect’s House, Caracas, Venezuela. Couture. Wing House, Helsinki, Finland. 2011. Digital 1962. Pencil and ink on paper. Gift of the architect rendering, 4 5/8 x 17 3/8" (11.7 x 44.1 cm). Purchase Jimmy Alcock. Altolar Building, Caracas, Venezuela. Asymptote Architecture, New York. Hani Rashid, Lise Anne 1966. Pencil and ink on paper, 27 1/2 x 39 1/4" Couture. Wing House, Helsinki, Finland. 2011. Digital (69.9 x 99.7 cm). Gift of the architect rendering, 10 5/8 x 16 1/2" (27 x 41.9 cm). Purchase Jimmy Alcock. Altolar Building, Caracas, Venezuela. Asymptote Architecture, New York. Hani Rashid, Lise Anne 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue by Lot Number March 3 2019
    LOT 1 TAKASHI MURAKAMI (born 1962) Reverse Double Helix Mega Power, 2005 Offset-lithograph on wove paper LOT 4 Edition of 900 JOAN MIRO Signed and numbered in ink on recto (1893-1983) Image: 28 x 28 inches; Framed: 36 x 36 inches Le Magnetiseur - Fond Blanc, 1969 Estimate: $1,000/$1,500 Lithograph Edition of 75 Signature and edition number on recto Image: 23 x 33 inches; Framed: 28 x 36 inches Estimate: $5,000/$7,000 LOT 2 GREG MILLER (born 1951) Barney’s #2, Venice Beach, LA, CA, c. 2003 Oil and resin on wood Signed and titled on verso Size: 38 x 47.5 inches LOT 5 Provenance: William Turner Gallery PABLO PICASSO Estimate: $1,800/$2,500 (1881-1973) Colombe sur lit de paille, 1949 Glazed and engraved ceramic plate Stamped and marked ‘Madoura Plein Feu/CR/ Madoura/d’apres Picasso/Nouvelle Edition’ on verso Plate: 15 x 12 inches; Framed: 22.5 x 18 inches Estimate: $8,000/$12,000 LOT 3 LADDIE JOHN DILL (born 1943) Untitled, c. 1980-1990 Oil & carved cement on gesso board Image: 42 x 84 inches Estimate: $2,000/$3,000 LOT 6 PABLO PICASSO (1881-1973) LOT 9 Portrait of Rimbaud, 1960 DAVID HOCKNEY Lithograph (born 1937) Edition of 97 Untitled (Stanley), c. 1989 Signature, date, and edition number in pencil on recto Mixed media, thermal faxes Image: 11 x15 inches; Framed: 21 x 25 inches Includes sheet with faxed signature and instructions Estimate: $5,000/$7,000 Framed: 58 x 61.25 inches Provenance: Billy Wilder Estimate: $8,000/$12,000 LOT 7 ROBERT PETERSEN (born 1945) February 28th, 1986, 1990 Mixed media on linen backed paper with collage Signed
    [Show full text]